DOCSLIB.ORG

Investment Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investment Review Volume 7, Issue 1, 2011 AU 10252 AU CA 94105 SAN FRANCISCO, 101 MARKET STREET F U N M I T M Y O ederal C D E V E C E L N O T E P R M F r E O N R eserve T IN VE S STMENT B ank o F s an F rancisco Community Develop Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW www.frbsf.org/cdinvestments Articles Global Agricultural Value Chains: Sustainable Growth as a Means for Sustainable Development ment Investment Review Patricia Lee Devaney, Root Capital International Housing Partnership Exchange Thomas A. Bledsoe and Paul Weech, Housing Partnership Network Catalyzing American Retail Investment in Community Development Finance: What Can We Learn from Other SRI Success Stories? Caroline Bressan and Eliza M. Erikson, Calvert Foundation Unlocking Local Capital for Development: Shared Interest’s Guarantee Fund for South Africa Donna Katzin, Shared Interest and Robert Rosenbloom, Strategic Philanthropy Advisors, LLC Translating Plain English: Can the Peterborough Social Impact Bond Construct Apply Stateside? Drew von Glahn and Caroline Whistler, Third Sector Capital Partners Learning Social Metrics from International Development Paul Veldman, Columbia University Commentary The Latest Frontiers for Financial Inclusion: Using Mobile Phones to Reach the Unbanked Volume 7, Issue 1, 2011 Volume Tillman Bruett, UN Capital Development Fund CRA Goes Global: A Good Idea in the United States Could Use a Makeover and a Bigger Audience POSTAGE & FEES PAID POSTAGE SAN FRANCISCO, CA SAN FRANCISCO, David A. Smith, Affordable Housing Institute PERMIT NO. 752 PERMIT NO. PRSRT STD Why Latin America Urgently Needs CRA, and Why CRA Won’t Work for Latin America Tova Maria Solo NTER FO CE R Using the Framework of the Community Reinvestment C O S M T N Act to Support Rural Communities in China M E U M N FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO SAN BANK OF RESERVE FEDERAL Prabal Chakrabarti, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston T I T S Y E V D N E I VE T LOPMEN Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW The Community Development Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco created the Center for Community Development Investments to research and disseminate best practices in providing capital to low- and moderate-income communities. Part of this mission is accomplished by publishing the Community Development Investment Review. The Review brings together experts to write about various community development investment topics including: Finance—new tools, techniques, or approaches that increase the volume, lower the cost, lower the risk, or in any way make investments in low-income communities more attractive; Collaborations—ways in which different groups can pool resources and expertise to address the capital needs of low-income communities; Public Policy—analysis of how government and public policy influence community development finance options; Best Practices—showcase innovative projects, people, or institutions that are improving the investment opportunities in low-income areas. The goal of the Review is to bridge the gap between theory and practice and to enlist as many viewpoints as possible—government, nonprofits, financial institutions, and beneficiaries. As a leading economist in the community development field describes it, the Review provides “ideas for people who get things done.” For submission guidelines and themes of upcoming issues, visit our website: www.frbsf. Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW org/cdinvestments. You may also contact David Erickson, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 101 Market Street, Mailstop 215, San Francisco, California, 94105-1530. (415) 974-3467, [email protected]. Free subscriptions and additional copies are available upon request from the Community Development Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105, or call (415) 974-3467. Change-of-address and subscription cancellations should be sent directly to the Center for Community Development Investments Community Development Department. Please include the current mailing label as Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco well as any new information. www.frbsf.org/cdinvestments The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco or the Federal Reserve System. Material herein may be reprinted or abstracted as long as the Community Development Investment Review is credited. Center Staff Advisory Committee Joy Hoffmann, FRBSF Group Vice President Frank Altman, Community Reinvestment Fund Scott Turner, Vice President Nancy Andrews, Low Income Investment Fund John Olson, Senior Advisor Jim Carr, National Community Reinvestment Coalition David Erickson, Center Manager Prabal Chakrabarti, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Ian Galloway, Investment Associate Catherine Dolan, Opportunity Finance Network Andrew Kelman, Bank of America Securities Judd Levy, New York State Housing Finance Agency John Moon, Federal Reserve Board of Governors Kirsten Moy, Aspen Institute Mark Pinsky, Opportunity Finance