DOCSLIB.ORG

Interim Report | Christmas Island Expert Working Group | 2009 (PDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interim Report | Christmas Island Expert Working Group | 2009 (PDF Revised Interim Report Christmas Island Expert Working Group to Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts Red crabs, Christmas Island – Photo by Max Orchard Expert Working Group members Associate Professor Bob Beeton (Chair) Dr Andrew Burbidge Professor Gordon Grigg Dr Ric How Mr Norm McKenzie Dr John Woinarski Secretariat Ms Anne-Marie Delahunt Ms Kerry Cameron Ms Meryl Triggs 28 June 2009 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS.......................................................................................... 2 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 5 What has happened on Christmas Island?..................................................................................... 6 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 7 Recommendations Level 1: Protecting the integrity of the island and better environmental governance ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Recommendations Level 2: Management of the island’s ecological processes so as to prevent further loss of biodiversity ............................................................................................... 10 Christmas Island Pipistrelle ........................................................................................................... 12 Tropicbirds..................................................................................................................................... 13 Highly Threatened Endemic Reptiles ............................................................................................ 13 Giant Centipedes and African Land Snails.................................................................................... 13 Scale Insect – Yellow Crazy Ant Nexus ........................................................................................ 13 Conserving Christmas Island as an Entity..................................................................................... 13 Communicating the Problem and Management Responses......................................................... 14 Findings with wider applicability .................................................................................................... 14 LIST OF FIGURES................................................................................................ 15 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. 16 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 17 1.1 Terms of Reference of the working group.............................................................................. 17 2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ 17 3.0 CHRISTMAS ISLAND OVERVIEW................................................................. 20 3.1 Background information........................................................................................................... 20 3.1.1 Biophysical ........................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Social Economic........................................................................................................................ 22 3.2.1 Island Tenure and Governance............................................................................................ 22 3.3 Biological ................................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Biodiversity Values ............................................................................................................... 27 3.3.3 Ecological uniqueness and ecological shift.......................................................................... 27 3.3.4 Biosecurity (Background) ..................................................................................................... 29 2 4.0 SPECIFIC ISSUES CONSIDERED BY THE WORKING GROUP.................. 32 4.1 Natural Dynamics of Oceanic Islands..................................................................................... 32 4.2 Securing Christmas Island against further invasions........................................................... 32 4.2.1 Governance and Quarantine................................................................................................ 32 4.3 Christmas Island research and monitoring............................................................................ 33 4.3.1 Research Management........................................................................................................ 34 4.3.2 Biodiversity Monitoring on Christmas Island ........................................................................ 34 4.4 Yellow Crazy Ant Management................................................................................................ 36 4.5 General threats to endemic and other native species........................................................... 36 4.5.1 Ecological shift and associated cascade effects.................................................................. 