DOCSLIB.ORG

HERODOTUS I I I 1 IV I I BOOKS VIII-IX I I I I L I I I I I I 1 I 1 I L I 1 I 1 I I I I L G Translated by I a D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

I I 1 I 1 OEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY I i I 1 I I I m HERODOTUS I i I 1 IV i I BOOKS VIII-IX I i i I l I I I I i i 1 I 1 i l i 1 i 1 I I i I l g Translated by i A D. GODLEY i i I 1 I I iN Complete list of Lock titles can be V*o Jound at the end of each volume the historian HERODOTUS grc-at Greek was born about 484 B.C., at Halicar- nassus in Caria, Asia Minor, when it was subject to the Persians. He travelled in of Asia widely most Minor, Egypt (as as far Assuan), North Africa, Syria, the country north of the Black Sea, and many parts of the Aegean Sea and the mainland of Greece. He lived, it seems, for some time in Athens, and in 443 went with other colonists to the new city Thurii (in he died about South Italy) where 430 B.C. He was 'the prose correlative of the bard, a narrator of the deeds of real men, and a describer of foreign places' (Murray). His famous history of warfare between the Greeks and the Persians has an epic enhances his dignity which delightful style. It includes the rise of the Persian power and an account of the Persian the empire ; description of Egypt fills one book; because Darius attacked Scythia, the geography and customs of that land are also even in the later books on the given ; the Persians attacks of against Greece there are digressions.o All is most entertainingo a After and produces grand unity. personal inquiry and study of hearsay and other evidence, Herodotus gives us a not un- critical estimate of the best that he could find. 930 <A- Co. (HERODOTUS rv.) THE LOEB CLASSICAL LIBRARY FOUNDED BY JAMES LOEB, LL.D. EDITED BY E. H. WARMINGTON, M.A., F.R.HXST.SOC. FORMER EDITORS fT. E. PAGE, C.H., LITT.D. fE. CAPPS, PH.D., LL.D. fW. H. D. ROUSE, LITT.D. L. A. POST, L.H.D. HEUODOTUS IV 120 HERODOTUS WITH AN ENGLISH TRANSLATION BY A. D. GODLEY HON. FKLLOW OF MAGDALEN COLLEGE, OXFORD IX FOUR VOLUMES IV BOOKS VIII -IX / in CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN LTD MCMLXIX First printed 1925 Reprinted 1930, 1946, 1961, 1969 Printed in Great Britain CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION vii BOOK vm 1 BOOK IX 157 INDEX 303 MAPS SALAMIS At end BATTLEFIELD OF PLATAEA INTRODUCTION THE following is a brief analysis of the contents of Books VIII and IX, based on the summary in Stein's edition : BOOK VIII Ch. 1-5. The Greek fleet at Artemisium ; question of command of Themistocles supreme ; bribery by the Euboeans. Ch. 6-14. Despatch of a Persian squadron to sail round Euboea, and its destruction by a storm. Effect of the storm on the rest of the Persian fleet ; first encounter between the two fleets. Ch. 15-17. Second battle off Artemisium. Ch. 18-23. Retreat of the Greeks; Themistocles' to lonians attempt tamper with the ; Persian occupation of Euboea. Ch. 24-33. Visit of Persian sailors to the field of Thermopylae. Olympic festival (26). Feuds of Thessalians and Phocians Persian advance ; through Phocis (27-33). Ch. 34-39. Persian march through Boeotia, and unsuccessful attempt upon Delphi. Ch. 40-48. Abandonment of Attica by the Athenians ; the Greek fleet at Salamis. Ch. 49-55. Greek council of war ; Persian invasion of Attica and occupation of Athens. vii INTRODUCTION Ch. 56-64. Greek design to withdraw the fleet to the Isthmus of Corinth. Decision to remain at Salamis, by Themistocles' advice. Ch. 65. Dicaeus' vision near Eleusis. Ch. 66-69. Persian fleet at Phalerum ; advice given by Artemisia in a council of war. Ch. 70-73. Greek fortification of the Isthmus. Digression on the various Peloponnesian nationalities. Ch. 74-82. Unwillingness of the Peloponnesians to remain at Salamis. Themistocles' design to com- them his to and Persian pel ; message Xerxes, movement to encircle the Greeks. Announcement of this by Aristides. Ch. 83-96. Battle of Salamis. Ch. 97-99. Xerxes' intention to retreat; news at Susa of the capture of Athens and the battle of Salamis. Ch. 100-102. Advice given to Xerxes by Mardonius and Artemisia. Ch. 103-106. Story of the revenge of Hermotimus. Ch. 107-110. Flight of Persian fleet, and Greek as far as Andros Themistocles' pursuit ; message to Xerxes. Ch. Ill, 112. Siege of Andros, and demands made by Themistocles on various islands. Ch. 113. Mardonius' selection of his army. Ch. 114-120. Incidents in Xerxes' retreat. Ch. 121-125. Greek division of spoil and assign- at ment of honours ; Themistocles' reception Sparta. Ch. 126-129. Artabazus' capture of Olynthus and siege of Potidaea, during the winter. Ch. 130-132. Greek and Persian fleets at Aegina and Samos respectively (spring of 479). Leutychides' command. Message to the Greeks