The Strategic Outlook for Canada

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Strategic Outlook for Canada L'institut de la CAD CDA Institute CDA L'Institut Cahier Vimy Institute de la CAD Vimy Paper ~ 1987 ~ 2017 THE STRATEGIC OUTLOOK FOR CANADA Ferry De Kerckhove No. 34 English version Vimy Paper Vol. 34 - 2017: The Strategic Outlook for Canada Print: ISBN 978-1-928082-10-1 PDF: ISBN 978-1-928082-11-8 Version française Cahier Vimy 34 - 2017: Les perspectives stratégique du Canada Print: ISBN 978-1-928082-12-5 PDF: ISBN 978-1-928082-13-2 © Conference of Defence Associations Institute, 2017 THE STRATEGIC OUTLOOK FOR CANADA 2017 Strategy and Mission after the Defence Policy Review Advisors Richard Cohen editors Vice-Admiral Drew Robertson (Ret'd) David McDonough, PhD Joel Sokolsky, PhD Elliot Tepper, PhD Col Charles Davies (Ret.) The listing of advisors does not imply concurrence with the authors' findings, rather they were a consultative resource to whom the authors are grateful. ii THE STRATEGIC OUTLOOK FOR CANADA 2017 Message from the Chair of the CDA environmentally responsible and the vast ma- & the Chair of the Board, CDA Insti- jority of our audience prefer to download the tute document on whatever modern platform they so choose. We have also found in recent years As Canada celebrates its 150th anniversary and that demand for printed copies has fallen con- all its great accomplishments since Confedera- siderably. tion, we find ourselves in a complex, challeng- Production of the Strategic Outlook is a major ing and potentially perilous time from a se- undertaking and we would like to acknowl- curity and defence perspective. Recent world edge the substantial effort on the part of the events, including ongoing instability in many many people who contributed to the 2017 regions; changes on the North American conti- edition. We are deeply indebted to the seven nent; growing tensions in the Asia Pacific area; authors who contributed to it: Professor Kim and many others suggest that we are going Richard Nossal of Queen’s University; Dr Jim through a tectonic shift in world affairs. Can- Cox (also Brigadier-General [ret’d]); Profes- ada will be challenged to chart a safe course to sor Andrea Charron of Carleton University; the future. Dr Mike Cessford (also Colonel [ret’d]) of the A thoughtful and thorough public discourse Canadian Commercial Corporation; Andrew on the future direction for national security Rasiulis of the Canadian Global Affairs Insti- and defence policies, strategies, plans and pro- tute; Dr Eric Lerhe (also Commodore [ret’d]) grams is therefore needed beyond the Trudeau of Dalhousie University; and Dr Ken Pennie government’s recently completed consultations (Lieutenant-General [ret’d]). We also thank on its Defence Policy Review, as welcome as Dr David McDonough, until recently our Re- that initiative is. As a contribution to this dis- search Manager and Senior Editor, who was course, we are pleased to release Vimy Paper the principal architect, planner, and organizer #34 The Strategic Outlook for Canada 2017. It of this Strategic Outlook. CDA Institute Re- is the sixth in our series of annual examina- search Fellow Chuck Davies and Senior Ana- tions of the global trends impacting Canada’s lyst Matthew Overton completed final editing security and national interests. These papers of this year’s edition. We are very grateful are part of the CDA Institute’s ongoing efforts to Richard Evraire and André Scialom who to inform Canadians and their governments contributed many hours with the translation about Canadian security and defence issues. and proof-reading of the manuscript. Four independent reviewers – Vice-Admiral (ret’d) This year, we have elected to publish the Stra- Drew Robertson, Richard Cohen, Elliot Tepper tegic Outlook in electronic format not only as and Dr Joel Sokolsky – also provided insightful a cost-saving measure, but also because it is CDA INSTITUTE | VIMY PAPER LES PERSPECTIVES STRATÉGIQUES DU CANADA 2017 iii TITLE comments to the contributing writers. Finally, Office Manager Robert Legere was indispens- able in doing the layout and production of the document. The efforts of all these people and many other volunteers were indispensable to getting the CDA Institute Vimy Paper #34 – The 2017 Strategic Outlook for Canada ready for publication. We sincerely hope that you will enjoy reading it and, more importantly, give serious thought to the issues, perspectives, and questions raised. They are important for Canada’s security and worth discussing at every opportunity. Denis Rouleau, Chair of the CDA Daniel Gosselin, Chair of the Board, CDA Institute February 10, 2017 L’INSTITUT DE LA CAD | CAHIER VIMY iv THE STRATEGIC OUTLOOK FOR CANADA 2017 FOREWORD have essentially no national dialogue, let alone a consensus, on what capabilities the country will The CDA Institute annually publishes its flag- require to successfully respond – either alone or ship Vimy Paper – The Strategic Outlook for in concert with others. Canada, a broad examination of the current and likely future global trends