DOCSLIB.ORG

KISS Lunar Volatiles Workshop 7-22-2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
KISS Lunar Volatiles Workshop 7-22-2013 Future Lunar Missions: Plans and Opportunities Leon Alkalai, JPL New Approaches to Lunar Ice Detection and Mapping Workshop Keck Institute of Space Studies July 22nd – July 25th, 2013 California Institute of Technology Some Lunar Robotic Science & Exploration Mission Formulation Studies at JPL (2003 – 2013) MoonRise New Frontiers GRAIL (2005-2007) Moonlight (2003-2004) (2005-2012) Lunette – Discovery Proposal Pre-Phase A Network of small landers (2005-2011) MIRANDA: cold trap access (2010) Lunar Impactor (2006) Other Lunar Science & Exploration Studies at JPL (2003 – 2013) • Sample Acquisition and Transfer Systems (SATS) • Landers: hard landers, soft landers, powered descent, hazard avoidance, nuclear powered lander and rover • Sub-surface access: penetrators deployed from orbit, drills, heat- flow probe, etc. • Surface mobility: Short-range, long-range, access to cold traps in deep craters • CubeSats and other micro-spacecraft deployed e.g. gravity mapping • International Studies & Discussions: – MoonLITE lunar orbiter and probes with UKSA – Farside network of lunar landers, with ESA, CNES, IPGP – Lunar Exploration Orbiter (LEO) with DLR – Lunar Com Relay Satellite with ISRO – Canadian Space Agency: robotics, surface mobility – In-situ science with RSA, landers, rovers – JAXA lunar landers, rovers – Korean Space Agency 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 3 Robotic Missions to the Moon: Just in the last decade: 2003 - 2013 • Smart-1 ESA September 2003 • Chang’e-1 China October 2007 • SELENE-1 Japan September 2007 • Chandrayaan-1 India October 2008 – M3, Mini-SAR USA • LRO USA June 2009 • LCROSS USA June 2009 • Chang’e-2 China October 2010 • GRAIL USA September 2011 • LADEE USA September 6 th , 2013 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 4 GRAIL: Gravity Recovery And Interior Laboratory demonstrated 30 nm/s range rate measurement X-band Radio Science Beacon S-band link Telecom/Nav S-band Timing Code Ka-band ranging Maria Zuber, MIT, PI Dave E. Smith, GSFC, DPI Leon Alkalai, CL, JPL MoonRise Lunar sample Return from South Pole-Aitken Basin Bradley L. Jolliff, PI Leon Alkalai, CL Johnson Space Center Ames Research Center Langley Research Center Kennedy Space Center The technical data in this document is controlled under the U.S. Export Regulations, release to foreign persons may require an export authorization. Use or disclosure of information contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. 7/23/2013 7 Overview of MoonRise Mission Lunar Orbit ~100 km x 1830 km Trans-Lunar S-Band (3.5-hour period) Cruise 108 days Radio to UHF Relay DSN to lander Trans-Lunar Trans-Earth Cruise 125 Cruise days 137 days Lunar Arrival SRC Separation Separation Maneuver LAV De- commissioning Moon, SPA basin Deflected from Earth-Moon 10-day surface operations System DSN - ComSat timeline S-Band Two Landing SRC Landing at Site Workshops Utah Test & prior to PDR; Training Range Landing site (UTTR ) selection by CDR Preliminary Sample Examination, JSC Analysis – PDR CDR Return + 6 Mo; Return + 2 yrs Apr Apr Jul Nov Apr Nov May 11/22 12/01 2013 2014 2016 2016 2017 2017 2019 MoonRise Overview Use or disclosure of information contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this document. 8 Lunette Lu nar Geophysical Net work Clive Neal, PI, UND John Elliott, CL, JPL Lunette: Network of Small Lunar Landers Pressurant Tank (PSI 80345) Langmuir Probe Context Cameras (3) Solar Array Retroreflector (shown stowed) Magnetometer /Electrometer (shown stowed) SEIS Seismometer (shown stowed) Instrument Mole/Heat Probe Deployment Arm (shown stowed) WEB Thruster Cluster (2 MR-107S & 3 MR-103G) Propellant Tank (PSI 80298) Thermal Reflector (1 of 3) 10 10 Moon Ice Resource Abundance & Natural Distribution Assessment (MIRANDA) Leon Alkalai, Ben Solish & George Chen 7/23/2013 11 Example of a Mother/daughter System •Moonrise Lander •ATHLETE Mother-ship Mobile daughters with science payload •Mother-ship with science payload; provides •Axel Daughter-ship power/comm. to daughters Tether provides power/comm. to daughters 7/23/2013 12 ORION/MoonRise: Joint Human-Robotic LUNAR Sample Return Mission Concept Orion/MoonRise: Mission Architecture (LEAG 2012, IEEE Aerospace 2013) Capture and Hab EML2 Arrival Rendezvous EML2 Orbit Sample Transfer Departure ~3 month Remote Land Low-Energy LAV Ops Lunar Transfer Lunar Ascent Lunar Surface Flyby Flyby 10 Day MR EML1 Arrival Surface Mission EML1 Orbit MR Descent 3.5 days to Flyby, 8 days to Service EML2 Module Low Earth Expended Orbit: 185 km Human Mission: Direct Entry, MPCV 31+ days Landing MoonRise Habitation Module Habitation EARTH 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 14 InSight NASA Discovery-12 Competition Leon Alkalai, Capture Lead JPL JPL D-75337 The next Mars Lander: InSight 2016 SEIS is sensitive to displacements of ~2.5x10 -11 m 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 16 NASA Lunar Landers under development MSFC & APL: Mighty Eagle Lunar Lander JSC: Morpheus Lunar Lander ARC: LANDEE JPL: MoonRise Lander & Sample Return Vehicle (SRV) $30M Lunar X PRIZE Sponsored by $20M Grand Google and Prize to first managed by private team the X PRIZE to land on Foundation Moon, travel 500 meters and broadcast A follow-on HD images and challenge to video to Earth the successful $10M Ansari X PRIZE for the first private spaceship A Vision of a Permanent Robotic Village on the Moon Robotic Assembly of Human Habitats, Infrastructure on the Moon Publications Orion/MoonRise: Leon Alkalai et. al., “Orion/MoonRise: A Proposed Human & Robotic Sample Return Mission from the Lunar South-Pole Aitken Basin,”., IEEE Aerospace 2013, Big Sky. MoonRise: Jolliff, B. L., C. Shearer, D. Papanastassiou, L. Alkalai , R. Jaumann, G. Osinski, and the MoonRise Science Team (2010) MoonRise sample return from the South Pole-Aitken Basin. Lunar Exploration Analysis Group (LEAG) Annual Meeting, Sep. 14-17, Washington, DC. Jolliff, B. L., L. Alkalai , C.M. Pieters, J. W. Head III, D. A. Papanastassiou, and E. B. Bierhaus, (2010) Sampling the South Pole- Aitken Basin: Objectives and site selection criteria. Lunar and Planetary Science 41, #2450. Trebi-Ollennu, Ashitey , …, Alkalai, Leon , “ Lunar Surface Operation Testbed (LSOT) ”, Aerospace Conference, 2012 IEEE, March 3-10, 2012, Big Sky, MT, USA. 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 21 Publications Lunette: Alkalai, L., and J.O. Elliott, “Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers”, presented at the Joint Annual Meeting of LEAG-ICEUM-SRR, Cape Canaveral, FL, October 30, 2008. Babuscia, A., L. Alkalai, J. Elliott, D. W. Miller, “Multi-Objective Optimization Methodology for Communication Systems with Application to Lunar Robotic Exploration”, Proceedings of 61st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, 2010. Bailey, Z., A. Babuscia, L. Alkalai, J. Elliott, D. W. Miller, “A Trade Space Model for Distributed Lunar Surface Exploration”, Proceedings of 60 th International Astronautical Congress, South Korea, 2009. Elliott, J.O. and L. Alkalai, “Lunette: A Network of Lunar Landers for In-situ Geophysical Science”, Acta Astronautica 68 (2011), 1201-1207, April-May, 2011. 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 22 Publications Lunette: Elliott, J.O. and L. Alkalai, “Concept for a Lunar Transfer Vehicle for Small Satellite Delivery to the Moon from the International Space Station”, Paper No. IAC-10-B4.8.8, Proceedings of the 61 st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, Cz., October, 2010. Elliott, J.O. and L. Alkalai, “A Discovery-Class Lunette Mission Concept for a Lunar Geophysical Network”, IAC-10-B4.8.5, Proceedings of the 61 st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, Cz., October, 2010. Elliott, J.O., and L. Alkalai, “Lunette: A Low-Cost Concept Enabling Multi-Lander Lunar Science and Exploration Missions”, Acta Astronautica 66 (2010), 269-278, June, 2009. Jones, M.A, J.O. Elliott, and L. Alkalai, “Systems Engineering Approach and Design Trades for the Lunette Geophysical Network Lander”, Paper No. 1211, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, March 6-13, 2010. 