DOCSLIB.ORG

Seedling No. Seed Suppliers Year Released Authors/Breeder Institutions Published Data Paren

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seedling No. Seed Suppliers Year Released Authors/Breeder Institutions Published Data Paren Official Variety Seedling No. Seed Suppliers Year Authors/Breeder Institutions Published Data Parentage* PVP# Name (Seedling Released FemalexMale No.) ABEILLE (growers) 2002 Les Buissons 2002 Saginaw Gold x Research Center, TATA 9192-15 QC ABNAKI (growers) 1970 Akeley, Murphy & USDA, New York APJ -47:229 X1276-185 x Cetas & Maine (1970) B4116-2 AC BELMONT (growers) 1991 Tarn, et al. Ag. Canada, NB APJ 72:409-415 Raritan x F51013 (1995) AC BLUE PRIDE 1994 Proudfoot, et al. Ag. Canada, NF NA N713-16 x N889- 78-3 AC BRADOR 1991 Tarn, et al. Ag. Canada, NB APJ 72:401-408 F61101 x F60034 (1995) AC CHALEUR 1993 DeJong, et al. Ag. Canada, APJ 72:393-399 Belleisle x N457 Fred., NB (1995) AC DOMINO 1990 Proudfoot, et al. Ag. Canada, St 1977 Blue Mac x SVP Johns, Nfld. AM66-42 AC DUBUC 1998 AAFC Res Sta Canada BR 64633-2 x F59103 AC GLACIER CHIP WIS75-30 2000 Lynch, et al. Canada AJPR 78: 327- Wischip x Wis69- 200100043 332 (2001) 49.74 AC LR RUSSET 2002 AAFC Res Ctr Ag Canada, Clonal variant of BURBANK Lethbridge Russet Burbank AC MAPLE GOLD WIS75-30 2000 Lynch, et al. Canada AJPR 78: 339- Wischip E x Wis69- 343 (2001) 49 AC NOVACHIP 1991 DeJong, et al. Ag. Canada, NB APJ 72:417-425 F68061 x F66011 (1995) AC RED ISLAND 2000 Proudfoot, K AAFC, St Johns, Brigus x Redsen Nfld AC PEREGRINE ND2937-3 2000 Lynch, et al. Ag. Canada, NB AJPR 78: 333- ND372-2R X RED 337 (2001) ND2223-8R AC PTARMIGAN F76080 1992 Lynch, et al. Ag. Canada, APJ 71:387-393 ND6993-13 x Lethbridge (1994) F59103 AC RED ISLAND 2000 Proudfoot, K AAFC, St John's, Brigus x Redsen Newfoundland AC SAGUENOR 1986 Ag Canada Res Lab La Pocatière, QC 1998 Hudson x F73008 Canada AC STAMPEDE TAXV675-27 1998 Lynch, et al. Ag & Agri-Food AJPR 77: 241- Lehmi Russet x 200500177 RUSSET Can, TX A&M 244 (2000) BR7091-1 AC SUNBURY F80054 2002 Murphy, et al. Canada AJPR 79: 397- Raritan x Y66-13- 402 (2002) 636 ACADIA RUSSET 1981 Tarn & Young Ag. Canada, NB APJ 60:925-931 Bake-King x (1983) Norgold Russet ACCUMULATOR 2012 Navarro, et al. UWI-Madison NA Snowden x S438 ADIRONDACK 2003 DeJong, W, et al. Cornell Univ. 200900287 BLUE ADIRONDACK 2004 DeJong, W, et al. Cornell Univ. 200900288 RED AGASSIZ Veg cultivar desc for 1983 Lauer, et al. Minnesota NA MN321.64-11 x North America MN305.64-10 ALAMO (B5066-3) 1967 Akeley, Perry & Peel USDA & Texas APJ 45:139-141 Kennebec x (1968) Merrimack ALASCLEAR (AK14-70-1-720 1981 Dearborn USDA & Alaska APJ 60:189-192 AK1-62-90-64 x (1983) Ontario ALASKA 114 1954 Dearborn USDA & Alaska APJ 37:108-110 Irish Cobbler x (1960) MN13-1 ALASKA 1967 Dearborn USDA & Alaska APJ 46:1-4 Alaska 114 x 27- FROSTLESS (1969) 11 ALASKA RED 1976 Dearborn USDA & Alaska APJ 54:365-369 Red Beauty x AK- (1977) 11-57-1-59 ALASKA RUSSET 1964 Dearborn USDA & Alaska APJ 41:137-139 Columbia Russet (1964) Sdlg. x MN15-2 ALLAGASH 1980 Reeves, et al. Maine APJ 57:553-559 BR7093-56 x RUSSET (1980) B6024-3 ALLEGANY 1989 Plaisted, et al. New York APJ 67:227-231 M297-17 x GN (1990) bulk pollen ALPINE RUSSET (A9305-10) 2008 Whitworth, et al. USDA- APJ 88:256-268 A8343-12 x ARS,ID,OR,WA (2011) A85103-3 201000084 ALTA CROWN 2007 Ag and Agri- AJPR 88:72-81 AC83172-1RU x Canada 03- Bizimungu, et al Food Canada (2011) CO86030-1RU 3569 ALTA RUSSET 2002 Ag and Ag Food AJPR 81:195-201 Russet Nugget x Lynch, et al Canada (2004) Ranger Russet 200400230 ALTURAS 2002 AJPR 80:295-302 A77182-1 x