impacting Canada’s The annual CDA Institute Strategic Outlook for security and national interests. This is aimed Canada does not fill that gap. Rather, it is aimed at encouraging informed public debate about at readers both inside and outside government security and defence issues and, unashamedly, who are interested in the public debate on secu- encouraging the Government of Canada to give rity and defence issues. It seeks to provide in- these critical areas more serious attention. This sights into the global issues, events, and trends year is particularly important given the current that can be expected to affect Canada’s security defence policy review. and defence interests today, tomorrow, and in the longer-term future. By so doing, we hope to The government does a good job of evaluating encourage a more vigorous and better-informed future economic trends and risks. The recent debate. 2016 Update of Long-Term Economic and Fis- cal Projections by the Department of Finance The 2017 Strategic Outlook (Vimy Paper #34) provides a concise, comprehensive, and sober- represents a significant departure from previous ing projection of Canadian demographic, eco- editions. Since 2012, the document has been nomic, and fiscal trends out to the 2050s – and ably written by one or two individuals, notably what it means for public finances over the peri- the CDA Institute’s widely experienced Board od. It is regularly updated and a must-read doc- Members Ferry de Kerckhove and George ument for anyone interested in the challenges Petrolekas, and former CDA Institute member facing Canada in the future. Paul Chapin, with input from various experts. This year, we have sought to offer new perspec- However, the government is significantly less tives by inviting seven distinguished scholars diligent when it comes to security and defence. and practitioners who have studied global secu- Unlike most other “middle powers”, it publish- rity and defence issues for many years to each es no regular assessment of the global security provide their perspectives in specific areas. trends and threats faced by the country, and has no articulated comprehensive strategy for Professor Kim Richard Nossal of the Centre safeguarding itself and its interests. Without a for International and Defence Policy at Queen’s national perspective on what the future chal- University introduces the Strategic Outlook by lenges are likely to be and how we intend to examining the political dynamics around the face them, it is perhaps not surprising that we Canadian government’s approach to security CDA INSTITUTE | VIMY PAPER LES PERSPECTIVES STRATÉGIQUES DU CANADA 2017 v TITLE and defence, including the current defence pol- gues that defending these national interests re- icy review, from the domestic, continental, and quires renewed attention to Canada’s ability to global perspectives. He draws a clear picture contribute to continental defence. This means a of the uncertain and challenging global politi- serious investment in Canada-US defence rela- cal environment facing the government and the tions at the highest levels and a rediscovery of nation, pointing out limitations in the path the the essential art of bilateral diplomacy between government appears to have chosen to navigate the two nations. through it. In Chapter 3, Colonel Dr. Michael Cessford In Chapter 1, Brigadier-General Dr. James Cox (Retired), Middle East Regional Director for (Retired), a Senior Fellow with the Macdon- the Canadian Commercial Corporation and a ald-Laurier Institute and Research Fellow at Research Fellow at the CDA Institute, offers in- the CDA Institute, sets out the strategic context sights into expeditionary operations from the within which the government’s policy responses Mideast and Europe to Africa. He discusses to global challenges and risks need to be devel- the dangers inherent in these operations and oped. He describes the relationship between stresses the need for clear and pragmatic strate- policies, strategies, plans, and priorities – and gic oversight by the Government of Canada. He the importance of following a more disciplined argues that these commitments, though perhaps and rigorous process in developing and imple- motivated by Canadian values, must be linked menting them than Canadian governments typ- to national interests and objectives that justify ically do. He argues that Canada needs a much putting our personnel in harm’s way. deeper and broader defence review than the Chapter 4 looks at NATO and Europe. It was DPR process now underway. written by Andrew Rasiulis, a Research Fellow Chapter 2 was written by Professor Andrea with the Canadian Global Affairs Institute who Charron, Director of Carleton University’s Cen- has 35 years of experience as a defence strategic tre for Security, Intelligence and Defence Stud- analyst, arms control negotiator, policy officer, ies; Adjunct Professor at the Norman Paterson and Director of Military Training and Cooper- School of International Affairs; and Research ation. He has an MA from the Norman Patter- Fellow at the CDA Institute.
