DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Fiji: the State of the World's Forest Genetic Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republic of Fiji: the State of the World's Forest Genetic Resources REPUBLIC OF FIJI This country report is prepared as a contribution to the FAO publication, The Report on the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources. The content and the structure are in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines given by FAO in the document Guidelines for Preparation of Country Reports for the State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources (2010). These guidelines set out recommendations for the objective, scope and structure of the country reports. Countries were requested to consider the current state of knowledge of forest genetic diversity, including: Between and within species diversity List of priority species; their roles and values and importance List of threatened/endangered species Threats, opportunities and challenges for the conservation, use and development of forest genetic resources These reports were submitted to FAO as official government documents. The report is presented on www. fao.org/documents as supportive and contextual information to be used in conjunction with other documentation on world forest genetic resources. The content and the views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the entity submitting the report to FAO. FAO may not be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this report. STATE OF THE FOREST GENETIC RESOURCES IN FIJI Department of Forests Ministry of Fisheries and Forests for The Republic of Fiji Islands and the Secreatriat of Pacific Communities (SPC) State of the Forest Genetic Resources in Fiji _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents Executve Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 5 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….. 6 Chapter 1: The Current State of the Forest Genetic Resources in Fiji ………………………………………………………………….……. 10 1.1 Priority Forest Tree Species …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 1.2 Forest Plant Species Actively Managed for Human Utilization ………………………………………………………. 10 1.3 Main Forest Trees or Other Woody Plant Species Actively Managed for Environmental Services ………………….. 11 1.4 Forest Trees and Other Woody Species which are Endemic …………………………………………………………… 11 1.5 Trees and Other Woody Forest Species Identified as Being Threatened ……………………………………………… 11 1.6 Regular Assessment of Forest Tree Threatened Species .……………………………………………………………… 11 1.7 Tree Species for which there is Insufficient Information to Determine Wheather or not they area Threatened ……. 11 1.8 System for Documenting Forest Reproductive Materials ………………………………………………………………. 12 1.9 Current State of Forest Reproductive Materials ………………………………………………………………………… 12 1.10 Current State of Genetic Characterization of the Main Forest Trees and Other Woody Plant Species ……………... 13 1.11 Information on Forest Genetic Resources as Part of National Forest Surveys ………………………………………. 13 1.12 Forest Genetic Conservation Strategies/Programmes ………………………………………………………………….. 14 Chapter 2: The State of In-situ Conservation …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 2.1 Genetic Conservation of Forest Trees and Other Woody Plant Species in Protected Areas ………………………….. 17 2.2 Populations of all Native Tree Species and Other Woody Plant Species that are Conserved In-situ ……………….. 17 2.3 Programme for In-situ Conservation of Forest Genetic Resources …………………………………………………… 17 2.4 Main Constraints in Improving Genetic Conservation Programmes ………………………………………………….. 18 2.5 Priorities for Future In-situ Conservation Actions …………………………………………………………………….. 18 2.6 Other Relevant Information on In-situ Conservation …………………………………………………………………. 19 2.7 Species that are conserved (in Farm circa situ) on Conservation of on Farms of Trees Useful in Agroforestry …… 19 Chapter 3: The State of Ex-situ Genetic Conservation ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 3.1 Uses of Target Species Included in Ex-situ Conservation Programmes/Units ……………………………………….. 20 3.2 Main Constraints in Improving Ex-situ Conservation …………………………………………………………………. 20 3.3 Priotities for Future Ex-situ Conservation Actions ……………………………………………………………………. 