DOCSLIB.ORG

Parks-Marinas-Bay-Tr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parks-Marinas-Bay-Tr Assessment Chapter Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project Parks and Recreation The San Francisco Bay area has more than one million acres of open space including regional, local and state parks. However, only 25,000 acres of this open space is along the shoreline1. These open spaces share the shoreline with seaports, residential development, airports, interstate highways, business parks and many other uses. The high density of development along the shoreline leaves little space for developing new major shoreline parks, so current and future demand for shoreline recreation will likely need to be met by existing parklands. However, as sea level rises and storm events begin to cause more extensive and longer duration flooding, park and recreation assets along the shoreline will become costlier to maintain, have services disrupted and compromised and some may disappear entirely. This will diminish the important regional role that shoreline parks and recreation serve in providing ecosystem and community services, and in defining, improving and maintaining the Bay Area’s quality of life. Shoreline parks in the Bay Area are often comprised of marsh habitat, wetlands, bluffs and other natural areas that bring communities in direct contact with the Bay and its natural resources. The Bay Area’s shoreline parks are most often used for walking, nature-viewing, and picnic areas but also provide shoreline-specific recreational opportunities such as kayaking launches, beach access, and fishing piers. In addition to recreation, these shoreline parks provide a variety of benefits, including critical wildlife habitat for aquatic, terrestrial, and avian species, reduced flood risks to inland communities, and improved public health. These valuable services may be lost as these natural shorelines face increased wave and tidal energy, and in some locations, longer duration periods of flooding or permanent flooding as sea level rises. Shoreline parks serve as de facto coastal flood protection for much of Alameda and Contra Costa counties; these areas were developed and are managed as park and recreation areas, not coastal flood protection for inland areas. In some parks this protection consists of structural shoreline components, such as levees and riprap shoreline; others provide natural shoreline protection through wetlands and coastal bluffs. Shoreline parks buffer Bay Area communities from flooding events in three ways. The first is by detaining stormwater in wetlands and permeable surfaces. The second is by reducing the height and strength of waves across wetlands, which reduces the need for expensive shoreline protection like levees and seawalls. The third is by serving as a setback from the Bay, separating denser and more sensitive development from storms and sea level rise. Sea level rise will increase the importance of the role of shoreline parks and natural areas as critical flood and stormwater management services. 1 Staff Report Recreation and San Francisco Bay July 7, 2006, http://www.bcdc.ca.gov/pdf/planning/bpa_02_06/bpa_02_06_rpt.pdf FEBRUARY 2016 1 Assessment Chapter Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project Another important benefit of park and recreation areas is the economic benefit provided to communities and regions that have functional open space systems. EBRPD analyzed the economic benefits of all its 111,000 parkland acres, including shoreline parks, and found that the park system in Contra Costa and Alameda counties provides $200 million in direct, regional economic benefits (EBRPD 2013). The Trust for Public Land has observed that strong park systems can increase property values by 5% in cities across the country, therefore contributing to the tax revenue2. The combined economic, environmental and community benefits of shoreline parks demonstrates that planning for sea level rise resilience must be a priority for the entire region, not just park supervisors and decision makers. Parks and recreation areas in the ART Contra Costa area provide a wide variety of services to the public. Resources and activities at these sites include scenic views; walking, running, and biking on paths and trails; nature viewing; interpretive displays; swimming; paddleboating; sailboarding; motorboating; picnicking; playgrounds; family/group event areas and facilities; dog recreation; historic or cultural activities; and sport facilities. Parks and recreational areas in the ART Contra Costa area serve users in four major categories: • Regional shoreline areas that attract visitors from the entire Bay Area and beyond • Small shoreline parks that serve a surrounding community or neighborhood • Marinas, often privately owned or managed, which provide boat access and other for-profit recreation experiences • San Francisco, a bicycle and pedestrian corridor with over 80 miles of trail in the Contra Costa Project. The Bay Trail is planned at the regional scale but individual trail segments are owned and maintained by cities, park districts, other agencies, and private landowners. This section focuses on the vulnerability and risk to 13 parks, 8 marinas, and the San Francisco Bay Trail in the project area from sea level rise impacts. 