DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Statement Heritage Statement The Heritage Statement is for the applicant or agent to identify the heritage asset(s) that have the potential to be affected by the proposals and their setting. Please read the guidance notes provided at the back of this report to help you fill in the form correctly. https://www.brighton- hove.gov.uk/content/planning/heritage/heritage-statements Appendix 1 relates to the Historic Environment Record (HER) Consultation Report. You must state whether or not supporting data from the HER is required. There are 3 options: • HER report attached (this must be completed by the Historic Environment Record Team) • HER report not considered necessary – email attached from HER • HER report not required by the Local Planning Authority as detailed on the relevant website validation requirements Please tick the relevant box at the back of this form as to which option applies. Both the Heritage Statement and the Historic Environment Record Consultation report (Appendix 1) must be completed in order to meet validation requirements of the Local Planning Authority – tick the boxes on the right hand side below to confirm the sections completed. Note: All fields are mandatory. Failure to fully complete all fields may result in the form not being validated by the Local Planning Authority (LPA). To be completed by the applicant – please tick relevant boxes 1. Heritage Statement completed x 2. Appendix 1 completed 1 Heritage Statement Site name Flat 15, 59-62 regents court Address of site Flat 15 (including postcode) 59-62 regents court Regency Square Brighton BN1 2FF Grid Reference 1. Schedule of Works Please state the type of proposal e.g. extension to a listed building, internal alterations Internal alteration to a second storey flat layout to create one bedroom. The works were completed with planning permission granted in 1992 with the previous leasehold owner. Please list the works proposed e.g. replacement windows, removal of internal wall, reinstatement of original staircase, damp proofing works to basement etc. The erection of a partition wall using painted plasterboard on timber studwork, with painted plain unmoulded timber skirtings and ogee architrave, which is in keeping with the flats design/features. The works were completed with planning permission granted in 1992 with the previous leasehold owner. 2 2. Pre Application Advice Have you consulted the East Sussex Historic Environment Record, as the minimum requirement of the NPPF? ☐ Yes ☒ No If no, please provide the reasons why not below, including any correspondence with the HER/LPA archaeological advisor or LPA validation team: These works were completed by the previous leasehold owner in 1992, we believed consent was given for these works until it was bought to our attention recently as we are selling the property. If Yes, please attach any correspondence to this Heritage Statement in Appendix 1 (including the HER Consultation Report) Have you sought pre-application heritage advice from the relevant local planning authority? ☐ Yes ☒ No If Yes, please provide a copy of any written correspondence with reference number/contact name if applicable. Have you sought pre-application heritage advice from Historic England? ☐ Yes ☒ No If Yes, please provide a copy of any written correspondence with reference number/contact name if applicable. 3 3. What heritage asset(s), including their setting, are potentially affected by the proposals? (Please tick the relevant boxes below) (See guidance section: https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/content/planning/heritage/heritage-statements- what-heritage-assets-are-affected-proposals) 1: Scheduled Monument (SM) ☐ 2. Listed Building (LB) ☒ 3. Conservation Area (CA) ☒ 4. Registered Park and Garden (RPG) ☐ 5. Historic Battlefield (HB) ☐ 6. Locally Listed Heritage Asset (LLHA) ☐ 7. Archaeological Notification Area (ANA) ☐ 8 Other Non-Designated Heritage Asset (including below ground ☐ archaeology) 4. What is known about the affected heritage asset(s)? (See guidance section: https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/content/planning/heritage/heritage-statements-what-known- about-affected-heritage-assets ) 4 (a). Using the information obtained through research and on-site analysis provide a summary of the history of the site/building. Please add a summary history of the site/building including specifically the parts that will be impacted by the proposals – e.g. how the site/building was originally laid out, how it has evolved, phases of construction and/or change. Please also provide information on past impacts – e.g. modern extension, drainage, former footings, recent landscaping, gardening. Please include / attach any research material as an addendum to this Statement after Appendix 1. 