The Brighton and Hove Summary Lists of Listed Buildings ENS/CR/LB/03
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Heritage-Statement
Document Information Cover Sheet ASITE DOCUMENT REFERENCE: WSP-EV-SW-RP-0088 DOCUMENT TITLE: Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’: Final version submitted for planning REVISION: F01 PUBLISHED BY: Jessamy Funnell – WSP on behalf of PMT PUBLISHED DATE: 03/10/2011 OUTLINE DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS ON CONTENT: Uploaded by WSP on behalf of PMT. Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’ ES Chapter: Final version, submitted to BHCC on 23rd September as part of the planning application. This document supersedes: PMT-EV-SW-RP-0001 Chapter 6 ES - Cultural Heritage WSP-EV-SW-RP-0073 ES Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage - Appendices Chapter 6 BSUH September 2011 6 Cultural Heritage 6.A INTRODUCTION 6.1 This chapter assesses the impact of the Proposed Development on heritage assets within the Site itself together with five Conservation Areas (CA) nearby to the Site. 6.2 The assessment presented in this chapter is based on the Proposed Development as described in Chapter 3 of this ES, and shown in Figures 3.10 to 3.17. 6.3 This chapter (and its associated figures and appendices) is not intended to be read as a standalone assessment and reference should be made to the Front End of this ES (Chapters 1 – 4), as well as Chapter 21 ‘Cumulative Effects’. 6.B LEGISLATION, POLICY AND GUIDANCE Legislative Framework 6.4 This section provides a summary of the main planning policies on which the assessment of the likely effects of the Proposed Development on cultural heritage has been made, paying particular attention to policies on design, conservation, landscape and the historic environment. -
AMON WILDS ❋ Invitation, and Should Reply in in a Press Cuttings’ Album in Our Archive There Is One from the Order to Ensure Their Place
Regency Review CONSIDERING THE PAST…FRAMING THE FUTURE THE NEWSLETTER OF THE REGENCY SOCIETY ISSUE 19 NOVEMBER 2007 Murky Waters and Economical Truths y now Members will know that the Society did not The Council went on to say: Bproceed to a Judicial Review of the Council’s planning “Officers answered questions from Members about the Council’s decision on the King Alfred. It was a difficult decision to make role as landowner and whether the developer could have recourse not least because we had delays in obtaining information from to civil remedies if the Council amended its earlier decision. Since the City Council. such questions were raised, officers had a duty to answer them Following the reconfirmation of the Labour administration’s honestly and fairly. In responding to such questions officers decision by the new Conservative-led one, we sought emphasised that while members should be aware of the Council’s further advice from our planning barrister and a top planning wider role as landowner, which related largely to commercial solicitor. We had two principal objectives. These were to see matters, such matters fell outside the planning process. whether we were likely to obtain a ruling in the courts that Members were told that detailed discussions had taken place the previous decision was unsound and, if it was quashed, to with the developer over a long period of time and the developer open the way for a new planning decision, refusing consent. had incurred considerable costs in bringing the proposed scheme Counsel’s advice was that we had an arguable case concerning forward and working it up to its current stage. -
East Cliff Conservation Area Study and Enhancement Plan
EAST CLIFF CONSERVATION AREA STUDY AND ENHANCEMENT PLAN Director Of Environment September 2002 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 East Cliff was designated as a conservation area in February 1973 in recognition of it being an area of special architectural and historic interest, due to its clear association with the growth of Brighton as a Regency and Victorian seaside resort. The conservation area was confirmed as “outstanding” by the Secretary of State for the Environment in January 1974. It was then extended to the north in January 1977, June 1989 and June 1991. East Cliff covers an area of approximately 60 hectares and contains 589 statutory listed buildings plus 86 buildings on the local list. 1.2 This document contains an appraisal of the special architectural and historic interest of the conservation area, which is based upon a summary of the history and development of the area. It then goes on to recommend extensions to the boundary of the conservation area, under the terms of Section 69(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. Part five of the Study identifies buildings of local interest and buildings and sites which detract from the area. The Enhancement Plan aspect of this document has been prepared under Section 71 of the above-mentioned Act and sets out action that should be taken in order to preserve and enhance the special character and appearance of the area. 1.3 No estimate exists of the population of East Cliff as it covers parts of two separate wards and neighbourhoods. However, it has been estimated by the council that there are in the region of 10,500 households in the conservation area. -