36 4.5.2 Predation .............................................................................................................................. 37 4.5.2.1 Cats ............................................................................................................................... 37 4.5.2.2 Rats ............................................................................................................................... 37 4.5.2.3 Other introduced species .............................................................................................. 38 4.5.2.4 Potential Introductions................................................................................................... 38 4.5.3 Fipronil toxicity...................................................................................................................... 38 4.5.4 Disease ................................................................................................................................39 4.5.5 Fire ....................................................................................................................................... 40 4.5.6 Land Clearance.................................................................................................................... 41 4.5.7 Water use ............................................................................................................................. 41 4.6 Conservation status of endemic species ............................................................................... 41 4.7 Christmas Island Pipistrelle ..................................................................................................... 41 4.7.1 Taxonomic Status................................................................................................................. 41 4.7.2 Christmas Island Pipistrelle conservation status.................................................................. 42 4.7.3 Christmas Island Pipistrelle biology ..................................................................................... 43 4.7.4 Eco-physiology of Christmas Island Pipistrelle .................................................................... 44 4.7.5 Analysis of Christmas Island Pipistrelle Monitoring Data..................................................... 45 4.7.5 Causes of Christmas Island Pipistrelle decline .................................................................... 51 4.7.5.1 Predation....................................................................................................................... 51 4.7.5.2 Yellow Crazy Ants ......................................................................................................... 51 4.7.5.3 Wolf Snakes .................................................................................................................. 52 4.7.5.4 Rats and Cats................................................................................................................ 52 4.7.5.5 Nankeen Kestrels.......................................................................................................... 52 4.7.5.6 Giant Centipede ............................................................................................................ 52 4.7.5.7 Fipronil toxicity............................................................................................................... 54 4.7.5.8 Food availability and population changes in prey items ............................................... 54 4.7.5.9 Disease ......................................................................................................................... 55 4.7.5.10 Changes to surface water ........................................................................................... 56 4.7.5.11 Structural vegetation change ...................................................................................... 56 4.7.6 Working group’s conclusions on the Christmas Island Pipistrelle.......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unsustainable Food Systems Threaten Wild Crop and Dolphin Species
    INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE Embargoed until: 07:00 GMT (16:00 JST) 5 December 2017 Elaine Paterson, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Goska Bonnaveira, IUCN Media Relations, m +41 792760185, email [email protected] [In Japan] Cheryl-Samantha MacSharry, IUCN Media Relations, t+44 1223 331128, email [email protected] Download photographs here Download summary statistics here Unsustainable food systems threaten wild crop and dolphin species Tokyo, Japan, 5 December 2017 (IUCN) – Species of wild rice, wheat and yam are threatened by overly intensive agricultural production and urban expansion, whilst poor fishing practices have caused steep declines in the Irrawaddy Dolphin and Finless Porpoise, according to the latest update of The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™. Today’s Red List update also reveals that a drying climate is pushing the Ringtail Possum to the brink of extinction. Three reptile species found only on an Australian island – the Christmas Island Whiptail-skink, the Blue- tailed Skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and the Lister’s Gecko – have gone extinct, according to the update. But in New Zealand, conservation efforts have improved the situation for two species of Kiwi. “Healthy, species-rich ecosystems are fundamental to our ability to feed the world’s growing population and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goal 2 – to end hunger by 2030,” says IUCN Director General Inger Andersen. “Wild crop species, for example, maintain genetic diversity of agricultural crops
