DOCSLIB.ORG

“Counting Our Heritage” – an Example of How Local Authorities Can Use Volunteers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Counting Our Heritage” – an Example of How Local Authorities Can Use Volunteers “Counting our heritage” – an example of how local authorities can use volunteers Richard Tuffrey How do we assess the condition of our heritage assets? • In the order of 500,000 listed buildings in England (Historic England) • Of these, approximately 92% (460,000) are listed as Grade II (Historic England) • From 2006-2017, number of specialist heritage staff employed in local government declined from approx. 800 FTE to 500 FTE – a fall of approx. 38% (IHBC) Counting our heritage • One of 19 pilot schemes arranged by English Heritage in 2013 • Objective to test the practicality of working with non- professional volunteers to carry out a survey of all Grade II listed buildings • Project ran across the whole of High Peak and Staffordshire Moorlands (outside the National Park) Counting our heritage The process Remember: • Volunteers are acting as agents of the Council and so the same duty of care applies to both them and the public: o Act in professional manner o Health and safety • Owners of properties can be understandably suspicious: o Why is the Council undertaking the survey? o Why are volunteers being used? How: • Advertised the survey in the local press and contacted known sources of potential volunteers • Alert owners that the survey is taking place • Appoint suitably experienced consultant to act as Project Managers • Issue volunteers with: • Identifying lanyard • Letter of introduction from the Council and a point of contact back in the office • Hi vis jacket • Series of training events held: o Introduction to the project and why it is being undertaken o Introduction to ‘heritage assets’ and ‘assets at risk’ o Covered all relevant aspects of health and safety o Limitations of access for reasons of insurance cover o What to do if challenged o Volunteers allowed to choose an area to focus on o Practical example • Fieldwork o Issued with lots of 10 properties at a time o Encouraged to record everything digitally and email responses o Project team moderated results to ensure consistency between Volunteers 2 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 1 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 4. CONDITION HERITAGE AT RISK SURVEY FORM Building elements Good Fair Poor Very bad Chimneys Please complete one form for each building/structure (even if the listing covers more than one building/structure) Roofs Rainwater goods 1. BUILDING DETAILS Wall structure Doors and windows Designated site name Architectural details Building name Walls, gates & railings Street number Other (specify) Street name Good Fair Poor Very bad Locality OVERALL CONDITION Civil parish See definitions on page 4 District / Borough County Postcode Other comments on building condition National Grid Reference Region List Entry Number 5. OCCUPANCY 6. RISK ASSESSMENT Occupied / In use Low Risk / Not At Risk 2. BUILDING TYPE Partly occupied / Partly in use Vulnerable Building type - original Vacant / Not in use At Risk Building type – N/A Use diagram on page 4 current/last known use Unknown 3. OWNER TYPE (tick all relevant) Charity - heritage Charity - other 7. SURVEY INFORMATION Commercial company Educational - independent North elevation East elevation South elevation West elevation Educational - state sector English Heritage Photographs Government Health Date taken Other not for profit Local Authority community/voluntary groups Date of site visit Private Religious organisation Date of assessment (if different Unknown Multiple owners (tick all relevant) from