Industrial Archaeology Tour Notes for Sussex
Association for Industrial Archaeology Annual Conference Brighton 2015 Industrial Archaeology Tour Notes for Sussex Compiled and Edited by Robert Taylor Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Welcome to Sussex We trust you will enjoy the tours which extend across the county from Goodwood in the west to Hastings in the east and north to Gatwick. We have tried to fit as many visits as possible, but as a consequence the timings for all the tours are tight, so please ensure you return to the coach no later than the time stated by the tour leader and note any instructions they or the driver may give. Most of the places that we visit are either public open spaces or sites, buildings, or structures that are open to the public on a regular basis. Please be aware that all tour members have a responsibility to conduct themselves in a safe and appropriate manner, so do take care when boarding or alighting from vehicles, particularly if crossing in front of or behind the vehicle where one’s view may be obstructed. Similarly care should be exercised when ascending or descending steps or steep slopes and paths that may additionally be slippery when wet. Where we are visiting a site that is not usually open to the public, further instructions will be provided by the Tour Guide when we get to the site. Our best wishes for enjoyable time Committee of the Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society To assist with identifying the sites while on the bus tours the Field Guide / Gazetteer booklet references are included in the notes for each tour. -
Places of Worship in Georgian and Regency Brighton and Hove’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
Sue Berry, ‘Places of worship in Georgian and Regency Brighton and Hove’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XIX, 2011, pp. 157–172 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2011 PLACES OF WORSHIP IN GEORGIAN AND REGENCY BRIGHTON AND HOVE C . – SUE BERRY Between and , the number of places of whereas Lewes had , residents and six parish worship in the flourishing resort of Brighton and churches and Chichester , residents, eight Hove increased from four to about forty, most of which parish churches and a cathedral. The writer believed were built after . The provision for Anglican that Brighton needed at least four more Anglican worshippers before was limited to two old parish churches, calculating that one church would serve churches and a seasonally open chapel of ease. By , people. He claimed that, because of the lack of the total number of buildings and sittings offered by provision by the Church of England, dissenting Nonconformist places of worship had outnumbered groups would flourish, and he drew attention to the those for Anglicans. Their simple buildings were closure of the St James’s Street Chapel (see below), located on cheaper land behind streets or along minor an Anglican free chapel opened by some local streets. But from Anglicans and Nonconformists gentlemen in because neither the Vicar of started building larger places of worship on major Brighton nor the Bishop of Chichester would streets, and some of these striking buildings still survive. support it. Though there were already some fifteen nonconformist places of worship, most of which had rom around the small town of Brighton was free seats, the outburst did not result in any Fsaved from a long period of decline by the immediate change, and in this respect Brighton was development of seaside tourism, attracting increasing typical of other fast-growing towns in which the numbers of wealthy visitors and residents and many Church of England did little to attract worshippers people who provided the wide range of services that until the s. -
Statement of Consultation City Plan Part Two Scoping Report
City Plan Part Two Scoping Report Statement of Consultation January 2017 (Updated June 2018) Statement of Consultation – City Plan Part Two Scoping Consultation Statement of Representations Made and Main Issues Raised (Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Role of the Document ................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Compliance with Statement of Community Involvement .......................................... 2 2. City Plan Part Two Scoping Consultation .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 City Plan Part Two Scoping Paper ............................................................................... 3 i) When the Scoping Paper was published........................................................................ 3 ii) The Consultation Documents ........................................................................................ 3 iii) Where the consultation documents were made available .......................................... 4 iv) Notification of Consultation ......................................................................................... 4 v) Media ........................................................................................................................... -
