DOCSLIB.ORG

Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’S Oil Sector WATCH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’S Oil Sector WATCH HUMAN RIGHTS Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector WATCH Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector Copyright © 2012 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-937-2 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. We investigate and expose human rights violations and hold abusers accountable. We challenge governments and those who hold power to end abusive practices and respect international human rights law. We enlist the public and the international community to support the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org SEPTEMBER 2012 ISBN: 1-56432-937-2 Striking Oil, Striking Workers Violations of Labor Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Ersai Caspian Contractor LLC ................................................................................................... 5 KarazhanbasMunai JSC ........................................................................................................... 6 OzenMunaiGas ....................................................................................................................... 7 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................... 11 To the Government of Kazakhstan ........................................................................................... 11 On the right to freedom of association .............................................................................. 11 Enforcement of rights-respecting business conduct ......................................................... 12 Cooperation with international mechanisms .................................................................... 12 Effective inspections and investigations .......................................................................... 12 On the misuse of overbroad criminal laws ........................................................................ 13 To Kazakhstan’s International Partners, Including European Union Member States and the United States Government ...................................................................................................... 13 To the International Labour Organisation ............................................................................... 14 To National Companies and Foreign Companies Investing in Enterprises In Kazakhstan .......... 14 Methodology .................................................................................................................................... 16 I. Background ................................................................................................................................... 19 Oil and Gas: Backbone of Kazakhstan’s Economy .................................................................. 19 Oil Companies in Kazakhstan ................................................................................................ 22 Corporate Responsibility ....................................................................................................... 23 Kazakhstan’s Labor Movement .............................................................................................. 26 II. Freedom of Association under International and Kazakh Law ........................................................ 31 International Labor Standards ............................................................................................... 32 Prohibition on Employers’ Interference with Freedom of Association ................................ 33 Kazakhstan Labor Law ........................................................................................................... 34 Protection and Redress ................................................................................................... 35 Restrictions on Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining .................................... 35 Freedom of Association ................................................................................................... 36 Collective Bargaining ...................................................................................................... 37 Restrictions on the Right to Strike .................................................................................... 38 Consequences for Participating in an Illegal Strike ........................................................... 41 III. Violations of Freedom of Association and other Rights in Kazakhstan’s Oil Sector ..................... 43 Interference with Union Activity and Strike at KarazhanbasMunai Oil Company ....................... 43 Failed Efforts at Mediation .............................................................................................. 44 Violent Attack on Union Members .................................................................................... 46 Interference in the Election of a New Union Leader ........................................................... 47 Escalation of Tensions and the Initiation of the Strike ...................................................... 49 Strike and Its Aftermath .................................................................................................. 50 Violations of the Right to a Fair Hearing in Cases against Oil Workers ................................ 51 May 24 Attempt to Access Union Office ............................................................................ 54 June 5 Protest March ....................................................................................................... 55 Case of Natalia Sokolova ................................................................................................ 58 Threats against and Harassment of Karazhanbas Union Members .................................... 60 Wage Dispute and Strike at OzenMunaiGas Oil Company ....................................................... 61 Wage Dispute between Workers and OzenMunaiGas Management ................................... 62 Strike and Immediate Repercussions ............................................................................... 64 Riot Police Violently Disperse Peaceful Strikers ................................................................ 66 Case of Akzhanat Aminov ................................................................................................ 