Network John Quigley, University of California, Berkeley Lisa Richter, GPS Capital Partners, LLC Benson Roberts, U.S. Department of the Treasury Clifford N. Rosenthal, NFCDCU Ruth Salzman, Russell Berrie Foundation Ellen Seidman, Consultant Bob Taylor, Wells Fargo CDC Kerwin Tesdell, Community Development Venture Capital Alliance Betsy Zeidman, Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights Table of Contents ARTICLES Global Agricultural Value Chains: Sustainable Growth as a Means for Sustainable Development .......................................................................................2 Patricia Lee Devaney, Root Capital International Housing Partnership Exchange ................................................................................12 Thomas A. Bledsoe and Paul Weech, Housing Partnership Network Catalyzing American Retail Investment in Community Development Finance: What Can We Learn from Other SRI Success Stories? ..................................................................28 Caroline Bressan and Eliza M. Erikson, Calvert Foundation Unlocking Local Capital for Development: Shared Interest’s Guarantee Fund for South Africa .......42 Donna Katzin, Shared Interest and Robert Rosenbloom, Strategic Philanthropy Advisors, LLC Translating Plain English: Can the Peterborough Social Impact Bond Construct Apply Stateside? ......................................................................................58 Drew von Glahn and Caroline Whistler, Third Sector Capital Partners Learning Social Metrics from International Development .............................................................. 71 Paul Veldman, Columbia University COMMENTARY The Latest Frontiers for Financial Inclusion: Using Mobile Phones to Reach the Unbanked .........114 Tillman Bruett, UN Capital Development Fund CRA Goes Global: A Good Idea in the United States Could Use a Makeover and a Bigger Audience .............................................................................119 David A. Smith, Affordable Housing Institute Why Latin America Urgently Needs CRA, and Why CRA Won’t Work for Latin America ................134 Tova Maria Solo Using the Framework of the Community Reinvestment Act to Support Rural Communities in China ................................................................................141 Prabal Chakrabarti, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Foreword David J. Erickson March 2011 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ow-income people in the U.S. and abroad face similar challenges: access to credit, housing, jobs, and critical services including health and education. And yet today, those who work on international economic development and community devel- opment hardly know each other. This issue of the Review is dedicated to a simple Lidea: innovative ideas to solve poverty should not stop at the national border. There are too many good ideas abroad that can help inform our practices domestically, and good ideas here that can be relevant to other countries. This issue of the Review covers a host of ideas, including: innovating how we do small business finance (Root Capital); learning about affordable housing finance from Europe, Canada and Australia (Housing Partnership Network); overcoming regulatory barriers in the U.S. to help free up more impact capital as has been done in Europe (Calvert Founda- tion); using credit enhancements to promote bank lending in South Africa (Shared Interest and Strategic Philanthropy Advisors); finding ways to capitalize on the UK’s innovative social impact bond concept for the U.S. (Third Sector Capital Partners); learning the best practices in measuring social metrics from around the world (Paul Veldman, Columbia University); using mobile phones to reach the unbanked (UN Capital Development Fund); thinking about how the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) might go global (David Smith, Affordable Housing Institute); and considering how CRA might, or might not, work in Latin America (Tova Solo, formerly with the World Bank) and China (Prabal Chakrabarti, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston). Economist Jeffrey Sachs, in his book The End of Poverty, states that “extreme poverty can be ended, not in the time of our grandchildren, but in our time.” If we are to live up to Sachs’ charge, it is essential that we share the best ideas we have from both the interna- tional and domestic antipoverty communities. 2 Community Development INVESTMENT REVIEW Global Agricultural Value Chains: Sustainable Growth as a Means for Sustainable Development Patricia Lee Devaney Root
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Solidarity Economies
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Solidarity Economies, Networks and the Positioning of Power in Alternative Cultural Production and Activism in Brazil: The Case of Fora do Eixo A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication by Andrew C. Whitworth-Smith Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Hallin, Chair Professor Boatema Boateng Professor Nitin Govil Professor John McMurria Professor Toby Miller Professor Nancy Postero 2014 COPYRIGHT BY Andrew C. Whitworth-Smith 2014 Some Rights Reserved This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ The Dissertation of Andrew C. Whitworth-Smith is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2014 iii DEDICATION To Mia Jarlov, for your passion and humility, your capacity to presuppose the best in others, for your endurance and strength, and above
