Excavating Greece: Classicism Between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Excavating Greece: Classicism Between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe Nina Athanassoglou-Kallmyer Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7, no. 2 (Autumn 2008) Citation: Nina Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, “Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe,” Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7, no. 2 (Autumn 2008), http://www.19thc-artworldwide.org/autumn08/94-excavating-greece-classicism- between-empire-and-nation-in-nineteenth-century-europe. Published by: Association of Historians of Nineteenth-Century Art Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. ©2008 Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide Athanassoglou-Kallmyer: Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7, no. 2 (Autumn 2008) Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe by Nina Athanassoglou-Kallmyer Puvis de Chavannes’s pendant murals Massilia, Greek Colony and Marseille, Gateway to the Orient, created in 1869 for the grand staircase of the Museum of Fine Arts, in Marseille, succinctly capture key European perceptions of the period about Greece, ancient and modern (figs. 1, 2). Massilia, Greek Colony, shows the civic ancestor to modern Marseille, the Greek colony of Massilia established in Gaul by the Phoceans, as a primitive Arcadia, its inhabitants portrayed under a dual identity, both as the original Greek founders of the port- city and as the forefathers of the French. Marseille, Gateway to the Orient presses the point further. The ancient Greeks’ traditional sea-faring role is now re-attributed to modern Frenchmen, whose ship sails into the harbor of Second Empire Marseille. The Greeks have disappeared, with the exception of a modern Greek Orthodox priest with long beard and characteristic black cassock and headdress, hunched among the exotic cargo, animate and inanimate, brought back home from France’s colonial empire. Roles have been reversed, identities have been switched: the French now rule the seas as the worthy heirs of the Greeks of yore; while the Greeks, once the mighty builders of civilizations, are shown as mere subject people, as alien and extrinsic to Europe as any of the colorful medley of Orientals on board. Hailed as the national, all-French painter of his day, Puvis conceived his mural as a flattering icon of France as a world power, the ruler of Oriental nations and a controlling force over the Mediterranean, described as a “lac français” by Napoleon III and as “a Gallic sea” by Puvis himself: “The city, seen from the sea, unravels in the horizon. Its ports open up to the ships that dash toward it. One of them, cut in half by the frame, forms the foreground. On the deck of the ship, [are] all the types representing the various races of the Levant. An Armenian, a Jew, a Greek, an Arab … seated or leaning against the railings, they contemplate the sea of the Gaules. It is Marseille, Gateway to the Orient.”[1] The frescoes were completed in August 1869, only a few months before the official opening of the Suez canal (on November 17, 1869), a major French engineering and geopolitical breakthrough that sanctioned France’s maritime and imperialist pre-eminence in the competition with England. Marseille, re-built to rival Paris in magnificence, acquired a commanding position as the prime Mediterranean gateway to Europe’s oriental colonial possessions. To mark France’s international prestige, Puvis chose to allude to ancient Greece, especially to ancient Greece as a colonial power revived in modern France as a global imperial force. The two scenes suggest superimposed temporal strata, the classical past of the French city, its chronological remoteness suggested in its ghostly pictorial handling, and its modern reincarnation, vibrant with a sense of instantaneous movement and vivid color. 2 Athanassoglou-Kallmyer: Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7, no. 2 (Autumn 2008) Fig. 1, Puvis de Chavannes, Massilia. Greek Colony, 1869. Marseille, Palais Longchamp. [larger image] Fig. 2, Puvis de Chavannes, Marseille. Gateway to the Orient, 1869. Marseille, Palais Longchamp. [larger image] Puvis’s murals usher in the main theme of this article: the emergence, in the second half of the nineteenth-century, of a new strand of classicism engaged with the period’s European imperialist forays in the Mediterranean region. In the wake of Greek independence and the creation of an independent Greek nation-state in 1830, the discourse such forays engendered went beyond the abstract appropriations of Hellenism that had haunted the Western European imaginary for centuries.[2] (“We are all Greeks. Our laws, our literature, our religion, our arts, have their root in Greece,” wrote Shelley, enflamed with philhellenic enthusiasm, in the preface to his play Hellas (1821).