[Edit]Origin of Caterpillar Name Move to Peoria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[Edit]Origin of Caterpillar Name Move to Peoria Caterpillar Inc. (NYSE: CAT), also known as "CAT", designs, manufactures, markets and sells machinery and engines and sells financial products andinsurance to customers via a worldwide dealer network.[2][3] Caterpillar is the world's largest manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines and industrial gas turbines.[2] With more than US$70 billion in assets, Caterpillar was ranked number one in its industry and number 44 overall in the 2009 Fortune 500.[6] Caterpillar stock is a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.[7] Caterpillar Inc. traces its origins to the 1925 merger of the Holt Manufacturing Company and the C. L. Best Tractor Company, creating a new entity, the California based Caterpillar Tractor Company.[8] In 1986, the company re-organized itself as a Delaware corporation under the current name, Caterpillar Inc.[3] Caterpillar's headquarters are located in Peoria, Illinois, United States.[1] In the late 1890s and early 1900s, competitors Daniel Best and Benjamin Holt individually experimented with ways to improve the traction of steam tractors used in farming California's Central Valley. [edit]Origin of Caterpillar name The steam tractors of the 1890s and early 1900s were extremely heavy, sometimes weighing 1,000 pounds (450 kg) per horsepower, and often sank into the rich, soft earth of the San Joaquin Valley Delta farmland surrounding Stockton, California. Benjamin Holt attempted to fix the problem by increasing the size and width of the wheels up to 7.5 feet (2.3 m) tall and 6 feet (1.8 m) wide, producing a tractor 46 feet (14 m) wide. But this also made the tractors increasingly complex, expensive and difficult to maintain. Another solution considered was to lay a temporary plank road ahead of the steam tractor, but this was time- consuming, expensive, and interfered with earthmoving. Holt thought of wrapping the planks around the wheels. He replaced the wheels on a 40 horsepower (30 kW) Holt steamer, No. 77, with a set of wooden tracks bolted to chains. On Thanksgiving Day, November 24, 1904, he successfully tested the updated machine plowing the soggydelta land of Roberts Island.[10] Company photographer Charles Clements was reported to have observed that the tractor crawled like a caterpillar,[2] and Holt seized on the metaphor. "Caterpillar it is. That's the name for it!"[10] Some sources, though, attribute this name to British soldiers in July 1907.[11] Two years later Holt sold his first steam- powered tractor crawlers for US$5,500. Each side featured a track frame measured 30 inches (760 mm) high by 42 inches (1,100 mm) wide and were 9 feet (2.7 m) long. The tracks were 3 inches (76 mm) by 4 inches (100 mm) redwood slats.[10] Holt received the first patent for a practical continuous track for use with a tractor on December 7, 1907 for his improved "Traction Engine" ("improvement in vehicles, and especially of the traction engine class; and included endless traveling platform supports upon which the engine is carried" Move to Peoria In February 16, 1910,[13] Holt opened up a plant in East Peoria, Illinois, led by his nephew Pliny Holt. There Pliny met farm implement dealer Murray Baker who knew of an empty factory that had been recently built to manufacture farm implements and steam traction engines. Baker, who later became the first executive vice president of what became Caterpillar Tractor Company, wrote to Holt headquarters in Stockton and described the plant of the bankrupt Colean Manufacturing Co. of East Peoria, Illinois. On October 25, 1909, Pliny Holt purchased the factory,[14] and immediately began operations with 12 employees.[15] Holt incorporated it as the Holt Caterpillar Company, although he did not trademark the name Caterpillar until August 2, 1910.[13] The addition of a plant in the Midwest, despite the hefty capital needed to retool the plant, proved so profitable that only two years later the company employed 625 people and was exporting tractors toArgentina, Canada, and Mexico.[16] Tractors were built in both Stockton and East Peoria.[17][18] [edit]Use in World War I Holt's track-type tractors play a support role in World War I. Even before the U.S. formally entered WWI, Holt had shipped 1,200 tractors to England, France and Russia for agricultural purposes. These governments, however, sent the tractors directly to the battlefront where the military put them to work hauling artillery and supplies.[19] When World War I broke out, the British War Office ordered a Holt tractor and put it through trials at Aldershot. The War Office was suitably impressed and chose it as a gun-tractor.[20] Over the next four years, the Holt tractor became a major artillery tractor, mainly used to haul medium guns like the 6-inch howitzer, the 60-pounder, and later the 9.2-inch howitzer.