DOCSLIB.ORG

Borders Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Borders Dissertation SUCCESSFUL INTELLIGENCE: PROPINQUITY, FRATERNITY, AND THE PRESIDENT-DCI RELATIONSHIP by LT COL JAMES B. BORDERS, USAF (Under the Direction of Loch K. Johnson) ABSTRACT Intelligence support is crucial to the development of good foreign policy. Considerable research within the field of intelligence studies focuses on intelligence processes, but this dissertation focuses on the interaction between the president and his chief intelligence advisor. The overlap of the president’s decision cycle and the intelligence cycle is the point where the relationship between these two individuals can have a significant effect upon the level of intelligence success they can experience. I hypothesize that the likelihood of intelligence success is improved when the president and chief of intelligence have a positive relationship, meet frequently, and the intelligence chief does not engage in the active advocacy of policy options. These hypotheses are tested in four case studies that review the interaction between a president and his chief of intelligence. I conclude that the relationship between these two individuals can explain the degree of intelligence success achieved by the pairing. INDEX WORDS: Intelligence, President, U. S. Foreign Policy, Central Intelligence Agency SUCCESSFUL INTELLIGENCE: PROPINQUITY, FRATERNITY, AND THE PRESIDENT-DCI RELATIONSHIP by LT COL JAMES B. BORDERS, USAF B.A., The Pennsylvania State University, 1992 M.S., The Joint Military Intelligence College, 1999 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2011 © 2011 Lt Col James B. Borders, USAF All Rights Reserved SUCCESSFUL INTELLIGENCE: PROPINQUITY, FRATERNITY, AND THE PRESIDENT-DCI RELATIONSHIP by LT COL JAMES B. BORDERS, USAF Major Professor: Loch K. Johnson Committee: Jeffrey Berejikian Fred Manget Brock Tessman Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia May 2011 DEDICATION A friend loves at all times, And a brother is born for adversity. (Proverbs 17:17). This is dedicated to my dear friends, my loving family, and the lady who is both, my loving wife, Martha. As pleased as I was to find that I was totally prepared for ninety percent of this program, I was blessed beyond measure by the encouragement provided by friends and family members and the faith they displayed in my ability to complete this task. My parents and my wife were always sound counsel and were instrumental in the editing process of this document, and my wife and children, Elizabeth, Andrew, and John, gave their constant love and support. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My entrance into this program occurred only with the faith and trust placed in me by Col. Douglas Murray, USAF and Col. Cheryl Kearny, USAF. Both of these individuals were instrumental in ensuring that I had this incredible opportunity and for that I am eternally grateful. Additionally, my ability to accomplish my goals here at the University of Georgia not have been possible without the help of all the dedicated faculty and staff at the School for Public and International Affairs. Particular thanks are due to Professor Loch Johnson, who encouraged and mentored me through this process and never doubted my ability to complete it. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................ix LIST OF TABLES.....................................................................................................................xi GLOSSARY...... .......................................................................................................................xii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1 1.1 Statement of the Puzzle..................................................................................1 1.2 Literature Review.........................................................................................14 1.3 Plan of Dissertation......................................................................................20 2 ROLE OF INTELLIGENCE IN GRAND STRATEGY...........................................27 2.1 Employment of Intelligence by Clausewitz, Jomini and Sun Tzu..................28 2.2 Debate of the Role of the Intelligence Community by Kent and Kendall ......42 2.3 Five Principles of Intelligence in Grand Strategy..........................................45 2.4 Application of the Principles of Intelligence in Grand Strategy ....................55 3 METHODOLOGY AND HYPOTHESES ...............................................................66 3.1 Selection and Ordering of Case Studies........................................................66 3.2 The Intelligence Process as a Guide .............................................................73 3.3 The Operational Code ..................................................................................75 3.4 Categorizing the President/DCI Relationship ...............................................86 vi 3.5 Grading Intelligence Success........................................................................91 3.6 Evaluating the Hypotheses ...........................................................................93 4 CASE STUDY: PRESIDENT CARTER AND DCI TURNER ...............................96 4.1 President James E. Carter (39th President, 1977-1981)..................................97 4.2 DCI Stanfield Turner (12th DCI, 1977-1981).............................................. 118 4.3 Assessment of the Carter/Turner Dyad....................................................... 139 5 CASE STUDY: PRESIDENT REAGAN AND DCI CASEY ............................... 153 5.1 President Ronald W. Reagan (40th President, 1981-1989)........................... 156 5.2 DCI William J. Casey (13th DCI, 1981-1987)............................................. 187 5.3 Assessment of the Reagan/Casey Dyad ...................................................... 217 6 CASE STUDY: PRESIDENT KENNEDY AND DCI McCONE.......................... 230 6.1 President John F. Kennedy (35th President, 1961-1963).............................. 