DOCSLIB.ORG

2010 B U D G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2010 B U D G 2010 B U D G E T As adopted by the Board on December 2, 2009 The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented an award for Distinguished Budget Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communications device. The award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. RESOLUTION NO. 09-41 Adopting 2010 Budget WHEREAS, on September 1, 2009, the Board of Directors conducted a work session on the upcoming budget for 2010 at which the President and Chief Executive Officer presented the major challenges that the budget would need to address, and the Board of Directors raised a number of concerns and expectations; WHEREAS, on October 21, 2009, the Finance Committee of the Board received and discussed an initial draft version of a proposed 2010 Budget; WHEREAS, on November 4, 2009, the Finance Committee of the Board received and discussed a revised draft version of a proposed 2010 Budget, and directed certain revisions; WHEREAS, on November 18, 2009, the Finance Committee of the Board received and discussed a revised draft version of the proposed 2010 Budget and recommended its approval, subject to certain revisions, to the Board; WHEREAS, on December 2, 2009, the Board received the final proposed 2010 Budget (“2010 Budget”), as well as the recommendation of the Finance Committee; WHEREAS, in the 2009 Budget an unprecedented escalation in energy costs and a forecasted decline in airline passenger activity put strain on the Airports Authority’s cost structure; WHEREAS, to minimize increases to the airline rates and charges, the 2009 Budget included $14.4 million of the Airports Authority’s net remaining revenue to pay for certain operating expenses; WHEREAS, to eliminate the need to recover debt service related to the AeroTrain in the 2009 airline rates and charges, the 2009 Budget incorporated the restructuring of the Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) program to pay all such debt service; WHEREAS, to provide forZ009 Performance Management PartnerShip mitigate the PMP cost to the airlines, the 2009 Budget (PMP) and to increased the airlines' share of Net Remaining Revenue (NRR) earned in 2008 by' $3,5 million and the Airports Authority's share of 2008 NRR decreased by $3.5 million; WHEREAS, in 2010, the Airports Authority's cost structure will be subject to added pressutes with a full yearis cost of the AeroTrain; WHEREAS, toredûce the héed to recover debt service related to the . ÄeroTrâin artdminiriize 2010 airline rates and charges, the 2010 Budgét i~cor~()rates the restructuring of the Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) program to pay $82.0 million of such debt service; WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Board of Directors that such financial rEmer as the 2009 Budget provided, and the 2010 Budget wil provide, to the airlines is temporary,ahdthe Boàrd will determine on an annual basis the need, if any, for continued airline financial relief; WHEREAS, . the Board has determined that the 2010 Budget presents a reasonable lèvèldfex:penditures, to be. made or atcruedin2010, (a)fronithe Aviation, Ertterprisé Fund, to operate Ronald Reagan Washington. National and Wa'shington Dulles International Airpo"rts, to repair and maintain thefaèiihiés at thése Airpórts,and to undertake neédéd capital improvements at the Airports, and (b) from the Dulles Corridor Enterprise Fund, to operate the Dulles Toll Road to repair and maintain Toll Road facilities, to undertake capitalimprovernentsfor the betterment of the Toll Road, and to continue construction of a Metrorail line from theexisting West Falls Church Metro station to Wiehle Avenue and eventually to and past Dulles Airport ("Dulles Rail Project"), and that there wil be sufficient revenues in 2010 and other funds to cover these expenditures; and WHEREAS, under the statutes creating the Airports Authority, Va. Code § 5.1..175(D) and D.C. Code § 9..904(d), eight affirmative votes of the Board of Directörs are requited to adopt the annual budget of the Airports Authority; NOW, THERË~ORE, BE liRESOLVËD 1. That the 2010 Budget, as presented to the Board of Directors on December 2,2009, is hereby approved and adopted; 2. That the 2010 Aviation Enterprise Fund Budget includes elements to minimize the increase to airline rates and charges and that it is the Board's intent to evaluate on an annual basis the continued need, if any, for future airline relief; 2 3. That the following sums, totaling $935,999,000, are hereby authorizéd to be expended from the Aviation Enterprise Fund in 2010 for the operation, rnaintenánce,care, improvement and protection of Ronald ReaganWashiiigtol1 National and Washington Dulles International Airports: (a) $558,627,000 for the Aviation Operation and Maintenance Program, including $242,338,000 