[21] Holt tractors were also the inspiration for the development of the British tank, which profoundly altered ground warfare tactics.[10][22] Major Ernest Swinton, sent to France as an army war correspondent, very soon saw the potential of a track-laying tractor.[23]:116 Although the British later chose an English firm to build its first tanks, the Holt tractor became "one of the most important military vehicles of all time."[21] [edit]Post-war challenges Holt tractors had become well-known during World War I. Military contracts formed the major part of the company's production. When the war ended, Holt's planned expansion to meet the military's needs was abruptly terminated. The heavy-duty tractors needed by the military were unsuitable for farmers. The company's situation worsened when artillery tractors were returned from Europe, depressing prices for new equipment and Holt's unsold inventory of military tractors. The company struggled with the transition from wartime boom to peacetime bust. To keep the company afloat, they borrowed heavily. C. L. Best Gas Tractor Company, formed by Clarence Leo Best in 1910 and Holt's primary competitor, had during the war received government support enabling it to supply farmers with the smaller agricultural tractors they needed.[24][25] As a result, Best had gained a considerable market advantage over Holt by war's end. Best also assumed considerable debt to allow it to continue expansion, especially production of its new Best Model 60 "Tracklayer". Both companies were adversely impacted by the transition from a wartime to a peacetime economy, which contributed to a nationwide depression, further inhibiting sales. On December 5, 1920, 71-year-old Benjamin Holt died after a month-long illness.[25][26] [edit]Caterpillar company formed The banks who held the company's large debt forced the Holt board of directors to accept their candidate, Thomas A. Baxter, to succeed Benjamin Holt. Baxter initially cut the large tractors from the company's product line and introduced smaller models focused on the agricultural market. When the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1921 funded a US$1 billion federal highway building program, Baxter began re-focusing the company towards building road construction equipment.[14]:66 Both companies also faced fierce competition from the Fordson company. Between 1907 and 1918, Best and Holt had spent about US$1.5 million in legal fees fighting each other in a number of contractual, trademark and patent infringement lawsuits.[27] Harry H. Fair of the bond brokerage house of Pierce, Fair & Company of San Francisco had helped to finance C. L. Best's debt and Holt shareholders approached him about their company's financial difficulty. Fair recommended that the two companies should merge. In April and May 1925, the financially stronger C. L. Best merged with the market leader Holt Caterpillar to form the Caterpillar Tractor Co.[28] The new company was headquartered in San Leandro until 1930, when under the terms of the merger it was moved to Peoria.[15] Baxter had been removed as CEO earlier in 1925, and Clarence Leo Best assumed the title of CEO, and remained in that role until October 1951.[24] The Caterpillar company consolidated its product lines, offering only five track-type tractors: the 2 Ton, 5 Ton, and 10 Ton from the Holt Manufacturing Company's old product line and the Caterpillar 30and Caterpillar 60 from the C. L. Best Tractor Co.'s former product line. The 10 Ton and 5 Ton models were discontinued in 1926. In 1928, the 2 Ton was discontinued. Sales the first year were US$13 million. By 1929, sales climbed to US$52.8 million, and CAT continued to grow throughout the Great Depression of the 1930s. Caterpillar adopted the diesel engine to replace gasoline engines. During World War II, Caterpillar products found fame with the Seabees, Construction Battalions of the United States Navy, who builtairfields and other facilities in the Pacific Theater of Operations. During the post-war construction boom, the company grew at a rapid pace and launched its first venture outside the U.S. in 1950, marking the beginning of Caterpillar's development into a multinational corporation. [edit]Expansion in developing markets Caterpillar built its first Russian facility in the town of Tosno, located near St. Petersburg, Russia. It was completed in 16 months and occupied in November 1999. It had the first electrical substation built in the Leningrad Oblast since the Communist government was dissolved on December 26, 1991. The facility was built under harsh winter conditions, where the temperature was below −25°C. The facility construction was managed Lemminkäinen Group located in Helsinki, Finland.[citation needed] The $125M Caterpillar Suzhou, People's Republic of China facility, manufactures medium wheel loaders and motorgraders, primarily for the Asian market.