[3] In this high era of European colonialism, we must regard allusions to Greece and Hellenism as concretely entwined with notions of imperial expansion (and the resistance to it). At stake was no less than the construction of national identities, both on the part of the foreign nations and of Greece itself,[4] spurred by antithetical notions of nationalism—a “nationalism of power” for the former, as opposed to a “nationalism of survival” for the latter, to use the terms of the historian Dominique Borne.[5] Within that volatile historical frame, I explore how visual images, in tandem with a politicized cultural discourse, articulated anew the foundational myth of classical origins as shaped by the concrete realities of colonial appropriation of the Mediterranean lands, especially the newly accessible Greek territories.[6] They did so largely, as I show, through the means of archaeology, a soaring discipline at the time and one typically perceived as detached from contemporary and worldly preoccupations, thereby validating yet again Edward Said’s time-tested statement “that there is no discipline, no 3 Athanassoglou-Kallmyer: Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7, no. 2 (Autumn 2008) structure of knowledge, no institution or epistemology that can or has ever stood free of the various sociocultural, historical, and political formations that give epochs their peculiar individuality.”[7] Although freed from Ottoman rule since 1828, Greece in the nineteenth century was no longer the glamorous land of ancient times. Its territory diminished, its resources depleted by decades of war, its population transformed by centuries of Ottoman occupation, Greece was a cultural and political space of great ambiguity, “forever situated in the interstices between East and West,” in the words of the historian Stathis Gourgouris.[8] Although in principle an independent nation, the fledgling state was in reality only a protectorate of the allied Powers—France, England, Prussia, and Russia—that had contributed to its liberation from Turkish rule. In 1832, the Powers appointed Greece’s first king, Otto von Wittelsbach, second son to King Ludwig I of Bavaria, a passionate lover of classical Greece. The young king arrived in Greece in 1833 accompanied by an extensive court and staff, including three Bavarian viceroys, a Bavarian army, and a host of Bavarian bureaucrats. Bavarian rule— which lasted for three decades—was no less than tyrannical, and it seemed that the Greeks had only exchanged one repressive regime for another. Greek nationalism soared. Libertarian uprisings proliferated in towns and countryside triggering bloody reprisals on the part of the Bavarian armed forces, as depicted by an eyewitness, the amateur artist Ludwig Köllnberger (?-1892), a lieutenant in King Otto’s guard who was stationed in Greece from 1833 to 1838 (fig. 3).[9] The guillotine, a punitive instrument unknown to Greece till then, was introduced in 1834, courtesy of France, and first used for the public execution of a Greek chieftain, a revered veteran of the liberation wars. Such acts of brutality did little to endear foreign, especially Bavarian, presence to the Greeks.[10] We read in the Greek newspaper Dimokritos of October 9, 1851: Fig. 3, Köllnberger, Bavarian Troops against Greek Insurgents, 1909. Watercolor copy from original by Hans Hanke. Athens, National Historical Museum. [larger image] One is filled with horror and indignation when one hears about the tortures and wounds which are being inflicted on honest and peace-loving citizens by government officers … one must be similar to a wild beast or a senseless stone in order not to be swayed by compassion, not to shed tears at such accounts by citizens monstrously tortured and repressed…[11] 4 Athanassoglou-Kallmyer: Excavating Greece: Classicism between Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 7, no. 2 (Autumn 2008) In 1862, Otto finally abdicated under pressure from nationwide unrest and returned to Munich, only to be replaced a year later by another foreign king appointed by the Powers, a member of the Danish dynasty of Glücksburg, who ascended the Greek throne as King George I. Foreign control of Greece’s territory went hand-in-hand with foreign-spurred efforts to disenfranchise its troublesome modern population. Reflecting the period’s perceptions of the rise and decline of civilizations, the common view regarding the modern Greeks was one of decline and degeneration from their famous ancestors. Travelers to Greece repeatedly pointed out the physical and cultural discrepancies that separated the modern Greeks— rough in looks, crude in manners, and uneducated—from the European ideal of the noble and handsome Hellene of whom, ever since Winckelmann, the Apollo of Belvedere stood as the exemplar.[12] To listen to Edmond About, writer, art critic and a trained archaeologist who spent two years in Athens in 1882-83: The beauty of the Greek race has so been touted and travelers to Greece so firmly expect to find the family of the Venus of Melos there, that when they arrive in Athens they think that someone has been pulling their leg.