Novy, et al USDA-ARS, ID, OR,(2003) WA A75188-3 200200158 AMA ROSA (PORO1PG22-1) 2010 USDA-ARS, OR, AJPR 89:249-254 PA97B23-2 x Red Brown, et al ID, WA (2012) Bulk 201100297 AMEY(B9922-1) 1999 Haynes, et al. USDA, Maine, APJ 78:175-181 B6987-145 X NY, Penn., NJ, (2001) B7805-I NC, & Virginia ANDOVER (NYE55-44) 1995 Plaisted, et al. New York AJPR 75:113-116 Allegany x (1998) Atlantic ANTIGO 1955 Rieman and Young Wisconsin APJ 32:407-410 Menominee x (1955) 302.44-6 ASHWORTH 1946 Reddick & Peterson New York APJ 24:319-336 CPB-1 x AQF-4 (1947) ATLANTIC & GROWERS 1976 Webb, et al. USDA, Maine, APJ 55:141-145 Wauseon x USDA Florida, & New (1978) B5141-6 Jersey AVON 1958 Young, et al. Ag. Canada, NB APJ 39:363-367 F1464-26 x USDA (1962) X96-56 BAKE-KING 1967 Plaisted & Peterson New York APJ 44:287-291 Merrimack x (1967) Green Mt. BANNOCK (A81473-2) 2002 Novy, et al. Idaho, Oregon & AJPR 79: 147- A75175-1 x 200100011 RUSSET Washington 153 (2002) A75788-3 BATOCHE 1976 Russel & Young Ag. Canada & NA Scott 2774-3R x Prairie Provinces Redskin BEACON 2005 MI State Univ, CHIPPER Maine Seed Potato Board and Maine AJPR 83:241-247 Douches, et al Potato Board (2006) Unknown BELCHIP 1979 Webb, et al. USDA, Florida, APJ 57:61-65 Wauseon x B5141- New Jersey, (1980) 6 Maine & Virginia BELLEISLE 1974 Young & Davies Ag. Canada, NB APJ 52:51-55 SSRPB 834c(29) x (1975) F4724 (F47024)** BELRUS 1978 Webb, et al. USDA, Florida & APJ 58:111-116 W245-2 x Maine (1981) Penobscot BELTSVILLE APJ. 68:453-459 (1990) BISON 1974 Johansen, et al. North Dakota APJ 54:189-193 ND 5124-1R x ND (1977) 4652-4R BLANCA 1959 Edmundson, et al. USDA & APJ 38:236-239 USDA X627-164 x Colorado (1961) USDA B929-32 BLAZER RUSSET GROWERS 2005 USDA-ARS, ID, AJPR 84:447-457 A7816-14 x Stark, et al OR, WA (2007) Norking Russet 200600201 BOONE 1955 Haynes, Stevenson, USDA & North APJ 33:315-318 T1-5 x B231-3 Akeley & Cochran Carolina (1956) BOULDER (MSF373-8) 2003 Douches, et al Michigan AJPR 80:345-352 NY88 X MS7-2-80 200400308 (2003) BUTTE 1977 Pavek, et al. USDA, Idaho, APJ 55:685-690 A492-2 x Norgold Washington & (1978) Russet Oregon CALROSE 1946 C.F. Clark USDA APJ 23:343-347 Ackersegen x (1946) Katahdin CANOGA 1950 Livermore New York APJ 28:672-674 Albion x Katahdin (1951) CANSO 1951 Young Ag. Canada, NB APJ 28:697-698 S. demissium x (1951) Earlaine CANUS 1949 Stevenson & DeLong USDA & Canada APJ 26:326-330 GS9-11 x USDA (1949) S24642 CARIBE 1981 Young & De Jong Ag. Canada, NB APJ 61:281-286 F55066 x USDA (1984) X96-56 CARIBOO 1967 Maurer, et al. Ag. Canada, BC APJ 45:247-249 SSRPB 1256a(23) (1968) x K113-1 CARLTON 1982 Russell, et al. Ag. Canada, MB APJ 60:599-605 F47024 x F55069 (1983) CASCADE 1969 Hoyman USDA & APJ 47:261- USDA B3820-14 x Washington 263(1970) PI214372 CASTILE 1991 Webb, Halseth, et al. New York & APJ 68:453- Peconic x F107-30 USDA Beltsville 459(1991) CATOOSA 1959 Dykstra, Gilmore & USDA, APJ 38:300- (Pontiac x USDA Miller Tennessee, & 303(1961) Self Louisiana CAYUGA 1946 Blodgett & Stevenson USDA & New APJ 23:315- Hindenburg x York 329(1946) Katahdin CENTENNIAL 1976 Twomey, Hoyman & USDA & APJ 54:603- Nooksack x W12- RUSSET Shaughnessy Colorado 605(1977) 3 GROWERS CENTURY (A74212-1) GROWERS 1995 Pavek, et al. USDA, Oregon, AJPR 77:161-165 A6789-7 x A6680- RUSSET Idaho, Wash., (2000) 5 Colorado, Calif & Texas CHENANGO 1946 Reddick & Peterson New York APJ 24:331- USDA S46110 x 335(1947) New York BXS/1 CHEROKEE 1951 Peterson, Ellis, Akeley USDA, Iowa & APJ 31:53- USDA X96-56 x & Stevenson Indiana 58(1954) USDA X528-170 CHIEFTAIN 1966 Weigle, Kehr, Akeley USDA & Iowa APJ 45:293- LA 1354 x IA 1027- GROWERS &Horton 296(1968) 18 CHINOOK APJ 43:1-5 (1966) CHISAGO 1949 Krantz, Eide, USDA & APJ 26:264- Irish Cobbler x Turnquist, Griffith & Minnesota 269(1949) MN13-1 Tolaas CLASSIC RUSSET (A95109-1) GROWERS 2009 USDA-ARS, ID, AJPR 87:360-373 Blazer Russet x Stark, et al OR, WA (2010) Summit Russet 200900441 CLEARWATER (A0A95154-1) 2008 AJPR RUSSET USDA-ARS, ID, 87:458—471 Bannock Russet x Novy, et al OR, WA (2010) A89152-4 201000085 COASTAL CHIP (B9792-157) 1990 Webb USDA, Virginia, APJ 69:515- Wauseon x B5141- New York, New 523(1992) 6 Jersey, Maine, & North Carolina COASTAL 1988 Sieczka, et al. USDA-Beltsville, APJ 65:407- Russet Burbank x RUSSET New York, 413(1988) B8281-5 Florida, Virginia, New Jersey & Maine COLUMBIA - - - APJ 14:93- - RUSSET 99(1937) COLORADO GROWERS 2001 CO NA ROSE NDTX9-1068-11R Holm, et al x DT6063-1R 200500210 CONESTOGA 1982 Johnston, Rowberry Ag. Canada, APJ 60:193- G6652 x G7063 & Alex Univ. of Guelph 197(1983) CORTLAND 1947 Reddick & Peterson New York APJ 27:1- Russet Rural x 10(1950) Katahdin x Menominee CRESTONE 2010 CO NA AC91014-2RU x RUSSET Holm, et al Silverton Russet 201400088 2009 USDA- NA CRIMSON RED Oregon ARS,ID,OR,WA NA 2011002.51 CRYSTAL 1980 Johansen, North Dakota APJ 59:131- ND7196-18 x Farnsworth, Secor, 137(1982) Cascade Nelson, Orr & Lana DAKCHIP 1979 Johansen, North Dakota APJ 57:567- Norchip x Farnsworth, Secor, 571(1980) Cascade Nelson, Orr & Lana DAKOTA CRISP 2005 NDSU Ag Exp AJPR 84:477-486 Yankee Chipper x Thompson, et al Sta. (2007) Norchip 200600110 DAKOTA 2005 NDSU Ag Exp AJPR 85:171-182 ND4103-2 x DIAMOND Thompson, et al Sta.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2018 Potato Postharvest Processing Evaluation Report
    Postharvest Processing Evaluation of Alaska Grown Potatoes A Specialty Crop Block Grant Project Introduction Potatoes have long been a staple produce of Alaskan agriculture. Between the years 2009-2016 Alaska growers have produced between 130,000 to 155,000 cwt annually amounting to over 2 million dollars in sales each year (2017 Alaska Annual Bulletin). There has been increasing interest in the use of Alaska Grown potatoes for processing in the local chipping and restaurant market, but this effort hasn’t been supported with data on the processing quality of our locally produced potatoes. To better meet the needs of the food service industries and to promote a growing market for producers, the Alaska Plant Materials Center (PMC) undertook a postharvest evaluation on our collection of potato varieties grown on site in Palmer, Alaska. The results of this research present timely and relevant data to Alaskan growers, processors and consumers. On a national level, the processing industry accounts for nearly 60% of potatoes produced annually. This trend has caused potato breeders to select for processing qualities, and quite a few processing cultivars have been recently registered and released for use. Although some of these newer varieties are grown here in Alaska, they have not been evaluated and compared to the data collected by growers in other regions or compared to established varieties that are known to do well here. Even if the physical qualities of the varieties were comparable to those grown elsewhere, Alaska is unlikely to compete in the national processing market because of our distance from any commercial processing facility and the small “family farm” scale of operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Potatoes in the Home Garden