Recommended publications
  • A History of RG Letourneau's Earliest Scrapers
    A History of R.G. LeTourneau’s Earliest Scrapers: Culminating in the 1922 Mountain Mover 1 John H. Niemelä, Ph.D. Research Assistant: Dale Hardy Commemorating the November 29, 2004, Designation by the A.S.M.E. of R.G. LeTourneau’s Mountain Mover at LeTourneau University, Longview, TX as a Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark November 29, 2004 Version 1.1B (October 31, 2007) © All Rights Reserved 1 This is the most recent revision of a paper submitted to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers: “Nomination of R.G. LeTourneau’s Mountain Mover for ASME Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark.” Four minor revisions have preceded this one: 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, and 1.04. The first major revision was 1.1A. This is a minor revision. The next minor one would be 1.1C. The next major revision would be 1.2A. * signifies that reference materials cited within a footnote contain pertinent pictures. A PERSONAL INTRODUCTION The present author’s interest in R.G. LeTourneau is long-standing. My father, George Niemelä, Sr., was a mechanic, welder, heavy-equipment operator, and businessman in northern California. When the author was a boy, Dad worked for R.G.’s brothers-in-law (Howard and Buster Peterson) at Peterson Tractor, a Caterpillar dealership based in San Leandro, CA. He was a machinist/welder in the first crew of Peterson’s Roller Exchange Shop. 2 In 1961 Dad opened an equipment rental yard in Stockton, CA (Bee Wise Tool and Equipment Rental). His business was two blocks from a Montgomery-Ward warehouse that once was R.G.’s second Stockton factory (built in 1930, expanded in 1934).
    [Show full text]
  • Fordson Model F Dearborn, MI 1917
    Fordson Model F Dearborn, MI 1917 The story of Fordson tractors begins The Fordson name was selected for Ford stopped tractor production in with Henry Ford. Born in 1863 in two reasons. First, there was already a the U.S. in 1928, choosing instead to Dearborn, Michigan, Henry Ford’s company in Minneapolis using the name focus on the new Model A automobile parents had moved to the U.S. from “Ford Tractor Company,” trying to that would be replacing the Model T. near Cork in Ireland and now ran a large capitalize on the name of very successful However, Fordson production continued farm of several hundred acres. Young Ford Model T by tricking customers into in Cork, Ireland, and later in Dagenham, Henry soon found farm work hard and believing the tractor was made by Henry England. After Fordson production was preferred tinkering with machines to Ford. Second, the shareholders of the transferred to Cork, exports to the U.S. laboring on the farm. Fortunately, his Ford Motor Company did not approve of were limited to 1,500 a month, which father approved of Henry’s inclination to tractor production and wanted nothing restricted sales at Ford dealerships. take machines apart and put them back to do with it. So in 1920, Henry Ford and together. In 1903, Ford formed the Ford his son, Edsel, established an entirely The original Fordson Model F tractor Motor Company using his knowledge new firm, “Ford and Son, Inc.,” which was was eventually outsold by International of machinery to turn his hobby into a later shortened to just “Fordson”.