of this total for debt service; (b) $50,106,000 for the Aviation Capital, Operating and Maintenance Ihvestmént.Program; and (c) $327,266,000 for the Aviation Capital Construction Program; 4. That the folloWing sums, totaling $978,915,770, are hereby authorized tò be. expended from the Dulles Corridor Enterprise Fund in 2010 for fhe operation, maintenance, care, improvement and protection of the Dulles Toll Road and for the planning, design and construction of the Dulles Rail Project: (a) $71,011,000 for the Dulles Corridor Operation and Maintenance Program, including $46,365,000 of this total for debt service; (b) $5,0'15,000 for the Dulles Corridor Renewal and Replacement Prögram; (c) $902,883,770 for the Dulles Corridor Capital Improvement Program, consisting of $27,605,770 for Corridor Improvements and $875,278,000 for the Dulles Rail Project; and (d) $17,843,000 to be transferred to reserve accounts within the Dulles Corridor Enterprise Fund, as identified in the 2010 Budget; and, fürlhér, that any révenue received or accrued by the Dulles Corridor Entèrprise irl 2010 which, at the conclusion of 2010, has not been expended, obligated or trähsfè'rred to a reserve account pursuant to subparagraph (d) of this paragraph, or to à reserve fund or account pursuant to the Master Indenture of Trust SeCl.lririg Dulles Toll Road Revenue Bonds, dated as of August 1, 2009, shall be transferred to the Dulles Corridor Enterprise Reserve and Toll Rate Stabilization Fund. 5. That the President and Chief Executive Officer is hereby authorized to modify or adjust expenditures within each of the six programs identified in Paragraph :3 and Paragraph 4, so long as the total expenditures within any such 3 program in 2010 do not exceed the level authorized for the program in Paragraph 3 or Paragraph 4; 6. __ Thafthe nëw and expanded projects identified in the2010 Budget, and in attachments to this Resolution, in the amount of (i) $25,200,000 within the AViation Capital Operating and Maintenance Investment Program (Attachment 1), (ii)$92;geO,000 within the,Aviation Capital Construction-Program (Attachmënt 2), (iil) $1,760,000 within the _ Dulles Corridor _ Renewal and Replacement Pr~grarn (Attachment 3), and (iv) $38,431,000 _ within the Dulles Corridor Capital Improvement Program, cotlsisting of $931,000 for the DUlles Toll Road and $37,500,000 for the Dulles Rail Project (Attachment 4), are hereby approved,and hereafter shall be considered a part of their respective approved programs; and 7. That thiS Rèsolutiöh shall be effective upon its adoption; provided, that the delegation of aiifhörity provided in paragraph 5 shall b"e effective on January 1, 2010, and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2010. Adopted December 2,2009 Quince T.Brinkley, Jr., Secretary RECORDED VOTE: Members Present -. Members in Favor _ _ 12 Members Against -- Members Abstaining 0 4 METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY 2010 BUDGET JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 2010 BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Honorable H.R. Crawford, Chairman Mame Reiley, Immediate Past Chairman Charles D. Snelling, Vice Chairman Robert Clarke Brown The Honorable William W. Cobey Jr. Frank M. Conner III Mamadi Diané The Honorable Michael David Epstein Jack Andrew Garson Leonard Manning Dennis L. Martire Michael L. O=Reilly The Honorable David G. Speck EXECUTIVE STAFF James E. Bennett, President and Chief Executive Officer Margaret E. McKeough, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Lynn Hampton, CPA, Vice President for Finance and Chief Financial Officer Andrew T. Rountree, CPA, Deputy Chief Financial Officer Rita Alston, Budget Manager INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page President=s Budget Message....................................................................................................... 1 BUDGET PROGRAMS AND ORGANIZATION Budget for Aviation and Dulles Corridor Enterprise Funds .......................................... 15 Purpose, Mission, and Goals.......................................................................................... 17 Budget Preparation, Reporting and Amendment Process .............................................. 19 Budget Calendar for 2010 .............................................................................................. 22 Organization Structure ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 22Nd Annual Greater Washington Aviation Open