20 3.4 Other Relevant Information on Ex-situ Conservation ………………………………………………………………… 20 Chapter 4: The State of Use and Sustainable Management of Forest Genetic Resources …………………………………………………… 21 4.1 Annual Quantity of Seed Transferred Internationally ………………………………………………………………… 21 4.2 Species which are Presently Subject to Tree Improvement Programmes …………………………………………….. 21 4.3 Main Tree Improvement Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………….. 21 4.4 Data for each Species …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 21 4.5 Information System Established on Tree Breeding ……………………………………………………………………. 22 4.6 Species of which Quantities of Improved Seed Available on Request ………………………………………………. 22 Chapter 5: The State of National Programmes, Research Education, Training and Legislation ……………………………………………. 23 5.1 National Forest Programme on Forest Genetic Resources ……………………………………………………………. 23 5.2 Institutions Actively Engaged in Conservation and Sustainable Forest Genetic Resources …………………………... 23 5.3 National coordination Mechanism for Forest Genetic Resources …………………………………………………….. 23 5.4 Structure and Main Functions …………………………………………………………………………………………... 24 5.5 Trends in Support for Forest Genetic Resources ……………………………………………………………………… 24 5.6 Budget Allocated to Forest Genetics Resources Research ……………………………………………………………. 24 5.7 Courses and Universities and Forest Genetic Resources Explicitly Covered ………………………………………… 24 5.8 Needs and Priorities for Research, Education & Training to Support the Conservation & Sustainable Use of FGR .. 25 5.9 Legislations or Regulations that are Relevant to FGR ………………………………………………………………….. 25 5.10 Legal Framework for FGR Strategies, Plans and Strategies …………………………………………………………… 25 5.11 Needs for Developing or Strengthening FGR ………………………………………………………………………….. 25 5.12 Needs Necessary for Greater Viability for FGR ………………………………………………………………………. 26 5.13 Specific Awareness Programmes Developed for FGR………………………………………………………………… 26 5.14 Needs and Priorities for Raising Awareness of FGR Issues …………………………………………………………... 26 Chapter 6: The State of Regional and International Collaborations ………………………………………………………………………….. 27 6.1 Regional, Sub-regional FGR Issues or Thematic Networks …………………………………………………………... 27 6.2 Needs and Priorities to Develop or Strengthen International Networks for FGR ……………………………………. 27 6.3 International/Regional Programmes for FGR …………………………………………………………………………... 27 6.4 Agencies and Main Results of the Programme ………………………………………………………………………… 27 6.5 International Financial Support to FGR ………………………………………………………………………………... 27 6.6 Needs and Priorities for Future International Collaboration …………………………………………………………... 28 2 State of the Forest Genetic Resources in Fiji _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6.7 International Agreements on FGR ……………………………………………………………………………………… 29 6.8 Impact of these Agreements on FGR …………………………………………………………………………………... 29 6.9 Impact of any International Convention on FGR ……………………………………………………………………… 29 6.10 Current International Collaboration ……………………………………………………………………………………. 29 6.11 Regional, Sub-regional, Forest Genetic Resources-based or Thematic Networks for Forest Genetic Resources……….. 30 6.12 Needs and Priorities for Future International Collaboration ………………………………………………………….. 30 Chapter 7: Access to FGR and Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Use ………………………………………………………………… 31 7.1 Regulations with Respect to Access and Benefit Sharing of FGR ……………………………………………………. 31 7.2 Legislations that Limit Access and Movement of FGR ………………………………………………………………… 31 7.3 Improve Access …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 7.4 Mechanisms for Recognizing IPR Related to FGR ……………………………………………………………………. 31 7.5 Mechanisms of Sharing Benefits Arising out of the Use of FGR ……………………………………………………... 31 Chapter 8: Contribution of FGR to Food Security and Poverty Alleviation ………………………………………………………………… 32 Table 1: Forest characteristics and areas (FRA) ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Table 2: Priority forest tree species in Fiji …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 Table 3: Forest species for which genetic variability has been evaluated …………………………………………………………………… 13 Table 4: For in-situ and ex-situ gene conservation …………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 Table 5: Nature and forest reserves ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 Table 6: In-situ conservation programme ……………………………………………………………………………………………………... 17 Table 7: Target forest species included within in-situ conservation programmes/units ……………………………………………….……. 