Cases Heard by the Commission During 2018-2019
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
CASES HEARD BY THE COMMISSION DURING 2018-2019 S. File No., Name, Address of the Brief of the case Decision of the Commission in the hearing No. Petitioner Date of hearing 1. F.No. S/HR/319/2/2018 The Commission took cognizance of the The Commission after hearing both the parties and going representation dated nil of Shri Lakhwinder through the report of DSP, Kurushetra, is of the view that Shri Lakhwinder Pall Singh Pal Singh regarding capturing of land by there is no proof of any action by the police which is against S/o Shri Santhok Singh some anti-social elements and non-action by the religious sentiment of the petitioner. Further, the issue is H.No. 951- Sector-13 police. sub-judice and hence Commission has no power to Kurukshetra intervene in it. Haryana In view of this, the case is closed in the Commission. Date of hearing : 10.4.2018 2. F.No: M/UP/701/102/2018 Commission gave direction to Shri Asha Ram, Deputy The Commission took cognizance of the Shri Syed Rafakat Husain, Collector, Azamgarh, to remove entire encroachment and representation dated 12.11.2017 of Shri Syed Secretary, Qabristan Tahaffuz construct boundary wall to secure the land in question. Rafakat Husain, P.O Malgaon, Tehsil Committee, The Commission also directed the Respondent to take Phoolpur, Dist. Azamgarh regarding illegal Village and P.O Malgaon, Police assistance in eviction process and further directed encroachment of graveyard land. Tehsil Phoolpur, the Respondent to initiate proceeding u/s 207, 297 IPC Dist. Azamgarh, against Ms. Kaisri Bano in case she tries to trespass again Uttar Pradesh. on land in question. The Petitioner was also directed to assist the District Authorities in this regard. Date of hearing : 9.5.2018, 12.7.2018 & 9.8.2018 3. F.No: M/DL/319/33/2018 The Commission took cognizance of the The Commission have heard submissions made by both representation dated 16.03.2018 of Shri parties and is to the view that the Petitioner failed to provide Shri Mohd . Sher Nabi Chaman, Mohd Sher Nabi Chaman regarding records of the case. Further, since the matter is sub-judice Block-F-1, F-2, harassment and non-cooperation to before the Court, the Commission cannot intervene in the Chaman Estate, demarcate the land of the petitioner by SDM petition filed by the petitioner. Sunder Nagri, Delhi. Seemapuri . In view of the aforesaid, the petition is hereby dismissed. Date of hearing : 9.5.2018 4. F.No. B/DL/319/50/2018 The NCM have taken cognizance of the It was submitted by respondent that government authorities complaint filed by Petitioner vide are taking due action on unauthorised construction. Further, Shri J.R.Nirala, Chairman representation dated 19.04.2018 wherein the it was advised by the Respondent that the Petitioner may Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar Community Petitioner alleged that Shri Mohan Lal Gupta approach concerned SDM under section 145 of Criminal Centre, Vikas Committee, D-535, who lives near Buddh Vihar has illegally Procedure Code (CRPC) as well as Section 133 of CRPC to West Vinod Nagar, encroached the Buddh Vihar land belonging take action against encroacher. The Respondent assured the Siddharth Buddh Vihar, to Petitioner’s organisation and have built Commission that action will be taken against the encroacher Delhi-110092. five storey building illegally. No action has as per law. The petitioner agreed to approach the concerned been taken by DC, Shahdra South Zone even SDM under aforesaid section. Date of Hearing : 10.5.2018 & after recommendation of SDM, Preet Vihar, 12.07.2018 In view of the above, the petition is hereby disposed off. New Delhi. 5. F.No: C/KL/319/6/2018 In view of the serious nature of crime against the Petitioner, The Commission took cognizance of the the Commission directed the Respondent: representation dated 20.02.2018 of Mrs Smt. Jolsna Sibi, W/o Sibi,R/o 1) To submit copy of the charge sheet against the Jolsana Sibi. The petitioner alleged that on Thenamkuzhiyil House, accused within 10 days from the date of hearing. 28.01.2018 few persons trespassed into Po- Velamcode,Kozhikode, 2) Charges under Section 307 relating to Attempt to petitioner’s house with deadly weapons and District Calicut, Kerala. Murder should be included in the FIR & charge physically assaulted the petitioner. Due to sheet against the accused. this, her unborn baby died. Petitioner, her Date of hearing : 10.5.2018 3) To investigate and submit report on continuous husband and daughter were admitted to threats issued by Accused against the petitioner. hospital for 5 days. 4) To provide adequate security to the petitioner and her family. 5) To provide monthly action taken report for a period of one year from the date of hearing. 