Recommended publications
  • A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993
    Canadian Military History Volume 24 Issue 2 Article 8 2015 A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 Greg Donaghy Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Greg Donaghy "A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993." Canadian Military History 24, 2 (2015) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 A Calculus of Interest Canadian Peacekeeping Diplomacy in Cyprus, 1963-1993 GREG DONAGHY Abstract: Fifty years ago, Canadian peacekeepers landed on the small Mediterranean island of Cyprus, where they stayed for thirty long years. This paper uses declassified cabinet papers and diplomatic records to tackle three key questions about this mission: why did Canadians ever go to distant Cyprus? Why did they stay for so long? And why did they leave when they did? The answers situate Canada’s commitment to Cypress against the country’s broader postwar project to preserve world order in an era marked by the collapse of the European empires and the brutal wars in Algeria and Vietnam. It argues that Canada stayed— through fifty-nine troop rotations, 29,000 troops, and twenty-eight dead— because peacekeeping worked. Admittedly there were critics, including Prime Ministers Pearson, Trudeau, and Mulroney, who complained about the failure of peacemaking in Cyprus itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Island Tides News
    GulfGulf Islands’Islands’ Giving The Coast A Community Voice For 27 Years Volume 29 Number 4 March 2 - March 15, 2017 Online Voluntary Annual Subscription: $30 Photo: John Cameron Gulf Islands Secondary School students could choose among 40+ workshops at GISS’s first Mental Wellness Summit. The event was organized by students, (see story below). Highschool holds first Charter challenge over ‘discriminatory’ voting system mental wellness summit Fair Voting BC is mounting a challenge under the Voting BC President Tony Hodgson says. Catelyn Creswick Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms’ ‘Our goals in launching a Canadian Charter of guarantee of effective representation. Fair Voting Rights & Freedoms challenge are to have the court Gulf islands Secondary School held a Mental BC says refusing to overhaul the outdated first-past- rule that our current voting system contravenes the Wellness Summit on February 16. GiSS’s first the-post voting system amounts to discrimination, Charter and order the government to adopt a voting wellness summit served as a fantastic initiative to since the Charter guarantees citizens’ right to vote system that complies with the Charter. open up the discussion about mental health and and right to equal treatment. Before launching its challenge Fair Vote BC wellness by providing an abundance of information Among other rulings, Fair Voting BC bases its needs to have pledges to cover $260,000 for the and resources. challenge on the 1991 Saskatchewan Electoral hearings, plus a guarantee of $100,000 to As a student who feels the everyday pressures of Boundaries Reference case. Justice Beverley indemnify our plaintiffs ($360,000 total).
    [Show full text]
  • What Has He Really Done Wrong?
