BSRA 2015-03-07 Entertainment Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
10 – Eurocruise - Porto Part 4 - Heritage Streetcar Operations
10 – Eurocruise - Porto Part 4 - Heritage Streetcar Operations On Wednesday morning Luis joined us at breakfast in our hotel, and we walked a couple of blocks in a light fog to a stop on the 22 line. The STCP heritage system consists of three routes, numbered 1, 18 and 22. The first two are similar to corresponding services from the days when standard- gauge streetcars were the most important element in Porto’s transit system. See http://www.urbanrail.net/eu/pt/porto/porto-tram.htm. The three connecting heritage lines run every half-hour, 7 days per week, starting a little after the morning rush hour. Routes 1 and 18 are single track with passing sidings, while the 22 is a one-way loop, with a short single-track stub at its outer end. At its Carmo end the 18 also traverses a one-way loop through various streets. Like Lisbon, the tramway operated a combination of single- and double- truck Brill-type cars in its heyday, but now regular service consists of only the deck-roofed 4-wheelers, which have been equipped with magnetic track brakes. Four such units are operated each day, as the 1 line is sufficiently long to need two cars. The cars on the road on Wednesday were 131, 205, 213 and 220. All were built by the CCFP (Porto’s Carris) from Brill blueprints. The 131 was completed in 1910, while the others came out of the shops in the late 1930s-early 1940s. Porto also has an excellent tram museum, which is adjacent to the Massarelos carhouse, where the rolling stock for the heritage operation is maintained. -
January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails To
January–June 2005 · $10.00 / Rails to Rubber to Rails Again, Part 1: Alabama–Montana Headlights The Magazine of Electric Railways Published since 1939 by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. WWW.ERAUSA.ORG Staff Contents Editor and Art Director January–June 2005 Sandy Campbell Associate Editors Raymond R. Berger, Frank S. Miklos, John Pappas Contributors Edward Ridolph, Trevor Logan, Bill Volkmer, Columns Alan K. Weeks 2 News Electric Railroaders’ Compiled by Frank Miklos. International transportation reports. Association, Inc. E Two-Part Cover Story Board of Directors 2008 President 18 Rails to Rubber to Rails Again Frank S. Miklos By Edward Ridolph. An extensive 60-year summary of the street railway industry in First Vice President the U.S. and Canada, starting with its precipitous 30-year, post-World War II decline. William K. Guild It continues with the industry’s rebirth under the banner of “light rail” in the early Second Vice President & Corresponding Secretary 1980s, a renaissance which continues to this day. Raymond R. Berger Third Vice President & Recording Secretary Robert J. Newhouser Below: LAMTA P3 3156 is eastbound across the First Street bridge over the Los Treasurer Angeles River in the waning weeks of service before abandonment of Los Angeles’ Michael Glikin narrow gauge system on March 31, 1963. GERALD SQUIER PHOTO Director Jeffrey Erlitz Membership Secretary Sandy Campbell Officers 2008 Trip & Convention Chairman Jack May Librarian William K. Guild Manager of Publication Sales Raymond R. Berger Overseas Liason Officer James Mattina National Headquarters Grand Central Terminal, New York City A-Tower, Room 4A Mailing Address P.O. -
Portuguese Trams Imported by Gales Creek Enterprises
Volume 25 Issue 1 Spring 2020 Reminder to members: Please be sure your dues are In This Issue up to date. 2020 dues were due Jan 1, 2020. If it has Portuguese Trams – Richard Thompson ……………..…..…………….…1 been longer than one year since you renewed, go to Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society News…………………………2 Willamette Shore Trolley Update – Dave Rowe …………………..……..12 our website: oregontrolley.com and download an Donation Request ……………..…………………………………..…..