Fax Coversheet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fax Coversheet 2 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 O.V.S.A.C. Study No.8 JAN-MAR 2004 ................................................................................................................................ 3 Heavy Guns of the Royal Navy ........................................................................................................................... 13 4.7-in Naval QF on “Scott” Carriage ........................................................................................................ 13 6-in QF on Rail Carriage ...................................................................................................................................... 19 O.V.S.A.C. Study No.17 Jul-Sep 2006 .......................................................................................................... 23 A 3-pr Hotchkiss QF on a recoil-controlled embrasure mount. Note the yoke and pistol grip trigger. ...................................................................................................................................... 30 6-pr Hotchkiss QF .......................................................................................................................................................... 34 4.7-inch Naval QF Mark I to IV ...................................................................................................................... 38 O.V.S.A.C. Study No. 22 Oct-Dec 2007 .............................................................................................................................. 46 The breech mechanism of a Hotchkiss QF gun. Note the pistol grip trigger and actuation crank. ................................................................................................................................................. 52 6-pr Hotchkiss QF .......................................................................................................................................................... 57 INTRODUCTION Thank you very much MC Heunis that we could include your three Study Reports on Armoured Trains during the Anglo Boer War in this final edition of our Nongqai- trilogy on War-, Ambulance-, Hospital-, Railways Police-, SA Constabulary-, Military- and SAPS-trains. Your contribution has enhanced our knowledge on this most interesting subject – Hennie Heymans. 3 ORANJE VRIJSTAAT ART ILLERIE CORPS HISTORICAL STUDY AND RE- ENACTMENT GROUP O.V.S.A.C. STUDY NO.8 JAN-MAR 2004 MONSTER GUNS OF THE ANGLO-BOER WAR Introduction Shortly after the outbreak of the Anglo-Boer War British forces in South Africa realised they were fighting an enemy with better and heavier guns than their own. As it would be several weeks before the heavy ordnance of the Royal Garrison Artillery “Siege Train” could arrive from England, drastic measures had to be taken to get heavy guns into the field. This precarious position, combined with the threat that the four forts around Pretoria posed, gave rise to the appearance of some of the heaviest artillery pieces that the Southern Hemisphere ever saw. The Pretoria Forts and Their Armament The internally (Uitlander) supported Jameson Raid at the start of 1896 brought the Transvaal Government to the shocking realisation that Pretoria, the seat of their government, was extremely vulnerable to invasion and that its defenders were inadequately armed. This led to numerous counter measures being taken, the most important of these, the decision in March 1896 to shut the capital off with a ring of forts. By the time war broke out in October 1899 this plan was only partially realised with four forts, Fort Klapperkop, Fort Schanskop, Fort Wonderboom and Fort Daspoortrand completed to defend the main approaches to the city. Two ammunition magazines at Pretoria, the Groen Magazijn and the Centrale Magazijn (complete with a parapet and garrison) as well as a fort at Johannesburg, were The inside of Fort Schanskop shortly before its completion. also completed. Contemporary European fortification principles dictated the design and construction of the forts. Of the four, three were built according to the designs of German engineers and representatives from Krupp, while Fort Daspoortrand was P . O . B O X 2 6 7 7 1 , LANGENHOVENPARK , 9 3 3 0 , SOUTH AFRICA [email protected] WWW.HEILBRONCOMMAN DO.COM 4 built according to a design by French engineers, representatives of Schneider & Co. One German military observer of the time was quoted to have said that he travelled all the way to South Africa to see forts that he could have seen in Germany. To close the gaps between the strongholds, the forts were to be supplied with long range garrison artillery. Major PE Erasmus, of the Staatsartillerie, proposed that each of the larger forts should have three heavy guns. One would resist frontal attacks, while two more were to be mounted on the sides of the fort to cover the flanks, to deliver enfilade fire in support of neighbouring forts and to support fire in front of the fort. To counter close-in attacks two lighter guns were also proposed for each fort. By the time Major Erasmus made this recommendation, six 75mm QF and four 