    [Show full text]
  • ONEP V09.Pdf
    Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern OEPP BIODIVERSITY SERIES volume nine OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING MINISTRY OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT 60/1 SOI PIBULWATTANA VII, RAMA VI RD., BANGKOK 10400 THAILAND TEL. (662) 2797180, 2714232, 2797186-9 FAX. (662) 2713226 Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE NOT FOR SALE Compiled by Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan-ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern Office of Environmental Policy and Planning 2000 First published : September 2000 by Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP), Thailand. ISBN : 974–87704–3–5 This publication is financially supported by OEPP and may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non–profit purposes without special permission from OEPP, providing that acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes. Citation : Nabhitabhata J., Chan ard T., Chuaynkern Y. 2000. Checklist of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand. Office of Environmental Policy and Planning, Bangkok, Thailand. Authors : Jarujin Nabhitabhata Tanya Chan–ard Yodchaiy Chuaynkern National Science Museum Available from : Biological Resources Section Natural Resources and Environmental Management Division Office of Environmental Policy and Planning Ministry of Science Technology and Environment 60/1 Rama VI Rd. Bangkok 10400 THAILAND Tel. (662) 271–3251, 279–7180, 271–4232–8 279–7186–9 ext 226, 227 Facsimile (662) 279–8088, 271–3251 Designed & Printed :Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Tel. (662) 585–2076, 586–0837, 913–7761–2 Facsimile (662) 913–7763 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Analysis of Small Non-Volant Mammals of Mt. Makiling, Luzon Island, Philippines Anna Pauline O
    Journal of Environmental Science and Management 17(2): 63-68 (December 2014) ISSN 0119-1144 Gut Analysis of Small Non-Volant Mammals of Mt. Makiling, Luzon Island, Philippines Anna Pauline O. de Guia1 and Ma. Niña Regina M. Quibod2 ABSTRACT Three non-native species (Rattus exulans, R. tanezumi and Mus musculus) of small non-volant mammals were recorded along various elevational gradients of Mount Makiling. Invertebrate remains and plant matter comprised the bulk of their diets based on the food items identifed. The identifed plant matter were leaves and seeds while invertebrates were easily identifable through body parts such as legs, head and antennae. Other contents identifed including vertebrate remains such as hair/fur, feathers and bones, plastics, rubber, stones, and intestinal worms were noted. Based on the calculated relative abundance of each food type, there is no signifcant difference in the diets of the three non-native rodent species. Preliminary results suggest that introduced rodents in Mt. Makiling have broad diets and there are no indications that their main diet includes native wildlife species. Traces of vertebrate remains, however, may indicate potential predation on wildlife species and further studies are needed to clarify this. Key words: rodents, gut analysis, endemic, non-native, elevational gradient INTRODUCTION The complexity of tropical mountain ecosystems endemic species (Rickart et al. 2007; Ong and Rickart 2008). have long provided haven for various Philippine wildlife R. exulans and R. tanezumi have been recorded at altitudes species. The elevational gradients provide various forest of 725 – 1450 masl on Mt. Isarog (Heaney et al. 1998). S. types while vertical stratifcation of trees offer habitat murinus, R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Policy, Law, Management, Research, and Advocacy Failings to the Recent Extinctions of Three Australian Vertebrate Species
