To: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 55 St

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

To: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 55 St To: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 55 St. Clair Avenue East, Suite 907 Toronto ON, M4T 1M2 Fax: 416-952-1573 From: Adolfo Aranda and Ludmila Aranda << personal information removed >> Emails: << personal information removed >> << personal information removed >> Telephone: << personal information removed >> Ref: Milton Logistics Hub Project Our concerns regarding what aspects of the environment may be affected by this project and what should be examined during the environmental assessment: We do not support the establishment of this project in this location. It is so close to The Greenbelt which is a permanently protected area of green space, farmland, forests, wetlands, and watersheds. The Greenbelt is part of the protected countryside of The Niagara Escarpment. There are not many such naturally beautiful places like Milton Mountain and Mount Nemo around the GTA. Why we have to add this ugly mammoth yard of rail tracks at the bottom of Mount Nemo? So much train and truck pollution will be added. The 401 highway is narrow and absolutely incapable of supporting the extra trucks to be added between Milton and Toronto. CN has been the victim of several scary derailments which scares many people off. Immense thanks for taking our concerns into consideration. Adolfo and Ludmila Aranda, Milton, ON June 19, 2015 [email protected] To Whom it May Concern, Re: Milton CN Intermodal I am currently living in Mississauga while my brand new First Home is being built. Exciting right? I was very excited when I initially bought my brand new town home by myself, proud of my independence and excited that I would be in an area of Milton that I truly loved. I enjoy driving down Britannia Road daily to my job, as a teacher in Halton, and passing by farms, cows, horses, old barns and seeing the escarpment in the distance. I was especially excited when I met with my lawyer and he told me the other side of Britannia was considered green space that could not be built on, perfect! A view of trees from my balcony. However, my excitement quickly faded to anger and outrage and I questioned why I bought my house. Why? Because of the news of CN building an Intermodal just down the street from my not yet built, brand new home. As a first time homebuyer, I’m sure you can imagine my frustration and sadness knowing that I’d now be surrounded by ugly noise pollution, air pollution, lights from the Intermodal on 24/7, and the sight, sounds and danger of 1200+ transport trucks passing by my house on the daily. I could not believe CN could allow this to be built in such an agricultural area and SO close to residential houses!! As an Educator, I know and understand how important CN Rail is to our Country and Economy. However, as an Educator I DO NOT understand how CN can think this location is okay. Literally being placed next to people’s houses and farms who have lived there for years, and being placed across the street from current and future residential is disgusting. To think of all of the families who will be outside playing breathing in the freshly polluted air, listening to the noise and dangers of transport trucks traveling through roads that are in NO WAY ready for the surplus of truck traffic that will be using them (ie. Britannia Rd. Bronte Rd., Tremaine) and the view I will have from my balcony of the Intermodal ‘light show’ day and night is so saddening. I write this to you to please hear my concerns; there is better land in Milton further away from the Escarpment, residential houses, schools, and farmland. The CN Intermodal MUST be moved to a different location, closer to the 401, in an industrial area where trucks can enter quickly without traveling on small one lane roads such as Britannia, Bronte, and Tremaine. What are my exact concerns? • Traffic increase: 1500+ additional trucks daily to START! • Water Pollution & Contamination • Health Impacts • Traffic Safety, how will our streets be safe with all of those trucks on them 24/7?! • Open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year • Safety concerns. CN says they are building bike trails. Who will want to ride these trails in the midst of all of the transport trucks? • Incompatible to current and future land zoning • Increase in train length • Delays at rail crossings • Road deterioration • Increase in taxes to support the additional cost for infrastructure development and repairs required due to intermodal terminal traffic • Health and safety implications due to unknown content of intermodal containers stored at yard and passing through • Noise, Light and Air Pollution so close to residential houses, farms, schools and the escarpment • Trucks idling at the yard or on the roads with diesel emissions: a Class One