DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Planning Guidelines and Design Standards for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems Version 5.0 July 16, 2015 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] GENERAL INFORMATION DISCLAIMER DEFINITIONS AND IDENTIFICATION OF This document is being distributed under the sponsorship of REQUIREMENTS, BEST PRACTICES AND the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) of the U.S. SUPPORT INFORMATION Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the interest of When used in the PGDS, Requirement, Best Practice/Guidance, information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability and Support statements shall be defined as follows: for the contents or use of this document. Requirement—a statement of required, mandatory practice. All The purpose of the document is to present TSA’s requirements requirement statements are presented in underlined text. The verb and documented best practices for implementing a high “shall” is used. The verbs “should” and “will” are not used in performance and cost-effective checked baggage inspection requirement statements. system (CBIS). This document captures TSA’s requirements for a CBIS project from the beginning stages of design through commissioning of the system. Best practices are meant to Best Practice/Guidance—a statement of recommended, but highlight practices that have proven successful during not mandatory practice. These statements are generated from implementation and which TSA recommends for the Project lessons learned. These statements are geared to inform the Sponsor’s consideration during the design and construction of a reader of known effective practices that have proven successful CBIS. during implementation. Best practice/guidance statements can be identified within the document by the use of the verb “should”. The verbs “shall” and “will” are not used in best practice/guidance statements. Support—an informational statement that does not convey any degree of mandate, recommendation, authorization, prohibition, or enforceable condition. The verbs “shall” and “should” are not used in Support statements. The verb “will” can sometimes be used in support statements when referencing things that are the government’s responsibility. Planning Guidelines and Design Standards Version 5.0 for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems i July 16, 2015 GENERAL INFORMATION VERSION HISTORY Version Date Modifications 1.0 October 10, 2007 First published version 2.0 January 31, 2009 Update based on recommended follow-on studies and comments on Version 1.0 3.0 November 27, 2009 Update based on recommended follow-on studies and comments on Version 2.0 4.0 July 15, 2011 Update based on recommended follow-on studies and comments on Version 3.0 4.1 September 15, 2011 Update based on recommended follow-on studies and comments on Version 4.0 4.2 May 2, 2014 Update based on recommended follow-on studies and comments on Version 4.1 5.0 July 16, 2015 Update based on need for clear differentiation between requirements and best practices, follow-on studies and comments on Version 4.2 EXCEPTIONS For Operational Analysis Reports (OARs) and CBIS which are being upgraded and/or changed, TSA reserves the right to PGDS Applicability evaluate the CBIS against the most current published PGDS version. Designs for new checked baggage inspection systems shall comply with the requirements set forth in this version of the Planning Guidelines and Design Standards (PGDS). However, All CBIS will be tested to testing requirements as established in any project sponsor that has received formal confirmation from Appendix D of the latest version of the PGDS in effect at the time TSA of the receipt of the complete 30% Detailed Design Package of testing. This will allow TSA to obtain the best set of test data to for a CBIS project prior to the publication date of this version of the evaluate CBIS performance and to recommend fixes or PGDS shall continue to be governed by the PGDS version in effect improvements to the system. at the time of such confirmation. Furthermore, projects that have passed the 30% Detailed Design phase—including those systems Delayed Opening of CBIS currently under construction or in operation—with TSA approval TSA reserves the right to require a project sponsor to resubmit the shall be held to the design standards specified by that approval 30% Detailed Design Package under the requirements of the latest (either under the previous PGDS versions or prior standards in PGDS if the CBIS has not passed the Integrated Site Acceptance place before the publication of Version 1.0 of the PGDS). Test (ISAT), according to the PGDS version in effect at the time of Planning Guidelines and Design Standards Version 5.0 for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems ii July 16, 2015 GENERAL INFORMATION the original 30% Detailed Design Package submittal, within 2 years The public and industry are invited to submit comments to TSA at of TSA approval of the original 30% Detailed Design Package. [email protected] from the date of PGDS publication. Comments, as well as TSA proposed changes, will be shared with the industry Major Redesigns working group prior to each quarterly exchange session and will be reviewed and discussed during the sessions. The quarterly Major redesign of an existing CBIS shall be required to adhere to sessions are expected to occur in July, October, January, and April the latest version of the PGDS at the time of the major redesign. each year. Any additional comments provided through the industry The scope of a major redesign is to be discussed on a case-by- working group will also be considered during these sessions. case basis between the project sponsor and TSA. The TSA values all comments and input from industry INDUSTRY COLLABORATION AND COMMENTS stakeholders, but only those comments and input determined to enhance and improve the PGDS will be incorporated in the next TSA’s contractor responsible for the maintenance of the PGDS has release of the PGDS. An example of the standard form for been collaborating with an industry working group that represents comments is provided in Appendix A. airlines, BHS system designers, manufacturers, and consultants to finalize recommended changes to Version 4.2 of PGDS which will The comment form that can be found at the following address: address several key topics. http://www.tsa.gov/research-center/airport-checked-baggage- guidance-materials. The working group will continue to meet on a quarterly basis to discuss additional changes and maintain the collaboration. These changes will be presented to TSA for incorporation into the next version of PGDS. Planning Guidelines and Design Standards Version 5.0 for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems iii July 16, 2015 CONTENTS [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Planning Guidelines and Design Standards Version 5.0 for Checked Baggage Inspection Systems iv July 16, 2015 CONTENTS CONTENTS Page 1 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 APPLICABILITY .............................