MAC4 Final Submitted Abstracts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

MAC4 Final Submitted Abstracts Author Institution Abstract's title ABSTRACT The idea of animal rights has gained momentum over the past decades. It typically entails the notion of fundamental rights that is universal moral rights that (some) animals have simply in virtue of being animals. The emergence of such human rights-like animal rights is not only reflected in a rise of academic theorizing but also observable in legal practice. In both realms there is an upcoming trend to frame animal’s rights in the language of human rights and to discuss the former as a normative derivation of the latter as 4th generation human rights. This development comes at a time when human rights are still precarious notwithstanding their status as moral legal and political lingua franca. The idea of extending human rights to [4] Saskia Stucki, animals may be seen as adding to the fragile status of human rights as it Juan Perez, challenges one of the few assumption human rights theorists generally Max Planck Institute for Human Rights and Animal Rights: agree upon: that human rights are human. It is thus likely to engender Pedro Sanchez, Comparative Public Law and International Law Divergence or Convergence? considerable criticism adverting to the detrimental effects of the incipient Carlos Navarrete, âdehumanization (and decline) of the humanist project of human rights. Branda Nava Intuitions that animal rights are bad for human rights seem to presume an antagonistic dynamism between these two species of rights. But what if to the contrary human and animal rights converged and were mutually reinforcing rather than inhibiting and asserting animal’s rights would be beneficial to humans rights? This paper sets out to explore such parallelisms overlaps and interrelations between human and animal rights. It will undertake (1) a conceptual analysis of the philosophical foundations of human rights with regard to their implications for animals. The paper will (2) furthermore examine the historical and political intertwinement between humans and animals with a special focus on the recurring theme of dehumanization through animalization. In the judeo-christian tradition as in many ancient religions the sacrifice of animals is one of the common practices to represent or symbolize the action of man with his gods. Humans are distinguished precisely from non-human animals by the performance of rites: at birth reproduction and death. It is a whole set of human activities to have a religious experience and somehow communicate with the god in whom they believe. Then in this connection between man and god we find nature that is animals. Animals are the [5] Mauro Pérez Lamb of God: From the Rite of Sacrifice to a communication link between man and god and properly the life and blood of animals. In fact today isolated communities continue to kill animals as an Bravo Vision of Brotherhood expression of religious sentiment. However we find signs of fraternity with animals in some religious traditions in christianity for example Francis of Assisi is the show par excellence and the culmination of a religious solidarity with animals where they are considered perhaps not conscious way as subjects of rights and to which they should be respected their natural life as humans. It is thus that we intend to analyze the ethical or legal presuppositions that can be derived from this religious expression more fraternal and in solidarity with nonhuman animals. From the passion of Christ to the calvary of animals, dominant christian theological paradigms have traditionally believed in the ascendancy of humankind over that of the natural world and its animals placing humans at the center of creation. Consequently animals are believed to be inferior beings at the service of people. The current environmental crisis can be seen as a reflection of this unbalanced relationship. Thus arise ethical as well as theological questions about humankind’s role and stewardship regarding Fraternité Sacerdotale From The Passion of Christ to the Calvary of animals and nature. The aim of my recent artwork is to approach these [8] Estela Torres et laique internationale questions and have these two disciplines come into dialog. Animal passion is Animals pour le respect animal series of drawings started in 2013 in conjunction with my research on animal theology. The aim of these drawings is to parallel in images and in discourse the suffering of Christ as a persecuted innocent put to death with the suffering of the innocent and the voiceless put to death which are the animals. This is done by the juxtaposition of images taken from internet about animal mistreatment with those of religious representations taken from the history of art such as scenes of the passion and crucifixion of Christ from Velazquez, Ribera, El Greco etc. In our presentation we would like to introduce the exhibition project ANIMAL LOVERS dealing with current artistic positions on human-animal relations that we realised in 2016 at nGbK Berlin (art association www.nGbK.de). The project embarks on a search for emancipated human- animal relationships. It questions to what extent animals are and can be involved as agents in social processes. According to the transdisciplinary academic field of human-animal studies a change of perspective has also emerged in the artistic research field. We collaborated with artists that regard animals not as “the other” or as a projection surface for human desires and fears but emphasize on seeing them as individuals with