above) Other (specify) Assessed by 2 1 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 3 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 4 APPENDIX A BUILDING USES OR TYPES APPENDIX C DEFINITIONS OF BUILDING CONDITION AGRICULTURAL – Barn, stable, pigsty, outbuilding GOOD: Structurally sound; weathertight; no significant repairs needed. ANCILLARY – Outbuilding, wall, garden building, FAIR: Structurally sound; in need of minor repair; showing no signs of a lack of COMMERCIAL – Bank, office, post office, public house, shop, retail warehouse, market hall general maintenance. GOVERNMENT – Town hall, hall, government office, POOR: Deteriorating masonry; leaking roof; defective rainwater goods; usually INDUSTRIAL – Factory, mill, warehouse, watermill, windmill, brewery accompanied by rot outbreaks; general deterioration of most elements of the building fabric, including external joinery; or where there has been a LEISURE – Cinema, theatre, museum, swimming baths, fire or other disaster which has affected part of the building. RELIGIOUS – Church, chapel, mosque, temple, lychgate VERY BAD: Structural failure or clear signs of structural instability; loss of significant RESIDENTIAL – House, flat or apartment, farmhouse, lodge, hotel areas of the roof covering, leading to major deterioration of the interior; or PUBLIC BUILDING – School, library, hospital, workhouse, institute, courthouse, prison, where there has been a major fire or other disaster affecting most of the STREET FURNITURE & MONUMENTS – Milepost, statue, cross, sculpture building. UTILITY – Bridge, station, lock, sub-station, viaduct, aquaduct, pumping station APPENDIX D ENGLISH HERITAGE RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B CONDITION OF MAIN BUILDING ELEMENTS BUILDING ELEMENT DEFECTS TO LOOK OUT FOR Pots missing; visible lean; flashings defective or missing; eroded Chimneys mortar joints; defective masonry – cracks, spalling, etc. Roof Individual roof covering elements: loss, displacement or damage Rainwater goods: debris collected/blocked, overflows Rainwater disposal Rainwater goods: cracked or leaking Perimeter drainage channel: debris collected Below ground drainage: clogged with debris Copings or parapets defective or missing Masonry wall cracked or visibly leaning; eroded masonry elements; eroded masonry joints Wall Structure Vegetative growth; ventilation grilles, air bricks or louvres obstructed; trees or vegetation close to walls; evidence of root damage to walls Timber frame members decayed or rotten; rendered or daubed panels cracked or eroded Window panes broken or missing; window frames, doors or fascia THIS FORM IS AVAILABLE IN OTHER FORMATS, IF REQUIRED. Doors and windows boards decayed, rotten or in need of decoration FOR DETAILS PLEASE CONTACT Architectural details Eroded or cracked surfaces; damaged or missing elements URBAN VISION NORTH STAFFORDSHIRE, SCHOOL OF ART, QUEEN Walls, gates and Damaged or missing elements; eroded surfaces; in need of STREET, BURSLEM, STOKE-ON-TRENT ST6 3EJ, decoration railings TELEPHONE NO: 01782 790595 ! 3 4 HERITAGE AT RISK SURVEY RESULTS HIGH PEAK Buildings List Entries List Entries List Entries Surveyed Not Surveyed Surveyed At Risk Vulnerable Not At Risk Surveyors (List entries surveyed) Photographs Buxton 94 93 1 93 5 8 80 Phil Jones (22); Judith Hubble (20); David Morten (26); Janet Byers (25) Chapel-en-le-Frith 56 56 0 56 4 3 49 Mike Smith (17); Guy Martin (22); Jocelyn Street (17) Charlesworth 7 5 1 6 0 0 5 Judith Hubble (6) Chinley, Buxworth & Brownside 17 17 0 17 1 0 16 Richard Hubble (17) Chisworth 6 5 1 5 0 0 5 Adrian Lyne (5) Glossop 84 118 0 84 4 11 103 Adrian Lyne (34); Frank Ackley (14) ; Mike Tomlinson (1); Phil Teece (18); Linda Newman (14); Phil Ashley (3) Green Fairfield 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 Phil Ashley (1) Hartington Upper Quarter 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 Phil Ashley (2) Hayfield 25 26 2 23 0 2 24 Phil Ashley (23) King Sterndale 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 Phil Jones (1) New Mills 62 56 6 56 1 5 50 John Pritchard (26); Francis Worsley (18); Phil Jones (9); David Morten (3) Tintwistle 3 7 0 3 0 0 7 Adrian Lyne (3) Whaley Bridge 20 20 0 20 1 3 16 John Pritchard (20) Total = 378 407 11 367 19 32 356 97.09% 4.67% 7.86% 87.47% STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS Buildings List Entries List Entries List Entries Surveyed Not Surveyed Surveyed At Risk Vulnerable Not At Risk Surveyors Alton 55 25 30 25 2 5 18 Mel Trafford (9); Rachel Trafford (10); David Slade (6) Bagnall 17 19 0 17 1 2 16 John Newall (17) Biddulph 50 23 27 23 0 2 21 Hilda Sheldon (14); Helen Roberts (9) Blore with Swinscoe 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 Bradnop 9 5 5 4 0 1 4 Brown Edge 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 Caverswall 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 Cheadle 71 69 2 69 1 4 64 Alan Wigley (22) ; Mike Plant (22); John Smith (25) Checkley 52 0 52 0 0 0 0 Cheddleton 75 54 22 53 8 10 36 Chris Hesketh (27); Joan Bennett (28) Consall 9 6 2 7 1 1 4 Faith Cleverdon (6) Cotton 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 Dilhorne 18 17 1 17 3 4 10 John Sambrook (17) Draycott in the Moors 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 Endon and Stanley 45 47 4 41 3 21 23 John Sambrook (23); Cath Walton (17); Faith Cleverdon (5) Farley 50 0 50 0 0 0 0 Forsbrook 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 Heaton 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 Horton 26 17 9 17 2 3 12 Rob Ford (6); Lee Whittaker (11) Ipstones 89 56 33 56 4 10 42 Brian Forrester (19); Alison Lee (23); Fred Edgerton (10); Janet Nash (4) Kingsley 48 0 48 0 0 0 0 Leek 134 107 45 89 4 13 90 Faith Cleverdon (24); Liz Rhodes (22); Roger Warrilow (24); Michael Stapleton(19) Leekfrith 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 Rob Ford (4) Longsdon 18 9 9 9 0 0 9 Lee Whittaker (7) Oakamoor 14 5 9 5 1 0 4 David Slade (5) Rushton 27 21 6 21 1 2 18 Margaret Mullins (12); Dorothy Kay (12) Tittesworth 6 5 1 5 0 2 3 Rob Ford (4) Waterhouses 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 Werrington 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 Total = 895 489 433 462 31 80 378 51.62% 6.34% 16.36% 77.30% Total Buildings = 1273 896 444 829 5.58% 12.50% 81.92% 65.12% Counting our heritage Results • Nearly 1,200 Grade II listed buildings across the two districts • 41 volunteers came forward • Wide range of skills and experience from conservation accredited architects through to unskilled enthusiasts • Work undertaken between May to August 2013 • High Peak: 377 out of 378 list entries were surveyed – 99% - 24 each • Staffs Moorlands: 462 out of 895 list entries were surveyed – 52% - 18 each • Combined: 839 out of 1273 list entries were surveyed – 66% - 20 each • Pilots nationally: Approx.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Peak District Northern Counties Annual Report for 1966