69 Threats, Harassment, and Violence against Oil Workers and Their Families ...................... 70 Interference in Union Activity and Strike at Ersai Caspian Contractor ....................................... 75 Ersai Caspian Contractor Restricts Karakiya Union Chairman’s Access to Workers ............. 76 Karakiya Union Sues Ersai Caspian Contractor for Unlawful Interference ........................... 77 Ersai Caspian Contractor Restricts Union Activities, Refuses to Negotiations .................... 79 Threats and Harassment of Karakiya Union Members ....................................................... 80 Another Attempt to Enter into Mediation with Ersai Caspian Contractor Management ....... 83 Workers Go on Strike ...................................................................................................... 84 Strike Committee Members Arrested, Karakiya Union Suspended ..................................... 86 Other Attempts to Disrupt the Peaceful Strike .................................................................. 88 Mass Dismissals at OzenMunaiGas, Ersai Caspian Contractor, and KarazhanbasMunai and Its Affiliate Companies ............................................................................................................... 90 Ersai Caspian Contractor and OzenMunaiGas Claims regarding Mass Dismissals .............. 94 Violations of Freedom of Assembly of those Supporting the Oil Workers ................................. 95 Detention of Opposition Activists in Zhanaozen ............................................................... 95 Detention and Beating of Bakyt B. ................................................................................... 96 Detention of Activist Galym Ageleuov .............................................................................. 97 Detention of Opposition Party Activists in Aktau .............................................................. 98 IV. Strike Aftermath: Violent Clashes and Politically-Motivated Arrests ........................................... 99 December 16 Zhanaozen Violence ......................................................................................... 99 Crackdown on Outspoken Oil Workers and Political Opposition Activists ............................... 101 V. The Role of Ersai Caspian Contractor, KarazhanbasMunai and OzenMunaiGas ........................... 105 Public
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PIMS 4855 TE REPORT.Pdf
    Terminal Evaluation Report UNDP-GEF Project: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP Project ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Areas (GEF-5): Biodiversity Land Degradation GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Executing Agencies: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Date Version 31 July 2018 01 First draft 30 September 02 Final Terminal Evaluation Report 2018 Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity-compatible livelihoods in and around PAs UNDP PIMS ID: 4855; GEF Project ID: 4584 Opening Page PROJECT DETAILS: Project Name: Improving sustainability of the PA system in desert ecosystems through promotion of biodiversity- compatible livelihoods in and around PAs Project ID: GEF Project ID: 4584 UNDP PIMS ID: 4855 Country: Kazakhstan Region: Europe and Central Asia Focal Area: Biodiversity Funding Source: GEF Trust Fund Strategic Programs: GEF-5 Biodiversity Strategy, Objective 1: Improve Sustainability of Protected Area Systems GEF-5 Land Degradation Strategy, Objective 3: Integrated Landscapes: Reduce Pressures on natural resources from competing land uses in wider landscape GEF Agency: United Nations Development Programme Implementation Modality: National Implementation Modality (NIM) Executing Agency: Forestry and Wildlife Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture Responsible Partners:
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereign Wealth Fund Response
    The International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds (IFSWF) is a voluntary organisation of sovereign wealth funds. It is committed to working together and strengthening its activities through dialogue, research and self-assessment. IFSWF was formed in 2009 by a group of state-owned international investors from around the world. The Forum’s aim is to maintain an open and stable investment climate by setting and following a set of principles and practices, known as the Santiago Principles, which address issues around institutional governance and risk management. Today, helping members implement the Santiago Principles remains the foundation of the IFSWF’s activity. IFSWF represents sovereign wealth funds from all corners of the globe, with a variety of mandates and at various stages of development. As a result, the Forum’s focus has evolved. In addition to encouraging ongoing commitment to the Santiago Principles, the Forum undertakes research, peer assistance and holds workshops and seminars to help members enhance their investment capabilities. MEMBERS Angola Australia Azerbaijan Fundo Soberano de Angola Future Fund State Oil Fund of the Republic of Azerbaijan Botswana Canada Chile The Pula Fund Alberta Heritage Savings Economic and Social Stabilization, Trust Fund and Pension Reserve Funds China Iran Ireland China Investment Corporation National Development Fund Ireland Strategic Investment of Iran Fund Italy Kazakhstan Kazakhstan CDP Equity SpA JSC Samruk-Kazyna JSC National Investment Corporation of the National Bank of Kazakhstan Korea
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Study on the Penetration Effect of Shotgun Pellet on Soap Ma Yongzhong Engineering University of Armed Police Force, Xi,An 710086, China [email protected]
