DOCSLIB.ORG

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -2009 -404 -HCM ENV-2009-405-CE HEARING DATE: March 19, 2009 Location: 5610 York Blvd, 5625 Buchanan St. TIME: 10:00 AM Council Districts: 1 and 14 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Northeast Los Angeles 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: East Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Historic Highland Park 90012 Legal Description: Lot 8 and 17 of Block 15 of Grider and Hamilton’s Highland Park Tract PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the HIGHLAND PARK SAFEWAY STORE REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER: Schwab, Robert H and Louis H. Trust, Schwab, R Trust, H. Schwab Trust c/o R and L Properties 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2250 Los Angeles, CA 90024-3954 APPLICANT: Charles J. Fisher Highland Park Heritage Trust 140 South Avenue 57 Los Angeles, CA 90042 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Not declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________ Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: January, 2009 Historic-Cultural Monument Application ZIMAS Report 5610 York Boulevard CHC-2009-404-HCM Page 2 of 3 SUMMARY Built in 1967 and located in the Highland Park community, this two-story rectangular-planned commercial building exhibited character-defining features of the Late Modern style. Built as a supermarket, the subject building is set back from York Boulevard to allow for a parking lot. Symmetrically composed, the building features a front-facing reinforced concrete arched roof covered with rolled composition. A large arched beam forms the fascia at the base of the roof, extending beyond the side eaves. This roof structure forms the primary architectural feature of the subject building. The exterior walls are glass, aluminum, and steel flanked by stone covered wings with vertical banding. Large plate glass windows with off-center entrances bisected by a centrally located sign board compose the main façade. The back elevation of the subject building features the roof arch form with unadorned concrete walls. The interior features an open space with an undulating arched ceiling and exposed I-beams. Secondary structures on the subject property include a large pole sign. The proposed Highland Park Safeway Store historic monument was designed by the firm Novikoff Engineers and built by the Safeway Company. The Safeway market chain was established in 1914 in Southern California and quickly grew as a major supermarket chain throughout the state of California, eventually becoming the world’s largest chain of retail food stores. In 1967, the company opened a location at the subject site using one of their standardized prototypical designs, known as the “Marina Plan.” The “Marina Plan” was roughly a design scheme that consisted of a main central arch, high beamed ceiling, and a glass façade. This style was typical of their supermarket stores throughout California and the United States. The subject building was converted to a “Pic N Save” store sometime in the 1980s and later “Big Lots.” The subject building is currently vacant. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. FINDINGS The written nomination argues that the property meets two of the specified Historic-Cultural Monument criteria: 1) “embodies the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction,” and 2) reflects “the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community.” Analysis of the subject property by staff has determined that the subject building’s design does not represent an example of Late Modern-style architecture that meets criteria for designation as a Historic-Cultural Monument. Although the subject building exhibits character-defining features of Late Modern-style commercial architecture typical of the 1960s-70s such as stone 5610 York Boulevard CHC-2009-404-HCM Page 3 of 3 covered wall surfaces, large glass windows, and a distinctive roof form, this building does not constitute a particularly outstanding or distinctive example of this style. Although having a distinctive roof form, the subject building’s design as a whole does not appear to be a highly significant example of Late Modern design. The nomination argues that the subject building’s association with the “Marina Style,” a standardized design for supermarkets used by the Safeway Company, renders it eligible for designation. Although this design is clearly associated with the development of the company, this prototype design appears to have only been a loose set of design features. The subject building appears to have only been a modestly representative example, incorporating some design elements of the “Marina Style.” Other examples of this style presented in the application material do appear to more