DOCSLIB.ORG

FY 2019 Budget Justification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FY 2019 Budget Justification United States Department of Agriculture FY 2019 Budget Justification Forest Service February 2018 1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. i FY 2019 Budget Justification Table of Contents Budget Overview ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Legislative Proposals .......................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Provisions .................................................................................................................. 4 General Provisions ............................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose Statement .............................................................................................................................. 9 Four-Year Summary of Appropriations ............................................................................................. 10 Four-Year Summary of Full Time Equivalents .................................................................................. 13 Revenue, Receipts and Transfers ....................................................................................................... 15 Organization Chart ............................................................................................................................. 16 Available Funds and Staff Years (SYs) .............................................................................................. 17 Motor Vehicle Fleet Data ................................................................................................................... 18 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Years .................................................................................. 20 Shared Funding Projects ..................................................................................................................... 21 Summary of Performance ................................................................................................................... 23 Forest and Rangeland Research ................................................................................................................................... 27 Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes ..................................................................... 27 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ............................................................................................................... 27 Project Statements .............................................................................................................................. 28 Justifications ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Classification by Objects .................................................................................................................... 34 Status of Programs ............................................................................................................................. 35 Primary Authorities ............................................................................................................................ 37 State and Private Forestry ............................................................................................................................................ 41 Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes ..................................................................... 41 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ............................................................................................................... 41 Project Statements .............................................................................................................................. 42 Justifications ....................................................................................................................................... 44 Classification by Objects .................................................................................................................... 50 Status of Programs ............................................................................................................................. 51 Primary Authorities ............................................................................................................................ 59 National Forest System ................................................................................................................................................ 61 Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes ..................................................................... 61 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ............................................................................................................... 61 Project Statements .............................................................................................................................. 62 Justifications ....................................................................................................................................... 64 Classification by Objects .................................................................................................................... 72 Status of Programs ............................................................................................................................. 73 Primary Authorities ............................................................................................................................ 83 ii Capital Improvement and Maintenance ....................................................................................................................... 89 Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes ..................................................................... 89 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ............................................................................................................... 89 Project Statements .............................................................................................................................. 90 Justifications ....................................................................................................................................... 92 Classification by Objects .................................................................................................................... 95 Status of Programs ............................................................................................................................. 96 Primary Authorities ............................................................................................................................ 99 Land Acquisition ....................................................................................................................................................... 101 Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes ..................................................................... 101 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ............................................................................................................... 101 Project Statements .............................................................................................................................. 102 Justifications ....................................................................................................................................... 104 Classification by Objects .................................................................................................................... 106 Status of Programs ............................................................................................................................. 107 Primary Authorities ............................................................................................................................ 108 Other Appropriations ................................................................................................................................................. 109 Appropriations Language and Explanation of Changes ..................................................................... 109 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ............................................................................................................... 109 Project Statements .............................................................................................................................. 110 Justifications ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directive MRP 4501.1 12/4/07