2 Because there is not a good metric for park quality, a low end estimate of 5% increase in property value is included for parks that convey a strong positive value to surrounding residents, https://www.tpl.org/sites/default/files/cloud.tpl.org/pubs/ccpe-econvalueparks-rpt.pdf FEBRUARY 2016 2 Assessment Chapter Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project Regional Parks East Bay Regional Park District owns and manages the seven regional shoreline parks in the Contra Costa project area. EBRPD is responsible for providing recreation and open space in a highly developed and growing area. EBRPD’s role has expanded over the years to include a greater range of management objectives on the parklands it owns and operates, including natural area restoration, community engagement, and new partnerships with neighboring landowners. KEY ISSUE STATEMENT EBRPD shoreline parks face flooding, groundwater infiltration, erosion, and habitat impacts from sea level rise and future flooding. These regional shoreline parks contain important marsh habitat, unique historical resources, and large-scale recreation assets including trails, fishing, wildlife viewing, and off-leash dog areas. The EBRPD shoreline parks serve 2.8 Million visitors each year. Sea level rise and future flooding will affect parks and shoreline habitat, as well as inland land uses in places where EBRPD provides the official or de facto shoreline protection. EBRPD will need to protect its park and recreation areas; it will also need to work with the inland neighbors that its shoreline parks protect from flooding, such as the Union Pacific Railroad, cities, and private landowners. EXPOSURE TO CURRENT AND FUTURE FLOODING All seven regional shoreline parks in the ART Contra Costa project area are exposed to some degree of current and future flood risk. This does not necessarily ensure damage or disruption by flooding; the regional parks contain marshes and seasonal wetlands that need temporary inundation to function. On the other hand, even short term flooding would damage certain aspects of shoreline parks, such as athletic fields, restrooms, and community facilities. Water levels between MHHW and MHHW+6’ were selected because they represent a reasonable range of potential Bay conditions that will affect flooding and inundation along the shoreline. For four parks in the project area, the extent exposed to each water level was determined (see table below). For many of the parks, the total park acreage includes submerged areas. To avoid a gross misrepresentation of the exposure percentages, the analysis was based on the dry land area of the park. This land area, or footprint, was visually determined and digitized in GIS using aerial imagery in combination with maps that show park boundaries. Therefore, the footprint values in the table below are approximations, as are the calculated exposure percentages. FEBRUARY 2016 3 Assessment Chapter Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project Current 100- Sea Level Rise Asset City year Flood 1' 2' 3' 4' 5' 6' Martinez Shoreline Martinez Yes 45% 56% 62% 66% 74% 78% Point Pinole Richmond Yes 13% 18% 19% 21% 22% 23% Miller Knox Shoreline Richmond Yes 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% Brooks Island/Point Richmond Yes 14% 22% 27% 30% 32% 33% Isabel ASSET DESCRIPTION Martinez Regional Shoreline Martinez Regional Shoreline is a 342-acre park with shoreline trails, marshes, fishing, picnic areas and separate recreation areas managed by the City of Martinez, including a marina and athletic fields. Park infrastructure is over 35 years old. Shorelines are rapidly eroding and erosion has forced the closure of over 300 feet of trail in past years. Outer turf areas are experiencing increasing salt-water intrusion, and planted trees are showing increasing signs of exposure to salt water. Interior marshes were designed and built to alleviate flooding in downtown Martinez through a joint agency project with the City of Martinez that was completed in 2004. Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline Miller-Knox Regional Shoreline is a 307-acre shoreline park that includes trails, a swimming area at Keller Beach, picnic facilities, the Golden State Model Railroad Museum, a fishing pier and a lagoon. The park is built at the site of a historic ferry terminal that no longer provides ferry service. Several historic structures are located on the property, although they are vacant and frequently vandalized. The park contains seven miles of Bay Trail with views of the Bay and historic sites. The park contains an unused railroad right-of-way that is now owned by EBRPD, but still contains railroad bed and tracks. Point Isabel Regional Shoreline Point Isabel Regional Shoreline covers 23 acres, and includes Bay Trail, grass areas, Hoffman Channel and Hoffman Marsh, and riprap shoreline segments. The park also contains a dog grooming business, cafe as a concessionaire, restrooms and a parking lot for visitors. Despite its small size, it is a very popular location for off-leash dog walking and serves 1.4 Million visitors each year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Distribution and Abundance
    DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE IN RELATION TO HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE FEATURES AND NEST SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF CALIFORNIA BLACK RAIL (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY ESTUARY FINAL REPORT To the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service March 2002 Hildie Spautz* and Nadav Nur, PhD Point Reyes Bird Observatory 4990 Shoreline Highway Stinson Beach, CA 94970 *corresponding author contact: [email protected] PRBO Black Rail Report to FWS 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We conducted surveys for California Black Rails (Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus) at 34 tidal salt marshes in San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, northern San Francisco Bay and western Marin County in 2000 and 2001 with the aims of: 1) providing the best current information on distribution and abundance of Black Rails, marsh by marsh, and total population size per bay region, 2) identifying vegetation, habitat, and landscape features that predict the presence of black rails, and 3) summarizing information on nesting and nest site characteristics. Abundance indices were higher at 8 marshes than in 1996 and earlier surveys, and lower in 4 others; with two showing no overall change. Of 13 marshes surveyed for the first time, Black Rails were detected at 7 sites. The absolute density calculated using the program DISTANCE averaged 2.63 (± 1.05 [S.E.]) birds/ha in San Pablo Bay and 3.44 birds/ha (± 0.73) in Suisun Bay. At each survey point we collected information on vegetation cover and structure, and calculated landscape metrics using ArcView GIS. We analyzed Black Rail presence or absence by first analyzing differences among marshes, and then by analyzing factors that influence detection of rails at each survey station.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet
    June 1, 2021 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Board Meeting Packet SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 1, 2021 at 1:00 pm Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at https://youtu.be/md2gdzkkvVg Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Monday, May 31, 2021 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: *Note: this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the https://zoom.us/j/94773173402 virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Waterfront Commission
    PARKS AND WATERFRONT COMMISSION Regular Meeting Wednesday, October 10, 2018, 7:00 P.M. Frances Albrier Community Center 2800 Park Street, Berkeley, CA Parks and Waterfront Commission Agenda The Commissions may discuss any items listed on the agenda, but may take action only on items identified as Action. Preliminary Matters 1. Call to Order (Chair). 2. Roll Call (Secretary). 3. Announcements (Chair). 4. Approval of Agenda (Chair). 5. Approval Minutes for September 12, 2018 * (Chair). 6. Public Comment 7. Director’s Report (Ferris): Parks CIP Project List; Special Events; Waterfront Leases; 7:30 Berkeley Marina Area Specific Plan (BMASP); Parks Division; Waterfront Division. Discussion 8. Discussion Item: East Bay Regional Park District – presentation on the upcoming 7:45 November 6, 2018 general election Measure FF to extend the existing Measure CC $12 per year parcel tax to fund parks projects within the Measure CC zone which includes Berkeley * (EBRPD staff). 9. Discussion item: Update on the Parking Study at the Marina – next steps * (Ferris). 8:00 Action 10. Action Item: Update on marina fiscal issues, and send a communication to Council 8:15 in support of a one-time funding request for the Berkeley Waterfront * (Ferris/Lee). 11. Action Item: Update from Urban Pollinator Habitat subcommittee and authorize the 8:45 chair to share update at next Community Environmental Advisory Commission (CEAC) meeting (Diehm). Discussion 12. Discussion Item: Update on Traffic Circle Vegetation Policy * (Diehm). 9:00 13. Discussion Item: Presentation on existing City Tree Planting Program and existing 9:10 Parks Donation Policy (Ferris). 14. Future Agenda Items: Commemorative Tree Donation Policy; Marina Parking Study and 9:30 Community feedback, public meetings on Oct 9 and Oct 23, 2018; Traffic Circle Vegetation Maintenance Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County Fish and Wildlife Committee (FWC) Date: February 17, 2016 Time: 3:00 P.M
    Contra Costa County Fish and Wildlife Committee (FWC) Date: February 17, 2016 Time: 3:00 p.m. Location: County Public Works Department Road Maintenance Division lunch room (squad room) 2475 Waterbird Way, Martinez CA 94553 (Map is attached.) AGENDA 3:00 p.m. Convene meeting. 1) Introductions. 2) Review/Approve minutes from the January 20, 2016 meeting. 3) Public comment. Includes public comment on topics on the agenda and items not listed on the agenda. The FWC shall also accept public comment on agenda items at the time they are discussed. 4) Updates and announcements from staff and FWC members. Includes discussion on implementation of actions authorized previously, on correspondence received, and on upcoming meetings of interest to the FWC. 5) Review and accept the final report from East Bay Regional Parks Foundation on their “Contra Costa County Youth Environmental Education Camperships” project. 6) Review and accept the final report from SPAWNERS on their “Teaching Volunteers to Monitor the Aquatic Invertebrates Present in San Pablo Creeks an Indicator of Stream Health” project. 7) Continue to consider the 16 Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund applications submitted by January 6, 2016. Consider making a recommendation to the Internal Operations Committee of the Board of Supervisors on this matter. 8) Determine the agenda for the next meeting. The next regular meeting date is March 16, 2016. Possible agenda items for upcoming meetings include: • Presentation on problem weeds • Election of Officers - April Adjourn The Committee Chair may alter the order of agenda items at the meeting. Please contact Maureen Parkes at 925-674-7831 / [email protected] (or Abigail Fateman at 925-674-7820 / [email protected]) at the CCC Department of Conservation and Development if you have questions about the Fish & Wildlife Committee or desire materials related to this agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Park District 2005 Budget