    The Chrétien legacy Canada was in such a state that it WHAT HAS HE REALLY elected Brian Mulroney. By this stan- dard, William Lyon Mackenzie King DONE WRONG? easily turned out to be our best prime minister. In 1921, he inherited a Desmond Morton deeply divided country, a treasury near ruin because of over-expansion of rail- ways, and an economy gripped by a brutal depression. By 1948, Canada had emerged unscathed, enriched and almost undivided from the war into spent last summer’s dismal August Canadian Pension Commission. In a the durable prosperity that bred our revising a book called A Short few days of nimble invention, Bennett Baby Boom generation. Who cared if I History of Canada and staring rescued veterans’ benefits from 15 King had halitosis and a professorial across Lake Memphrémagog at the years of political logrolling and talent for boring audiences? astonishing architecture of the Abbaye launched a half century of relatively St-Benoît. Brief as it is, the Short History just and generous dealing. Did anyone ll of which is a lengthy prelude to tries to cover the whole 12,000 years of notice? Do similar achievements lie to A passing premature and imperfect Canadian history but, since most buy- the credit of Jean Chrétien or, for that judgement on Jean Chrétien. Using ers prefer their own life’s history to a matter, Brian Mulroney or Pierre Elliott the same criteria that put King first more extensive past, Jean Chrétien’s Trudeau? Dependent on the media, and Trudeau deep in the pack, where last seven years will get about as much the Opposition and government prop- does Chrétien stand? In 1993, most space as the First Nations’ first dozen aganda, what do I know? Do I refuse to Canadians were still caught in the millennia.
    [Show full text]
  • NAFTA at 10: 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 Progress, Potential, and Precedents
    ecedents NAFTA at 10: NAFTA ess, Potential, and Pr ogr Pr NAFTA at 10: Progress, Potential, and Precedents www.wilsoncenter.org Washington, DC 20004-3027 Washington, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, One Woodrow Wilson Plaza One Woodrow CENTER FOR SCHOLARS THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL THE WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL NAFTA AT 10: YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW Lessons Learned and Unmet Challenges Volume One Conference Proceedings Canada Institute Latin American Program Project on America and the Global Economy NAFTA AT 10: YESTERDAY, TODAY, AND TOMORROW Lessons Learned and Unmet Challenges Volume One Conference Proceedings ©2005 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS LEE H. HAMILTON, PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR CONTENTS BOARD OF TRUSTEES Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair David A. Metzner, Vice Chair Acknowledgements vii Public Members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; Allen Preface ix Weinstein, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Condoleezza Rice, Secretary, Conference Summary xiii U.S. Department of State; Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Margaret Spellings, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education. NAFTA at 10 Conference Agenda xvii Designated Appointee of the President from Within the Federal Government: Tamala L. Longaberger PANEL 11 NAFTA at 10: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow— Private Citizen Members: Carol Cartwright, Robin B. Cook, Donald E. Garcia, Lessons Learned and Unmet Challenges Bruce S. Gelb, Sander R. Gerber, Charles L. Glazer, Ignacio Sanchez PANEL 27 Future Directions for NAFTA: The Possibility of Closer Economic, Political, and Social Ties ABOUT THE CENTER The Center is the living memorial of the United States of America to the nation’s twenty-eighth president, Woodrow Wilson.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic
    Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Robert J. Bookmiller Gulf Research Center i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Dubai, United Arab Emirates (_}A' !_g B/9lu( s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ *_D |w@_> TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B uG_GAE#­'c`}A' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB9f1s{5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'cAE/ i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBª E#'Gvp*E#'B!v,¢#'E#'1's{5%­''tDu{xC)/_9%_(n{wGL­i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uAc8mBmA' , ¡dA'E#'c>EuA'&_{3A'B¢#'c}{3'(E#'c j{w*E#'cGuG{y*E#'c A"'E#'c CEudA%'eC_@c {3EE#'{4¢#_(9_,ud{3' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBB`{wB¡}.0%'9{ymA'E/B`d{wA'¡>ismd{wd{3 *4#/b_dA{w{wdA'¡A_A'?uA' k pA'v@uBuCc,E9)1Eu{zA_(u`*­E @1_{xA'!'1"'9u`*1's{5%­''tD¡>)/1'==A'uA'f_,E i_m(#ÆA Gulf Research Center 187 Oud Metha Tower, 11th Floor, 303 Sheikh Rashid Road, P. O. Box 80758, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Tel.: +971 4 324 7770 Fax: +971 3 324 7771 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.grc.ae First published 2009 i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Gulf Research Center (_}A' !_g B/9lu( Dubai, United Arab Emirates s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ © Gulf Research Center 2009 *_D All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in |w@_> a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • I. the Canadian Army
    WOUNDED Canada’s Military and the Legacy of Neglect Our Disappearing Options for Defending the Nation Abroad and at Home An Interim Report by the Senate Committee on National Security and Defence September 2005 MEMBERSHIP 38th Parliament – 1st Session STANDING COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE The Honourable Colin Kenny, Chair The Honourable J. Michael Forrestall, Vice-Chair and The Honourable Norman K. Atkins The Honourable Tommy Banks The Honourable Jane Cordy The Honourable Joseph A. Day The Honourable Michael A. Meighen The Honourable Jim Munson The Honourable Pierre Claude Nolin *The Honourable Jack Austin P.C. (or the Honourable William Rompkey, P.C.) *The Honourable Noël A. Kinsella (or the Honourable Terry Stratton) *Ex Officio Members Other Senators who participated during the 38th Parliament – 1st Session: The Honourable Senators: The Honourable Ione Christensen The Honourable Anne C. Cools The Honourable Percy Downe The Honourable Rose-Marie Losier-Cool The Honourable John Lynch-Staunton The Honourable Terry M. Mercer The Honourable Wilfred P. Moore The Honourable Donald H. Oliver The Honourable Gerard A. Phalen The Honourable William Rompkey The Honourable Peter A. Stollery The Honourable David Tkachuk The Honourable Marilyn Trenholme Counsell MEMBERSHIP 37th Parliament – 3rd Session STANDING COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND DEFENCE The Honourable Colin Kenny, Chair The Honourable J. Michael Forrestall, Vice-Chair and The Honourable Norman K. Atkins The Honourable Tommy Banks The Honourable Jane Cordy The Honourable Joseph A. Day The Honourable Michael A. Meighen The Honourable Jim Munson The Honourable David P. Smith, P.C. *The Honourable Jack Austin P.C. (or the Honourable William Rompkey, P.C.) *The Honourable John Lynch-Staunton (or the Honourable Noël A.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 6: Canada in the Post War World – 1950S Baby Boom Suburbs Consumerism Massey Commission CBC National Film Board (NFB)
    CHAPTER 6: Canada in the CHAPTER 7: Times of CHAPTER 8: Canada Shifts Post War World – 1950s Turmoil – Canada in the Focus: 1980 and Beyond 1960s and 1970s Baby boom “youthquake” Multiculturalism Act 1988 Suburbs Counterculture Aboriginal self government Consumerism John Diefenbaker Land claims Massey Commission Lester Pearson Specific claims CBC Pierre Trudeau Comprehensive claims National Film Board (NFB) Tommy Douglas Nisga’a Treaty 2000 Canada Council for the Arts Jean Lesage Oka Crisis 1990 CRTC Robert Bourassa Royal Commission on “open door” immigration policy Rene Levesque Aboriginal Peoples 1991 Displaced persons Canadian Bill of Rights 1960 Pierre Trudeau Louis St. Laurent Omnibus Bill 1969 Rene Levesque John Diefenbaker Multiculturalism Jean Chretien Lester Pearson Marginalized Brian Mulroney Maurice Duplessis Disenfranchised Jacques Parizeau “distinct nation” White Paper 1969 Patriation/patriate Cold War Red Paper 1980 Quebec referendum Communism “unhyphenated Canadian” Sovereignty-association Superpowers Maple Leaf flag 1965 Distinct society Igor Gouzenko Canada Pension Plan Amending formula Red Scare/Red Menace Canada Assistance Plan Notwithstanding clause Middle power Medical Care Act “Kitchen Accord” NATO Quiet Revolution Constitution Act 1982 Warsaw Pact FLQ Meech Lake Accord 1987 NORAD Separatist Elijah Harper Radar Parti Quebecois (PQ) Bloc Quebecois DEW Line Royal Commission on Charlottetown Accord 1992 Pinetree Line Bilingualism and Biculturalism 1995 Quebec Referendum Mid-Canada Line Official Languages Act 1969 Clarity