    THE 22ND ANNUAL GREatER WASHINgtON AVIatION OPEN Charity Golf Tournament & Auction Lansdowne Resort Lansdowne, Virginia May 24, 2010 3213 Duke Street, #207, AlexAndriA, VirginiA 22314 • www.gwAo.org Dear Friends of the GWAO: We welcome everyone to the 22nd Annual Greater Washington Aviation Open – the largest aviation charity event in Washington, DC. Given the state of the economy, it is a testament to the great support the tournament has received from the aviation industry. As our contributions from the GWAO to the Corporate Angel Network continue to grow, so has the number of cancer patients they have transported to treatment facilities across the country. CAN has now transported over 34,000 patients in the empty seats of corporate aircraft for life-saving medical treatment at some of our nation’s finest hospitals. We are very pleased to have Clay Jones, Chairman, President, and CEO of Rockwell Collins, serve as our Honorary Chairman this year. Clay has served on many important aviation boards, and his leadership and service are recognized by all in the industry. His participation today as our Honorary Chairman of the 22nd Annual GWAO is appreciated and well warranted. The GWAO would not be the premier charity event that it is without the tremendous support of Diamond Sponsor FlightSafety International and Gold Sponsor Aviation Partners Boeing. Through their very generous donations we are well on our way to a successful tournament. They are joined by other major donors in this program and are on our signage in recognition of their wonderful support. The airlines that have donated tickets for the live auction this year also merit our special recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • Nantucket Memorial Airport Page 32
    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE NATIONAL AIR TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION 2nd Quarter 2011 Nantucket Memorial Airport page 32 Also Inside: • A Workers Compensation Controversy • Swift Justice: DOT Enforcement • Benefits of Airport Minimum Standards GET IT ALL AT AVFUEL All Aviation Fuels / Contract Fuel / Pilot Incentive Programs Fuel Quality Assurance / Refueling Equipment / Aviation Insurance Fuel Storage Systems / Flight Planning and Trip Support Global Supplier of Aviation Fuel and Services 800.521.4106 • www.avfuel.com • facebook.com/avfuel • twitter.com/AVFUELtweeter NetJets Ad - FIRST, BEST, ONLY – AVIATION BUSINESS JOURNAL – Q2 2011 First. Best. Only. NetJets® pioneered the concept of fractional jet ownership in 1986 and became a Berkshire Hathaway company in 1998. And to this day, we are driven to be the best in the business without compromise. It’s why our safety standards are so exacting, our global infrastructure is so extensive, and our service is so sophisticated. When it comes to the best in private aviation, discerning fl iers know there’s Only NetJets®. SHARE | LEASE | CARD | ON ACCOUNT | MANAGEMENT 1.877.JET.0139 | NETJETS.COM A Berkshire Hathaway company All fractional aircraft offered by NetJets® in the United States are managed and operated by NetJets Aviation, Inc. Executive Jet® Management, Inc. provides management services for customers with aircraft that are not fractionally owned, and provides charter air transportation services using select aircraft from its managed fleet. Marquis Jet® Partners, Inc. sells the Marquis Jet Card®. Marquis Jet Card flights are operated by NetJets Aviation under its 14 CFR Part 135 Air Carrier Certificate. Each of these companies is a wholly owned subsidiary of NetJets Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Terminal Impedances JEFFREY M
    -Passenger Terminal Impedances JEFFREY M. BRUGGEMAN and RICHARD D. WORRALL, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Co. Conventional transportation network analysis requires the estimation of the times necessary to complete three portions of a typical intercity trip. Al­ though the times associated with the line-haul and access portions have been studied extensively, the time required for transfer between access and line­ haul modes has not been handled adequately. These times, or impedances, occur at any intercity passenger terminal for air, rail, and bus modes. This paper identifies each of the major components of the passenger ter­ minal system and develops the respective impedance methodology for each as well as a technique for combining them into a single value representative of the total impedance level for a particular terminal. Data were collected at several intercity terminals in the Washington, D. C., area; and the im­ pedance levels were determined for each terminal. The methodology and many of the component values are directly transferable to other terminals. In addition, the methodology may be used as an aid in evaluating alternative functional arrangements of the various terminal facilities. •A CONVENTIONAL network simulation model distributes transportation flows across the network as an inverse function of the difficulty, or "impedance," of travel along each link. For a regional network, at least three major categories of impedance may be defined: 1. Link impedance is the measure of the average "line-haul" travel times, costs, or distances associated with travel along the major links of the regional network. 2. Access impedance is the measure of the average "access" times, costs, or distances involved in traveling from a typical origin or destination point to the nearest access/ egress point on the regional network.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Report 13 Tarmac Delays Over Three Hours on Domestic Flights, Three Tarmac Delays Longer Than Four Hours on International Flights in July