4 In the 18th century, Belle Vue Field was an open site to the west of the town, the scene of military encampments described by Jane Austen in Pride and Prejudice. The field was bought by Joshua Hanson, who laid out the square and, from 1818-28, sold individual plots subject to covenants requiring facades of an approved design. Most of these designs were provided by Amon Wilds and his son, and their quality is reflected in their listing at grade II*. To the sides of the square, the houses are three or four storeys with basement, but the north elevation is a palace front of five storeys, the central pair bearing a pediment inscribed 'Regency Square' in large letters. As with Russell Square, the original materials were yellow brick with stucco dressings, but most have since been painted. A setted crossover in the pavement between Nos.42 and 43 indicates where there used to be a carriage arch leading to the mews, which has since been infilled. The railings are a distinctive design with conical tops. To the northeast is the Regency Tavern. Established in the mid-19th century in the rear third of the present premises, it has since expanded into two adjoining houses. Adjacent is an alleyway, once called Regency Colonnade, leading to Russell Square. In it are two listed bollards of fluted design. Leading south is Queensbury Mews in which five modern mews houses at the rear of Regency Square properties face the rear of the Metropole Exhibition Halls. At the southern end, however, there is a small redbrick French Protestant Church built in 1887. The only other of its kind is in Soho Square, London. The southern end also has distinctive channels to the carriageway formed of rectangular setts laid at right angles to the kerb. The West Pier was built axially to Regency Square, and there are wide views over the pier and of the sea beyond. In the 1960s, surface car parking was proposed on the gardens of the square, but this became an underground carpark, opened in 1969, and the present terraced lawns form its roof. As with the other squares, the original railings were removed for the war effort and these were eventually replaced with more utilitarian hooped steel railings. There are also square-tube railings at the entrances to the carpark, which intrude on the landscape. The mid-20th century lamp-posts are cast-iron imitations of gas standards modified with swan-necks for electrification. At the south end of the square is the Royal Sussex Regiment War Memorial. The bronze figure of a bugler on a tall Portland stone plinth was unveiled in 1904. 59-62 Regents Court consists of four grade II* listed buildings that form part of a consistent listed terrace on the east side of Regency Square, which is arranged on three sides around a central public garden. They date from c1818 and were probably designed by Amon Wilds and Amon Henry Wilds. The buildings vary between four and five storeys over basement. Originally townhouses, numbers 59-62 have been combined into flats and the internal layout has been much altered, with communal corridors and lift. This application relates to Flat 15 within number 61, which is a second storey flat. We consider the aesthetic values described above to be a principal contributor to the significance of Regency Square. In common with many of these once very grand family homes, the interior of this flat has been heavily subdivided and altered in the past. Regents Court consists of four houses that have been combined to form flats and the internal arrangement of the buildings has been much altered as a result of this, including the installation of a lift and the formation of linking communal hallways.5 4 (b) What research have you undertaken to understand the significance of the heritage asset(s) affected? Please tick the relevant boxes HER ☒ The Keep (East Sussex Record Office) ☐ Map regression (historic maps) ☐ Local Planning Authority sources ☐ Historic England sources ☒ Museum or Library (please provide details) ☐ Other (please state) ☒ (Please include / attach any research material as an addendum to this Statement after Appendix 1.) 5. What is important about the affected heritage asset(s) (‘the significance’)? (See guidance section: https://www.brighton- hove.gov.uk/content/planning/heritage/heritage-statements-what-important-about-affected- heritage-assets ) Use this space to describe the significance of the heritage asset(s) including their setting (and any below ground archaeology) identified in Section 3. Please see the guidance notes on page 9 on what a heritage asset is and how to define significance. (Please continue on a separate sheet of paper if further space is required and attach / include as an addendum to this Statement after Appendix 1.) The age of the square highlights the rich history dating back to the 18th century when the square was developed. The square provides architectural history of the regency era, highlighting craftsmanship, materials, features and decoration of the buildings. The building out of plots of land by developer-builders ensured at once both unity in architectural composition and yet a diversity of stylistic features. The result is an eclecticism of set-piece squares, crescents and palace fronted terraces with bows, verandas, pilasters and pedimented palace fronts all drawn together by their distinctive stucco fronts and decorative railings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hove and the Great