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.3 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 1-5 1.4 ORGANIZATION ............................................................................................................................. 1-6 1.5 NEXT STEPS .................................................................................................................................. 1-8 2 ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND PROJECT PHASING ......................................................................... 2-1 2.1 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................................. 2-12 2.1.1 Project Stakeholders ...................................................................................................... 2-12 2.1.2 Integrated Local Design Team ....................................................................................... 2-12 2.1.3 Project Sponsor .............................................................................................................. 2-14 2.1.4 TSA Headquarters .......................................................................................................... 2-14 2.1.5 High Level Overview of Design Review Process Interactions between the Project Sponsor, ILDT, and TSA Headquarters ....................................................... 2-14 2.2 PROJECT PHASING ...................................................................................................................... 2-16 2.2.1 Pre-Design Phase........................................................................................................... 2-24 2.2.2 Schematic Design Phase ............................................................................................... 2-27 2.2.3 Detailed Design Phase ................................................................................................... 2-30 2.2.4 Construction Phase ........................................................................................................ 2-42 2.2.5 Training ..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baggage Report 2011
    Baggage Report 2011 Specialists in air transport communications and IT solutions Baggage Report 2011 2 SITA Baggage Report 2011 Baggage Report 2011 Preface It has been a difficult year for all those Nonetheless, the air transport industry related to the cost of getting it back to involved in the air transport industry’s responded remarkably well. It is clear its owner. SITA, as the global operator response to the great logistical that improvements in technology, the of the tracking and tracing service for challenge of making sure that over two increasing deployment of baggage lost baggage continues to play its part, billion passengers’ bags get on the sortation systems and IATA’s Baggage innovating and bringing new improved right planes and are delivered to the Improvement Program are having an baggage management solutions to the right carousels in reasonable time for impact on keeping down the numbers market like BagSmart which we have collection by their owners. of bags mishandled. While there was already tested successfully at London a rise in the absolute number of bags Heathrow with the Star Alliance. It will Airlines, airports and ground handlers mishandled, this had to be expected be widely available in 2011 and is the respond to this task with the minimum in the circumstances. However, the first web-based application in the air of fuss but all were put to a severe test long-term trend shows the industry is transport industry that can warn of last year as passenger volumes rose for driving down overall mishandling rates potential baggage mishandlings the first time in two years and nature as it brings knowledge, experience and before they occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy-Peasy Self-Service Bag Tagging About 14 Million Easyjet Passengers Flying in and out of Gatwick Airport Choose to Use the Self-Service Bag-Drop System
    Company insight > Routes Company insight > Routes Easy-peasy self-service bag tagging About 14 million easyJet passengers flying in and out of Gatwick Airport choose to use the self-service bag-drop system. Considering that the airline introduced it just two and a half years ago, the uptake has been swift. Thomas Doogan, ground-operations customer experience manager at easyJet, speaks about the shift in passenger behaviour and the role eezeetags is playing in the airline’s innovation. client convenience, intends to raise that to 45% by the end of 2017, and to 70% by the end of 2018. There have been major benefits, not least in efficiency, says Doogan. “The perception of our friendliness by customers has increased by 10% and that is in the top two boxes – people who are ‘very satisfied’ and ‘extremely satisfied’.” As airports seek to streamline passenger flow, self-service facilities offer smoother, stress-free operations for travellers. The customers’ praise is attributable to the ground crew’s new-found freedom. Previously, the crew had to training on how to effectively use. These were comparatively “By really understanding each customer, we found the dedicate time and energy to tagging baggage in addition to complex and, therefore, left to the airline staff to apply. best solution for everyone and, therefore, the best overall interacting with customers. Now, its sole focus is greeting “We cannot expect passengers using a modern bag-drop solution for all travellers.” self-service passengers and being on hand to assist those system to apply a bag tag that was designed 40 years ago and While easyJet can lay claim to the title of kick-starter of in need of help to navigate the new system, which doesn’t meant to be applied by a trained agent,” stresses Vrieling.
