World Bank Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Bank Document ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (IDA Credit No 4832-NP, 5002-NP and IDA Grant No.H-339-NP, H-629-NP) Implementation Review August 26-September 04, 2013 Public Disclosure Authorized AIDE MEMOIRE I. Introduction and Acknowledgments 1. A World Bank review team1 (see Annex 1a for the Team members’ list) carried out an implementation review from August 26-September 04, 2013 of the Road Sector Development Project (RSDP). The review had two-fold objectives: (i) to appraise the project status and to identify key implementation issues; and (ii) to identify and agree with the Government of Nepal (GON) on future course of actions that are necessary for the satisfactory project implementation. This review was particularly important given that the last review had established significant deterioration of the project’s overall performance. The Team visited RSDP roadwork sites to summarily assess the roadwork quality and progress status of contracts’ implementation. 2. The Team would like to thank GON for the hospitality extended to it, especially by counterpart Public Disclosure Authorized agencies and officials (see Annex 1b for the list of persons met). This Aide Memoire summarizes the main review findings, agreements reached, and recommendations made Discussions held in the wrap up meeting (September 03, 2013) at the Ministry of Physical Infrastructures and Transport (MoPIT) and comments received on the draft are reflected in this version of the Aide Memoire. This Aide Memoire will be classified as a public document, as per the World Bank’s Access to Information policy and as per the decision of the wrap up meeting. II. Key Project Data 3. The following table provides the summary project data and the summary performance ratings: Project Data Project Performance Ratings Board Approval: 06-Dec-2007 Summary Ratings Last Now Effectiveness Date: 21-Feb-2008 Achievement of PDO MS MS ◄► Public Disclosure Authorized Closing Date: 30-Jun-2015 Implementation Progress MU MU ◄► Loan/Crdit Amount: $116.07m Project Management MU MU ▲ Amount Disbursed: $79.21m (68 %) Procurement MS MS ◄► Financial Management MU MU ◄► Safeguards MU MS ▲ M&E MS MS ◄► Counterpart Funding MU MS ▲ Notes: S- Satisfactory; MS – Moderately Satisfactory; MU - Moderately Unsatisfactory; U – Unsatisfactory;▲ Improving trends; ▼ Deteriorating trends; ◄► Static III. Achievement of Development Objectives Status 4. The progress made towards the achievement of the Project Development Objective (PDO) has been judged as “moderately satisfactory”. As reported earlier a social impact study was conducted in October, 2011. The study verified the two outcome indicators (linked to all weather access and travel time reduction) under original project scopes. The study results show that two outcome indicators Public Disclosure Authorized have surpassed targets. RSDP has also completed baseline studies for roads under additional financing (AF). The comprehensive achievements of these two PDO outcome indicators will be assessed once the socio-economic impact study is completed. RSDP plans to commence the study in February, 2014, at the end of the completion of the civil works, and to conclude the study by September, 2014. The most recent road condition survey (November, 2012) results show that the proportion of black-topped Strategic Road Network (SRN) roads that are in poor condition was 11.27% (against an end-project 1 Hereinafter referred as “The Team” target of 15%). The comparable figure from November, 2012 was 11.31%. This means that the condition of the network remains stable. The last review reported that the progress linked to the implementation of roadwork contracts and asset management had been unsatisfactory. The situation has not improved significantly between two reviews. This may influence the PDO indicators’ outcome adversely. Annex 2 provides the summary progress on the achievement of results. IV. Current Implementation Status Road Development Component 5. The progress of road development component continues to be “moderately unsatisfactory”. There has not been any significant progress in the contractors’ performance. However, recently RSDP has become more involved in the contractors’ performance monitoring. 6. Upgrading Works Sub-Component: RSDP’s target is to upgrade 700km of earthen tracks to all- season low-cost motorable road standards. Eight remote district headquarters2 in Mid and Far-Western regions of Nepal will get all-weather road connections once these roads are built. As of end-August, 2013 two district headquarters (Baitadi and Dailekh) are connected. So far RSDP upgraded 449km of roads (414km-Otta-seal, 5km-DBST surface, 30km-gravel surface; 299km-original project scopes plus 150km-under AF). Two contracts covering 30km roads (sections previously left as gravel surface due to slope stability problems) have been awarded for upgrading to Otta-seal standards. They are in the initial stage of implementation. 