    H o v e a n d t h e Gre a t Wa r A RECORD AND A R E VIE W together with the R oll o f Ho n o u r and Li st o f D i sti n c tio n s By H . M . WALBROOK ’ Im ied una er toe a u fbority cftfie Hov e Wa r Memorial Com m ittee Hove Sussex Th e Cliftonville Press 1 9 2 0 H o v e a n d t h e Gre a t Wa r A RECORD AND A REVIEW together with the R o ll o f Ho n o u r and Li st o f D i sti n c tio n s BY H . M . WALBROOK ’ In ned u nner toe a u tbority oftbe Have Wa r Memoria l Comm ittee Hove Sussex The Cliftonville Press 1 9 2 0 the Powers militant That stood for Heaven , in mighty quadrate joined Of union irresistible , moved on In silence their bright legions, to the sound Of instrumental harmony, that breathed Heroic ardour to adventurous deeds, Under their godlike leaders, in the cause O f ” God and His Messiah . J oan Milton. Fore word HAVE been asked to write a “ Foreword to this book ; personally I think the book speaks for itself. Representations have been ’ made from time to time that a record o fHove s share in the Great War should be published, and the idea having been put before the public meeting of the inhabitants called in April last to consider the question of a War Memorial , the publication became part, although a very minor part, of the scheme .
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage-Statement
    Document Information Cover Sheet ASITE DOCUMENT REFERENCE: WSP-EV-SW-RP-0088 DOCUMENT TITLE: Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’: Final version submitted for planning REVISION: F01 PUBLISHED BY: Jessamy Funnell – WSP on behalf of PMT PUBLISHED DATE: 03/10/2011 OUTLINE DESCRIPTION/COMMENTS ON CONTENT: Uploaded by WSP on behalf of PMT. Environmental Statement Chapter 6 ‘Cultural Heritage’ ES Chapter: Final version, submitted to BHCC on 23rd September as part of the planning application. This document supersedes: PMT-EV-SW-RP-0001 Chapter 6 ES - Cultural Heritage WSP-EV-SW-RP-0073 ES Chapter 6: Cultural Heritage - Appendices Chapter 6 BSUH September 2011 6 Cultural Heritage 6.A INTRODUCTION 6.1 This chapter assesses the impact of the Proposed Development on heritage assets within the Site itself together with five Conservation Areas (CA) nearby to the Site. 6.2 The assessment presented in this chapter is based on the Proposed Development as described in Chapter 3 of this ES, and shown in Figures 3.10 to 3.17. 6.3 This chapter (and its associated figures and appendices) is not intended to be read as a standalone assessment and reference should be made to the Front End of this ES (Chapters 1 – 4), as well as Chapter 21 ‘Cumulative Effects’. 6.B LEGISLATION, POLICY AND GUIDANCE Legislative Framework 6.4 This section provides a summary of the main planning policies on which the assessment of the likely effects of the Proposed Development on cultural heritage has been made, paying particular attention to policies on design, conservation, landscape and the historic environment.
    [Show full text]
  • AMON WILDS ❋ Invitation, and Should Reply in in a Press Cuttings’ Album in Our Archive There Is One from the Order to Ensure Their Place
    Regency Review CONSIDERING THE PAST…FRAMING THE FUTURE THE NEWSLETTER OF THE REGENCY SOCIETY ISSUE 19 NOVEMBER 2007 Murky Waters and Economical Truths y now Members will know that the Society did not The Council went on to say: Bproceed to a Judicial Review of the Council’s planning “Officers answered questions from Members about the Council’s decision on the King Alfred. It was a difficult decision to make role as landowner and whether the developer could have recourse not least because we had delays in obtaining information from to civil remedies if the Council amended its earlier decision. Since the City Council. such questions were raised, officers had a duty to answer them Following the reconfirmation of the Labour administration’s honestly and fairly. In responding to such questions officers decision by the new Conservative-led one, we sought emphasised that while members should be aware of the Council’s further advice from our planning barrister and a top planning wider role as landowner, which related largely to commercial solicitor. We had two principal objectives. These were to see matters, such matters fell outside the planning process. whether we were likely to obtain a ruling in the courts that Members were told that detailed discussions had taken place the previous decision was unsound and, if it was quashed, to with the developer over a long period of time and the developer open the way for a new planning decision, refusing consent. had incurred considerable costs in bringing the proposed scheme Counsel’s advice was that we had an arguable case concerning forward and working it up to its current stage.