    This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Woinarski, J. C. Z., Garnett, S. T., Legge, S. M., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2017). The contribution of policy, law, management, research, and advocacy failings to the recent extinctions of three Australian vertebrate species. Conservation Biology, 31(1), 13-23; which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12852 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. The contribution of policy, law, management, research, and advocacy failings to the recent extinctions of three Australian vertebrate species John C.Z. Woinarski,*,a Stephen T. Garnett,* Sarah M. Legge,* † David B. Lindenmayer ‡ * Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environment Science Programme, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia, † Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environment Science Programme, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia ‡ Threatened Species Recovery Hub of the National Environment Science Programme, Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia aemail [email protected] Keywords: Bramble Cay melomys, Christmas Island forest skink, Christmas Island pipistrelle, conservation policy, inquest, legislation, threatened species Running head: Extinction contributing factors Abstract Extinctions typically have ecological drivers, such as habitat loss. However, extinction events are also influenced by policy and management settings that may be antithetical to biodiversity conservation, inadequate to prevent extinction, insufficiently resourced, or poorly implemented. Three endemic Australian vertebrate species – the Christmas Island pipistrelle (Pipistrellus murrayi), Bramble Cay melomys (Melomys rubicola), and Christmas Island forest skink (Emoia nativitatis) – became extinct from 2009 to 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of Small Non-Flying Mammal Communities in Disturbed Habitats in the Central Cordillera, Luzon Island, Philippines
    ARTICLE Structure of small non-flying mammal communities in disturbed habitats in the Central Cordillera, Luzon Island, Philippines Aris A. Reginaldo*1 and Perry S. Ong†2 1Department of Biology, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Governor Pack Road, Baguio City, Benguet 2600 Philippines 2Institute of Biology, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, 1101 Philippines he Central Cordillera on Luzon Island, Philippines, is native small-mammal fauna and its support of non-native home to a diverse set of small mammals. species persistence. We show that montane forest patches in Unfortunately, substantial anthropogenic perturbation disturbed landscapes are important because they act as potential occurred in the past; the effects of habitat disturbance sources of native populations that can re-establish as the forest to animal communities are yet to be determined. This regenerates. Future studies that employ similar methodology Tstudy sought to determine species richness, relative abundance, will test the generality of our findings. and macrohabitat use patterns of small non-flying mammals in patches of disturbed habitats in La Trinidad, Benguet. Our survey consisted of three trapping periods that utilized live KEYWORDS trapping and some snap trapping. Over a total of 3,551 trap nights, seven species were recorded: four native species, namely Community ecology, habitat disturbance, habitat use, Muridae, Apomys abrae, Apomys musculus, Chrotomys whiteheadi, and native mammals, non-native mammals, Soricidae, wildlife Rattus everetti, and three non-native species, namely R. exulans, biology R. tanezumi, and Suncus murinus. Overall, the number of species was low, and small mammal abundance was moderate. Across adjacent habitat types, abundance between small mammal INTRODUCTION groups and most of the species did not vary, whereas habitat use by small mammal groups and by each species varied.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites
    Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites (Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, Upper Marikina-Kaliwa Forest Reserve, Bago River Watershed and Forest Reserve, Naujan Lake National Park and Subwatersheds, Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park and Mt. Apo Natural Park) Philippines Biodiversity & Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy & Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) 23 March 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience Program is funded by the USAID, Contract No. AID-492-C-13-00002 and implemented by Chemonics International in association with: Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites Philippines Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) Program Implemented with: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Other National Government Agencies Local Government Units and Agencies Supported by: United States Agency for International Development Contract No.: AID-492-C-13-00002 Managed by: Chemonics International Inc. in partnership with Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) 23 March
    [Show full text]
  • Range Extensions of Lycodon Capucinus BOIE, 1827 in Eastern