7. The progress of implementation of 23 on-going upgrading contracts ranges from 24% to 96%. Among them, three contracts (two contracts of Khodpe-Chainpur (KC) road and a contract of Chinchu-Jajarkot (CJ) road) are at the last stage of completion. The recent flood in the Mid and Far- West has affected two project roads significantly. The most affected road is the Gokuleshwor- Darchula (GD) road (contract 2B sections). The flood has left 9 cuts and a 900m washed-away section. Re-alignments are now necessary at various locations of this road. DOR has already started emergency road opening activities at these sections. Once these activities are completed RSDP plans to upgrade these sections to remaining upgraded road section standards. The Team advised RSDP to liaise closely with District Road Office (DRO), Baitadi on this in order to ensure that appropriate planning and engineering steps are followed in the opening of these sections. The World Bank policy also requires due-diligence in such a case, as these sections will be a part of a World Bank funded road. In the case of other roads (including KC road) the additional activities linked to the restoration of flood damaged sections will be accommodated within existing contracts. It was agreed that RSDP will provide the Bank with a full report on the flood damages by end-September, 2013 and complete the redesign works by November, 2013. 8. The Team has noted significant slow progress in 14 contracts. The affected roads are: Sitalpati- Musikot (SM) road 4 contracts, Khidkijula-Manma-Jumla (KMJ) road 8 contracts and CJ road 2 contracts. The physical progress of 10 RSDP upgrading contracts is below 35%, against 86% of the time elapsed. Contactors already missed milestones in many cases. However, RSDP has started close monitoring of these contracts recently. The project has issued warning letters to non-performing contracts. In some cases, three warning letters have been issued. RSDP has started fortnightly progress review of contracts, has been arranging one-to-one meetings with contractors, and applied liquidated damages to some contracts. In spite of all these initiatives, no significant progress (of non- performing and slow performing contracts) has been achieved. The Team expressed serious concerns about the performance of a number of contractors. RSDP had agreed to instruct the contractor’s to prepare and submit detail resource-based revised work schedule for all incomplete contracts. Subsequently the project will check, approve and monitor the revised contract completion schedules. RSDP will share these work schedules with the Bank before end-September, 2013. Even after taking these measures those contracts that do not show sign of significant improvements will be terminated. The Bank team will continue to assess the progress. The Bank may unilaterally cancel funding of those contracts that do not show adequate progress and the project fails to take appropriate actions against the contractors. 2 District headquarters are: Baitadi, Darchula, Bajhang, Dailekh, Kalikot, Jajarkot, Rukum and Jumla 2 9. RSDP has agreed to take immediate steps to restore the ferry service at Veri river crossing. The ferry cannot operate any more given that the recent flood damaged the tower and the ferry itself. It is to be noted that the performance of three CJ road contracts (5B, 5C and 5D) is dependent on the operation of the ferry service. The ferry provides the only transport link access to these contract sites. RSDP has also agreed to mobilize consultants’ design and supervision team immediately for the design and implementation of two newly awarded contracts (SKM 8A and TSD 8B). The quick finalization of the slope stability designs is important for the implementation of these contracts. 10. Field visits have identified a number of issues. The Team recommends the following to address them: (i) pro-active monitoring of contracts progress to expedite contract implementation; (ii) due diligence checks and controls applied in quarry operations and managing spoil disposal; (iii) ensuring all-time use of safety gears by workers and supervision staff at sites and the safety of pedestrians and vehicles on under-construction roads; (iv) completion of bio-engineering works including small scale structures and slope drain works within the remaining wet period; (v) completion of the assessment of flood damages and finalization of contract variations; (vi) making the codes available to the field laboratories and ensuring appropriate setting up of mini laboratories; (vii) improvement of gabion works qualities (including the use of binding wire, production of sample gabion boxes and training of workers). These were discussed and agreed with RSDP. While Annex 3 provides details of the sub- component progress, Annex 11 provides the field visit findings. 11. Periodic Maintenance Road works: RSDP target is to undertake periodic maintenance (PM) of 2,550 km of black-topped strategic roads. So far, the project completed approximately 1,323 km (original financing: 436 km and AF: 887 km). The Team noted with concerns that six PM contracts (constitute 148 km sections) procured over two years ago (in FY2010/11) are yet to be completed. Progress of these contracts ranges from 10% to 80%.