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 2005 BUDGET January 1 to December 31, 2005 2005 Adopted Budget Page 1 East Bay Regional Park District Page Intentionally Left Blank 2005 Adopted Budget Page 2 East Bay Regional Park District TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS .......................................................................... 7 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MAP .............................................................. 9 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK............................................................................................ 11 SECTION A – GENERAL MANAGER’S MESSAGE..................................................... 13 SECTION B – BUDGET OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 21 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE .................................................................................... 29 TOTAL RESOURCES BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ..................... 30 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ............ 34 BUDGET BY FUND ............................................................................................ 37 BUDGET BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT .................................................... 38 AUTHORIZATION POSITIONS BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT ................. 40 GENERAL FUND ................................................................................................ 41 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ............................................................................. 47 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Active Wetland Habitat Projects of the San
    ACTIVE WETLAND HABITAT PROJECTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY JOINT VENTURE The SFBJV tracks and facilitates habitat protection, restoration, and enhancement projects throughout the nine Bay Area Projects listed Alphabetically by County counties. This map shows where a variety of active wetland habitat projects with identified funding needs are currently ALAMEDA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND. NEED MARIN COUNTY (continued) MAP ACRES FUND. NEED underway. For a more comprehensive list of all the projects we track, visit: www.sfbayjv.org/projects.php Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration 1 NA $12,000,000 McInnis Marsh Habitat Restoration 33 180 $17,500,000 Alameda Point Restoration 2 660 TBD Novato Deer Island Tidal Wetlands Restoration 34 194 $7,000,000 Coyote Hills Regional Park - Restoration and Public Prey enhancement for sea ducks - a novel approach 3 306 $12,000,000 35 3.8 $300,000 Access Project to subtidal habitat restoration Hayward Shoreline Habitat Restoration 4 324 $5,000,000 Redwood Creek Restoration at Muir Beach, Phase 5 36 46 $8,200,000 Hoffman Marsh Restoration Project - McLaughlin 5 40 $2,500,000 Spinnaker Marsh Restoration 37 17 $3,000,000 Eastshore State Park Intertidal Habitat Improvement Project - McLaughlin 6 4 $1,000,000 Tennessee Valley Wetlands Restoration 38 5 $600,000 Eastshore State Park Martin Luther King Jr. Regional Shoreline - Water 7 200 $3,000,000 Tiscornia Marsh Restoration 39 16 $1,500,000 Quality Project Oakland Gateway Shoreline - Restoration and 8 200 $12,000,000 Tomales Dunes Wetlands 40 2 $0 Public Access Project Off-shore Bird Habitat Project - McLaughlin 9 1 $1,500,000 NAPA COUNTY MAP ACRES FUND.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL
    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave. Macdonald Ave. and 11th St. - 1940’s Source: Online Archive of California City of Richmond, California Issued by the City of Richmond, CA City Manager’s Office, Development Services Submission Deadline: May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM (PDT) City of Richmond, CA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity 920 Macdonald Ave. City of Richmond, California City Council Mayor Tom Butt Vice Mayor Melvin Willis Councilmember Nathaniel Bates Councilmember Ben Choi Councilmember Eduardo Martinez Councilmember Jael Myrick Councilmember Demnlus Johnson III City Manager Carlos Martinez City Manager Bill Lindsay Stay updated on all Richmond Opportunity Sites: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/OpportunitySites Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: 920 Macdonald Ave. 2 City of Richmond, CA Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 4 II. NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY ASSETS............................. 6 III. SITE VISION...................................................................................... 21 IV. SITE AND PARCEL SUMMARY...................................................... 23 V. DEVELOPMENT TEAM SELECTION............................................ 29 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 30 VII. SELECTION CRITERIA, PROCESS & SCHEDULE.................. 33 VIII. CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS....................