from the lonians. viii INTRODUCTION Ch. 133-135. Mardonius' consultation of Greek oracles. Ch. 136-139. Mission to Athens of Alexander of of his Macedonia ; origin dynasty. Ch. 140-144. Speeches at Athens of Alexander Athenian answer to both. and the Spartan envoys ; BOOK IX in Attica his fresh Ch. 1-5. Mardonius ; proposals to the Athenians. Ch. 611. Hesitation of the Spartans to send made the Athenians eventual troops ; appeals by ; despatch of a force. Ch. 1215. Argive warning to Mardonius; his march to Megara and withdrawal thence to Boeotia. Ch. 16-18. Story of a banquet at Thebes, and Mardonius' test of a Phocian contingent. at of Ch. 19-25. The Greeks Erythrae ; repulse and death of its leader Persian cavalry attack, ; Greek change of position. Ch. 26-27. Rival claim of Tegeans and Athenians for the post of honour. Ch. 28-32. Battle array of Greek and Persian armies. Ch. 33-37. Stories of the diviners in the two armies. Persian attack on a Greek Ch. 38-43. convoy ; Mardonius' council of war and determination to fight. to the Athenians Ch. 44-51. Alexander's warning ; of Greek and Persian formation attempted change ; Mardonius' challenge to the Spartans, and retreat of Greeks to a new position. ix INTRODUCTION Ch. of the 52-57. Flight Greek centre ; Amom- pharetus' refusal to change his ground. Ch. 58-65. Battle of Plataea ; initial success of Spartans and Tegeans. Ch. of success 66-69. Flight Artabazus ; Athenian the Boeotians disaster to of against ; part the Greek army. Ch. 70-75. Assault and capture of the Persian fortified camp. Distinctions of various Greek fighters. Ch. 76-79. Pausanias' reception of the Coan female the Mantineans and Eleans after suppliant ; the battle to Pausanias and ; Lampon's proposal his reply. Ch. 80-85. Greek division of the spoil and burial of the dead. Ch. 86-89. Siege of Thebes and punishment of Theban leaders ; retreat of Artabazus. Ch. 90-95. Envoys from Samos with the Greek fleet. Story of the diviner Euenius. Ch. 96105. Movements preliminary to the battle of Mycale, and Greek victory there. Ch. 106, 107. Greek deliberation at Samos ; quarrel between Persian leaders. Ch. 108-113. Story of Xerxes' adultery and cruelty, and the fate of his brother Masistes. Ch. 114-121. Capture of Sestus by the Greeks; sacrilege of Artayctes, and his execution. Ch. 122. Cyrus' advice to the Persians to prefer hardship to comfort. In the eighth and ninth books the central subjects are the battles of Salamis and Plataea respectively. Herodotus describes the preliminaries of Salamis, INTRODUCTION and both the operations prior to Plataea and the actual battle, with much detail ; and his narrative has given rise to a good deal of controversy. Some- times it is dillicult to reconcile his story with the facts of geography. Sometimes, it is alleged, he is contradicted by the only other real authority for the sea flight at Salamis, Aeschylus. More often, he is said to sin against the laws of probability. He makes generals and armies do things which are and this is to detract from his surprising ; alleged for a who allows and credit ; historian, generals armies to disregard known rules of war, is plainly if not suspect, and at best the dupe of camp gossip, animated by partiality or even malice. As to the battle of Salamis, a mere translator has no desire to add greatly to the literature of contro- to review Herodotus' versy. But it is worth while account. On the day before the battle, the Persian coast of its fleet, apparently, lay along the Attica, near the Greeks eastern wing being Munychia ; being at Salamis, opposite to and rather less than a mile distant from Xerxes' ships. During the night, Persian ships were detached to close the two entrances of the straits between the mainland and Salamis. At dawn, of the following day, the Greeks rowed out and made a frontal attack on the Persians facing them. This account is questioned by the learned, mainly because is the on two grounds ; firstly, (it alleged) Persians, if they originally lay along the Attic coast, could not have closed the two entrances of the of the Greeks straits without the knowledge ; from secondly, because Herodotus' narrative differs that given by Aeschylus, in the Persae, a play xi INTRODUCTION produced only eight years after the battle. As to the first objection, the Persian manoeuvre was executed in darkness, and by small vessels, not modern battleships : it is surely not incredible that the Greeks should have been unaware of its full execution. As to the second ground of criticism, that Herodotus and Aeschylus do not agree, and that Aeschylus must be held the better authority, it still remains to be shown in what the alleged discrepancy consists.
Recommended publications
  • Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study

