Heritage at Risk Register 2020, London and South East
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
London & South East Register 2020 HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / LONDON AND SOUTH EAST Contents The Register IV Hastings 136 Lewes 138 Content and criteria IV Rother 138 Key statistics VI South Downs (NP) 139 Wealden 141 Key to the Entries VII Hampshire 142 Entries on the Register by local planning IX authority Basingstoke and Deane 142 East Hampshire 143 Greater London 1 Fareham 143 Barking and Dagenham 1 Gosport 144 Barnet 2 Hart 146 Bexley 3 Havant 147 Brent 4 New Forest 147 Bromley 6 New Forest (NP) 148 Camden 11 Rushmoor 149 City of London 17 Test Valley 152 Croydon 18 Winchester 154 Ealing 21 Isle of Wight (UA) 156 Enfield 23 Greenwich 27 Kent 161 Hackney 30 Ashford 161 Hammersmith and Fulham 37 Canterbury 162 Haringey 40 Dartford 164 Harrow 43 Dover 164 Havering 47 Folkestone and Hythe 167 Hillingdon 49 Maidstone 169 Hounslow 57 Sevenoaks 171 Islington 62 Swale 172 Kensington and Chelsea 67 Thanet 174 Kingston upon Thames 77 Tonbridge and Malling 176 Lambeth 79 Tunbridge Wells 177 Lewisham 87 Kent (off) 177 London Legacy (MDC) 91 Medway (UA) 178 Merton 92 Newham 96 Milton Keynes (UA) 181 Redbridge 99 Oxfordshire 182 Richmond upon Thames 100 Southwark 103 Cherwell 182 Sutton 110 Oxford 183 Tower Hamlets 112 South Oxfordshire 184 Waltham Forest 118 Vale of White Horse 186 Wandsworth 121 West Oxfordshire 188 Westminster, City of 123 Portsmouth, City of (UA) 189 Bracknell Forest (UA) 127 Reading (UA) 192 Brighton and Hove, City of (UA) 127 Southampton, City of (UA) 193 South Downs (NP) 130 Surrey 194 Buckinghamshire (UA) 131 Elmbridge 194 Epsom and Ewell 194 East Sussex 135 Guildford 195 Eastbourne 135 Mole Valley 195 II HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / LONDON AND SOUTH EAST Reigate and Banstead 197 Runnymede 197 Spelthorne 197 Tandridge 198 Waverley 198 Woking 198 West Berkshire (UA) 199 West Sussex 202 Adur 202 Arun 202 Chichester 202 Horsham 204 Mid Sussex 205 South Downs (NP) 205 Worthing 209 Windsor and Maidenhead (UA) 209 Wokingham (UA) 210 III HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / LONDON AND SOUTH EAST THE REGISTER Many structures fall into the ‘not applicable’ category, The Heritage at Risk Register includes historic for example: ruins, walls, gates, headstones or boundary buildings and sites at risk of being lost through stones. neglect, decay or deterioration. Condition is assessed as ‘very bad’, ‘poor’, ‘fair’ or It includes all types of designated heritage assets, ‘good’. The condition of buildings or structures on including Conservation Areas, which are designated the Register is typically very bad or poor, but can be and assessed by Local Planning Authorities. fair or, very occasionally, good. This reflects the fact that some buildings or structures are vulnerable The aim of the Register is to focus attention on because they are empty, underused or face those places in greatest need. Historic England, in redundancy without a new use to secure their partnership with others, is able to help tackle future. Assessing vulnerability in the case of buildings heritage at risk. We work with owners, friends in fair condition necessarily involves judgement and groups, developers and other stakeholders to find discretion. A few buildings remain on the Register in imaginative solutions for historic places and sites at good condition, having been repaired or mothballed, risk across England. but still awaiting a new use or occupancy. More information about our role, the advice and Buildings or structures are removed from the funding available, and useful publications and Register when they are fully repaired/consolidated, guidance is available on our website. and their future secured either through occupation and use, or through the adoption of appropriate Criteria for inclusion management. on the Register PLACES OF WORSHIP To be considered for inclusion on the Register, places RISK ASSESSMENTS of worship must be listed grade I, grade II* or grade II on the National Heritage List for England, and be used Heritage assets included on the Register are assessed as a public place of worship at least six times a year. according to the nature of the site. The risk assessment methodologies outlined below are based Places of worship are assessed on the basis of on factors which can threaten the different types of condition only. If a place of worship is in very bad or heritage assets and lead to them becoming at risk. poor condition, it is added to the Register. This includes places of worship which are generally in fair BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES or good condition but have major problems with one key element, like the tower. To be considered for inclusion on the Register, buildings or structures must be: Once on the Register, places of worship can move through the condition categories (e.g. from very bad • listed on the National Heritage List for England; to poor, to fair, even good) as repairs are and implemented and the