17 Table 8: Ex-situ conservation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 Table 9: Seed and vegetative propagules transferred internationally per annum (average of the last five years) …………………….…… 21 Table 10: Forest tree improvement programme ………………………………………………………………………………………….……. 21 Table 11: Tree improvement trials ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 21 Table 12: Seed orchards ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 22 Table 13: Type of reproductive material available ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 Table 14: Needs for developing FGR legislation …………………………………………………………………………………..….……… 25 Table 15: Awareness raising needs ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……. 26 Table 16: Needs for internation collaboration and networking ………………………………………………………………………….……
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Ala'alahua, Mahoe
    Plants ʹAlaʹalahua, mahoe Alectryon macrococcus var. auwahiensis SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered Genetic Safety Net Species IUCN Red List Ranking ‐ CR B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking ‐ Critically Imperiled (G1T1) Endemism ‐ Maui Kim and Forest Starr, USGS Critical Habitat ‐ Designated SPECIES INFORMATION: Alectryon macrococcus of the soapberry family (Sapindaceae) is a tree up to 36 ft (11 m) tall with reddish brown branches. The leaves are usually 8 to 22 in (20 to 55 cm) long, typically with two to five pairs of egg‐shaped, slightly asymmetrical leaflets. Glossy and smooth above, the leaves have a conspicuous netted pattern of veins. A dense covering of rust‐colored hairs persists on the lower surfaces of mature leaves of A. macrococcus var. auwahiensis, whereas the mature leaves of A. macrococcus var. macrococcus lack hairs or are only slightly hairy. In both varieties, the flowers, which may be either bisexual or male, are borne in branched clusters up to l2 in (30 cm) long and lack petals. The fruit of this tree provided food for the early Hawaiians, as both the seed and the scarlet‐colored, fleshy aril around it have mild but slightly sweet flavors. The two varieties recognized for this species are Federally Listed as Endangered. The first, variety macrococcus, is found on four Hawaiian islands. The second, discussed here, is variety auwahiensis, found only on the island of Maui, and is much rarer. DISTRIBUTION: A. macrococcus var. auwahiensis is found only on the island of Maui, on the south slope of the volcano Haleakalā, at elevations of 1,017 and 3,562 m (1,168 and 3,337 ft).
    [Show full text]
  • Promecothecini Chapuis 1875 Promecothecites Chapuis 1875:300
    Tribe Promecothecini Chapuis 1875 Promecothecites Chapuis 1875:300. Handlirsch 1925:666 (classification); Gressitt 1950:81 (China species). Promecothecini Chapuis. Würmli 1975a:45 (genera); Bouchard et al. 2011:78, 518 (nomenclature); Liao et al. 2015:162 (host plants). Promecothecini Weise 1911a:78. Weise 1911b:81 (redescription); Zacher 1913:103 (key); Handlirsch 1925:666 (classification); Uhmann 1931i:848 (museum list), 1940g:121 (claws), 1951a:31 (museum list), 1958e:222 (catalog), 1959d:8 (scutellum), 1964a:458 (catalog), 1964(1965):241 (faunal list), 1966d:275 (note); Bryant 1936:256 (faunal list); Liu 1936:249 (China species); Wu 1937:912 (faunal list); Gressitt 1939c:133 (distribution), 1957b:279 (South Pacific species), 1970:71 (Fiji species); Gressitt & Kimoto 1963a:905 (China species); Seeno & Wilcox 1982:164 (catalog); Jolivet 1988b:13 (host plants), 1989b:310 (host plants); Jolivet & Hawkeswood 1995:154 (host plants); Cox 1996a:172 (pupae); Mohamedsaid 2004:169 (Malaysian species); Staines 2004a:317 (host plants); Chaboo 2007:183 (phylogeny). Type genus:Promecotheca Blanchard. Promecispa Weise 1909 Promecispa Weise 1909:112. Type species:Promecispa voeltzkowi Weise 1909 by monotypy. Weise 1910d:442, 501 (faunal list), 1911a:53 (catalog), 1911b:80 (redescription); Uhmann 1931i:848 (museum list), 1958e:223 (catalog); Würmli 1975a:46 (genera); Seeno & Wilcox 1982:164 (catalog). Promecispa voeltzkowi Weise 1909 Promecispa voeltzkowi Weise 1909:112 (type:Madagascar, Kinkuni, ZMHB). Weise 1910d:442, 501 (faunal list), 1911a:53 (catalog), 1911b:80 (catalog); Uhmann 1931i:848 (type), 1958e:223 (catalog). Distribution. Madagascar. Food plant. Unknown. Promecotheca Blanchard 1853 Promecotheca Dejean 1837:387 Nomen Nudum. Guérin-Méneville 1840b:334 (note). Promecotheca Blanchard 1853:312. Type species:Hispa cyanipes Erichson 1834, designated by Baly 1858.