    [Show full text]
  • Global Philanthropy Forum Conference April 18–20 · Washington, Dc
    GLOBAL PHILANTHROPY FORUM CONFERENCE APRIL 18–20 · WASHINGTON, DC 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference This book includes transcripts from the plenary sessions and keynote conversations of the 2017 Global Philanthropy Forum Conference. The statements made and views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of GPF, its participants, World Affairs or any of its funders. Prior to publication, the authors were given the opportunity to review their remarks. Some have made minor adjustments. In general, we have sought to preserve the tone of these panels to give the reader a sense of the Conference. The Conference would not have been possible without the support of our partners and members listed below, as well as the dedication of the wonderful team at World Affairs. Special thanks go to the GPF team—Suzy Antounian, Bayanne Alrawi, Laura Beatty, Noelle Germone, Deidre Graham, Elizabeth Haffa, Mary Hanley, Olivia Heffernan, Tori Hirsch, Meghan Kennedy, DJ Latham, Jarrod Sport, Geena St. Andrew, Marla Stein, Carla Thorson and Anna Wirth—for their work and dedication to the GPF, its community and its mission. STRATEGIC PARTNERS Newman’s Own Foundation USAID The David & Lucile Packard The MasterCard Foundation Foundation Anonymous Skoll Foundation The Rockefeller Foundation Skoll Global Threats Fund Margaret A. Cargill Foundation The Walton Family Foundation Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation The World Bank IFC (International Finance SUPPORTING MEMBERS Corporation) The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust MEMBERS Conrad N. Hilton Foundation Anonymous Humanity United Felipe Medina IDB Omidyar Network Maja Kristin Sall Family Foundation MacArthur Foundation Qatar Foundation International Charles Stewart Mott Foundation The Global Philanthropy Forum is a project of World Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Revolutions in Global Philanthropy Maximilian Martin
    Four Revolutions in Global Philanthropy Maximilian Martin Working Papers Vol. 1 Martin, Maximilian. 2011. ³Four Revolutions in Global Philanthropy´Impact Economy Working Paper, Vol.1 Table of Contents Philanthropy is currently undergoing four revolutions in parallel. This paper identifies and analyzes the four main fault lines which will influence the next decades of global philanthropy. All are related to what we can refer to as the market revolution in global philanthropy. As global philanthropy moves beyond grantmaking, into investment approaches that produce a social as well as a financial return, this accelerates the mainstreaming of a variety of niche activities. They marry effectiveness, social impact, and market mechanisms. 1. Global Philanthropy: A Field in Transition ............................................................................... 3 2. From Inefficient Social Capital Markets to Value-Driven Allocation ......................................... 7 3. Revolution One: Amplifying Social Entrepreneurship through Synthetic Social Business ......11 4. Revolution Two: From Microfinance to Inclusive Financial Services ......................................16 5. Revolution Three: From Development Assistance to Base-of-the-Pyramid Investments .......23 6. Revolution Four: From Classical Grantmaking to Entrepreneurial Internalization of Externalities ..............................................................................................................................29 7. Conclusion: Where Are We Headed? ....................................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Global Programme on Market Access: Opportunities and Options
    Towards a Global Programme on Market Access: Opportunities and Options Report prepared for IFAD1 Sheila Page April 2003 ODI 111, Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7JD Tel: +44 20 7922 0300 Fax: +44 20 7922 0399 Email: [email protected] Contents Summary 1 Market access as an instrument of development 3 What do we mean by market access? 5 Poverty and markets 7 The stages of ‘market access’ 7 Awareness of possibility of exporting 8 Familiarity with buyers 8 Familiarity with standards, including health and safety 9 Access to equipment and other inputs 10 Access to investment capital 10 Access to working capital 10 Access to appropriate labour 10 Technology 11 Organisation and orientation of firm 11 Legal regimes 11 Transport and communications, local 11 Transport and communications, international 12 Tariffs and non-tariff barriers 12 Other trading conditions 13 Which problems matter, for how long? 13 Different ways of providing market access: advantages and disadvantages 14 Direct foreign investment and ownership 14 Large direct private buyers 15 Initiatives by developing country producers 16 Alternative trading companies 17 Export promotion agencies (and other local government policy) 21 Import promotion agencies 22 Aid programmes 23 Targeted technical research 24 Agencies promoting small production 25 Complementarities and differences among market structures 26 Possible initiatives by IFAD 30 2 Table 1 How different initiatives affect the necessary conditions for market access 33 Table 2 Direct and Indirect Effects on Poverty 35 Table