    [Show full text]
  • East Sussex Record Office Report of the County Archivist April 2008 to March 2009 Introduction
    eastsussex.gov.uk East Sussex Record Office Report of the County Archivist April 2008 to March 2009 Introduction The year was again dominated by efforts towards achieving The Keep, the new Historical Resource Centre, but the core work of the Record Office continued more busily than ever and there was much of which to be proud. In July 2008 we took in our ten-thousandth accession, something of a milestone in the office’s own history of almost 60 years. An application to the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) for £4.9million towards the costs of The Keep was submitted by the Record Office on behalf of the capital partners, East Sussex County Council, Brighton & Hove City Council and the University of Sussex, in September. This represented around 20% of the anticipated costs of the building, since the partners remain committed to find the remainder. In December we learned our fate: that we had been unsuccessful. Feedback from the HLF indicated that ours had been an exemplary application, and one which they would have liked to have supported but, in a year when the effect of diverting HLF money to the Olympics was being felt, it was thought necessary to give precedence to some very high-profile projects. We were, of course, disappointed, but determined not to be deterred, and the partners agreed to pursue ways forward within the existing funding. Because it would further hold up the project, adding to inflation costs, but give no guarantee of success, we decided not to re-apply to the HLF, and by the end of the financial year were beginning to look at options for a less expensive building.
    [Show full text]
  • Men of Ashdown Forest Who Fell in the First World War and Are
    Men of Ashdown Forest who Fell in the First World War and are Commemorated at Forest Row, Hartfield and Coleman’s Hatch A Collection of Case Studies 1 Published by Ashdown Forest Research Group The Ashdown Forest Centre Wych Cross Forest Row East Sussex RH18 5JP website: http://www.ashdownforest.org/enjoy/history/AshdownResearchGroup.php email: [email protected] First published August 2014 This revised edition published October 2015. © Ashdown Forest Research Group 2 CONTENTS Click on the person’s name to jump to his case study 05 INTRODUCTION 06 Bassett, James Baldwin 08 Biddlecombe, Henry George 11 Brooker, Charles Frederick 13 Edwards, Frederick Robert 17 Fisher, George Kenneth Thompson 19 Fry, Frederick Samuel 21 Heasman, George Henry 23 Heasman, Frederick James 25 Kekewich, John 28 Lawrence, Michael Charles 31 Lawrence, Oliver John 34 Luxford, Edward James 36 Maskell, George 38 Medhurst, John Arthur 40 Mellor, Benjamin Charles 42 Mitchell, Albert 44 Page, Harry 45 Polehampton, Frederick William 50 Robinson, Cyril Charles 51 Robson, Robert Charles 3 53 Sands, Alfred Jesse 55 Sands, William Thomas 57 Shelley, Ewbert John 59 Simmons, James 61 Sippetts, Jack Frederick 63 Sykes, William Ernest 65 Tomsett, Albert Ernest Standen 67 Upton, Albert James 69 Vaughan, Ernest Stanley 70 Waters, Eric Gordon 72 Weeding, George 74 Weeding, John 75 Wheatley, Harry 76 Wheatley, Doctor 78 Wheatley, William James 80 SOURCES AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 Introduction This collection of case studies of Ashdown Forest men who fell during the Great War was first published by Ashdown Forest Research Group to mark the 100th anniversary of the declaration of war by Great Britain on Germany on 4 August 1914, a war which was to have a devastating impact on the communities of Ashdown Forest as it was on the rest of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • COOMBE LEA, GRAND AVENUE, HOVE, EAST SUSSEX, BN3 2NE National Grid N 529019, Reference: E 104608 Site Ref Number: 79854 Site Type:1 Macro
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 1. Site Details Site Name: Coombe Lea RT Site Address: COOMBE LEA, GRAND AVENUE, HOVE, EAST SUSSEX, BN3 2NE National Grid N 529019, Reference: E 104608 Site Ref Number: 79854 Site Type:1 Macro 2. Pre Application Check List Site Selection (for New Sites only) Was a local planning authority mast register available to check Yes No for suitable sites by the operator or the local planning authority? If no explain why: Database not available. Other sources checked. Were industry site databases checked for suitable sites by the Yes No operator: If no explain why: N/A Site Specific Pre-application consultation with local planning authority Was there pre-application contact: No Date of pre-application contact: 08/01/2021 Name of contact: N/A Summary of outcome/Main issues raised: A consultation letter, associated plans and proposed consultation plan