    [Show full text]
  • Kilaka Forest
    Kilaka Forest Conservation Area Management Plan Copyright: © 2016 Wildlife Conservation Society Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided that the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited withoutprior written consent of the copyright owner. Citation: WCS (2016) Kilaka Forest Conservation Area Management Plan. Wildlife Conservation Society, Suva, Fiji. 34 pp. Photograph (front cover): ©Ruci Lumelume/WCS Graphic design & Layout: cChange NOTE: This management plan may be amended from time to time. To obtain a copy of the current management plan, please contact: Wildlife Conservation Society Fiji Country Program 11 Ma’afu Street Suva Republic of Fiji Islands Telephone: +679 331 5174 Email: [email protected] Kilaka Forest Conservation Area Management Committee Kilaka Village Kubulau District Bua Province Republic of Fiji Kubulau Resource Management Committee Kubulau District Bua Province Republic of Fiji ENDORSEMENT On this day, 24 November, 2016 at Kilaka Village in the district of Kubulau, Bua Province, Vanua Levu in the Republic of Fiji Islands, we the undersigned endorse this management plan and its implementation. We urge the people of all communities in Kubulau and key stakeholders from government, private and non-government sectors to observe the plan and make every effort to ensure effective implementation. Minister, Ministry of Forests Tui
    [Show full text]
  • We Are Kai Tonga”
    5. “We are Kai Tonga” The islands of Moala, Totoya and Matuku, collectively known as the Yasayasa Moala, lie between 100 and 130 kilometres south-east of Viti Levu and approximately the same distance south-west of Lakeba. While, during the nineteenth century, the three islands owed some allegiance to Bau, there existed also several family connections with Lakeba. The most prominent of the few practising Christians there was Donumailulu, or Donu who, after lotuing while living on Lakeba, brought the faith to Moala when he returned there in 1852.1 Because of his conversion, Donu was soon forced to leave the island’s principal village, Navucunimasi, now known as Naroi. He took refuge in the village of Vunuku where, with the aid of a Tongan teacher, he introduced Christianity.2 Donu’s home island and its two nearest neighbours were to be the scene of Ma`afu’s first military adventures, ostensibly undertaken in the cause of the lotu. Richard Lyth, still working on Lakeba, paid a pastoral visit to the Yasayasa Moala in October 1852. Despite the precarious state of Christianity on Moala itself, Lyth departed in optimistic mood, largely because of his confidence in Donu, “a very steady consistent man”.3 He observed that two young Moalan chiefs “who really ruled the land, remained determined haters of the truth”.4 On Matuku, which he also visited, all villages had accepted the lotu except the principal one, Dawaleka, to which Tui Nayau was vasu.5 The missionary’s qualified optimism was shattered in November when news reached Lakeba of an attack on Vunuku by the two chiefs opposed to the lotu.