    for the Gardener Growing Potatoes in the Home Garden f you could cultivate a vegetable crop that could be grown in almost every climate (except hot tropical zones) from sea level to 15,000 feet, could be eaten for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks, prepared in a myriad of ways, be easily kept Iwithout processing or refrigeration for up to 6-8 months, produced high yields (2-5 pounds per square foot) and was extremely nutritious (high in protein, vitamin C, niacin, B vitamins, iron and energy) but low in calories (sans butter and sour cream), you would wouldn’t you? If you did you would be in the minority of home gardeners. Most gardeners eschew the illustrious “spud” (Solanum tuberosum), thinking it doesn’t warrant space in the small garden and that home grown potatoes don’t taste much better than their store-bought counterparts. Not true! Wrong on both counts. Solanum tuberosum (the Andean potato) originated in the highlands of the Andes mountain ranges of South America (Peru, Columbia, Ecuador, Bolivia) at elevations up to 15,000 feet. Potatoes have been in cultivation for more than 2000 years and there are more than 2,000-3,000 Beveridge Melisa varieties extant today. It is an herbaceous perennial in its native habitat, but treated as a tender annual in the temperate zones and damaged by frost at 28-30°F. The plant’s only edible portions are the tubers produced underground, apically (at the tip) on stolons (horizontal underground stems; see drawing at right). While potatoes produce viable seed, the genetic makeup of sexually- produced plants is so diverse and variable (heterozygous) that production from this seed is negligible.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Potato - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Log in / create account Article Talk Read View source View history Our updated Terms of Use will become effective on May 25, 2012. Find out more. Main page Potato Contents From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Featured content Current events "Irish potato" redirects here. For the confectionery, see Irish potato candy. Random article For other uses, see Potato (disambiguation). Donate to Wikipedia The potato is a starchy, tuberous crop from the perennial Solanum tuberosum Interaction of the Solanaceae family (also known as the nightshades). The word potato may Potato Help refer to the plant itself as well as the edible tuber. In the region of the Andes, About Wikipedia there are some other closely related cultivated potato species. Potatoes were Community portal first introduced outside the Andes region four centuries ago, and have become Recent changes an integral part of much of the world's cuisine. It is the world's fourth-largest Contact Wikipedia food crop, following rice, wheat and maize.[1] Long-term storage of potatoes Toolbox requires specialised care in cold warehouses.[2] Print/export Wild potato species occur throughout the Americas, from the United States to [3] Uruguay. The potato was originally believed to have been domesticated Potato cultivars appear in a huge variety of [4] Languages independently in multiple locations, but later genetic testing of the wide variety colors, shapes, and sizes Afrikaans of cultivars and wild species proved a single origin for potatoes in the area
    [Show full text]
  • ML 2005 First Special Session, [Chap.__1__], Article __2__, Sec.[__11__], Subd. 7(I)____