Recommended publications
  • Hamilakis Nation and Its Ruins.Pdf
    CLASSICAL PRESENCES General Editors Lorna Hardwick James I. Porter CLASSICAL PRESENCES The texts, ideas, images, and material culture of ancient Greece and Rome have always been crucial to attempts to appropriate the past in order to authenticate the present. They underlie the mapping of change and the assertion and challenging of values and identities, old and new. Classical Presences brings the latest scholarship to bear on the contexts, theory, and practice of such use, and abuse, of the classical past. The Nation and its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece YANNIS HAMILAKIS 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Yannis Hamilakis 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Review/La Revue Historique
    The Historical Review/La Revue Historique Vol. 16, 2019 Roots ancient or medieval? Nikolaos Politis, modern Greek folklore studies and ancient Greek religion Marinis Agis https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.22824 Copyright © 2020 Agis Marinis To cite this article: Marinis, A. (2020). Roots ancient or medieval? Nikolaos Politis, modern Greek folklore studies and ancient Greek religion. The Historical Review/La Revue Historique, 16, 167-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/hr.22824 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 26/09/2021 16:45:09 | ROOTS ANCIENT OR MEDIEVAL? NIKOLAOS POLITIS, MODERN GREEK FOLKLORE STUDIES AND ANCIENT GREEK RELIGION Agis Marinis Abstract: The question posed by the title can be reformulated in the following manner: to what extent has it been possible or desirable to connect modern Greek customs with ancient ones? Not customs in general, but more precisely religious customs. Greek folklore studies typically begin with Nikolaos Politis, professor at the University of Athens, the first to introduce the term λαογραφία (meaning “folklore studies”) towards the end of the nineteenth century. Yet, we need to revert to at least as far back as the time prior to the Greek Revolution, that is, the period of the Greek Enlightenment, in order to trace the beginnings of the shaping of the ideological framework of modern Greek folklore studies. It is well known and has aptly been pointed out, also in connection with Greek folklore studies, that for the Greeks the Enlightenment movement went hand in hand with a specific form of romanticism. The Greek idea of the nation developed within the framework of the Romantic movement and on the basis of the connection between “us” and “the ancients”.
    [Show full text]
  • 200Th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence 1821-2021 18 1821-2021
    Special Edition: 200th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence 1821-2021 18 1821-2021 A publication of the Dean C. and Zoë S. Pappas Interdisciplinary March 2021 VOLUME 1 ISSUE NO. 3 Center for Hellenic Studies and the Friends of Hellenic Studies From the Director Dear Friends, On March 25, 1821, in the city of Kalamata in the southern Peloponnesos, the chieftains from the region of Mani convened the Messinian Senate of Kalamata to issue a revolutionary proclamation for “Liberty.” The commander Petrobey Mavromichalis then wrote the following appeal to the Americans: “Citizens of the United States of America!…Having formed the resolution to live or die for freedom, we are drawn toward you by a just sympathy; since it is in your land that Liberty has fixed her abode, and by you that she is prized as by our fathers.” He added, “It is for you, citizens of America, to crown this glory, in aiding us to purge Greece from the barbarians, who for four hundred years have polluted the soil.” The Greek revolutionaries understood themselves as part of a universal struggle for freedom. It is this universal struggle for freedom that the Pappas Center for Hellenic Studies and Stockton University raises up and celebrates on the occasion of the 200th anniversary of the beginning of the Greek Revolution in 1821. The Pappas Center IN THIS ISSUE for Hellenic Studies and the Friends of Hellenic Studies have prepared this Special Edition of the Hellenic Voice for you to enjoy. In this Special Edition, we feature the Pappas Center exhibition, The Greek Pg.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Semiotics of the Imagery of the Greek War of Independence. from Delacroix to the Frieze in Otto’S Palace, the Current Hellenic Parliament”