    [Show full text]
  • Reef Check Description of the 2000 Mass Coral Beaching Event in Fiji with Reference to the South Pacific
    REEF CHECK DESCRIPTION OF THE 2000 MASS CORAL BEACHING EVENT IN FIJI WITH REFERENCE TO THE SOUTH PACIFIC Edward R. Lovell Biological Consultants, Fiji March, 2000 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................4 2.0 Methods.........................................................................................................................................4 3.0 The Bleaching Event .....................................................................................................................5 3.1 Background ................................................................................................................................5 3.2 South Pacific Context................................................................................................................6 3.2.1 Degree Heating Weeks.......................................................................................................6 3.3 Assessment ..............................................................................................................................11 3.4 Aerial flight .............................................................................................................................11 4.0 Survey Sites.................................................................................................................................13 4.1 Northern Vanua Levu Survey..................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Agathis Macrophylla Araucariaceae (Lindley) Masters
    Agathis macrophylla (Lindley) Masters Araucariaceae LOCAL NAMES English (pacific kauri); Fijian (da‘ua,dakua dina,makadri,makadre,takua makadre,dakua,dakua makadre) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Agathis macrophylla is a tall tree typically to about 30–40 m tall, 3 m in bole diameter, with a broad canopy of up to 36 m diameter. Branches may be erect to horizontal and massive. Mature specimens have wide, spreading root systems whereas seedlings and young specimens have a vigorous taproot with one or more whorls of lateral roots. Leaves simple, entire, elliptic to lanceolate, leathery, and dark green, and shiny above and often glaucous below; about 7–15 cm long and 2–3.5 cm wide, with many close inconspicuous parallel veins. The leaves taper to a more or less pointed tip, rounded at the base, with the margins curved down at the edge. Petioles short, from almost sessile up to 5 mm long. Cones egg-shaped at the end of the first year, about 5 cm long, and 3 cm in diameter, more or less round at the end of the second year, 8–10 cm in diameter. Female cones much larger than males, globular, on thick woody stalks, green, slightly glaucous, turning brownish during ripening. Seeds brown, small, ovoid to globose, flattened, winged, and attached to a triangular cone scale about 2.5 cm across. BIOLOGY Pacific kauri is monoecious and produces cones instead of flowers. The first female cones begin to be produced at about 10 years old and take up to 2 years to mature (more often in 12-15 months).
    [Show full text]
  • Apbvariation in the Functional Properties of Barringtonia Asiatica Extract on Selected Pathogens
    Journal of Pharmacology & Clinical Research ISSN: 2473-5574 Research Article J of Pharmacol & Clin Res Volume 6 Issue 3 - September 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Isaac John Umaru DOI: 10.19080/JPCR.2018.06.555686 APBVariation in the Functional Properties of Barringtonia Asiatica Extract on Selected Pathogens Isaac John Umaru1,2*, Fasihuddin ABadruddin1, Hauwa AUmaru3, Ezeonu Chukwuma Stephen2 and Ojochenemi Yakubu 1Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, University of Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Kota-Samarahan, Malaysia 2Department of Biochemistry, Federal University Wukari Taraba State, Nigeria 3Department of biochemistry, ModiboAdama University of Technology Yola Adamawa state, Nigeria Submission: August 24, 2018; Published: September 10, 2018 *Corresponding author: Isaac John Umaru,Faculty of Resource Science and Technology, University of Malaysia Sarawak, Kuching, Kota-Samarahan Malaysia,Department of Biochemistry Federal university Wukari Taraba State, Email: Abstract Objective: on selected pathogens. The aim of this study is to look at the influence of different concentration from different solvent extract of Barringtonia asiatica Material and Methods: Barringtonia asiatica extracts were evaluated for their functional potential antimicrobial properties. The leaves of Antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, salmonella typhi, staphylococcus aureus and Klebsielia pneumonia, were determined by a disc the plant were extracted with n-hexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, chloroform and methanol and then vaporized