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuking Soviet IMF Membership in an Era of Glasnost
    The Review of International Affairs 69 UDK: 339.7(470) Biblid 0543-3657, 61 (2010) Vol. LXI, No. 1137, pp. 69–90 Original Scientific Paper February 2010 Jonathan Crossen and Bessma Momani1 Rebuking Soviet IMF Membership in an Era of Glasnost ABSTRACT Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was keen to join the IMF as a sign of the international community’s confidence in perestroika and in his leadership. Based on archival material, US government freedom of information requests, and personal interviews it appears that the Soviet application to join the IMF was rejected. The G7, led by the United States, had serious doubts about Gorbachev’s commitment to join the free-market community. In contrast, first Russian President Boris Yeltsin was encouraged to apply for full membership only days after taking office. This article chronicles the debate in international capitals on the fate of the Soviet application in the IMF and reveals this unknown period of international relations. Moreover, this case teaches us the value of being viewed as a part of the community of states as an explanation for gaining membership into international organization. Key words: IMF; Soviet Union; Russia; membership; international organizations. Returning the Soviet Union to its Rightful Place at the IMF? The Soviet delegation attended the Bretton Woods meetings in New Hampshire in 1944, which then gave birth to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. As Raymond Mikesell, former adviser to the US Treasury delegation, noted in his memoirs of the Bretton Woods meetings, the Soviet delegation were friendly participants in the conference and were jovial with US Treasury officials.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 July 2018 PAGES: 36 Prepared By: Surgeon Captain J
    S E N I O R C O M M A N D E R S CANADIAN FORCES 1955 to 2018 UPDATED: 20 July 2018 PAGES: 36 Prepared by: Surgeon Captain John Blatherwick, CM, CStJ, OBC, CD, MD, FRCP(C), LLD(Hon) ============================================================================== 1 SENIOR OFFICERS - CANADIAN FORCES CHAIRMAN - CHIEFS OF STAFF 1951 - 1960 General Charles FOULKES, CC, CB, CBE, DSO, CD 1964 - 1966 Air Chief Marshal Frank Robert MILLER, CC, CBE, CD 1966 - 1968 General Jean Victor ALLARD, CC, CBE, DSO**, GOQ, CD =================================================================================================== CHIEF OF DEFENCE STAFF 1968 - 1969 General Jean Victor ALLARD, CC, CBE, DSO**, CD 1969 - 1972 General Frederick Ralph SHARPE, CMM, DFC, CD 1972 - 1977 General Jacques Alfred DEXTRAZE, CC, CMM, CBE, DSO*, KStJ, CD 1977 - 1980 Admiral Robert Hilborn FALLS, CMM, CStJ, CD 1980 - 1983 General Ramsey Muir WITHERS, CMM, CStJ, CD 1983 - 1986 General Gerard Charles Edouard THERIAULT, CMM, OStJ, CD 1986 - 1989 General Paul David MANSON, OC, CMM, OStJ, CD 1989 - 1992 General Alfred John G.D. DE CHASTELAIN, OC, CMM, CH, OStJ, CD 1992 - 1993 Admiral John ANDERSON, CMM, CD 1993 - 1996 General Alfred John G.D. DE CHASTELAIN, OC, CMM, CH, CStJ, CD 1996 - 1996 General Jean Joseph Edouard BOYLE, CMM, CD 1996 - 1997 Vice-Admiral Lawrence Edward MURRAY, CMM, CD (08 October 1996) ACTING CDS 1997 - 2001 General Joseph Maurice BARIL, CMM, SBStJ, MSM, CD (17 September 1997) 2001 - 2005 General Raymond HENAULT, OC, CMM, CStJ, MSC, CD (28 June 2001) 2005 - 2008 General
    [Show full text]
  • Canada 1984 [06/21/1984- 07/15/1984] Box: RAC Box 1