……14 application by clicking: Become a Member. Portuguese Trams It has been 25 years since the OERHS departed Glenwood, yet the following story should be of interest to Imported by Gales Creek newer members because a Portuguese streetcar joined the collection at Powerland in 2006. Porto No. 210 (renumbered Enterprises (1974-1993) 201 before arrival) is not a part of the Trolley Park story, of course, but it is similar to the streetcars that were kept there. Richard Thompson Car 210 was one of a series built during 1938-45 to replace the Brill and St. Louis Car Company classics. A sense of familiarity might also come from the fact that vintage Beginning in 1974, Gales Creek Enterprises (GCE), Portuguese trams share a kinship with our beloved Council headed by Oregon Electric Railway Historical Society Crest cars 503 and 506. (OERHS) co-founder Paul Class, provided at least 70 vintage streetcars to launch trolley operations in a half-dozen American cities. In the process Paul almost single-handedly started what we now call the “heritage streetcar” movement. His company imported many streetcars from Australia and Brazil, but the largest part of that pioneering effort involved trams from Portugal. -
Edmonton's Hanover 601 Streetcar Returned to Germany
Edmonton’s Hanover 601 Streetcar returned to Germany After more than a decade in Edmonton, “Hanover 601”, the red and white streetcar that plied the rails atop the world’s highest streetcar bridge, has been returned to its native Germany to celebrate the 125th anniversary of public transit in Hanover. It will become part of a museum collection in that city. The streetcar was sold for $1.00 and departed Edmonton on September 16th. The six-axle high performance car dates from 1970 and was one of two, 600 built by Linke-Hoffman-Busch with Kiepe electrics, and 601 built by Düwag with Siemens equipment, as prototypes to replace the Hanover streetcar fleet. After testing, the operator ÜSTRA decided on eight-axle cars, and so the pair were returned to their respective builders. Boston and San Francisco wanted to bring 601 over as a prototype for a joint fleet renewal program, but this was nixed by Nixon who insisted on home grown vehicles, resulting in the disastrous SLRV design by Boeing Vertol with bodies from Japan. Düwag modified the 601 design to develop the U2 LRT car for Frankfurt, and it was subsequently modified for Edmonton, Calgary and San Diego. When Edmonton’s LRT line was being designed, ETS’ Robert Clark, having established a connection with the Düwag management, suggested a tour of North American cities with 601, but Düwag’s General Manager replied to the effect that Düwag built the best streetcars in the world and needed no such demonstration. About that time, Siemens decided to diversify its medical operation in Canada and brought along Düwag, going from a sub-contractor to prime, with the Edmonton order being key. -
Bring Back the Streetcars : a Conservative Vision of Tomorrow's
Bring Back the Streetcars! A Conservative Vision of Tomorrow's Urban Transportation by Paul M. Weyrich and William S. Lind .... Free~• Foundation This study of public transportation by the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation was underwritten by the private sector Business Members of the American Public Transportation Association. The views expressed are those of the authors. Public Transportation Partnership for Tomorrow Washington, DC June 2002 BRING BACK THE STREETCARS! A Conservative Vision of Tomorrow’s Urban Transportation A Study Prepared by the Free Congress Research and Education Foundation By Paul M. Weyrich and William S. Lind The Free Congress Foundation 717 Second Street Washington, DC 20002 (202) 546-3000 June 2002 Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction: What’s Right with This Picture? 3 Bring Back the Streetcars! 6 The Context: Restoring Our Cities and Building New Towns 6 What Is a Streetcar? 9 Vintage and Heritage Streetcars 12 Who Else Is Doing It? 13 What Does It Cost? 18 Three Case Studies: 21 Dallas, Texas 21 Memphis, Tennessee 24 Portland, Oregon 28 Conclusion 32 Appendices: 34 Appendix I: Getting Started 34 Appendix II: The Gomaco Trolley Company 37 Appendix III: Resources 39 Notes 40 E xecutive Summary For more than half a century, the context in which public transport operated was suburbanization. But recently, that has begun to change. Urban downtowns are reviving, and new towns are being built to traditional patterns. Not only can streetcars serve these non- suburban areas, they need streetcars in order to flourish. Streetcars – which we define as rail transit vehicles designed for local transportation, powered by electricity received from an overhead wire – differ from both buses and Light Rail. -
