A Guide to the Records of the Boston Naval Shipyard
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Peer Review of the Turkish Shipbuilding Industry 2 | Peer Review of the Turkish Shipbuilding Industry
PEER REVIEW OF THE TURKISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY 2 | PEER REVIEW OF THE TURKISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY Foreword This report was prepared under the Council Working Party on Shipbuilding (WP6) peer review process. The opinions expressed and the arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. The report will be made available on the WP6 website: http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/shipbuilding.htm. This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. © OECD (2021) The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions/ PEER REVIEW OF THE TURKISH SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY | 3 Table of contents 1. Executive summary 5 2. Introduction 6 3. Global perspective 7 4. Structure and characteristics of the Turkish shipbuilding industry 9 4.1. The Turkish shipbuilding industry 9 4.2. Maritime equipment industry 17 4.3. Repair and recycling activities 18 4.4. Competitiveness of the Turkish shipbuilding industry 22 5. Government policies affecting the shipbuilding industry 24 5.1. Government policy 24 5.2. Support measures 27 5.3. Policy assessment 31 References 37 ANNEX I: SELECTED INFORMATION ON THE TURKISH SHIPYARDS 38 ANNEX 2: INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SHIPBUILDING SECTOR 41 Tables Table 1. Completions of seagoing vessels by builder country and by ship type 8 Table 2. Building docks in Turkish shipyards 11 Table 3. -
Vintage Notes
VINTAGE NOTES The following chart is a compilation (or cuvee if you will!) of notes from the major Bordeaux critics – Jancis Robinson (JR), Decanter (DC), Wine Spectator (WS), Robert Parker (RP), James Suckling (JS), as well as the lesser known, but thorough, website – Wine Cellar Insider (WCI). If there is anything that was solidified while compiling all the information, is that each critic can have widely different opinions regarding each appellation and each vintage, which can result in conflicting information with regards to the quality. The best advice is to find a critic whose palate and assessments you respect and align with your own palate. This is by no means meant to be taken as gospel, but rather hopefully a way to view & compare several opinions about each vintage in a succinct way, rather than flipping through various tabs and websites. Although there was some editing done on our part on the verbiage used by each publication, we did our best to remain true to their words. Not every vintage has notes from each critic for a few reasons – their publication didn’t offer anything specific enough, or any information at all in some cases, or just a blanket assessment was offered. If there are specific appellations mentioned in each column, it’s referring to the lauded overall quality of the appellation for that vintage. One of the top 3 questions any wine professional or Sommelier is often asked “when can I drink this (insert wine name here)? The answer is rarely an easy one but there is this basic guideline you can follow: if you like your wines to have big fruit flavours and assertive structure, drink the wine soon (and don’t forget to decant it), if you prefer to drink wines that are starting to show tertiary or savoury characteristics (more earthy and leather notes, maybe some smokiness and mushroom), tuck the bottle to the back corner of your cellar or wine fridge and try to forget about it for a few years. -
Proquest Dissertations
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to loe removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 WASHINGTON IRVING CHAMBERS: INNOVATION, PROFESSIONALIZATION, AND THE NEW NAVY, 1872-1919 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorof Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephen Kenneth Stein, B.A., M.A. -
“What Are Marines For?” the United States Marine Corps
“WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Major Subject: History “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era Copyright 2011 Michael Edward Krivdo “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, R. J. Q. Adams James C. Bradford Peter J. Hugill David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. (May 2011) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This dissertation provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. One element scrutinizes the efforts of Commandant Archibald Henderson to transform the Corps into a more nimble and professional organization. Henderson's initiatives are placed within the framework of the several fundamental changes that the U.S. Navy was undergoing as it worked to experiment with, acquire, and incorporate new naval technologies into its own operational concept. -