    2008 Project Abstract For the Period Ending June 30, 2010 PROJECT TITLE: Improving Water Quality on the Central Sands PROJECT MANAGER: John Moncrief and Carl Rosen AFFILIATION: University of Minnesota MAILING ADDRESS: University of MN, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, Dept. Soil, Water & Climate CITY/STATE/ZIP: St. Paul, MN 55108 PHONE: 612-625-2771 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: N/A FUNDING SOURCE: Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund LEGAL CITATION: ML 2005 First Special Session, [Chap.__1__], Article __2__, Sec.[__11__], Subd._7(i)____ Appropriation Language: As amended by ML 2008, Chap. 367, Sec. 2, Subd. 15 Carryforward APPROPRIATION AMOUNT: $587,000 Overall Project Outcome and Results Nitrate leaching to groundwater and phosphorus runoff to surface water are major concerns in sandy ecoregions in Minnesota. Some of these concerns can be attributed to agricultural crop management. This project was comprised of research, demonstration, and outreach to address strategies that can be used to minimize or reduce nitrate leaching and phosphorus runoff in agricultural settings. Research evaluating slowed nitrogen transformation products, nitrogen application timing, and nitrogen rates was conducted on potatoes, kidney beans, and corn under irrigation on sandy soils. For potatoes, variety response to nitrogen rate, source, and timing was also evaluated. Results showed several nitrogen management approaches reduced nitrate leaching while maintaining economic yields. Based on these results, promising treatments were demonstrated at a field scale using cost share monies. In some cases, producers tested or adopted new practices without the cost share incentive. • For potatoes, results show that at equivalent nitrogen rates, use of slow release nitrogen reduced nitrate leaching on average by 20 lb nitrogen per acre.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Potato Directory 2017
    The farm operation grows 93 acres of field generations one and two seed, operates 4 greenhouses producing conventional and NFT minitubers. Our stewardship of this seed continues through WISCONSIN the certification Our of stewardship these seed oflots this on seed Wisconsin continues seed through grower t farms, there is no other program like it. CERTIFIED The program maintains variety trueness to type; selecting and testing clones, rogueing of weak, genetic variants, and diseased plants to continue to develop and maintain germplasm of your SEED POTATOES favorite varieties at our laboratory. 103 Years of Seed Growing Tradition A Century Long Tradition Pioneers In Seed Potato Certification Administered since inception by the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Madison, the program Much of the early research work on potato diseases and how retains a full-time staff of experienced professionals to ensure they spread was done Scientists in Germany found and that, Holland through around careful the monitoring turn thoroughness and impartiality in inspection and certification of the century. Scientists found that, through careful monitoring procedures. o of the crop and removal of unhealthy plants, Similar they could research maintain soon was a vigorous, healthy stock indefinitely. Similar research soon was Through providing information, exercising technical skill, doing b being conducted in the United States. research directed at solving problems, and conducting outreach activities, the University meets the growers at the field level. USDA plant pathologist W.A. Orton had studied potato This special relationship to the academic community brings new certification in Germany and upon his return, began to work with T information on pathogens, best practices, and introduces high potato growers and Universities to introduce those concepts quality basic seed into the marketplace.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Potato Crop Year Research Reports