155mm BL guns, later known as the “Long Toms”, were already on order from Schneider & Co. In the same month (April 1897) that this order was landed at Lourenço Marques (Mozambique), the plans were changed and it was decided that each fort should have two 155mm guns, two 75mm guns and two 37mm Maxims. This proposal was approved and on 14 May 1897 six more 155mm guns and ten 75mm guns were ordered. Delivery of this order was prevented by the outbreak A drawing signed by Major Erasmus and dated 15 April 1899 of war. showing one of the fort armament plans. In the end the forts did not play their intended role during the war, but they posed enough of a threat to the British to force them to drag extremely cumbersome siege artillery over many miles to Pretoria, thereby congesting their lines of supply and delaying their advance. To the Front The Transvaal’s acquisition of large calibre guns was no particular secret. Newspapers reported on it and therefore the general public and the British secret service agents in South Africa knew about it. However, for some reason the British were under the impression that the four 155mm pieces were guns of position and that they would be permanently installed in the forts. When the long-awaited war came, the Corps Vesting Artillerie (Fortress Artillery Corps) took these heavy-weights with them to the front and soon the British were greatly surprised by the Boer "secret" heavy guns firing at them at ranges far superior to their own artillery and from positions thought to be inaccessible to heavy ordnance. The Long Toms were not the only heavy guns in Boer hands as four 120mm Krupp QF howitzers also arrived before the outbreak of hostilities and later proved to be one of the best guns of the war. In summary, at the outbreak of war, the Transvaal had the following heavy ordnance: • 4-off 120mm Krupp QF howitzers 5 • 4-off 155mm Schneider (Creusot) BL siege guns • 1-off 6.3-in RML howitzer • 1-off 8-in SBML mortar Except for the two obsolete muzzle loading pieces, the Boer heavy guns became both feared and famous during the conflict. The Long Tom in particular became legendary with many a story (and a couple of fables) remaining to this day. Outranged by Boer artillery in the opening stages of the war, British artillery in the field was at a distinct disadvantage. In reply to the Long Tom and 120mm Krupp the Royal Artillery could only answer with regular field guns, the 5-in BL howitzer and two antique 6.3-in RML howitzers: • 18-off 5-in BL howitzer on Mk II carriages • 2-off 6.3-in RML howitzer on 40-pr RML carriages Captain Scott Saves the Empire Originally it was thought that Britain’s heavier artillery would only be needed for the “final” attack on the Pretoria forts and no allowance was made for heavy guns in the field. When it was finally discovered that the Boers had sent their fortress guns to the front and that they could easily out-gun anything the British army could throw at them, drastic measures had to be taken. The heavier guns of the Siege Train would provide an answer to the Boer guns, but they were not due to arrive in South Africa until early 1900. To fill the gap, the land forces turned to the Royal Navy (RN) who came to their rescue in the form of Captain Percy Scott of the HMS TERRIBLE. Scott was the RN’s foremost gunnery expert and his innovative approach to solve the problem proved that he was blessed with The HMS TERRIBLE. After landing most of her guns and crew she initiative too. was paralysed and had to be tied up in harbour. The TERRIBLE and her sister vessels carried a selection of naval guns which were quickly removed and mounted onto sturdy carriages of wood and metal which had been hastily designed and built. The first guns arrived in Ladysmith hours before it was encircled, while the remainder made their way to relieving forces on the Natal, Southern and Western Front. Due to their weight the guns had to be drawn by oxen giving rise to the name “cow guns”. Manned by their naval crews, the sailors of the Naval Brigades and their large guns were an unusual sight hundreds of miles away from the nearest ocean. The larger naval guns deployed ashore were: • 19-off 4.7-in QF guns on improvised carriages • 1-off 6-in QF gun on an improvised carriage
Recommended publications
  • Arms and Machine Guns from the Year 1863 up to the Present Day
    Royal United Services Institution. Journal ISSN: 0035-9289 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rusi19 Personal Reminiscences of the Evolution of Small- Arms and Machine Guns from the Year 1863 up to the Present Day Lieut.-Colonel W. N. Lockyer Chief Inspector of Small-Arms R.A. To cite this article: Lieut.-Colonel W. N. Lockyer Chief Inspector of Small-Arms R.A. (1898) Personal Reminiscences of the Evolution of Small-Arms and Machine Guns from the Year 1863 up to the Present Day, Royal United Services Institution. Journal, 42:248, 1121-1151, DOI: 10.1080/03071849809417413 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03071849809417413 Published online: 11 Sep 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 6 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rusi20 Download by: [The University Of Melbourne Libraries] Date: 17 June 2016, At: 12:25 VOL. XLII. [Aiithors aZotie are responsi6Ze for fhe contenfs of fheir respectizfe PGpers.3 PERSONAL REMINISCENCES OF THE EVOLU- TION OF SAIALL-ARkIS AND RIACHINE GUNS FROhI. .THE YEAR lSG3 UP 'I'O THE PRESENT DAY. By Lictrt.