capabilities and rights they deal with the ramifications of a reorganisation of coexistence. After a short outline of our concept and research that includes the possibility of artistic collaboration with animals we will introduce [9] Anne Hoelck, Ute ANIMAL LOVERS: Artistic Positions On The selected art works that were contributed by 14 international artists and Meinblau e.V. artist's collectives a.o. Ant Farm, Ines Lechleitner, Hörner/Antlfinger, Hoerner Current Debate Of Human-Animal Relations SinKabeza Productions and NEOZOON. They expose critically contradictions and clichés in the daily and medialised treatment of animals perform in companionship with animals and invent scenarios of architectures that allows both humans and animals to find their bearings in the habitat of the other. Our aim is to spread our artistic research dedicated to the human- animal question and expand our network of activists artistic and academic researchers in this field. Our exhibition was accompanied by the symposium »Networking Animal Lovers« that took place on the 4th and 5th of November 2016 at ngbk Berlin and our publication including essays on the current debate of human-animal relations a.o. by Kim Stallwood Hilda Kean Will Kymlicka & Sue Donaldson and Hilal Sezgin. April 2017 by Anne Hölck and Ute Hörner. Please find the catalogue (incl.cvs) and the essay publication HERE: HTTP://WE- ANIMALS.DE/DATA/AL_CATALOGUE+ESSAYS.PDF My proposed presentation rooted in my doctoral studies on the same subject focusses on the classic mode of human-animal othering often implicit in media-based cultural discourses. My talk explores how rigid “respectively fluid“ the above alterity is via measuring ambiguity tolerance towards hybrid states (e.g. conceiving of humans as chimpanzees apes primates mammals animals; conceiving of non-human animals as persons humans etc.) As reflected in electronic archives covering 16 years of newspaper reporting in the UK (1995-2010) and then subjecting this data to both a quantitative and qualitative analysis measuring the fluctuation of this ambiguity tolerance.my results strongly indicate a distinct “millennial effect” of intolerance and human-exceptionalist essentialism under wider societal Toward an Animal Democracy Not an stress states such as war economic downturns etc. This suggests that [10] Kathleen Bryson received understandings of concrete descriptions in evolutionary theory Animal Kingdom such as “human” “animal” and even “species” may function as cultural concepts considered to be natural kinds but also are temporally malleable in both popular and academic discourses. By comparing this socially prescribed human-animal alterity to additional alterities (human-machine heterosexual- homosexual male-female) that I similarly subjected to a statistical analysis during the same 1995-2010 time period I show quantitatively and qualitatively that essentialist thinking “as expressed by ambiguity (in)tolerance in socially empowered individuals” functions as an infrahumanisation mechanism to protect one’s perceived ingroup be that humans males or heterosexuals. I argue instead for an ultrahumanisation that may allow for less anthropocentrism less androcentrism and less heterocentrism. From the perspective of social philosophy we do not start with a concept of law but with the concept of moral obligations among human beings. In the ethical sense "obligation" is a relational concept. Individuals have moral obligations to their parents, siblings, employers, etc and civic and religious obligations as well. Often philosophers say that human rights engender obligations or duties. However from the social perspective moral obligations take precedence over legal requirements. Instead of thinking that the foundation of moral obligations lies in legal rights it is better to recognize that legal rights are founded on moral obligations. From a social philosophy perspective it would be better to ask the question: which of the moral obligations we have to animals can in turn give rise to legal rights of animals? Sue Donaldson
Recommended publications
  • Nonhuman Rights to Personhood
    Pace Environmental Law Review Volume 30 Issue 3 Summer 2013 Article 10 July 2013 Nonhuman Rights to Personhood Steven M. Wise Nonhuman Rights Project Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven M. Wise, Nonhuman Rights to Personhood, 30 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 1278 (2013) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol30/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Environmental Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DYSON LECTURE Nonhuman Rights to Personhood STEVEN M. WISE I. INTRODUCTION Thank you all for joining us for the second Dyson Lecture of 2012. We were very lucky to have a first Dyson Lecture, and we will have an even more successful lecture this time. We have a very distinguished person I will talk about in just a second. I’m David Cassuto, a Pace Law School professor. I teach among other things, Animal Law, and that is why I am very familiar with Professor Wise’s work. I want to say a few words about the Dyson Lecture. The Dyson Distinguished Lecture was endowed in 1982 by a gift from the Dyson Foundation, which was made possible through the generosity of the late Charles Dyson, a 1930 graduate, trustee, and long-time benefactor of Pace University. The principle aim of the Dyson Lecture is to encourage and make possible scholarly legal contributions of high quality in furtherance of Pace Law School’s educational mission and that is very much what we are going to have today.