    [Show full text]
  • K0-41Io ARMO'r on OKINAWA
    I k0-41io ARMO'R ON OKINAWA A RESEARCH REPORT PREPARED BY COL2JIaTTEE 1., OFFICERS ADV~ANCED COURSE THE ARIJJDD SCHOOL 1948-1949 MAJOR J.1L. BALTHIS ML.AJOR P. Go. SHOMffONEK MAJOR R. B. CRAYTON4 M.,AJOR L. H. JOHNSO CAPTAIN T. Q. DONALDSON CAr~PT'l4 D. L. JOHNvSON CAPTAIN W. Jo HYDE 1st LIEUTENANTd.To. WOODSON, JR. FORT K§v"OX, KH&!TUCKY MA1Y 1949 e A t- L - A ARMOR OKNA WA "-4j ~i4L f -' lip .V1 (1', July 1886-i8 June 1)/45) bon3 ul 1I6 ie&P Iunf ordile Ky., son of the cel-ebrated Confederate general, Simon Bolivar Buckner. The onerBuckner ch,,ose a mii ta,,r career, as had his father. 1 fter attending the iirgnia ilitry Istiute, he entered th-e U-,nited States Ml itary AIcadem, from.r which. h-e graduated in 1903. He was instruc- w--r in -,ilit-ry tactics at WIest Point from 1919 to 1923, and- COM- 2andant of cadets from 193)'2 to 1936 . Dudring World .Jar I, h-e comn- -unaded aviat'1ion training brigades. -:ieral Buckner was given, comuand of th e 1 1as a r6efenie force in dyan 940plyeda pomientrole in t1,e recapture of the -euionsin 1942-43. He was awarded the D.S.M,. in Oct. '1943, ' 1 Promoted t te4te iplDorary rank- o.L eter Generl. 1-was - Ler sent to t-he Ccntral PacifcComn, hr ho gai-ned cormmand the, new,, U.S. TNT1H A2LY. T1his a ,under his cormmand, invaded JNL~kI, on 1 A'pril 11945,95in1 three days bef'ore the lose of the Okinawan camnaign, General Buckner was fatally wounded r by a piece of coral, ahrcwn by the expl1osion of an c-eyartill cry S'4 PREFACE The capture of OKINAWIA was essentially en infantry effort with the result tha-).t armor wtuas at all times in support of infantry units.
    [Show full text]
  • IH/Farmall Tractors Parts and Price List
    The Fordson House IH/Farmall Tractors Parts and Price List All prices on this list prevail over preceding price lists. Prices are subject to change without notice. Catalog updated : 4/30/2010 THE FORDSON HOUSE 717 Stephenson Avenue Escanaba, Michigan (MI) U. S. A. 49829 Phone (906) 786-5120 Fax (906) 789-5540 Email: [email protected] On the web at: www/thefordsonhouse.com The Fordson House 1 IH Parts and Price List Our Core Values Consistently serving our friends and customers to the best of our skills TRUST and abilities. Providing quality service for our RESPECT friends and customers in appreciation of their business Striving to be the best we can be and vowing to never stop EXCELLENCE learning Devoting our energies and skills to help improve the quality and COMMITMENT availability of parts to our friends and customers Your satisfaction is guaranteed. If, for any reason, you are dissatisfied with your purchase, please return the part along with POLICY an explanation of the problem within 30 days, and we will replace the part or refund the purchase price The Fordson House 2 IH Parts and Price List Table of Contents Page 4 Tractor Dating Guide ( By Serial #) 5 F-12 & F-14 Tractors 11 Regular and F-20 Tractors 19 F-30 & W-30 Tractors 25 10-20 Tractors 32 15-30 & 22-36 Tractors 38 Whittek Tower Hose Clamps 38 Fenders 39 Paint 40 Publications 37 Decals 38 Ordering Information 39 Order Form The Fordson House 3 IH Parts and Price List Farmall & McCormick-Deering Tractor Serial Numbers by Tractor and Date Farmall Regular and Fairway
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Session 3 “Technology to Seize an Enemy-Held Shore”
    Part II Session 3 “Technology to Seize an Enemy-held Shore” 1 Opposed Allied Amphibious Operations Prior to Normandy-Many Painful Lessons • UK-Norway, April 1940 • UK-Dakar, September 1940 • UK-Madagascar, May 1942 • UK/Canadian-Dieppe raid on the French coast, August 1942 • US/UK-Torch-Casablanca, Oran and Algiers, Nov 1942 • US/UK- Sicily/Italy – Sicily (Husky), Salerno (Avalanche), Anzio (Shingle), July –September 1943 2 “How to seize an enemy-held shore” • Examine from that past, then plan, plan, review the plan and exercise what you can of the plan. • Make sure that some one was in-charge of each action and was drilled in what to do. • What are the Germans doing and what would be a German response? Plan for that response. • Special training, new weapons, what do you need to clear the beach, how do you protect the landing forces, where is the unified command and control? 