-CoZonrl ll! AT. LOCKYER, R.A., Chief Irrsprctorof SnioZZ-Arm. Wednesday, June 20th, ISDS. Rear-Admiral the Rt. Ron. Lord CHARLESBEIZESFOKD, C.B., N.P., in the Chair. I.-RIFLES, ETC. I MAKE the year 18G3 the starting point for two reasons :- 1. Because it was just the close of the muzzle-loading pcriod. 2. Because it was in that year that I became personally acquainted with the Service rifle, since which time I have continually kept up my acquaintancewith thcService small-arms, making all kinds of experirncnts; and for the last sixteen years my duty has been to inspect and tcst the various arms during their mannractnre, after they are finished before issue, and again when in use in the hands of the troops.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Exhibits at IWM Duxford
    List of exhibits at IWM Duxford Aircraft Airco/de Havilland DH9 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (Ex; Spectrum Leisure Airspeed Ambassador 2 (EX; DAS) Ltd/Classic Wings) Airspeed AS40 Oxford Mk 1 (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 82A Tiger Moth (AS; IWM) Avro 683 Lancaster Mk X (AS; IWM) de Havilland DH 100 Vampire TII (BoB; IWM) Avro 698 Vulcan B2 (AS; IWM) Douglas Dakota C-47A (AAM; IWM) Avro Anson Mk 1 (AS; IWM) English Electric Canberra B2 (AS; IWM) Avro Canada CF-100 Mk 4B (AS; IWM) English Electric Lightning Mk I (AS; IWM) Avro Shackleton Mk 3 (EX; IWM) Fairchild A-10A Thunderbolt II ‘Warthog’ (AAM; USAF) Avro York C1 (AS; DAS) Fairchild Bolingbroke IVT (Bristol Blenheim) (A&S; Propshop BAC 167 Strikemaster Mk 80A (CiA; IWM) Ltd/ARC) BAC TSR-2 (AS; IWM) Fairey Firefly Mk I (FA; ARC) BAe Harrier GR3 (AS; IWM) Fairey Gannet ECM6 (AS4) (A&S; IWM) Beech D17S Staggerwing (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Fairey Swordfish Mk III (AS; IWM) Bell UH-1H (AAM; IWM) FMA IA-58A Pucará (Pucara) (CiA; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress (CiA; IWM) Focke Achgelis Fa-330 (A&S; IWM) Boeing B-17G Fortress Sally B (FA) (Ex; B-17 Preservation General Dynamics F-111E (AAM; USAF Museum) Ltd)* General Dynamics F-111F (cockpit capsule) (AAM; IWM) Boeing B-29A Superfortress (AAM; United States Navy) Gloster Javelin FAW9 (BoB; IWM) Boeing B-52D Stratofortress (AAM; IWM) Gloster Meteor F8 (BoB; IWM) BoeingStearman PT-17 Kaydet (AAM; IWM) Grumman F6F-5 Hellcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC) Branson/Lindstrand Balloon Capsule (Virgin Atlantic Flyer Grumman F8F-2P Bearcat (FA; Patina Ltd/TFC)
    [Show full text]
  • The Martini Henry 2
    The Journal of the Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association Volume 4, No. 8 ISSN: 0305-0440 © 2016 The Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association, BCM HBSA, London WC1N 3XX The cover picture A sketch of the action of the original type of Gehendra rifle made by John Walter during research for the book: “Guns of the Gurkhas”. Advice to authors he HBSA Journal is published annually and welcomes contributions on topics concerning Tbreechloading arms from the 18th century onwards, covering developments in smallarms technology, ammunition, sights and accoutrements. Short articles of a few hundred words can be published, and major works should not normally exceed 12,000 words. Manuscripts should be sent to the editor electronically, with text and illustrations separately. Permission should be obtained from any copyright holder of illustrations and such permission should be acknowledged in the article. References should be listed at the end of the article using the Havard referencing style: http://goo.gl/CBDmp. Articles are subject to peer-review and may be edited with the author’s agreement. Authors are requested to contact the editor ([email protected]) before submitting a manuscript. Layout and Artwork David Butterworth Tel 020 8816 8472, [email protected] www.davidbutterworth.co.uk Print Print Impressions Ltd. Unit 18, West Station Industrial Estate, Maldon, Essex CM9 6TW Tel 016 2192 8083 Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association Volume 4, Number 8 November 2016 Patron: Commander The Lord Cottesloe KStJ JP
    [Show full text]
  • Fuller Article
    A Global Forum for Naval Historical Scholarship International Journal of Naval History December 2005 Volume 4 Number 3 “A portentous spectacle”: The Monitor U.S.S. Miantonomoh Visits England Howard J. Fuller University of Wolverhampton United Kingdom [PICTURE 1/Oscar Parkes painting (Photo# NH 59544)] Can a single man-o’-war make a difference—in peacetime? Perhaps, if it is the right ship at the right place at the right time. A recent BBC series recreating the mid 18th- century Pacific voyages of Captain Cook, successfully demonstrated in this regard that H.M.S. Endeavour certainly made a difference; to the people who sent her around the world, to the people who saw her coming in off the horizon, billowing and bright, and to wider events and developments which those people could only imagine—and which historians ever since have sought to understand.