DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 Document)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 Document) Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy 2010 - 2026 Consultation Statement September 2011 Planning Committee Site Visit Protocol www.staffordshire.gov.uk Contents 1 Introduction 1 The Regulations 1 Stages of plan preparation 1 Background to joint working 1 2 Who was invited to make representations 4 Consultation in accordance with Statement of Community Involvement 4 3 How representations were invited 6 How individuals were invited to be involved in the plan preparation 6 a) Issues and Options, March 2007 7 Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 document) b) Issues and Options Part 2, September 2008 7 c) Emerging Joint Waste Core Strategy, August 2010 9 d) Revised Draft Policies, April 2011 14 4 How representations have been taken into account 21 A summary of the main issues raised and how they informed the next stage 21 a) Issues and Options, March 2007 21 b) Issues and Options Part 2, September 2008 22 c) Emerging Joint Waste Core Strategy, August 2010 32 d) Revised Draft Policies, April 2011 37 5 Next Steps 40 Timetable for preparation of Joint Waste Core Strategy 40 6 Appendices 41 Appendix 1: Poster, Issues and Options March 2007 consultation 41 Contents Appendix 2: Flyer, Issues and Options Part 2 September 2008 consultation 42 Appendix 3: Consultees List, Emerging Joint Waste Core Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 document) Strategy August 2010 consultation 43 Appendix 4: Media Campaigns 69 Support our Standards, 2010 69 Beyond the Bin, 2009 71 Appendix 5: Representations, Emerging Joint Waste Core Strategy August 2010 consultation 74 Appendix 6: Representations, Revised Draft Policies April 2011 consultation 178 Appendix 7: Press Releases 214 Issues and Options, March 2007 214 Issues and Options Part 2, September 2008 217 Appendix 8: Consultation Letters 219 Issues and Options, March 2007 219 Issues and Options Part 2, September 2008 220 Emerging Joint Waste Core Strategy, August 2010 221 Revised Draft Policies, April 2011 223 Introduction 1 1 Introduction The Regulations 1 1.1 This document comprises the ‘Consultation Statement’ for the Joint Waste Core Strategy for Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent. It has been prepared by Staffordshire County Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council in accordance with Regulation 30 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England) Regulations 2004, as amended in 2008 and 2009, ‘the Regulations’. It sets out how the Councils complied with Regulation 25 of the Regulations on public participation in production of the Joint Waste Core Strategy Development Plan Document. 1.2 Regulation 25 prescribe the need for early involvement of certain bodies as well as the local community and businesses in the preparation of Development Plan Documents (DPDs). Regulation 30 (1) (d) requires a statement setting out: Who was invited to be involved in the plan preparation; How they were invited to be involved in the plan preparation; and, Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 document) A summary of the main issues raised as a result of the consultation and how those main issues were taken into account. Stages of plan preparation 1.3 There have been four stages of the preparation of the Joint Waste Core Strategy leading up to the submission draft of the Joint Waste Core Strategy (Regulation 27 Publication Document): Issues and Options, March 2007; Issues and Options Part 2, September 2008; Emerging Joint Waste Core Strategy, August 2010; and, Revised Draft Policies for Joint Waste Core Strategy, April 2011. 1.4 This Consultation Statement details who was invited to be involved in each stage of the plan preparation and how their consultation responses were taken into account at the next stage. Background to joint working 1.5 Staffordshire County Council had originally proposed to produce a Staffordshire Waste Core Strategy Development Plan Document (DPD) and a joint Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent Waste Site Allocation Development Plan Document. Following on from Issues and Options in March 2007 for the Staffordshire Waste Core Strategy the next stage was originally intended to be to develop Preferred Options. It was also the intention for Staffordshire County Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council to commence work on a Joint Waste Site Allocations Document that same year and produce an issues and 2 Introduction options consultation document. Following advice from Government Office for the West Midlands (GOWM) and the Planning Inspectorate (PINS), and given 1 the risk in proceeding to the next stages in the absence of greater clarity and certainty about the process and the prospect of this leading to a ‘sound’ DPD, Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 document) particularly for the Core Strategy, it was proposed to delay commencement of work on both the Preferred Options for the Waste Core Strategy and the Waste Site Allocations Document whilst further work was undertaken to develop options for the Waste Core Strategy that were locally distinctive, focused on place and linked to wider planning strategies. The further work proposed was to gather evidence and engage on spatial options. 