Network of European/Asian Rail Research Capacities (Signalling Systems)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Network of European/Asian Rail Research Capacities (Signalling Systems) АВТОМАТИКА, ТЕЛЕМЕХАНІКА, ЗВ’ЯЗОК UDC 656.2 CHEPTSOV M.N.,Doctor of Engineering, Professor of Donetsk Railway Transports Institute, TSYKHMISTRO S.I.,Head of IT department of Donetsk Railway Transports Institute, BOINIK A.B. Doctor of Engineering, Professor of UkrainianStateAcademyofRailwayTransport, BAKHAL I.G., Postgraduate studentof Ukrainian State Academy of Railway Transport PROJECT NEAR² –NETWORK OF EUROPEAN/ASIAN RAIL RESEARCH CAPACITIES (SIGNALLING SYSTEMS) Introduction The European Union’s (EU) aspiration for railway systems that are interoperable across Europe is driven by the need to Railway signalling systems have to service a market that is open within and ensure the safe movement of freight and across industrial sectors and national passenger trains. Lately, their design and boundaries. This in turn requires that the operation has become increasingly complex. technologies and operational procedures that Therefore we will make the classification of underpin the railway systems facilitate not the European-Asian railway modern only interoperability but also enhancement of signalling systems (on stations, between safety, capacity and efficiency. The European stations), taking into account possibility of Railway Traffic Management System ensuring the safety for various speeds of (ERTMS/ETCS) is designed to enable movement. interoperability through use of one unique signalling system as opposed to conventional Signalling systems in European railways signalling systems [1]. Table 1 ETCS levels and functionality. ETCS Train detection Driver Description level notification 0 ETCS fitted train travelling on unfitted infrastructure 1 Balise at signal Signal and driver Communication via balise - no data radio or balise at machine interface communication. Line-side signals retained. signal with Line-side Equipment Unit Train position is infill determined trackside. No radio block centre. 2 GSM-R Signal and driver Communication via GSM-R radio. machine interface No requirement for line-side signals/line-side equipment unit or track detection device Train position is determined trackside. 3 GSM-R Driver machine Communication via GSM-R radio. interface No line-side signals. Train position determined onboard. The expected status deployment of ERTMS on European railways presented on Fig.1. Збірник наукових праць ДонІЗТ. 2013 № 36 106 АВТОМАТИКА, ТЕЛЕМЕХАНІКА, ЗВ’ЯЗОК Figure 1. ERTMS deployment throughout Europe [1] Chinese Train Control System (CTCS) - the Communication System which allows the transfer of messages to and from the There are very similar features between train. Chinese and European Railways in terms of CTCS has several levels: train operation mode and train control. ETCS - CTCS-0: Track Circuit + Cab Signalling + (European Train Control System), supported LKJ2000; by the EU and the European Industrials, has - CTCS-1: Track Circuit + Cab Signalling + been finalized as the technical standard of LKJ2000 + Balise; train control systems in Europe after more - CTCS-2: Track Circuit + Balise + ATP, the than ten years effort [2]. track circuit is used both for block Modern CBTC systems consist of four parts occupation detection and movement (Fig. 2): authorization, its architecture is similar - the Control Centre System which controls to TVM-300; the operation; - CTCS-3D: Track Circuit - the Wayside System which receives train + Balise + ATP CTCS-3D is equivalent to positions and issues Movement Authorities the European ETCS Level-1; to assure the safe running of the trains; - CTCS-3: Balise + GSM-R + ATP, using - CTCS-2 as the backup system, CTCS-3 is - - the Vehicle System that generates the train equivalent to the European ETCS Level-2 + position and receives the movement CTCS-2; Authorities and assures the compliance of the - CTCS-4: Balise + GSM-R + ATP, moving Movement Authorities; block. Збірник наукових праць ДонІЗТ. 