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, MD, Msc Qualifications & Biography
    Dr. Rajiv J. Shah, MD, MSc Qualifications & Biography DR. SHAH IS A RESPECTED LEADER WITH A PROVEN TRACK RECORD IN GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT WITH DEEP EXPERIENCE IN MANY SECTORS, INCLUDING HEALTH, AGRICULTURE, WATER, AND FINANCIAL SERVICES: • He has led and worked with many of the initiatives that are defining best practice in the field of development - The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, The Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria and The Alliance for a Green Revolution for Africa (AGRA) to name a few. With respect to AGRA in particular, Dr. Shah helped create the organization, build the board, recruit leadership and oversee operations. • He has worked around the world (especially in Africa and Asia), and has deep content and operational experience in global health, agriculture and food security and financial services for the poor. Raj helped launch the Global Development program at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and directly managed the foundation’s nearly $1.3 billion portfolio of investments in agricultural development. He also was the founding director of the Foundation’s Financial Services to the Poor portfolio and held numerous leadership roles within the Foundation Global Health program. Dr. Shah has also helped lead and is an important contributor to President Obama’s global food security initiative. • He has worked closely with many organizations who are key partners to the USAID and its mission. These include the Global Fund for AIDS, TB and Malaria, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) and a range of innovative public-private partnerships in a variety of sectors in global development.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilizing Entrepreneurship
    volume 7 | issue 4 A quarterly journal published by MIT Press innovations TECHNOLOGY | GOVERNANCE | GLOBALIZATION Mobilizing Entrepreneurship Lead Essays Iqbal Quadir Form, Transform, Platform Raj Gollamudi Mobilizing Entrepreneurship Chris Locke The Challenge of Sustaining App Entrepreneurs Cases Authored by Innovators Mark Davies Fertilizer by Phone Hans Wijayasuriya and Michael de Soyza Bridging Divides with Inclusive mCommerce Erik Hersman Mobilizing Tech Entrepreneurs in Africa Analysis and Perspective on Policy Chris Williamson & Corina Gardner Thinking Horizontally and Vertically: A Better Way to Approach Mobile Innovation Maja Andjelkovic and Saori Imaizumi Mobile Entrepreneurship and Employment Jane Vincent Using ICTs to Support New Global Societies Philip Auerswald and Jenny Stefanotti Integrating Technology and Institutional Change ENTREPRENEURIAL SOLUTIONS TO GLOBAL CHALLENGES Editors OpenInnovations Team Advisory Board Philip Auerswald Adam Hasler Susan Davis Iqbal Quadir Colleen Kaman Bill Drayton Contributing Editors Kate Mytty David Kellogg Chris Williamson Laura Neuhaus Eric Lemelson Corina Gardner Publisher Granger Morgan David Taverner Nicholas Sullivan Jacqueline Novogratz Roger Stough Senior Editor James Turner Winthrop Carty Xue Lan Managing Editor Editorial Board Michael Youngblood David Audretsch Senior Researcher Matthew Bunn Adam Hasler Maryann Feldman Richard Florida Associate Editors Peter Mandaville Dody Riggs Julia Novy-Hildesley Helen Snively Francisco Veloso Strategic Advisor Yang Xuedong Erin Krampetz Innovations: Technology | Governance | Globalization is co-hosted by the School of Public Policy, George Mason University (Fairfax VA, USA); the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (Cambridge MA, USA); and the Legatum Center for Development and Entrepreneurship, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge MA, USA). Support for the journal is provided in part by the Lemelson Foundation and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multibillion-Euro Potential in Social Innovations