1.6 In November 2007, a resolution was sought from and approved by Members of the County and City Councils to enter into a joint working arrangement on the Waste Core Strategy Development Plan Document in accordance with Part 2 “Local Development”, Section 28 “Joint local development documents” of the “Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004”. 1.7 For a number of planning and financial reasons described below it made sense for Staffordshire County Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council to work together on preparing a Joint Waste Core Strategy: Advice from GOWM and the publication of “Lessons Learnt” by the Planning Inspectorate suggested that the Waste Core Strategy should identify “broad locations” and/or “strategic sites” for future waste development. Staffordshire County Council Planning Committee in July 2007 received a report (Agenda item 8) which included a section entitled “re-think in response to latest advice” which explained that: “Core strategies are where tough decisions need to be made: strategic decisions cannot be left to subsequent DPDs” (Development Plan Documents)”). The Planning White Paper (2007) suggested that Site Allocations DPD’s may not be needed; Stoke-on-Trent City Council and Newcastle under Lyme Borough Council were already working jointly on a Core Spatial Strategy for their combined authorities. They had been advised by the Government Office for the West Midlands to strengthen the waste policy content of their core strategy, or to consider joint working with Staffordshire County Council as a more pragmatic solution which would avoid undue delays to the preparation of their core spatial strategy. The adopted Regional Spatial Strategy and the emerging Regional Spatial Strategy draft waste policies identified the tonnages of waste requiring management to the sub-region of Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent; A draft Municipal Waste Management Strategy has been produced jointly for Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent; The waste to energy plant at Hanford, Stoke-on-Trent is a shared, strategic facility; Prior to the new plan-making regime introduced by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the County and City Council’s have Introduction 3 previously worked together to prepare the Structure Plan, Minerals Local Plan and of particular relevance, the Waste Local Plan; The cost of preparing the Waste Core Strategy would be shared. 1 1.8 To view the report to Staffordshire County Council Planning Committee on 8 November 2007 in relation to the resolution sought for joint working please use the following link: http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/Resources/Documents/123/6WasteCoreStrategyDPD81107.Doc Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 document) 4 Who was invited to make representations 2 Who was invited to make representations 2 Consultation in accordance with Statement of Community Involvement Consultation Statement (Regulation 30 document) 2.1 The Regulations require local authorities to consult widely when preparing development plan documents. In addition to ‘specific’ bodies who must be consulted, ‘general’ and other bodies relevant to the purpose of the document should be consulted. 2.2 Consultation on the various preparatory stages of the Joint Waste Core Strategy has been undertaken in accordance with both Councils Statements of Community involvement (SCI). The Staffordshire County Council SCI was adopted in June 2006. The Stoke-on-Trent City Council SCI was adopted in 2007. 2.3 Table 1 of the Staffordshire County Council SCI is replicated below and lists the specific and general types of consultation bodies/groups that we have consulted and involved in the preparation of the Joint Waste Core Strategy. Specific consultation bodies Government Office for the West Midlands (abolished 31 Mar 2011) Local District and Borough Councils Parish / Town Councils Adjoining Local and Parish Councils The Environment Agency The Coal Authority English Heritage Natural England The Highways Authority The Secretary of State for Transport Primary Care Trust Statutory Undertakers Regional Development Agency Who was invited to make representations 5 General consultation bodies 2 Mineral and Waste site operators Planning consultants and agents Voluntary groups including: Environmental Heritage Social and health Sports Residents’ associations and other local community groups Religious and equal access groups Business associations ‘Hard to Reach’ groups 2.4 Individuals and organisations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Staffordshire 30Undar Es W Th Cheshire Derbyshire Wa Rw Ckshiir and Refg Rid an D Worcester Local