    DOT 79-13 Thursday, September 12, 2013 Contact: Bill Mosley Tel.: (202) 366-4570 Airlines Report 13 Tarmac Delays Over Three Hours on Domestic Flights, Three Tarmac Delays Longer Than Four Hours on International Flights in July WASHINGTON – Airlines reported 13 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and three tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights in July, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report released today. Of the 13 domestic delays, 12 involved flights departing New York’s LaGuardia Airport on July 22, the day the front landing gear of a Southwest Airlines plane collapsed upon landing at the airport, causing the airport to be closed temporarily. All of the reported tarmac delays, domestic and international, are under investigation by the Department. The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008. Under a rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports. Also beginning Aug. 23, 2011, carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours without giving passengers an opportunity to deplane. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights, which went into effect in April 2010. Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Airport As an Expression of Circulation *’
    MM'S RICE UNIVERSITY \ InrtThe Airport As An Expression Of Circulation *’ Michael Theodore Tudury A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master in Architecture W/J\AA/VUIAA Professor Milllain Cannady | Professor Anderson Todd Houston. Texas Mav 1968 TO SUSAN ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would like to express my appreciation to Mr, Anderson Todd, Mr. William Cannaday, Mr. Kellog Wong and Mr. O. Jack Mitchell, professors in the School of Architecture at Rice University, for their guidance, assistance and genuine interest in the preparation of this thesis. I would also like to thank the School of Architecture at Rice University for enabling me to undertake graduate studies through the grant of a fellowship, without which the immediate furthering of my education would have been impossible. ABSTRACT Thesis: The Airport As An Expression Of Circulation Research was undertaken of the elements and patterns of circulation of existing airport design. The study classifies the concepts and assesses the value of the- different systems. The thesis proposes a comprehensive re-evaluation of existing approaches and new concepts through con¬ centration upon the individual elements of circulation. FEBRUARY 1883: “It may be urged that there is nothing mysterious about wing motion, and a simple up and down flapping will at least suffice to raise a bird in the air. Why should not men fly? The answer is that they are not strong enough." TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS , v Chapter I. HISTORY 1 II. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM .. 6 III. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING AIRPORTS 17 Dulles International (Washington, D.C.) Memphis O’Hare (Chicago) St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bid/Proposal Custodian 4 World Trade Center 150 Greenwich Street, 21St Floor New York, New York 10007
    PROCUREMENT DEPARTMENT ATTN: BID/PROPOSAL CUSTODIAN 4 WORLD TRADE CENTER 150 GREENWICH STREET, 21ST FLOOR NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10007 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) ISSUE DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 TITLE: OPERATE, MANAGE AND MAINTAIN THE ON-AIRPORT BUS FLEET AT JOHN F. KENNEDY AND LAGUARDIA AIRPORTS RFP NUMBER: 58819 SUBMIT PROPOSALS NO LATER THAN THE DUE DATE AND TIME TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS PRE-PROPOSAL/ FACILITY INPSECTION MEETING: OCTOBER 1, 2019 TIME: 9:00 AM EDT QUESTIONS DUE BY: OCTOBER 2, 2019 TIME: 3:00 PM EDT PROPOSAL DUE DATE: OCTOBER 18, 2019 TIME: 2:00 PM EDT CONTACT: RICHARD A. GREHL EMAIL: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EMAIL: ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1. INFORMATION FOR PROPOSERS ON THIS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 4 A. General Information: The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey ............... 4 B. Brief Summary of Scope of Work ............................................................................... 4 C. Deadline for Receipt of Proposals ............................................................................... 5 D. Vendor Profile ............................................................................................................... 5 E. Submission of Proposals ............................................................................................... 5 F. Communications Regarding this RFP ........................................................................ 6 G. Proposal Acceptance or