    United States Department of Agriculture Marketing and Regulatory Programs Agricultural Marketing Service Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration Directive MRP 4501.1 12/4/07 ELECTRONIC STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND LEAVE (SEL) 1. PURPOSE This Directive establishes Marketing and Regulatory Programs (MRP) policy on electronic statement of earnings and leave (SEL). 2. AUTHORITIES a. USDA Memorandum, Electronic Statement of Earnings and Leave Memo, dated February 20, 2007. b. National Finance Center (NFC) Bulletin 07-8, Electronic Statement of Earnings and leave and Print Waiver Submission Instructions, dated April 11, 2007. c. USDA Memorandum, “Paperless” Statements of Earnings and Leave, dated April 19, 2007. 3. BACKGROUND By memorandum dated February 20, 2007, the USDA decided to eliminate the printed and mailed SEL to reduce payroll expenses. The SEL is available to all employees via the Employee Personal Page (EPP) on NFC’s website. Members of the Senior Executive Service stopped receiving mailed SELs beginning pay period 8 (April 15, 2007). The remainder of employees will receive advance notice of the actual implementation date in the mailed SEL. 4. POLICY It is MRP policy that: a. SELs will be accessed electronically by employees using the EPP. b. Employees who do not have regular access to a computer with internet capability at their worksite may request a waiver using MRP Form 350, Statement of Earnings and Leave (SEL) Waiver Request Form (or Cancellation), see Attachment 1. Distribution: AMS, APHIS, GIPSA Originating Office: MRPHR-ECCPB c. Waivers must be submitted and approved at least a full pay period before the pay period to be implemented to allow time for processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Agricultural Service
    FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PURPOSE STATEMENT The Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) is unique within the U.S. Government for its sole focus on global agricultural trade and food security issues. This recognized expertise is trusted by the broader U.S. agricultural community, from farmers and ranchers to food processors, other U.S. government agencies, and non-governmental organizations to provide sound, reliable and consistent intelligence on foreign agricultural markets, crop conditions and agro-political dynamics. The agency’s on the ground global network of agricultural attachés and locally employed staff provide an unparalleled resource for understanding trade policy and market development issues as they arise. Through this talented and highly skilled staff FAS has built long-term, agriculture-specific relationships with foreign stakeholders that are invaluable to building institutional knowledge of host countries’ agricultural sectors. This knowledge is put to work on maintaining a level playing field for U.S. food and agricultural exports abroad and expanding new opportunities in countries with market potential. FAS links U.S. agriculture to the world to enhance export opportunities and global food security. FAS facilitates international trade and trade cooperation, which are critical to the economic vitality of the U.S. agricultural sector and the Administration’s top economic priority: job creation. Increased economic activity in food and agricultural- related sectors of the economy help rural communities build and maintain prosperity. Nowhere is this more evident than in agricultural trade. In fact, our strategic goal is to generate an additional $89 billion worth of U.S. economic activity by expanding export opportunities for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020Usdaexplanatory Notes –Agricultural Marketing Service
    2020 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE Agency-Wide ................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Purpose Statement.....................................................................................................................................................3 Available Funds and Staff Years ............................................................................................................................ 11 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Years ...................................................................................................... 13 Vehicle Fleet ........................................................................................................................................................... 14 Shared Funding Projects ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Account 1: Marketing Services ................................................................................................................................... 17 Appropriations Language........................................................................................................................................ 17 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ................................................................................................................................... 17 Project Statement
    [Show full text]
  • La Familia Drug Cartel: Implications for U.S-Mexican Security
    Visit our website for other free publication downloads http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ To rate this publication click here. STRATEGIC STUDIES INSTITUTE The Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) is part of the U.S. Army War College and is the strategic-level study agent for issues related to national security and military strategy with emphasis on geostrate- gic analysis. The mission of SSI is to use independent analysis to conduct strategic studies that develop policy recommendations on: • Strategy, planning, and policy for joint and combined employment of military forces; • Regional strategic appraisals; • The nature of land warfare; • Matters affecting the Army’s future; • The concepts, philosophy, and theory of strategy; and • Other issues of importance to the leadership of the Army. Studies produced by civilian and military analysts concern topics having strategic implications for the Army, the Department of De- fense, and the larger national security community. In addition to its studies, SSI publishes special reports on topics of special or immediate interest. These include edited proceedings of conferences and topically-oriented roundtables, expanded trip re- ports, and quick-reaction responses to senior Army leaders. The Institute provides a valuable analytical capability within the Army to address strategic and other issues in support of Army par- ticipation in national security policy formulation. LA FAMILIA DRUG CARTEL: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S-MEXICAN SECURITY George W. Grayson December 2010 The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Acronyms and Abbreviations
    USDA Forest Service Office of Communication Washington, D.C. Acronyms and Abbreviations Updated: November 29, 2005 Office of Communication Washington Office Acronyms & Abbreviations Definitions Abbreviation: A shortened form of a word, term or phrase used chiefly in writing to represent the full form (for example: 0C for degree centigrade, N for nitrogen, ha for hectare, etc.) Acronym: More commonly used in writing and conversation, an acronym is formed by taking the initial letters of a name, term, or title (such as WO for Washington Office, NFS for National Forest Systems, R&D for Research and Development, S&PF for State and Private Forestry, and so on); or by combining initial letters or parts of a name or title (such as “COLA” for cost of living adjustment, “AGRICOLA” for Agriculture Online Access, “asap” for as soon as possible, etc.) to shorten long titles and make them easier to remember. Some acronyms may have more than one meaning and are so noted in the list. his is an alphabetical listing of acronyms and abbreviations you may encounter in Forest Service documents and publications or websites, or those materials (e.g., T correspondence) that may have impact on your work or situation, whether you’re a scientist, wildlife biologist, administrative assistant, etc. When available, matter in parentheses indicates the deputy area, staff, program, computer system, or office, and other pertinent information. For a complete list of acronyms used across all agencies in the US Government, please go to http://www.firstgov.gov/Topics/Reference_Shelf.shtml (click on Abbreviations and Acronyms). You are welcome to participate in constructing and improving this list.