    No. 5H2 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties. COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE 30UNDAR ES W TH CHESHIRE DERBYSHIRE WA RW CKSHIIR AND REFG RID AN D WORCESTER LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOH ENGLAND RETORT NO •5112 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany PATTEN.PPD THE RT. HON. CHRIS PATTEN HP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE: BOUNDARIES WITH CHESHIRE, DERBYSHIRE,. WARWICKSHIRE, AND HEREFORD AND WORCESTER COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Staffordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Staffordshire, and in the adjoining counties of Cheshire, Derbyshire, West Midlands, Shropshire, Warwickshire, Hereford and Worcester and Leicestershire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; regional health authorities; public utilities in the area; the English Tourist Board; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle; and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to co-operate as necessary with each other, and with the District Councils concerned, to assist us in publicising the start of the review, by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Studies on the Derbyshire Dome D
    SEISMIC STUDIES ON THE DERBYSHIRE DOME DAVID EDWARD ROGERS A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences The University Leeds LS2 9JT February 1983 PhD Thesis February1983 SEISMIC STUDIES ON THE DERBYSHIRE DOME D. E. ROGERS Dept Earth Sciences ABSTRACT The Derbyshire Dome is thought to have been a stable uplifted area since at least Lower Carboniferous times. This project is principally concerned with four 30km seismic refraction lines which crossed the limestone outcrop of Derbyshire and N. Staffordshire in order to investigate the Dome's upper crustal structure, using quarry blasts as seismic sources. A time-term analysis of refracted arrival data defined basement structure more complicated than implied by the surface geology. The interpretation of these data was complicated by high (5.6-5.8km/s) velocity refractions from dolomitic horizons within the limestone sequence; the mean overburden velocity was determined to be about 5.2 km/s. The Dome could be divided into two pre-Carboniferous geological units separated approx- imately by the line of the NNW trending Bonsall Fault. To the north a broadly domal refractor of velocity 5.5-5.55km/s was mapped, and thought to correlate with both the shallow pre- Carboniferous volcanics encountered by the Woo Dale borehole and"the Ordovician shales encountered by the Eyam borehole below 1.8km of limestone. This refractor accordingly deepens beneath the Carboniferous sedimentary basins flanking the Dome. To the south of the Bonsall Fault zone, the Carbonifer- ous was found to be underlain by a refractor of velocity 5.63-5.7km/s, thought to be of Precambrian material similar to the rocks of Charnwood Forest, Leicestershire, some 40km south.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire 1
    Entries in red - require a photograph STAFFORDSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position ST_ABCD06 SK 1077 4172 B5032 EAST STAFFORDSHIRE DENSTONE Quixhill Bank, between Quixhill & B5030 jct on the verge ST_ABCD07 SK 0966 4101 B5032 EAST STAFFORDSHIRE DENSTONE Denstone in hedge ST_ABCD09 SK 0667 4180 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALTON W of Gallows Green on the verge ST_ABCD10 SK 0541 4264 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALTON near Peakstones Inn, Alton Common by hedge ST_ABCD11 SK 0380 4266 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Threapwood in hedge ST_ABCD11a SK 0380 4266 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Threapwood in hedge behind current maker ST_ABCD12 SK 0223 4280 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Lightwood, E of Cheadle in hedge ST_ABCK10 SK 0776 3883 UC road EAST STAFFORDSHIRE CROXDEN Woottons, between Hollington & Rocester on the verge ST_ABCK11 SK 0617 3896 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHECKLEY E of Hollington in front of wood & wire fence ST_ABCK12 SK 0513 3817 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHECKLEY between Fole and Hollington in hedge Lode Lane, 100m SE of Lode House, between ST_ABLK07 SK 1411 5542 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Alstonefield and Lode Mill on grass in front of drystone wall ST_ABLK08 SK 1277 5600 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Keek road, 100m NW of The Hollows on grass in front of drystone wall ST_ABLK10 SK 1073 5832 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Leek Road, Archford Moor on the verge