    [Show full text]
  • COURT of APPEALS of the STATE of NEW YORK ------X in the Matter of a Proceeding Under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
    COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of a Proceeding under Article 70 of the CPLR for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on Index Nos. 162358/15 behalf of TOMMY, (New York County); Petitioner-Appellant, 150149/16 (New York -against- County) PATRICK C. LAVERY, individually and as an of Circle L Trailer Sales, Inc., DIANE LAVERY, and CIRCLE L TRAILER SALES, INC., Respondents-Respondents, THE NONHUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT, INC., on behalf of KIKO, Petitioner-Appellant, -against- CARMEN PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., CHRISTIE E. PRESTI, individually and as an officer and director of The Primate Sanctuary, Inc., and THE PRIMATE SANCTUARY, INC., Respondents-Respondents. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------x MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Elizabeth Stein, Esq. Steven M. Wise, Esq. 5 Dunhill Road (of the Bar of the State of New Hyde Park, New York Massachusetts) 11040 By Permission of the Court (516) 747-4726 5195 NW 112th Terrace [email protected] Coral Springs, Florida 33076 (954) 648-9864 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities ................................................................................... iv Argument .................................................................................................... 1 I. Preliminary Statement
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of American Studies, 52(3), 660-681
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Explore Bristol Research Savvas, T. (2018). The Other Religion of Isaac Bashevis Singer. Journal of American Studies, 52(3), 660-681. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021875817000445 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1017/S0021875817000445 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via CUP at https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-american-studies/article/other-religion-of-isaac- bashevis-singer/CD2A18F086FDF63F29F0884B520BE385. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/pure/about/ebr-terms 1 The Other Religion of Isaac Bashevis Singer Theophilus Savvas, University of Bristol This essay analyzes the later fiction of Nobel Prize-winning writer Isaac Bashevis Singer through the prism of his vegetarianism. Singer figured his adoption of a vegetarian diet in 1962 as a kind of conversion, pronouncing it a “religion” that was central to his being. Here I outline Singer’s vegetarian philosophy, and argue that it was the underlying ethical precept in the fiction written after the conversion. I demonstrate the way in which that ethic informs the presentation of both Judaism and women in Singer’s later writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States
    Exploring the Relationship Between Militarization in the United States and Crime Syndicates in Mexico: A Look at the Legislative Impact on the Pace of Cartel Militarization by Tracy Lynn Maish A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Criminology and Criminal Justice) in the University of Michigan-Dearborn 2021 Master Thesis Committee: Assistant Professor Maya P. Barak, Chair Associate Professor Kevin E. Early Associate Professor Donald E. Shelton Tracy Maish [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8834-4323 © Tracy L. Maish 2021 Acknowledgments The author would like to acknowledge the assistance of their committee and the impact that their guidance had on the process. Without the valuable feedback and enormous patience, this project would not the where it is today. Thank you to Dr. Maya Barak, Dr. Kevin Early, and Dr. Donald Shelton. Your academic mentorship will not be forgotten. ii Table of Contents 1. Acknowledgments ii 2. List of Tables iv 3. List of Figures v 4. Abstract vi 5. Chapter 1 Introduction 1 6. Chapter 2 The Militarization of Law Enforcement Within the United States 8 7. Chapter 3 Cartel Militarization 54 8. Chapter 4 The Look into a Mindset 73 9. Chapter 5 Research Findings 93 10. Chapter 6 Conclusion 108 11. References 112 iii List of Tables Table 1 .......................................................................................................................................... 80 Table 2 .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint for Southern Border Security
    Blueprint for Southern Border Security Chairman Michael T. McCaul Committee on Homeland Security U.S. House of Representatives Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Vision for Border Security .............................................................................................................. 3 Achieve Full Situational Awareness ........................................................................................... 3 Develop Outcome Based Metrics ............................................................................................... 5 Enforce Strong Penalties ............................................................................................................. 6 Leverage State, Local and Tribal Law Enforcement .................................................................. 7 Enhance Command and Control ................................................................................................. 7 Engage Internationally ................................................................................................................ 8 San Diego .................................................................................................................................. 10 El Centro ................................................................................................................................... 13 Yuma ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights
    Book Review Animal Rights Richard A. Posner' Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rightsfor Animals. By Steven M. Wise. Cambridge,Mass.: PerseusBooks, 2000. Pp. 362. $25.00. The "animal rights" movement is gathering steam, and Steven Wise is one of the pistons. A lawyer whose practice is the protection of animals, he has now written a book in which he urges courts in the exercise of their common-law powers of legal rulemaking to confer legally enforceable rights on animals, beginning with chimpanzees and bonobos (the two most intelligent primate species).' Although Wise is well-informed about his subject-the biological as well as legal aspects-this is not an intellectually exciting book. I do not say this in criticism. Remember who Wise is: a practicing lawyer who wants to persuade the legal profession that courts should do much more to protect animals. Judicial innovation proceeds incrementally; as Holmes put it, the courts, in their legislative capacity, "are confined from molar to molecular motions."2 Wise's practitioner's perspective is, as we shall see, both the strength and the weakness of the book. f Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Senior Lecturer, University of Chicago Law School. I thank Michael Boudin, Richard Epstein, Lawrence Lessig, Martha Nussbaum, Charlene Posner, and Cass Sunstein for their very helpful comments on a previous draft of this Review. * Adjunct Professor, John Marshall Law School; Adjunct Professor, Vermont Law School; President, Center for the Expansion of Fundamental Rights; Partner, Wise & Slater-Wise, Boston. 1. These are closely related species, and Wise discusses them more or less interchangeably.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting and Non-Hunting College Student's Perceptions of Wildlife
    Hunting and Non-hunting College Student’s Perceptions of Wildlife and Each Other M. Nils Peterson, North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Turner House, Box 7646 Raleigh, NC 27695-7646 Christopher S. DePerno, North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Turner House, Box 7646 Raleigh, NC 27695-7646 Christopher E. Moorman, North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Turner House, Box 7646 Raleigh, NC 27695-7646 Kathryn A. Cunningham,1 North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Turner House, Box 7646 Raleigh, NC 27695-7646 Jared P. Milrad,2 North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Turner House, Box 7646 Raleigh, NC 27695-7646 Jason D. Riddle,3 North Carolina State University, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Program, Turner House, Box 7646 Raleigh, NC 27695-7646 Toddi A. Steelman, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 Abstract: Hunting has shaped the history of wildlife conservation, but research exploring the relationship between hunting and conservation is new. A decline in the popularity of hunting has spurred research on hunting participation and recruitment, but less is known about how hunting influences societal negotiation of the appropriate roles for humans and wildlife. We addressed this need with a personally administered survey to 320 college students at North Carolina State University (NCSU).
    [Show full text]
  • 'An Incredibly Vile Sport': Campaigns Against Otter Hunting in Britain
    Rural History (2016) 27, 1, 000-000. © Cambridge University Press 2016 ‘An incredibly vile sport’: Campaigns against Otter Hunting in Britain, 1900-39 DANIEL ALLEN, CHARLES WATKINS AND DAVID MATLESS School of Physical and Geographical Sciences, University of Keele, ST5 5BG, UK [email protected] School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK [email protected] [email protected] Abstract: Otter hunting was a minor field sport in Britain but in the early years of the twentieth century a lively campaign to ban it was orchestrated by several individuals and anti-hunting societies. The sport became increasingly popular in the late nineteenth century and the Edwardian period. This paper examines the arguments and methods used in different anti-otter hunting campaigns 1900-1939 by organisations such as the Humanitarian League, the League for the Prohibition of Cruel Sports and the National Association for the Abolition of Cruel Sports. Introduction In 2010 a painting ‘normally considered too upsetting for modern tastes’ which ‘while impressive’ was also ‘undeniably "gruesome"’ was displayed at an exhibition of British sporting art at the Bowes Museum, Barnard Castle. The Guardian reported that the grisly content of the painting was ‘the reason why it was taken off permanent display by its owners’ the Laing Gallery in Newcastle.1 The painting, Sir Edwin Landseer’s The Otter Speared, Portrait of the Earl of Aberdeen's Otterhounds, or the Otter Hunt had been associated with controversy since it was first exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1844 Daniel Allen, Charles Watkins and David Matless 2 (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • WGU Commencement.Qxp WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 1