BSRA 2015-08-01 Entertainment Report
BSRA Entertainment Report for August 1, 2015 LONG FORM (for historical record) Entertainment Report for August 1, 2015 August 1, 2015. San Francisco's F Line. Peter Ehrlich has been an operator on San Francisco's F Line until 2005, and has operated heritage and modern streetcars, and even buses. Tonight, he presented San Francisco's famous F Line, America's most successful heritage streetcar line, with the digital slideshow being accompanied by handouts of the F Line's streetcar roster and route map. The Market Street Railway is a private booster organization that supports the F Line, but does not run it; it has offices in the Flood Building (which we got to see later in the show). It is not cirectly related to the Market Street Railway Company of 1857 - 1944, although it is named after this transit company. San Francisco's Municipal Railway (MUNI) runs the F Line, and is also responsible for maintining the streetcars, and charges the same fare for riding on them (the only MUNI vehicles that charge a different fare are the cable cars). As Peter's first images showed us, the F Line began official operation on September 1, 1995, with a 20 streetcar parade led by the Blackpool "boat tram" (built in 1934) that the F Line had at the time; however, much work had already been done to establish it by this time, for it was an outgrowth of the San Francisco Historic Trolley Festivals that started in 1983 to serve as a replacement tourist attraction while the cablecar system was shut down for major overhaul from 1982 - 1984. -
Transit Mode Primer
TRANSIT MODE PRIMER The Regional Tampa Bay Next is a program to modernize We’re committed to providing both financial and Tampa Bay’s transportation infrastructure and prepare technical support to our local partners in their pursuit for the future. FDOT is committed to a comprehensive of better transit services. To make a robust and reliable approach to transportation planning and development transit system a reality, the Tampa Bay community for an integrated, multimodal regional transportation must work together to reach a consensus on transit system. The program includes: improvement projects and develop a viable funding plan • Interstate Modernization to construct, operate and maintain the system. To get • Transit better transit services in our community, we must answer • Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities one important question: Are we willing to pay for it? • Complete Streets • Transportation Innovation Transit Mode Characteristics • Freight Mobility Type of service provided: average distance of trip Tampa Bay’s complex transportation problems require Type of station: elevated, platform, shelter, on- comprehensive, multimodal solutions. With Tampa street, or park-and-ride Bay Next, FDOT’s interstate planning is fully integrated with transit planning. Spacing between stations: average distance between stations How can Tampa Bay make transit a Operating speeds: average operating speeds (miles reality? per hour); affected by the number of stations, weight of the vehicle, incline, and number and degree of turns Transit is a locally supported service and any major transit improvements would require investment from Capacity: optimal capacity measured in passengers the local community. When you look at successful per hour; assumes bus or train arrives at a station every transit models across the United States, you see local 10 minutes, except aerial cable transit (3 minutes) and communities prioritizing funding for transit systems. -
Ribbon of Steel a Multi-Use Trail and Streetcar Corridor Downtown Edmonton, Alberta