Recommended publications
  • Terms of References for Preparation of the Detailed Project Proposal For
    Terms of References for Preparation of the Detailed Project Proposal for the implementation of intensive value chain development program of vegetable and fruits in the 13 selected North-South road corridor of Nepal 1. Background Agriculture is the major contributing sector in national economy and this is possible by increasing production and productivity of crops, vegetables and fruits. Increasing agriculture productivity is also necessary for enhancing food security and is possible only when we can develop the value chain of fruits and vegetables. Therefore, it is utmost necessary to develop value chain of fruits and vegetables to increase market potentiality and comparative advantage. Government of Nepal has given priority for the value chain development in agriculture through the budget speech and it was clearly mentioned in the agriculture sector transformation guideline 2075 implementation action plan issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock development. With the increasing commercialization of agricultural, especially fruits and vegetables has been given high priority by many development agencies including government, non-government, private and donor agencies. Various agencies are promoting fruits and vegetable value chain in the various road corridor of the Nepal. But a consolidated and comprehensive project proposal has not been prepared so far for the implementation of intensive value chain development program of fruits and vegetables in the potential north-south road corridor in Nepal. Keeping in this in view and according to the approved annual program of Center for Agricultural Infrastructure Development and Mechanization Promotion (CAIDMP) for the fiscal year 2075/76, it is targeted to prepare Detailed Project Proposal for the implementation of intensive value chain development program of vegetable and fruits in the 13 selected North-South road corridor of Nepal Accordingly, it is also planned to prepare detail project proposal through consultancy service according to the related acts and rules of Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.3 Nepal Road Network
    2.3 Nepal Road Network Overview Primary Roads in Nepal Major Road Construction Projects Distance Matrix Road Security Weighbridges and Axle Load Limits Road Class and Surface Conditions Province 1 Province 2 Bagmati Province Gandaki Province Province 5 Karnali Province Sudurpashchim Province Overview Roads are the predominant mode of transport in Nepal. Road network of Nepal is categorized into the strategic road network (SRN), which comprises of highways and feeder roads, and the local road network (LRN), comprising of district roads and Urban roads. Nepal’s road network consists of about 64,500 km of roads. Of these, about 13,500 km belong to the SRN, the core network of national highways and feeder roads connecting district headquarters. (Picture : Nepal Road Standard 2070) The network density is low, at 14 kms per 100 km2 and 0.9 km per 1,000 people. 60% of the road network is concentrated in the lowland (Terai) areas. A Department of Roads (DoR’s) survey shows that 50% of the population of the hill areas still must walk two hours to reach an SRN road. Two of the 77 district headquarters, namely Humla, and Dolpa are yet to be connected to the SRN. Page 1 (Source: Sector Assessment [Summary]: Road Transport) Primary Roads in Nepal S. Rd. Name of Highway Length Node Feature Remarks N. Ref. (km) No. Start Point End Point 1 H01 Mahendra Highway 1027.67 Mechi Bridge, Jhapa Gadda chowki Border, East to West of Country Border Kanchanpur 2 H02 Tribhuvan Highway 159.66 Tribhuvan Statue, Sirsiya Bridge, Birgunj Connects biggest Customs to Capital Tripureshwor Border 3 H03 Arniko Highway 112.83 Maitighar Junction, KTM Friendship Bridge, Connects Chinese border to Capital Kodari Border 4 H04 Prithvi Highway 173.43 Naubise (TRP) Prithvi Chowk, Pokhara Connects Province 3 to Province 4 5 H05 Narayanghat - Mugling 36.16 Pulchowk, Naryanghat Mugling Naryanghat to Mugling Highway (PRM) 6 H06 Dhulikhel Sindhuli 198 Bhittamod border, Dhulikhel (ARM) 135.94 Km.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Roads