6) Recommend State govt. to provide Financial Aid amounting to INR 10 lacs to the petitioner. 7) Recommend State Govt. to set up fast track court and appoint special Prosecutor for deciding Petitioner’s case against the Accused Persons in a quick time. 6. F.No: M/RJ/801/7/2018 The Commission took cognizance of the The Commission have heard submissions made by both representation dated 4.3.2016 submitted by parties and is to the view that Petitioner is unable to Shri Munna Ahmed, stating that he publishes understand the notice served by Municipal Corporation and Shri Munna Ahmed, 374/27 a fortnightly Magazine but Ajmer Municipal directed the Petitioner to submit sanctioned Plans and Title Asha Gunj, Ajmer, Corporation harassed him and served a of aforementioned property to the Municipal Corporation. Rajasthan notice stating that Newspaper is published Commission further directed the Respondent that if the from the office without sanction plan. property of construction is found unauthorised or illegal, they may take action as per law. In view of this, the petition Date of hearing : 13.6.2018 is dismissed. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is hereby dismissed. 7. F.No. : M/GJ/102/20/2017 The Commission took cognizance of the The Commission have heard submissions made by both representation dated 18.8.2017 of Shri parties and gave direction to both the parties to resolve their Shri Anwar Ahmed Qadri, Anwar Ahmed Qadri regarding dispute in amicable manner. On the request of the Plot No-7 & 8 GIDC Mini Estate encroachment of his , G.I.D.C. allotted plot Petitioner, the Respondent agreed to look into the issues of ( Near New Mamlatdar office) No-7 & 8 by the Gram Panchayat Vagra and harassment, if any, and also assured that no damage will be AT& PO : Vagra-392/40, construction of small huts for halpaties. made to the petitioner’s plot or land. District Bharuch, In view of the aforesaid, the Petition is hereby dismissed. Gujarat. Date of hearing : 13.06.2018 8. F.No: B/UP/319/45/2017 Respondents’ representative Shri V.K.Singh, OSD, GDA, The Commission took cognizance of the submitted before the Commission that notice was issued to representation dated 15.01.2017 of Boudh Boudh Bhikshu Mahanam Thera, remove the encroachment from Chaudhary Samay Singh Bhikshu Mahanam Thera. alleging that the Village Hasanpur Bhowapur, Market which is unauthorised and illegal and not to Budh GDA has issued the notice to demolish the (ChaudharySamay Singh Market), Vihar Temple. Maha Karuna Budh Vihar whereas in that Near P.A.C. Gate No.1, Main Link The Commission directed the Respondent to issue official particular area there are various temples and Road, Tehsil & District Ghaziabad, letter to the Commission and send a copy of the letter to the mosques but GDA has only issued notice to Uttar Pradesh Petitioner clarifying that no notice of demolition has issued them and they are facing discrimination on by Respondent to Maha Karuna Budh Vihar. The the basis of religion. Date of Hearing : 14.6.2018 & proceedings are hereby disposed off. 12.07.2018 9. F.No: M/UP/705/343/2017 The Commission recommended Police officials to add The Commission took cognizance of the charges u/s 505C, 505B and u/s 153A of IPC in the charge representation dated 04.08.2017 of Shri S.S Mr. S. S Shaukat Abidi, Chairman, sheet. Further, charges in regard to violation of The Places Shaukat Abdi alleging that 200 years old Asar Foundation, 50 Dariyabad, of worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 shall also be Imambada was illegally demolished by land Allahabad, added in the aforesaid charge sheet. Further action should mafias in connivance with administration. Uttar Pradesh be taken against Mutawali of Shia Waqf Board and other officials for conspiring and demolishing the 20 year old Date of Hearing : 11.07.2018 Imambada. Action Taken Report may be submitted to the Commission. The proceedings is hereby kept in abeyance 10. F.No.C/MH/319/54/2016 The Commission took cognizance of the The Commission have heard submissions made by both representation dated 19.4.2016 of Shri Jude parties. It was informed by the Respondent that the Sh Jude D’Souza, Dilkush Terrace D’Souza regarding harassment of his wife Petitioner has another opportunity to appeal further to 1st Floor 5A, Dr Peter Dias Road, by the Dena Bank zonal office Mumbai. Reviewing authority as per the Rules and Regulations of the Bandram Mumbai 400050 Though the Dena Bank revoked suspension Bank. Commission directed the petitioner to avail the same of Ms Celine D’ Souza however, dues for and directed to Bank to dispose off the matter within 45 the period of suspension were not paid. days after receipt of the application for review from the Date of hearing : 11.7.2018 & Petitioner and submit the report of the same to the 10.10.2018 Commission.