were sent to Brighton and Hove City Council on 08/01/2021. A consultation response had not been received at the time of writing. Lines of communication will remain open throughout the application process. Community Consultation Rating of Site under Traffic Light Model: Red Amber Green Outline of consultation carried out: The proposal was rated Amber in accordance with the traffic light consultation model in the Code of Best Practice on Mobile Network Development (published 2016). The pre-application consultation plan adhered to best practice guidance. Pre-application consultation was undertaken with the Council Members for the Ward in which site is located and with the residents of Coombe Lea (84No. apartments). A consultation letter and supporting information was posted or emailed to the consultees on 08/01/2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Places of Worship in Georgian and Regency Brighton and Hove’, the Georgian Group Journal, Vol
    Sue Berry, ‘Places of worship in Georgian and Regency Brighton and Hove’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XIX, 2011, pp. 157–172 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2011 PLACES OF WORSHIP IN GEORGIAN AND REGENCY BRIGHTON AND HOVE C . – SUE BERRY Between and , the number of places of whereas Lewes had , residents and six parish worship in the flourishing resort of Brighton and churches and Chichester , residents, eight Hove increased from four to about forty, most of which parish churches and a cathedral. The writer believed were built after . The provision for Anglican that Brighton needed at least four more Anglican worshippers before was limited to two old parish churches, calculating that one church would serve churches and a seasonally open chapel of ease. By , people. He claimed that, because of the lack of the total number of buildings and sittings offered by provision by the Church of England, dissenting Nonconformist places of worship had outnumbered groups would flourish, and he drew attention to the those for Anglicans. Their simple buildings were closure of the St James’s Street Chapel (see below), located on cheaper land behind streets or along minor an Anglican free chapel opened by some local streets. But from Anglicans and Nonconformists gentlemen in because neither the Vicar of started building larger places of worship on major Brighton nor the Bishop of Chichester would streets, and some of these striking buildings still survive. support it. Though there were already some fifteen nonconformist places of worship, most of which had rom around the small town of Brighton was free seats, the outburst did not result in any Fsaved from a long period of decline by the immediate change, and in this respect Brighton was development of seaside tourism, attracting increasing typical of other fast-growing towns in which the numbers of wealthy visitors and residents and many Church of England did little to attract worshippers people who provided the wide range of services that until the s.
    [Show full text]
  • Sue Berry, 'A Resort Town Transformed: Brighton C.1815–1840'
    Sue Berry, ‘A resort town transformed: Brighton c.1815–1840’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXIII, 2015, pp. 213–230 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2015 A RESORT TOWN TRANSFORMED: BRIGHTON c. ‒ SUE BERRY Most of the elegant terraces, squares and crescents in Brighton, Dale accepted the common view that it modern Brighton and Hove were begun between about was a mere fishing village before the Prince of Wales and . The majority were built along the arrived in . More recent research has emphasised sweeping bay on which this resort stands. The first aim that Brighton was not a village but a town, albeit a of this article is to summarise recent research which small and poor one, which was regenerated by expands and revises major parts of Anthony Dale’s seaside tourism from the s. By the time the Fashionable Brighton ‒ ( ). This Prince arrived it was already a popular, rapidly pioneering work formed part of a campaign to save growing resort, aided by good access to London and Adelaide Crescent and Brunswick Town from starting to expand onto agricultural land. demolition and to raise the profile of other coastal Dale thought that the development of the town developments to help protect them. The second aim is to before about had little influence on the location draw attention to the importance of other extensive, and scale of the projects that he described. But deeds and expensive, improvements which were essential to and other sources have since revealed that the the success of a high-quality resort town during this practices used to buy blocks of strips in the period, but which Dale did not discuss.