    [Show full text]
  • White's 1857 Directory of Derbyshire
    391 WIRKSWORTH HUNDRED. ____________ This Hundred is bounded on the north and north-east by the High Peak Hundred, on the east by the Scarsdale Hundred, on the south and south-east, by the Appletree Hundred, and on the west by the river Dove, which separates it from Staffordshire, where at the north-west extremity, the Middle and Upper quarters of the parish of Hartington bound the south-west portion of the High Peak Hundred for ten miles, to the source of the rivers Dove and Goyt. This portion was, by order of Quarter Sessions of 28th June, 1831, annexed to the Bakewell division of Petty Sessions, and is now comprised in the north division of the county, the remainder of the Hundred being in the south division, with the Appletree, Morleston and Litchurch, and Repton and Gresley Hundreds, for which the polling places are Derby, Heanor, Ashbourn, Wirksworth, Melbourn, Belper, and Swadlincote; and those for the north division, Buxton, Alfreton, Bakewell, Castleton, Chapel-en-le-Frith, Chesterfield, Glossop, Tideswell, and Eckington. This Hundred contains 77,659 statute acres of land. The northern side of this Hundred partakes of the same features as the High Peak, though not quite so mountainous, and is often designated the Low Peak. It is noted as being almost the first seat of the cotton manufacture, (See Cromford,) for its warm baths at Matlock, its numerous caverns and picturesque dales—particularly Dovedale,—and the rich mineral field at its northern extremity. The southern side is more an agricultural district of fertile land with a variety of soils, principally a red loam on various substrata, and chiefly occupied in dairy farms, many of which are large.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Moorlands in the County of Staffordshire
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 114 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY C OMl'vlI SSI UN FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB,KB£. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin,QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholm* Sir Andrew WheaUey,CBE. Mr P B Young, CBE. To the Rt H0n Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS IN THE COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial.review of the electoral arrangements for the District of Staffordshire Moorlands in accordance with the requirements .of section 6? of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 6o(l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 3 June 197^ that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, copies of which were circulated to the Staffordshire County Council, Parish Councils and Parish Meetings in the district, the Member of Parliament for the constituency concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • “Counting Our Heritage” – an Example of How Local Authorities Can Use Volunteers
    “Counting our heritage” – an example of how local authorities can use volunteers Richard Tuffrey How do we assess the condition of our heritage assets? • In the order of 500,000 listed buildings in England (Historic England) • Of these, approximately 92% (460,000) are listed as Grade II (Historic England) • From 2006-2017, number of specialist heritage staff employed in local government declined from approx. 800 FTE to 500 FTE – a fall of approx. 38% (IHBC) Counting our heritage • One of 19 pilot schemes arranged by English Heritage in 2013 • Objective to test the practicality of working with non- professional volunteers to carry out a survey of all Grade II listed buildings • Project ran across the whole of High Peak and Staffordshire Moorlands (outside the National Park) Counting our heritage The process Remember: • Volunteers are acting as agents of the Council and so the same duty of care applies to both them and the public: o Act in professional manner o Health and safety • Owners of properties can be understandably suspicious: o Why is the Council undertaking the survey? o Why are volunteers being used? How: • Advertised the survey in the local press and contacted known sources of potential volunteers • Alert owners that the survey is taking place • Appoint suitably experienced consultant to act as Project Managers • Issue volunteers with: • Identifying lanyard • Letter of introduction from the Council and a point of contact back in the office • Hi vis jacket • Series of training events held: o Introduction to the project and why it is being undertaken o Introduction to ‘heritage assets’ and ‘assets at risk’ o Covered all relevant aspects of health and safety o Limitations of access for reasons of insurance cover o What to do if challenged o Volunteers allowed to choose an area to focus on o Practical example • Fieldwork o Issued with lots of 10 properties at a time o Encouraged to record everything digitally and email responses o Project team moderated results to ensure consistency between Volunteers 2 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 1 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Framlington Longhorsley Lowick Matfen Middleton Milfield Netherton Netherwitton N° L 82 / 70 Journal Officiel Des Communautés Européennes 26