Carcinogen, known to increase cancer risks • The disturbance of noise to the residents of Milton will be detrimental to our health, peace and enjoyment of our homes and park areas. The Proposed CN Milton Logistic Hub Project is to be placed alongside thousands of new homes in Milton. This site will affect thousands of residents directly. • The disturbance of very bright lighting will be detrimental to the residents of Milton health. Light at night is known to affect sleep patterns of residents living near a highly lighted yard. The Proposed CN Milton Logistic Hub Project is to be placed alongside thousands of new homes in Milton. This site will affect thousands of residents directly. • The disturbance of very bright lighting will be very evident to the many varieties of birds that nest and stop on their migrations north and south at the pond just east of Tremaine Road. It is known that bright night light changes the breeding calls of birds in the area. CN has reported a Species at Risk on the Proposed Site. Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus), Eastern Meadowlark (Sturnella magna) and Barn Swallow. • According to Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting, Frogs have been found to inhibit their mating calls when they are exposed to excessive light at night, reducing their reproductive capacity. • According to Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting, the feeding behavior of bats also is altered by artificial light. Researchers have blamed light pollution for declines in populations of North American moths, almost all small rodents and carnivores. “We just now understand the nocturnality of many creatures,” says Chad Moore, Night Sky Program manager with the National Park Service. “Not protecting the night will destroy the habitat of many animals.” • Spawning fish, which swim from Indian Creek, across the creek under Tremaine Road, through the pond, then by stream across the proposed CN Terminal Site and continue across under First Line will be affected by CN’s plans to change the creek or completely cover the creek. This is unacceptable. • Water based life forms living along Indian Creek will be affected by CN’s plans to change the creek or completely cover the creek. This is unacceptable. • Emergency Preparedness: increase for safety times for emergency responders • Proximity to residential development: noise, lights, vibrations, safety concerns and air pollution • Increased traffic volume makes local roads less safe for everyone. These roads are already quite busy during rush hour full of cars with families. • View from the escarpment will change forever • Increased commuting time • Diminished quality of life • Possible loss of tourism in Milton • Decrease in property values. As a First Time Home Buyer this is extremely discouraging. • Preliminary construction of a 400 acre Intermodal Rail Terminal with potential for growth to ?.. I truly hope you take into consideration what the town of Milton is saying as one voice. Please, DO NOT allow this Intermodal to be built in this Residential and Agricultural location. Sincerely, Alessandra Travali From: Alison Griffiths To: Logistics Hub / Pole Logistique (CEAA/ACEE) Subject: comment on CN"s Milton"s intermodal proposal Date: May 28, 2015 1:13:26 PM To Whom It May Concern: While intermodal hubs are essential aspects of railway operations in Canada, I believe it is vital to locate them properly to avoid negative impact on the environment and nearby housing and schools. I am familiar with switching yards and logistics hubs across the country and all those I have viewed are largely located in industrial areas. Those that are not were pre-existing in some form and housing\park projects arrived later. The plans for the development of south Milton have been in place for years. While train tracks do bisect the planned development the noise will be mitigated by fencing, landscaping etc. However, the impact of the 400 acre intermodal terminal cannot be mitigated in any way to avoid affecting hundreds of homes, nearby schools and, equally important, the views and recreational pleasure from the surrounding escarpment lands. Noise, light and air pollution will be constant. Additionally, the sensitive Carolina forest lands adjacent to the terminal will be ruined. Nothing CN says will change this. If you examine CN's corporate culture of cost cutting in order to boost profits and shareholder value it is very clear that once the hub is constructed CN's promises to mitigate, clean and calm will wither. I am a CN shareholder and have vigorously demanded that CN develop far better good corporate citizenship. I also do not believe that there are no other appropriate lands for this development. When CN's plan was to develop an over 1,000 acre parcel for an intermodal facility in 2000, it was probably true that the railway did not own a parcel of that size near or in industrial lands.