    [Show full text]
  • 1807 20161223 Strategy Docume
    Regency Square Community Partnership Regeneration Strategy for Regency Square “Regency Square contains some of the finest examples of Regency architecture in Brighton. Built between 1818 and 1828 on a site known as Belle Vue Field, it is assumed to be the work of Amon Wilds and his son, Amon Henry Wilds, and was financed by Joshua Flesher Hanson as a speculative venture.” www.mybrightonandhove.org.uk Introduction Regency Square occupies a unique position on the Brighton seafront. On an axis with the West Pier, it has been a central part of Brighton life for nearly 200 years – and following the development of our newest seafront attraction - the British Airways i360, looks set to retain this key status into the future. There is however a need to renew and reinvigorate the Square to create a garden worthy of the place it occupies in the city's Regency heritage. The garden enriches the lives of the surrounding community, contributes to the wider city objectives, will be sustainable for the long term and complements the world class BA i360 attraction. As part of the planning consent for the BA i360, 1% of ticket revenue must be provided by BA i360 and used to secure “Environmental Renewal, Maintenance and Improvement Works” within the West Pier Area. It is estimated that this fund will direct around £30k per year to Regency Square garden for the lifetime of the BA i360. It is this resource which will support the regeneration of Regency Square as a coherent whole and underpins this proposal. The aim of this document is to set out a strategy for the regeneration of the square which obtains the best value from identified funding, includes proactive and collaborative engagement with the local Regency Square and wider Brighton and Hove community, and acts as a lever to generate and direct community capital and additional funding and sponsorship resources into the improvement of the square.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tabernacle 1816-1829
    Christ Church, Lewes United Reformed and Methodist The Tabernacle 1816-1829 Cliff Geering 200th Anniversary of the Tabernacle congregation 6 November 2016 Transcribed, edited and up-dated by Nick Armstrong, Alan Pett and David Smith Additional research and bibliography by Norman Vance November 2016 ©Christ Church Lewes This booklet has been derived from the notes and research papers left by Cliff Geering, who died in 1993 and was Church secretary from 1972 to 1977. They were given to the Church by his daughter Dorothy. This booklet is one of a series describing the Tabernacle, another gives an account of the Cliffe Chapel, the first Congregational Church in Lewes. They are published as part of the celebration of the 200th Anniversary of the founding of the Tabernacle congregation in 1816. The original sources used in the booklets are the minute and vestry books of the church, surviving letters and legal documents, and pieces published in the local press. These form part of the East Sussex Record Office collection deposited in The Keep, Woollards Way, Brighton, BN1 9BP. [[email protected]] Lewes at the beginning of the nineteenth century In the years after the Battle of Waterloo Lewes was even more of a county town than it is today. Most of it lay within the bounds of its ancient walls and much of that area was garden, orchard or paddock. Some houses followed the cobbled High Street beyond Westgate into St Anne’s; others reached past Eastgate and the Friars to the river. Over the bridge, the picturesque but not too healthy Cliffe High Street (or West Street) where the buildings almost touched across the narrow roadway, provided the only approach to the town from the East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brighton and Hove Summary Lists of Historic Buildings ENS/CR/LB/03