    The Peak District and Northern Counties FOOTPATHS PRESERVATION SOCIETY ---------- 1894-1966 --- - - - ·: -=--~ · · · .. :-~- ·-=- . - -=-:.-=----=-- .=-:. -·-· - -- ~ . ··· ~ · - . - ~ - - ~-- ... Annual Report for 1966 THE PEAK DISTRICT AND NORTHERN COUNTIES FOOTPATHS PRESERVATION SOCIETY Founded in 1894 President : F. S. H. HEAD, Ph.D., D.Sc. Vice-Presidents : The Rt. Hon. LORD CHORLEY, M.A., J.P. .P. DALEY A. J. MOON, B.A. (Cantab.) A. SMirrH H. E. WILD COUNCIL Elected Members : Dr. F. S. H. Head (Chairman) H. Gillia.t, L. G. Meadowcroft ( Vice-Chairmen) D. Baflr N . R. F . Hiles Miss M. E. Price Dr. A. J. Ba.teman J. H. Holness Miss B. Rowland Dr. W. F. Beech Mis-s R. Irlam E. E. Stubbs D. T. Berwick D. w. Lee · V. J. Simson J. W. Butterworth Miss N. Melior W. Whalley K. E. Bracewell A. Milner Mrs. Wilson C. H. Chadwick A. 0. Bnien Footpaths Inspectors : N. Redford (Chief) MI"s. E. A. EVlis10n J. Parsons J. Cookson A. Hodkiinson P. J. Thornton G. R. Estill D. W. Lee F. Wood A. E. Nash Delegates from Affiliated Clubs and Societies : D. P. Bailey E. F. Hawluidge G. Ta~'lor J. G. Baker J. B. Johnston J. Ta,ylor F. Barlow F. R. Mason H. Thistlethwaite Mrs. M. Barratt P. Newton Mrs. J. E. Want J. C. Bradbwy J . Ogden P. A. Tre'V'O!f H. Cook MTs. B. Preston Miss J. Ward-Oldham A. D. Baton P. Scholes J. Willison Mrs. E. A. Evison Miss A. Smalley Miss E. Woo.hley G. Fernley Mrs. J. S1bJey F. J. E. Young F. Goff P. Smith M~ss S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 in the County of Lancaster
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3 JUNE, 1924. 4447 In the county of Lancaster. 8. An Area comprising: — The county boroughs of St. Helens and In the county of Gloucester. Warrington. The borough of Leigh. The petty sessional division of Campden. The petty sessional division of Warrington, In the county of Oxford. and The parishes of Claydon, Clattercote, The parishes of Bold, Ashton-in-Makerfield, Mollington, Copredy, Bourton, Hamwell, Abram, Lowton, Kenyon, and Culcheth. Horley, Hornton, Wroxton, Dray ton, North Newington, East Shutford, West Shutford, In the county of Salop. Swalcliffe, Sibford Ferris, Sibford Gower, The borough of Oswestry. Epwell, Shenington, and Alkerton. The petty sessional division of Oswestry, and In the county of Northampton. The parishes of Ellesmere Rural, Bllesmere The borough of Daventry. Urban, Welshampton, Whitchurch Rural, Whitchurch Urban, Ightfield, and Ruyton of The petty sessional division of Daventry, the Eleven Towns. and The parishes of Upper Boddington, Lower In the county of Denbigh. Boddington, Bugbrooke, Kislingbury, Upton, The borough of Wrexham, and Harpole, Upper Heyford, Nether Hey ford, The petty sessional divisions of Bromfield, Floore, Brington, Althorp, Harlestone, Church liuabon, and Brampton, Chapel Brampton, Spratton, Holdenby, East Haddon, Ravensthorpe, The parish of Chirk. Teeton, Great Creaton, Cottesbrooke, Hollo- In the county of Flint. well, Coton, Guilsborough, Thornby, Cold The petty sessional divisions of Hope, and Ashby, Welford, Sulby, Hothorpe, Marston Overton, and the detached part of the petty Trussell, Sibertoft, Olipston, Naseby, Hasel- sessional division of Hawarden. bech, Kelmarsh, and Maidwell. 6. An Area comprising: — In the county of Worcester. In the couniy of Stafford. The borough of Stourbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire 30Undar Es W Th Cheshire Derbyshire Wa Rw Ckshiir and Refg Rid an D Worcester Local
    No. 5H2 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties. COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE 30UNDAR ES W TH CHESHIRE DERBYSHIRE WA RW CKSHIIR AND REFG RID AN D WORCESTER LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOH ENGLAND RETORT NO •5112 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany PATTEN.PPD THE RT. HON. CHRIS PATTEN HP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE: BOUNDARIES WITH CHESHIRE, DERBYSHIRE,. WARWICKSHIRE, AND HEREFORD AND WORCESTER COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Staffordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Staffordshire, and in the adjoining counties of