RIBBON OF STEEL A MULTI-USE TRAIL AND STREETCAR CORRIDOR DOWNTOWN EDMONTON, ALBERTA Claire Stock, P.Eng. The City of Edmonton Transportation & Streets Department Paper prepared for presentation at the Geometric Design and Vulnerable Road Users Session of the 2004 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Québec City, Québec July 2004 Ribbon of Steel – A Multi-use Trail and Streetcar Corridor Edmonton, Alberta ABSTRACT i 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. RIBBON OF STEEL OVERVIEW 1 FIGURE 1.1 PROJECT AREA 1 FIGURE 1.2 RIBBON OF STEEL CONCEPT PLAN 2 1.2. FACILITIES FOR SELF-PROPELLED MODES IN EDMONTON 3 1.3. POLICIES SUPPORTING ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION 3 FIGURE 1.3 MULTI-USE TRAIL CORRIDOR NETWORK 4 1.4. RELATIONSHIP TO MUNICIPAL STRATEGIES 5 1.5. PROJECT TIMELINE & KEY ACTIVITIES 5 2. SITE CONDITIONS 6 2.1. CORRIDOR OUTLINE 6 2.2. SURROUNDING TRANSPORTATION NETWORK 6 2.3. ADJACENT LAND USES 7 3. DETAILED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION 8 3.1. 97 AVENUE SOUTHERN ACCESS 8 FIGURE 3.1 97 AVENUE – BEFORE & AFTER 8 3.2. 98 AVENUE/GRANDIN LRT & STREETCAR STOP 9 FIGURE 3.2 98 AVENUE STREETCAR PLAZA – BEFORE & AFTER 9 3.3. 99 AVENUE OVERPASS 10 FIGURE 3.3 99 AVENUE OVERPASS – BEFORE & AFTER 10 3.4. 100 AVENUE CROSSING 11 FIGURE 3.4 100 AVENUE CROSSING – BEFORE & AFTER 11 3.5. JASPER AVENUE STREETCAR TERMINUS 12 FIGURE 3.5 100 AVENUE TO JASPER AVENUE – BEFORE & AFTER 12 4. IMPORTANT DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 13 4.1. DELINEATION 13 4.2. LINEAR CONTINUITY 13 4.3. ROADWAY INTEGRATION 14 Ribbon of Steel – A Multi-use Trail and Streetcar Corridor Edmonton, Alberta 5. -
Alberta Aviation Museu
Attachment 1 2021 Operational and Project Grants Attachment 1 Operational Grants: Applicant: Alberta Aviation Museum Association Recommended Grant: $ 168,710 Organizational Overview: Alberta Aviation Museum’s mission is to be an active community partner and steward of aviation history, providing a dynamic visitor experience and sharing stories about the role of aviation in building our community. Applicant: Alberta Genealogical Society Recommended Grant: $26,964 Organizational Overview: Founded in 1973, the Alberta Genealogical Society is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of genealogy and genealogical research within the province of Alberta. Their mission is to provide support and services for people researching their family history and genealogy. Applicant: Alberta Labour History Institute Recommended Grant: $9,399 Organizational Overview: The founding mission of the Alberta Labour History Institute (ALHI) is to contribute to an historical awareness of workers’ past, the institutions that they have developed to protect their interests, and the influence they have had in promoting legislation and community developments for all Edmontonians. Applicant: Alberta Pioneer Railway Association Recommended Grant: $19,790 Organizational Overview: The Alberta Railway Museum is a volunteer run, not- for-profit heritage organization that prides itself in telling the history of Alberta’s railways through a hands-on and interpretive experience for families. In operation since 1968, the Alberta Pioneer Railway Association (APRA) oversees and runs the museum. Applicant: Edmonton Chinatown Library Foundation Recommended Grant: $23,720 Organizational Overview: The Edmonton Chinatown Chinese Library (ECCL) is a non-profit organization with a mandate to serve the Page 1 of 4 Report: EXT00217 Heritage Community Investment Program – Grant Summaries Chinese community and the general public and leave a rich historical and cultural legacy for anyone interested in Chinese culture. -
US Manufacture of Rail Vehicles for Intercity
! "#$#!%&'()&*+(,-!.)!/&01! 2-30*1-4!).,!5'+-,*0+6! 7&44-'8-,!/&01!&'9! ",:&'!;,&'40+! ! ! !"#$%&'"()$*+"!+$%,-*-" ! ! %&,*6!B.C-?!$&.,0!;.D(.D&?!E,04+-'!F(:&6?! <('-!=>?!=@A@! &'9!G&,6!G-,-))0! ! H.'+,0:(+0'8!HGGH!,-4-&,*3-,I!;&10!;,088! ! ! ! ! ./0/"1$+&2$34&5'"62"7$*%"#')*3%'-"265"8+4'53*4,"9$--'+:'5"7$*%"$+;".5<$+"=5$+-*4" This research was prepared on behalf of Apollo Alliance with support from the Rockefeller Foundation and Surdna Foundation. The authors would like to thank Matt Mayrl of the Apollo Alliance for comments on early drafts. Many thanks also to the following reviewers: Doug Bowen, Chandra Brown, Nora Friend, Ruggero Golini, Dennis Harwig, Hatsuhiko Kageyama, Mike Mekhiche, Richard Moss, Matthew Palilla, Mike Pracht, Maryanne Roberts, Robin Stimson, and Chuck Wochele. Errors of fact or interpretation remain exclusively with the authors. We welcome comments and suggestions. The lead author can be contacted at [email protected]. List of Abbreviations APMs Automated People Movers ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act CNR China North Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group