    [Show full text]
  • RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking
    RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking Whitepaper Author Kristine P. Koldkjær, Lyngsoe Systems EXECUTIVE SUMMARY With potential savings of 20 cents for every 10 cents4 spent on implementing RFID for baggage handling and tracking, now is the time to realize the benefits and close the gap in baggage performance. RFID technology is expected to reduce mishandling rates for baggage by 25%4, which means large savings for airlines, and just as importantly, a better passenger experience. Barcode read rates on transfer bags are still found to be at 60-70%, so a large share of bags need to be handled twice and take up capacity. Due to the expected increase in doubling passenger numbers within the next 15 years1, new technology is required to support the industry with their baggage handling solutions. RFID has proven read rates of 99.9% in baggage handling and is the most reliable and cost-effective technology to increase capacity and improve the baggage handling process. Delta Airlines was the first airline to take the step into full RFID implementation for baggage handling in the airline industry, and it is no longer a matter of whether to go for RFID, but a matter of when. Airlines waiting too long will fall behind in the race to provide increased passenger services, better baggage handling, improved security and lower operational costs. 2 | RFID for Baggage Handling and Tracking WHY RFID TECHNOLOGY FOR BAGGAGE HANDLING AND TRACKING? TRACK MY BAG With the rapid development of technologies such as mobile apps, customers now require more information from companies with which they have dealings.
    [Show full text]
  • DCS Customer Management Course Guide
    DCS Customer Management Course Guide Table of Contents Before You Start ...................................................................................... 1 What's New in this Course Guide .......................................................... 2 Chapter 1 Getting Started......................................................................................... 3 What Is Customer Management? .......................................................... 3 Security Restrictions .............................................................................. 5 How to Sign In to Customer Management............................................. 6 How to Set Advanced Sign-in Parameters ............................................ 7 How to Sign Out and Close Customer Management........................... 10 How to Open an Application ................................................................ 10 How to Close an Application................................................................ 11 How to Set the Default Carrier............................................................. 12 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Title Bar and Resize Controls ............................................................................................... 13 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Menus ......................... 14 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Screen Features ......... 17 How to Use the Customer Management GUI: Navigation and Shortcuts ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE Baggage Report
    2013 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY INSIGHTS THE Baggage report In association with PREFACE SITA’s ninth annual Baggage Report shows a continued There is already a strong momentum to reduce mishandling improvement in the baggage mishandling rates of the further. As an industry, we are collaboratively addressing the industry. The headline figure has now dropped to 8.83 issues and developing the solutions. IATA’s InBag program mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers, down from 8.99 has set a target to reduce the global baggage mishandling in 2011 and represents a drop of 44.5% in the number of rate to 4.5 mishandled bags per thousand passengers. It is mishandled bags in the last six years. Remarkably, given a figure that is nearly half of where we are today, so there is the nearly three billion passengers using the air transport still much work to do. While it is challenging, SITA is working system last year, it means that for every hundred passengers with its industry partners, including IATA and the ACI, to make traveling fewer than one bag was reported as mishandled. it happen. For the industry it translates into an annual cost saving of US$2.1 billion for 2012. We are now seeing the rewards of a concerted collaborative effort to improve the baggage handling operations of the industry and in so doing reducing a major cause of passenger Francesco Violante dissatisfaction. Delayed baggage, which was responsible for Chief Executive Officer, SITA 82.9% of mishandling, fell 2.4% in 2012 to 5.67 per thousand passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Cincinnati International Airport Delta Airlines Cvg Automated Baggage System
    CINCINNATI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DELTA AIRLINES CVG AUTOMATED BAGGAGE SYSTEM OWNER The Delta Airlines installation in Cincinnati is one of the most successful baggage DELTA AIRLINES handling system applications in the world. Quite a claim, but this installation combines proven high speed technologies to enhance passenger service levels and minimize OWNER’S REPRESENTATIVE labor costs. Development risk was never a concern since all of the equipment utilized MR. JAMES W. GREENE, DL has been used in other installations. Equipment cost was justified by decreased operating costs. This system was commissioned in 1995 and, although the start-up BNP PROJECT MANAGER was not without difficulties, it’s performance has since proven itself. The first phase of JIMMY MENOSCAL the CVG master plan consisted of a major redevelopment of Delta’s facilities at this major hub, an expansion of airside capabilities from 25 gates to 50-plus gates. LOCATION Construction activities included a major new Federal Inspections Services Facility, a CINCINNATI, OHIO, USA new remote concourse providing superior transfer passenger handling, concessions and inspiring architecture, a new landside terminal providing interfaces to the local CONTRACT PERIOD Cincinnati passengers, an expansion of the Concourse A facility and a new 50-plus 1991 - 1993 gate commuter aircraft passenger terminal. Interconnecting these facilities was a new state-of-the-art people mover system. In combination, the CVG project represents one PROJECT AMOUNT the best origin/destination and transfer terminals in the world. The Delta Air Lines US $40 MILLION Automated Baggage System (ABS) is designed to process originating, terminating, and “hot” transfer baggage. The originating baggage handling system is somewhat REFERENCE unique for a United States carrier in that individual feeder conveyors are provided at DELTA AIRLINES each ticketing position.