    His Majesty’s Government of Nepal Ministry of Works and Transport Department of Roads Nov ‘99 Number 12 HMIS News Highway Management Information System, Planning Branch, DOR Traffic Database New Director General in DoR Maintenance and Rehabilitation Coordination Unit (MRCU) Mr. Ananda Prasad Khanal took charge as the Director General st has developed a database application for storing and processing of Department of Roads on 1 November 1999. Before that he traffic data obtained from Automatic Logger and Manual traffic was working as Deputy Director General, Planning Branch. count conducted every year by the Planning Branch. This database is useful in maintaining the data systematically. It Mr. Ananda Prasad Khanal did the Bachelor in Civil eliminates the tradition of keeping data in spreadsheet instead Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology (I.I.T) of in Access. This database is not the substitute of the software Bombay in 1968. He joined the Department of Roads in 1968 dROAD6 installed in the Highway Management Information and has been working since then. He had worked as assistant System (HMIS). engineer, divisional engineer, zonal engineer, Regional director, Project director of ADB Project Directorate Office The design of this database uses Microsoft Access 97 software and DDG of Planning Branch. He has visited several countries and incorporates Access 2000. Minimum hardware and has vast and diverse experience in the field of road requirements are a Pentium processor, 16Mb of Ram (32 MB construction, maintenance and planning. Preferred), and 1.5 MB of spare storage capacity. The database can be accessed through a straightforward menu system that is All the staffs of DoR congratulate him in his new appointment displayed in the following format.
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination NEPAL: Electricity Grid
    Initial Environmental Examination Document Stage: Final Project Number: 54107-001 October 2020 NEPAL: Electricity Grid Modernization Project Part 1 Prepared by Nepal Electricity Authority, Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 12 August 2020) Currency Unit = Nepali Rupee/s (Rs) Rs1.00 = $0.008344 $1.00 = Rs119.8400 ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AIS air insulated substation CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CE common era CO2 carbon dioxide COD chemical oxygen demand DHM Department of Hydrology and Meteorology DO dissolved oxygen EGMP electricity grid modernization project EHS environment, health, and safety EIA environmental impact assessment EMF electromagnetic field EMP environmental management plan EPI environmental performance index GIS gas insulated substation GRM grievance redress mechanism HDI human development index IEE initial environmental examination IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineer Inc. ICNRP International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature kV kilovolt LPG liquefied petroleum gas masl meters above sea level mm millimeter µg/m³ micro gram per cubic meter NEA Nepal Electricity Authority PM2.5 fine particulate matter below 2.5 micrometers PMD project management directorate PTDEEP Power Transmission and Distribution Efficiency Enhancement Project Power Transmission and Distribution System Strengthening PTDSSP Project ROW right of way SASEC South Asia Sub-regional Economic Cooperation SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SNNP Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park SPCC spill prevention control and countermeasures UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization WEIGHTS AND MEASURES amp – ampere ha – hectare Hz – hertz km – kilometer (1,000 meters) kV – kilovolt (1,000 volts) kW – kilowatt (1,000 watts) mG – milligauss NOTES In this report, "$" refers to US dollars unless otherwise stated.