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 23 Publications InSight A. Trebi-Ollenu, A. L. Rankin, K. Tso, R. G. Deen, H. Aghazarian, E. A. Kulczycki, R. G. Bonitz, and L. Alkalai , “Instrument Deployment Testbed for Planetary Geophysical Exploration,”, IEEE Aerospace, 2013, Big Sky, Montana. Farside Explorer “Farside explorer: Unique science from a mission to the farside of the moon,” Mimoun, D., Wieczorek, M.A., Alkalai, L ., Banerdt, W.B., et. al., Experimental Astronomy, Vo. 33, Issue 2-3, 2012, pp. 529 – 585. 7/23/2013 L. Alkalai, JPL 24.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Annotated List of Works Cited Primary Sources Newspapers “Apollo 11 se Vraci na Zemi.” Rude Pravo [Czechoslovakia] 22 July 1969. 1. Print. This was helpful for us because it showed how the U.S. wasn’t the only ones effected by this event. This added more to our project so we had views from outside the US. Barbuor, John. “Alunizaron, Bajaron, Caminaron, Trabajaron: Proeza Lograda.” Excelsior [Mexico] 21 July 1969. 1. Print. The front page of this newspaper was extremely helpful to our project because we used it to see how this event impacted the whole world not just America. Beloff, Nora. “The Space Race: Experts Not Keen on Getting a Man on the Moon.” Age [Melbourne] 24 April 1962. 2. Print. This was an incredibly important article to use in out presentation so that we could see different opinions. This article talked about how some people did not want to go to the moon; we didn’t find many articles like this one. In most everything we have read it talks about the advantages of going to the moon. This is why this article was so unique and important. Canadian Press. “Half-billion Watch the Moon Spectacular.” Gazette [Montreal] 21 July 1969. 4. Print. This source gave us a clear idea about how big this event really was, not only was it a big deal in America, but everywhere else in the world. This article told how Russia and China didn’t have TV’s so they had to find other ways to hear about this event like listening to the radio.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Langley Research Center 2012
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER 2012 www.nasa.gov An Orion crew capsule test article moments before it is dropped into a An Atlantis flag flew outside Langley’s water basin at Langley to simulate an ocean splashdown. headquarters building during NASA’s final space shuttle mission in July. Launching a New Era of Exploration Welcome to Langley NASA Langley had a banner year in 2012 as we helped propel the nation toward a new age of air and space. From delivering on missions to creating new technologies and knowledge for space, aviation and science, Langley continued the rich tradition of innovation begun 95 years ago. Langley is providing leading-edge research and game-changing technology innovations for human space exploration. We are testing prototype articles of the Orion crew vehicle to optimize designs and improve landing systems for increased crew survivability. Langley has had a role in private-industry space exploration through agreements with SpaceX, Sierra Nevada Corp. and Boeing to provide engineering expertise, conduct testing and support research. Aerospace and Science With the rest of the world, we held our breath as the Curiosity rover landed on Mars – with Langley’s help. The Langley team performed millions of simulations of the entry, descent and landing phase of the Mars Science Laboratory mission to enable a perfect landing, Langley Center Director Lesa Roe and Mark Sirangelo, corporate and for the first time made temperature and pressure vice president and head of Sierra Nevada Space Systems, with measurements as the spacecraft descended, providing the Dream Chaser Space System model.
