DOCSLIB.ORG

Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission Version)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission Version) Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission Version) Consultation Analysis Report Prepared by LUC May 2018 Project Title: Consultation Analysis Report on the Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission Version) Client: Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1.0 16/05/2018 1st Draft Report Sarah Temple Philip Smith 2.0 23/05/2018 Final Report Sarah Temple Philip Smith Philip Smith Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission Version) Consultation Analysis Report Prepared by LUC May 2018 Planning & EIA LUC LONDON Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 43 Chalton Street Bristol Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning London Edinburgh Registered Office: Landscape Management NW1 1JD Glasgow 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)20 7383 5784 Lancaster London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Overview of the Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version consultation 3 Statement of Community Involvement 3 Publication of the Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version consultation 4 Level of response 5 3 Summary of the representations 6 Appendix 1 Summary of individual comments and responses Appendix 2 List of statutory consultees and other stakeholder organisations Tables Table 2.1: SCI requirements and how they have been met 3 Table 2.2: Questions asked on the SA Submission Version Report 5 Table 3.1: Summary of key issues raised by respondents 7 1 Introduction 1.1 The Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Report, published alongside the Staffordshire Moorlands Local Plan, is used to assess how the policies in the Local Plan perform against a set of 18 sustainability objectives. 1.2 The Sustainability Appraisal has been subject to four rounds of public consultation: • SA Scoping Report: 13th August– 26th September 2014 • Interim Sustainability Appraisal Report: 28th April – 13th June 2016 • Draft Sustainability Appraisal Report: 24th July – 15th September 2017 • Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version Report: 27th February – 11th April 2018 1.3 This Consultation Analysis Report focuses on the Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version consultation. The report provides: • An overview of the Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version consultation process (Chapter 2) • A summary of the representations received (Chapter 3) 1.4 Appendix 1 provides a summary of each comment received on the Report. Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal 2 May 2018 (Submission Version) 2 Overview of the Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version consultation 2.1 In accordance with the SEA Directive, the Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Report was consulted on alongside the Staffordshire Moorlands’ Local Plan Submission Version. 2.2 In line with Regulation 13 of the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (the SEA Regulations) the consultation includes the statutory bodies Natural England, Historic England and the Environment Agency, alongside a wide range of other stakeholders and community organisations. Statement of Community Involvement 2.3 The Council’s Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) was adopted in April 2016. It outlines who should be consulted at each stage of Local Plan production and the methods that will be used to ensure effective involvement. 2.4 The SCI notes that it is a statutory requirement that the Council undertakes a Sustainability Appraisal (SA) to assess the economic, environmental, and social effects of a plan from the outset of the preparation process to inform policy and allow decisions to be made that accord with sustainable development. The SA documents are also subject to consultation alongside the plan and inform changes at each stage in the plan production process. 2.5 For the Regulation 19 (Submission Version) stage of the Local Plan, Figure 4.1 on page 36 of the SCI lists the consultation requirements. The table below shows these requirements and explains how they have been met as part of the Submission Version consultation. Table 2.1: SCI requirements and how they have been met Type of SCI Requirements How they have been met Consultee Statutory Summary document, All of the statutory bodies are on the Council’s Local Bodies publication on online Plan Consultation Database so they were directly portal, direct notification, notified about publication of the Local Plan and response form, website. associated documents. The other requirements listed were all undertaken as part of the consultation. Parish / Summary document, All of the Parish and Town Councils are on the Town publication