Sue Berry, 'A Resort Town Transformed: Brighton C.1815–1840'
Sue Berry, ‘A resort town transformed: Brighton c.1815–1840’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXIII, 2015, pp. 213–230 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2015 A RESORT TOWN TRANSFORMED: BRIGHTON c. ‒ SUE BERRY Most of the elegant terraces, squares and crescents in Brighton, Dale accepted the common view that it modern Brighton and Hove were begun between about was a mere fishing village before the Prince of Wales and . The majority were built along the arrived in . More recent research has emphasised sweeping bay on which this resort stands. The first aim that Brighton was not a village but a town, albeit a of this article is to summarise recent research which small and poor one, which was regenerated by expands and revises major parts of Anthony Dale’s seaside tourism from the s. By the time the Fashionable Brighton ‒ ( ). This Prince arrived it was already a popular, rapidly pioneering work formed part of a campaign to save growing resort, aided by good access to London and Adelaide Crescent and Brunswick Town from starting to expand onto agricultural land. demolition and to raise the profile of other coastal Dale thought that the development of the town developments to help protect them. The second aim is to before about had little influence on the location draw attention to the importance of other extensive, and scale of the projects that he described. But deeds and expensive, improvements which were essential to and other sources have since revealed that the the success of a high-quality resort town during this practices used to buy blocks of strips in the period, but which Dale did not discuss. -
1807 20161223 Strategy Docume
Regency Square Community Partnership Regeneration Strategy for Regency Square “Regency Square contains some of the finest examples of Regency architecture in Brighton. Built between 1818 and 1828 on a site known as Belle Vue Field, it is assumed to be the work of Amon Wilds and his son, Amon Henry Wilds, and was financed by Joshua Flesher Hanson as a speculative venture.” www.mybrightonandhove.org.uk Introduction Regency Square occupies a unique position on the Brighton seafront. On an axis with the West Pier, it has been a central part of Brighton life for nearly 200 years – and following the development of our newest seafront attraction - the British Airways i360, looks set to retain this key status into the future. There is however a need to renew and reinvigorate the Square to create a garden worthy of the place it occupies in the city's Regency heritage. The garden enriches the lives of the surrounding community, contributes to the wider city objectives, will be sustainable for the long term and complements the world class BA i360 attraction. As part of the planning consent for the BA i360, 1% of ticket revenue must be provided by BA i360 and used to secure “Environmental Renewal, Maintenance and Improvement Works” within the West Pier Area. It is estimated that this fund will direct around £30k per year to Regency Square garden for the lifetime of the BA i360. It is this resource which will support the regeneration of Regency Square as a coherent whole and underpins this proposal. The aim of this document is to set out a strategy for the regeneration of the square which obtains the best value from identified funding, includes proactive and collaborative engagement with the local Regency Square and wider Brighton and Hove community, and acts as a lever to generate and direct community capital and additional funding and sponsorship resources into the improvement of the square. -
The Tabernacle 1816-1829
Christ Church, Lewes United Reformed and Methodist The Tabernacle 1816-1829 Cliff Geering 200th Anniversary of the Tabernacle congregation 6 November 2016 Transcribed, edited and up-dated by Nick Armstrong, Alan Pett and David Smith Additional research and bibliography by Norman Vance November 2016 ©Christ Church Lewes This booklet has been derived from the notes and research papers left by Cliff Geering, who died in 1993 and was Church secretary from 1972 to 1977. They were given to the Church by his daughter Dorothy. This booklet is one of a series describing the Tabernacle, another gives an account of the Cliffe Chapel, the first Congregational Church in Lewes. They are published as part of the celebration of the 200th Anniversary of the founding of the Tabernacle congregation in 1816. The original sources used in the booklets are the minute and vestry books of the church, surviving letters and legal documents, and pieces published in the local press. These form part of the East Sussex Record Office collection deposited in The Keep, Woollards Way, Brighton, BN1 9BP. [[email protected]] Lewes at the beginning of the nineteenth century In the years after the Battle of Waterloo Lewes was even more of a county town than it is today. Most of it lay within the bounds of its ancient walls and much of that area was garden, orchard or paddock. Some houses followed the cobbled High Street beyond Westgate into St Anne’s; others reached past Eastgate and the Friars to the river. Over the bridge, the picturesque but not too healthy Cliffe High Street (or West Street) where the buildings almost touched across the narrow roadway, provided the only approach to the town from the East. -
Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 169 January 2016
Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society - Newsletter Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society Newsletter Number 169 January 2016 Throwing the clay into the tile mould. Society visit to Aldershaw Hand Made Tiles Ltd. in Sedlescombe see the report in this Newsletter. (Malcolm Dawes) 1 Sussex Industrial Archaeology Society - Newsletter Newsletter 169 Contents January 2016 Editorial ......................................................................................................... 2 Forthcoming SIAS Events ............................................................................. 3 Events from Other Societies .......................................................................... 4 Society visit to Aldershaw Hand Made Tiles ................................................. 7 Coultershaw Trust News ................................................................................ 6 Pottery, Bricks and Tiles in and Around Burgess Hill - Talk ......................... 8 IA Notes for a Tour of Brighton ................................................................... 10 Guide to the Industrial Archaeology of Sussex ........................................... 20 A Mid-Nineteenth Century Corrugated Iron Building ................................. 20 Another challenging Mystery Image ........................................................... 21 Report on Recording and Endangered Sites ................................................ 21 Mystery Photo and Update .......................................................................... 22 Editorial -
Heritage at Risk Register 2020, London and South East
London & South East Register 2020 HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / LONDON AND SOUTH EAST Contents The Register IV Hastings 136 Lewes 138 Content and criteria IV Rother 138 Key statistics VI South Downs (NP) 139 Wealden 141 Key to the Entries VII Hampshire 142 Entries on the Register by local planning IX authority Basingstoke and Deane 142 East Hampshire 143 Greater London 1 Fareham 143 Barking and Dagenham 1 Gosport 144 Barnet 2 Hart 146 Bexley 3 Havant 147 Brent 4 New Forest 147 Bromley 6 New Forest (NP) 148 Camden 11 Rushmoor 149 City of London 17 Test Valley 152 Croydon 18 Winchester 154 Ealing 21 Isle of Wight (UA) 156 Enfield 23 Greenwich 27 Kent 161 Hackney 30 Ashford 161 Hammersmith and Fulham 37 Canterbury 162 Haringey 40 Dartford 164 Harrow 43 Dover 164 Havering 47 Folkestone and Hythe 167 Hillingdon 49 Maidstone 169 Hounslow 57 Sevenoaks 171 Islington 62 Swale 172 Kensington and Chelsea 67 Thanet 174 Kingston upon Thames 77 Tonbridge and Malling 176 Lambeth 79 Tunbridge Wells 177 Lewisham 87 Kent (off) 177 London Legacy (MDC) 91 Medway (UA) 178 Merton 92 Newham 96 Milton Keynes (UA) 181 Redbridge 99 Oxfordshire 182 Richmond upon Thames 100 Southwark 103 Cherwell 182 Sutton 110 Oxford 183 Tower Hamlets 112 South Oxfordshire 184 Waltham Forest 118 Vale of White Horse 186 Wandsworth 121 West Oxfordshire 188 Westminster, City of 123 Portsmouth, City of (UA) 189 Bracknell Forest (UA) 127 Reading (UA) 192 Brighton and Hove, City of (UA) 127 Southampton, City of (UA) 193 South Downs (NP) 130 Surrey 194 Buckinghamshire (UA) 131 Elmbridge 194 -
The Brighton and Hove Summary Lists of Historic Buildings ENS/CR/LB/03
PLANNING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION Heritage Team Brighton & Hove City Council Hove Town Hall Norton Road Hove BN3 3BQ Tel: (01273) 29 2271 Fax: 29 2350 E-mail: [email protected] Website http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk The Brighton and Hove Summary Lists of Historic Buildings ENS/CR/LB/03 18 May 2012 STREET Number Name Side Odd/ Grade Date Even Listed The Chattri, A23, Brighton See under A27 A27, Brighton The Chattri at NGR TQ 304 103, on North of II 20/08/71 land north of A27 Road and east of A23 Lamp post at the east end of Great East II 26/08/99 ABBEY ROAD, Brighton College Street 17 and 19 See under No. 53 Great College Street Pearson House See under Nos 12, 13 and 14 Portland Place Retaining wall to S side of gardens in South II 02/11/92 ADELAIDE CRESCENT, front of Adelaide Crescent Hove Ten lamp posts II 02/11/92 Walls, ramps and stairways on South South II* 05/05/69 front of terrace 1-19 and attached walls and railings East Consecutive II* 24/03/50 20-38 and attached walls and railings West Consecutive II* 24/03/50 1 White Knights and attached walls and East II 10/09/71 ALBANY VILLAS, Hove piers 2 and 4 including walls and railings West II 10/09/71 3 and 5 East II 10/09/71 Church of St Bartholomew North I 13/10/52 ANN STREET, Brighton Arundel Place Mews Nos.11 & 12 and East II 26/08/99 ARUNDEL PLACE, attached walls and piers Brighton Arundel Place Mews Units 2, 3, 4, 8, East of II 26/08/99 8A & 9 Lamp post - in front of No.10 East II 26/08/99 NB some properties on Arundel Place may be listed as part of properties on Lewes Crescent or Arundel Terrace.