231 6.2 DCI John A. McCone (6th DCI, 1961-1965)............................................... 258 6.3 Assessment of the Kennedy/McCone Dyad................................................ 271 7 CASE STUDY: PRESIDENT BUSH AND DCI TENET ..................................... 286 7.1 President George W. Bush (43rd President, 2000-2009).............................. 289 7.2 DCI George J. Tenet (18th DCI, 1997-2004)............................................... 321 7.3 Assessment of the Bush/Tenet Dyad .......................................................... 346 8 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION....................................................................... 362 8.1 Comparison of the Dyads........................................................................... 363 8.2 Reviewing the Results................................................................................ 364 8.3 Applying the Hypotheses ........................................................................... 369 8.4 Future Areas for Research.......................................................................... 378 vii 8.5 Conclusion................................................................................................. 381 WORKS CITED AND WORKS CONSULTED..................................................................... 384 APPENDICES A Directors of Central Intelligence Ordered by Duration ........................................... 409 B President/DCI (and DNI) Dyads Ordered by Duration ........................................... 410 C John Boyd’s Observe-Orient-Decide-Act (OODA) Loop....................................... 411 D National Security Action Memorandum Number 135 ............................................ 412 E Humane treatment of al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees ........................................... 413 F The CIA Counterterrorism Center.......................................................................... 415 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1: The Intelligence Process............................................................................................3 Figure 1.2: Integration of the OODA Loop and the Intelligence Process......................................8 Figure 1.3: Lowenthal’s Semi-Permeable Wall...........................................................................17 Figure 1.4: Flow Diagram of this Dissertation...........................................................................21 Figure 2.1: Information Focused Through the Lenses of Intelligence ........................................30 Figure 2.2: Intelligence Pyramid ...............................................................................................36 Figure 3.1: The Department of Defense Intelligence Process.....................................................74 Figure 3.2: President-DCI Relationship Matrix .........................................................................87 Figure 3.3: Chain Model of Intelligence Success.......................................................................94 Figure 4.1: An Intelligence Operational Code for President Jimmy Carter............................... 117 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of NYC”: The
    “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of N.Y.C.”: The Embodied Production of Urban Decline, Survival, and Renewal in New York’s Fiscal-Crisis-Era Streets, 1977-1983 by Elizabeth Healy Matassa B.A. in Italian and French Studies, May 2003, University of Delaware M.A. in Geography, May 2006, Louisiana State University A Dissertation submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 31, 2014 Dissertation directed by Suleiman Osman Associate Professor of American Studies The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of the George Washington University certifies that Elizabeth Healy Matassa has passed the Final Examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy as of August 21, 2013. This is the final and approved form of the dissertation. “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of N.Y.C.”: The Embodied Production of Decline, Survival, and Renewal in New York’s Fiscal-Crisis-Era Streets, 1977-1983 Elizabeth Healy Matassa Dissertation Research Committee: Suleiman Osman, Associate Professor of American Studies, Dissertation Director Elaine Peña, Associate Professor of American Studies, Committee Member Elizabeth Chacko, Associate Professor of Geography and International Affairs, Committee Member ii ©Copyright 2013 by Elizabeth Healy Matassa All rights reserved iii Dedication The author wishes to dedicate this dissertation to the five boroughs. From Woodlawn to the Rockaways: this one’s for you. iv Abstract of Dissertation “From the Cracks in the Sidewalks of N.Y.C.”: The Embodied Production of Urban Decline, Survival, and Renewal in New York’s Fiscal-Crisis-Era Streets, 1977-1983 This dissertation argues that New York City’s 1970s fiscal crisis was not only an economic crisis, but was also a spatial and embodied one.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to the Oral History of Rear Admiral Albert G