    Kretan Cult and Customs, Especially in the Classical and Hellenistic Periods: a Religious, Social, and Political Study

    i Kretan cult and customs, especially in the Classical and Hellenistic periods: a religious, social, and political study Thesis submitted for degree of MPhil Carolyn Schofield University College London ii Declaration I, Carolyn Schofield, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been acknowledged in the thesis. iii Abstract Ancient Krete perceived itself, and was perceived from outside, as rather different from the rest of Greece, particularly with respect to religion, social structure, and laws. The purpose of the thesis is to explore the bases for these perceptions and their accuracy. Krete’s self-perception is examined in the light of the account of Diodoros Siculus (Book 5, 64-80, allegedly based on Kretan sources), backed up by inscriptions and archaeology, while outside perceptions are derived mainly from other literary sources, including, inter alia, Homer, Strabo, Plato and Aristotle, Herodotos and Polybios; in both cases making reference also to the fragments and testimonia of ancient historians of Krete. While the main cult-epithets of Zeus on Krete – Diktaios, associated with pre-Greek inhabitants of eastern Krete, Idatas, associated with Dorian settlers, and Kretagenes, the symbol of the Hellenistic koinon - are almost unique to the island, those of Apollo are not, but there is good reason to believe that both Delphinios and Pythios originated on Krete, and evidence too that the Eleusinian Mysteries and Orphic and Dionysiac rites had much in common with early Kretan practice. The early institutionalization of pederasty, and the abduction of boys described by Ephoros, are unique to Krete, but the latter is distinct from rites of initiation to manhood, which continued later on Krete than elsewhere, and were associated with different gods.
  • Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League

    Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League

    DEMETRIUSPOLIORCETES AND THE HELLENIC LEAGUE (PLATE 33) 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND D JURING the six years, 307/6-302/1 B.C., issues were raised and settled which shaped the course of western history for a long time to come. The epoch was alike critical for Athens, Hellas, and the Macedonians. The Macedonians faced squarely during this period the decision whether their world was to be one world or an aggregate of separate kingdoms with conflicting interests, and ill-defined boundaries, preserved by a precarious balance of power and incapable of common action against uprisings of Greek and oriental subjects and the plundering appetites of surrounding barbarians. The champion of unity was King Antigonus the One- Eyed, and his chief lieutenant his brilliant but unstatesmanlike son, King Demetrius the Taker of Cities, a master of siege operations and of naval construction and tactics, more skilled in organizing the land-instruments of warfare than in using them on the battle field. The final campaign between the champions of Macedonian unity and disunity opened in 307 with the liberation of Athens by Demetrius and ended in 301 B.C. with the Battle of the Kings, when Antigonus died in a hail of javelins and Demetrius' cavalry failed to penetrate a corps of 500 Indian elephants in a vain effort to rescue hinm. Of his four adversaries King Lysimachus and King Kassander left no successors; the other two, Kings Ptolemy of Egypt and Seleucus of Syria, were more fortunate, and they and Demetrius' able son, Antigonus Gonatas, planted the three dynasties with whom the Romans dealt and whom they successively destroyed in wars spread over 44 years.
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography

    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
  • Sons and Fathers in the Catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233

    Sons and Fathers in the Catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233

    Sons and fathers in the catalogue of Argonauts in Apollonius Argonautica 1.23-233 ANNETTE HARDER University of Groningen [email protected] 1. Generations of heroes The Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius brings emphatically to the attention of its readers the distinction between the generation of the Argonauts and the heroes of the Trojan War in the next genera- tion. Apollonius initially highlights this emphasis in the episode of the Argonauts’ departure, when the baby Achilles is watching them, at AR 1.557-5581 σὺν καί οἱ (sc. Chiron) παράκοιτις ἐπωλένιον φορέουσα | Πηλείδην Ἀχιλῆα, φίλωι δειδίσκετο πατρί (“and with him his wife, hold- ing Peleus’ son Achilles in her arms, showed him to his dear father”)2; he does so again in 4.866-879, which describes Thetis and Achilles as a baby. Accordingly, several scholars have focused on the ways in which 1 — On this marker of the generations see also Klooster 2014, 527. 2 — All translations of Apollonius are by Race 2008. EuGeStA - n°9 - 2019 2 ANNETTE HARDER Apollonius has avoided anachronisms by carefully distinguishing between the Argonauts and the heroes of the Trojan War3. More specifically Jacqueline Klooster (2014, 521-530), in discussing the treatment of time in the Argonautica, distinguishes four periods of time to which Apollonius refers: first, the time before the Argo sailed, from the beginning of the cosmos (featured in the song of Orpheus in AR 1.496-511); second, the time of its sailing (i.e. the time of the epic’s setting); third, the past after the Argo sailed and fourth the present inhab- ited by the narrator (both hinted at by numerous allusions and aitia).
  • Daily Devotion Philippians