    [Show full text]
  • El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Oral History Project Abstracts 1 OH 3541 Narrator
    El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Oral History Project Abstracts OH 3541 Narrator: Nelson, Clarence (b. 1923) Interviewer: Robert Miller Title: “An Oral History with Clarence Nelson” Date: April 27, 2007 Language: English Location: Oceanside, California Project: El Toro Marine Corps Air Station Status: completed; 28 pages This oral history spans 1923-2007. Bulk dates: 1940s-1950s. An oral history with Clarence Nelson, resident of Oceanside, California, retired member of the United States Marine Corps (USMC), and husband of former member of the USMC Women’s Reserve, Vera Nelson (OH 3547). This interview was conducted as part of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Oral History Project for California State University, Fullerton and the Center for Oral and Public History. The purpose of this interview was to gather information regarding Nelson’s experiences at and around El Toro. This interview includes discussion about growing up on a farm in Idaho during the Depression; discusses different jobs he held before World War II, including a position with the Civilian Conservation Corps; discusses Pearl Harbor and his decision to join the USMC; describes training in San Diego and his eventual assignment to special services; details his work developing recreational activities; recalls deployment to Guadalcanal; remembers being hospitalized for malaria; discusses housing and transportation difficulties at El Toro MCAS; reflects on the Japanese American internment and the fear of Japanese bombing at San Diego; discusses the debate to terminate the USMC; details the changing of the ranking designations in the USMC during the 1950s, and his reinstatement for the Korean War; describes the restoration of the Lighter-than-Air (LTA) base for helicopter storage; recounts his son’s contraction of the polio and involvement in a March of Dimes fundraiser during a 1953 Polio epidemic; comments on El Toro’s closure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mara Salvatrucha and Regional Insecurity
    The Mara Salvatrucha and Regional Insecurity How MS-13 perpetuates a cycle of Migration and Violence between the United States and Central America Joseph Sanchez National Security Studies Institute University of Texas at El Paso December 6th, 2015 The Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13) is a transnational gang that has spread from the United States to El Salvador and other Central American countries. The gang is unique, as it possesses characteristics of both a street and a transnational criminal organization. Due to its brutality and expansion, MS-13 has created an environment of public insecurity within Central America. This in turn has spurred several initiatives with the United States and its partners in an attempt to control a cycle of violence and migration between the countries. Introduction Within the last decade, the United States has seen a recent influx of immigrants from Central America due to an increase of violence in El Salvador and neighboring Central American countries. Consequently, immigration has once again become a much discussed political issue in the 2016 elections and remains at the forefront of political agendas.1 The latest wave of migration has been attributed to the Mara Salvatrucha, one of the largest street gangs in the United States and Central America. Due to the extreme brutality, the Mara Salvatrucha numbers have grown considerably, making it a transnational and regional threat. 2 However, this is not the first time Central American immigrants have fled their country due to violence. This has happened before, during the 1980’s with a violent and bloody civil war in El Salvador.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERT REPORT of DR. EVERARD MEADE July 12, 2016 1. Counsel
    EXPERT REPORT OF DR. EVERARD MEADE July 12, 2016 1. Counsel for has asked me to offer expert testimony to assist the Court in evaluating his claim for asylum. I respectfully submit this report, and any corresponding testimony at the hearing, in order to: (1) provide background regarding the events in question and the areas of Mexico in which they occurred; (2) explain the country conditions in Mexico, both in the present and in the period extending back to 2006; (3) offer my opinion on the consistency of the declaration of Mr. with the conditions in Mexico at the relevant times and in the relevant places; and (4) discuss the likelihood that Mr. would be harmed if returned to Mexico. 2. As the Director of the Trans-Border Institute at the University of San Diego, I monitor the conditions in Mexico on a continual basis. As a historian of Mexico and Central America focused on the relationships between violence, memory, and the law, I have tracked patterns of violence and their relationship to the criminal justice system since at least 1998. See attached (curriculum vitae). I have testified before Immigration Courts across the country in conjunction with removal proceedings and asylum applications. 3. Before preparing this report, I reviewed and consulted a number of academic, journalistic, and government sources (from Mexico and the United States), many of which are cited herein. As discussed herein, I conducted certain independent research using resources that I customarily consult when researching country conditions in Mexico and the impact of the latest developments in drug trafficking, organized crime, and law enforcement operations on basic human rights conditions, in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Agency Financial Report
    2020 AGENCY FINANCIAL REPORT United States Department of Agriculture Page Intentionally Blank USDA’s Non-Discrimination Statement In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, USDA, its Mission Areas, agencies, staff offices, employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Program information may be made available in languages other than English. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication to obtain program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or American Sign Language) should contact the responsible Mission Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, a complainant should complete a Form AD 3027, USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, which can be obtained online, from any USDA office, by calling (866) 632-9992, or by writing a letter addressed to USDA. The letter must contain the complainant’s name, address, telephone number, and a written description of the alleged discriminatory action in sufficient detail to inform the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature and date of an alleged civil rights violation.