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • Pt. Isabel-Stege Area
    Tales of the Bay Shore -- Pt. Isabel-Stege area Geology: The “bones” of the shoreline from Albany to Richmond are a sliver of ancient, alien sea floor, caught on the edge of North America as it overrode the Pacific. Fleming Point (site of today’s racetrack), Albany Hill, Pt. Isabel, Brooks Island, scattered hillocks inland, the hills at Pt Richmond, and the hills across the San Pablo Strait (spanned by the Richmond Bridge) all are part of this Novato Terrane. Erosion and uplift eventually left their hard rock as hilltops in a valley. Still later – only about 5000 years ago -- rising seas from the melting glaciers of our last Ice Age flooded the valley, forming today’s San Francisco Bay. The “alien” hilltops became islands, peninsulas linked to shore by marsh, or isolated dome-like “turtlebacks.” Left: Portion of 1911 map of SF Bay showing many Native American sites near Pt. Isabel and Stege. Right: 1853 U.S. Coastal Survey map showing N. end of Albany Hill, Cerrito Creek, Pt. Isabel, and marshes/ to North. Native Americans: Native Americans would have watched the slow rise of today’s Bay. When Europeans reached North America, the East Bay was the home of Huchiun Ohlone peoples. Living in groups generally of fewer than 100 people, they moved seasonally amid rich and varied resources, gathering, hunting, fishing, and encouraging useful plants with pruning and burning. They made reed boats, baskets, nets, traps, mortars, and a wide variety of implements and decorations. Along the shellfish-rich shoreline they gradually built up substantial hills of debris – shell mounds -- that kept them above floods and served as multipurpose homesites, burial sites, refuse dumps, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX
    City of Richmond Climate Change Adaptation Study APPENDIX City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Acknowledgements The City of Richmond has been an active participant in the Contra Costa County Adapting to Rising Tides Project, led by the Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC) in partnership with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the State Coastal Conservancy, the San Francisco Estuary Partnership, the San Francisco Estuary Institute, Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, and consulting firm AECOM. Environmental Science Associates (ESA) completed this Adaptation Study in coordination with BCDC, relying in part on reports and maps developed for the Adapting to Rising Tides project to assess the City of Richmond’s vulnerabilities with respect to sea level rise and coastal flooding. City of Richmond Climate Action Plan F-i Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study This page intentionally left blank F-ii City of Richmond Climate Action Plan Appendix F: Climate Change Adaptation Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements i 1. Executive Summary 1 1.1 Coastal Flooding 2 1.2 Water Supply 2 1.3 Critical Transportation Assets 3 1.4 Vulnerable Populations 3 1.5 Summary 3 2. Study Methodology 4 2.1 Scope and Organize 4 2.2 Assess 4 2.3 Define 4 2.4 Plan 5 2.5 Implement and Monitor 5 3. Setting 6 3.1 Statewide Climate Change Projections 6 3.2 Bay Area Region Climate Change Projections 7 3.3 Community Assets 8 3.4 Relevant Local Planning Initiatives 9 3.5 Relevant State and Regional Planning Initiatives 10 4.
    [Show full text]