DOCSLIB.ORG

2021- 2022 Service Revisions Preliminary Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021- 2022 Service Revisions Preliminary Proposal 2021- 2022 Service Revisions Preliminary Proposal Prepared for: Performance Monitoring and External Relations Committee Draft 1/30/2020 Spokane Transit assures nondiscrimination in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For more information, see www.spokanetransit.com. Upon request, alternative formats of this information will be produced for people who are disabled. Please call (509) 325-6094 (TTY WA Relay 711) or email [email protected]. 2021- 2022 Service Revisions 1 Spokane Transit Authority Draft 1/30/2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 September 2020 Service Revisions ......................................................................................... 3 May 2021 Service Revisions .................................................................................................... 3 May 2022 Service Revisions .................................................................................................... 4 Development of the Preliminary Proposal ..................................................................................... 5 Proposed Revisions ......................................................................................................................... 7 Increased Service to Airway Heights ....................................................................................... 7 Fairchild Air Force Base, Airway Heights, & Spokane International Airport Proposed Route Concepts ................................................................................................................................. 8 Concept A: Fairchild Air Force Base, Airway Heights, & Spokane International Airport ........ 9 Concept B: Fairchild Air Force Base, Airway Heights, & Spokane International Airport ...... 12 Greater Spokane Valley Network Adjustments .................................................................... 16 Expand Hillyard and Northeast Spokane Routes .................................................................. 27 Concept A: Northeast Spokane ............................................................................................. 28 Concept B: Northeast Spokane ............................................................................................. 39 Frequency Assumptions ........................................................................................................ 49 Budget Considerations .......................................................................................................... 51 Next Steps ..................................................................................................................................... 52 Title VI Implications................................................................................................................... 52 Paratransit Boundary Implications ........................................................................................... 52 Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 57 Rider Roundtable Discussion Notes .......................................................................................... 57 All Employee Meeting Exercise Notes ...................................................................................... 64 Online Workshop Summary Report .......................................................................................... 68 2021- 2022 Service Revisions 2 Spokane Transit Authority Draft 1/30/2020 Executive Summary In 2020, Spokane Transit will embark on the construction of its first bus rapid transit line, the Central City Line (now rebranded as the City Line), as part of the vision for high performance transit and in keeping with the STA Moving Forward plan. With its high capacity battery-electric buses, substantial stations, frequent service and streamlined operations, the City Line will function as part of an enhanced network to connect workers to jobs, people to services and partner in regional economic development. To create this functionality, STA has long planned to revise existing routes that connect to the City Line corridor, as well as introduce other service improvements. Additionally, STA intends to make other route revisions to improve system performance as part of the continuous effort to deliver service to more customers within limited resources. This report is the first in a series of iterations that depicts how STA’s routes and schedules could be altered between now and the opening of the City Line in May 2022. Unless otherwise noted, the implementation of these improvements is subject to a phased consultation process, beginning with this Preliminary Proposal and leading ultimately to a series of service revisions approved by the STA Board of Directors. Planned or proposed changes would take place primarily during three service changes: September 2020 Service Revisions Cheney Corridor High Performance Transit Service Service enhancements on the Cheney HPT Corridor will begin in 2020. Facilities