DOCSLIB.ORG

4.7 Christmas Island Pipistrelle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4.7 Christmas Island Pipistrelle FINAL REPORT OF THE CHRISTMAS ISLAND EXPERT WORKING GROUP TO THE MINISTER FOR ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, HERITAGE AND THE ARTS Red crabs, Christmas Island – Photo by Max Orchard Expert Working Group members Associate Professor Bob Beeton (Chair) Dr Andrew Burbidge Professor Gordon Grigg Professor Peter Harrison Dr Ric How Dr Bill Humphreys Mr Norm McKenzie Dr John Woinarski Secretariat Ms Anne-Marie Delahunt from February 2009 to October 2009 Ms Kerry Cameron from February 2009 to June 2009 Mr Harry Abrahams from October 2009 to March 2010 Ms Meryl Triggs from February 2009 to March 2010 1 April 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations...................................................................................................... 12 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 18 1.1 Initial Terms of Reference of the working group ............................................... 18 1.2 Amended Membership and Amended Terms of Reference .............................. 19 2.0 APPROACH TO ADDRESSING THE TERMS OF REFERENCE.......................... 19 2.1 Phase 1 .................................................................................................................. 19 2.2 Phase 2 .................................................................................................................. 21 3.0 CHRISTMAS ISLAND OVERVIEW ........................................................................ 21 3.1 Background information ...................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Biophysical ....................................................................................................... 21 3.2 Social and Economic Matters .............................................................................. 23 3.2.1 Island Tenure and Governance........................................................................ 24 3.3 Biological............................................................................................................... 24 3.3.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 24 3.3.2 Biodiversity Values ........................................................................................... 29 3.3.3 Ecological uniqueness and ecological shift ...................................................... 29 3.3.4 Biosecurity........................................................................................................ 32 4.0 SPECIFIC ISSUES CONSIDERED BY THE WORKING GROUP ......................... 34 4.1 Natural Dynamics of Oceanic Islands................................................................. 34 4.2 Securing Christmas Island against further invasions ....................................... 35 4.2.1 Governance and Quarantine ............................................................................ 35 4.3 Christmas Island research and monitoring ........................................................ 36 4.3.1 Scientific Research Priorities, Quality Assurance and Coordination ................ 37 4.3.2 Biodiversity Monitoring on Christmas Island..................................................... 38 4.4 Yellow Crazy Ant Management............................................................................ 40 2 4.5 General threats to endemic and other native species....................................... 41 4.5.1 Ecological shifts and associated cascade effects............................................. 41 4.5.2 Predation .......................................................................................................... 41 4.5.2.1 Cats (feral and domestic)........................................................................... 41 4.5.2.2 Rats ........................................................................................................... 42 4.5.2.3 Other introduced species........................................................................... 44 4.5.2.4 Potential Introductions ............................................................................... 44 4.5.3 Fipronil toxicity.................................................................................................. 45 4.5.4 Disease............................................................................................................. 45 4.5.5 Fire ................................................................................................................... 47 4.5.6 Land Clearance and Soil Removal................................................................... 47 4.5.7 Water................................................................................................................ 50 4.6 Conservation status of endemic species ........................................................... 51 4.7 Christmas Island Pipistrelle................................................................................. 51 4.8 Reptiles .................................................................................................................. 53 4.8.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 53 4.8.2 Population Declines in Native Reptile Species................................................. 54 4.8.3 Likely causes of decline.................................................................................... 56 4.8.4 Conclusions...................................................................................................... 56 4.9 Conservation of Christmas Island birds ............................................................. 57 4.9.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 57 4.9.2 Status, trends, threats and management priorities........................................... 