    MINNESOTA AREA II POTATO RESEARCH AND PROMOTION COUNCIL AND NORTHERN PLAINS POTATO GROWERS ASSOCIATION 2020 RESEARCH REPORTS Table of Contents 3. Vine Desiccation as an Effective Disease Management Strategy to Control Verticillium Wilt of Potato N. Gudmestad 9. Evaluation of a Promising Minnesota Clone for N Response, Agronomic Traits & Storage Quality S. Gupta, J. Crants, M. McNearney & C. Rosen 16. Measuring Bruise Susceptibility Among New Fresh Market & Processing Varieties in Storage D. Haagenson 19. Baseline Evaluation of Pollinator Landscape Plantings Bordering Commercial Potato I.MacRae 25. Management of Colorado Potato Beetle in Minnesota & North Dakota I. MacRae 30. Managing PVY Vectors, 2019 I. MacRae 37. Carryover of Imazamox in Soil of Potato Fields A. Robinson 43. Evaluation of Fresh Potato Cultivars in the Field and Storage A. Robinson & D. Haagenson 46. Late Blight Spore Trapping Network for Minnesota A. Robinson & N. Gudmestad 52. ND Fresh Market Potato-Cultivar/Selection Trial Results for 2019 A. Robinson, E. Brandvik & P. Ihry 56. A Novel Approach to Manage Nitrogen Fertilizer for Potato Production Using Remote Sensing C. Rosen, J. Crants, M. McNearney & B. Bohman 65. Effects of Application Timing & Banded Versus Broadcast Application of ESN on Russet Burbank Potatoes C. Rosen, J. Crants & M. McNearney 79. Evaluation of Aspire, MicroEssentials S10 & MicroEssentials SZ as Sources of Potassium, Phosphate, Sulfur, Boron & Zinc for Russet Burbank Potatoes C. Rosen, J. Crants, & M. McNearney 87. Evaluation of Co-Granulated Formulation of K & B for Russet Burbank Potato Production C. Rosen, J. Crants & M. McNearney 94. Optimizing Planting Configuration, Planting Density, & N Rate for Russet Burbank Potato Production C.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Scab Susceptibility of 24 Most Popular Potato Cultivars in USA, Utilizing a Greenhouse Assay with Three Different Pathoge
    Common scab susceptibility of 24 most popular potato cultivars in USA, utilizing a greenhouse assay with three different pathogenic Streptomyces strains (species) Increasing disease score 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Norland No data R Norkotah (ND) R Norkotah (ID) Shepody R Norkotah (ND) Ranger Russet No data R Norkotah (ID) R Norkotah 296 R Norkotah ID Norkotah 3 Red La Soda Shepody Yukon Gold Norkotah 8 Shepody Premier Russet Alturas Norkotah 8 Pike Premier Russet Dk Red Norland Norland Yukon Gold Norkotah 3 Russet Burbank Red La Soda Atlantic R Norkotah 296 Russet Burbank Ranger Russet Gold Rush Dk Red Norland Red La Soda Alturas R Norkotah 296 Megachip Snowden Superior Atlantic Superior Yukon Gold Snowden Russet Burbank Megachip Silverton russet Megachip Rio Grande Yukon Gold ME Dakota Pearl Atlantic Canela russet Dakota Pearl Premier Russet Yukon Gold (ID) Norkotah 3 Norland Dakota Pearl Snowden Silverton russet Superior Canela russet Dk Red Norland Pike R Norkotah ND Yukon Gold (WI) S. scabies Blazer Russet S. stelliscabiei Gold Rush S. species IdX Pike Rio Grande Alturas ME01-11h NY02-1c ID01-12c Gold Rush Yukon Gold 5.1e8 CFU/pot Norkotah 8 1.2e9 CFU/pot Blazer Russet 1e9 CFU/pot Ranger Russet Silverton russet Rio Grande Canela russet Blazer Russet Cultivars are listed along the left side of graphs, ranked by disease severity, with most susceptible at the top and most resistant at the bottom. Disease score is a combination of type of lesion (surface, pits or raised lesions) and amount of surface area affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato Glossary