    [Show full text]
  • Income and Expenditure
    PUBLIC STATEMENT on INCOME AND EXPENDITURE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 His Majesty's Government Ministry of Finance 2002 1 (Unofficial Translation) Income and Expenditure Statement 2002/2003 Delivered by: Sher Bahadur Deuba Prime Minister and Finance Minister 8 July 2002 His Majesty's Government Ministry of Finance Bagdurbar, Kathmandu 2002 www.mof-facd.gov.np 2 My Fellow Sisters and Brothers, 1. The nation today is suffering from the violence and killings perpetrated by the terrorists. Almost all the sections of the society have faced terrible blows from this menace. In the meantime, His Majesty's Government (HMG) was compelled to dissolve the House of Representatives and seek fresh mandate from the people as HMG was obstructed in its responsibility of protecting the lives and property of the people and strengthening the security of Nepal. His Majesty The King has already issued ordinances containing, among others, the expenditure estimates compulsorily required for the FY 2002/03 as the House of Representatives is no longer in existence. I have taken this opportunity to make public the major contents and the underlying principles characterizing the ordinances issued by His Majesty The King. I feel pleased and honored for the happy coincidence of making this public statement on the auspicious occasion of His Majesty's Birthday Celebrations. 2. On this occasion of presenting the income and expenditure statement pertaining to FY 2002/03, I would, first of all, like to offer tributes to the known and unknown martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the democracy. I submit offerings to all those martyred while fighting the terrorists: personnel of the Royal Nepal Army, Nepal Civil Police and Armed Police as well as all the common citizens, activists of the political parties, civil servants, teachers and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Speech of Fiscal Year 2008-09
    Budget Speech of Fiscal Year 2008-09 Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance 2008 (Unofficial Translation) Budget Speech of Fiscal Year 2 0 0 8 - 0 9 Delivered to Legislature-Parliament by Finance Minister Dr. Babu Ram Bhattarai on 19 September 2 0 0 8 Government of Nepal Ministry of Finance 2008 Website: http//www.mof.gov.np Right Honorable Speaker, 1. Nepal has made a historic new turn. The end of the era of feudal monarchy has been matched with the beginning of that of federal democratic republic in the country. It is a rare opportunity to be able to witness and experience such a distinct occasion gifted by the change of history which comes only once in a lifetime of the generations of the people. Our generation has been privileged with that glorious opportunity and we all should take pride in that. This epoch-making change has been possible only through the ceaseless struggle, uprising, peoples' war and the people's movement which continued for the last six decades illustrated with a series of people's sacrifices and sufferings. In this context, as a Finance Minister of the national coalition government formed by the nation's first-ever elected Constituent Assembly, I feel immensely delighted for presenting the first budget of the Federal Democratic Republic Nepal in this august Assembly. On this happy occasion, I heartily felicitate all the sovereign Nepali sisters and brothers living in the country and abroad. I also remember with full respect and honor all those known and unknown martyrs who sacrificed their invaluable lives in order for us to celebrate this historic achievement, and offer my deep-down tribute to them.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Development Assistance and Connectivity Projects in Nepal
    India’s Development Assistance and Connectivity Projects in Nepal AUTHORS: SANJAY PULIPAKA, AKSHAYA SREE N R, M HARSHINI, DEEPALAKSHMI V R, KRISHI KORRAPATI 1 Disclaimer Opinions and recommendations in the report are exclusive of the author(s) and not of any other individual or institution including ICRIER. This report has been prepared in good faith on the basis of information available at the date of publication. All interactions and transactions with sponsors and their representatives have been transparent and conducted in an open, honest and independent manner as enshrined in ICRIER Memorandum of Association. ICRIER does not accept any corporate funding that comes with a mandated research area which is not in line with ICRIER’s research agenda. The corporate funding of an ICRIER