Cheshire, Derbyshire, West Midlands, Shropshire, Warwickshire, Hereford and Worcester and Leicestershire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; regional health authorities; public utilities in the area; the English Tourist Board; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle; and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to co-operate as necessary with each other, and with the District Councils concerned, to assist us in publicising the start of the review, by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • N C C Newc Coun Counc Jo Castle Ncil a Cil St Oint C E-Und Nd S Tatem
    Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council Statement of Community Involvement Joint Consultation Report July 2015 Table of Contents Introduction Page 3 Regulations Page 3 Consultation Page 3 How was the consultation on Page 3 the Draft Joint SCI undertaken and who was consulted Main issues raised in Page 7 consultation responses on Draft Joint SCI Main changes made to the Page 8 Draft Joint SCI Appendices Page 12 Appendix 1 Copy of Joint Page 12 Press Release Appendix 2 Summary list of Page 14 who was consulted on the Draft SCI Appendix 3 Draft SCI Page 31 Consultation Response Form Appendix 4 Table of Page 36 Representations, officer response and proposed changes 2 Introduction This Joint Consultation Report sets out how the consultation on the Draft Newcastle-under- Lyme Borough Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) was undertaken, who was consulted, a summary of main issues raised in the consultation responses and a summary of how these issues have been considered. The SCI was adopted by Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council on the 15th July 2015 and by Stoke-on-Trent City Council on the 9th July 2015. Prior to adoption, Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council and Stoke-on-Trent City Council respective committees and Cabinets have considered the documents. Newcastle-under- Lyme Borough Council’s Planning Committee considered a report on the consultation responses and suggested changes to the SCI on the 3RD June 2015 and recommended a grammatical change at paragraph 2.9 (replacing the word which with who) and this was reported to DMPG on the 9th June 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • STAJ.I":FORDSHIHE. FAR 719
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] STAJ.i":FORDSHIHE. FAR 719 Clowes R. Meg crofts, Ipstones, Stoke Cooper Lewis, Milton, Stoke Cotton Joseph, Milwich, Stone Clowes Richard, Great Brookhouse, Cooper Stephen, Watling st. Brown- Cotton Robert, Great Gate, Stoke Eaves, Bucknal!, Stoke hills, Walsall Cotton Thomas, Freehay, Stoke Clowes Robert, Home meadow, Kings- Cooper Thomas, .Alsagers bank, Hal- Cotton William Frederick, Brans- ley, Stoke mer End, Newcastle combe, Stretton, Burton Clowes SI. Green hill, lpstones, Stoke Cooper Thomas, jun. Betley, Crewe Cotton William Henry, Stretton,Burtn Clowes Samuel, Wootton, .A.shbourne Cooper Thomas, SPabridg-e, Newcastle Cottrell Caleb, Yeatshall, Abbot's Clowes William, Biddulph, Congleton Cooper Thomas, Upper Haye corner, Bromley, Rugeley Clowes Wm. Common, Waterfall,Leek Fawfieldhead, Buxton Cottrell Clement, Marlpits farm, Clowes Wm. Hay ho. Ipstones, Stoke Cooper Thos. Yoxall, Burton-on Trent Bagot's Bromley, Uttoxeter Clowes William, Kingsley, S·toke Cooper William, A.udley, Newcastle Cottrell J. Pershall, Eccleshall R.S.O Clowes William, Leese Hill farm, Cooper William, Calf Heath, Four CottreliJ.Whitemoor, Biddulph,Cngltn Kingstone, Uttoxeter R.S.O Ashes, Wolverhampton Cottrell Joseph, Fradswell, Stafford Clowes William, Stockley park, Tut- Cooper William, Eardley End, Nwcstl Cottrell