and vehicle improvements will be completed in 2021-2022. The implementation of the service and capital improvements for Cheney HPT will be finalized with the Board Planning and Development Committee through a separate process in early 2020, addressing modifications from earlier plans. For purposes of the Preliminary Proposal, it is assumed these changes will go into effect in 2020 and therefore reflected in maps within this document. May 2021 Service Revisions Greater Spokane Valley Network Adjustments Route changes are proposed in Spokane Valley, Millwood, Liberty Lake and unincorporated Spokane County in order to serve new requested destinations. The proposed changes preserve service to destinations identified in STA Moving Forward while addressing under- performing segments of the existing Route 95 Mid Valley. 2021- 2022 Service Revisions 3 Spokane Transit Authority Draft 1/30/2020 May 2022 Service Revisions City Line The City Line is a six-mile, corridor-based Bus Rapid Transit route connecting Browne’s Addition to Spokane Community College by way of Downtown Spokane and the University District. The concept and design for the City Line (previously known as the Central City Line) has been developed in collaboration with numerous stakeholders over the last several years. While the City Line will be a major part of these service changes, it is not a major focus of this report as the significant decisions regarding the routing and service levels have already been made. Increased Service to Airway Heights Two different concepts are proposed to increase service to Airway Heights consistent with STA Moving Forward. The concepts also acknowledge the role the City Line takes on as it becomes the primary service Browne’s Addition, allowing Routes 60 and 61, which currently travel through this neighborhood, to be relocated to Sunset Boulevard thereby providing direct access to Downtown Spokane. Expand Hillyard and Northeast Spokane Routes Two different concepts are proposed to increase service, improve connections to other parts of the region, serve new destinations in northeast Spokane, and enhance connectivity to other areas. These changes include discontinuing and/or modifying existing routes that duplicate the City Line routing. 2021- 2022 Service Revisions 4 Spokane Transit Authority Draft 1/30/2020 Development of the Preliminary Proposal The STA Moving Forward plan, as amended, and the board-adopted 2019 Transit Development Plan (TDP) identify several significant service changes and improvements that would go into effect in 2021 and 2022. Fixed-route service design requires a robust examination of opportunities, feedback and consideration of policies and design principles. This Preliminary Proposal has been developed in accordance with the principles and policies of Connect Spokane, STA’s comprehensive plan for public transportation, while meeting the commitments set forth in the STA Moving Forward plan. While these are rigorous requirements and policies, they still provide ample room for public input, discussion, and technical considerations. Indeed, transit planning has both elements of art and science with a heavy dosage of constraints introduced by the built environment. Given this, virtually every improvement in the STA Moving Forward plan will have an appropriately scaled public input process that precedes the implementation of the service or when specific design considerations are under evaluation. Voters’ approval of the funding for STA Moving Forward represents more of a beginning to public input rather than the final decision. The Communication and Public Input element of Connect Spokane: A Comprehensive Plan for Public Transportation states: As a public agency, Spokane Transit Authority believes that proper communications and public input is of the highest importance. To ensure transparency, accountability, and fairness, STA must use a broad range of communication tools to reach as many people as possible. Communication and Public Input Policy 1.1 Major Service Changes mandates that when major service changes are proposed (either a large service reduction, or a restructure of the network), STA will follow federal guidelines for public outreach as well as develop a Public Outreach plan that must receive approval by the STA Board. A public outreach plan for these service changes was adopted by the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • __History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
    HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1: Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle
    Howard Research and Development Corporation Downtown Columbia Downtown Transit Center and Circulator Shuttle Feasibility Study: Part 1 - Downtown Transit Center & Downtown Circulator Shuttle (Part of CEPPA #5) DRAFTDecember 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. iv Chapter 1. Downtown Columbia Transit Center ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Downtown Columbia Circulator Shuttle ............................................................................................... 12 Appendix A. Regional Transit System Evaluation .............................................................................................. 21 Appendix B. Regional Transit Market Analysis .................................................................................................. 46 Appendix C. Transit Circulator Design ................................................................................................................ 64 Appendix D. Transit Center Site Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 764 Appendix E. Transit Development Plan ............................................................................................................... 79 DRAFT Page i• Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. Table of Figures Figure 1 Existing
    [Show full text]
  • Division Street Corridor Development Plan Divisionconnects Study Phase 1
    Division Street Corridor Development Plan DivisionConnects Study Phase 1 Prepared for Spokane Regional Transportation Council Spokane Transit Authority May 2021 Prepared by Parametrix 835 North Post, Suite 201 Spokane, WA 99201 T. 509.328.3371 F. 1.855.542.6353 www.parametrix.com CITATION Parametrix. 2021. DivisionConnects Corridor Development Plan. Prepared by Parametrix, Spokane, Washington. March 2021. Division Street Corridor Development Plan Spokane Regional Transportation Council Spokane Transit Authority TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 Why DivisionConnects? ES-1 Current State of the Corridor ES-2 A Plan to Improve Bus Service ES-3 Options Considered ES-3 A Vision for the Future ES-8 What's Next? ES-9 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Project Purpose and Description 1-1 1.2 Purpose of This Plan 1-1 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND 2-1 2.1 Study Corridor 2-1 2.2 The North Spokane Corridor 2-1 2.3 Existing Conditions 2-3 2.3.1 Traffic 2-3 2.3.2 Transit 2-3 2.3.3 Active Transportation 2-4 2.3.4 Safety 2-4 2.3.5 Demographics 2-4 2.3.6 Land Use 2-5 2.3.7 Historic and Cultural Resources 2-5 3. PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT 3-1 3.1 Advisory Committees 3-1 3.1.1 Steering Committee 3-1 3.1.2 Agency Team 3-1 3.2 Focus Groups 3-2 3.3 Property Owner Interviews 3-2 3.4 Online and Social Media Activities 3-2 3.4.1 Project Website 3-2 3.4.2 Questionnaire #1 3-2 3.4.3 Social Pinpoint 3-2 3.4.4 Online Open House (ESRI StoryMap) 3-3 3.4.5 Social Media 3-3 3.4.6 Electronic Newsletters 3-3 3.5 Other Activities 3-3 3.5.1 Corridor Mailer 3-3 3.5.2 Print Media 3-3 3.5.3 Statistically Significant Survey 3-3 Division Street Corridor Development Plan Spokane Regional Transportation Council Spokane Transit Authority i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Board Meeting
    Spokane Transit Authority 1230 West Boone Avenue Spokane, WA 99201-2686 (509) 325-6000 NOTICE OF BOARD MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Board of Directors of the Spokane Transit Authority of Spokane County, Washington, that the Board will hold a meeting at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 19, 2020, in the Spokane Transit Boardroom, 1230 West Boone Avenue, Spokane, Washington. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that business to be discussed and/or action taken shall be in accordance with the attached agenda, which is also on file at the STA Administrative Offices. THE MEETING SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. BY ORDER OF THE STA BOARD OF DIRECTORS. DATED this 19th day of March 2020. Dana Infalt Executive Assistant to the CEO & Clerk of the Authority SPOKANE TRANSIT AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING OF March 19, 2020 AGENDA ITEM 2 : APPROVE BOARD AGENDA REFERRAL COMMITTEE: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Al French, STA Board Chair SUMMARY: At this time, the STA Board will review and approve the meeting agenda with any revisions enclosed in the grey folders. RECOMMENDATION TO BOARD: Approve Board agenda. FINAL REVIEW FOR BOARD BY: Division Head Chief Executive Officer __________ Legal Counsel Spokane Transit Authority 1230 West Boone Avenue Spokane, WA 99201-2686 (509) 325-6000 BOARD MEETING Thursday, March 19, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. Spokane Transit Authority Boardroom 1230 West Boone Avenue, Spokane, Washington AGENDA Estimated meeting time: 90 minutes 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Approve Board Agenda (Al French) 3. Public Expressions 4. Recognitions and Presentations: 5 minutes A.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning & Development Committee Meeting