Publication of a Communication of Approval of a Standard
29.7.2019 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 254/3 V (Announcements) OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2019/C 254/03) This notice is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATION OF APPROVAL OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT ‘Haut-Médoc’ Reference number: PDO-FR-A0710-AM03 Date of communication: 10.4.2019 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Demarcated parcel area Description and reasons This application includes the applications with reference PDO-FR-A0710-AM01 and PDO-FR-A0710-AM02, submit ted on 7 April 2016 and 12 January 2018, respectively. The following is inserted in chapter I, point IV(2) of the specification after the words ‘16 March 2007’: ‘ 28 September 2011, 11 September 2014, 9 June 2015, 8 June 2016, 23 November 2016 and 15 February 2018, and of its standing committee of 25 March 2014’. The purpose of this amendment is to add the dates on which the competent national authority approved changes to the demarcated parcel area within the geographical area of production. Parcels are demarcated by identifying the parcels within the geographical area of production that are suitable for producing the product covered by the regis tered designation of origin in question. Accordingly, as a r esult of this amendment, a new point (b) has been added -
Tradepoint Atlantic Welcomes BAE Systems “Titan” Dry Dock to Baltimore Ushers in New Era of Ship Maintenance and Repair at Sparrows Point
Tradepoint Atlantic Welcomes BAE Systems “Titan” Dry Dock to Baltimore Ushers in New Era of Ship Maintenance and Repair at Sparrows Point BALTIMORE, MD (June 3, 2020) – Tradepoint Atlantic, a 3,300-acre multimodal global logistics center in Baltimore, Maryland, featuring an unmatched combination of access to deep-water berths, rail and highway, today announced that BAE Systems’ “Titan” dry dock will be arriving and docking at the onsite dry dock to undergo a five-month-long repair and maintenance program starting on June 4. This announcement and project ushers in a new era of ship maintenance and repair at Tradepoint Atlantic, and represents a year of work and planning to reopen this legacy industry in Baltimore. The Titan docking process is expected to take nearly 20 hours. BAE Systems' massive Titan dry dock has a 52,534-ton lifting capacity and is one of the world’s largest and most modern floating steel dry docks. It measures 950-feet long, 192-feet wide, and 82-feet tall at the highest point. The Titan is used to service ships as long as 1,000 feet. “The shipyard at Sparrows Point has a rich and important history and it is amazing to see industry returning to it after too many dormant years,” said Governor Larry Hogan. “The growth at Tradepoint Atlantic and the opportunities being provided to the local communities is nothing short of incredible and our administration looks forward to partnering with them for years to come. The dry dock is open for business and that is great news.” The dry dock at Sparrows Point began construction in 1969, and was completed in 1971. -
1945 October 22-28 Navy Day 1945
1 1945 October 22-28 Navy Day 1945 (La Crosse Tribune, 1945 October 23, page 7) 2 Proclamations are often issued in observance of annual events or to recognize significant achievements by an individual or group of people. Navy Day in 1945 was both. Navy Day was established by the Navy League on October 27, 1922. The organization suggested October 27 as the annual day of observance to celebrate the United States Navy for two reasons: October 27 was the birthday of former President Theodore Roosevelt who was an advocate of a strong Navy to extend the power of the United States overseas and protect American interests October 27, 1775, was the anniversary of a Continental Congress report that called for the purchase of merchant ships to outfit as warships to create a navy1 In today's vernacular, one would also say that the navy was coming off a big win. The German and Japanese regimes were in the ashcan in large part because of the United States Navy. Past Navy Days in La Crosse included a dance at the Avalon ballroom and a mass swearing-in ceremony for new navy recruits. This year, 1945, the year of victory in World War II, offered much more. The star of Navy Day 1945 in La Crosse was LSM-104. LSM stands for "Landing Ship, Medium." It was one of the numerous fleets of amphibious vessels the navy used to deliver men, machines, and supplies to beaches. LSM-104 arrived in La Crosse on Monday, October 22.2 The ship had started out from Norfolk, Virginia, with two other ships of the same type. -
SAN DIEGO SHIP MODELERS GUILD Ship’S Name: USS CHESTER (CA 27) Model Builder: Frank Dengler 19 October 20 1