successfully embody this design standard. The nomination also argues that the subject building is eligible for local designation based on its association with the Safeway Company. As the company constructed hundreds of supermarket locations throughout the United States, the subject building does not appear to have any particular distinction from the other Safeway supermarkets. Although the company was founded in Los Angeles in 1914, the subject building and its location do not have any specific links with the original establishment of the company. Because of legally permitted demolition and renovation work performed on the building prior to the consideration hearing with the Cultural Heritage Commission, the subject building exhibits severe integrity issues relative to its original architectural design and extant fabric. While the Cultural Heritage Ordinance does not have a specific test of “integrity,” a potential resource evaluated against the ordinance’s architectural criterion should retain the character-defining features that enable it to embody a particular architectural style. Although the subject building retains its essential form owing to its intact roof, the extent of renovations and removal of original building fabric have ultimately compromised its original design. Should the subject building have maintained a high degree of intact architectural integrity, the Late Modern architectural design itself would not have rendered it eligible for local designation. Based on the specified criteria, the subject property does not meet criteria for designation as a Historic-Cultural Monument. BACKGROUND At its meeting of February 19, 2009, the Cultural Heritage Commission voted to take the application under consideration. On March 5, 2009, the Cultural Heritage Commission toured the subject property. Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION CASE NO.: CHC -2009 -404 -HCM ENV-2009-405-CE HEARING DATE: February 19, 2009 Location: 5610 York Blvd, 5625 Buchanan St. TIME: 10:00 AM Council District: 1/14 PLACE : City Hall, Room 1010 Community Plan Area: Northeast Los Angeles 200 N. Spring Street Area Planning Commission: East Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA Neighborhood Council: Historic Highland Park 90012 Legal Description: Lot 8 and 17 of Block 15 of Grider and Hamilton’s Highland Park Tract PROJECT: Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the HIGHLAND PARK SAFEWAY STORE REQUEST: Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument OWNER: Schwab, Robert H and Louis H. Trust, Schwab, R Trust, H. Schwab Trust c/o R and L Properties 10940 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2250 Los Angeles, CA 90024-3954 APPLICANT: Charles J. Fisher Highland Park Heritage Trust 140 South Avenue 57 Los Angeles, CA 90042 RECOMMENDATION That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal may warrant further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. S. GAIL GOLDBERG, AICP Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] ________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information to Users
    The nature of competition in food retailing units: A Tucson case study Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Washington, Melvelyn Ronett, 1955- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 24/09/2021 03:23:23 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/291775 INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Notices & the Courts
    PUBLIC NOTICES B1 DAILY BUSINESS REVIEW TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2021 dailybusinessreview.com & THE COURTS BROWARD PUBLIC NOTICES BUSINESS LEADS THE COURTS WEB SEARCH FORECLOSURE NOTICES: Notices of Action, NEW CASES FILED: US District Court, circuit court, EMERGENCY JUDGES: Listing of emergency judges Search our extensive database of public notices for Notices of Sale, Tax Deeds B5 family civil and probate cases B2 on duty at night and on weekends in civil, probate, FREE. Search for past, present and future notices in criminal, juvenile circuit and county courts. Also duty Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach. SALES: Auto, warehouse items and other BUSINESS TAX RECEIPTS (OCCUPATIONAL Magistrate and Federal Court Judges B14 properties for sale B8 LICENSES): Names, addresses, phone numbers Simply visit: CALENDARS: Suspensions in Miami-Dade, Broward, FICTITIOUS NAMES: Notices of intent and type of business of those who have received https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/public-notices/ and Palm Beach. Confirmation of judges’ daily motion to register business licenses B3 calendars in Miami-Dade B14 To search foreclosure sales by sale date visit: MARRIAGE LICENSES: Name, date of birth and city FAMILY MATTERS: Marriage dissolutions, adoptions, https://www.law.com/dailybusinessreview/foreclosures/ DIRECTORIES: Addresses, telephone numbers, and termination of parental rights B8 of those issued marriage licenses B3 names, and contact information for circuit and CREDIT INFORMATION: Liens filed against PROBATE NOTICES: Notices to Creditors, county