    [Show full text]
  • New Employee Resource Guide
    New Employee Resource Guide Welcome to APHIS! Congratulations on becoming a member of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). APHIS employees work in all 50 states, several territories, and 25 countries worldwide. We are on the job 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, protecting America’s agricultural and natural resources. There are two core beliefs that guide APHIS’ work every day; the first is that healthy and profitable agriculture is good for America because it means feeding and clothing the world. The second is that the Government’s role is to do collectively what none of us can do for ourselves. APHIS’ employees are dedicated, compassionate, and highly motivated individuals who work hard to improve the lives of Americans on a daily basis. And now you are a part of that mission. We keep animals and plants healthy—allowing people to enjoy a safe and abundant food supply and protecting the livelihood of our farmers and ranchers. We negotiate trade deals to help agricultural products get to the global marketplace. And we work on the cutting edge of biotechnology and protect the welfare of animals. This work could not be accomplished without the help of our support units. They help APHIS and its programs accomplish mission critical work by using their expertise in analysis, finance, communications, planning, training, recruitment and talent management, civil rights, and health and safety. The support units make the most of APHIS’ resources and create a unified Agency identity. Much of the work in APHIS is constant, like issuing permits or inspecting licensed facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Calderón's Caldron
    Calderón’s Caldron Lessons from Mexico’s Battle Against Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking in Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, and Michoacán Vanda Felbab-Brown The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW SEPTEMBER 2011 Washington, D.C. 20036 brookings.edu Calderón’s Caldron Lessons from Mexico’s Battle Against Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking in Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, and Michoacán Vanda Felbab-Brown Acknowledgements wish to thank Mauricio Cardenas, Michael O’Hanlon, Theodore Piccone, and Seyom Brown for their I invaluable comments on the paper. Erasmo Sanchez and Gustavo Rivera provided excellent re- search assistance. My deep thanks also go to the many people I interviewed during the fieldwork in Mexico or consulted with beforehand and afterward. They all provided unique and important per- spectives and insights. These include officials of the U.S. and Mexican governments, members of the Mexican military and police forces, U.S. and Mexican academics, policy experts, and NGO representa- tives, members of the U.S.-Mexico business community, Mexican journalists, and foreign correspon- dents in Mexico. And I am also deeply grateful to the many other Mexican citizens who despite secu- rity risks to themselves and their families were willing to speak with me. For security reasons, many of my interlocutors must remain anonymous. The fieldwork and research were generously supposed by a grant from the Open Society Foundations. Calderón’s Caldron Lessons from Mexico’s Battle Against Organized Crime and Drug Trafficking in Tijuana, Ciudad Juárez, and Michoacán ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements.......................................................................ii Preface . iv The Tijuana Law Enforcement Model and Its Limitations . 1 Ciudad Juárez and the Evolution of Mexico’s Security Policy..................................8 Socioeconomic Policies for Combating Organized Crime: The Case of Ciudad Juárez .
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Jamie L
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Jamie L. Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., 20250 phone (202) 720–3631, http://www.usda.gov TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture; education: B.A., Hamilton College; J.D., Albany Law School; professional: Governor, Iowa, 1999–2007; nominated by President Barack Obama to become the 30th Secretary of Agriculture, and was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 20, 2009. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Secretary of Agriculture.—Tom Vilsack, room 200–A (202) 720–3631. Deputy Secretary.—Michael Scuse (acting). Chief of Staff.—Krysta Harden. Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations.—Oscar Gonzales. Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy.—Anne MacMillan. OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 240–W, phone (202) 720–3291 Assistant Secretary.—Dr. Gregory Parham, 720–3291. Deputy Assistant Secretary.—Malcom A. Shorter, 720–3291. Chief of Staff.—Jennifer Yezak, 260–8497. Special Assistant.—Janice Williams, 720–3291. Senior Advisors: Max Finberg, 720–1271; Elizabeth Reiter, 720–3874. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES South Agriculture Building, Room 1049–S, phone (202) 720–6383 Chief Administrative Law Judge.—Vacant. Executive Assistant to the Chief Administrative Law Judge.—Diane Green. Administrative Law Judges: Janice K. Bullard, Jill S. Clifton, 720–8161. Hearing Clerk.—Vacant, 720–4443. OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT Jamie L. Whitten Building, Room 318–W, phone (202) 720–3585 Director and Chief Human Capital Officer.—William P. Milton, Jr. Executive Assistant.—Melanie Clemons. Deputy Director.—Bobbi Jeanquart. Chief of Staff.—Lynne Short, 690–3973. Directors: Employee and Labor Relations Division.—Bryan Knowles, 720–6784. HR Enterprise Systems Management Division.—Indu Garg, 720–4963.
    [Show full text]