SAN DIEGO SHIP MODELERS GUILD Ship’s Name: USS CHESTER (CA 27) Model Builder: Frank Dengler 19 October 20 1. Ship’s History a. Type/Class: Heavy Cruiser / NORTHAMPTON (CA 26) Originally classified as light cruisers (CL) based on armor and displacement, the class was reclassified as heavy cruisers (CA) 1 July 1931 based on 8”/55 main batteries. Raised foc’sles in NORTHAMPTON, CHESTER, and LOUISVILLE (CA 28) ended just aft of the forward superstructure. Raised foc’sles in CHICAGO (CA 29), HOUSTON (CA 30), and AUGUSTA (CA 31) extended aft of the forward stack for flag staff berthing. b. Namesake: City of Chester, PA. Model builder Frank Dengler was raised in Devon, Chester County, PA. c. Shipbuilder & Location: New York Shipbuilding, Camden, NJ d. Date Commissioned: 24 June 1930. CHESTER was launched 3 July 1929, Frank Dengler’s father’s 18th birthday. e. Characteristics Upon Commissioning: Displacement 9,300 tons, Length: 600' 3", Beam: 66' 1", Draft: 16’ 4” to 23', Armament 9 x 8"/55 in 3 x turrets, 4 x 5"/25 gun mounts, 8 x M2 .50” (12.7mm) machineguns (MGs), 6 x 21" torpedo tubes, 4 Aircraft, Armor: 3 3/4" Belt, 2 ½” Turrets,1" Deck, 1 ¼” Conning Tower, Propulsion: 8 x White-Forster boilers, 4 x Parsons steam turbines, 4 screws, 107,000 SHP; Speed: 32.7 kts, Range 10,000 nm, Compliment: 574 (later 95 officers, 608 enlisted). Figure 1 - CHESTER in July 1931 in “as built” configuration. Note hanger around aft stack, trainable aircraft catapults port & starboard, & aircraft recovery crane amidships, extensive boat compliment and boat crane aft. -
Rebuilding the Ukrainian Navy
King’s Research Portal Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Sanders, D. L. (2017). Rebuilding the Ukrainian Navy. US Naval War College Review, 70(4), 61-78. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. -
December 2007 Crew Journal of the Barque James Craig
December 2007 Crew journal of the barque James Craig Full & By December 2007 Full & By The crew journal of the barque James Craig http://www.australianheritagefleet.com.au/JCraig/JCraig.html Compiled by Peter Davey [email protected] Production and photos by John Spiers All crew and others associated with the James Craig are very welcome to submit material. The opinions expressed in this journal may not necessarily be the viewpoint of the Sydney Maritime Museum, the Sydney Heritage Fleet or the crew of the James Craig or its officers. 2 December 2007 Full & By APEC parade of sail - Windeward Bound, New Endeavour, James Craig, Endeavour replica, One and All Full & By December 2007 December 2007 Full & By Full & By December 2007 December 2007 Full & By Full & By December 2007 7 Radio procedures on James Craig adio procedures being used onboard discomfort. Effective communication Rare from professional to appalling relies on message being concise and clear. - mostly on the appalling side. The radio Consider carefully what is to be said before intercoms are not mobile phones. beginning to transmit. Other operators may The ship, and the ship’s company are be waiting to use the network. judged by our appearance and our radio procedures. Remember you may have Some standard words and phases. to justify your transmission to a marine Affirm - Yes, or correct, or that is cor- court of inquiry. All radio transmissions rect. or I agree on VHF Port working frequencies are Negative - No, or this is incorrect or monitored and tape recorded by the Port Permission not granted. -
China's Logistics Capabilities for Expeditionary Operations
China’s Logistics Capabilities for Expeditionary Operations The modular transfer system between a Type 054A frigate and a COSCO container ship during China’s first military-civil UNREP. Source: “重大突破!民船为海军水面舰艇实施干货补给 [Breakthrough! Civil Ships Implement Dry Cargo Supply for Naval Surface Ships],” Guancha, November 15, 2019 Primary author: Chad Peltier Supporting analysts: Tate Nurkin and Sean O’Connor Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 113-291. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. 1 Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology, Scope, and Study Limitations ........................................................................................................ 6 1. China’s Expeditionary Operations -
Viper Owner's Manual.Pdf
Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 About this Owner’s Manual ......................................................................................................................................... 4 General Information .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Assembly ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Glossary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Tools needed ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 Arrival of goods ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Platform ......................................................................................................................................................................