    [Show full text]
  • RR 556-2019.Pdf
    KFRI Research Report No. 556 ISSN: 0970-8103 ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION GENETICS OF ATUNA INDICA AND HYDNOCARPUS LONGIPEDUNCULATUS - TWO RARE AND ENDEMIC TREES IN THE KERALA PART OF THE WESTERN GHATS P. A. Jose Suma Arundev KSCSTE- Kerala Forest Research Institute Peechi-680 653, Kerala, India (An Institution under Kerala State Council for Science, Technology& Environment) March 2019 PROJECT PARTICULARS 1. Title of the project : Ecology and conservation genetics of Atuna indica and Hydnocarpus longipedunculatus - two rare and endemic trees in the Kerala part of Western Ghats 2. Department/Organization : Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi. implementing the project 3. Special Area of study : i. Population survey and Mapping ii. Population structure iii. Population dynamics (Vegetative and Reproductive dynamics) iv. Climatic and edaphic factors analysis in situ v. Population genetics (Through DNA markers) vi. Assessment of species rarity and recommendation on management strategies 4. 1. Name of the principal : Dr. P.A. Jose Investigator Principal Scientist, Tree Physiology Department Sustainable Forest Management Division 2. Name of Associate Investigator : Dr. Suma Arundev Senior Scientist, Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding Department, Forest Genetics and Biotechnology Division. 3. Name of Research : 1. Mr. Jithin, K.V., Project Fellow Personnel’s (18-08 -2015 to 18.08.2016) 2. Mr. Subin, K. Project Fellow (28-08-2016 to 15.08.2018) 3. Mr. Subin, K., Project Assistant ( 22-07-2015 to 26-09-2017) 4. Mr.Vivek, A.S., Project Assistant (24-10-2016 to 03-11-2017) 5. Mr. Binoy, N.M., Project Assistant (07-12-2017 to 13-03-2018) 5 . Name of the Funding : Plan Grant of Kerala Forest Agency Research institute, Peechi, Thrissur 6 .
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Endangered and Protected Species
    STANDING COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES REPORT ON THE ENDANGERED AND PROTECTED SPECIES (AMENDMENT) BILL (BILL NO. 6 OF 2016) PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF FIJI Parliamentary Paper No. 60 of 2016 Contents 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..3 2.0 Committee Remit and Member …………………………………………………….4 3.0 Analysis of the evidence received………………………………………………….5 4.0 Committee Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………….5 5.0 Gender analysis…………………………………………………………………………….5-6 6.0 Committee Observation……………………………………………………………………………………………………...6 7.0 Amendments to the Bill……………………………………………………………...7-23 Amendment 1 ............................................................................................ 7 Annexe A – Glossary of terms used......................................................... 25 Annexe B – Oral evidence received .......................................................... 26 Annexe C – Written evidence received ................................................... 27 NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE Page 2 | 27 Introduction The Natural Resources Committee was referred the Endangered and Protected Species (Amendment) Bill 2016 for second reading on 27thApril, 2016. The Committee has responsibility for examining the Bill and agreeing any appropriate amendments. The Endangered and Protected Species (Amendment) Bill 2016 amends the Endangered and Protected Species Act 2002 by adding more species for protection. The 2002 Act regulates the international trade, domestic trade, possession and transportation of species protected under the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species and Wild Fauna and Flora (‘CITES’). To support the Committee in this process, it issued a call for written submissions on 7th May, 2016 and received two responses from a range of stakeholders. It held oral evidence sessions on 06th May, 2016 and 16th May, 2016 and heard from Department of Environment and the SODELPA Opposition Party Office. The Committee would like to extend its thanks to all those who participated and provided an essential contribution to this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecythidaceae (G.T