    A Potato Glossary A Potato Glossary by Richard E. Tucker Last revised 15 Sep 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Richard E. Tucker Introduction This glossary has been prepared as a companion to A Potato Chronology. In that work, a self-imposed requirement to limit each entry to a single line forced the use of technical phrases, scientific words, jargon and terminology that may be unfamiliar to many, even to those in the potato business. It is hoped that this glossary will aid those using that chronology, and it is hoped that it may become a useful reference for anyone interested in learning more about potatoes, farming and gardening. There was a time, a century or more ago, when nearly everyone was familiar with farming life, the raising of potatoes in particular and the lingo of farming in general. They were farmers themselves, they had relatives who farmed, they knew someone who was a farmer, or they worked on a nearby farm during their youth. Then, nearly everyone grew potatoes in their gardens and sold the extra. But that was a long ago time. Now the general population is now separated from the farm by several generations. Only about 2 % of the US population lives on a farm and only a tiny few more even know anyone who lives on a farm. Words and phrases used by farmers in general and potato growers in particular are now unfamiliar to most Americans. Additionally, farming has become an increasingly complex and technical endeavor. Research on the cutting edge of science is leading to new production techniques, new handling practices, new varieties, new understanding of plant physiology, soil and pest ecology, and other advances too numerous to mention.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato Tuber Viruses: Mop-Top Management A1777
    NDSU EXTENSION NDSU EXTENSION EXTENDING KNOWLEDGEEXTENDING CHANGING KNOWLEDGE LIVES CHANGINGNDSU EXTENSION LIVES EXTENDING KNOWLEDGE CHANGING LIVES A1777 (Revised September 2018) Potato Tuber Viruses: Mop-top Management Andy Robinson Potato Extension Agronomist NDSU/University of Minnesota Department of Plant Sciences, NDSU Shashi K.R. Yellareddygari Research Scientist Department of Plant Pathology, NDSU Owusu Domfeh Student (former) Department of Plant Pathology, NDSU Neil Gudmestad University Distinguished Professor and Endowed Chair of Potato Pathology Department of Plant Pathology, NDSU The potato mop-top virus (PMTV) is spreading throughout the potato-growing regions in the U.S. This viral disease was con- firmed in Maine (2003), North Dakota (2010), Washington (2011), Idaho (2013), New Mexico (2015) and Colorado (2015). It also is found in production areas of Europe, South America and Asia. Figure 1. Tuber flesh exhibiting arcs, streaks and/or flecks Potato mop-top virus is seed- and soil-borne, and vectored when infected with mop-top virus. Flesh also may become by Spongospora subterranea f. sp. subterranea. It is the rust-colored or tinged with brown. (Owusu Domfeh) causal agent of powdery scab on potato. Once established in fields, powdery scab can survive for up to 18 years in the absence of a potato crop. Potato mop-top virus is of economic importance to potato growers throughout the U.S. because it may affect tuber quality and may be transferred from seed to daughter tubers. The potato mop-top virus is restricted primarily to the Solanaceae and Chenopodiaceae families. In addition to infested fields, PMTV has many other potential hosts, such as eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum), hairy nightshade (Solanum physalifolium), common lambsquarters (Chenpodium album) and sugar beets (Beta vulgaris).