    Spokane Transit Authority 1230 West Boone Avenue Spokane, WA 99201-2686 (509) 325-6000 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, May 5, 2021 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. Via Video Conference Committee Members: Click here to join the meeting General Public: Click here to view the meeting Audio Conference: Call the number below and enter the access code. +1-408-418-9388 | Access code: 187 210 0093 AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Committee Chair Report (5 minutes) 3. Committee Action (5 minutes) A. Minutes of the March 31, 2021 Committee Meeting -- Corrections/Approval 4. Committee Action A. Board Consent Agenda (10 minutes) 1. Division BRT: Acceptance of Corridor Development Plan (Otterstrom/Tresidder) 2. City Line: Award of Contract for Wall Street Reconstruction, and Station 28 (Otterstrom/Bielaski) B. Board Discussion Agenda (No items being presented this month.) 5. Reports to Committee (40 minutes) A. 2022-2027 Transit Development Plan: Mid-Range Planning Guidance (Otterstrom/Tresidder) B. 2022-2027 Transit Development Plan: Major Activities (2022-2027) (Otterstrom/Tresidder) C. 2022-2027 Transit Development Plan: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (Otterstrom/Liard) D. 2022-2027 Transit Development Plan: Proposed 2022-2024 Service Improvements (Otterstrom/Weinand/Kenney) 6. CEO Report (15 minutes) 7. Committee Information (No items being presented this month.) 8. June 2, 2021 Committee Meeting Draft Agenda Review (5 minutes) 9. New Business (5 minutes) 10. Committee Members’ Expressions (5 minutes) 11. Adjourn Next Committee Meeting: Wednesday, June 2, 2021, 10:00 a.m. via Webex. Agendas of regular Committee and Board meetings are posted the Friday afternoon preceding each meeting at the STA’s website: www.spokanetransit.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Financial Analysis
    OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY of WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009
    Transportation 2009 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Transportation 2009 Chapter 12: Transportation Page 231 CITY OF WESTMINSTER Transportation 2009 What is the Transportation Element? Community Vision for At the 1997 session, the General Assembly passed five Transportation pieces of legislation and budget initiatives known collectively as "Smart Growth." Maryland has adopted the principles of Smart Growth to be incorporated into the According to the 2008 Community Survey, Comprehensive Plan. Westminster drivers are concerned with the difficulties they encounter turning on and The following Smart Growth principle relates to the Transportation Element: off roads due to issues with visibility or merging. Some residents suggested that the Facilitate an adequate mix of transportation modes City should consider the addition of lanes, roundabouts, or left turn signals. A second To reduce traffic congestion throughout the City challenge with driving in Westminster is the To coordinate land use and transportation high volume of traffic. Residents describe traffic to be an issue on Route 140 during To create resiliency, and connectivity within the City commuting times in the early morning or road networks early evening because of the high number of To ensure connectivity between pedestrian, bike, commuters that leave Westminster everyday to work outside of Carroll County. transit, and road facilities From the timing to the synchronization, Revitalize existing neighborhoods into safe, residents listed challenges with traffic lights walkable, and livable communities throughout Westminster. In some cases, it is not the use of a traffic light, but rather the To mix land uses and build compactly, thus reducing lack of a traffic light that most concerned trips and make walking a more viable alternative residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Route(S) Description 26 the Increased Frequency on the 26 Makes the Entire Southwestern Portion of the Network Vastly More Useful
    Route(s) Description 26 The increased frequency on the 26 makes the entire southwestern portion of the network vastly more useful. Please keep it. The 57, 60, and 61 came south to the area but having frequent service in two directions makes it much better, and riders from these routes can connect to the 26 and have much more areas open to them. Thank you. Green Line The increased weekend service on the Green line to every twenty minutes is a good addition of service for Campbell which is seeing markedly better service under this plan. Please keep the increased service. Multiple Please assuage public concerns about the 65 and 83 by quantifying the impact the removal of these routes would have, and possible cheaper ways to reduce this impact. The fact is that at least for the 65, the vast majority of the route is duplicative, and within walking distances of other routes. Only south of Hillsdale are there more meaningful gaps. Mapping the people who would be left more than a half mile (walkable distance) away from service as a result of the cancellation would help the public see what could be done to address the service gap, and quantifying the amount of people affected may show that service simply cannot be justified. One idea for a route would be service from winchester transit center to Princeton plaza mall along camden and blossom hill. This could be done with a single bus at a cheaper cost than the current 65. And nobody would be cut off. As far as the 83 is concerned, I am surprised the current plan does not route the 64 along Mcabee, where it would be eq..