    [Show full text]
  • MOONLITE : the SCIENTIFIC CASE. IA Crawford1, AJ Ball2, L. Wilson3
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1069.pdf * MOONLITE : THE SCIENTIFIC CASE. I.A. Crawford1, A.J. Ball2, L. Wilson3, A. Smith4, Y. Gao5 and the UK Pene- trator Consortium6. 1School of Earth Sciences, Birkbeck College, London, WC1E 7HX, UK. 2Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. 3Department of Environmental Science, Lancaster University, UK. 4Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, UK. 5Surrey Space Centre, University of Surrey, UK.6www.mssl.ucl.ac.uk/pages/general/news/UKLPC/UKLPC.pdf. *MoonLITE is a UK-led initiative which is currently the focus of a joint UK-NASA study. (Email: [email protected]). Introduction: The principal scientific importance the lunar crust and upper mantle [4,5]. However, the of the Moon is as a recorder of geological processes deep interior of the Moon was only very loosely con- active in the early history of terrestrial planets (e.g. strained by Apollo seismology due to the geographi- planetary differentiation, magma ocean formation and cally limited coverage of the network (essentially a evolution, etc), and of the near-Earth cosmic environ- triangle between the Apollo 12/14, 15 and 16 sites), so ment throughout Solar System history [1,2]. Although the information obtained on crustal thickness and man- the Clementine and Lunar Prospector missions have in tle structure may not be globally representative. There recent years greatly added to our knowledge of the is now a pressing need for a more widely-spaced net- geochemical and mineralogical makeup of the lunar work of lunar seismic stations, including stations at surface, and these observations will soon be supple- high latitudes and on the farside.
    [Show full text]
  • MTGC] Constraining Spacetime Torsion with the Moon and Mercury Theoretical Predictions and Experimental Limits on New Gravitational Physics
    Constraining Spacetime Torsion with Lunar Laser Ranging, Mercury Radar Ranging, LAGEOS, next lunar surface missions and BepiColombo Riccardo March1,3, Giovanni Belletini2,3, Roberto Tauraso2,3, Simone Dell’Agnello3,* 1 Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo (IAC), CNR, Via dei Taurini 19, 00185 Roma, Italy 2 Dipart. di Matematica, Univ. di Roma “Tor Vergata”, via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma, Italy 3 Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (INFN-LNF), Via Enrico Fermi 40, Frascati (Rome), 00044, Italy 17th International Laser Workshop on Laser Ranging - Bad Koetzting, Germany, May 16-20, 2011 * Presented by S. Dell’Agnello Outline • Introduction • Spacetime torsion predictions • Constraints with Moon and Mercury • Constraints with the LAser GEOdynamics Satellite (LAGEOS) • LLR prospects and opportunities • Conclusions • In the spare slides: further reference material • See also talk of Claudio Cantone (ETRUSCO-2), talk and poster by Alessandro Boni (LAGEOS Sector, Hollow reflector) and, especially, the talk of Doug Currie (LLR for the 21st century) 17th Workshop on Laser Ranging. Germany May 16, 2011 R. March, G. Bellettini, R. Tauraso, S. Dell’Agnello 2 INFN (brief and partial overview) • INFN; public research institute – Main mission: study of fundamental forces (including gravity), particle, nuclear and astroparticle physics and of its technological and industrial applications (SLR, LLR, GNSS, space geodesy…) • Prominent participation in major astroparticle physics missions: – FERMI, PAMELA, AGILE (all launched) – AMS-02, to be launched by STS-134 Endeavor to the International Space Station (ISS) on May 16, 2011 • VIRGO, gravitational wave interferometer (teamed up with LIGO) • …. More, see http://www.infn.it 17th Workshop on Laser Ranging.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor
    FROM THE EDITOR he fIrst thing I did when we click away on the computer keys, arrived home from vacation he spins around on his activity wheel Tthe other day was to look in and we both savor the classical music the den. from the stereo in the background. "The rat is still alive," I whispered At least, I think I saw him smile the to Kate, my wife. other day. "The rat" is Marvin, our 2-year- A few months ago, a French old pet hamster. Marvin joined our cable TV crew came to our house family two years ago. I was out of to document the life of a part-time town at a professional conference telecommuter. While most ofthe when Maggie, then 2, and Casey, then report focused on me typing away at 5, talked Kate into the purchase. the computer, there were fIve bizarre Casey was allowed to name the seconds of Marvin spinning around On the cover: With such rodent; she still can't explain where on his wheel. huge exposure in more than 120 countries, HP is turning she came up with the name. The analogy was eerie. the corner on sponsorships As animals go, hamsters rank right Sadly, while 2 is an extremely for many diverse sports up there with turtles and goldfIsh as young age for most ofus, it's typically teams. Team Jordan's Rubens Barrichello is shown low-maintenance pets. A little water, a lifetime for hamsters. So Kate and turning hard enough to get some hamster food and a spinning I are preparing to explain the eventu­ daylight under a tire of his activity wheel will keep a hamster ality of death to Casey and Maggie.