    Daily Devotion Philippians

    Daily Devotion reading, thinking, & praying through Philippians an Ipswich International Church publication Paul in Philippi From [Neapolis] we reached Philippi, a major city of that district of Macedonia and a Roman colony. And we stayed there several days. [Acts 16:12 (NLT)] Philippi was a town of Macedonia, in the territory of the Edones, on the confines of Thrace, and very near the northern extremity of the Aegean Sea. It was a little eastward of Mount Pangaeus, and about midway between Nicopolis on the east, and Thessalonica on the west. It was at first called Crenides, and afterwards Datus; but Philip, king of Macedonia and father of Alexander, having taken possession of it and fortified it, called it Philippi, after his own name. Julius Caesar planted a colony here, which was afterwards enlarged by Augustus; and hence the inhabitants were considered as freemen of Rome.1 The Gospel was preached first here by St. Paul. He had a vision in the night; a man of Macedonia appeared to him and said, “Come over to Macedonia and help us.” He was then at Troas in Mysia; from there he immediately sailed to Samothracia, came the next day to Neapolis, and thence to Philippi. There he continued for some time, and converted Lydia, a seller of purple, from Thyatira; and afterwards cast a demon out of a slave girl, for which he and Silas were persecuted, cast into prison, scourged, and put into the stocks: but the magistrates afterwards finding that they were Romans, took them out of prison and treated them civilly.
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    9781405129992_6_ind.qxd 16/06/2009 12:11 Page 203 Index Acanthus, 130 Aetolian League, 162, 163, 166, Acarnanians, 137 178, 179 Achaea/Achaean(s), 31–2, 79, 123, Agamemnon, 51 160, 177 Agasicles (king of Sparta), 95 Achaean League: Agis IV and, agathoergoi, 174 166; as ally of Rome, 178–9; Age grades: see names of individual Cleomenes III and, 175; invasion grades of Laconia by, 177; Nabis and, Agesilaus (ephor), 166 178; as protector of perioecic Agesilaus II (king of Sparta), cities, 179; Sparta’s membership 135–47; at battle of Mantinea in, 15, 111, 179, 181–2 (362 B.C.E.), 146; campaign of, in Achaean War, 182 Asia Minor, 132–3, 136; capture acropolis, 130, 187–8, 192, 193, of Phlius by, 138; citizen training 194; see also Athena Chalcioecus, system and, 135; conspiracies sanctuary of after battle of Leuctra and, 144–5, Acrotatus (king of Sparta), 163, 158; conspiracy of Cinadon 164 and, 135–6; death of, 147; Acrotatus, 161 Epaminondas and, 142–3; Actium, battle of, 184 execution of women by, 168; Aegaleus, Mount, 65 foreign policy of, 132, 139–40, Aegiae (Laconian), 91 146–7; gift of, 101; helots and, Aegimius, 22 84; in Boeotia, 141; in Thessaly, Aegina (island)/Aeginetans: Delian 136; influence of, at Sparta, 142; League and,COPYRIGHTED 117; Lysander and, lameness MATERIAL of, 135; lance of, 189; 127, 129; pro-Persian party on, Life of, by Plutarch, 17; Lysander 59, 60; refugees from, 89 and, 12, 132–3; as mercenary, Aegospotami, battle of, 128, 130 146, 147; Phoebidas affair and, Aeimnestos, 69 102, 139; Spartan politics and, Aeolians,
  • Conflict in the Peloponnese

    Conflict in the Peloponnese

    CONFLICT IN THE PELOPONNESE Social, Military and Intellectual Proceedings of the 2nd CSPS PG and Early Career Conference, University of Nottingham 22-24 March 2013 edited by Vasiliki BROUMA Kendell HEYDON CSPS Online Publications 4 2018 Published by the Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies (CSPS), School of Humanities, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. © Centre for Spartan and Peloponnesian Studies and individual authors ISBN 978-0-9576620-2-5 This work is ‘Open Access’, published under a creative commons license which means that you are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work as long as you clearly attribute the work to the authors, that you do not use this work for any commercial gain in any form and that you in no way alter, transform or build on the work outside of its use in normal academic scholarship without express permission of the authors and the publisher of this volume. Furthermore, for any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/csps TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. i THE FAMILY AS THE INTERNAL ENEMY OF THE SPARTAN STATE ........................................ 1-23 Maciej Daszuta COMMEMORATING THE WAR DEAD IN ANCIENT SPARTA THE GYMNOPAIDIAI AND THE BATTLE OF HYSIAI .............................................................. 24-39 Elena Franchi PHILOTIMIA AND PHILONIKIA AT SPARTA ......................................................................... 40-69 Michele Lucchesi SLAVERY AS A POLITICAL PROBLEM DURING THE PELOPONESSIAN WARS ..................... 70-85 Bernat Montoya Rubio TYRTAEUS: THE SPARTAN POET FROM ATHENS SHIFTING IDENTITIES AS RHETORICAL STRATEGY IN LYCURGUS’ AGAINST LEOCRATES ................................................................................ 86-102 Eveline van Hilten-Rutten THE INFLUENCE OF THE KARNEIA ON WARFARE ..........................................................
  • Download Horace: the SATIRES, EPISTLES and ARS POETICA