on online Council’s Local Plan Consultation Database so they Councils portal, media releases, were directly notified about publication of the paper based, direct Submission Version document. The other notification, response requirements listed were all undertaken as part of form. the consultation. Paper copies of the consultation material were available at all libraries and Council offices in the District. Progress on the Local Plan is a standing item at the Parish Assembly meeting (to which all Parish and Town Councils in the District are invited) and officers attend to give updates and answer queries. General Summary document, If they had previously commented or registered an Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission 3 May 2018 Version) Type of SCI Requirements How they have been met Consultee Public publication on online interest (and so they were on the Local Plan portal, media releases, database) they were sent an additional paper based, direct communication to notify them of the publication. A notification, response summary document was produced in order to help form, social media, people understand the proposals. The other website. requirements listed were all undertaken as part of the consultation. Press releases, the Council’s website and social media were also used to raise awareness of the consultation. Local Summary document, If they had previously commented or registered an Businesses publication on online interest (and so they were on the Local Plan portal, Moorlands database) they were sent an additional Together Partnership, communication to notify them of the media releases, paper publication. The Council attended a scheduled based, direct notification, meeting of the Moorlands Together Partnership to response form, social highlight the plan and invite representations. The media, website. other requirements listed were all undertaken as part of the consultation Hard to Same as general public Refer to ‘General Public’ section above. In addition Reach plus and availability of to this, large print versions of the full consultation Groups documents in alternative document and the summary consultation document formats. to be made available on request. Developer / Summary document, The Council’s Local Plan consultation database Landowner / publication on online includes a number of developers, landowners and Agent portal, media releases, agents who are active in the area so many were paper based, direct informed through this mechanism. All the other notification, response methods listed were also used to raise awareness of form, social media, the consultation. Meetings (where appropriate) have website been ongoing throughout the process. Publication of the Sustainability Appraisal Submission Version consultation Consultation period (six weeks from 27th February to 11th April 2018) 2.6 The Council ran the consultation process of the SA Report at the same time as the Submission Version Local Plan, for six weeks between 27th February and 11th April 2018. Consultation methods 2.7 Statutory consultees (Natural England, Historic England and the Environment Agency), stakeholders, community organisations and individuals were invited to answer 11 questions on the SA via the following methods: • Online comments via the consultation portal • Letter • Email Staffordshire Moorlands Sustainability Appraisal (Submission 4 May 2018 Version) Table 2.2: Questions asked on the SA Submission Version Report Question 1 Do you support the overall approach taken to the appraisal of options? Question 2 Have we correctly identified the main significant effects and potential mitigation measures? Question 3 Do you wish to make a comment on the appraisal of one or more Local Plan policy option(s)? Question 4 Do you wish to make a comment on the appraisal of one or more housing or employment requirement option(s)? Question 5 Do you wish to make a comment on the appraisal of one or more proposed development site option(s)? Question 6 Do you wish to make a comment on the appraisal of alternative development approaches for Cheadle? Question 7 Do you wish to make a comment on the appraisal of alternative development approaches for the Rural Areas? Question 8 Do you wish to make a comment on the monitoring proposals, in particular the sustainability effects to be monitored and the information to be collected, including by whom and when? Question 9 Do you wish to make any other comments about this SA Report? Question 10 Does this February 2018 SA Report, together with the SA Scoping Report, provide sufficient information to demonstrate that an appropriate SA has been carried out of the Staffordshire Moorlands Local Plan? Question 11 Do you wish to make a comment on either or both of the supporting documents: the Habitats Regulations Assessment report of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Staffordshire 30Undar Es W Th Cheshire Derbyshire Wa Rw Ckshiir and Refg Rid an D Worcester Local