    [Show full text]
  • FAA DOT/TSC CY1997 ACAIS Database Report Date : 12/18/97 Page : 1
    Source : FAA DOT/TSC CY1997 ACAIS Database Report Date : 12/18/97 Page : 1 CARGO CARRIER CODES LISTED BY CARRIER NAME CARCD Carrier Name CARCD ----- ------------------------------------------ ----- KHC 135 AIRWAYS, INC. KHC WRB 40-MILE AIR LTD. WRB ACD ACADEMY AIRLINES ACD AER ACE AIR CARGO EXPRESS, INC. AER VX ACES AIRLINES VX IQDA ADI DOMESTIC AIRLINES, INC. IQDA UALC ADVANCE LEASING COMPANY UALC ADV ADVANCED AIR CHARTER ADV ACI ADVANCED CHARTERS INT ACI YDVA ADVANTAGE AIR CHARTER, INC. YDVA EI AER LINGUS P.L.C. EI TPQ AERIAL TRANSIT COMPANY TPQ DGCA AERO CHARTER, INC. DGCA ML AERO COSTA RICA ML DJYA AERO EXPRESS, INC. DJYA AEF AERO FLIGHT SERVICE, INC. AEF GSHA AERO FREIGHT, INC. GSHA AGRP AERO GROUP AGRP CGYA AERO TAXI - ROCKFORD, INC. CGYA CLQ AERO TRANSCOLOMBIANA DE CARGA CLQ G3 AEROCHAGO AIRLINES, S.A. G3 EVQ AEROEJECUTIVO, C.A. EVQ XAES AEROFLIGHT EXECUTIVE SERVICES XAES SU AEROFLOT - RUSSIAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES SU AR AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS AR LTN AEROLINEAS LATINAS, C.A. LTN ROM AEROMAR C. POR. A. ROM AM AEROMEXICO AM QO AEROMEXPRESS, S.A. DE C.V. QO ACQ AERONAUTICA DE CANCUN S.A. DE C.V. ACQ HUKA AERONAUTICAL SERVICES, INC. HUKA ADQ AERONAVES DEL PERU ADQ HJKA AEROPAK, INC. HJKA PL AEROPERU PL 6P AEROPUMA, S.A. 6P EAE AEROSERVICIOS ECUATORIANOS, C.A. EAE KRE AEROSUCRE, S.A. KRE ASQ AEROSUR ASQ MY AEROTRANSPORTES MAS DE CARGA, S.A. DE C.V. MY ZU AEROVAIS COLOMBIANAS LTD. (ARCA) ZU AV AEROVIAS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA, S. A. AV ZL AFFRETAIR LTD. (PRIVATE) ZL UCAL AGRO AIR ASSOCIATES UCAL RK AIR AFRIQUE RK CC AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC CC LU AIR ATLANTIC DOMINICANA LU AX AIR AURORA, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Regulation and Airline Passengers' Rights Timothy M
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 67 | Issue 3 Article 7 2002 Re-Regulation and Airline Passengers' Rights Timothy M. Ravich Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Timothy M. Ravich, Re-Regulation and Airline Passengers' Rights, 67 J. Air L. & Com. 935 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol67/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. RE-REGULATION AND AIRLINE PASSENGERS' RIGHTS TIMOTHY M. RAViCH* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................. 935 II. PASSENGERS' BILL OF RIGHTS .................. 939 A. THE IMPETUS AND HISTORICAL AT'TEMPTS ....... 939 1. The Origin of Passengers' Rights Proposals .... 940 2. Service, Competition, and Preemption.......... 945 B. THE INITIAL EFFORT (1999-2000) ............... 947 C. THE AIRLINES' RESPONSE AND COMMITMENT .... 952 D. THE FINAL DOT REPORT AND 2001 ............. 956 III. DISCU SSIO N ...................................... 958 A. WHITHER DEREGULATION? ...................... 958 B. CULTURAL DEVOLUTION ......................... 964 C. CONTRACT As PANACEA ......................... 970 D. DEMAND MANAGEMENT ......................... 976 1. (Over)Scheduling and Infrastructure .......... 977 2. Industry Consolidation and Market Entry ..... 986 E. SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: A NEW ROLE FOR AIRLINE PASSENGERS ..................................... 992 IV. CONCLUSION ..................................... 996 I. INTRODUCTION Airline passengers increasingly expect basic airline service as a matter of law and entitlement rather than as a function of busi- * Attorney, Hunton & Williams. J.D., cum laude, University of Miami School of Law. The author presented aspects of this Article at the "Fourth International Travel and Tourism: Policy, Law and Management Conference," Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, May, 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • An Urban Transportation Bibliography