58 4.10 Christmas Island Flying-Fox.............................................................................. 67 4.11 Christmas Island land crabs .............................................................................. 70 4.11.1 Red Crabs, Gecarcoidea natalis..................................................................... 70 4.11.2 Robber Crabs, Birgus latro............................................................................. 77 4.12 Flora and Vegetation........................................................................................... 80 4.12.1 Vegetation communities ................................................................................. 80 4.12.2 Weeds ............................................................................................................ 81 4.12.3 Native plant species of conservation concern ................................................ 81 4.12.4 Priorities for conservation of plants and vegetation communities................... 83 4.13 Other taxa ............................................................................................................ 84 4.14 Marine environment............................................................................................ 85 4.15 Subterranean Fauna ........................................................................................... 86 5.0 CONSIDERATION OF CHRISTMAS ISLAND AS A CONSERVATION ENTITY.. 87 5.1 Recognition of a unique place............................................................................. 87 5.2 Communicating Christmas Island’s Values ....................................................... 87 3 6.0 FINDINGS WITH WIDER APPLICABILITY............................................................ 87 7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................... 91 8.0 REFERENCES........................................................................................................ 92 9.0 GLOSSARY.......................................................................................................... 102 APPENDIX 1 CHRISTMAS ISLAND PIPISTRELLE.................................................. 104 4.7.1 Taxonomic Status........................................................................................... 104 4.7.2 Christmas Island Pipistrelle conservation status ............................................ 105 4.7.3 Christmas Island Pipistrelle biology................................................................ 106 4.7.4 Eco-physiology of Christmas Island Pipistrelle............................................... 107 4.7.5 Analysis of Christmas Island Pipistrelle Monitoring Data ............................... 108 4.7.6 Causes of Christmas Island Pipistrelle decline............................................... 114 4.7.6.1 Predation ................................................................................................. 114 4.7.6.2 Yellow Crazy Ants.................................................................................... 114 4.7.6.3 Wolf Snakes............................................................................................. 114 4.7.6.4 Rats and Cats .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Lead Tree (Leucaena Leucocephala)
    UF/IFAS Extension Hernando County Fact Sheet 2015-03 White Lead Tree (Leucaena leucocephala) Dr. William Lester, Extension Agent II • Email: [email protected] Lead tree is the common name for all members of the Leucaena genus. White lead tree refers to this particular tree’s whitish blossoms. The lead tree is native to Mexico and Central America, but it is cultivated throughout the tropics, and it has widely escaped and naturalized. In the United States, it has been reported as an adventive from Arizona, California, Florida, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Texas and the Virgin Islands. In Hernando County the tree is mostly located along the coast, but has been found growing in alkaline soils further inland. White lead tree grows best in full sunlight and can reach heights of up to 60 feet. The leaves are alternately arranged, bipinnately compound, and typically 10 inches in length. Each leaflet is ½ inch long and spear-shaped. The bark is lightly textured and grayish-brown in color when mature. Flowers are white and grow in globe-shaped clusters at the ends of the branches, with each cluster being less than 1 inch wide. Fruits are 4- to 6-inch-long, flat pods that are 1–2 inches wide. Pods have raised edges, turn from green to brown with maturity, and contain 10–30 oval-shaped, brown seeds. In Florida, white leadtree is considered a category II invasive species, and has the potential to displace native plant communities because it is an aggressive competitor for resources. As a result, the Division of Plant Industry strictly prohibits possessing (including collecting), transporting (including importing), and cultivating this species.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsustainable Food Systems Threaten Wild Crop and Dolphin Species
    INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until: 07:00 GMT (16:00 JST) 5 December 2017 Elaine Paterson, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Goska Bonnaveira, IUCN Media Relations, m +41 792760185, email [email protected] [In Japan] Cheryl-Samantha MacSharry, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Download photographs here Download summary statistics here Unsustainable food systems threaten wild crop and dolphin species Tokyo, Japan, 5 December 2017 (IUCN) – Species of wild rice, wheat and yam are threatened by overly intensive agricultural production and urban expansion, whilst poor fishing practices have caused steep declines in the Irrawaddy Dolphin and Finless Porpoise, according to the latest update of The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Today’s Red List update also reveals that a drying climate is pushing the Ringtail Possum to the brink of extinction. Three reptile species found only on an Australian island – the Christmas Island Whiptail-skink, the Blue- tailed Skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and the Lister’s Gecko – have gone extinct, according to the update. But in New Zealand, conservation efforts have improved the situation for two species of Kiwi. “Healthy, species-rich ecosystems are fundamental to our ability to feed the world’s growing population and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 – to end hunger by 2030,” says IUCN Director General Inger Andersen. “Wild crop species, for example, maintain genetic diversity of agricultural crops