2013 № 36 107 АВТОМАТИКА, ТЕЛЕМЕХАНІКА, ЗВ’ЯЗОК Following important railway lines are already - (455 km Zheng – Xi line) HSR Zhengzhou completed fitted with GSM-R [3]: – Xian; - (115 km Jing-Jin line) HSR Beijing – - (275 km Fu-Xia line) HSR Fuzhou – Tianjin; Xiamen; - (156 km He-Ning line) HSR Hefei – - (116 km Guang-Shen line) HSR Nanjing; Guangzhou Shenzhen; - (189 km Shi-Tai line) HSR Shijiazhuang – - (308 km Chang-Jiu line) HSR Nanchang – Taiyuan; Jiujiang; - (357 km He-Wu line) HSR Hefei – Wuhan; - (1318 km Jing – Hu line) HSR Beijing – - (279 km Yong-Tai-Wen line) HSR Ningbo Shanghai; – Wenzhou; - (111 km Chang-Ji line) HSR Changchun – - (294 km Wen-Fu line) HSR Wenzhou – Jilin; Fuzhou; - (308 km Hainan line) HSR Haikou-Sanya. - (1 956 km Qingzang line) Lhasa-Geermu On major sections of the following railway line; lines, GSM-R has been installed: (2 553 km - (653 km Daqing line) Datong – Tianjin Jing-Jiu line) railway line; - Beijing – Hong Kong railway line; - (968 km Wu-Guang line) HSR Wuhan – - (261 km Wu-Jiu line) Wuhan – Guangzhou; Jiujiang railway line. - (393 km Jiao-Ji line) Qingdao – Jinan railway line; Figure 2. Block Diagram of a modern CBTC system. CTCS on China railways is presented on Fig.3. Збірник наукових праць ДонІЗТ. 2013 № 36 108 АВТОМАТИКА, ТЕЛЕМЕХАНІКА, ЗВ’ЯЗОК Figure 3. CTCS on Chinese railways Indian (Pakistan) railway signalling for 6 voice channels for communication systems[4] among these stations. This system was developed indigenously by SR, the Dept. of The absolute block system is the most Electronics, and IIT Madras. widespread method of train working on A lot of variety of systems areused on the Indian railway. The block sections may be Indian railways, for example: handled manually or automatically, or by - Mumbai CSTM – Badlapur: Automatic some combination of those. Some sections Multiple Aspect Colour Light Signals; still use different forms of physical token - Badlapur - Pune - Daund : Manually systems such as the Neale's Ball Token controlled Multiple Aspect Colour Light instruments. Signals; AWS (Automatic Warning System) is an - Daund - Manmad : Lower Quadrant in-cab signal warning system, is used in Semaphore signals; suburban EMU systems, primarily Mumbai. - Daund - Solapur: Some stretches of It was proposed for main lines including New Multiple Aspect Colour Light Signals and Delhi - Agra, Howrah - Mughalsarai, etc. some sections of Tokenless Upper quadrant A Train Management System (TMS) semaphore; from Bombardier is used on the Mumbai - Pune - Miraj - Kolhapur : Neale's ball token suburban system (Churchgate - Virar) which instrument; provides centralized online monitoring of - Batala - Qadian, GarhiHarsuru - train positions. Farukhnagar : One Train Only system; Around Chennai, several suburban - Tilwara - TilwaraMela : Train Staff and stations have their signals automatically Ticket system. controllable from Basin Bridge using a fault- In order to ensure that the signalling tolerant system that interconnects the system never provides unsafe (conflicting) signalling of up to 32 stations using a dual signals and the points are not set for more fibre-optic ring. This system also provides than one train that might end up proceeding Збірник наукових праць ДонІЗТ. 2013 № 36 109 АВТОМАТИКА, ТЕЛЕМЕХАНІКА, ЗВ’ЯЗОК on to the same section of track and hence major metropolises, and later on other main suffering a collision, various schemes have lines. been developed to coordinate the settings of Indian railways department is also the points and the signals within the region considering the use of GSM-R technology on controlled by a signalbox or signal cabin. On parts of its network. Siemens AG is the Indian railways are used the following supplying GSM-R equipment for 700 route- interlocking systems: km of the NFR in West Bengal, Assam, and - Mechanically operated interlocking; Bihar as an initial project for IR to - Manually operated interlocking; experiment with the technology. The North - Hepper's Key Transmitter; Central and East Central zones are also - Electrically operated interlocking. setting up some GSM-R services. There are three levels of interlocking A