    American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science (ARJHSS)R) 2020 American Research Journal of Humanities & Social Science (ARJHSS) E-ISSN: 2378-702X Volume-03, Issue-01, pp 36-41 January-2020 www.arjhss.com Research Paper Open Access “The Semiotics of the Imagery of the Greek War of Independence. From Delacroix to the Frieze in Otto’s Palace, The Current Hellenic Parliament”. Markella-Elpida Tsichla University of Patras *Corresponding Author: Markella-Elpida Tsichla ABSTRACT:- The iconography of the Greek War of Independence is quite broad and it includes both real and imaginary themes. Artists who were inspired by this particular and extremely important historical event originated from a variety of countries, some were already well-known, such as Eugène Delacroix, others were executing official commissions from kings of Western countries, and most of them were driven by the spirit of romanticism. This paper shall not so much focus on matters of art criticism, but rather explore the manner in which facts have been represented in specific works of art, referring to political, religious and cultural issues, which are still relevant to this day. In particular, I shall comment on The Massacre at Chios by Eugène Delacroix, painted in 1824, the 39 Scenes from the Greek War of Independence by Peter von Hess, painted in 1835 and commissioned by King Ludwig I of Bavaria, and the frieze in the Trophy Room (currently Eleftherios Venizelos Hall) in Otto’s palace in Athens, currently housing the Hellenic Parliament, themed around the Greek War of Independence and the subsequent events. This great work was designed by German sculptor Ludwig Michael Schantahaler in 1840 and “transferred” to the walls of the hall by a group of Greek and German artists.
    [Show full text]
  • «Τα Εργα Των Ιταλων Ζωγραφων Lipparini Kai Marsigli Στα
    ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ ΦΙΛΟΣΟΦΙΚΗ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΙΤΑΛΙΚΗΣ ΓΛΩΣΣΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΦΙΛΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ ΠΡΟΓΡΑΜΜΑ ΜΕΤΑΠΤΥΧΙΑΚΩΝ ΣΠΟΥΔΩΝ ΚΑΤΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ ΛΟΓΟΤΕΧΝΙΑ ΚΑΙ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΣΜΟΣ «ΤΑ ΕΡΓΑ ΤΩΝ ΙΤΑΛΩΝ ΖΩΓΡΑΦΩΝ LIPPARINI KAI MARSIGLI ΣΤΑ ΠΛΑΙΣΙΑ ΤΟΥ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΙΚΟΥ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ ΚΑΤΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΠΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΗ ΤΟΥ 1821» ΜΕΤΑΠΤΥΧΙΑΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ Στυλιανής Α. Μπίκα A.E.M. 12 ΕΠΙΒΛΕΠΟΥΣΑ: Ε. ΜΕΛΕΖΙΑΔΟΥ - ΔΟΜΠΟΥΛΑ Τριμελής Επιτροπή: E. Μελεζιάδου-Δομπούλα Eπίκουρη καθηγήτρια Α.Π.Θ. Β.Κ. Ιβάνοβιτς Αναπληρωτής καθηγητής Α.Π.Θ. G. Macrì Αναπληρώτρια καθηγήτρια Α.Π.Θ. ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗ 2012 0 Στην Άννα, στον Αλέξιο και στο Δανιήλ 1 ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΩΝ 1.Εισαγωγή σ. 4 2.Ο Ευρωπαϊκός φιλελληνισμός σ. 6 3.Ο φιλελληνισμός και η Ελληνική επανάσταση σ. 7 4.Οι πρώτες φιλελληνικές εκδηλώσεις σ. 9 5.Η φιλελληνική δραστηριότητα στη Γερμανία σ. 12 6.Ο φιλελληνισμός στη Γαλλία & η ίδρυση της πρώτης φιλελληνικής επιτροπής σ. 14 7.Η φιλελληνική κίνηση στη Μεγάλη Βρετανία σ. 18 7.1. H Mεγάλη Περιήγηση και η σχέση της με το φιλελληνικό κίνημα σ. 19 8.Ρώσοι φιλέλληνες κατά την επανάσταση του 1821 σ. 21 8.1. Ο Pushkin, οι Δεκεμβριστές και το Ελληνικό Ζήτημα σ. 24 9.Ο Ιταλικός φιλελληνισμός σ. 28 9.1. Ιταλοί φιλέλληνες και στελέχωση του τακτικού στρατού στην Ελλάδα. Συμμετοχή σε στρατιωτικές επιχειρήσεις. σ. 29 9.2. Συμμετοχή στην πολιτική συγκρότηση του νεοσύστατου κράτους σ. 32 9.3. Συμβολή στην έκδοση εφημερίδων σ. 33 9.4. Συμπαράσταση στην οργάνωση και διεύθυνση της ιατρικής, φαρμακευτικής και νοσοκομειακής περίθαλψης ασθενών και τραυματιών σ. 34 10.Ο πνευματικός κόσμος της Ιταλίας σ. 35 2 10.1. Λογοτέχνες και επαναστατικές ιδέες σ. 35 10.2. Πολιτικοί και επανάσταση σ.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries
    In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts Stephen L. Dyson In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS NEW HAVEN & LONDON Copyright © 2006 by Yale University. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Set in Linotype Fairfi eld by Duke & Company, Devon, Pennsylvania. Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dyson, Stephen L. In pursuit of ancient pasts : a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries / Stephen L. Dyson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-300-11097-5 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-300-11097-9 (alk. paper) 1. Archaeology—History—19th century. 2. Archaeology—History—20th century. 3. Classical antiquities. 4. Archaeology and history—Mediterranean Region. 5. Mediterranean Region—Antiquities. I. Title. CC100.D97 2006 930.1—dc22 2006017553 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Abigail Daniel Jacob Jonathan Peter Simona Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xv Chapter 1. The Protohistory of Classical Archaeology 1 Chapter 2. The Foundations of Classical Archaeology 20 Chapter 3.
    [Show full text]
  • ART CENTERS and PERIPHERAL ART [A LECTURE at the UNIVERSITY of HAMBURG, OCTOBER 15, 1982] Nicos Hadjinicolaou
    DOCUMENT Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/artm/article-pdf/9/2/119/1846574/artm_a_00267.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 ART CENTERS AND PERIPHERAL ART [A LECTURE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG, OCTOBER 15, 1982] nicos hadjinicolaou The title of my talk is “Art Centers and Peripheral Art.” The subject to which I have assigned this title touches several aspects of our discipline. I would briefl y like to raise several questions which have led me to the discussion of this topic. 1. Naturally, the most important, most complicated question for us art historians, but I believe also for historians in general—a problem, by the way, which we shall never “solve,” but answer differently depend- ing on our points of view—is the following: how and why does form change?1 Which available tools or means make it possible for art histori- ans to capture these changes? I think that the point I am hinting at here with “art centers and peripheral art” touches on this question: in the relationship of center and periphery, in the effect of an art center, and in the dissemination of its production to the periphery. In inundating and overpowering the art production of the periphery, the history of art is also being made.2 1 This has been, no doubt, the central question at least of German-language art history since the end of the 19th century (Heinrich Wölffl in, August Schmarsow, Alois Riegl). 2 This, too, cannot be emphasized enough. The history of art is created from (among other factors) the (unequal) interrelationship of periphery and center.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of Greece, Egypt and Constantinople, Circa 1853-1857
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt809nf7gk No online items Finding Aid for Views of Greece, Egypt and Constantinople, circa 1853-1857 Finding aid prepared by Ann Harrison. Finding Aid for Views of Greece, 2001.R.1 1 Egypt and Constantinople, circa 1853-1857 ... Descriptive Summary Title: Views of Greece, Egypt and Constantinople Date (inclusive): circa 1853-1857 Number: 2001.R.1 Creator/Collector: Robertson, James, 1813-1888 Physical Description: 5.3 linear feet(3 boxes) Repository: The Getty Research Institute Special Collections 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California, 90049-1688 (310) 440-7390 Abstract: The collection comprises sixty-nine photographs of Greece, Egypt and Constantinople attributed to the British photographer James Robertson. The majority of these photographs record the ancient monuments of the city of Athens. The remainder document a small number of ancient Greek sites outside Athens, as well as various architectural monuments in Constantinople. Photographs of one ancient and one Islamic monument in Egypt are also included. Request Materials: Request access to the physical materials described in this inventory through the catalog record for this collection. Click here for the access policy . Language: Collection material is in English Biographical/Historical Note Although James Robertson's photographs have enjoyed broad popularity both in his time and today, until recently many details of his life and career have remained obscure. New research has significantly altered the facts presented in much of the earlier scholarship and helped to clarify the professional relationship between Robertson and Felice Beato, his collaborator. Of Scottish descent, James Robertson was born in Middlesex outside London in 1813.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Greek Occupied Macedonia