    [Show full text]
  • ONEP V09.Pdf
    Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern OEPP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume nine OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 60/1 SOI PIBULWATTANA VII, RAMA VI RD., BANGKOK 10400 THAILAND TEL. (662) 2797180, 2714232, 2797186-9 FAX. (662) 2713226 Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 First published : September 2000 by Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP), Thailand. ISBN : 974–87704–3–5 This publication is financially supported by OEPP and may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non–profit purposes without special permission from OEPP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation : Nabhitabhata J., Chan ard T., Chuaynkern Y. 2000. Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. Authors : Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan–ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern National Science Museum Available from : Biological Resources Section Natural Resources and Environmental Management Division Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Science Technology and Environment 60/1 Rama VI Rd. Bangkok 10400 THAILAND Tel. (662) 271–3251, 279–7180, 271–4232–8 279–7186–9 ext 226, 227 Facsimile (662) 279–8088, 271–3251 Designed & Printed :Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Tel. (662) 585–2076, 586–0837, 913–7761–2 Facsimile (662) 913–7763 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Policy, Law, Management, Research, and Advocacy Failings to the Recent Extinctions of Three Australian Vertebrate Species
    This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Woinarski, J. C. Z., Garnett, S. T., Legge, S. M., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2017). The contribution of policy, law, management, research, and advocacy failings to the recent extinctions of three Australian vertebrate species. Conservation Biology, 31(1), 13-23; which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12852 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. The contribution of policy, law, management, research, and advocacy failings to the recent extinctions of three Australian vertebrate species John C.Z. Woinarski,*,a Stephen T. Garnett,* Sarah M. Legge,* † David B. Lindenmayer ‡ * Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environment Science Programme, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia, † Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environment Science Programme, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia ‡ Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environment Science Programme, Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia aemail [email protected] Keywords: Bramble Cay melomys, Christmas Island forest skink, Christmas Island pipistrelle, conservation policy, inquest, legislation, threatened species Running head: Extinction contributing factors Abstract Extinctions typically have ecological drivers, such as habitat loss. However, extinction events are also influenced by policy and management settings that may be antithetical to biodiversity conservation, inadequate to prevent extinction, insufficiently resourced, or poorly implemented. Three endemic Australian vertebrate species – the Christmas Island pipistrelle (Pipistrellus murrayi), Bramble Cay melomys (Melomys rubicola), and Christmas Island forest skink (Emoia nativitatis) – became extinct from 2009 to 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique’S Actions on IAS
    1 Bioinvasion and Global Environmental Governance: The Transnational Policy Network on Invasive Alien Species Mozambique’s Actions on IAS Description1 Mozambique, officially the Republic of Mozambique, is a country in southeastern Africa bordered by the Indian Ocean to the east, Tanzania to the north, Malawi and Zambia to the northwest, Zimbabwe to the west and Swaziland and South Africa to the southwest. Geographically, the country is divided into two topographical regions by the Zambezi River, with hills and plateaus to the north and lowlands to the south. Mozambique has a tropical climate with two seasons, a wet season from October to March and a dry season from April to September. Almost five centuries as a Portuguese colony came to a close with independence in 1975. Large-scale emigration, economic dependence on South Africa, a severe drought, and a prolonged civil war hindered the country's development until the mid 1990's. The ruling Front for the Liberation of Mozambique (FRELIMO) party formally abandoned Marxism in 1989, and a new constitution the following year provided for multiparty elections and a free market economy. Although reforms since 1994 have improved the economic situation of many, the majority of the 21 million population remains below the poverty line. Subsistence agriculture continues to employ the vast majority of the country's work force. Mozambique is a member of the Community of Portuguese Language Countries and the Commonwealth of Nations, and an observer of the Francophonie. Overview of Biodiversity Mozambique possesses sites of high importance in regard to biodiversity such as the Gorongosa Mountains, the Great Inselberg Archipelago of Quirimbas in Northern Mozambique, and the Chimanimani Massif.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarantulas and Social Spiders