Train Protection and Warning System used by Indian railways: (TPWS), based on ETCS Level 1 has been I - interlocked station has mechanical proposed for the Chennai Beach - interlocking. Gummidipoondi section. EMUs will be II - interlocked station may be monitored using track balises and lineside mechanically or electrically interlocked transmission devices (LEU or Lineside (usually the latter). Electronic Unit). III - interlocked station has points and signals that are either interconnected ERTMS projects in TCDD (Turkish mechanically within the same mechanism, or Railways) electrically as with route-relay and panel interlocking. Current situation with signalling systems Indian railways department is looking in TCDD Railway Network: into procuring ETCS level 2 equipment to be installed on the trunk lines between the four Length of Railways: 10.991 km Electrified Lines: 2.336 km Main Line: 8.697 km, Signaled Lines: 3.111 km Secondary Line: 2.294 km Збірник наукових праць ДонІЗТ. 2013 № 36 110 АВТОМАТИКА, ТЕЛЕМЕХАНІКА, ЗВ’ЯЗОК Figure 4. ERTMS projects on Turkish Railways High speed train projects: Ankara – used the specially designed electric relays to Istanbul, Ankara – Konya, Ankara – Sivas. increase safety in these systems. New systems which will be introduced A part of interlocking and blocking within the project: systems is ALSN. It is a train control system - ERTMS/ETCS L1 and GSM-R; meaning Continuous Automatic Train - Electronic interlocking (SSI), SIL4; Signalling used widely on the main
Recommended publications
  • Signalling System
    CHAPTER 11 SIGNALLING SYSTEM 11.1 SIGNALLING 11.2 SIGNALLING AND TRAIN CONTROL 11.3 SPACE REQUIREMENT FOR SIGNALLING INSTALLATIONS 11.4 MAINTENANCE PHILOSOPHY FOR SIGNALLING SYSTEMS TABLES TABLE 11.1 SIGNALLING SYSTEM STANDARDS Chapter 11: Signalling System Chapter - 11 SIGNALLING SYSTEM 11.0 SIGNALLING 11.1 Introduction The signaling system shall provide the means for an efficient train control, ensuring safety in train movements. It assists in optimization of metro infrastructure investment and running of efficient train services on the network. 11.2 SIGNALLING AND TRAIN CONTROL 11.2.1 Overview Metro carries large number of passengers at a very close headway requiring a very high level of safety enforcement and reliability. At the same time heavy investment in infrastructure and rolling stock necessitates optimization of its capacity to provide the best services to the public. These requirements of the metro are planned to be achieved by adopting ‘CATC’ (Continuous Automatic Train Control System) based on “CBTC” (Communication based Train Control System) which includes ATP (Automatic Train Protection), ATO (Automatic Train Operation) and ATS (Automatic Train Supervision) sub-systems using radio communication between Track side and Train. This will: • Provide high level of safety with trains running at close headway ensuring continuous safe train separation and for bidirectional working. • Eliminate accidents due to driver passing Signal at Danger by continuous speed monitoring and automatic application of brake in case of disregard of signal / warning by the driver. • Provides safety and enforces speed limit on section having permanent and temporary speed restrictions. • Improve capacity with safer and smoother operations. Driver will have continuous display of Target Speed / Distance to Go status in his cab enabling him to optimize DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR NAGPUR METRO RAIL PROJECT NOV 2013 1/6 Chapter 11: Signalling System the speed potential of the track section.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of a New Hardware and Software Platform for Railway Interlocking