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Herpetozoa Jahr/Year: 2004 Band/Volume: 17_3_4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Kuch Ulrich, McGuire Jimmy A. Artikel/Article: Range Extensions of Lycodon capucinus BOIE, 1827 in eastern Indonesia 191-193 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 17 (3/4) Wien, 30. Dezember 2004 SHORT NOTE 191 Wiebeisheim (Aula). CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIC, J. & China, the Philippines, and Indonesia (DE ALEKSIC, I. (1999): First record of Coluber najadum Roou 1917; DE HAAS 1950; BOSCH 1985; EICHWALD (1831) in Serbia.-Arch. Biol. Sci., Belgrade; 51 (3): 47P-48P. DIMOVSKI, A. (1963): Herpetofauna ISKANDAR & COLIJN 2001). A recent colo- na skopska kotlina. I - zoogeografski i ekoloski pre- nization of Christmas Island, about 320 km gled.- Godisen zbornik Prirodno-matematickog fakul- south of Java, was reported by L. A. SMITH teta, Univerziteta u Skoplju, Skoplje; knjiga 14, (1988). In eastern Indonesia, L. capucinus Biologija2: 189-221. DIMOVSKI, A. (1966): Herpeto- fauna na skopska kotlina. II - faunisticki del.- Godisen has been known from central, southwestern, zbornik Prirodno-matematickog fakulteta, Univerziteta and southeastern Sulawesi (DE ROOU 1917; u Skoplju, Skoplje; knjiga 16, Biologija 4: 179-188. ISKANDAR & TJAN 1996) and from the DZUKIC, G (1972): Herpetoloska zbirka Prirodnjackog Lesser Sunda Islands of Sumbawa, Sumba, muzeja u Beogradu. (Herpetological collection of the Belgrade museum of natural history).- Glasnik Savu, Roti, Timor, Flores, Lomblem, Alor, Prirodnjackog muzeja, Beograd; (Ser. B) 27: 165-180. Lembata, and Wetar (DE ROOU 1917; How et DZUKIC, G (1995): Diverzitet vodozemaca (Amphibia) al.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Native and Non-Native Rats (Rattus Spp.) Along an Elevational Gradient in a Tropical Rainforest of Southern Luzon, Philippines
    ECOTROPICA 14: 129–136, 2008 © Society for Tropical Ecology DISTRIBUTION OF NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE RATS (RATTUS SPP.) ALONG AN ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT IN A TROPICAL RAINFOREST OF SOUTHERN LUZON, PHILIPPINES Cristina C. Salibay & Hazel Anne V. Luyon De La Salle University-Dasmariñas, Dasmariñas, Cavite, Philippines Abstract. Rats (Muridae) of the genus Rattus occur in the Philippines, both as native and as invasive species. While the invasive species are well known to use a large range of anthropogenic habitats, little is known about their potential to occur in forest areas. We studied the occurrence and relative abundance of different species of Rattus in forests along elevational gradients on three mountains within the Palay-palay / Mataas na Gulod National Park in Southern Luzon, Philippines. Four Rattus species were collected and their occurrence and relative abundance were found to differ significantly between species and along elevational gradients. Rattus norvegicus (40.3% of captures), R. tanezumi (21.5%), and R. argentiventer (5.6%) are invasive species and R. everetti (32.7%) a native forest-inhabiting species. While the three invasive species were most abundant at low elevations, R. everetti was most abundant at higher elevations. The number of invasive rats has been attributed to their survival and adaptation at lower elevations, where habitat conversion and degradation are most intense, while native species are more common at higher elevations where habitat is relatively un- disturbed. Key words: elevation, forest species, invasive species, Philippines, rainforest, Rattus species. INTRODUCTION and occur at high abundances in local mammal as- semblages (Heaney et al. 1998, Steppan et al. 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Report 2018 -2019
    Shivaji University Campus Biodiversity Report 2018 -2019 Prepared by DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, SHIVAJI UNIVERSITY, KOLHAPUR ©Registrar, Shivaji University, Kolhapur (Maharashtra) All rights reserved. No part of this work be reproduced in any form by mimeograph or any other means without permission in writing from Shivaji University, Kolhapur (Maharashtra). ISBN: 978-93-85190-14-8 Published by: Prof. (Dr.) Vilas D. Nandavadekar Registrar, Shivaji University, Kolhapur. Phone: (0) 0231-2609063 (R) 0231-2609059 (M) +91-9421918134 Email: [email protected] Prof. (Dr.) R. K. Kamat Photo credits: Co-ordinator, Prof. (Dr.) P. D. Raut, Amol Chougule, Internal Quality Assurance Cell, Chetan Bhosale, Amit Mane. Shivaji University, Printed by: Kolhapur- 416 004. Shivaji University Press, (Maharashtra), India. Kolhapur-416 004. Phone: (O) 0231-2609087 Email: [email protected] Dedicated to Late Dr. (Ms.) Nilisha P. Desai Chief Editor Prof. (Dr.) Prakash D. Raut Editorial Team Dr. (Mrs.)Aasawari S. Jadhav Dr. Pallavi R. Bhosale Ms. Nirmala B. Pokharnikar Ms. Aarti A. Parit Ms. Priya R. Vasagadekar Ms. Sonal G. Chonde Ms. Sanjivani T. Chougale Mr. Amol A. Chougule Mr. Chetan S. Bhosale Field Team Ms. Nirmala Pokharnikar Ms. Aarti A. Parit Ms. Priya Vasagadekar Mr. Amol A. Chougule Ms. Sanjivani T. Chougale Mr. Amit R. Mane Mr. Chetan S. Bhosale Mr. Ajay V. Gaud Mr. Harshad V. Suryawanshi Prepared by: Department of Environmental Science, Shivaji University, Kolhapur. ISBN: 978-93-85190-14-8 EDITORIAL .... It is a proud moment for me to put forward the ‘Biodiversity Report 2018 - 2019’ of Shivaji University, Kolhapur. The richness of any area is measured by its species diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Survey of Online Trade in Live Birds and Reptiles in The