condition improves, until they • in secular (non-worship) use. are fully repaired and can be removed from the And either: Register. This means that there are some places of • a grade I or II* listed building, or worship in good condition on the Register but with • a grade II listed building in London, or outstanding issues still to be resolved at the time when • a structural scheduled monument with they were assessed. upstanding remains. ARCHAEOLOGY Buildings or structures are assessed on the basis of condition and, where applicable, occupancy (or use) To be considered for inclusion on the Register, reflecting the fact that a building which is occupied archaeological sites must be listed as scheduled is generally less vulnerable than one that is not. monuments and included on the National Heritage List for England. Occupancy (or use) is assessed as ‘vacant’, ‘part- occupied’, ‘occupied’, ‘not applicable’, or occasionally, Archaeology assessments cover scheduled ‘unknown’. earthworks and buried archaeology. IVIII HERITAGE AT RISK 2020 / LONDON AND SOUTH EAST The risk assessment is based on their condition and Wreck sites are assessed based on their current vulnerability, the trend in their condition, and their condition, vulnerability and the way they are being likely future vulnerability. A site’s condition is managed. expressed in terms of the scale and severity of adverse effects on it, ranging from ‘extensive Wrecks are vulnerable to both environmental and significant problems’ to ‘minor localised problems’. human impacts. Risks that contribute to inclusion on the Register range from unauthorised access to Archaeological entries are removed from the erosion and fishing damage. The monitoring process Register once sufficient progress has been made to ensures that the significance of the site is identified address the identified issues, and a significant and maintained. In spite of the inherent difficulties in reduction in the level of risk has been demonstrated. caring for this type of site, careful management must be maintained. PARKS AND GARDENS Wrecks are removed from the Register once an To be considered for inclusion on the Register, parks appropriate management and monitoring regime and gardens must be listed as grade I, grade II* or is operational. grade II and included on the National Heritage List for England. Parks and gardens are assessed in terms of CONSERVATION AREAS condition and vulnerability. Steps being taken by owners to address problems are also taken into Once a year Historic England asks every local consideration. authority in England to consider the state of its conservation areas and fill in (and update as Parks and gardens assessed as being at risk are typically appropriate) risk assessment questionnaires for affected by development and neglect. They have those that cause concern, or are believed to no frequently been altered by development or are faced longer be at risk. with major change. The original function of these landscapes has often changed and divided ownership Conservation areas that are deteriorating, or are in leads to the loss of their cohesive historic design. very bad or poor condition and not expected to change significantly in the next three years, are Park and garden entries are removed from the defined as being at risk. Register once steps have been taken to address issues and positive progress is being made. The approach taken to assess conservation areas at risk has been refined since the first survey in 2008/2009. An BATTLEFIELDS overall category for condition, vulnerability and trend is included for each conservation area on the Heritage at To be considered for inclusion on the Register, Risk Register. Conservation areas identified as at risk in battlefields must be listed and included on the 2009, but not reassessed since using the revised National Heritage List for England. Battlefields methodology, are included on the Register but with deemed to be at risk of loss of cultural significance limited information. are included on the Register. Conservation areas are removed from the Register The principal risks and threats are: once plans have been put in place to address the • development pressure e.g. issues that led to the conservation area being at risk, encroachment of buildings; and once positive progress is being made. • pressures of particular use within the site e.g. arable cultivation; THE EFFECT OF COVID-19 ON THE • damage e.g. unregulated metal detecting. COLLECTION AND COLLATION OF Battlefields are removed from the Register either THE STATISTICS USED FOR THE 2020 when damaging activities cease/are managed, or when REGISTERS threats recede due to effective planning. The collection of this year’s data has been affected by WRECK SITES Covid-19. From the onset of ‘lockdown’ site visits were not possible for either our staff or local authority To be considered for inclusion on the Register, colleagues, meaning that the usual level of on-site wrecks must be listed and included on the National checking of existing or proposed entries on/for the Heritage List for England.