    No. 5H2 Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties. COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE 30UNDAR ES W TH CHESHIRE DERBYSHIRE WA RW CKSHIIR AND REFG RID AN D WORCESTER LOCAL BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOH ENGLAND RETORT NO •5112 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany PATTEN.PPD THE RT. HON. CHRIS PATTEN HP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE: BOUNDARIES WITH CHESHIRE, DERBYSHIRE,. WARWICKSHIRE, AND HEREFORD AND WORCESTER COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Staffordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Staffordshire, and in the adjoining counties of Cheshire, Derbyshire, West Midlands, Shropshire, Warwickshire, Hereford and Worcester and Leicestershire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; regional health authorities; public utilities in the area; the English Tourist Board; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle; and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to co-operate as necessary with each other, and with the District Councils concerned, to assist us in publicising the start of the review, by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Studies on the Derbyshire Dome D
    SEISMIC STUDIES ON THE DERBYSHIRE DOME DAVID EDWARD ROGERS A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth Sciences The University Leeds LS2 9JT February 1983 PhD Thesis February1983 SEISMIC STUDIES ON THE DERBYSHIRE DOME D. E. ROGERS Dept Earth Sciences ABSTRACT The Derbyshire Dome is thought to have been a stable uplifted area since at least Lower Carboniferous times. This project is principally concerned with four 30km seismic refraction lines which crossed the limestone outcrop of Derbyshire and N. Staffordshire in order to investigate the Dome's upper crustal structure, using quarry blasts as seismic sources. A time-term analysis of refracted arrival data defined basement structure more complicated than implied by the surface geology. The interpretation of these data was complicated by high (5.6-5.8km/s) velocity refractions from dolomitic horizons within the limestone sequence; the mean overburden velocity was determined to be about 5.2 km/s. The Dome could be divided into two pre-Carboniferous geological units separated approx- imately by the line of the NNW trending Bonsall Fault. To the north a broadly domal refractor of velocity 5.5-5.55km/s was mapped, and thought to correlate with both the shallow pre- Carboniferous volcanics encountered by the Woo Dale borehole and"the Ordovician shales encountered by the Eyam borehole below 1.8km of limestone. This refractor accordingly deepens beneath the Carboniferous sedimentary basins flanking the Dome. To the south of the Bonsall Fault zone, the Carbonifer- ous was found to be underlain by a refractor of velocity 5.63-5.7km/s, thought to be of Precambrian material similar to the rocks of Charnwood Forest, Leicestershire, some 40km south.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire 1
    Entries in red - require a photograph STAFFORDSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position ST_ABCD06 SK 1077 4172 B5032 EAST STAFFORDSHIRE DENSTONE Quixhill Bank, between Quixhill & B5030 jct on the verge ST_ABCD07 SK 0966 4101 B5032 EAST STAFFORDSHIRE DENSTONE Denstone in hedge ST_ABCD09 SK 0667 4180 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALTON W of Gallows Green on the verge ST_ABCD10 SK 0541 4264 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALTON near Peakstones Inn, Alton Common by hedge ST_ABCD11 SK 0380 4266 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Threapwood in hedge ST_ABCD11a SK 0380 4266 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Threapwood in hedge behind current maker ST_ABCD12 SK 0223 4280 B5032 STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHEADLE Lightwood, E of Cheadle in hedge ST_ABCK10 SK 0776 3883 UC road EAST STAFFORDSHIRE CROXDEN Woottons, between Hollington & Rocester on the verge ST_ABCK11 SK 0617 3896 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHECKLEY E of Hollington in front of wood & wire fence ST_ABCK12 SK 0513 3817 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS CHECKLEY between Fole and Hollington in hedge Lode Lane, 100m SE of Lode House, between ST_ABLK07 SK 1411 5542 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Alstonefield and Lode Mill on grass in front of drystone wall ST_ABLK08 SK 1277 5600 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Keek road, 100m NW of The Hollows on grass in front of drystone wall ST_ABLK10 SK 1073 5832 UC road STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS ALSTONEFIELD Leek Road, Archford Moor on the verge
    [Show full text]
  • White's 1857 Directory of Derbyshire