    Flora Malesiana, Series I, Volume 21 (2013) 1–118 LECYTHIDACEAE (G.T. Prance, Kew & E.K. Kartawinata, Bogor)1 Lecythidaceae A.Rich. in Bory, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat. 9 (1825) 259 (‘Lécythidées’), nom. cons.; Poit., Mém. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 13 (1835) 141; Miers, Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. 30, 2 (1874) 157; Nied. in Engl. & Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam. 3, 7 (1892) 30; R.Knuth in Engl., Pflanzenr. IV.219, Heft 105 (1939) 26; Whitmore, Tree Fl. Malaya 2 (1973) 257; R.J.F.Hend., Fl. Australia 8 (1982) 1; Corner, Wayside Trees Malaya ed. 3, 1 (1988) 349; S.A.Mori & Prance, Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 21, 2 (1990) 1; Chantar., Kew Bull. 50 (1995) 677; Pinard, Tree Fl. Sabah & Sarawak 4 (2002) 101; H.N.Qin & Prance, Fl. China 13 (2007) 293; Prance in Kiew et al., Fl. Penins. Malaysia, Ser. 2, 3 (2012) 175. — Myrtaceae tribus Lecythideae (A.Rich.) A.Rich. ex DC., Prodr. 3 (1828) 288. — Myrtaceae subtribus Eulecythideae Benth. & Hook.f., Gen. Pl. 1, 2 (1865) 695, nom. inval. — Type: Lecythis Loefl. Napoleaeonaceae A.Rich. in Bory, Dict. Class. Hist. Nat. 11 (1827) 432. — Lecythi- daceae subfam. Napoleonoideae Nied. in Engl. & Prantl., Nat. Pflanzenfam. 3, 7 (1893) 33. — Type: Napoleonaea P.Beauv. Scytopetalaceae Engl. in Engl. & Prantl, Nat. Pflanzenfam., Nachtr. 1 (1897) 242. — Lecythidaceae subfam. Scytopetaloideae (Engl.) O.Appel, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121 (1996) 225. — Type: Scytopetalum Pierre ex Engl. Lecythidaceae subfam. Foetidioideae Nied. in Engl. & Prantl, Nat Pflanzenfam. 3, 7 (1892) 29. — Foetidiaceae (Nied.) Airy Shaw in Willis & Airy Shaw, Dict. Fl. Pl., ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Governance Innovation Networks for Sustainable Tuna Governance Innovation
    Tuna Sustainable for Networks Innovation Governance Governance Innovation Networks for Sustainable Tuna Alice M.M. Miller 2014 Alice M.M. Miller Governance Innovation Networks for Sustainable Tuna Alice M.M. Miller Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol Professor of Environmental Policy Wageningen University Co-promotor Dr S.R. Bush Associate professor, Environmental Policy Group Wageningen University Other members Dr L. Campling, Queen Mary’s of University, London, UK Dr P.J. Jones, University College London, UK Prof. Dr A.D. Rijnsdorp, Wageningen University Prof. Dr C.J.A.M. Termeer, Wageningen University This research was conducted under the auspices of the Wageningen School of Social Sciences Governance Innovation Networks for Sustainable Tuna Alice M.M. Miller Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by authority of the Rector Macnificus Prof. Dr M.J. Kropff, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Thursday 2 October 2014 at 11 a.m. in the Aula. Alice M.M. Miller Governance Innovation Networks for Sustainable Tuna, 194 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2014) With references, with summaries in Dutch and English ISBN 978-94-6257-025-2 Acknowledgements The foundation of this thesis is networks. Through over four years of research in two different universities, I developed my understanding of networks in the context of tuna governance but also on a personal level. It is through my network of colleagues, friends and family that I have been able to work on and finish this thesis and even to enjoy the process (mostly!) I would therefore like to take this opportunity to thank all those people who have offered help and support to me over the years in their own individual ways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study in Ecological Economics
    The Process of Forest Conservation in Vanuatu: A Study in Ecological Economics Luca Tacconi December 1995 A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of New South Wales I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my . knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to a substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of a university or other institute of higher ·learning, except where due acknowledgment is made in the text of the thesis. Luca Tacconi School of Economics and Management University College The University of New South Wales 22 December 1995 With love to my parents Alfi.o and Leda (Con affetto dedico questa tesi ai miei genitori Alfio e Leda) IV Abstract The objective of this thesis is to develop an ecological economic framework for the assessment and establishment of protected areas (PAs) that are aimed at conserving forests and biodiversity. The framework is intended to be both rigorous and relevant to the decision-making process. Constructivism is adopted as the paradigm guiding the research process of the thesis, after firstly examining also positivist philosophy and 'post-normal' scientific methodology. The tenets of both ecological and environmental economics are then discussed. An expanded model of human behaviour, which includes facets derived from institutional economics and socioeconomics as well as aspects of neoclassical economics, is outlined. The framework is further developed by considering, from a contractarian view point, the implications of intergenerational equity for biodiversity conservation policies.
    [Show full text]