    2019 9th International Conference on Education and Social Science (ICESS 2019) Experimental Study on the Penetration Effect of Shotgun Pellet on Soap Ma Yongzhong Engineering University of Armed Police Force, Xi,an 710086, China [email protected] Keyword: Grape-shot; Penetration power; Terminal effect Abstract. In order to make the shotgun play an effective role in maintaining stability, it is necessary to study the shotgun penetration effect systematically and scientifically. Based on the analysis of the mechanism of action of kinetic energy projectiles on human targets, the end effect experiments of different shot distances were carried out by establishing the shooting platform of shotgun and selecting soap to simulate the body tissues. The results show that within the effective range of 10m, the non-lethal strike effect of BB ammunition is the most ideal, which is helpful for the scientific use and optimization of this kind of anti-riot kinetic energy weapons and ammunition. Introduction In recent years, as a non-lethal anti-riot weapon, shotgun has played an important role in urban anti-terrorism and stabilization. At present, most of the armed police force is using military grapeshot, non-lethal effect is poor, can not achieve good dispersal effect without causing lethal damage to the population. Therefore, it is necessary to study the types and power of shrapnel. In this paper, through the establishment of a shooting platform for shotgun, soap is selected to simulate the body tissues, and the end effect experiments of different shotgun at different shooting distances are carried out, which provides a scientific basis for the scientific use and optimization of such anti-riot kinetic energy weapons and ammunition in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Less Than Lethal Weapons
    PUBLIC ORDER MANAGEMENT Less Than Lethal Weapons UN Peacekeeping PDT Standards for Formed Police Units 1st edition 2015 Public Order Management 1 Less Than Lethal Weapons Background Before the inception of UN Peacekeeping mission, the Department of Peacekeeping Operations requests TCC/PCC to contribute with their forces to the strength of the mission. The UN Police component is composed by Individual Police Officers (IPO) and Formed Police Units (FPU). The deployment of FPU is subject to a Memorandum of Understanding between the UN and the contributing country and the compliance with the force requirements of the mission. The force requirement lists the equipment and the weapons that the FPU has to deploy with. Despite the fact ‘Guidelines on the Use of Force by Law Enforcement Agencies’ recommends the development and the deployment of less than lethal weapons and ammunitions, FPUs usually do not possess this type of equipment. Until the development of less-lethal weapons, police officers around the world had few if any less-lethal options for riot control. Common tactics used by police that were intended to be non-lethal or less than lethal included a slowly advancing wall of men with batons. Considering the tasks the FPUs are demanded to carry out, those weapons should be mandatory as part of their equipment. The more equipped with these weapons FPUs are, the more they will be able to efficiently respond to the different type of threats and situation. Non-lethal weapons, also called less-lethal weapons, less-than-lethal weapons, non- deadly weapons, compliance weapons, or pain-inducing weapons are weapons intended to be used in the scale of Use of Force before using any lethal weapon.
    [Show full text]
  • Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: a Comparison
    WELFARE REFORMS IN POST-SOVIET STATES: A COMPARISON OF SOCIAL BENEFITS REFORM IN RUSSIA AND KAZAKHSTAN by ELENA MALTSEVA A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Elena Maltseva (2012) Welfare Reforms in Post-Soviet States: A Comparison of Social Benefits Reform in Russia and Kazakhstan Elena Maltseva Doctor of Philosophy Political Science University of Toronto (2012) Abstract: Concerned with the question of why governments display varying degrees of success in implementing social reforms, (judged by their ability to arrive at coherent policy outcomes), my dissertation aims to identify the most important factors responsible for the stagnation of social benefits reform in Russia, as opposed to its successful implementation in Kazakhstan. Given their comparable Soviet political and economic characteristics in the immediate aftermath of Communism’s disintegration, why did the implementation of social benefits reform succeed in Kazakhstan, but largely fail in Russia? I argue that although several political and institutional factors did, to a certain degree, influence the course of social benefits reform in these two countries, their success or failure was ultimately determined by the capacity of key state actors to frame the problem and form an effective policy coalition that could further the reform agenda despite various political and institutional obstacles and socioeconomic challenges. In the case of Kazakhstan, the successful implementation of the social benefits reform was a result of a bold and skillful endeavour by Kazakhstani authorities, who used the existing conditions to justify the reform initiative and achieve the reform’s original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Burglary Ring Cracked Kennedy Vs. Carter...The Battle Is Joined
    Eviction notice tacked on door of frat house Arson suspected By ROBIN GOLDSTEIN not be reached for comment last night, still isn't satisfied people have been busy with hammers and saws making in 2 fires today. LONG BRANCH — The eviction notice nailed to the that the building is safe. repairs." door of the Delta Sigma Phi fraternity house by the city Eugene Iadanza, the West Long Branch attorney and By P AM ABOUZEID Some trees in front of the house were cut down to RED BANK- Police are investigating a fire marshal orders the premises vacated and shuttered former fraternity brother who is representing the provide easier access for firetrucks, and the fraternity rash of fires that may have been set by arsonists by Thursday beleaguered house tenants, said Delta Sigma Phi would brought in professional carpenters to repalce a meeting But the 16 brothers living there say they will fight to wait for the city to sign a complaint against the house and room ceiling which Williams considered hazardous in the past four days, including two early mom- ing blazes today at Prown's on Broad Street and stay in the house at 221 Cedar Ave. which for 20 years has then attempt to prove in a hearing that the house is a fit Other of Williams' recommendations, such as con- been toe scene of fraternity beer bashes, socials, and place to live. struction of a fire wall on the third floor, would cost a Welsh Farms on Front Street. meetings. "Km confident that, in a hearing, we'll be able to prohibitive amount to carry out, Fay added Patrolman Robert Scott discovered the first fire in a storage shed at the rear of Prown's at "This bouse is our life," declared fraternity presi- show that the house is safe and habitable," Iadanza said.