    391 WIRKSWORTH HUNDRED. ____________ This Hundred is bounded on the north and north-east by the High Peak Hundred, on the east by the Scarsdale Hundred, on the south and south-east, by the Appletree Hundred, and on the west by the river Dove, which separates it from Staffordshire, where at the north-west extremity, the Middle and Upper quarters of the parish of Hartington bound the south-west portion of the High Peak Hundred for ten miles, to the source of the rivers Dove and Goyt. This portion was, by order of Quarter Sessions of 28th June, 1831, annexed to the Bakewell division of Petty Sessions, and is now comprised in the north division of the county, the remainder of the Hundred being in the south division, with the Appletree, Morleston and Litchurch, and Repton and Gresley Hundreds, for which the polling places are Derby, Heanor, Ashbourn, Wirksworth, Melbourn, Belper, and Swadlincote; and those for the north division, Buxton, Alfreton, Bakewell, Castleton, Chapel-en-le-Frith, Chesterfield, Glossop, Tideswell, and Eckington. This Hundred contains 77,659 statute acres of land. The northern side of this Hundred partakes of the same features as the High Peak, though not quite so mountainous, and is often designated the Low Peak. It is noted as being almost the first seat of the cotton manufacture, (See Cromford,) for its warm baths at Matlock, its numerous caverns and picturesque dales—particularly Dovedale,—and the rich mineral field at its northern extremity. The southern side is more an agricultural district of fertile land with a variety of soils, principally a red loam on various substrata, and chiefly occupied in dairy farms, many of which are large.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Moorlands in the County of Staffordshire
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 114 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY C OMl'vlI SSI UN FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund Compton, GCB,KB£. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin,QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholm* Sir Andrew WheaUey,CBE. Mr P B Young, CBE. To the Rt H0n Roy Jenkins, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF STAFFORDSHIRE MOORLANDS IN THE COUNTY OF STAFFORDSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial.review of the electoral arrangements for the District of Staffordshire Moorlands in accordance with the requirements .of section 6? of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 6o(l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 3 June 197^ that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, copies of which were circulated to the Staffordshire County Council, Parish Councils and Parish Meetings in the district, the Member of Parliament for the constituency concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • “Counting Our Heritage” – an Example of How Local Authorities Can Use Volunteers
    “Counting our heritage” – an example of how local authorities can use volunteers Richard Tuffrey How do we assess the condition of our heritage assets? • In the order of 500,000 listed buildings in England (Historic England) • Of these, approximately 92% (460,000) are listed as Grade II (Historic England) • From 2006-2017, number of specialist heritage staff employed in local government declined from approx. 800 FTE to 500 FTE – a fall of approx. 38% (IHBC) Counting our heritage • One of 19 pilot schemes arranged by English Heritage in 2013 • Objective to test the practicality of working with non- professional volunteers to carry out a survey of all Grade II listed buildings • Project ran across the whole of High Peak and Staffordshire Moorlands (outside the National Park) Counting our heritage The process Remember: • Volunteers are acting as agents of the Council and so the same duty of care applies to both them and the public: o Act in professional manner o Health and safety • Owners of properties can be understandably suspicious: o Why is the Council undertaking the survey? o Why are volunteers being used? How: • Advertised the survey in the local press and contacted known sources of potential volunteers • Alert owners that the survey is taking place • Appoint suitably experienced consultant to act as Project Managers • Issue volunteers with: • Identifying lanyard • Letter of introduction from the Council and a point of contact back in the office • Hi vis jacket • Series of training events held: o Introduction to the project and why it is being undertaken o Introduction to ‘heritage assets’ and ‘assets at risk’ o Covered all relevant aspects of health and safety o Limitations of access for reasons of insurance cover o What to do if challenged o Volunteers allowed to choose an area to focus on o Practical example • Fieldwork o Issued with lots of 10 properties at a time o Encouraged to record everything digitally and email responses o Project team moderated results to ensure consistency between Volunteers 2 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 1 COUNTING OUR HERITAGE 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Framlington Longhorsley Lowick Matfen Middleton Milfield Netherton Netherwitton N° L 82 / 70 Journal Officiel Des Communautés Européennes 26