    S H O R T R E P O R T 0ൾඍඁඈൽඌ A rapid online survey was undertaken EHWZHHQDQG)HEUXDU\ GD\V DSSUR[LPDWHO\KRXUVVXUYH\GD\ RQ pre-selected Facebook groups specializing in the trade of live pets. Ten groups each for reptiles and birds were selected based on trading activities in the previous six months. The survey was carried out during ZHHN GD\V 0RQGD\ WR )ULGD\ E\ JRLQJ through each advertisement posted in A rapid survey of online trade in the groups. Information, including that live birds and reptiles in the Philippines relating to species, quantity, and asking HYDROSAURUS PUSTULATUS WWF / URS WOY WOY WWF / URS PUSTULATUS HYDROSAURUS SULFH ZDV QRWHG 6SHFLHV ZHUH LGHQWL¿HG Report by Cristine P. Canlas, Emerson Y. Sy, to the lowest taxonomic level whenever and Serene Chng possible. Taxonomy follows Gill and 'RQVNHU IRU ELUGV DQG 8HW] et al. IRUUHSWLOHV7KHDXWKRUVFDOFXODWHG ,ඇඍඋඈൽඎർඍංඈඇ WKH WRWDO SRWHQWLDO YDOXH R൵HUHG IRU ELUGV and reptiles based on prices indicated he Philippines is the second largest archipelago in the world by traders. Advertisements that did not comprising 7641 islands and is both a mega-biodiverse specify prices were assigned the lowest country for harbouring wildlife species found nowhere known price for each taxon. Valuations in else in the world, and one of eight biodiversity hotspots this report were based on a conversion rate having a disproportionate number of species threatened with RI86' 3+3 $QRQ ,WLV ,//8675$7,213+,/,33,1(6$,/),1/,=$5' TH[WLQFWLRQIXUWKHULWKDVVRPHRIWKHKLJKHVWUDWHVRIHQGHPLFLW\LQWKH not always possible during online surveys world (Myers et al 7KHLOOHJDOZLOGOLIHWUDGHLVRQHRIWKHPDLQ WRYHULI\WKDWDOOR൵HUVDUHJHQXLQH UHDVRQVEHKLQGVLJQL¿FDQWGHFOLQHVRIVRPHZLOGOLIHSRSXODWLRQVLQ$VLD LQFOXGLQJWKH3KLOLSSLQHV $QRQ6RGKLet al1LMPDQDQG 5ൾඌඎඅඍඌ 6KHSKHUG'LHVPRVet al5DRet al 7KHWildlife Act of 2001 (Republic Act No.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.7 Christmas Island Pipistrelle
    FINAL REPORT OF THE CHRISTMAS ISLAND EXPERT WORKING GROUP TO THE MINISTER FOR ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION, HERITAGE AND THE ARTS Red crabs, Christmas Island – Photo by Max Orchard Expert Working Group members Associate Professor Bob Beeton (Chair) Dr Andrew Burbidge Professor Gordon Grigg Professor Peter Harrison Dr Ric How Dr Bill Humphreys Mr Norm McKenzie Dr John Woinarski Secretariat Ms Anne-Marie Delahunt from February 2009 to October 2009 Ms Kerry Cameron from February 2009 to June 2009 Mr Harry Abrahams from October 2009 to March 2010 Ms Meryl Triggs from February 2009 to March 2010 1 April 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations...................................................................................................... 12 1.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................... 18 1.1 Initial Terms of Reference of the working group ............................................... 18 1.2 Amended Membership and Amended Terms of Reference .............................. 19 2.0 APPROACH TO ADDRESSING THE TERMS OF REFERENCE.......................... 19 2.1 Phase 1 .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Baseline Assessment in the REDD-Plus Pilot and Key Biodiversity Area in Mt
    Biodiversity baseline assessment in the REDD-Plus pilot and key biodiversity area in Mt. Nacolod, Southern Leyte Final technical report in collaboration with Imprint This publication is by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH through the Climate-relevant Modernization of the National Forest Policy and Piloting of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) Measures Project in the Philippines, funded by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) under its International Climate Initiative. The BMU supports this Initiative based on a decision of the German Parliament. For more information, see http://www.international-climate-initiative.com. As a federally owned enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for sustainable development. This study was undertaken by Fauna & Flora International commissioned by GIZ, with co-financing by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)- Global Environmental Facility (GEF)-DENR Biodiversity Management Bureau (BMB) New Conservation Areas in the Philippines Project (NewCAPP) and the Foundation for the Philippine Environment (FPE). Statements from named contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. Data and information generated from the study are within the possession of the Philippine Government through the DENR as mandated by law. Published by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Registered offices Bonn and Eschborn, Germany T +49 228 44 60-0 (Bonn) T +49 61 96 79-0 (Eschborn) Responsible For. Ricardo L. Calderon Director Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Forest Management Bureau Forest Management Bureau Building Visayas Avenue, Quezon City 1101 Philippines T: 63 2 928 9313 / 927 4788 F: 63 2 920 0374 Dr.
    [Show full text]