activity does not, in any way, imply ICRIER’s endorsement of the views of the sponsoring organization or its products or policies. ICRIER does not conduct research that is focused on any specific product or service provided by the corporate sponsor. Submitted by: ICRIER Dated: May 20, 2018 Authors: Sanjay Pulipaka, Akshaya Sree N R, M Harshini, Deepalakshmi V R, Krishi Korrapati Image Details: Jomsom Bridge (Mustang District, Nepal) constructed with Indian assistance in 2017. Image Source: Indian Embassy, Kathmandu, Nepal. India’s Development Assistance and Connectivity Projects in Nepal 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgement 4 List of Abbreviations 5 1. SECTION ONE 7 Introduction 7 2. SECTION TWO 8 A Unique Relationship 8 3. SECTION THREE 11 Connectivity Projects 11 4. SECTION FOUR 24 Small Development Projects and Connectivity 24 5. SECTION FIVE 26 Trade and Transit 26 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Speech of the Fiscal Year 2000/2001
    Budget Speech of the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Delivered by: Mahesh Acharya Finance Minister To the Eighteenth Session of the Parliament 30 May, 2000 His Majesty’s Government Ministry of Finance Right Honorable Speaker, 1. As I have stood here to present the budget of the fiscal year 2000/2001, I am happy to note that this budget is being presented to this august House at the mark of the first decennial of the government elected by the people. This is the budget of the Golden Jubilee year since His Majesty's Government started to present the budget as a part of its legal duty. This budget is also has the mark of being the first budget for our country in the new millennium. With this note, Honorable Speaker, I consider this day as the day of historical importance indeed. At this opportunity, I would like to pay my humble tribute, to all the sisters and brothers of my country and recalling my memory of all the martyrs of great fame who sacrificed their lives for the great cause of the country and democracy, I pay my due respect and homage to all of them. 2. The decade that has passed after the restoration of democracy has left with profs of mixed results for the Nepalese people. In these ten years, the democracy coupled with the organized force and awareness of the people has prevailed down to the rural societies. People have been able to raise their voice through their organized strength and awareness for development and social justice in their favor and take their stand for the development policies and plans that foster their interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation Review and Support Mission September 1-22, 2016 AIDE-MEMOIRE I
    ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Additional Financing (IDA Credit No. 5002-NP) Implementation Review and Support Mission September 1-22, 2016 AIDE-MEMOIRE I. Introduction and Acknowledgment 1. A World Bank review team1 (see Annex-1a provides the team members’ list) led by Farhad Ahmed carried out an implementation review from September 1-22, 2016 on the Road Sector Development Project (RSDP). The review had following objectives: (i) assessing the project status and identify the key implementation issues, especially identify measures required to conclude few remaining activities; (ii) identifying and agreeing with the Government of Nepal (GON) on the future course of actions that will be necessary for achieving satisfactory results as envisaged in this project; (iii) assessing the readiness of the activities that will be undertaken under the forthcoming second additional financing of the project; and (iv) discussing and agreeing on the various activities linked to the preparation of an Implementation Completion and Results Report (ICR) of the Project. 2. The Team would like to thank GON for the hospitality extended to it, especially by counterpart agencies and officials (Annex-1b provides the list of persons met). This Aide-Memoire (AM) summarizes main review findings, agreements reached, and recommendations made. It also reflects discussions held in a wrap-up meeting chaired by Mr. Dhana Bahadur Tamang, Secretary, Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport (MoPIT) on September 22, 2016. The Team has debriefed the Ministry of Finance on review findings on September 10, 2016. As per the Bank's Access to Information policy and the wrap-up meeting decision, this AM will be classified as a public document.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistices of Strategic Road