    Index to the Oral History of Rear Admiral Albert G. Mumma, U.S. Navy (Retired) Accidents In the late 1920s Lieutenant Richard Whitehead crashed an O2U on the deck of the aircraft carrier Saratoga (CV-3) when his tailhook caught the barrier wire, 28-29 Aircraft Carriers The effort in the 1950s and 1960s to justify nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, 190-191, 268-269; rejection in the late 1950s of a congressional effort to build an aircraft carrier in a West Coast shipyard, 200-202 Air Warfare The German Air Force used the ME 163 rocket-powered airplane against the Allies in World War II, 107, 116 Albacore, USS (AGSS-569) Experimental test vehicle used in the early 1950s to demonstrate the feasibility of the teardrop-shaped hull as the best hydrodynamic form for a true submarine, 150-151, 172 Alcohol In 1945, in Bremen, Germany, Mumma had to disarm an Army photographer who had gotten drunk and was brandishing a pistol, 111-112 Alsos Mission At the end of World War II, U.S. officers visited France and Germany to ascertain German technical developments during the war, 97, 101-105 See also: Naval Technical Mission Europe American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE) Professional society that contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field, 234-236 Andrea Doria (Passenger Liner) Italian ship that sank in July 1956 off Nantucket after colliding with the Swedish liner Stockholm, 222-224; a longitudinal bulkhead was probably a factor in the sinking, 223-224 Antisubmarine Warfare German U-boats were surprised during World War II by the effectiveness of American airborne radar, 117 1 Arkansas, USS (BB-33) Battleship that in the summer of 1923 made a midshipman training cruise to Europe, 7-9 Army, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979
    Distribution Agreement In presenting this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree from Emory University, I hereby grant to Emory University and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive, make accessible, and display my thesis in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter now, including display on the World Wide Web. I understand that I may select some access restrictions as part of the online submission of this thesis. I retain all ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis. Jay Schaefer April 10, 2018 Push and Pull: Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979 by Jay Schaefer Kenneth W. Stein Adviser History Kenneth W. Stein Adviser Joseph P. Crespino Committee Member Dan Reiter Committee Member 2018 Push and Pull: Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979 By Jay Schaefer Kenneth W. Stein Adviser An abstract of a thesis submitted to the Faculty of Emory College of Arts and Sciences of Emory University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors History 2018 Abstract Push and Pull: Carter Diplomacy in the Negotiations Between Egypt and Israel, October 1978- March 1979 By Jay Schaefer This thesis is a critical examination of President Jimmy Carter’s Middle East negotiating strategy between the signing of the Camp David Accords and the signing of the Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty.
    [Show full text]
  • Directors of Central Intelligence As Leaders of the U.S
    All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this book are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Central Intel- ligence Agency or any other US government entity, past or present. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying US government endorsement of the authors’ factual statements and interpretations. The Center for the Study of Intelligence The Center for the Study of Intelligence (CSI) was founded in 1974 in response to Director of Central Intelligence James Schlesinger’s desire to create within CIA an organization that could “think through the functions of intelligence and bring the best intellects available to bear on intelli- gence problems.” The Center, comprising professional historians and experienced practitioners, attempts to document lessons learned from past operations, explore the needs and expectations of intelligence consumers, and stimulate serious debate on current and future intelligence challenges. To support these activities, CSI publishes Studies in Intelligence and books and monographs addressing historical, operational, doctrinal, and theoretical aspects of the intelligence profession. It also administers the CIA Museum and maintains the Agency’s Historical Intelligence Collection. Comments and questions may be addressed to: Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Printed copies of this book are available to requesters outside the US government from: Government Printing Office (GPO) Superintendent of Documents P.O. Box 391954 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954 Phone: (202) 512-1800 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 1-929667-14-0 The covers: The portraits on the front and back covers are of the 19 directors of central intelligence, beginning with the first, RAdm.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern First Ladies: Their Documentary Legacy. INSTITUTION National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 412 562 CS 216 046 AUTHOR Smith, Nancy Kegan, Comp.; Ryan, Mary C., Comp. TITLE Modern First Ladies: Their Documentary Legacy. INSTITUTION National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC. ISBN ISBN-0-911333-73-8 PUB DATE 1989-00-00 NOTE 189p.; Foreword by Don W. Wilson (Archivist of the United States). Introduction and Afterword by Lewis L. Gould. Published for the National Archives Trust Fund Board. PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Archives; *Authors; *Females; Modern History; Presidents of the United States; Primary Sources; Resource Materials; Social History; *United States History IDENTIFIERS *First Ladies (United States); *Personal Writing; Public Records; Social Power; Twentieth Century; Womens History ABSTRACT This collection of essays about the Presidential wives of the 20th century through Nancy Reagan. An exploration of the records of first ladies will elicit diverse insights about the historical impact of these women in their times. Interpretive theories that explain modern first ladies are still tentative and exploratory. The contention in the essays, however, is that whatever direction historical writing on presidential wives may follow, there is little question that the future role of first ladies is more likely to expand than to recede to the days of relatively silent and passive helpmates. Following a foreword and an introduction, essays in the collection and their authors are, as follows: "Meeting a New Century: The Papers of Four Twentieth-Century First Ladies" (Mary M. Wolf skill); "Not One to Stay at Home: The Papers of Lou Henry Hoover" (Dale C.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Generals
    STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY - PERSPECTIVE Trump’s Generals: A Natural Experiment in Civil-Military Relations JAMES JOYNER Abstract President Donald Trump’s filling of numerous top policy positions with active and retired officers he called “my generals” generated fears of mili- tarization of foreign policy, loss of civilian control of the military, and politicization of the military—yet also hope that they might restrain his worst impulses. Because the generals were all gone by the halfway mark of his administration, we have a natural experiment that allows us to com- pare a Trump presidency with and without retired generals serving as “adults in the room.” None of the dire predictions turned out to be quite true. While Trump repeatedly flirted with civil- military crises, they were not significantly amplified or deterred by the presence of retired generals in key roles. Further, the pattern continued in the second half of the ad- ministration when “true” civilians filled these billets. Whether longer-term damage was done, however, remains unresolved. ***** he presidency of Donald Trump served as a natural experiment, testing many of the long- debated precepts of the civil-military relations (CMR) literature. His postelection interviewing of Tmore than a half dozen recently retired four- star officers for senior posts in his administration unleashed a torrent of columns pointing to the dangers of further militarization of US foreign policy and damage to the military as a nonpartisan institution. At the same time, many argued that these men were uniquely qualified to rein in Trump’s worst pro- clivities. With Trump’s tenure over, we can begin to evaluate these claims.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ben Shepperd, Jr. Memorial Library Catalog
    John Ben Shepperd, Jr. Memorial Library Catalog Author Other Authors Title Call Letter Call number Volume Closed shelf Notes Donated By In Memory Of (unkown) (unknown) history of the presidents for children E 176.1 .Un4 Closed shelf 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) Ruth Goree and Jane Brown 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) Anonymous 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) Bobbie Meadows Beulah Hodges 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) 1977 Inaugural Committee A New Spirit, A New Commitment, A New America F 200 .A17 (1977) 1981 Presidential Inaugural Committee (U.S.) A Great New Beginning: the 1981 Inaugural Story E 877.2 .G73 A Citizen of Western New York Bancroft, George Memoirs of General Andrew Jackson, Seventh President of the United States E 382 .M53 Closed shelf John Ben Shepperd A.P.F., Inc. A Catalogue of Frames, Fifteenth Century to Present N 8550 .A2 (1973) A.P.F. Inc. Aaron, Ira E. Carter, Sylvia Take a Bow PZ 8.9 .A135 Abbott, David W. Political Parties: Leadership, Organization, Linkage JK 2265 .A6 Abbott, John S.C. Conwell, Russell H. Lives of the Presidents of the United States of America E 176.1 .A249 Closed shelf Ector County Library Abbott, John S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School REMEMBERING JIMMY CARTER THE RHETORICAL EVOCATIONS OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIES A Thesis in Communication Arts and Sciences by Brandon M. Johnson 2020 Brandon M. Johnson Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2020 The thesis of Brandon M. Johnson was reviewed and approved by the following: Mary E. Stuckey Professor, Communication Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Stephen H. Browne Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Michael J. Steudeman Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Director of CAS100A Denise H. Solomon Head and Liberal Arts Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT This thesis is an analysis of the public memory of Jimmy Carter and the way the historical resources of his presidency (including his perceived moral character) are interpreted and evoked as a shorthand for presidential failure by associating him with a rhetoric of weakness. Broadly, I consider the nature of presidential memory, asking how a presidency passes from history to memory. I suggest that presidential histories serve as inventional resources in the present, with rhetors evoking interpretations of the past as rhetorical appeals. These appeals are acts of memory, and analyzing how they function discursively and are deployed strategically draws out how presidential memory works and what implications it has to presidential rhetoric. The different strategies used in remembering the presidency of Jimmy Carter are useful texts for rhetorically critiquing this process because Carter is often deployed as a rhetorical shorthand, providing a representative example of interpreting presidential pasts. I begin by considering the evolving scholarship and historiography on Carter and conceptualizing how presidential pasts can be interpreted in the present through acts of remembering.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp David's Shadow
    Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Seth Anziska All rights reserved ABSTRACT Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska This dissertation examines the emergence of the 1978 Camp David Accords and the consequences for Israel, the Palestinians, and the wider Middle East. Utilizing archival sources and oral history interviews from across Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, the United States, and the United Kingdom, Camp David’s Shadow recasts the early history of the peace process. It explains how a comprehensive settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict with provisions for a resolution of the Palestinian question gave way to the facilitation of bilateral peace between Egypt and Israel. As recently declassified sources reveal, the completion of the Camp David Accords—via intensive American efforts— actually enabled Israeli expansion across the Green Line, undermining the possibility of Palestinian sovereignty in the occupied territories. By examining how both the concept and diplomatic practice of autonomy were utilized to address the Palestinian question, and the implications of the subsequent Israeli and U.S. military intervention in Lebanon, the dissertation explains how and why the Camp David process and its aftermath adversely shaped the prospects of a negotiated settlement between Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s. In linking the developments of the late 1970s and 1980s with the Madrid Conference and Oslo Accords in the decade that followed, the dissertation charts the role played by American, Middle Eastern, international, and domestic actors in curtailing the possibility of Palestinian self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Armies and Influence: Public Deference to Foreign Policy Elites