    TheTruth about Greek Occupied Macedonia By Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov (Translated from Macedonian to English and edited by Risto Stefov) The Truth about Greek Occupied Macedonia Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2017 by Hristo Andonovski & Risto Stefov e-book edition January 7, 2017 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface................................................................................................6 CHAPTER ONE – Struggle for our own School and Church .......8 1. Macedonian texts written with Greek letters .................................9 2. Educators and renaissance men from Southern Macedonia.........15 3. Kukush – Flag bearer of the educational struggle........................21 4. The movement in Meglen Region................................................33 5. Cultural enlightenment movement in Western Macedonia..........38 6. Macedonian and Bulgarian interests collide ................................41 CHAPTER TWO - Armed National Resistance ..........................47 1. The Negush Uprising ...................................................................47 2. Temporary Macedonian government ...........................................49
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1999 Intellectuals and Nationalism in Cyprus: A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising Georgios P. Loizides Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Loizides, Georgios P., "Intellectuals and Nationalism in Cyprus: A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising" (1999). Master's Theses. 3885. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3885 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTELLECTUALS AND NATIONALISM IN CYPRUS: A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUALS IN THE 1931 UPRISING by Georgios P. Loizides A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Sociology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1999 Copyright by Georgios P. Loizides 1999 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to begin by thanking the members of my Thesis Committee, Dr. Paula Brush (chair), Dr. Douglas Davidson, and Dr. Vyacheslav Karpov for their invaluable help, guidance and insight, before and during the whole thesis-pregnancy period. Secondly, I would like to thank my friends and colleagues at the Department of Sociology for their feedback and support, without which this pro­ ject would surely be less informed. Georgios P.
    [Show full text]
  • 93323765-Mack-Ridge-Language-And
    Language and National Identity in Greece 1766–1976 This page intentionally left blank Language and National Identity in Greece 1766–1976 PETER MACKRIDGE 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Peter Mackridge 2009 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mackridge, Peter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritages of the Modern Greeks
    The heritages of the modern Greeks PROFESSOR PETER MACKRIDGE Introduction poetry from the Mycenaeans, because they could make a fresh start with a clean slate. He presents the heritages of the What makes the heritages of the modern Greeks unique? modern Greeks as a burden – and in some cases even an They stand between East and West in the sense that they incubus – since their legacies from ancient Greece and belong neither to the Catholic and Protestant West nor to Byzantium continually threaten to dominate and the Muslim East; their Roman heritage is more eastern than overshadow them. western; yet they have been dominated by Catholic as well as Ottoman occupiers. Although I am against the concept of Greek (or any other) exceptionalism, I believe that when The nationalisation of the past foreigners deal with modern Greece they need to be sensitive The Greeks of the last 200 years have possessed ample to cultural differences, which are the result of specific historical material with which to form their national historical experiences. Especially in times of crisis such as identity. Compare the Germans, who for their ancient past the one the Greeks are going through today, the world – and have only Tacitus’ Germania, a brief and impressionistic especially Europe – needs to show sympathy and solidarity ethnography written by an outsider who warned that his with their plight. Nevertheless, this shouldn’t inhibit us aim was to comment on the Romans of his time as much as from looking critically at what Greeks – and I mean chiefly on the Germans. Tacitus left the modern Germans a great Greek intellectual and political elites – have made of their deal of leeway to invent and imagine their own antiquity.
    [Show full text]