    [Show full text]
  • Checked Baggage Size Requirements
    Checked Baggage Size Requirements WhenFilmiest Elmore Aylmer excused redding his extempore cenospecies and tactically,wainscoting she not dissatisfies languidly herenough, indicium is Uriah civilise conversational? complicatedly. Tall intransitive.Price outjockeys no bullheads overtaxes defensively after Quigman recant controvertibly, quite Forbidden from rain and easily manage travel profile to applicable only letters and glass products from online with each checked baggage Pressione a tecla TAB para acessar os outros tipos de promoções. Debe aceptar la condición del motivo del reembolso para poder continuar con la solicitud. Additional baggage allowance to a car rental costs for american airlines shall only care what can i use it has its usage. Check this is a valid date. Pet carriers are nonrefundable. View your needs to have questions is required medical form has your nearest finnair plus. Extra baggage is idle to availability. United Club lounge access. If all checked baggage size requirements of size? You check baggage size, checking excess baggage loss of similar to be required information is. Extra bag rates differ per route. Silver Airways as every first operating carrier. All current requirements on the convict of lithium batteries apply to the release of Smart Bags. Change your reservation or order additional services. The instrument must be packaged correctly to place it safely in the seat. Los angeles to resolve this is bad quality, other requirements may find out our checked baggage size requirements, flight is usually bring a summary of benefits. Card details of volume of horizn go through a required field is now leaving this? The event origin claim was later found.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Guide 2017/2018 Star Alliance Tm
    REFERENCE GUIDE 2017/2018 STAR ALLIANCE TM FOR EMPLOYEES OF STAR ALLIANCE MEMBER CARRIERS 21st Edition, November 2017 WELCOME WELCOME TO THE 2017/18 EDITION OF THE STAR ALLIANCE REFERENCE GUIDE This guide is intended to provide a single reference point for a wealth of detail about the services offered by the 28 Star Alliance member airlines. It gives an overview of each airline’s policies (for example on baggage) and services (such as frequent flyer programmes and lounges) as well as information and maps for the main Star Alliance hub airports. The aim is to help all Star Alliance member airline employees to assist customers who are travelling on any Star Alliance flight. Information changes regularly, so please continue to consult your airline’s own information systems for changes and updates, as well as for operational information and procedures. We are planning a future electronic version of this guide with more frequent updates. Please let us have your feedback and comments on the Reference Guide at [email protected]. Thank you, Star Alliance Internal Communications 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW AIRPORTS INFORMATION 78 Welcome 2 Priority Baggage Handling 79 Greetings from Star Alliance Headquarters 4 Free Checked Baggage Allowances 80 Vision / Mission 5 Special Checked Baggage 86 Facts & Figures 6 Carry-on Baggage Policy 151 Connecting Partners 10 Irregular Operations Handling 152 Interline E-Ticketing FAQ - Airports 155 GENERAL INFORMATION 12 Customer Benefits 13 Frequent Flyer Programmes 14 LOUNGE INFORMATION 157 Reservation
    [Show full text]
  • Contactless Solutions Are Key to Promoting a Safe, Secure, Touchless and Seamless Passenger Experience
    WELCOME YOUR WEBINAR WILL START SHORTLY Thank you to our sponsor for this webinar During the webinar Your microphone will be muted during the webinar. If you have questions, please use the Q&A panel. All questions are moderated by our legal team. You also have a chat panel. SPECIAL SERIES: RESHAPING THE PASSENGER EXPERIENCE Competition Law Guidelines This webinar is being conducted in full compliance with antitrust and competition law. • Any discussion regarding matters such as fares, charges, division or sharing of traffic, or revenues or concerning any other competitively sensitive topics outside the scope of the agenda is strictly prohibited. • IATA will not answer questions pertaining to individual policies or commercial decisions and/or being subject to bilateral commercial discussions between airlines and their suppliers or