3 “How to seize an enemy-held shore” • While some of this sessions applies in the Pacific, the context here is a build up for the Normandy invasion: - One million troops and a 100,000 vehicles and everything needed to kept functioning. - The Normandy invasion was on the shore of a continent. • The Pacific War was a series of island invasions or jungle enclaves in New Guinea. No opposing armor, limited air cover or the probably of massed reserves. • Only the Philippine invasion and the possible invasion of the Japanese home Islands in November 1945 had the scope of Normandy. 4 What a Successful Amphibious Landing Requires-1 • Off-shore Command ships containing cooperative inter- service and inter-Allied staffs functioning below the Senior Chiefs level.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-88-77 Army Disposal
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on GAO>; Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives September 1988 ARMYDISPOSAL Construction Equipment Prematurely Disposed of in Europe RESTRKTED-Not to be released outside the Gend Accounting Office except on the basis of the specifk 8~4 by the Of&e of CongressionalRelations. United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-229358 September 20,1988 The Honorable John Dingell Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: The Army, having decided that its fleet of construction vehicles was becoming too costly to keep in repair, directed European units in 1985 to dispose of commercially available combat engineer construction vehi- cles. The Army purchased 850 replacement vehicles for Europe costing about $79 million. The purchase was part of a worldwide replacement program totaling about $470 million through fiscal year 1987. As you requested, we reviewed the Army’s replacement of construction vehicles in Europe. Our objective was to determine the basis for replac- ing these vehicles. We agree with the Army’s goal to replace worn-out vehicles with stan- dardized ones, but question its decision to dispose of usable vehicles without showing that it was cost-effective to do so. Army officials stated that old construction vehicles were difficult to support and that high repair costs made replacing the entire fleet -regardless of condi- tion-cost-effective. We found no analyses to support the Army’s position.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2021 Plus
    WINTER 2021 PLUS. PLUS Winter 2021 1 Front Cover: TasPort’s new D9T Dozer at WELCOME the Burnie chip export terminal Welcome to the Winter 2021 edition of PLUS magazine. investment in our Clayton head office (just as we’ve finished technology group within William Adams is helping VICTORIA TASMANIA one upgrade, we’re planning the next…). Plans are afoot to customers take advantage of everything that Cat machines After last year’s lockdowns, I’m relieved to be writing add new workshop facilities, including both a Component have got on board. Among the biggest technological this letter from our head office in Clayton, which is now Rebuild Centre (CRC) and a new Central Distribution Centre developments are the new machines’ 3D capabilities, which CLAYTON HORSHAM BENDIGO GEELONG LAUNCESTON 81-83 Dimboola Road 11A Trantara Court Cnr Fyans & Crown Street 308 George Town Road operating at 100 percent capacity – and it’s great to be (CDC), for our parts operation. allow operators to dig accurately to their designs, allowing (HEAD OFFICE) Horsham VIC 3400 East Bendigo VIC 3550 Geelong South VIC 3220 Rocherlea TAS 7248 back. Our William Adams team adapted quickly and for greater safety and productivity. 17-55 Nantilla Road (03) 5362 4100 (03) 5434 2140 (03) 5223 5200 (03) 6325 0900 successfully to remote working last year, but nothing beats The CRC will be a state-of-the-art facility where we can Clayton VIC 3168 the ability to meet face-to-face with colleagues and, of centralise the rebuilding of machine components like If you’re keen to know more about Cat’s industry-leading (03) 9566 0666 course, being able to welcome our valued customers back engines, transmissions, power trains and final drives, and tech, we’ll be holding our William Adams Cat Live festival HOBART on site.