[1] One might also mention the transpolar voyage of the U.S.S. Nautilus, nearly 200 years after Cook; not so much a mission of exploration and oceanography but a historic display of shipboard nuclear power and potential nevertheless; a 19th century dream, or nightmare, come true.[2] Indeed Jules Verne’s Captain Nemo was well aware that his own Nautilus could not just tip but completely topple the surface world’s ‘balance of power’ at sea, with predictable results. As the captive narrator of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea exclaimed: Of course, everyone now knew what the supposed monster had turned out to be….a submarine, far more dangerous than a monstrous whale. …Doubtless, everywhere at sea, this fearful engine of destruction was being pursued.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountain Scouting
    7' '' '**-^jiiiriBiiiiHiiiiiimii/iii 3HwMwi*w<fc i iW'i <i«*ww»wf wNm>iHWri i>i «a im»aw»«»E»a>t^>.vwftp aaa^WMOVtrttMiAiVv BOUGHT WITH THE INCO FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT THE GIFT OF MinrQ W. Sag* 1891 Cornell University Library Mountain scoutini 3 1924 030 724 201 olin The original of tliis book is in tine Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030724201 : Mountain Scouting A HAND-BOOK FOR Officers and Soldiers on the Frontiers. PROFUSELY ILLUSTRATED AND CONTAINING NUMEROUS NOTES ON THE ART OF TRA VEL, BY EDWARD S. FARROW, U. S. Army, ^<m«tont Inkruetor of Taeiics at the V. 8. Military Academy, and, For- merly Commemding Indian Bcvvtsin the Department of the Colvmbia. ' NEW YORK PTJBLI8HBD BY THE AUTHOR, 1881. Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year i38i, BY EDWARD S. FARROW, In the office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. \ Inscribed TO OLIVER OTIS HOWARD, Brigadier and Brevet Major Generate V. S. Army AS A TRIBUTE TO HIS UNEQUALED ENTERPRISE AND PATRONAGE OF THE ART OF WAR, FROM HIS AFFECTIONATE F.R]ENI> THE AUTHOR. PREFACE. The object of my book is to investigate that chain of many minor successes, each link of which must be perfect, in order to insure the success of any expedition. A long and dangerous journey, without the loss of properly, comfort, nealth or life, can only be accomplished after having learned how to prepare for all emergencies; how to avoid un- necessary hardships; and how to hnd out the capabilities of the country and of the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Artillery - EB 1911
    Artillery - EB 1911 Editor A.W.J Graham Kerr & picture editor C.H blackwood RESEARCH guide II. 2020 EncyclopÆdia BRITANNICA 1911 The Fortress Study Group is a registered charity (No.288790) founded in 1975. It is an international group whose aim is to advance the education of the public in all aspects of fortification and their armaments, especially works constructed to mount or resist artillery. Acknowledgements Each of these Research Guides come from a collection of Encyclopædia Britannica dated 1911, that I had inherited from my fathers library although somewhat out- dated today, the historical value is still of interest. They are a stand-alone booklets, available to members through the website for downloading. Hard copies are available at a cost for printing and postage and packing. We have been able to do this as a team and my thanks goes to Charles Blackwood who has edited the maps, diagrams and some photographs. A number of photo- graphs have been used from other sources all of which are copyrighted to their author. The editor apologises in advance for any mistakes or inadvertent breach of copyright, with thanks to Wikipedia, Wikisource and Google Earth, where we have used them. This publication ©AWJGK·FSG·2020 Contents ARTILLERY Historical Sketch page 3 Organization page 19 Tactical Work page 22 Bibliography page 38 References page 40 Other Research Guides page 42 Cover picture: Two 17th C siege cannon at Koenigstein Castle, Germany. CHB . 2 ARTILLERY Artillery, a term originally applied to all engines for discharging missiles, and in this sense used in English in the early 17th century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 MARCHISIO, GIULIO How to cite: MARCHISIO, GIULIO (2012) Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7323/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Battleships and Dividends: The Rise of Private Armaments Firms in Great Britain and Italy, c. 1860-1914 Giulio Marchisio This thesis analyses the rise of private armaments firms in Great Britain and in Italy from mid-19th century to the outbreak of the First World War, with a focus on naval armaments and military shipbuilding. During this period, the armaments industry underwent a radical transformation, moving from being based on public-owned arsenals and yards to being based on private firms – the system of military procurement prevalent today.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Relief Expedition Joint Coalition Warfare in China Summer 1900