    Selection of a new hardware and software platform for railway interlocking Arghya Kamal Bhattacharya School of Electrical Engineering Thesis submitted for examination for the degree of Master of Science in Technology. Espoo 27.04.2020 Supervisor Prof. Valeriy Vyatkin Advisor MSc. Tommi Kokkonen Copyright ⃝c 2020 Arghya Kamal Bhattacharya Aalto University, P.O. BOX 11000, 00076 AALTO www.aalto.fi Abstract of the master’s thesis Author Arghya Kamal Bhattacharya Title Selection of a new hardware and software platform for railway interlocking Degree programme Automation and Electrical Engineering Major Control, Robotics and Autonomous Systems Code of major ELEC3025 Supervisor Prof. Valeriy Vyatkin Advisor MSc. Tommi Kokkonen Date 27.04.2020 Number of pages 82+34 Language English Abstract The interlocking system is one of the main actors for safe railway transportation. In most cases, the whole system is supplied by a single vendor. The recent regulations from the European Union direct for an “open” architecture to invite new game changers and reduce life-cycle costs. The objective of the thesis is to propose an alternative platform that could replace a legacy interlocking system. In the thesis, various commercial off-the-shelf hardware and software products are studied which could be assembled to compose an alternative interlocking platform. The platform must be open enough to adapt to any changes in the constituent elements and abide by the proposed baselines of new standardization initiatives, such as ERTMS, EULYNX, and RCA. In this thesis, a comparative study is performed between these products based on hardware capacity, architecture, communication protocols, programming tools, security, railway certifications, life-cycle issues, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to Consultation on New ORR Guidance on Principles of Level Crossing Safety – Published June 2021
    Responses to consultation on new ORR guidance on Principles of Level Crossing Safety – Published June 2021 Aberdeen City Council Amey Rail Ltd ASLEF Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and Transport (ADEPT) Atkins British Horse Society (The) Central Bedfordshire Council Costain Dartford Borough Council Denbighshire County Council Dumfries and Galloway Council Ed Rollings Associates Ltd Essex County Council Friends of the Far North Line Furrer+Frey Overhead Contact Lines Gloucestershire County Council Individual number 1 Individual number 2 Individual number 3 Individual number 4 Individual number 5 Individual number 6 Individual number 7 Individual number 8 IOHS Kilnside Farm Network Rail North Yorkshire Moors Railway Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) Peak and Northern Footpaths Society Rail Crossing Safety Consultants Limited Rail Delivery Group Ricardo Rail Limited RSSB Shropshire County Council Sotera Risk Solutions South Lanarkshire Council Suffolk County Council Surrey County Council Systra The Ramblers The Ramblers – Dorset Area The Ramblers – Swindon and North East Wiltshire Group Transport for London (TfL) UKTram Victa Railfreight Warwickshire County Council West Somerset Railway PLC From: Graeme McKenzie (Aberdeen City Council) Sent: 26 February 2021 18:15 To: Level Crossing Principles <[email protected]> Subject: ORR Consultation - "Principles for managing level crossing safety" Please find a response on behalf of Aberdeen City Council with respect to the ORR consultation on the proposed guidance "PRINCIPLES FOR MANAGING LEVEL CROSSING SAFETY". 1. Who are you responding as (an individual/for an organisation) and what is your role? Operations and Protective Services, Aberdeen City Council – Technical Officer, Traffic Management and Road Safety 2.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSMISSION MODULE (STM) – EBICAB GENERAL TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Version 100 200 E 004 V
    Approved Approved SPECIFIC TRANSMISSION MODULE (STM) – EBICAB GENERAL TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS Version 100 200 E 004 v. 6.1 GRS STM General Technical Requirements Specification TR GRS v6.1 2017-05-12 Sign:______ Sign:______ Document Modification History Version Modification Valid from Prepared Approved Updated requirements for Baseline 3 accor- M Olsson, 6.1 12 Maj 2017 ding to [STM-Delta-FRS-B3-List-v0.12]. Trafikverket Updated requirements for Baseline 3 accor- 6 ding to [STM-Delta-FRS-B3-List-v0.06]. 