    [Show full text]
  • Rideshare and the Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle: the Key to Low-Cost Lagrange-Point Missions
    SSC15-II-5 Rideshare and the Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle: the Key to Low-cost Lagrange-point Missions Chris Pearson, Marissa Stender, Christopher Loghry, Joe Maly, Valentin Ivanitski Moog Integrated Systems 1113 Washington Avenue, Suite 300, Golden, CO, 80401; 303 216 9777, extension 204 [email protected] Mina Cappuccio, Darin Foreman, Ken Galal, David Mauro NASA Ames Research Center PO Box 1000, M/S 213-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000; 650 604 1313 [email protected] Keats Wilkie, Paul Speth, Trevor Jackson, Will Scott NASA Langley Research Center 4 West Taylor Street, Mail Stop 230, Hampton, VA, 23681; 757 864 420 [email protected] ABSTRACT Rideshare is a well proven approach, in both LEO and GEO, enabling low-cost space access through splitting of launch charges between multiple passengers. Demand exists from users to operate payloads at Lagrange points, but a lack of regular rides results in a deficiency in rideshare opportunities. As a result, such mission architectures currently rely on a costly dedicated launch. NASA and Moog have jointly studied the technical feasibility, risk and cost of using an Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle (OMV) to offer Lagrange point rideshare opportunities. This OMV would be launched as a secondary passenger on a commercial rocket into Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO) and utilize the Moog ESPA secondary launch adapter. The OMV is effectively a free flying spacecraft comprising a full suite of avionics and a propulsion system capable of performing GTO to Lagrange point transfer via a weak stability boundary orbit. In addition to traditional OMV ’tug’ functionality, scenarios using the OMV to host payloads for operation at the Lagrange points have also been analyzed.
    [Show full text]
  • Moonlite: a UK-Led Mission to the Moon Downloaded from by Guest on 24 September 2021
    CRAWFORD, SMITH: MOONLITE MoonLITE: A UK-led mission to the Moon Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/49/3/3.11/218588 by guest on 24 September 2021 Ian 1: Farside view of the Moon Crawford as seen by the and Alan Clementine spacecraft. Smith Penetrators discuss the launched by the MoonLITE orbiter scientific would allow surface objectives of investigations in areas not visited by Luna, the proposed Surveyor or Apollo missions. MoonLITE mission. (NASA/JPL/USGS) hile the surface missions to during the Apollo programme (see Wiec- the Moon of the 1960s and 1970s zorek et al. 2006, for a review). Moreover, the Wachieved a great deal, scientifically recent remote-sensing missions have themselves much was also left unresolved. The recent ABSTRACT raised questions that will require new surface plethora of lunar missions (flown or proposed) measurements for their resolution, of which reflects a resurgence in interest in the Moon, not MoonLITE is a proposal for a UK-led one of the most important is the circumstantial only in its own right, but also as a recorder of mission to the Moon that will place four evidence for water ice, and by implication other the early history of the Earth–Moon system and penetrators in the lunar surface in order volatiles, within permanently shaded craters at of the interplanetary environment 1 AU from the to make geochemical and geophysical the lunar poles (Feldman et al. 1998). Sun (e.g. Spudis 1996, Crawford 2004, Jolliff measurements that are impossible from In order to make significant further progress et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Langley Research Center Dedicated As Vertical Flight Heritage Site N Friday, May 8 (The W
    NASA Langley Research Center Dedicated as Vertical Flight Heritage Site n Friday, May 8 (the W. F. Durand. The paper states day after Forum 71), “The gravest charge against ONASA Langley Research the helicopter is its lack of hosted a ceremony for the means of making a safe recognition of the Center as descent when the engine has an AHS International Vertical stopped.” It disproved two Flight Heritage Site. The common misperceptions that ceremony featured remarks the parachute effect of the by NASA Administrator, stopped blades or the blades Charles Bolden; Associate spinning backwards could Administrator for Aeronautics, create a safe landing. It then Jaiwon Shin; Acting Center provided a mathematical Director Dave Bowles; US treatment of the principle Congressman Scott Rigell (via of autorotation. This video); the Honorable George principle was later to be a Wallace, Mayor of the City of major feature in Juan de la Hampton; and AHS Executive Cierva’s autogyro work and, Director Mike Hirschberg. Sikorsky YR-4B in the NACA Langley Full Scale Wind Tunnel in 1944. (All eventually, in satisfactory NASA debuted a photos courtesy of NASA) helicopter behavior following historical overview video of a power failure. This 1920 NASA Langley’s rotorcraft be dedicated since AHS began the technical publication even contributions created specifically for the Vertical Flight Heritage Sites Program demonstrated some understanding of event. Administrator Bolden predicted in 2013. The initiative is intended to twist and rotor inflow considerations. the impact that vertical flight aircraft recognize and help preserve sites of Throughout the years, Langley would have on relieving ground traffic the most noteworthy and significant researchers continued exploring the congestion in the future, citing the long contributions made in both the theory complex problem of vertical flight.