    [Show full text]
  • Document.Pdf
    SAFEWAY // MCMINNVILLE, OR CORPORATE 20-YEAR ABSOLUTE NET LEASE Offering Memorandum EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY JOSEPH BLATNER // Senior Vice President 503.200.2029 // [email protected] NON-ENDORSEMENT & DISCLAIMER NOTICE CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER The information contained in the following Marketing Brochure is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from Marcus & Millichap and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the written consent of Marcus & Millichap. This Marketing Brochure has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough due diligence investigation. Marcus & Millichap has not made any investigation, and makes no warranty or representation, with respect to the income or expenses for the subject property, the future projected financial performance of the property, the size and square footage of the property and improvements, the presence or absence of contaminating substances, PCB’s or asbestos, the compliance with State and Federal regulations, the physical condition of the improvements thereon, or the financial condition or business prospects of any tenant, or any tenant’s plans or intentions to continue its occupancy of the subject property. The information contained in this Marketing Brochure has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable; however, Marcus & Millichap has not verified, and will not verify, any of the information contained herein, nor has Marcus & Millichap conducted any investigation regarding these matters and makes no warranty or representation whatsoever regarding the accuracy or completeness of the information provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 239 05-Jun-2019 7:38:44 State of California Dept. of Alcoholic
    05-Jun-2019 State of California Page 1 of 239 7:38:44 Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control List of All Surrendered Retail Licenses in MONROVIA District File M Dup Current Type GEO Primary Name DBA Name Type Number I Count Status Status Date Dist Prem Street Address ------ ------------ - -------- ------------- ----------------- -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ 20 250606 Y SUREND 02/25/2017 1900 KOJONROJ, PONGPUN DBA: MINI A 1 MART 2 11550 COLIMA RD WHITTIER, CA 90604 61 274544 Y SUREND 04/17/2017 1900 JUAREZ MUNOZ, BARTOLO DBA: CAL TIKI BAR 2 3835 WHITTIER BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90023-2430 20 389309 Y SUREND 12/13/2017 1900 BOULOS, LEON MORID DBA: EDDIES MINI MART 2 11236 WHITTIER BLVD WHITTIER, CA 90606 48 427779 Y SUREND 12/04/2015 1900 OCEANS SPORTS BAR INC DBA: OCEANS SPORTS BAR 2 14304-08 TELEGRAPH RD ATTN FREDERICK ALANIS WHITTIER, CA 90604-2905 41 507614 Y SUREND 02/04/2019 1900 GUANGYANG INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT INC DBA: LITTLE SHEEP MONGOLIAN HOT POT 2 1655 S AZUSA AVE STE E HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745-3829 21 512694 Y SUREND 04/02/2014 1900 HONG KONG SUPERMARKET OF HACIENDA HEIGHTS,DBA: L HONGTD KONG SUPERMARKET 2 3130 COLIMA RD HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CA 91745-6301 41 520103 Y SUREND 07/24/2018 1900 MAMMA'S BRICK OVEN, INC. DBA: MAMMAS BRICK OVEN PIZZA & PASTA 2 311 S ROSEMEAD BLVD #102-373 PASADENA, CA 91107-4954 47 568538 Y SUREND 09/27/2018 1900 HUASHI GARDEN DBA: HUASHI GARDEN 2 19240 COLIMA RD ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748-3004 41 571291 Y SUREND 12/08/2018 1900 JANG'S FAMILY CORPORATION DBA: MISONG 2 18438 COLIMA RD STE 107 ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748-5822 41 571886 Y SUREND 07/16/2018 1900 BOO FACTOR LLC DBA: AMY'S PATIO CAFE 2 900 E ALTADENA DR ALTADENA, CA 91001-2034 21 407121 Y SUREND 06/08/2015 1901 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY DBA: RALPHS 199 2 345 E MAIN ST ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 05-Jun-2019 State of California Page 2 of 239 7:38:44 Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • 4700 Yelm Hwy Se | Lacey, Wa Olympia, Wa Msa