10 Oct.2014 B Bryntse, ÅF Updated requirements for Baseline 2 accor- 5.2 ding to [STM-Delta-FRS-List-v1.26] 8 Oct 2014 B Bryntse, ÅF Updated or new national requirements: B Bryntse, 5.1 G64, G57A, G57B. Index chapter added. 28.10.2009 Improved format of text and headers. Teknogram 5.0 Update of national requirements 26.6.2009 S Wallin 4.2 “STM Delta-GRS-List ver A” is introduced K.Hallberg 4.1 Final corrections 15.2.2007 U.Svensson F. Åhlander 4.0 I/F C deleted, recorder info changed U.Svensson Changes according to STM National, 3.0 new I/F F U.Svensson 2.1 Clarification G 58, G34 and G35 15.4.2003 J Öhrström S-H Nilsson 2.0 Added info regarding radio I/F chapter 2.3 20.6.2002 F Åhlander S-H Nilsson 1.4 For approval by RHK, JBV, BV 6.6.2002 F Åhlander S-H Nilsson EBICAB STM General technical Requirements Specification – 100 200 E 004 Version 6.1 100 200 E 004 Version 6.1 Page 3 (35) EBICAB STM General Technical Requirements Specification List of contents 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................5 1.1 Applicable standards ....................................................................................5 1.2 List of definitions ...........................................................................................7 1.3 System definition ...........................................................................................8 2 INTERFACES ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • B COMMISSION DECISION of 7 November 2006 Concerning A
    2006D0860 — EN — 24.01.2013 — 004.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ►B COMMISSION DECISION of 7 November 2006 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European high speed rail system and modifying Annex A to Decision 2006/679/EC concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (notified under document number C(2006) 5211) (Text with EEA relevance) (2006/860/EC) (OJ L 342, 7.12.2006, p. 1) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ►M1 Commission Decision 2007/153/EC of 6 March 2007 L 67 13 7.3.2007 ►M2 Commission Decision 2008/386/EC of 23 April 2008 L 136 11 24.5.2008 ►M3 Commission Decision 2010/79/EC of 19 October 2009 L 37 74 10.2.2010 ►M4 Commission Decision 2012/463/EU of 23 July 2012 L 217 11 14.8.2012 2006D0860 — EN — 24.01.2013 — 004.001 — 2 ▼B COMMISSION DECISION of 7 November 2006 concerning a technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European high speed rail system and modifying Annex A to Decision 2006/679/EC concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system (notified under document number C(2006) 5211) (Text with EEA relevance) (2006/860/EC) THE COMMISSION
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open TM Database Composite.Pdf
    • • • • TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS • DATABASE • COMPOSITE CATEGORIES • CLASSIFICATION & INDEX • • • -­ • III III • 1 TRANSPORTATION-MARKINGS: A STUDY IN CO.MMUNICATION MONOGRAPH SERIES Alternate Series Title: An Inter-modal Study of Safety Aids Transportatiol1-Markings Database Alternate T-M Titles: Transport [ation] Mark [ing]s / Transport Marks / Waymarks T-MFoundations, 4th edition, 2005 (Part A, Volume I, First Studies in T-M) (3rd edition, 1999; 2nd edition, 1991) Composite Categories A First Study in T-M: The US, 2nd edition, 1993 (Part B, Vol I) Classification & Index International Marine Aids to Navigation, 2nd edition, 1988 (parts C & D, Vol I) [Unified First Edition ofParts A-D, University Press ofAmerica, 1981] International Traffic Control Devices, 2nd edition, 2004 (Part E, Volume II, Further Studies in T-M) (lst edition, 1984) Part Iv Volume III, Additional Studies, International Railway Signals, 1991 (Part F, Vol II) International Aero Navigation Aids, 1994 (Part G, Vol II) Transportation-Markil1gs: A Study il1 T-M General Classification with Index, 2nd edition, 2004 (Part H, Vol II) (1st edition, 1994) Commllnication Monograph Series Transportation-Markings Database: Marine Aids to Navigation, 1st edition, 1997 (I'art Ii, Volume III, Additional Studies in T-M) TCDs, 1st edition, 1998 (Part Iii, Vol III) Railway Signals. 1st edition, 2000 (part Iiii, Vol III) Aero Nav Aids, 1st edition, 2001 (Part Iiv, Vol III) Composite Categories Classification & Index, 1st edition, 2006 (part Iv, Vol III) (2nd edition ofDatabase, Parts Ii-v,