customers. Speakers Suresh M Khadakbhavi Jasper Quak Assistant Vice President Managing Director Innovation Lab, Bangalore BAGTAG International Airport Ltd Kelly-Anne Frenette Andrew Price Alan Hayden-Murray Senior Manager Head, Global Head, Airport Passenger Process Baggage Operations Passenger and Security Products A quick question for our audience: Contactless solutions are key to promoting a safe, secure, touchless and seamless passenger experience Biometrics More personal control 8 7/3/2020 A vision for an end-to-end biometric passenger journey A collaborative identity > Pax data is collected, admissibility is validated, and identity is confirmed. management solution spanning across all stakeholders using
    [Show full text]
  • BCBP Implementation Guide Is Intended to Be Used As Guidance Material When Airlines Would Like to Implement Bar Coded Boarding Pass (BCBP)
    BAR CODED BOARDING PASS (BCBP) IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE Effective Date: 1st June, 2018 Seven Edition Page | 1 DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Association shall not be held responsible for loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Furthermore, the International Air Transport Association expressly disclaims all and any liability to any person, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person in reliance on the contents of this publication. No part of the Common Use Passenger Processing Systems Implementation Guide may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission from: International Air Transport Association 800 Place Victoria, P.O. Box 113 Montreal, Quebec, Canada H4Z 1M1 © IATA 2017 Page | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 6 1.1. Background ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Integration Study
    Rail Baltica Project Airport Integration Study (Passengers and Luggage Services) Feasibility study – Final Report Date 18/10/2019 Final version The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Airport integration study (Passenger and Luggage Services) Table of Contents Rationale ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Assignment Order identification ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Brief description of the assignment ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Documents considered for this assignment ............................................................................................................................... 6 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9 WP 4: Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Baggage Tracking IATA Resolution 753/A4A Resolution 30.53 Implementation Guide
    Baggage Tracking IATA Resolution 753/A4A Resolution 30.53 Implementation Guide Issue 3.0, 13 November 2017 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 3 RESOLUTION 753 8 CURRENT RESOLUTION 8 COMPLIANCE WITH RESOLUTION 753/30.53 9 4 DISCLAIMER 10 5 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 11 6 BAG TRACKING OPTIONS 14 CORE TRACKING POINTS 14 DEFINITION OF A TRACKING POINT 17 WHAT IS RECORDED AT A TRACKING POINT 17 WHERE AND HOW CAN A TRACKING POINT BE RECORDED 18 POTENTIAL RECORDING METHODS 21 END TO END BAGGAGE TRACKING 24 TRACKING IRREGULARITIES OPERATIONS 25 7 BAGGAGE DATA EXCHANGE 26 WHEN TO EXCHANGE BAGGAGE TRACKING DATA 26 HOW TO EXCHANGE BAGGAGE TRACKING DATA 27 8 REALISING THE BENEFITS OF BAGGAGE TRACKING 31 PREVENTING BAGGAGE MISHANDLING 31 MISHANDLING ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS 32 ENSURING FAIRER PRO-RATIONING OF MISHANDLED BAG CHARGES 34 IMPROVE ON-TIME DEPARTURE 34 FASTER MISHANDLED BAGGAGE REPATRIATION 34 FRAUD PREVENTION/REDUCTION 35 MEASURING BAGGAGE PERFORMANCE 35 BETTER PASSENGER EXPERIENCE 36 BAGGAGE TRACKING DATA TO INTERNAL AIRLINE STAFF 37 Baggage Tracking | IATA 753/A4A 30.53 | Implementation Guide Issue 3.0 | 13 November 2017 | Page 1 of 85 9 BAGGAGE TRACKING PARTNERS 39 9.1 POTENTIAL TRACKING DATA PROVIDERS 39 AIRPORTS 40 INTERLINE AIRLINES 40 GROUND HANDLERS OR HANDLING PARTNERS 40 10 BEST PRACTICE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE 41 EVALUATING TRACKING STRATEGIES 41 CASE STUDIES 42 11 DATA CHARTER 43 12 APPENDIX A – FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 45 13 APPENDIX B - SAMPLE PROCESS VIEWS 53 ACCEPTANCE PROCESS 53 LOAD PROCESS 54 TRANSFER PROCESS 55 ARRIVAL PROCESS 56
    [Show full text]