    4700 YELM HWY SE | LACEY, WA OLYMPIA, WA MSA SINGLE-TENANT ABSOLUTE NET LEASE | +/- 19.6 YEARS REMAINING I RENT INCREASES THIS INVESTMENT OFFERING MEMORANDUM Seller and Thomas Company each expressly has been prepared by Thomas Company and reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to does not purport to provide a necessarily accurate reject any and all expressions of interest or summary of the Property or any of the documents offers regarding the Property and/or terminate related thereto, nor do they purport to be all discussions with any entity at any time with PLEASE CONTACT inclusive or to contained all of the information or without notice. Seller shall have no legal which prospective investors may need or desire. commitment or obligation to sell the property JEFFREY S. THOMAS All projections have been developed by Seller, to any entity reviewing the Investment Offering Thomas Company and designated sources, Memorandum or making an offer to purchase the THOMAS COMPANY and are based upon assumptions relating to the Property unless and until such offer is approved 210 Third Avenue South general economy, competition and other factors by Seller, a written agreement for the purchase of beyond the control of Seller, and therefore are the Property has been fully executed, delivered Suite 5C subject to variation. No representation is made and approved by Seller and its legal counsel and Seattle, WA 98104 by Seller or Thomas Company as to the accuracy any conditions to Seller’s obligations thereunder 800.775.3350 or completeness of the information contained have been satisfied or waived.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Responds to Motion for Retrial; Discredits Chance's Claims Uncertain Future for Rice Recycling
    0 The SINCE 1916 RicVOLUME 79, NO. 5 e ThresheEVERYBODY GETS A SECOND CHANCE SEPTEMBER 20, r1991 Rice responds to motion for retrial; discredits Chance's claims The audit consisted of one phone call by Shaila K. Dewan with each of these professors. Timeline of events Chance claims that Rice manufac- On Wednesday, Sept 11, Ricc tured evidence and includes a letter April 15,1988. Chance files a class-action lawsuit against University filed a motion in response from Fleming which states that he Rice, alleging that the university has discriminated against to tenured English professor Jane was never asked to do a review of women in pay and terms and conditions of employment. In Chance's request for a new trial in an Chance's work. Fleming also states addition, she sues Grob, chair of the English department from ongoing battle over charges of sexual that he does not remember then discrimination. The document called Provost William Gordon's name, with 1981 to 1986, for punitive damages, alleging that he has Chance's request "a hodgepodge of whom the conversation about Chance engaged in a "vicious and protracted campaign to insult, defamatory, unsupported allegations, allegedly took place. demean and harass" her. vituperatively uttered in a pitiful at- Fleming also states, however, that April 22,1988. Three female members of the department tempt to save face after losing a law- while he was chair of the English praise Grob and the department in a Thresher article: suit" Chance, the motion said, "failed department at Princeton, he would professor Meredith Skura, associate professor Susan Wood to elicit one scintilla of evidence of receive several requests a month for (then assistant professor) and lecturer Katherine Wallingford.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Karl Langhorst Director, Loss Prevention Randall's /Tom
    Testimony of Karl Langhorst Director, Loss Prevention Randall’s /Tom Thumb a Safeway Company before the House Judiciary Committee Crime Subcommittee’s hearing “Organized Retail Theft: Fostering a Comprehensive Public-Private Response” October 25, 2007 10:00 a.m. 2141 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Testimony of Karl Langhorst Director, Loss Prevention Randall’s /Tom Thumb a Safeway Company before the House Judiciary Committee Crime Subcommittee October 25, 2007 Chairman Conyers, Chairman Scott, Congressmen Smith and Forbes, and members of the committee, good morning. Thank you for the opportunity to testify before the Crime Subcommittee today on the growing problem of organized retail crime. My name is Karl Langhorst, Director of Loss Prevention for Randall’s/Tom Thumb of Texas, a division of Safeway. Safeway Inc. is a Fortune 100 company and one of the largest food and drug retailers in North America. The company operates 1,738 stores in the United States and western Canada and had annual sales of $40.2 billion in 2006. I have been invited here to share with you our experience with the increasing problem of organized retail crime (ORC). Retailers have always had to deal with shoplifting as part of doing business, but let me be clear, ORC is not shoplifting. It is theft committed by professionals, in large volume, for resale. It is being committed against retailers of every type at an increasing rate. Safeway estimates a loss of $100 million dollars annually due to ORC. According to the FBI, the national estimate is between $15-30 billion annually. Let me describe for you how sophisticated and organized these enterprises are.