    [Show full text]
  • Nl — 24.01.2013 — 004.001 — 1
    2006D0860 — NL — 24.01.2013 — 004.001 — 1 Dit document vormt slechts een documentatiehulpmiddel en verschijnt buiten de verantwoordelijkheid van de instellingen ►B BESCHIKKING VAN DE COMMISSIE van 7 november 2006 betreffende de technische specificaties inzake interoperabiliteit van het subsysteem „Besturing en seingeving” van het trans-Europees hogesnelheidsspoorwegsysteem en tot wijziging van bjlage A bij Beschikking 2006/679/EG betreffende de technische specificaties inzake interoperabiliteit van het subsysteem „Besturing en Seingeving” van het conventionele trans-Europese spoorwegsysteem (Kennisgeving geschied onder nummer C(2006) 5211) (Voor de EER relevante tekst) (2006/860/EG) (PB L 342 van 7.12.2006, blz. 1) Gewijzigd bij: Publicatieblad nr. blz. datum ►M1 Beschikking 2007/153/EG van de Commissie van 6 maart 2007 L 67 13 7.3.2007 ►M2 Beschikking 2008/386/EG van de Commissie van 23 april 2008 L 136 11 24.5.2008 ►M3 Beschikking 2010/79/EG van de Commissie van 19 oktober 2009 L 37 74 10.2.2010 ►M4 Besluit 2012/463/EU van de Commissie van 23 juli 2012 L 217 11 14.8.2012 2006D0860 — NL — 24.01.2013 — 004.001 — 2 ▼B BESCHIKKING VAN DE COMMISSIE van 7 november 2006 betreffende de technische specificaties inzake interoperabiliteit van het subsysteem „Besturing en seingeving” van het trans-Europees hogesnelheidsspoorwegsysteem en tot wijziging van bjlage A bij Beschikking 2006/679/EG betreffende de technische specificaties inzake interoperabiliteit van het subsysteem „Besturing en Seingeving” van het conventionele trans-Europese spoorwegsysteem
    [Show full text]
  • Enhanced ETCS L2/L3 Train Control System
    Advanced Train Control Systems 113 Enhanced ETCS_L2/L3 train control system D. Emery Laboratory for Intermodality and Transport Planning (LITEP), École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland Abstract The last decade has seen the development of the European Train Control System ERTMS/ETCS. This Automatic Train Protection system (ATP) was designed in three versions: ETCS_Level 1, 2 and 3. ETCS_Level_3 uses moving blocks and provides short headways. However, ETCS_Level 2 may also offer short headways provided suitable length of each block sections. The proposed train control system could be seen as an enhancement of ETCS-Level 2 or Level 3. The main advantage of this new control system is to provide shorter headways than ETCS can. This offers the potential for capacity increases, particularly for busy High Speed Lines (HSL). Keywords: ATP, braking curves, capacity, ETCS, ERTMS, headway, high speed line (HSL), interlocking, moving block, Semi-Automatic Train Operation (SATO). 1 Interoperability, safety and capacity with ETCS 1.1 ETCS for interoperability and safety The European Train Control System was firstly developed to offer to the European Rail community a common Automatic Train Protection system in replacement of the existing ones. In theory, this is needed urgently as more than Table 1: ETCS and some ATP spot transmission. Crocodile KVB Indusi, PZB ETCS L1 (France, Belgium) (France) (Germany) and higher Transmission Electric through Transponder Magnetic Transponder system mechanical contact WIT Transactions on State of the Art in Science and Engineering, Vol 46, © 2010 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1755-8336 (on-line) doi:10.2495/978-1-84564-494-9/13 114 Advanced Train Control Systems 15 different and incompatible ATP systems equip the European main rail networks (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade Crossings - Handbook