    From smalla to systemic The multibillion-euro potential in social innovations Content Summary 4 Background: Germany is facing significant societal challenges 7 Basic idea: Social innovations play a key role in resolving societal challenges 9 Application: Widespread implementation of social innovations can permanently alter systems 12 Example 1: Systemic change in the healthcare system – better early detection of breast cancer using blind women’s tactile perception Why improve cancer screening? 14 What is the idea? 14 How much potential is available? 15 What does the change look like? 16 Example 2: Systemic change in the healthcare system – preventing mental illness through information/education and contact with those affected at school Why prevent mental health issues? 17 What is the idea? 18 How much potential is available? 19 What does the change look like? 20 Example 3: Systemic change in the education system – earlier detection of truancy and derivation of appropriate actions Why motivate kids who are truant? 21 What is the idea? 22 How much potential is available? 22 What does the change look like? 23 Example 4: Systemic change in the education system – the “Wikipedia for learning” for a self-managed academic journey Why promote digital learning platforms? 24 What is the idea? 24 How much potential is available? 25 What does the change look like? 26 Recommended actions: There are several things that social entrepreneurs and decision makers in these systems can do to help social innovations succeed 27 Recommended actions for partners and patrons 28 Recommended actions for social entrepreneurs 29 Overview of Ashoka Fellows in Germany 32 Key contacts 38 011Summary ajor changes like demographic shifts, global mobility, urbanization, and digita- lization of the working world are poised to reshape our society.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOVISION 2013 Speakers Oct 24 GB
    BRINGING TOGETHER MULTI-STAKEHOLDER PARTNERS TO TRANSLATE SCIENTIFIC ADVANCES INTO ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF CITIZENS BIOVISION SPEAKERS BIOVISION, the World Life Sciences Forum , brings together international decision makers from the academic, private sector, policy-making and civil society sectors to debate over the impact of the latest scientific advances on society. 2013 SPEAKERS* • Geneviève Fioraso (Minister for Higher Education and Research, France) • Marisol Touraine (Minister of Health and Social Affairs, France) • Awa-Marie Coll-Seck ( Health Minister, Senegal) • Carlos Gadelha (Secretary of State, Ministry of Health, Brazil) • Grace Naledi Mandisa Pandor (Minister of Science and Technology, Republic of South Africa) • Michele Bachelet (Former President, Republic of Chile; Executive Director, UN WOMEN) • Anne Glover (Chief Scientific Adviser to the President, European Commission) – Confirmed • Paul Rübig (President STOA, member of European Parliament) • Antonio Fernando Correia de Campos (Vice President, STOA, European Parliament) • John Beddington (Scientific Adviser, United Kingdom Government) • Oleg Chestnov (Assistant Director General, Non Communicable Diseases and Mental Health, WHO, Switzerland) • Kris Christen (Editor and writer, Artificial Retina Project, U.S. Department of Energy) • Gerald Dziekan (Head Safe Surgery, Pulse Oximetry, Care Checklists & AMR Programmes, HO Patient Safety, Switzerland) – Confirmed • Carissa F. Etienne (Assistant Director General, Health Systems and Services, WHO, Switzerland)
    [Show full text]
  • Global Social and Civil Entrepreneurs: an Answer to the Poor Performance of Global Governance?1
    DISCUSSION PAPER WISSENSCHAFTSZENTRUM BERLIN FÜR SOZIALFORSCHUNG SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER BERLIN SP IV 2008-304 Global Social and Civil Entrepreneurs: An Answer to the Poor Performance of Global Governance?1 Tine Stein2 1 Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, held on 28-31 August 2008, in Boston, Massachusetts. 2 Email: [email protected] Tine Stein y Global Social and Civil Entrepreneurs ii ZITIERWEISE z CITATION Tine Stein Global Social and Civil Entrepreneurs: An Answer to the Poor Performance of Global Governance? Discussion Paper SP IV 2008-304, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung 2008 Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung Reichpietschufer 50, 10785 Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany Tel.: +49/30/25491-0 • Fax: +49/30/25491-684 Email: [email protected] • Internet: http://www.wzb.eu/ Tine Stein y Global Social and Civil Entrepreneurs iii Abstract In recent years a new type of political actor has become increasingly important— cosmopolitan individuals acting transnationally in support of the rights and well-being of their “fellow citizens of the world.” The emerging transnational political awareness of private individuals might be seen as a consequence of the poor performance of global governance by international organizations which have been unable to find convincing solutions to global inequality. In response to this failure, individuals like Bono, Al Gore, Muhammad Yunus and Bill Gates mobilize their specific resources, namely, publicity, ideas, and money, to find solutions to international societal prob- lems. These actors often function directly as “change-makers,” bypassing existing institutional arrangements. This paper first assesses the different kinds of social and civil entrepreneurs in global civil society, and identifies the specific features of their type of political action.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Social Entrepreneurs