    [Show full text]
  • More Sustainable Food
    MORE SUSTAINABLE FOOD: FRUIT AND VEGETABLES AT THE SUPERMARKET Consumers, JULY 2018 Consumers Association More sustainable food: fruit and vegetables at the supermarket 1 CONTENT Resume 4 preface 6 1 study Design 7 1.1 Research questions 7 1.2 Definition / scope 8 1.2.1 Selection supermarkets 8 1.2.2 Selection of case studies 8 1.2.3 Scope of the study 9 1.2.4 Definition and explanation term sustainable 10 1.3 Research Methods 10 1.3.1 Research supermarket policy 10 1.3.2 Consumer research 12 1.3.3 Research case studies 12 2 Results 13 2.1 Sustainability initiatives fruits and vegetables incl. Marks 13 2.1.1 Sustainability labels fruit and vegetables 13 2.1.2 Sustainability Initiatives fruit and vegetables 17 2.1.3 Sustainability Themes 18 2.1.4 International perspective 22 2.2 Supermarket Policy sustainability fruit and vegetables 25 2.2.1 Purchasing Organization Fruit & Vegetables 25 2.2.2 Sustainability generally Fruit & Vegetables 27 2.2.3 Environment: Ambition & Policy and Implementation & monitoring 32 2.2.4 Social: Ambition & Policy and Implementation & monitoring 40 2.2.5 Training & Support 47 2.2.6 Seasonal Products 49 2.2.7 Food waste 50 2.2.8 Final questions: challenges and responsibilities of supermarkets 54 2.2.9 Summary of results by supermarket chain 55 2.3 consumer research 57 2.3.1 The concept of sustainability 57 2.3.2 Purchase of vegetables and fruits 58 2.3.3 Consumers sustainability in fruit and vegetables 59 2.4 Results of case studies 61 2.4.1 Strawberry 63 2.4.2 Banana 72 2.4.3 Paprika 82 2.4.4 Green Bean 89 Consumers
    [Show full text]
  • Food Distribution in the United States the Struggle Between Independents
    University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 Formerly American Law Register VOL. 99 JUNE, 1951 No. 8 FOOD DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES, THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN INDEPENDENTS AND CHAINS By CARL H. FULDA t I. INTRODUCTION * The late Huey Long, contending for the enactment of a statute levying an occupation or license tax upon chain stores doing business in Louisiana, exclaimed in a speech: "I would rather have thieves and gangsters than chain stores inLouisiana." 1 In 1935, a few years later, the director of the National Association of Retail Grocers submitted a statement to the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives, I Associate Professor of Law, Rutgers University School of Law. J.U.D., 1931, Univ. of Freiburg, Germany; LL. B., 1938, Yale Univ. Member of the New York Bar, 1941. This study was originally prepared under the auspices of the Association of American Law Schools as one of a series of industry studies which the Association is sponsoring through its Committee on Auxiliary Business and Social Materials for use in courses on the antitrust laws. It has been separately published and copyrighted by the Association and is printed here by permission with some slight modifications. The study was undertaken at the suggestion of Professor Ralph F. Fuchs of Indiana University School of Law, chairman of the editorial group for the industry studies, to whom the writer is deeply indebted. His advice during the preparation of the study and his many suggestions for changes in the manuscript contributed greatly to the improvement of the text. Acknowledgments are also due to other members of the committee, particularly Professors Ralph S.
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Chain Pharmacies
    PARTICIPATING CHAIN PHARMACIES A & P Pharmacy Discount Drug Mart Hy-Vee, Drug Town Network Pharmacy Shoppers Pharmacy ABCO Pharmacy Doc's Drugs Ingles Pharmacy Oncology Pharmacy Services Shoprite Pharmacy Acme Pharmacy Drug Emporium Integrity Healthcare Services P&C Food Market Shurfine Pharmacy Acme, Lucky, Osco, Sav-on Drug Fair Kare Pharmacy Pacmed Clinic Pharmacy Smith's Food & Drug Center Albertson's Pharmacy Duane Reade Kash N' Karry Pharmacy Pamida Pharmacy Snyder Drug Stores Allcare Pharmacy Eagle Pharmacy Kelsey Seybold Clinic Pharmacy Park Nicollet Pharmacy Southern Family Markets Ambulatory Pharmaceutical Services Edgehill Drugs Kerr Drug Pathmark Stadtlander Pharmacy Anchor Pharmacy Express, Thrift, Treasury Keystone Medicine Chest Payless Pharmacy Standard Drug Company Appletree Pharmacy Fagen Pharmacy King Kullen Pharmacy Pediatric Services of America Star Pharmacy Arrow Pharmacy Fairview Pharmacy Kinney Drug's Pharma-Card Statscript Pharmacy Aurora Pharmacy Family Care Pharmacy Kleins Supermarket Pharmacy Pharmacy Plus Steele's Pharmacy B J's Pharmacy Family Drug Klinck, Drug Barn Presbyterian Retail Pharmacy Stop & Shop Pharmacy Bakers Pharmacy Family Fare Klingensmith's Drug Price Chopper Pharmacy Super D Bartell Drugs Family Pharmacy Kmart Pharmacy Price Less Drug Super Food Mart Basha's United Drug Fedco Drug Knight Drugs Price Wise, Piggly Wiggly Super Fresh Pharmacy Bel Air Pharmacy Finast Pharmacy Kohlls Pharmacy Prime Med Pharmacy Super RX Pharmacy Big Bear Pharmacy Food 4 Less Pharmacy Kopp Drug Publix Pharmacy