    [Show full text]
  • ESA Bulletin February 2003
    SMART-1/2 3/3/03 3:56 PM Page 14 Science A Solar-Powered Visit to the Moon “As the first spacecraft to use primary electric propulsion in conjunction with gravity manoeuvres,and as Europe’s first mission to the Moon, SMART-1 opens up new horizons in space engineering and scientific discovery.Moreover,we promise frequent news and pictures,so that everyone can share in our lunar adventure.” Giuseppe Racca, ESA’s Smart-1 Project Manager. 14 SMART-1/2 3/3/03 3:56 PM Page 15 SMART-1 The SMART-1 Mission Giuseppe Racca, Bernard Foing, and the SMART-1 Project Team ESA Directorate of Scientific Programmes, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands y July 2003 a hitchhiking team of engineers and scientists will be at Europe’s spaceport at Kourou in French Guiana, thumbing Ba lift for a neat little spacecraft, ESA’s SMART-1, on the next Ariane-5 launcher that has room to spare. It’s not very big - just a box a metre wide with folded solar panels attached - and six strong men could lift it. It weighs less than 370 kilograms, compared with thousands of kilos for Ariane’s usual customers’satellites. So it should pose no problems as an auxiliary passenger. SMART stands for Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology. They pave the way for the novel and ambitious science projects of the future, by testing the new technologies that will be needed. But a SMART project is also required to be cheap - about one- fifth of the cost of a major science mission for ESA - which is why SMART-1 has no launcher of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Npl Fact Sheets (Initial Title)
    Region 3: Mid-Atlantic Region Hazardous Site Cleanup Division Serving: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia Recent Additions | Contact Us | Print Version Search: EPA Home > OSWER Home > Region 3 HSCD > Virginia Superfund Sites > Langley Air Force Base > Current Site Information Superfund Current Site Information (NPL Pad) Brownfields / Redevelopment Langley Air Force Base / NASA Langley Initiatives Research Center Administrative Record EPA Region 3 EPA ID# VA2800005033 Last Update: May 2000 Virginia Risk Assessment / Hampton 2nd Congressional District Other Names: None RBC Tables Resources / State Links Current Site Status Specialist Listing Several sites are currently in the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) stage. Records of Decision have been signed by Oil Pollution NASA and the EPA for the Area E Warehouse Operable Unit (OU) and the Tabbs Creek OU. Two Records of Decision have been Freedom of signed for the LAFB. Dredging of soils contaminated with PCBs Information Act (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) and PCTs (Polychlorinated Terphenyls) Requests (FOIA) along Tabbs Creek began in December 1999 and should take six to eight months to complete. Site Description The Langley Air Force Base (LAFB)/NASA Langley Research Center (NASA LaRC) site in Hampton, Virginia consists of two Federal facilities. LAFB covers 3,152 acres, has been an airfield and aeronautical research center since 1917, and is the home base for the First Fighter Wing. NASA LaRC is consists of 787 acres and is a research facility that conducts numerous operations in nearly 200 buildings and 40 wind tunnels. Wastes generated at LAFB include petroleum, oils and lubricants, fuels, solvents, paints, pesticides, photographic chemicals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals.
    [Show full text]