    [Show full text]
  • Próba Określenia Istoty I Kulturowego Znaczenia Profesjonalnego Wrestlingu1 Joanna
    Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 PL) Załącznik Kulturoznawczy 5/2018 aneKs „WspółcZeśni gladiatorZy” „WspółcZeśni gladiatorZy”. próBa oKreślenia istoty i KulturoWego ZnacZenia profesjonalnego Wrestlingu1 joanna joanna Biernacik Biernacik [email protected] Prolog – gladiaTorzY na pograniczu śWiaTÓW Fałszywy sport. Prostacki teatr. Udawanie bólu za wielkie pieniądze. Zapasy profesjonalne, potocznie zwane po prostu wrestlingiem, choć śledzone przez miliony osób na całym świecie, wciąż wzbudzają kontrowersje wśród przypadkowych odbiorców. Niniejszy artykuł stanowi próbę uchwycenia istoty i kulturowego znaczenia tego pozornie nieskomplikowanego sportu. Jak zauważa Dariusz Kosiński, widowiska sportowe często są lekceważone i marginalizowane jako potencjalny przedmiot badań, sprowadzane do roli czczej rozrywki i bezproduktywnej zabawy2. Przekonanie to wydaje się wypływać z ignorowania faktu, iż są one istotną częścią życia społecznego. Kosiński postrzega sport jako „najpełniejszą reprezentację współczesnej kultury światowej”3, stanowiącą „najpełniejszy, najbardziej precyzyjny w swojej złożoności metakomentarz dotyczący jej podstawowych wartości, znaczeń i sposobów działania”4. Dziedzinę, która zawiera w sobie złożoną płaszczyznę performatywną – co badacz ukazuje na przykładzie meczu piłki nożnej. Skoro Kosiński postuluje ustanowienie sportu jako dziedziny 1 Artykuł stanowi przeredagowaną wersję rozprawy magisterskiej napisanej pod kierunkiem prof. UKSW dr hab. Brygidy Pawłowskiej-Jądrzyk i obronionej na Wydziale Nauk Humanistycznych UKSW w 2017 roku. 2 D. Kosiński, Performatyka i dramatologia sportu. Próba przewrotki teore- tycznej, „Kultura Współczesna” 2017, nr 1, s. 15. 3 Ibidem, s. 16. 4 Ibidem. ▪ www.zalacznik.uksw.edu.pl 353 joanna BiernaciK centralnej dla badań z zakresu performatyki, warto zatem przyjrzeć się także profesjonalnemu wrestlingowi5 – dyscyplinie wciąż w Polsce mało znanej, jednakże wartej opisania, łączącej w sobie cechy zarówno widowisk sportowych, jak i teatralnego performansu.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of the Open Dialogue Foundation on the Working Session 9: Humanitarian Issues and Other Commitments, Including
    Statement of the Open Dialogue Foundation on the working session 9: Humanitarian issues and other commitments, including: combating trafficking in human beings, refugees and displaced persons, persons at risk of displacement Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, One of the fields of activity of the Open Dialogue Foundation is protection of political refugees and asylum seekers from undemocratic states. Very often political refugees from the post-Soviet countries are seeking asylum in Ukraine, whose authorities declare adherence to democratic values, but in reality cooperate with regimes in extradition issues. Political refugees often became victims of kidnapping and expulsion from Ukraine. Turkish citizens Salih Zeki Yigit and Yusuf Inan were kidnapped by Ukrainian Security Service and ​ expelled to Turkey in 2018. Ukrainian Migration Service systematically denies the granting of asylum or subsidiary protection to those persecuted. In December 2018 Ukrainian Migration Service had refused to grant refugee status to Kazakhstani opposition journalist Zhanara Akhmetova, despite the fact that the Supreme Court of Ukraine ordered the migration service to reconsider its first negative decision. Yesterday District Administrative Court of Kyiv had refused to oblige the Migration Service to grant asylum to Akhmetova. Since 2017 Akhmetova is under the threat of being extradite or expelled from Ukraine to Kazakhstan where she faces imprisonment and tortures. Russian political refugee Alexey Vetrov unsuccessfully trying to be granted refugee status in Ukraine since 2014. The Migration Service of Ukraine denied the granting of asylum, citing that ​ ​ ​ Russia is a ‘democratic state, governed by the rule of law’, where he won’t be facing any threats. The Open Dialogue Foundation urges the Ukrainian authorities, in particular the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights, to pay attention to the case of Zhanara Akhmetova, Ardak Ashym and other political refugees from Kazakhstan, Russia and other undemocratic states.