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report
    HISTORIC HIGHWAY BRIDGES IN MARYLAND: 1631-1960: HISTORIC CONTEXT REPORT Prepared for: Maryland State Highway Administration Maryland State Department of Transportation 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: P.A.C. Spero & Company 40 West Chesapeake Avenue, Suite 412 Baltimore, Maryland 21204 and Louis Berger & Associates 1001 East Broad Street, Suite 220 Richmond, Virginia 23219 July 1995 Revised October 1995 Acknowledgements "Historic Highway Bridges in Maryland: 1631-1960: Historic Context Report" has been prepared with the generous assistance of the Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration's Environmental Management Section and Bridge Development Division, and the historic and cultural resources staff of the Maryland Historical Trust. The preparers of this report would like to thank Cynthia Simpson, Rita Suffness, and Bruce Grey of the State Highway Administration Environmental Management Section, and Jim Gatley, Alonzo Corley, and Chris Barth of the State Highway Administration Bridge Development Division for their aid in providing access to key research materials. Thanks are also extended to Ron Andrews, Beth Hannold, Bill Pencek, Mary Louise de Sarran, and Barbara Shepard--all of the staff of the Maryland Historical Trust, and to the members of the Advisory Committee appointed to review this report. In addition we extend special appreciation to Rita Suffness, Architectural/Bridge Historian for the Maryland State Highway Administration, for providing us with numerous background materials, analyses, research papers, histories, and a draft historic bridge context report which she authored, for use in preparing this report. The final report was prepared by P.A.C. Spero & Company. Research, analysis, graphics preparation, and report writing were conducted by Paula Spero, Michael Reis, James DuSel, Kate Elliot, Laura Landefeld, and Deborah Scherkoske of P.A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Construction Program
    2019 Construction Program PennDOT Engineering District 1 SERVING CRAWFORD, ERIE, FOREST, MERCER, VENANGO, AND WARREN COUNTIES Tom Wolf, Governor Leslie S. Richards, Secretary of Transportation James A. Foringer, P.E., District Executive Contact Information PennDOT Engineering District 1 255 Elm Street PO Box 398 Oil City, PA 16301 (814) 678-7085 Business Hours: 8:00 AM — 4:30 PM Monday — Friday PennDOT’s Engineering District 1 is responsible for the state-maintained transportation network in this region. This includes 3,689 miles of roadway and 2,064 bridges in the six-county area. 2 Overall 2019 Construction Program • Projected 2019 Program: $125.44M • 2018 Program: $92.84M 3 District 1 2019 Construction Program Thank you for your interest in the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation District 1 Construction Program for 2019. This publication is intended to provide a general overview of projects that currently are under construction, and those scheduled to be awarded or begin construction in 2019. The 2019 Construction Book is divided into seven sections: one representing projects spanning the entire district or multiple counties and one representing each of the six counties in the district. Award dates, expected completion dates, project descriptions, project locations, costs, and maintenance of traffic are listed. The listed estimated cost for a project is for the construction phase only. County maps have also been included for reference. Please keep this book on hand throughout the upcoming construction season. Note: All information is correct as of the distribution date of this booklet. However, all dates and costs are estimated and, therefore, are subject to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Route Manager
    Spokane Transit Authority 1230 West Boone Avenue Spokane, WA 99201-2686 (509) 325-6000 NOTICE OF BOARD MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Board of Directors of the Spokane Transit Authority of Spokane County, Washington, that the Board will hold a meeting at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 16, 2019, in the Spokane Transit Boardroom, 1230 West Boone Avenue, Spokane, Washington. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that business to be discussed and/or action taken shall be in accordance with the attached agenda, which is also on file at the STA Administrative Offices. THE MEETING SHALL BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. BY ORDER OF THE STA BOARD OF DIRECTORS. DATED this 16th day of May, 2019. Dana Infalt Executive Assistant to the CEO & Clerk of the Authority SPOKANE TRANSIT AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING OF May 16, 2019 AGENDA ITEM __2____: APPROVE BOARD AGENDA REFERRAL COMMITTEE: N/A SUBMITTED BY: Candace Mumm, STA Board Chair SUMMARY: At this time, the STA Board will review and approve the meeting agenda with any revisions enclosed in the grey folders. RECOMMENDATION TO BOARD: Approve Board agenda. FINAL REVIEW FOR BOARD BY: Division Head // Chief Executive Officer ESM Legal Counsel LM Spokane Transit Authority 1230 West Boone Avenue Spokane, WA 99201-2686 (509) 325-6000 BOARD MEETING Thursday, May 16, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. Spokane Transit Authority Boardroom 1230 West Boone Avenue, Spokane, Washington DRAFT AGENDA Estimated meeting time: 90 minutes 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Approve Board Agenda (Candace Mumm) 3. Public Expressions 4. Recognitions and Presentations: 5 minutes A.
    [Show full text]