T. Pershall, Eccleshall R.S.O bury, Burton Cooper Zeedock, Up. Elkstone, Buxton Cottrell 'l'uomas, Biddulph, Congleton Clullow John William, Meadows farm, Cope C. & J. Haysgate, Fawfieldhead, Cottrill Ralph, Bagnall, Stoke Upper Elkstone, Buxton Buxton Coulson S. Hamstall Ridware, Rugely Clulow John & Peter, Alderlee, Leek Cope Arthur, Essington Wood, Es- Coulson Samuel, Whitehouse farm, Frith, Leek sington, Wolverhampton Swinfen, Weeford, Lichfield Clulow J. Broad lee, Leek Frith,Leek Cope Arthur Fred, Blackhalves lane, Coulton Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Options Consultation Booklet
    Site Options Consultation Booklet Staffordshire Moorlands Site Allocations - July 2015 Site Options Consultation Booklet Foreword For further information relating to this document, or for a large copy print, audio cassette, Braille or other language version, please contact: Forward Plans, Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Regeneration Services, Moorlands House Stockwell Street, Leek ST13 6HQ Tel: 01538 395570 Email: [email protected] Staffordshire Moorlands Site Allocations - July 2015 1 Site Options Consultation Booklet Part A 6 Consultation details and how to make comments 8 Part B 11 1 Introduction 12 2 Towns 14 Leek 16 Biddulph 20 Cheadle 23 3 Town Centre Maps 29 4 Larger Villages 34 4.1 Alton 35 4.2 Biddulph Moor 37 4.3 Blythe Bridge and Forsbrook 39 4.4 Brown Edge 41 4.5 Cheddleton 43 4.6 Endon 46 4.7 Ipstones 48 4.8 Kingsley 50 4.9 Upper Tean 52 4.10 Waterhouses 54 4.11 Werrington and Cellarhead 56 4.12 Wetley Rocks 58 Staffordshire Moorlands Site Allocations - July 2015 Site Options Consultation Booklet 5 Smaller Villages 61 5.1 Bagnall 63 5.2 Blackshaw Moor 65 5.3 Boundary 67 5.4 Bradnop 69 5.5 Caverswall and Cookshill 71 5.6 Checkley 73 5.7 Consall 75 5.8 Cotton 77 5.9 Dilhorne 79 5.10 Draycott 81 5.11 Foxt 83 5.12 Froghall 85 5.13 Heaton 87 5.14 Hollington 89 5.15 Hulme 91 5.16 Kingsley Holt 93 5.17 Leekbrook 95 5.18 Longsdon 97 5.19 Lower Tean 99 5.20 Meerbrook 101 5.21 Oakamoor 103 5.22 Rudyard 105 5.23 Rushton Spencer 107 5.24 Stanley 109 5.25 Stockton Brook 111 5.26 Swinscoe 113 5.27 Whiston 115
    [Show full text]
  • Mins-June 2020
    BAGNALL PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of Meeting June 2020 Bagnall Village Hall School Road Bagnall Staffordshire Moorlands Present: Cllr Andrew Batson (Chair) Cllr Les Knowles Cllr Sally Brown Cllr Peter Lawley Cllr David Pearson Cllr Sybil Relphs Cllr Roger Jackson In attendance: Denise Cooper (Clerk) Apologies No apologies received. Minutes of the Previous Meeting The minutes for June, having been distributed to Councillors via email and displayed on our website, will be verified at the next adjourned meeting if deemed to be a true and accurate record and duly signed by the Chair. Declaration of Personal / Pecuniary Interest Cllrs Peter Lawley and Les Knowles declared an interest in correspondence received seeking permission to use the playing field for Pilates and therefore took no part on decisions reached. Cllr Pearson declared an interest in issues associated with Footpath 28. Adjournment of meeting for public comments and concerns As actual meetings have been suspended due to the Coronavirus / Corvid-19 there are no Parishioners’ concerns. District Councillor Reports (as at 15 June 2020) . A phased approach to the opening of Children’s Centres is being undertaken. Visitor numbers are still high at our country parks and priority is focused on opening the toilet facilities wherever practical and safe to do so. Plans are now in place to begin the phased re-opening of libraries. A number of Black Lives Matter protests have taken place across Staffordshire; all have been peaceful to date and Staffordshire Police continue to work with organisers to ensure this continues and that people practise social distancing where possible. Regional and mobile Covid-19 testing centres are now operational and provide good coverage across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Studies on the Derbyshire Dome D