    26 . 3 . 84 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N° L 82 / 67 DIRECTIVE DU CONSEIL du 28 février 1984 relative à la liste communautaire des zones agricoles défavorisées au sens de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE ( Royaume-Uni ) ( 84 / 169 / CEE ) LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES , considérant que les indices suivants , relatifs à la pré­ sence de terres peu productives visée à l'article 3 para­ graphe 4 point a ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été retenus pour la détermination de chacune des zones en vu le traité instituant la Communauté économique question : part de la superficie herbagère par rapport à européenne, la superficie agricole utile supérieure à 70 % , densité animale inférieure à l'unité de gros bétail ( UGB ) à l'hectare fourrager et montants des fermages ne dépas­ sant pas 65 % de la moyenne nationale ; vu la directive 75 / 268 / CEE du Conseil , du 28 avril 1975 , sur l'agriculture de montagne et de certaines zones défavorisées ( 2 ), modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 82 / 786 / CEE ( 2 ), et notamment son article 2 considérant que les résultats économiques des exploi­ tations sensiblement inférieurs à la moyenne , visés paragraphe 2 , à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point b ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été démontrés par le fait que le revenu du travail ne dépasse pas 80 % de la moyenne vu la proposition de la Commission , nationale ; considérant que , pour établir la faible densité de la vu l'avis de l'Assemblée ( 3 ), population visée à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point c ) de la directive 75
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly List of Applications Validated by the Authority
    Peak District National Park Authority Aldern House, Baslow Road, Bakewell, Derbyshire, DE45 1AE Telephone number : 01629 816200 WEEKLY LIST OF APPLICATIONS VALIDATED BY THE AUTHORITY Applications validated between 01/03/2017 - 07/03/2017 Application Number: Name & Address: Agent Name P Number: Location: & Address: Proposal: Parish: Appl. type: Grid Ref.: Case Worker: NP/DDD/0317/0233 Mr Corbridge and Miss Alderson Oldfield Design FULL 421299 ALN P 11737 367498 Shutts Farm Holme Bank Studio Constraints Shutts Lane Holme Lane, Bakewell BAKEWELL Ranger Area - Derbyshire Neighbourhood Planning Area - DE451GF Landscape Character Type - FCE Landholding - DESCRIPTION Proposed erection of local need affordable dwelling. PARISH Bakewell View Documents NP/SM/0317/0209 Mr Geoffry Barber Anthony Short & Partners LBA 413826 ALN P 10871 LLP 349379 Blore Hall 34 Church Street Constraints Yerley Hill Ashbourne Blore Derbyshire Ranger Area - DE6 11AE Landscape Character Type - Heritage Asset - DESCRIPTION Listed Building consent - Addition of 2 No small single storey stone porches to holiday units 6 and 7 within the curtilage of the Grade II Listed Blore Hall PARISH Blore With Swinscoe View Documents NP/DDD/0317/0220 Mr J and Mrs J Meakin John Church Planning S73 421606 AAJK P 9922 Consultancy Ltd 376608 The White House and Victoria Buildings Constraints Butchers Cottage 117 High Street Main Road Clay Cross Ranger Area - Eyam CHESTERFIELD Landscape Character Type - Derbyshire FCE Landholding - S45 9DZ Conservation Area - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - Ranger Area - Landscape Character Type - FCE Landholding - Conservation Area - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - DESCRIPTION Section 73 application for the removal of condition 2 from planning consent NP/DDD/0416/0367 PARISH Eyam View Documents WEEKLY LIST OF APPLICATIONS VALIDATED BY THE AUTHORITY Applications validated between 01/03/2017 - 07/03/2017 Application Number: Name & Address: Agent Name P Number: Location: & Address: Proposal: Parish: Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Consultation
    PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY: LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CORE STRATEGY PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION STATEMENT September 2010 1 Peak District National Park Authority Member of the English National Park Authorities Association (ENPAA) Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1AE Tel: (01629) 816 200 Text: (01629) 816 319 Fax: (01629) 816 310 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.peakdistrict.gov.uk This and other Local Development Framework documents can be made available in large copy print, audio cassette, Braille or languages other than English. If you require the document in one of these formats please contact: Brian Taylor, Policy Planning Manager, Peak District National Park at the address above, Tel: 01629 816303, or email [email protected]. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Preliminary consultation on Issues, 2004 6 3 ‘Help Shape the Future’ consultation, 2005 8 4 Issues and Options consultation, 2007 10 5 Further consultation on Issues and Options, 2008 12 6 Refined Options consultation, 2009 14 7 Preferred Approaches consultation, 2009 15 8 Consultation under Regulation 27 16 Appendices: 1 Who we consulted on ‘Help Shape the Future’ 17 2 Key points arising from ‘Help Shape the Future’ consultation 22 3 Who we consulted on Issues and Options 25 4 Deposit locations and public libraries 29 5 Key points from Issues and Options consultation and how these were 30 addressed in Refined Options 6 Who we consulted in later stages 33 7 Key issues from Refined Options consultation and how these were 36 addressed in selecting Preferred Approaches 8 Key points from Preferred Approaches consultation and how these were 42 addressed in the Submission Core Strategy 9 Policy development through Refined Options - Preferred Options - 48 Submission version 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage and Impact Statement Blore Hall
    Anthony Short and Partners LLP 34 Church Street Ashbourne Derbyshire DE6 1AE ___________________________________________________________________________ HERITAGE AND IMPACT STATEMEN T BLORE HALL DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED 2 NEW SINGLE STOREY FAMILY UNITS [With reference to Drawings: B20-09, B20-10, B20-11, B20-12, B20-13] 1.0 Background This document is a Heritage and Impact Statement prepared by Anthony Short and Partners LLP on behalf of our client Holiday Property Bond (HPB), with guidance from Historic England: The Setting of Heritage Assets (2015). The purpose of this statement is to assess the significance and impact on the heritage assets of Blore Hall, the church and the landscape and setting of the surrounding area by the creation of two additional family units within the HPB Bloor Hall development. 2.0 Site Location Blore is a remote village within the parish of Blore and Swinscoe, situated about four miles to the north west of Ashbourne, just south of Ilam near to Dovedale and the Derbyshire border (P1). P1 Blore Hall is situated within the village. The hall and associated buildings were converted to holiday accommodation in 1990. HPB bought the converted property in 1996 and have been used extensively by holidaymakers since 1998 when the first bookings were taken. 3.0 Historic and Arc hitectural Significance 3.1 ‘In the Domesday Survey of 1086 Blore is recorded as ‘Blora’ and belonged to Robert de Stafford. The manor was tenanted at that time by Edric. Within the manor there was enough land for five ploughs to till. The population consisted of four freemen and two villeins, or tenants who held land in return for labour services.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire. Leek
    DIRECfORY .] STAFFORDSHIRE. LEEK. 231 Petty Sessions are held at the Town ball, Market street, School of Art, Science & Technology, O}len September every alternate wednesday, at II a. m. &i at the Clerk's to July as per detailed programme, to be obtained free office, IO Derby street, Leek, daily (except on satur­ at the Institute, containing time-table, subjects, fees day), at II a.m. &i at the Public hall, Bradley &c. &c. Subscription Library (Book Cluh) ss. per Green, the second monday in every month at II a.m. year; open at all times when the library is open The places in the petty sessional division !!re : Alstone­ Leek Urban District Council Officials, Kineton Parkes, field, Biddulph, Blore-with-Swinscoe, Bradnop, Butter­ principal of Nicholson Institute; William Craigmile, ton, Calton, Cheddleton-with-Basford, Endon &i Stanley, head maste:r of school of art Fawfieldhead, Foxt, Grindon, Heathylee, Heaton, Hol­ Public Baths, 65 Derby street, James Olulow, supt linsclough, Horton, llam & Throwley, Ipstones, Leek, Stamp Office, Derby street, Aa.ron Ostler, distributor Leek Frith, Longsdon, Longnor, Lowe, Onecote, Quam­ Temperance Hall, Union street, Geo. Hy. Bowers, sec ford, Rudyard, Rushton James, Rushton Spencer, Town Hall, George Green, keeper Sheen, Tittesworth, Warslow &i E:kstones, Waterfall, Weighing Machine Offices, Derby street, J Ghn Ed ward W etton & W oodhouses Counsell, clerk PUBLIC ESTABLISHMENTS. VOLUN~E:ERS. Catholic Institute of the Blessed Virgin, King street, Mrs. rst Volunteer Battalion (The Prince of Wales's) North Elizabeth Haslam, lady superior Staffordshire Regiment (I Co. ), head quarters, Ca~-.. Cemetery, Compton, Charles Henshaw, registrar; Eli market, Capt.
    [Show full text]