    Table 9 LIST OF IMPORTANT SRN AND STATUS Road S.N. Road Sectors Total Length (km) Date of Start Date of Completion Cooperation Rehabilitation/Upgrading/Remarks Class 1 H01 MAHENDRA RAJMARGA 1027.67 Road Sections Status 1.1 Kakarbhitta-Dhalkebar 258.21 1967 1974 India Kakarbhitta-Belbari Third Highway/ODA, 1998 1.2 Dhalkebar-Pathlaiya 109.00 1967 1972 USSR Belbari-Chaurahawa ADB/RNDP-2005 1.3 Pathlaiya-Hetauda 29.07 1973 1982 USA Chaurahawa-Pathlaiya SRIP/ADB, 1996 1.3 Hetauda-Narayangadh 77.00 1973 1982 USA Pathlaiya-Hetauda SRIP/ADB, 1997 1.4 Narayangadh-Butwal 114.00 1969 1972 UK Hetauda-Narayanghat RNDP PBMC 2005 1.5 Butwal-Kohalpur 237.00 1973 1985 India Narayanghat-Butwal UK, 1995 1.6 Kohalpur-Banbasa 203.39 1973 1978 India Butwal-Kohalpur PM, SRIP, 1995 Kohalpur-Banbasa ADB/RNDP PBMC 2005 2 H02 TRIBHUVAN RAJPATH 159.66 2.1 Sirsiya Boarder-Pathlaiya 57.0 (28.0) 1958 1967 USA Raxual-Pathlaiya SRIP/ADB, 1997 2.3 Hetauda-Bhainse 10.00 1958 1962 USA Bhainse-Naubise RMRP/IDA, 1997, GTZ, 1996 2.4 Bhainse-Naubise 97.00 1953 1956 India Naubise-Nagdhunga RMRP/IDA, 1997, GTZ, 1996 2.5 Naubise-Nagdhunga 17.00 1953 1956 India Nagdhunga-Kalanki HMG/DOR, 1996 2.6 Nagdhunga-Tripureswor 12.57 Kalanki-Tripureswor SRIP/ADB 1997 3 H03 ARNIKO RAJMARGA 113.00 1963 1972 China Maitighar-Suryabinayak SRIP, Party overlay/PM, 1995 Suryabinayak-Dhulikhel AHMP, SDC, 2001 Dhulikhel-Dolalghat AHMP, SDC, 1995 Dolalghat-Barabise AHMP, SDC, 1998 Barabise-Kodari HMG/DOR 4 H04 PRITHIVI RAJMARGA 174.00 1967 1974 China Naubise- Mugling IDA, ODA, 1995 Mugling-Pokhara
    [Show full text]
  • Initial Environmental Examination NEPAL: Electricity Grid
    Initial Environmental Examination Document Stage: Final Project Number: 54107-001 August 2020 NEPAL: Electricity Grid Modernization Project Part 2 Prepared by Nepal Electricity Authority, Government of Nepal for the Asian Development Bank. This Initial Environmental Examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. 311 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Recommendation letter from line agencies 313 Appendix 2 - National ambient air, water, noise, and emission standards 317 Appendix 3 - Environmental audit report of existing facilities with CAP 322 Appendix 4 - Due diligence of associated facilities 376 Appendix 5 - Alternative analysis summary 433 Appendix 6 - Water resources capacity details 439 Appendix 7 - Critical habitat assessment 454 Appendix 8 - Guidelines on COVID-19 preparedness measures 505 Appendix 9 - Public consultation details 509 Appendix 10 - EMP mitigation monitoring plans 570 Appendix 11 - Environmental monitoring report template 660 Appendix 12 – Forest tables 663 312 Appendix 1: Recommendation Letters from Line Agencies Appendix 1a: IEE Approval Letter for Dandakhet-Rahughat 132kV Transmission Line 313 314 Translation This Letter Dated October 3, 2019 with the subject related to acceptance of IEE by Department of Electricity Development.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    ROAD SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (IDA Credit Nos. 4832-NP, 5002-NP and IDA Grant Nos. H-339-NP, H-629-NP) Implementation Review and Support Mission: July 29-August 06, 2015 AIDE-MEMOIRE Public Disclosure Authorized I. Introduction and Acknowledgment 1. A World Bank review team1 (see Annex 1a provides the team members’ list) carried out an implementation review from July 29 - August 06, 2015 on the Road Sector Development Project (RSDP). The review had following objectives: (i) review and assess the project status and identify the key implementation issues; (ii) identify and agree with the Government of Nepal (GON) on the future course of actions that will be necessary for achieving satisfactory results as envisaged in this project; and (iii) identify actions for the planning and preparation of the potential Additional Financing (AF). The Team visited RSDP roadwork sites in order to summarily assess the roadwork quality and contract implementation progress status. 2. The Team would like to thank GON for the hospitality extended to it, especially by counterpart agencies and officials (Annex 1b provides the list of persons met). This Aide-Memoire (AM) summarizes main review findings, agreements reached, and recommendations made. It also reflects Public Disclosure Authorized discussions held in a wrap-up meeting chaired by Mr. Devendra Karki, Officiating Secretary, Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport (MoPIT) on August 13, 2015. As per the Bank's Access to Information policy and the wrap-up meeting decision, this Aide-Memoire
    [Show full text]