    Download Horace: the SATIRES, EPISTLES and ARS POETICA

    +RUDFH 4XLQWXV+RUDWLXV)ODFFXV 7KH6DWLUHV(SLVWOHVDQG$UV3RHWLFD Translated by A. S. Kline ã2005 All Rights Reserved This work may be freely reproduced, stored, and transmitted, electronically or otherwise, for any non- commercial purpose. &RQWHQWV Satires: Book I Satire I - On Discontent............................11 BkISatI:1-22 Everyone is discontented with their lot .......11 BkISatI:23-60 All work to make themselves rich, but why? ..........................................................................................12 BkISatI:61-91 The miseries of the wealthy.......................13 BkISatI:92-121 Set a limit to your desire for riches..........14 Satires: Book I Satire II – On Extremism .........................16 BkISatII:1-22 When it comes to money men practise extremes............................................................................16 BkISatII:23-46 And in sexual matters some prefer adultery ..........................................................................................17 BkISatII:47-63 While others avoid wives like the plague.17 BkISatII:64-85 The sin’s the same, but wives are more trouble...............................................................................18 BkISatII:86-110 Wives present endless obstacles.............19 BkISatII:111-134 No married women for me!..................20 Satires: Book I Satire III – On Tolerance..........................22 BkISatIII:1-24 Tigellius the Singer’s faults......................22 BkISatIII:25-54 Where is our tolerance though? ..............23 BkISatIII:55-75
  • Festival and Civic Plays from Greek and Roman Tales

    Festival and Civic Plays from Greek and Roman Tales

    FESTIVAL ajd CIVIC PLAYS /rom GREEK ROMAN TALES HOFER f • JJ .'*1' Class PMkJID JT Rook. -A >/ H bb ) COPmiGifT DEPOSm Bronze Head of Ephebos This beautiful bronze head of the Ephebos (Greek youth attaining majority) is the one selected by Gardiner as typical of the Greek ideal defined by the untranslatable word aidos, which includes the qualities of modesty, reverence, courage, courtesy and honor. EDUCATIONAL PLAY-BOOK SERIES FESTIVAL AND CIVIC PLAYS FROM GREEK AND ROMAN TALES BY MARI RUEF HOFER Author of Eecreation Boohs for Schools and Playgrounds Our life's a stage, a playground; learn to play And take naught too seriously; or bear its troubles. —Palladas BECKLEY-CARDY COMPANY CHICAGO 3 PH U It-o . Ps p(=(> Copyright, 1926, by BECKLEY-CARDY COMPANY \LL RIGHTS RESERVED .: 1 • 30 1926 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ©C1A957872 'WO I FOREWORD Greek myth, which began its career in the inspired song of the bards, still holds our interest and remains an unsurpassed medium for imaginative adventuring. It satisfies wonder hunger and youthful ideality; is true to nature and human experience, and fully stands the test of modem literalism. Centuries ago Straho called attention to the geo¬ graphical turn of Homer. He said that the only diffi¬ culty lay in ‘ ^ culling out the actual rocks and whirlpools from the Scylla and Charybdis of his poetry.^’ This view clears away much of the old obscurity without robbing us of the picturesque. Greek myth abounds in travel tales, featuring the astonishing and unexpected. Yet the most improbable experiences of the Argonauts are not staggering to our mechanical and project-minded age.
  • Philip II of Macedon: a Consideration of Books VII IX of Justin's Epitome of Pompeius Trogus

    Philip II of Macedon: a Consideration of Books VII IX of Justin's Epitome of Pompeius Trogus

    Durham E-Theses Philip II of Macedon: a consideration of books VII IX of Justin's epitome of Pompeius Trogus Wade, J. S. How to cite: Wade, J. S. (1977) Philip II of Macedon: a consideration of books VII IX of Justin's epitome of Pompeius Trogus, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10215/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. PHILIP II OF MACEDON: A CONSIDERATION OF BOOKS VII - IX OF JUSTIN* S EPITOME OF POMPEIUS TROGUS THESIS SUBMITTED IN APPLICATION FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS - by - J. S. WADE, B. A. DEPARTMENT OF CLASSICS UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM OCTOBER 1977 ABSTRACT The aim of this dissertation is two-fold: firstly to examine the career and character of Philip II of Macedon as portrayed in Books VII - IX of Justin's epitome of the Historiae Phillppicae .of Pompeius Trqgus, and to consider to what extent Justin-Trogus (a composite name for the author of the views in the text of Justin) furnishes accurate historical fact, and to what extent he paints a one-sided interpretation of the events, and secondly to identify as far as possible Justin's principles of selection and compression as evidenced in Books VII - IX.