Recommended publications
  • New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020
    New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 New Station Initial Business Case Milton-Trafalgar Final October 2020 Contents Introduction 1 The Case for Change 4 Investment Option 12 Strategic Case 18 Economic Case 31 Financial Case 37 Deliverability and Operations Case 41 Business Case Summary 45 iv Executive Summary Introduction The Town of Milton in association with a landowner’s group (the Proponent) approached Metrolinx to assess the opportunity to develop a new GO rail station on the south side of the Milton Corridor, west of Trafalgar Road. This market-driven initiative assumes the proposed station would be planned and paid for by the private sector. Once built, the station would be transferred to Metrolinx who would own and operate it. The proposed station location is on undeveloped land, at the heart of both the Trafalgar Corridor and Agerton Employment Secondary Plan Areas studied by the Town of Milton in 2017. As such, the project offers the Town of Milton the opportunity to realize an attractive and vibrant transit-oriented community that has the potential to benefit the entire region. Option for Analysis This Initial Business Case (IBC) assesses a single option for the proposed station. The opening-day concept plan includes one new side platform to the north of the corridor, with protection for a future second platform to the south. The site includes 1,000 parking spots, a passenger pick-up/drop-off area (40 wait spaces, 10 load spaces), bicycle parking (128 covered spaces, 64 secured spaces) and a bus loop including 11 sawtooth bus bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Ultimate Club 2015 Annual General Meeting
    Toronto Ultimate Club 2015 Annual General Meeting September 29, 2015 - 7:30pm - Monarch Park Stadium - Community Room, 1 Parkmount Road, Toronto, ON, M4J 0A5 Attendance: Gerald Feeney, Cory Lamothe, Erin McMahon, Carnaby Taylor, Thomas Meyer, Greg Schmidt, Mark Tran, Sue Holland, Matt Denton, Jim Lim, Padraic Ryan, Kevin Philip Lee, RT LeChow, Tracy Docheff, Alyne Azucena, Korina Gov, Karin Lethbridge, Alice Chung, Neil Duchen, Damian Horton, Andrew Fell, Kimberley Chau, Paul Buksner, Michael Kukucska Call to Order: 7:39pm Adjourned 9:11pm ____________________________________________________________________________ Constitution of the meeting Presented by President and Chair Gerald Feeney. Introduce Directors & TUC Leadership Gerald Feeney introduces current Executive, Board members and Executive Director of the Club. Presentation & Approval of 2014 AGM minutes Motion to approve the minutes of the 2014 AGM that took place June 21st, 2014. Moved By: Gerald Feeney Second By: Greg Schmidt Motion approved unanimously Report from the Board See 2015 AGM Board of Directors’ Report for full details. ● Executive Director, Jason Robinson, resigned in January 2015. The Club would like to thank Jason for all his hard work, dedication, efforts and accomplishments during his tenure as both General Manager and Executive Director. The Club welcomed new Executive Director, Paul Buksner, in March 2015 ● Board was approached by new provincial ultimate organization, Ontario Ultimate, to join as members. The TUC has joined and is optimistic this new group
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Needs
    Chapter 2 – Transportation Needs 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF BRANT STREET TO WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION 2.6.4. Sensitivity Analysis 2-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.7. Systems Planning – Summary of Findings 2-21 2. TRANSPORTATION NEEDS 2-1 2.1. Introduction 2-1 2.1.1. Background 2-1 2.1.2. Scope of Systems Planning 2-1 2.1.3. Study Corridor 2-1 2.1.4. Approach 2-2 2.1.5. Overview of the Chapter 2-2 2.2. Existing Conditions and Past Trends 2-2 2.2.1. Current Land Use 2-2 2.2.2. Transportation System 2-3 2.2.3. Historic Travel Trends 2-4 2.2.4. Current Demands and System Performance 2-5 2.3. Future Conditions 2-7 2.3.1. Land Use Changes 2-7 2.3.2. Transportation Network Changes 2-8 2.3.3. Changes in Travel Patterns 2-9 2.3.4. Future Demand and System Performance 2-10 2.4. Service Concept 2-13 2.4.1. Operating Characteristics 2-13 2.4.2. Conceptual Operating and Service Strategy 2-13 2.5. Vehicle Maintenance and Storage support 2-14 2.5.1. Facility Need 2-14 2.5.2. West Yard – Capacity Assessment 2-15 2.5.3. West Yard – Location 2-15 2.6. Transitway Ridership Forecasts 2-15 2.6.1. Strategic Forecasts 2-15 2.6.2. Station Evaluation 2-17 2.6.3. Revised Forecasts 2-18 DRAFT 2-0 . Update ridership forecasts to the 2041 horizon; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016