    PB 199 031 AN URBAN TRANSPORTATION BIBLIOGRAPHY May 3, 1971 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Urban Mass Transportation Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 "AN URBAN TRANSPORTATION BIBLIOGRAPHY" was published by the National Technical Information Service for Urban Mass Transportation Administration. Documents listed in this bibliography are generally avail- able from NTIS and priced at $3.00 in paper copy and 95 cents in microfiche. However, prices for paper copy are subject to change. Should the document you order cost National Technical Information Service more than $3.00, the NTIS will ship your order and bill U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMIVIERCE the difference. Please order by accession number and Springfield, Virginia 22151 title. AN URBAN TRANSPORTATION BIBLIOGRAPHY May 3, 1971 CONTENTS Foreward ii Urban Transportation 1 Subject Index SU-1 Author Index PA-1 Organization Index OR-1 FOREWORD This reference material is the first step in a planned program to make a complete compilation of technical and scientific publications concerning urban mass transportation. The list includes ab- stracts of reports, studies, articles, monographs and other publication formats. The reference is designed to serve the scientific and technical needs of State, city and local government officials, transportation planners, industry leaders, consultants, researchers, and stu- dents of urban transportation problems. In retrospect, urban transportation investments by the Federal Government started in 1951. In that year. Congress approved a pilot program of mass transit assistance to State and local public bodies. Twenty-five million dollars was provided in the Housing Act of 1961 for a limited program of mass transit demonstration grants and technical assistance, and a $50 million borrowing authori- ty was enacted to assist local capital investment programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus and Bus Stop Designs Related to Perceptions of Crime
    FTA MI-26-7004-2001.8 Bus and Bus Stop Designs Related to Perceptions of Crime Federal Transit Administration 2001 Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or the use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse manufacturers or products. Trade names appear in the document only because they are essential to the content of the report. (Upper right cover photo courtesy of WalkBoston) Bus and Bus Stop Designs Related to Perceptions of Crime Prepared by Anne Lusk, Ph.D. Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning University of Michigan 2000 Bonisteel Boulevard Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2069 [email protected] or [email protected] Sponsored by Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S Department of Transportation Washington, D.C. 20590 Prepared with assistance from Ann Arbor Transportation Authority Great Lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research Available from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) Springfield, Virginia 22161 Email [email protected] 2001 Anne Lusk received her Ph.D. from the Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning at the University of Michigan with a Major in Environment and Behavior and Minor in Urban Planning. She holds a Masters Diplome in Fashion Design from Les Ecoles de la Chambre Syndicale de la Couture Parisienne from Paris, France, a Masters of Arts in Teaching with a specialization in Historic Preservation from the University of Vermont and a Masters of Science in Architecture from the University of Michigan.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Matter of the Application of the THE
    NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD WASHINGTON, DC 20572 (202) 692-5000 In the Matter of the Application of the 37 NMB No. 39 THE ASSOCIATION OF FLIGHT CASE NO. R-7225 ATTENDANTS-CWA, AFL-CIO FINDINGS UPON alleging a representation dispute INVESTIGATION pursuant to Section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act, as May 12, 2010 amended involving employees of NJI, INC./NETJETS AVIATION, INC. This determination addresses the application filed by the Association of Flight Attendants – CWA, AFL-CIO (AFA). The AFA seeks to represent the craft or class of Flight Attendants on NJI, Inc. (NJI). NetJets Inc. (NetJets or Carrier) requests the National Mediation Board (NMB or Board) to investigate whether NJI and NetJets Aviation, Inc. (NJA) are operating as a single transportation system. The Flight Attendants at NJI are currently unrepresented, and the Flight Attendants at NJA are currently represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division (IBT). The investigation establishes that NJI and NJA do not constitute a single transportation system for purposes of the craft or class of Flight Attendants. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On November 5, 2009, the AFA filed an application alleging a representation dispute involving the Flight Attendants on NJI. The application was given NMB Case No. R-7225 and assigned to Investigator Cristina A. Bonaca. On November 20, 2009, the Carrier provided information raising system issues. - 186 - 37 NMB No. 39 On November 30, 2009, the IBT notified the Investigator that it wished to be included as a participant in the NMB’s investigation. Also on November 30, 2009, the Investigator requested the participants to comment on the system issue.
    [Show full text]