    Armies and Influence: Public Deference to Foreign Policy Elites Tyler Jost⇤ and Joshua D. Kertzer† Last modified: January 20, 2021 Abstract: When is the public more likely to defer to elites on foreign policy? Existing research suggests the public takes its cues from co-partisans, but what happens when co-partisans disagree? Drawing on research on the social origins of trust, we argue that the public prioritizes information from elites who signal expertise through prior experience. However, di↵ering social standing of government institutions means the public values some types of experience more than others, even when the experience lies outside the policy domain of the cue. Using a conjoint experiment, we show that the American public defers to cue-givers with experience — but that it is especially deferential towards military experience, even on non-military issues. We replicate our findings in a second conjoint experiment showing that the same dynamics hold when considering partisan candidates for cabinet positions. The results have important implications for the study of public opinion, bureaucratic politics, and civil-military relations. ⇤Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Brown University. Email: tyler [email protected]: http://www.tylerjost.com †Professor of Government, Department of Government, Harvard University. 1737 Cambridge St, Cambridge MA 02138. Email: [email protected]:http://people.fas.harvard.edu/˜jkertzer/ In January 2017, three nominees for senior positions in the Trump administration — James Mattis, Rex Tillerson, and Mike Pompeo — publicly testified before Congress. On issues ranging from the Iran deal, to the ban on immigrants from a set of Muslim-majority countries, to US defense policy toward Russia, the nominees o↵ered policy assessments and recommendations that not only di↵ered from President Trump, but also from one another.1 Long after these confirmation hearings ended, commentators continue to note that the Trump cabinet has been filled with an array of dissenting voices.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Access/Area-Denial (A2/AD)
    C en t er f o R S t ra t egic and B udge t ary A ssessmen t S Outside-In Operating from Range to Defeat Iran’s Anti-Access and Area-Denial Threats BY MARK GUNZINGER With Chris Dougherty Outside-in: Operating frOm range tO defeat iran’s anti-access and area-denial threats BY MARK GUNZINGER With Chris Dougherty 2011 © 2011 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. All rights reserved. about the center for strategic and Budgetary assessments The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA) is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy and resource allocation. CSBA provides timely, impartial and insightful analyses to senior decision mak- ers in the executive and legislative branches, as well as to the media and the broader national security community. CSBA encourages thoughtful participation in the de- velopment of national security strategy and policy, and in the allocation of scarce human and capital resources. CSBA’s analysis and outreach focus on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security. Meeting these challenges will require transforming the national security establishment, and we are devoted to helping achieve this end. about the authors Mark Gunzinger is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Mr. Gunzinger has served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Forces Transformation and Resources. He is the principal author or co-author of multi- ple Defense Planning Guidance directives, key strategic planning guidance documents that shape DoD force planning.
    [Show full text]
  • It Seemed Like I Was Unusually Qualified for This
    LIZ: Please wait just one moment. I’m LIZ: And it is an honor for us to be recording this on two devices and want working with you! It’s also interesting to turn both of them on… how different this play is from Cleo. What was the spark for Camp David? LAWRENCE: You’re doing the best practices of journalism, Liz, with the LAWRENCE: I got a call when I was in redundancy. a cab in New York City from Gerald Rafshoon, who was Jimmy Carter’s LIZ: Well, thank you, Larry. It is great to media advisor when he was in the hear that from you as I was just about White House and also when he was to say that I interview playwrights Governor of Georgia, and he asked frequently, but it’s a bit intimidating “Would you be interested in writing a interviewing you knowing that you are play about Camp David?” The truth is, a Pulitzer Prize-winning interviewer of I had never talked to Jerry Rafshoon other people, so I’m glad I’m doing well before and he caught me totally by so far. surprise. It was great working with you on Cleo But I began to consider the fact that I two seasons ago, and we look forward had lived in Georgia when Carter was to having you back here at the Alley for governor. I had lived in Egypt when Camp David! This will be your second Anwar Sadat became president after production with us and I love that you Gamal Abdel Nasser’s death, and I had can just drive over from Austin.
    [Show full text]