    Bolton Residential Expansion Study (BRES) and Successful Integration of Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) May 24, 2016 The purpose of this memorandum is to review the professional literature pertaining to the potential develop- ment of a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) in the Bolton Residential Expansion Study area, in response to the Region of Peel’s recent release of the Discussion Paper. The Discussion Paper includes the establishment of evaluation themes and criteria, which are based on provincial and regional polices, stakeholder and public comments. It should be noted that while the Discussion Paper and the Region’s development of criteria does not specifi- cally advocate for TOD, it is the intent of this memorandum to illustrate that TOD-centric planning will not only adequately address such criteria, but will also complement and enhance the Region’s planning principles, key points and/or themes found in stakeholder and public comments. In the following are research findings related to TOD generally, and specifically, theMetrolinx Mobility Hub Guidelines For The Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (September 2011) objectives. Additionally, following a review and assessment of the “Response to Comments Submitted on the Bolton Residential Expansion Study ROPA” submission prepared by SGL Planning & Design Inc. (March 15, 2016), this memorandum evaluates some of the key arguments and assumptions made in this submission relative to the TOD research findings. Planning for Transit-Oriented Developments TOD policy and programs can result in catalytic development that creates walkable, livable neighborhoods around transit providing economic, livability and equitable benefits. The body of research on TODs in the United States has shown that TODs are more likely to succeed when project planning takes place in conjunction with transit system expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • 923466Magazine1final
    www.globalvillagefestival.ca Global Village Festival 2015 Publisher: Silk Road Publishing Founder: Steve Moghadam General Manager: Elly Achack Production Manager: Bahareh Nouri Team: Mike Mahmoudian, Sheri Chahidi, Parviz Achak, Eva Okati, Alexander Fairlie Jennifer Berry, Tony Berry Phone: 416-500-0007 Email: offi[email protected] Web: www.GlobalVillageFestival.ca Front Cover Photo Credit: © Kone | Dreamstime.com - Toronto Skyline At Night Photo Contents 08 Greater Toronto Area 49 Recreation in Toronto 78 Toronto sports 11 History of Toronto 51 Transportation in Toronto 88 List of sports teams in Toronto 16 Municipal government of Toronto 56 Public transportation in Toronto 90 List of museums in Toronto 19 Geography of Toronto 58 Economy of Toronto 92 Hotels in Toronto 22 History of neighbourhoods in Toronto 61 Toronto Purchase 94 List of neighbourhoods in Toronto 26 Demographics of Toronto 62 Public services in Toronto 97 List of Toronto parks 31 Architecture of Toronto 63 Lake Ontario 99 List of shopping malls in Toronto 36 Culture in Toronto 67 York, Upper Canada 42 Tourism in Toronto 71 Sister cities of Toronto 45 Education in Toronto 73 Annual events in Toronto 48 Health in Toronto 74 Media in Toronto 3 www.globalvillagefestival.ca The Hon. Yonah Martin SENATE SÉNAT L’hon Yonah Martin CANADA August 2015 The Senate of Canada Le Sénat du Canada Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A4 K1A 0A4 August 8, 2015 Greetings from the Honourable Yonah Martin Greetings from Senator Victor Oh On behalf of the Senate of Canada, sincere greetings to all of the organizers and participants of the I am pleased to extend my warmest greetings to everyone attending the 2015 North York 2015 North York Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Exempt Sites
    APPENDIX A: EXEMPT SITES There are sites in Mississauga identified in Part 3 as Applewood Neighbourhood “exempt”. Exempt sites reflect unique circumstances that are not representative of the vision, direction and planning policies of the Plan, Exempt Site1 but nonetheless are recognized because they contain established land uses. Mississauga Official Plan will not be interpreted to prevent the use of any land or building on these sites for a purpose that is contrary to the Plan, if such uses or buildings lawfully existed on the date of the approval of the Plan. Generally such uses will be encouraged to relocate to lands appropriately designated. It is intended that “exempt sites” will be reviewed during the preparation of local area plans or other planning studies. Lands zoned to permit such uses or buildings are deemed to be in conformity with the provisions of the Plan. The lands identified as Exempt Site 1 are located at the northwest corner of Grand Forks Road and Bloor Street. Existing offices are permitted. Mississauga Official Plan Draft: March, 2010 Appendix A -1 Applewood Neighbourhood Clarkson Village Community Node (continued) Exempt Site 2 Exempt Site 1 The lands identified as Exempt Site 2 are located on The lands identified as Exempt Site 1 are located at the south side of Burnhamthorpe Road East, east of the northwest corner of Lakeshore Road West and Ponytrail Drive. An existing veterinary clinic is Clarkson Road. permitted. An existing motor vehicle service station and motor vehicle wash is permitted. 2- Appendix A Draft: March, 2010 Mississauga Official Plan Clarkson-Lorne Park Neighbourhood Exempt Site 1 Exempt Site 2 The lands identified as Exempt Site 1 are located at The lands identified as Exempt Site 2 are located on the southeast corner of South Sheridan Way and the west side of Clarkson Road North, south of Indian Grove.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cord Weekly (January 30, 1992)