    GRADE CROSSINGS - HANDBOOK 2016-12-14 RDIMS # 12526323 This document is meant to be used in conjunction with the Grade Crossings Regulations as well as the Grade Crossings Standards. i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ II FORWARD ............................................................................................................................................ 1 PART A – PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................... 2 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 3 DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 4 ARTICLE 1 – INTERPRETATION ......................................................................................................... 7 ARTICLE 1.1 – AREMA INTERPRETATIONS ................................................................................... 13 ARTICLE 2 – CITATIONS ................................................................................................................... 14 ARTICLE 3 – UNITS OF MEASUREMENT .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ertms Unit Assignment of Values to Etcs Variables
    Making the railway system work better for society. ERTMS UNIT ASSIGNMENT OF VALUES TO ETCS VARIABLES Reference: ERA_ERTMS_040001 Document type: Technical Version : 1.30 Date : 22/02/21 PAGE 1 OF 78 120 Rue Marc Lefrancq | BP 20392 | FR-59307 Valenciennes Cedex Tel. +33 (0)327 09 65 00 | era.europa.eu ERA ERTMS UNIT ASSIGNMENT OF VALUES TO ETCS VARIABLES AMENDMENT RECORD Version Date Section number Modification/description Author(s) 1.0 17/02/10 Creation of file E. LEPAILLEUR 1.1 26/02/10 Update of values E. LEPAILLEUR 1.2 28/06/10 Update of values E. LEPAILLEUR 1.3 24/01/11 Use of new template, scope and application E. LEPAILLEUR field, description of the procedure, update of values 1.4 08/04/11 Update of values, inclusion of procedure, E. LEPAILLEUR request form and statistics, frozen lists for variables identified as baseline dependent 1.5 11/08/11 Update of title and assignment of values to E. LEPAILLEUR NID_ENGINE, update of url in annex A. 1.6 17/11/11 Update of values E. LEPAILLEUR 1.7 15/03/12 New assignment of values to various E. LEPAILLEUR variables 1.8 03/05/12 Update of values E.LEPAILLEUR 1.9 10/07/12 Update of values, see detailed history of E.LEPAILLEUR assignments in A.2 1.10 08/10/12 Update of values, see detailed history of A. HOUGARDY assignments in A.2 1.11 20/12/12 Update of values, see detailed history of O. GEMINE assignments in A.2 A. HOUGARDY Update of the contact address of the request form in A.4 1.12 22/03/13 Update of values, see detailed history of O.
    [Show full text]
  • Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe
    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Railway Signalling
    1 The influence of railway signalling characteristics on resilience Rogier Simons, Master student, Transport Infranstructure and Logistics, TU Delft long time span of the replacement. Now, seven corridors have Abstract—Seven disrupted scenarios have been simulated on the been designated to be overhauled before 2030. In the decision railway corridor Utrecht-Den Bosch, each over three signalling making of implementing ETCS, several factors have been of configurations to find the effect of in-cab signalling and reduced block section lengths on resilience. Furthermore, the place of relevance, such as the need for replacement on a corridor, resilience in decision making and design of railway signalling the cost of the replacement, the capacity and safety benefits, has been investigated. and international interoperability. On the more practical side, Although resilience is only one of the factors in the decision during the design and engineering phase of an ETCS-corridor, making and design of ETCS-projects, besides factors such as most of the same factors are of importance on how to convert capacity, safety and interoperability, a quantification of resilience can help to either compare alternatives on all factors including from the legacy system to ETCS. For example, a larger budget resilience, to compare alternatives on resilience only, or to find can lead to a design where the block sections lengths can be the relation between design choices and resilience. adapted, creating more capacity and resilience. Simulation of seven disrupted traffic scenarios has shown that Resilience is another factor which is potentially relevant using in-cab signalling with ETCS L2 compared to line-side in the decision making.
    [Show full text]