    [Show full text]
  • KAZAKHSTAN Human Rights Committee Briefing Paper - August 2015
    THE SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS KAZAKHSTAN Human Rights Committee Briefing Paper - August 2015 Kazakhstan has demonstrated some interest in improving its human rights policies, consulting with civil society on reform, fulfilling Human Rights Committee (Committee) recommendations,1 and engaging with the Dialogue Platform on Human Dimension together with the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Nevertheless, since the Committee’s Concluding Observations in 2011, the rights of human rights defenders (HRDs), civil society, journalists and the media in Kazakhstan guaranteed under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) continue to be eroded. HRDs consistently face physical and verbal threats, intimidation, judicial harassment, and arbitrary detention.2 Legislation enshrined over the past year has entrenched pre-existing, and extended, limits on freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly and religion, including disproportionate sanctions contrary to the ICCPR.3 The Committee, the European Union (EU), OSCE, various UN Special Rapporteurs, and civil society groups have all expressed concern about these regressions. RISKS TO HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS OFFICIAL RESTRICTIONS on the space for human rights defenders • Kazakhstan is characterised by the use of State legislation and apparatus to severely restrict Freedom of Opinion and Expression freedom of expression and assembly as well as human rights monitoring and promotion. • The Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief
    [Show full text]
  • 43439-033: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections
    Social Monitoring Report Project Number: 43439-033 July 2020 KAZ: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Section) Investment Program – Tranche 2 Prepared by the "SNS-2017" LLP for the Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development, Republic of Kazakhstan and the Asian Development Bank. This bi-annual social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status or any territory or area. 5th BIANNUAL REPORT ON SOCIAL SAFEGUARD MEASURES Internal Monitoring Loan: 2967-KAZ Project of reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen– Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73 Report on Social Safeguard Measures. Internal Monitoring. Project of Reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen–Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73. 5th Bi-annual Report. Prepared by: Consultant for Supervision Construction "SNS-2017" LLP (Kazakhstan) For: - Committee for Roads, Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development of RK - Asian Development Bank; - Project Management Consultant: “Renardet S.A.” Report period: January-June 2020 1 Report on Social Safeguard Measures. Internal Monitoring. Project of Reconstruction of the highway "Zhetybay–Zhanaozen–Kenderli–Turkmenistan Border" (to Turkmenbashy) section km 0–73.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in Kazakhstan
    UNECE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan - Needs Needs Assessment Assessment Information Service United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Palais des Nations UNITED NA CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Telephone: +41(0)22 917 44 44 Fax: +41(0)22 917 05 05 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unece.org TIONS Printed at United Nations, Geneva GE.14-22004–May 2014–150 UNITED NATIONS ECE/TRADE/407 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan Needs Assessment United Nations New York and Geneva, 2014 2 Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan Needs Assessment Note The designation employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the ex- pression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. This study is issued in English and Russian. ECE/TRADE/407 Copyright © 2014 United Nations and International Trade Centre All rights reserved Foreword 3 Foreword The International Trade Center (ITC) and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) are pleased to present the needs assessment study of regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in the Republic of Kazakhstan. We would also like to express our appreciation to Kazakhstan’s Centre for Trade Policy Development under the Ministry of Economic Development, which cooperated with both ITC and UNECE in preparing the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report on the Implementation of the Grant ECE/GC/2017/11/025 “Improved Understanding of Key Water Management Issues by Mid-Level Government Officials”
    Progress Report on the implementation of the grant ECE/GC/2017/11/025 “Improved understanding of key water management issues by mid-level government officials” . Kazakh-German University 1 January – 31th of July, 2018 1 part (Aktau training) Narrative report prepared by the German-Kazakh University 1. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT Within the framework of the project 025 “Improved understanding of key water management issues by mid-level government officials”, German-Kazakh University was responsible to implement the following tasks under the grant ECE/GC/2017/11/025: • Organization of training for civil servants on Integrated Water Resources Management in collaboration with the State Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (State Academy) Aktau, Kazakhstan – April 9 – 11/2018 • Organization of training for civil servants on Integrated Water Resources Management in collaboration with the State Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan (State Academy) Almaty, Kazakhstan – May 28 – 30/2018 Below is the description of activities implemented under each of the above tasks. Task I: Organization of IWRM training for civil servants in Aktau Based on the previous grant ECE/GC/2017.07.013 the second training for government officials was organized in Mangystay region (Aktau city) in order to cover water professionals from the Southwest region of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The training was organized by the Kazakh-German University with the support of the UNECE and in partnership with the RK State Academy Mangystay branch. The training was organized for 30 participants including trainers and organizational staff. The target audience of the training was the mid-level government staff.
    [Show full text]