    [Show full text]
  • El C U Lt Iv O D E La Pa Pa En G U a T Em a La
    Solanum tuberosum L. PREPARADO POR: Ing. Agr. Julio A. Franco Rivera COLABORADORES: Ing. Agr. Alvaro Del Cid H. Ing. Agr. Armando de Leon Ing. Agr. Guilermo Chavez PRIMERA EDICION GUATEMALA, SEPTIEMBRE DEL 2002. 2 Pág. 1. Introducción 2. Características botánicas, morfológicas y bromatológicas del cultivo 2.2. Morfología 2.2.1. Hábito de crecimiento 2.2.2. Raíces 2.2.3. Tallos 2.2.4. Hojas 2.2.5. Inflorescencia 2.2.6. Fruto, semilla 2.3. Composición química e importancia alimenticia 3. Condiciones agroclimáticas 3.1. Clima 3.2. Suelo 4. Cultivares recomendados 4.1. Variedad Loman 4.2. Variedad Tollocan 4.3. Variedad ICTA Chiquirichapa 4.4. Variedad ICTA Xalapan 4.5. Variedad Atzimba 4.6. Variedad ICTAFRIT 4.7. Variedad Atlantic 5. Manejo Agronómico 5.1. Preparación y enmienda al suelo 5.2. Siembra 5.3. Control de malezas y aporque 5.4. Fertilización 5.5. Manejo de plagas 5.5.1. Control de insectos del suelo 5.5.2. Control de insectos que atacan el follaje y los tubérculos 5.5.2.1. Chicharritas (Empoasca spp) 5.5.2.2. Polilla de la papa (Tecia solanivora y Phthorimaea operculella) 5.5.2.3. Pulguilla de la papa (Epitrix spp) 5.5.2.4. Mosca Minadora (Liriomyza huidobrensis) 5.5.2.5. El sílido de la papa o sílido del tomate (Paratrioza cockerelli) 5.5.3. Enfermedades fungosas, bacterianas y viróticas 5.5.3.1. El tizón tardío (Phytophthora infestans) 5.5.3.2. Rizoctoniasis (Rhizoctonia solani) 5.5.3.3. Pudrición bacteriana (Ralstonia solanacearum) 5.5.3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Foodservice Guide to Fresh Potato Types POTATOES
    THE PERFECT POTATO A Foodservice Guide to Fresh Potato Types POTATOES. THE PERFECT CANVAS FOR MENU INNOVATION. Potatoes aren’t just popular: they’re the #1 side dish in foodservice. You know that baked, mashed, roasted or fried, they have the remarkable ability to sell whatever you serve with them, enhancing presentations and adding value and appetite appeal. Now that you can tap into the intriguing shapes, colors and flavors of today’s exciting new potato types, innovation is easier than ever. No wonder so many chefs, from casual to fine dining, are reinventing potatoes in fresh new ways. So go ahead, grab a handful of potatoes and start thinking big. 1 A SPUD FOR ALL SEASONS AND REASONS. There are more than 4,000 potato varieties worldwide—though only a small fraction is commercialized. In the U.S., about 100 varieties are sold throughout the year to consistently meet the needs of the market. All of these varieties fit into one of five potato type categories: russet, red, white, yellow and specialty (including blue/purple, fingerling and petite). GET CREATIVE! We’ve created these at-a-glance potato type charts to help you find the right potato for any culinary purpose. Use them as a source of inspiration. Even when a potato type is recommended for a given application, another type may also work well to create a similar effect—or even a completely different, yet equally appealing result. Experiment with the types you have access to in new ways you haven’t tried. That’s the key to true menu innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Relative Salinity Tolerance of Potato Cultivars Assessed by <Emphasis Type="Italic">In Vitro </Emphasis> S
    Amer J of Potato Res (1998) 75:207-210 207 Relative Salinity Tolerance of Potato Cultivars Assessed By In Vitro Screening Tala Khrais 1, Y. Leclerc 2, and Danielle J. Donnelly3 ~Graduate student, 3Associate Professor., Plant Science Department, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, 21 111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9. -~Potato Physiologist. Potato Centre, New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, FlorenceviUe, NB, Canada E0J 1K0. Please send all correspondence to: Danielle J. Donnelly, Plant Science Department, Macdonald Campus, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 3V9, phone: (514) 398-7851 (ext. 7856#), fax: (514) 398-7897, e-mail: [email protected]. ABSTRACT imiento (longitud de las ralces y de los brotes, peso fresco y seco) en la cosecha y se corrigieron debido a One hundred and thirty European and North Amer- sus diferencias en el vigor de la planta. Estos valores ican potato cultivars were assayed in vitro for salinity relativos fueron sujetos a un awl]i~is de multivariaci6n (NaC1) tolerance. A modified single-node cutting bioas- de grupos. La suma de los rangos relativos a 40, 80 y say was used in which cultivars were exposed to a 120 mM NaCI separaron los cultivares en 8 unidades. range of NaC1 levels (0, 40, 80, and 120 mM), in a Los cultivares Amisk, Belrus, Bintje, Onaway, Sierra y Murashige and Skoog-based medium, for 1 month. Eval- Tobique estuvieron en la unidad con mayor tolerancia uations were performed twice for each cultivar at each a la salinidad yen el grupo con mayor vigor, con excep- salt level, using five single-node cuttings.
    [Show full text]