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: European and Soviet Affairs Directorate, NSC: Records Folder Title: Canada 1984 [06/21/1984- 07/15/1984] Box: RAC box 1 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ WITHDRAWAL SHEET Ronald Reagan Library DAxo'(Jt'.Cl<\ ~ So~et l\{f<tl<S D\•r c f>-·, ,,j~ Collection Name ~~ f\l<;C ·. f.-1". r0< ·:..U Withdrawer CAS 116/2005 File Folder CANADA 1984 [JUNE 21-illLY 15, 1984] FOIA F00-094 Box Number MUNTON 9 ID Doc Type Document Description No of Doc Date Restrictions Pages 1687 PAPER RE CANADA P. 3 ONLY 1 ND Bl R 3/11/2008 F00-094 1688 MEMCON RR AND MULRONEY ET AL 5 6121/1984 Bl R 7/6/2006 Freedom of Information Act· (5 U.S.C. 552(b)] 8·1 National security classifled Information [(b)(1) of the FOIA] 8-2 Release would disclose internal personnel rules and practices of an agency [(b)(2) of the FOIA] 8-3 Release would violate a Federal statute [(b)(3) of the FOIA] 8-4 Release would disclose trade secrets or confidential or financial information [(b)(4) of the FOIA] 8-6 Release would constitute a clearly unwarranted Invasion of personal privacy [(b)(6) of the FOIA] 8·7 Release would disclose Information compiled for law enforcement purposes [(b)(7) of the FOIA] 8-8 Release would disclose information concerning the regulation of financial institutions [(b)(8) of the FOIA] B·9 Release would disclose geological or geophysical information concerning wells [(b)(9) of the FOIA] C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Nations
    A Tale of Two Nations Trudeau's jolly progressivism and America's revival will bring back the brain drain Conrad Black – National Post – January 13, 2018 Canada voted to change governments just a year before the United States did and the countries are taking more divergent policy tracks than at any time since Pierre Trudeau warned Ronald Reagan that his proposed missile defence system was destabilizing. (It was, in the sense that the Soviet Union collapsed, the Cold War ended, and there was only one superpower left in the world.) All indications from both governments are that the NAFTA free trade talks are not going well. It is time to recognize that Canada got a very good deal in free trade with the U.S., thanks in large part to the very high esteem then-prime minister Brian Mulroney earned with president Reagan and president George H.W. Bush. He was widely criticized at the time for being a White House lap dog, but in fact, he recognized that with the United States at the height of its preeminence in the world, the only way for Canada to have any influence was to be taken seriously by Washington. No Canadian leader ever had higher credibility with an American administration than Brian Mulroney, and Canada gained from that. Margaret Thatcher and Brian Mulroney were by far the most highly regarded foreign leaders in Washington at that time, and when Mrs. Thatcher retired in 1990, that left Mulroney without a rival. (Both spoke at Reagan’s state funeral, by request of the deceased, the first time any such occurrence had happened.) Mindful of the problems between Trudeau and Reagan, and of the domestic political backlash against Mulroney’s popularity in the White House, Jean Chrétien was correct but not close with the Clinton administration, and visited 34 capitals before he got round to Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Brian Mulroney: the Man to Beat by Tom Velk in November 1993, My
    Brian Mulroney: The Man to Beat By Tom Velk Tom is a co-director of McGill’s North American Studies Program, McGill University. The longer paper upon which this essay is built was co-authored with Al Riggs, the other co-director of North American Studies. In November 1993, my colleague Al Riggs and I published a comparative study of Canadian Prime Ministers since the end of World War II, and concluded that Brian Mulroney had the best economic record since Louis St. Laurent. We have updated our study to include the Chretien years. Mr. Chretien is still in office. His term is incomplete. But his objective record does not fare well in our statistical comparison, where a PM earns points not for basking in good times but for improving his inherited situation; for doing a better job than his competitor in the Oval Office; for showing a upward trend in desirable numbers during his term; and for making a difference in the later development of Canada. When we crunch the numbers to measure by these standards, Mr. Mulroney still has the best economic ranking of any Prime Minister in recent times, and Mr. Chretien ranks last, closely trailed by Mr. Trudeau. Canada’s current Prime Minister is regarded as having a good economic record. After all, Canada is now running a surplus, it boasts low inflation, and unemployment is down significantly since 1993. We are not saying Canada is in terrible shape: it isn’t. But if “did you make substantial improvements to the numbers you inherited?” is the test, Mr.
    [Show full text]