CSR China South Locomotive and Rolling Stock Industry Group DMUs Diesel Multiple Units EMUs Electric Multiple Units EMD Electro Motive Diesel EWI Edison Welding Institute FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HSR High Speed Rail IAMAW International Association of Machinists IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers LRT Light Rail Transit NAICS North American Industry Classification System OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer PRIIA Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 UNIFE Union des Industries Ferroviaires Européennes U.S. PIRG Federation of State Public Interest Research Groups Photo Permissions: Cover photo by Dave Wilcox (2008), Tostie14, (2005) and Doug Beghtel (2009) © June 22, 2010. -
(Second Draft) Heritage Trolley / Streetcar Infrastructure Standards J
Introduction/Statement of Purpose (Second Draft) Heritage Trolley / Streetcar Infrastructure Standards J. Schantz - September 2007 Foreword This standard for Vintage / Heritage Trolley and Modern Streetcar track and overhead infrastructure is the second major component of a set of recommended practice documents covering Vintage / Heritage Trolley technology, and is the first extended to include modern streetcars. As this standard was being prepared, there were about two dozen heritage trolley or modern streetcar operations around the United States, with many more in the planning stages. All of them use electric propulsion and operate on rail typically in a mixture of street and private right of way configurations.The vehicles, be they heritage or modern, are usually lighter and lower speed than light rail vehicles so are suited to a simpler infrastructure than their larger counterparts. The rail transit industry and various engineering or self-regulatory groups have been steadily generating standards covering many technical aspects of rail infrastructure and the related electrification. However, some aspects of these standards are not ideal for the operating environment of heritage or modern streetcars. For this reason the APTA Heritage Trolley and Streetcar Subcommittee has created this standards document to outline concepts appropriate for streetcar lines built in an urban public transit environment. It is the intention of this standard to focus on design level practices, leaving many engineering aspects of preferred designs to the detailed standards prepared by groups such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE )and American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association (AREMA). This subcommittee and other APTA entities are working closely with these groups on development of detailed infrastructure standards. -
Midsize Cities on the Move
(Inside front cover) December 2012 Midsize Cities on the Move A Look at the Next Generation of Rapid Bus, Bus Rapid Transit, and Streetcar Projects in the United States Acknowledgements We would like to thank The Rockefeller Foundation for supporting this research. We also wish to thank the review panel members for their helpful comments and suggestions: Sarah Jo Peterson, Urban Land Institute; Dennis Hinebaugh, National Bus Rapid Transit Institute; Kathy Nothstine and Brett Schwartz, National Association of Development Organizations; Jeff Hiott, American Public Transportation Association; Roger Millar, Smart Growth America; David Westendorff , Mid-Sized Cities Policy Research Institute, University of Memphis; and Leslie Wollack, National League of Cities. We are thankful for the refl ections and participation of staff from transit agencies, cities, and metropolitan planning organizations that contributed to this report. This report was written by Sarah Kline and Sasha Forbes, and edited and formatted by John Hughes, with contributions from Elizabeth Wampler, Jeff Wood and Irving Pham. Midsize Cities on the Move 3 Contents Acknowledgements2 Introduction6 Methodology7 What is a Midsize City?9 Three Types of Midsize Cities9 Midsize City Characteristics10 Supporting Economic Revitalization: Stark Area Regional Transit Authority, Canton, OH12 A Look at Midsize Regions13 Transit Investments14 Overview of Rapid Bus and Bus Rapid Transit14 Overview of Streetcars17 Planning and Implementation of Transit Projects20 Players and Partnerships 20 Transit