    SEISMIC STUDIES ON THE DERBYSHIRE DOME DAVID EDWARD ROGERS A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences The University Leeds LS2 9JT February 1983 PhD Thesis February1983 SEISMIC STUDIES ON THE DERBYSHIRE DOME D. E. ROGERS Dept Earth Sciences ABSTRACT The Derbyshire Dome is thought to have been a stable uplifted area since at least Lower Carboniferous times. This project is principally concerned with four 30km seismic refraction lines which crossed the limestone outcrop of Derbyshire and N. Staffordshire in order to investigate the Dome's upper crustal structure, using quarry blasts as seismic sources. A time-term analysis of refracted arrival data defined basement structure more complicated than implied by the surface geology. The interpretation of these data was complicated by high (5.6-5.8km/s) velocity refractions from dolomitic horizons within the limestone sequence; the mean overburden velocity was determined to be about 5.2 km/s. The Dome could be divided into two pre-Carboniferous geological units separated approx- imately by the line of the NNW trending Bonsall Fault. To the north a broadly domal refractor of velocity 5.5-5.55km/s was mapped, and thought to correlate with both the shallow pre- Carboniferous volcanics encountered by the Woo Dale borehole and"the Ordovician shales encountered by the Eyam borehole below 1.8km of limestone. This refractor accordingly deepens beneath the Carboniferous sedimentary basins flanking the Dome. To the south of the Bonsall Fault zone, the Carbonifer- ous was found to be underlain by a refractor of velocity 5.63-5.7km/s, thought to be of Precambrian material similar to the rocks of Charnwood Forest, Leicestershire, some 40km south.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire. (Kelly's
    694 FAR STAFFORDSHIRE. (KELLY'S FA.HMERS-continned, Wilkins W. H. Huddlesford, Whitting- Woddi!l.'ie T. Hope, Alstonfield, A~.hbrne \Vhieldon William, Gravelly bank, Hol- ton, Lic:hfield Wood .A. Loxley, Uttoxeter S.O. lington, Stafford WC.lkinson Hy. R. Tyrley castle, Alrn- Wood C. Clmthill, Longdon, Ruge{ley Whieldon William, Ipstones, Stoke ington, Market Drayton Wood Enoch, Litley Huntl~y, Stoke Whilock Wm. Forsbrook, Stoke Wilkinson John,, Rangemore, Burton Wood George, Eaves, Whiston, Stoke Whilton Mrs. M . .Acton Trussell,Stffd Williinson R.S. Chapel Chorlton,Nwcstl Wood! Geo. Finney grn. Madeley Heath Whiston Joseph, Moorleigh heath, Mid- Wilkinson Thos. Biddulph, Oongleton Wood Jas. Alder:> brook, Rocester S.O dleton Green, Stoke Wilkinson W. F. Gt. Madeley, Nwcstle Wood J.Reap's moor,Fawfieldhead,Bxtn Whiston M. Mucklestone, Mrkt. Drytn Wilder Miss Elizh. Pl.ardiwick, Staffrd Wood John, lliaycott, Derby Whiston Samuel. Gutter lane, Bid. Willetts Geo.Abbot's Bromley,Rugeley Wood John, Ella.stone, Ashborne dulph, Cong!eton Willialll.8 Willia.rn & John, Ga.rsh.all Wood John, Grartton, Stoke Whistou Wm. Saverley Green, Stoke gr~en, !Milwich, Stone Wood J.Latherfu-d. Shareshill,W'hptn Whitaker Thomas, Turner's pool, vVilliams David, Milwich, Stone Wood Jn. Mare dol~, Sheen, .Ashbrn.e Leek l<'rith, Stoke Willi[Ll11s Edward, Moreton park, 1 WOO'd J. R~dge, l''awfieJdhead, Buxton White William & Francis, Caste m, Moreton. Newport (S-alop) Wood J oS€ph, Up. Eili.stone, .Ashbrne Wetton, Ashborne Willia.ms Miss Elizabeth, Hinksford, Wood Joshua, Clough head, Hollins- White Charles, Beech, Newcastle Swind0111, Dudley clough, Buxton White Elijah, Oulton, Newport (Salop) Willia.ms George, Ellenha.ll park, Ellen- •Wood Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire 1