    AWlLFRID lAURIER UNIVERSilY STUDENT PUBUCATION VOLUME XXXII, ISSUE 19 THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 1992 His name is Sheffield... Fisher Sheffield. IN FAT ITY \ ~· ""'~""':" - _ • , • \ I f f l II Did you ever see a dream walking7 He laughed cruelly. "She's that I snarled, ''I'm gonna amputate The Cord. His first major article, little whore who's always hang- your tongue! I'm gonna rip your "Savagery and Sorrow in ing around the weight room." intestines out through your bum!" Steeltown", did not have the ,.~ I froze. Everything went quiet, I growled, as I drove my fists into catharic value that he thought it '] C.lll and became very focussed. A his face and ribs, and he started to would: oh sure, the article helped cold fury flashed through me. My breath funny... him work out the nature of his hands slowly curled up into fists. As I drove the guy head-first new relationship with his best so I put my elbow in his back, "What did you just say?" I into the cereal shelf, I saw the friend, the wangely-named Dub- I've held a lot of different and dropped a 2 L can of tomato hissed. manager of the supermarket out Dub-Dub, and allowed him to )lbs in my lifetime, but I'd have paste on his foot. He was grinning. "I said, your of the comer of my eye: my ex- vent his sadness and anger 10 say that my favourite job was "Jerk. .. you got a problem?" he sister's a whore." boss had rounded up some of the towards the girl, the ever- as a stock boy at the Jones turned to me and asked.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississauga Transit, 2013-2016 Business Plan
    Mississauga Transit 2013-2016 Business Plan City of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada MORE THAN 3,650 BUS STOps. 3RD LARGesT MUNICIPAL TRANSIT SYSTEM IN ONTARIO. 93 TRANSIT ROUTes, 1.3 MILLION HOURS OF seRVICE. FULLY ACCessIBLE 458 BUS FLeeT. Table of Contents Existing Core Services ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Vision and Mission ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Service Delivery Model ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.0 Past Achievements .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 4.0 Current Service Levels ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 5.0 Opportunities and Challenges ............................................................................................................................................ 12 6.0 Looking Ahead ................................................................................................................................................................... 14 7.0 Engaging our Customers
    [Show full text]
  • SPORT-SCAN DAILY BRIEF NHL 10/30/18 Anaheim Ducks Dallas Stars 1112632 up Next for the Ducks: Vs
    SPORT-SCAN DAILY BRIEF NHL 10/30/18 Anaheim Ducks Dallas Stars 1112632 Up next for the Ducks: vs. Philadelphia 1112661 Mired in scoring slump, Stars Jamie Benn and Tyler 1112633 Ducks’ Josh Manson has a few ideas about cutting down Seguin could be split up in Montreal on opponents’ shots on goal 1112662 How Stars prospect Ty Dellandrea is holding up as the 1112634 How the Ducks finally showed signs of breaking their 18-year-old captain on a winless OHL team shooting slump in OT loss to Sharks 1112663 From murals to video games: Jason Spezza was childhood hero for many current teammates Arizona Coyotes 1112635 Coyotes have earned the right to feel optimistic about this Detroit Red Wings season 1112664 Why Detroit Red Wings rookie Michael Rasmussen could 1112636 For improved Coyotes, penalty kill and defense have been land bigger role critical 1112665 Red Wings to let Michael Rasmussen develop in NHL 1112637 ‘Inch by inch’: Lawson Crouse’s steady development 1112666 Red Wings believe NHL better for Michael Rasmussen's toward becoming an NHL mainstay development 1112667 Breaks finally go Red Wings' way during tough start to Boston Bruins season 1112638 Bruins coach Bruce Cassidy appreciates Red Sox Steve Pearce’s story line Los Angeles Kings 1112639 NHL partners with MGM for sports betting 1112669 What we learned from the Kings' 4-3 win over the Rangers 1112640 Bruins notebook: Torey Krug appears ready for game 1112670 Stevens: Kings forward Dustin Brown checks all boxes action 1112671 Dustin Brown’s successful return cools Kings’ 1112641
    [Show full text]
  • Download the PDF Version of This Issue