    [Show full text]
  • Simplify the of Rear Wheel Arch Panel for the Caterpillar 980H Medium Wheel Loader
    Simplify the of Rear Wheel Arch Panel for the Caterpillar 980H Medium Wheel Loader A Major Qualifying Project submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of the Bachelor of Science. Submitted By: Peter Wallace Brendan McLaughlin In partnership with Shanghai University and Partners: Weiqing Chu Mengyuan Guo Chao Xie Sponsoring Agency: Caterpillar Inc. Advisors: Kevin Rong Xiuling Huang Amy Zeng Shuai Guo AUTHORSHIP ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………….Brendan INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….Peter BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………..….Brendan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………….…Peter OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………..Peter/Brendan METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………………..……Peter RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………..Brendan RECOMMENDATIONS/CONCLUSIONS……………………………..…Peter/Brendan 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Our group would like to thank the following individuals for their help and support throughout this project: Scott Panse, Engineer at Caterpillar Professor Xiuling Huang, Shanghai University Kevin Rong, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Amy Zeng, Worcester Polytechnic Institute 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authorship ........................................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... 2 List of figures ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ltd Catalogue 23 Jan 2016
    Watts & Associates (Auctioneers) Ltd Catalogue 23 Jan 2016 *1 Box of MAKITA metal grinding/cutting wheels *46 STANLEY tripod stand & level kit *2 Box of MAKITA metal grinding/cutting wheels *47 MAKITA 4304T 110v jig saw *3 Box of MAKITA metal grinding/cutting wheels *48 MAKITA 4304T 110v jig saw *4 Box of MAKITA metal grinding/cutting wheels *49 PASLODE IM65 nail gun c/w case *5 Box of MAKITA metal grinding/cutting wheels *50 PASLODE IM65 nail gun c/w case *6 MAKITA 110v breaker *51 PASLODE IM250 nail gun c/w case *7 MAKITA HM4500C 110v SDS breaker *52 DEWALT 18v drill c/w battery, charger & case *8 MAKITA HM0860C 110v SDS breaker *53 MAKITA radio *9 MAKITA HMO860 110v breaker 54 3 x 110v saws *10 MAKITA HR401 110v demolition breaker *57 HILTI DSH700 petrol stone saw *11 MAKITA TWO650 1/2" 110v impact gun *58 MAKITA 4340CT 110v jigsaw c/w case *12 MAKITA HM0860C 110v demolition hammer *59 MAKITA 24v SDS drill c/w case (no batteries) *13 MAKITA HM0870C 110v demolition hammer *60 MAKITA 6824 110v tek gun c/w case *14 MAKITA HM1100C 110v breaker *61 MAKITA HM1100C 110v breaker c/w case *15 MAKITA HM1100C 110v breaker *62 MAKITA HM1100C 110v breaker c/w case *16 MAKITA HR3540C 110v SDS rotary hammer drill *63 MAKITA 6834 110v screw gun c/w case *17 MAKITA HR3000C 110v hammer drill *64 MAKITA 6834 110v screw gun c/w case *18 MAKITA 6013B 110v rotary drill *65 MAKITA BHR200 24v hammer drill c/w 2 x *19 MAKITA HR2070 110v drill batteries, charger & case 20 BOSCH GWS7-1115 4" grinder *66 MAKITA BHR200 24v hammer drill c/w battery, charger & case
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of British Tactical and Operational Tank Doctrine and Training in the First World War
    The evolution of British tactical and operational tank doctrine and training in the First World War PHILIP RICHARD VENTHAM TD BA (Hons.) MA. Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy by the University of Wolverhampton October 2016 ©Copyright P R Ventham 1 ABSTRACT Tanks were first used in action in September 1916. There had been no previous combat experience on which to base tactical and operational doctrine for the employment of this novel weapon of war. Training of crews and commanders was hampered by lack of vehicles and weapons. Time was short in which to train novice crews. Training facilities were limited. Despite mechanical limitations of the early machines and their vulnerability to adverse ground conditions, the tanks achieved moderate success in their initial actions. Advocates of the tanks, such as Fuller and Elles, worked hard to convince the sceptical of the value of the tank. Two years later, tanks had gained