    2017 WGU Commencement.qxp_WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 1 Commencement d S ATURDAY , F EBRUARY 11, 2017 L AKE B UENA V ISTA , F LORIDA 2017 WGU Commencement.qxp_WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 2 Member Governors Alaska Nevada e Honorable e Honorable Bill Walker Brian Sandoval Arizona New Mexico e Honorable e Honorable Doug Ducey Susana Martinez California North Dakota e Honorable e Honorable Jerry Brown Doug Burgum Colorado Oklahoma e Honorable e Honorable John Hickenlooper Mary Fallin Guam Oregon e Honorable e Honorable Eddie Baza Calvo Kate Brown Hawaii South Dakota e Honorable e Honorable David Ige Dennis Daugaard Idaho Texas e Honorable e Honorable C. L. “Butch” Otter Greg Abbott Indiana Utah e Honorable e Honorable Eric Holcomb Gary R. Herbert Montana Washington e Honorable e Honorable Steve Bullock Jay R. Inslee Nebraska Wyoming e Honorable e Honorable Pete Ricketts Matt Mead -2- 2017 WGU Commencement.qxp_WGU Commencement 1/23/17 10:24 AM Page 3 Board of Trustees C HAIRMAN e Honorable Jim Geringer Director, Policy & Public Sector, ESRI; Governor, State of Wyoming (1995 – 2003) John W. Bluford III Tammy Johns President, Bluford Healthcare Leadership Institute; CEO, Strategy & Talent; Former President, Truman Medical Centers Former Executive, Manpower Group Cole Clark Dr. Robert W. Mendenhall Executive Director, Higher Education Client Relations President Emeritus, Deloitte Services, LP; Western Governors University Former Global VP for Education and Research, Oracle Corporation Lenny Mendonca Director Emeritus, McKinsey & Company Dr. erese (Terry) Crane President, Crane Associates; Scott D. Pulsipher Former Executive with Apple and AOL President, Western Governors University Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • January-2021-Newsletter-4
    JANUARY NEWSLETTER 2021 MESSAGE FROM OUR BOARD 2020! That’s a wrap! Phew, these final few months have been incredibly busy for our team. Between the Memorial service, markets, Purdy’s Chocolate Fundraiser, Santa Pics, and Grinch Tree fundraisers, the end of 2020 helped us recover from our closure earlier in the year. We brought in large numbers of animals since the start of September and adopted out 34 in the last quarter of the year. In total, we finish the year with 48 total adoptions and 14 animals still in care. Just a week into 2021 we have already brought 17 more cats and kittens into our program and committed to bringing 46 dogs from our partner organization in China at the end of January details below. We hope restrictions will ease this year and allow for more events, but as we navigate these challenges, we continue to adapt and try new ways of creative fundraising. If you are looking to get involved, now is the time. We are going to set up a fundraising committee to help with planning and running events. If you would like to get involved, please email [email protected] DATES FOR YOUR DIARY 2021 JAN 11 - PAULS PIZZA FUNDRAISER - SHAWNESSY LOCATION JAN 25 - SLEEP ROVER MINI PHOTOSHOOT JAN 28 - SLEEP ROVER MINI PHOTOSHOOT FEB 1 - PAULS PIZZA FUNDRAISER - AIRDRIE LOCATION ONLINE AUCTION - DATE TO BE CONFIRMED WWW.RESCUEFRIENDS.CA | [email protected] CAN YOUPARTNERSHIP GIVE THIS LITTLE WITH ROCKET SAVINGMAN HARBIN A HOME? DOGS A major new project for 2021 is our partnership with Saving Harbin Dogs in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Experimentation in India
    Animal Defenders International ● National Anti-Vivisection Society Animal Experimentation in India Unfettered science: How lack of accountability and control has led to animal abuse and poor science “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated. Vivisection is the blackest of all the black crimes that man is at present committing against God and His fair creation. It ill becomes us to invoke in our daily prayers the blessings of God, the Compassionate, if we in turn will not practise elementary compassion towards our fellow creatures.” And, “I abhor vivisection with my whole soul. All the scientific discoveries stained with the innocent blood I count as of no consequence.” Mahatma Gandhi Thanks With thanks to Maneka Gandhi and the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) of India for their report on the use of animals in laboratories, which has been used for this critique of the state of scientific and medical research in India. Animal Defenders International and the National Anti-Vivisection Society UK fully support and encourage the efforts of the members of India’s CPCSEA to enforce standards and controls over the use of animals in laboratories in India, and their recommendation that facilities and practices in India’s research laboratories be brought up to international standards of good laboratory practice, good animal welfare, and good science. Contributors Jan Creamer Tim Phillips Chris Brock Robert Martin ©2003 Animal Defenders International & National Anti-Vivisection Society ISBN: Animal Defenders International 261 Goldhawk Road, London W12 9PE, UK tel.
    [Show full text]