    Entries in red - require a photograph STAFFORDSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position ST_ABCD06 SK 1077 4172 B5032 EAST STAFFORDSHIRE DENSTONE Quixhill Bank, between Quixhill & B5030 jct on the verge ST_ABCD07 SK 0966 4101 B5032 EAST STAFFORDSHIRE DENSTONE Denstone in hedge ST_ABCD09 SK 0667 4180 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALTON W of Gallows Green on the verge ST_ABCD10 SK 0541 4264 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALTON near Peakstones Inn, Alton Common by hedge ST_ABCD11 SK 0380 4266 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Threapwood in hedge ST_ABCD11a SK 0380 4266 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Threapwood in hedge behind current maker ST_ABCD12 SK 0223 4280 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Lightwood, E of Cheadle in hedge ST_ABCK10 SK 0776 3883 UC road EAST STAFFORDSHIRE CROXDEN Woottons, between Hollington & Rocester on the verge ST_ABCK11 SK 0617 3896 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHECKLEY E of Hollington in front of wood & wire fence ST_ABCK12 SK 0513 3817 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHECKLEY between Fole and Hollington in hedge Lode Lane, 100m SE of Lode House, between ST_ABLK07 SK 1411 5542 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Alstonefield and Lode Mill on grass in front of drystone wall ST_ABLK08 SK 1277 5600 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Keek road, 100m NW of The Hollows on grass in front of drystone wall ST_ABLK10 SK 1073 5832 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Leek Road, Archford Moor on the verge
    [Show full text]
  • 18 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    18 bus time schedule & line map 18 Hanley View In Website Mode The 18 bus line (Hanley) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Hanley: 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM (2) Leek Town Centre: 6:30 AM - 6:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 18 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 18 bus arriving. Direction: Hanley 18 bus Time Schedule 43 stops Hanley Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 10:14 AM - 6:14 PM Monday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Bus Station, Leek Town Centre Cornwell Terrace, Leek Tuesday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM King Street, Leek Town Centre Wednesday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Sneyd Street, Leek Town Centre Thursday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Broad Street, Leek Friday 6:14 AM - 7:14 PM Daintry Street, Barnƒelds Saturday 7:32 AM - 7:14 PM Campbell Avenue, Barnƒelds Wallbridge Drive, Barnƒelds 18 bus Info Council Depot, Ladderedge Direction: Hanley Ladderedge, Leek Civil Parish Stops: 43 Trip Duration: 41 min Beech Close, Ladderedge Line Summary: Bus Station, Leek Town Centre, King Street, Leek Town Centre, Sneyd Street, Leek Town Ladderedge Centre, Daintry Street, Barnƒelds, Campbell Avenue, Barnƒelds, Wallbridge Drive, Barnƒelds, Council The Heights, Ladderedge Depot, Ladderedge, Beech Close, Ladderedge, Ladderedge, The Heights, Ladderedge, School Lane, Longsdon, The New Inn, Longsdon, Leek Old Road, School Lane, Longsdon Dunwood, Dunwood Lane, Dunwood, The Village, Endon, Park Lane, Endon, Toby Carvery, Endon, The New Inn, Longsdon Methodist Church, Endon, Endon High School, Endon, Bassnets Wood Road, Stocton Brook, Trintity
    [Show full text]