the support of most senior commanders. Doctrine, based on practical combat experience, had evolved both within the Tank Corps and at GHQ and higher command. Despite dramatic improvements in the design, functionality and reliability of the later marks of heavy and medium tanks, they still remained slow and vulnerable to ground conditions and enemy counter-measures. Competing demands for materiel meant there were never enough tanks to replace casualties and meet the demands of formation commanders. This thesis will argue that the somewhat patchy performance of the armoured vehicles in the final months of the war was less a product of poor doctrinal guidance and inadequate training than of an insufficiency of tanks and the difficulties of providing enough tanks in the right locations at the right time to meet the requirements of the manoeuvre battles of the ‘Hundred Days’.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2017 Plus
    WINTER 2017 PLUS. PLUS Winter 2017 1 WELCOME CLAYTON TRARALGON GEELONG (HEAD OFFICE) 25-27 Standing Drive Cnr Fyans & Crown Street 17-55 Nantilla Road Traralgon VIC 3844 Geelong South VIC 3220 Clayton VIC 3168 (03) 5175 6200 (03) 5223 5223 (03) 9566 0666 General Manager, Sales SWAN HILL LAVERTON DANDENONG 36-38 Curlewis Street 32-42 Spencer Street Swan Hill VIC 3585 Sunshine West VIC 3028 Ryan O’ Doherty 2-4 Fowler Rd, Dandenong South VIC 3175 (03) 5036 3900 (03) 9931 9666 (03) 9767 3600 BENDIGO TASMANIA MILDURA 11a Trantara Court 345 Benetook Avenue East Bendigo VIC 3550 (03) 5444 9199 LAUNCESTON Mildura VIC 3502 308 George Town Road (03) 5018 6100 Rocherlea TAS 7248 PORTLAND (03) 6325 0900 HORSHAM 167 Garden Street 81-83 Dimboola Road Portland VIC 3305 (03) 5521 5100 HOBART Horsham VIC 3400 2 Chardonnay Drive (03) 5362 4100 Berriedale TAS 7011 WODONGA (03) 6249 0566 SHEPPARTON 200 Melbourne Road 7847 Goulburn Valley Highway Wodonga VIC (02) 6051 5800 BURNIE Shepparton VIC 3631 Bass Highway (03) 5832 5500 Somerset TAS 7322 (03) 6433 8888 Designed by meg annabelle design Plus is published by William Adams PTY LTD as one of the many CAT PLUS services provided by your Caterpillar dealer in Victoria and Tasmania. All correspondence or requests for additions to our mailing list should be addressed to; Advertising and Promotion Department William Adams PTY LTD PO. Box 164, Clayton 3168, Australia (03) 9566 0666 1300 WADAMS williamadams.com.au Editorial content in this magazine can be reproduced in other media upon approval granted by William Adams’ advertising and promotion department.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanks and Tank Warfare | International Encyclopedia of The
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 17 May 2016 Tanks and Tank Warfare By Michael David Kennedy World War I introduced new technologies and doctrine in a quest to overcome the tactical stalemate of the trenches. The first tanks had great potential that would be capitalized upon during the next world war, but early models suffered from design flaws and lack of doctrine for their use on the battlefield. Table of Contents 1 Definition and Background 2 Characteristics 3 Development in Great Britain 4 Battle of the Somme (1 July-18 November 1916) 5 Battle of Cambrai (20-30 November 1917) 6 French Tanks 7 German Tanks 8 Tanks in the American Expeditionary Forces 9 Impact of Tanks on World War I Selected Bibliography Citation Definition and Background Tanks are armored vehicles designed to combine the military factors of fire, maneuver and protection. Although the concept of armored vehicles preceded the Great War, the tank was specifically developed to overcome the stalemate of trench warfare on the Western Front that followed the First Battle of Ypres (19 October-22 November 1914). The marrying of recent technological advances, such as the internal combustion engine with armor plating, enabled the tank’s development during World War I. Characteristics The first tanks introduced in 1916 were generally slow and hard to maneuver, and they performed poorly in rugged terrain. The early models were heavily influenced by commercial tractors. While impervious to barbed wire, small arms, and shrapnel, their primitive armor was still susceptible to heavy machine gun fire and direct hits from high explosive artillery rounds.
    [Show full text]