    [Show full text]
  • Optionalistapril2019.Pdf
    Account Number Name Address City Zip Code County Signed Affidavit Returned Affidavit Option Final Notice Sent DL20768 Vons Market 1430 S Fairfax Ave Los Angeles 90019 Los Angeles 4/28/17 OPTION A 4/19/17 DL20769 Sunshine Liquor 5677 W Pico Blvd Los Angeles 90019 Los Angeles 4/25/17 OPTION A 4/19/17 DL20771 Selam Market 5534 W Pico Blvd Los Angeles 90019 Los Angeles 4/27/17 OPTION A 4/19/17 DL61442 7-Eleven Food Store 1075 S Fairfax Ave Los Angeles 90019 Los Angeles 5/8/17 OPTION A 4/19/17 DL63467 Walgreens Drug Store 5843 W Pico Blvd Los Angeles 90019 Los Angeles 5/2/17 OPTION A 4/19/17 DL141090.001 Jordan Market 1449 Westwood Blvd Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 7/28/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL220910.001 Target 10861 Weyburn Ave Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 12/4/14 OPTION A DL28742 7-Eleven 1400 Westwood Blvd Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 3/24/15 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL28743 Tochal Mini Market 1418 Westwood Blvd Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 7/29/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL28745 Bristol Farms 1515 Westwood Blvd Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 12/3/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL41783 Stop Market 958 Gayley Ave Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 7/21/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL54515 Ralphs Fresh Fare 10861 Weyburn Ave Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 11/24/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL55831 Chevron 10984 Le Conte Ave Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 11/24/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL60416 Whole Foods Market 1050 Gayley Ave Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 8/7/14 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL61385 CVS/pharmacy 1001 Westwood Blvd Los Angeles 90024 Los Angeles 4/23/15 OPTION A 7/17/14 DL61953 CVS/pharmacy
    [Show full text]
  • WHERE Do WE STAND on UPC IMPLEMENTATION
    WHERE Do WE STAND ON UPC IMPLEMENTATION by Tom Wilson Vice President, McKinsey & Co. New York, New York I. Four topics will be discussed 2. Source symbol marking A. Status against program goals - Grocery manufacturers B. Public policy issues - Retailers (private - Price mark legislation label) - Labor union position 3. Availability of equipment c. Recent code council actions D. Open issues IV. Code conversion membership in UPCC II. Key dates in UPC development 1966 - Kroger Technology Conference 1975 Cumula- 1969 - IMS Test Installation to tive 1970 - AD HOC Committee formed 1972 1973 1974 Date Total (8/70) Manufac- 1971 - Code Selection Announced turers 209 578 1582 1284 3653 (5/71) 1972 - Code Council Formed (3/72) Retailers 84 62 58 24 228 First Number Issues (5/72) —— —— First U.S. Scanner Test 293 640 1640 1308 3881 (7/72) 1973 - Symbol Selection Announced (4/73) v. Source symbol marking Symbol Specifications Pub- A. Goal was to have 50 percent of lished (5/73) nonvariable weight items First UPC Scanner Announced source marked by year-end 1974, (10/73) 75 percent by year-end 1975. 1974 - First UPC Scanner Installed 1. Percentages are on all (6/74) commodity item movement 1975 - 50 Percent Source Symbol basis. Marking (5/75) 2. 50 percent source mark was First Price Mark Legislation economic break-even. (6/75) B. Progress by manufacturers judged sufficient to meet these III. Status against goals goals. A. Three basic measurers of UPC 1. Testing chains report 55-65 implementation percent level on shelf 1. Code conversion 2. Nielsen audit shows 58 - Membership in UGPCC percent in July - Use on shippers, paper work February 76/page 96 Journal of Food Distribution Researck VI, Percentage of items with UPC VIII.
    [Show full text]