    07-02574 China Relief Cover.indd 1 11/19/08 12:53:03 PM 07-02574 China Relief Cover.indd 2 11/19/08 12:53:04 PM The China Relief Expedition Joint Coalition Warfare in China Summer 1900 prepared by LTC(R) Robert R. Leonhard, Ph.D. The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory This essay reflects the views of the author alone and does not necessarily imply concurrence by The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL) or any other organization or agency, public or private. About the Author LTC(R) Robert R. Leonhard, Ph.D., is on the Principal Professional Staff of The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory and a member of the Strategic Assessments Office of the National Security Analysis Department. He retired from a 24-year career in the Army after serving as an infantry officer and war planner and is a veteran of Operation Desert Storm. Dr. Leonhard is the author of The Art of Maneuver: Maneuver-Warfare Theory and AirLand Battle (1991), Fighting by Minutes: Time and the Art of War (1994), The Principles of War for the Informa- tion Age (1998), and The Evolution of Strategy in the Global War on Terrorism (2005), as well as numerous articles and essays on national security issues. Foreign Concessions and Spheres of Influence China, 1900 Introduction The summer of 1900 saw the formation of a perfect storm of conflict over the northern provinces of China. Atop an anachronistic and arrogant national government sat an aged and devious woman—the Empress Dowager Tsu Hsi.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxim Silencer Company Photographs 2015.288
    Maxim Silencer Company photographs 2015.288 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Audiovisual Collections PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Maxim Silencer Company photographs 2015.288 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Note ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Maxim Silencer Company photographs 2015.288 Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • The Gommunigator
    THE GOMMUNIGATOR CRO\MN LIFE INSURANCE CO lncorporated in Canada with Limited Liability (Ministry o{ Defence Accredited Company) * POLICIES IN FORCE EXCEED SIX BILLIONS _ The Royal Navy offers the young man a wonderful, secure and exciting career. Whilst serving in the Navy it is very probable that you will become married, raise a fafu[y glFplan to buy your own home. Crown Life offers the young man security when serving in tl$ s6ivice and also when becoming a civilian. Your Crown Life Underwriter has been trained to a high degree in programming to help you build your future security. Before owning Li{e lnsurance, it is necessary to thoroughly understand the importance attached to it. As a client, your representative will always be available to service your other needs; such as house purchase methods, both normal and the Naval Loan Scheme (applicable to ratings on pensionable engagements), The advantages of Building Society lnvestments, etc. Young men have many questions that need to be answered. Most of these cannot be covered adequately by brochures which give only the basic facts. To be fully conversant will take time. Crown Li{e makes time and therefore by arranging a personal appointment our representative will call on you, without obligation, to discuss your future, which to Crown Life is of paramount i m po rtan ce. To arrange a suitable appointment please write or call:Mr. M. J. Boon, Crown Life Insurance Company,220 Devonshire Avenue, Southsea, Portsmouth, Hants, P04 9EH. Telephone Portsmouth 31031 . Giving the following details:- Name...,...... Add ress Rank or Ratin9..........
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Naval Gunfire Support at Gallipoli David Stevens Amphibious
    Naval Gunfire Support at Gallipoli David Stevens Amphibious operations are among the most complex of military endeavours, calling for well defined command responsibilities and close collaboration between the services. In the lead up to an assault, naval forces are expected to provide sea control and deliver the land forces safely to their objective in a combat ready state. The special naval tasks after a landing are to provide direct tactical support to land forces until they break out from the beachhead and shape conditions to ensure that the flow of supplies and reinforcements exceeds that of the enemy. At Gallipoli, the most immediate naval support came through the provision of fire from the sea, and this contribution’s effectiveness has since been the subject of considerable adverse comment. As early as 9 May 1915, Lord Kitchener, who before the assault had envisioned the Turks swept away by the navy’s guns, was expressing his disappointment regarding the actual effect produced.1 At the same time, the naval commander, Vice Admiral John de Robeck, was noting that, ‘…when it is a question of trenches and machine guns the Navy is of small assistance, it is these later that have checked the Army.’2 Australia’s official historian, Charles Bean, was unequivocal, writing that naval gunfire was useless on the peninsula; the ships being unable to ‘fire over impossible angles at undiscoverable targets’.3 Gallipoli’s topography was undoubtedly troublesome. Naval fire control equipment and heavy guns were optimised for use against other ships, with battleship turrets allowing a maximum elevation of just 20 degrees.
    [Show full text]