    Tarantulas and Social Spiders: A Tale of Sex and Silk by Jonathan Bull BSc (Hons) MSc ICL Thesis Presented to the Institute of Biology of The University of Nottingham in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Nottingham May 2012 DEDICATION To my parents… …because they both said to dedicate it to the other… I dedicate it to both ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Sara Goodacre for her guidance and support. I am also hugely endebted to Dr Keith Spriggs who became my mentor in the field of RNA and without whom my understanding of the field would have been but a fraction of what it is now. Particular thanks go to Professor John Brookfield, an expert in the field of biological statistics and data retrieval. Likewise with Dr Susan Liddell for her proteomics assistance, a truly remarkable individual on par with Professor Brookfield in being able to simplify even the most complex techniques and analyses. Finally, I would really like to thank Janet Beccaloni for her time and resources at the Natural History Museum, London, permitting me access to the collections therein; ten years on and still a delight. Finally, amongst the greats, Alexander ‘Sasha’ Kondrashov… a true inspiration. I would also like to express my gratitude to those who, although may not have directly contributed, should not be forgotten due to their continued assistance and considerate nature: Dr Chris Wade (five straight hours of help was not uncommon!), Sue Buxton (direct to my bench creepy crawlies), Sheila Keeble (ventures and cleans where others dare not), Alice Young (read/checked my thesis and overcame her arachnophobia!) and all those in the Centre for Biomolecular Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Orchid Species of Odisha State, India. with Note on the Medicinal and Economic Uses
    Diversity of orchid species of Odisha state, India. With note on the medicinal and economic uses Sanjeet Kumar1*, Sweta Mishra1 & Arun Kumar Mishra2 ________________________________ 1Biodiversity and Conservation Lab., Ambika Prasad Research Foundation, India 2Divisional Forest Office, Rairangpur, Odisha, India * author for correspondence: [email protected] ________________________________ Abstract The state of Odisha is home to a great floral and faunistic wealth with diverse landscapes. It enjoys almost all types of vegetations. Among its floral wealth, the diversity of orchids plays an important role. They are known for their beautiful flowers having ecological values. An extensive survey in the field done from 2009 to 2020 in different areas of the state, supported by information found in the literature and by the material kept in the collections of local herbariums, allows us to propose, in this article, a list of 160 species belonging to 50 different genera. Furthermore, endemism, conservation aspects, medicinal and economic values of some of them are discussed. Résumé L'État d'Odisha abrite une grande richesse florale et faunistique avec des paysages variés. Il bénéficie de presque tous les types de végétations. Parmi ses richesses florales, la diversité des orchidées joue un rôle important. Ces dernières sont connues pour leurs belles fleurs ayant une valeurs écologiques. Une étude approfondie réalisée sur le terrain de 2009 à 2020 Manuscrit reçu le 04/09/2020 Article mis en ligne le 21/02/2021 – pp. 1-26 dans différentes zones de l'état, appuyée par des informations trouvées dans la littérature et par le matériel conservé dans les collections d'herbiers locaux, nous permettent de proposer, dans cet article, une liste de 160 espèces appartenant à 50 genres distincts.
    [Show full text]
  • Range Extensions of Lycodon Capucinus BOIE, 1827 in Eastern
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Herpetozoa Jahr/Year: 2004 Band/Volume: 17_3_4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuch Ulrich, McGuire Jimmy A. Artikel/Article: Range Extensions of Lycodon capucinus BOIE, 1827 in eastern Indonesia 191-193 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 17 (3/4) Wien, 30. Dezember 2004 SHORT NOTE 191 Wiebeisheim (Aula). CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC, J. & China, the Philippines, and Indonesia (DE ALEKSIC, I. (1999): First record of Coluber najadum Roou 1917; DE HAAS 1950; BOSCH 1985; EICHWALD (1831) in Serbia.-Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade; 51 (3): 47P-48P. DIMOVSKI, A. (1963): Herpetofauna ISKANDAR & COLIJN 2001). A recent colo- na skopska kotlina. I - zoogeografski i ekoloski pre- nization of Christmas Island, about 320 km gled.- Godisen zbornik Prirodno-matematickog fakul- south of Java, was reported by L. A. SMITH teta, Univerziteta u Skoplju, Skoplje; knjiga 14, (1988). In eastern Indonesia, L. capucinus Biologija2: 189-221. DIMOVSKI, A. (1966): Herpeto- fauna na skopska kotlina. II - faunisticki del.- Godisen has been known from central, southwestern, zbornik Prirodno-matematickog fakulteta, Univerziteta and southeastern Sulawesi (DE ROOU 1917; u Skoplju, Skoplje; knjiga 16, Biologija 4: 179-188. ISKANDAR & TJAN 1996) and from the DZUKIC, G (1972): Herpetoloska zbirka Prirodnjackog Lesser Sunda Islands of Sumbawa, Sumba, muzeja u Beogradu. (Herpetological collection of the Belgrade museum of natural history).- Glasnik Savu, Roti, Timor, Flores, Lomblem, Alor, Prirodnjackog muzeja, Beograd; (Ser. B) 27: 165-180. Lembata, and Wetar (DE ROOU 1917; How et DZUKIC, G (1995): Diverzitet vodozemaca (Amphibia) al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimosine Concentration in Leucaena Leucocephala Under Various Environmental Conditions
    Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales (2019) Vol. 7(2):164–172 164 DOI: 10.17138/TGFT(7)164-172 ILC2018 Keynote paper* Mimosine concentration in Leucaena leucocephala under various environmental conditions Concentración de mimosina en Leucaena leucocephala bajo diferentes condiciones ambientales MICHAEL D.H. HONDA AND DULAL BORTHAKUR Department of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA. manoa.hawaii.edu Abstract Leucaena leucocephala (leucaena) is a multipurpose tropical tree-legume that is highly resistant to many biotic and abiotic stresses. Leucaena is used primarily as an animal fodder owing to its protein-rich foliage. However, leucaena foliage also contains mimosine, a toxic non-protein amino acid that can cause alopecia, goiter and other thyroid problems, infertility and fetal death. Considering its toxicity and abundance in leucaena, it is important to quantify the mimosine concentrations in leucaena under different environmental conditions. Mimosine was extracted from various types of leucaena tissue exposed to a range of environmental conditions and then quantified by HPLC. The mimosine concentrations in leucaena treated with NaCl increased after 6 days of treatment and remained relatively high when treatment continued for 18 days. Interestingly, leucaena exposed to complete darkness for up to 5 days had a higher mimosine concentration than control plants exposed to normal light/dark photoperiods. On the other hand, drying leucaena leaflets or macerating them in an alkaline buffer significantly lowered their mimosine concentration. Mature leaflets that had fallen off the plant and dried out also contained significantly less mimosine than fresh leaflets. The results of this study indicate that mimosine concentrations in leucaena are affected by environmental conditions and this knowledge can assist in managing to prevent toxicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny, Character Evolution and the Systematics of Psilochilus (Triphoreae)
    THE PRIMITIVE EPIDENDROIDEAE (ORCHIDACEAE): PHYLOGENY, CHARACTER EVOLUTION AND THE SYSTEMATICS OF PSILOCHILUS (TRIPHOREAE) A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Erik Paul Rothacker, M.Sc. ***** The Ohio State University 2007 Doctoral Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John V. Freudenstein, Adviser Dr. John Wenzel ________________________________ Dr. Andrea Wolfe Adviser Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology Graduate Program COPYRIGHT ERIK PAUL ROTHACKER 2007 ABSTRACT Considering the significance of the basal Epidendroideae in understanding patterns of morphological evolution within the subfamily, it is surprising that no fully resolved hypothesis of historical relationships has been presented for these orchids. This is the first study to improve both taxon and character sampling. The phylogenetic study of the basal Epidendroideae consisted of two components, molecular and morphological. A molecular phylogeny using three loci representing each of the plant genomes including gap characters is presented for the basal Epidendroideae. Here we find Neottieae sister to Palmorchis at the base of the Epidendroideae, followed by Triphoreae. Tropidieae and Sobralieae form a clade, however the relationship between these, Nervilieae and the advanced Epidendroids has not been resolved. A morphological matrix of 40 taxa and 30 characters was constructed and a phylogenetic analysis was performed. The results support many of the traditional views of tribal composition, but do not fully resolve relationships among many of the tribes. A robust hypothesis of relationships is presented based on the results of a total evidence analysis using three molecular loci, gap characters and morphology. Palmorchis is placed at the base of the tree, sister to Neottieae, followed successively by Triphoreae sister to Epipogium, then Sobralieae.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Climbing Speed Explains the Evolution of Extreme Sexual Size Dimorphism in Spiders
    doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01707.x Optimal climbing speed explains the evolution of extreme sexual size dimorphism in spiders J. MOYA-LARAN˜ O,*D.VINKOVIC´ , C. M. ALLARDà &M.W.FOELLMER§ *Departamento de Ecologı´a Funcional y Evolutiva, Estacio´n Experimental de Zonas A´ ridas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas, General Segura, Almerı´a, Spain Physics Department, University of Split, Split, Croatia àDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA §Department of Biology, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY, USA Keywords: Abstract Araneomorphae; Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the evolution of extreme biomechanics; sexual size dimorphism (SSD). Among them, the gravity hypothesis (GH) dwarf males; explains that extreme SSD has evolved in spiders because smaller males have a gravity hypothesis; mating or survival advantage by climbing faster. However, few studies have mate search; supported this hypothesis thus far. Using a wide span of spider body sizes, we muscle physiology; show that there is an optimal body size (7.4 mm) for climbing and that scramble competition; extreme SSD evolves only in spiders that: (1) live in high-habitat patches and sexual size dimorphism; (2) in which females are larger than the optimal size. We report that the spiders; evidence for the GH across studies depends on whether the body size of stabilizing selection. individuals expands beyond the optimal climbing size. We also present an ad hoc biomechanical model that shows how the higher stride frequency of small animals predicts an optimal body size for climbing. range of SSD in spiders (Araneae) (Head, 1995; Vollrath, Introduction 1998; Hormiga et al., 2000; Foellmer & Moya-Laran˜ o, Understanding the evolution of different phenotypes in 2007).
    [Show full text]