    AUGUST 2016 AUGUST CANADA’S SUPPLY MANAGEMENT MAGAZINE DON’T SIT BACK! Larry Berglund on the case for continuing education Managing RISK • Fleet Excellence WINNER • The rise of BIG DATA Global Sourcing PB2B_Aug2016_AMS.indd 1 2016-08-09 10:35 AM Workplace Studio Inspire productivity. When it comes to planning a workspace, Staples Business Advantage™ works side by side with your business on every step, from creating a custom design to furniture and fixture installation. With cubicles and nesting tables, modular storage and beyond, our dedicated furniture experts bring you nationwide solutions from over 250 top manufacturers. Plus, with our unmatched buying power, you always get competitive pricing. So you can keep your team moving every day. Get started today. Visit StaplesBusinessAdvantage.ca/Furniture or call 1.877.272.2121 to learn more. PB2B_Staples_August.inddPB2B_Aug2016_AMS.indd 21 2016-07-142016-08-08 2:341:00 PM Vol. 58, No. 4 • AUGUST 2016 Table of Contents Features 8 6 SUPPLIER RISK What’s shaping risk for global procurement? 8 GLOBAL SOURCING The challenges and advantages to sourcing overseas. 11 BIG DATA Here’s what to do with all that information. 13 THE 2016 SCMA NATIONAL CONFERENCE Managed services and the merits of electronic bidding. 14 14 NEVER STOP LEARNING SCMA names Larry Berglund as the 2016 Fellow. 32 PERSONAL PROTECTION EQUIPMENT Tips for buying PPE and other safety gear. Also inside 4 UP FRONT 32 5 BUSINESS FRONT 34 THE LAW Workplace Studio 16 33 Cover photo: Brice Ferré Connect With Us Online We encourage you to visit us online to stay in touch Inspire productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary 407 TRANSITWAY – WEST OF BRANT STREET TO WEST OF HURONTARIO STREET MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION TABLE OF CONTENTS E. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 E.1. Background E-1 E.1.1. 407 Transitway Background and Status E-1 E.1.2. Study Purpose and Objectives E-2 E.1.3. Study Area E-2 E.1.4. Transit Project Assessment Process E-2 E.1.5. Statutory Requirements E-8 E.2. Transportation Needs Assessment E-8 E.2.1. Route Structure Conceptual Operating and Service Strategy E-8 E.2.2. 407 Transitway Ridership Forecasts E-9 E.2.3. Vehicle Storage and Maintenance Needs Assessment E-10 E.3 Existing and Future Conditions E-10 E.4 Identification and Evaluation of Alternatives Process E-10 E.4.1 Corridor Assessment E-10 E.4.2 Evaluation of Station Alternatives E-10 E.4.3 Evaluation of Alignment Alternatives E-12 E.4.4 Evaluation of MSF Sites E-12 E.5. Final Project Description E-12 E.6. Impact Assessment, Mitigation, and Monitoring E-14 E.7. Implementation Strategy E-14 E.8. Consultation Process E-14 E.9. Commitments to Future Action E-15 E-0 E. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY parallel to the Lakeshore GO corridor that will connect the municipalities in this corridor. The Transitway will also integrate with north-south transit services by providing stations for quick and convenient E.1. Background transfers. MTO has received Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks (MECP) approval under the E.1.1. 407 Transitway Background and Status Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) Regulation for the sections located between Hurontario Street in Brampton and Brock Road in Pickering and has finalized the TPAP study from Brant Street to The complete planned 407 Transitway is a 150 km high-speed public transit facility on a separate right- Hurontario Street, which is presented in this EPR.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Public Consultation Records
    Appendix A Public Consultation Records TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Public Information Centre #1 Summary ..................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Notification ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 PIC Presentation Material ...................................................................................... 2 1.4 PIC #1 Comments .................................................................................................. 3 2. Public Information Centre #2 Summary ..................................................................... 6 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Event Format ......................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Summary of Feedback ........................................................................................... 7 2.4 Future Road Network ............................................................................................ 7 2.5 Future Transit Network .......................................................................................... 8 2.6 Active Transportation ............................................................................................ 8 2.7 Requests for Clarity and Information ...................................................................
    [Show full text]