    PLANNING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION Heritage Team Brighton & Hove City Council Hove Town Hall Norton Road Hove BN3 3BQ Tel: (01273) 29 2271 Fax: 29 2350 E-mail: [email protected] Website http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk The Brighton and Hove Summary Lists of Historic Buildings ENS/CR/LB/03 18 May 2012 STREET Number Name Side Odd/ Grade Date Even Listed The Chattri, A23, Brighton See under A27 A27, Brighton The Chattri at NGR TQ 304 103, on North of II 20/08/71 land north of A27 Road and east of A23 Lamp post at the east end of Great East II 26/08/99 ABBEY ROAD, Brighton College Street 17 and 19 See under No. 53 Great College Street Pearson House See under Nos 12, 13 and 14 Portland Place Retaining wall to S side of gardens in South II 02/11/92 ADELAIDE CRESCENT, front of Adelaide Crescent Hove Ten lamp posts II 02/11/92 Walls, ramps and stairways on South South II* 05/05/69 front of terrace 1-19 and attached walls and railings East Consecutive II* 24/03/50 20-38 and attached walls and railings West Consecutive II* 24/03/50 1 White Knights and attached walls and East II 10/09/71 ALBANY VILLAS, Hove piers 2 and 4 including walls and railings West II 10/09/71 3 and 5 East II 10/09/71 Church of St Bartholomew North I 13/10/52 ANN STREET, Brighton Arundel Place Mews Nos.11 & 12 and East II 26/08/99 ARUNDEL PLACE, attached walls and piers Brighton Arundel Place Mews Units 2, 3, 4, 8, East of II 26/08/99 8A & 9 Lamp post - in front of No.10 East II 26/08/99 NB some properties on Arundel Place may be listed as part of properties on Lewes Crescent or Arundel Terrace.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Gscene Apr2020
    We’re online only this month but still with all the news, updates and features to keep you informed and entertained APR 2020 CONTENTS GSCENE magazine www.gscene.com @gscene LEGENDS GScene.Brighton PUBLISHER Peter Storrow TEL 01273 749 947 EDITORIAL [email protected] ADS+ARTWORK [email protected] EDITORIAL TEAM Jaq Bayles, Craig Hanlon-Smith, Graham Robson ARTS EDITOR Michael Hootman SUB EDITOR Graham Robson AMSTERDAM BAR & KITCHEN DESIGN Michèle Allardyce FRONT COVER MODEL Harry Clayton-Wright PHOTOGRAPHY Libertipix - Leading LGBTQ+ Images CAMELFORD ARMS Email: [email protected] D www.libertipix.com I instagram.com/libertipix P pinterest.co.uk/libertipix CONTRIBUTORS Simon Adams, Jaq Bayles, Jo Bourne, Nick Boston, Matt Boyles, Brian Butler, Richard Jeneway, Craig Hanlon-Smith, Samuel Hall, Frances Hubbard, Enzo Marra, Eric Page, Emma Rylands, Gay Socrates, Michael AFFINITY BAR Steinhage, Glen Stevens, Duncan LEGENDS Stewart, Netty Wendt, Roger Wheeler, NEWS Kate Wildblood, Stephen Wrench 4 News PHOTOGRAPHERS Creag Aaro, Steven Chantrey, Nick Ford, Craig Hanlon-Smith, Jack Lynn, SCENE Manel Ortega, Simon Pepper 26 Gscene Out & About ARTS 38 Classical Notes 40 All That Jazz 40 Arts Matters © GSCENE 2020 41 Page’s Pages All work appearing in Gscene Ltd is FEATURES copyright. It is to be assumed that the copyright for material rests with the REGULARS magazine unless otherwise stated on the 18 PUBERTY BLOCKERS EXPLAINED page concerned. No part of this publication 37 Dance Music may be reproduced, stored in an electronic or Dr Sam Hall, GP and trustee for The Clare Project, gets behind the headlines other retrieval system, transmitted in any 37 DJ Profile: form or by any means, electronic, 20 HARRY CLAYTON-WRIGHT mechanical, photocopying, recording or Morgan Fabulous otherwise without the prior knowledge and The quirks and weirdnesses of Harry Clayton-Wright by Craig Hanlon-Smith consent of the publishers.
    [Show full text]