    LEADING SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS LEADING SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS ABOUT THE COVER LEADING SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURS How Thinking Inside the Box Helped One Ashoka Fellow Tackle What The New York Times Called “The Biggest Health Crisis No One Has Heard Of” Two-and-a-half billion people in the world live with poor vision, which is not only a health problem, but also excludes people from attaining literacy, education and employment, as well as gaining access to information and participating as active citizens. Untreated vision problems cost the global economy $200 billion annually to lost productivity, according to the World Health Organization. Cue Ashoka Fellow Martin Aufmuth, who invented a machine in his laundry room that can make a complete pair of eyeglasses in twelve minutes. His organization, OneDollarGlasses (ODG), uses this “porta- The bending unit – this wooden box contains a complete ble optician’s workshop” in-a-box to train communities to produce optician’s workshop. © Martin Aufmuth customizable eyeglasses, circumventing the traditional provider-pa- tient model and affordability challenges that keep glasses out of reach for so many people around the world. Now in eight countries and spreading, ODG doesn’t just provide glasses; by training people in communities to produce eyeglasses, his solution not only results in affordable glasses so people can work, study and live healthier lives, but also contributes to livelihoods and self-reliance. Training community members to make eyeglasses. Community members are trained to give eye exams, like the trainees © Marianne Dötzer, 2014 on our cover, and then make the glasses, like these trainees from Burkino Faso, (middle right).
    [Show full text]
  • Marshalling Social Entrepreneurship
    1 Editor’s Letter One of the key founding visions of the Marshall Scholarships was to provide “a close accord between our two countries.” This issue features several articles highlighting past, present and future efforts to coordinate our alumni community around facilitating this accord. An expanded AMS News section details an ambitious new effort to further strengthen the Marshall community by establishing permanently-endowed augmented support for the Marshall Scholarships. Aroop Mukharji also provides a historical perspective on efforts to organize our community over the last several decades—from early alumni gatherings to the AMS in its current form. Our special cover for this issue is a symbolic representation of the alumni community’s Nicholas Hartman ongoing role in contributing to strong US-UK relations. The photos forming the scholarship’s Managing Editor logo highlight a selection of alumni images, new scholars and the events that have brought us (Pennsylvania State, B.S. 2003; Dar- together over the last several years. win College, Cambridge, Ph.D. 2008) The newsletter team always welcomes your feedback and article proposals. Please get in Nicholas is a director at the New York touch with us at [email protected]. City office of CKM Advisors and lives Nicholas T. Hartman, Managing Editor in Westchester. Contributors Ushma Savla Neill,Neill Andrew Klaber,Klaber Deputy Editor Editor-at-Large (Northwestern, B.S. 1996, M.S. 1996, Ph.D. 1999; (Yale, B.A. 2004; Magdalen College, Oxford, Sherfield Postdoctoral Fellow, Imperial College 1999) M.Sc. 2005 & M.Sc. 2006; Harvard Law School & After 11 years as a professional editor of biomedical Harvard Business School, J.D./M.B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 3612 Annual Review 06
    Finance for fair trade and support for disadvantaged producers Annual Review for the year ended 30 September 2006 Moderator’s statement Shared Interest is a part of a worldwide movement to promote fairer world trade. As we approach the 200th anniversary of the UK Parliament’s abolition of the slave trade it is sobering to reflect that slavery was for a long time regarded as an essential element of the economic process by which Britain prospered. We may have made slavery illegal, but tens of millions of people are still bound by the shackles of economic injustice. Shared Interest’s pioneering role in finance for fair trade is significant. The past year, our sixteenth trading year, has seen us pass some important milestones: members’ share capital topped £20 million for the first time; direct loans to producers doubled to £1.9 million (showing faster growth than our traditional lending to fair trade importers); we established a regional presence in Kenya and in Costa Rica; and the Shared Interest Foundation hosted its first producer training event. Growth in members’ capital is vital to support our aims to increase longer term loans to fair trade producers. Our regional presence helps us to identify potential borrowers, process loan applications more quickly and identify producers’ training requirements. Two years ago we began to invest in changes to make the Society more effective in supporting our investors and borrower customers. These new business developments are not yet complete and the trading results this year, a profit of £45,000 after share interest, fell slightly short of our plan.
    [Show full text]