    26 . 3 . 84 Journal officiel des Communautés européennes N° L 82 / 67 DIRECTIVE DU CONSEIL du 28 février 1984 relative à la liste communautaire des zones agricoles défavorisées au sens de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE ( Royaume-Uni ) ( 84 / 169 / CEE ) LE CONSEIL DES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES , considérant que les indices suivants , relatifs à la pré­ sence de terres peu productives visée à l'article 3 para­ graphe 4 point a ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été retenus pour la détermination de chacune des zones en vu le traité instituant la Communauté économique question : part de la superficie herbagère par rapport à européenne, la superficie agricole utile supérieure à 70 % , densité animale inférieure à l'unité de gros bétail ( UGB ) à l'hectare fourrager et montants des fermages ne dépas­ sant pas 65 % de la moyenne nationale ; vu la directive 75 / 268 / CEE du Conseil , du 28 avril 1975 , sur l'agriculture de montagne et de certaines zones défavorisées ( 2 ), modifiée en dernier lieu par la directive 82 / 786 / CEE ( 2 ), et notamment son article 2 considérant que les résultats économiques des exploi­ tations sensiblement inférieurs à la moyenne , visés paragraphe 2 , à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point b ) de la directive 75 / 268 / CEE , ont été démontrés par le fait que le revenu du travail ne dépasse pas 80 % de la moyenne vu la proposition de la Commission , nationale ; considérant que , pour établir la faible densité de la vu l'avis de l'Assemblée ( 3 ), population visée à l'article 3 paragraphe 4 point c ) de la directive 75
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly List of Applications Validated by the Authority
    Peak District National Park Authority Aldern House, Baslow Road, Bakewell, Derbyshire, DE45 1AE Telephone number : 01629 816200 WEEKLY LIST OF APPLICATIONS VALIDATED BY THE AUTHORITY Applications validated between 01/03/2017 - 07/03/2017 Application Number: Name & Address: Agent Name P Number: Location: & Address: Proposal: Parish: Appl. type: Grid Ref.: Case Worker: NP/DDD/0317/0233 Mr Corbridge and Miss Alderson Oldfield Design FULL 421299 ALN P 11737 367498 Shutts Farm Holme Bank Studio Constraints Shutts Lane Holme Lane, Bakewell BAKEWELL Ranger Area - Derbyshire Neighbourhood Planning Area - DE451GF Landscape Character Type - FCE Landholding - DESCRIPTION Proposed erection of local need affordable dwelling. PARISH Bakewell View Documents NP/SM/0317/0209 Mr Geoffry Barber Anthony Short & Partners LBA 413826 ALN P 10871 LLP 349379 Blore Hall 34 Church Street Constraints Yerley Hill Ashbourne Blore Derbyshire Ranger Area - DE6 11AE Landscape Character Type - Heritage Asset - DESCRIPTION Listed Building consent - Addition of 2 No small single storey stone porches to holiday units 6 and 7 within the curtilage of the Grade II Listed Blore Hall PARISH Blore With Swinscoe View Documents NP/DDD/0317/0220 Mr J and Mrs J Meakin John Church Planning S73 421606 AAJK P 9922 Consultancy Ltd 376608 The White House and Victoria Buildings Constraints Butchers Cottage 117 High Street Main Road Clay Cross Ranger Area - Eyam CHESTERFIELD Landscape Character Type - Derbyshire FCE Landholding - S45 9DZ Conservation Area - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - Ranger Area - Landscape Character Type - FCE Landholding - Conservation Area - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - Airfield Safeguarding - DESCRIPTION Section 73 application for the removal of condition 2 from planning consent NP/DDD/0416/0367 PARISH Eyam View Documents WEEKLY LIST OF APPLICATIONS VALIDATED BY THE AUTHORITY Applications validated between 01/03/2017 - 07/03/2017 Application Number: Name & Address: Agent Name P Number: Location: & Address: Proposal: Parish: Appl.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Consultation
    PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY: LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CORE STRATEGY PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION STATEMENT September 2010 1 Peak District National Park Authority Member of the English National Park Authorities Association (ENPAA) Aldern House Baslow Road Bakewell Derbyshire DE45 1AE Tel: (01629) 816 200 Text: (01629) 816 319 Fax: (01629) 816 310 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.peakdistrict.gov.uk This and other Local Development Framework documents can be made available in large copy print, audio cassette, Braille or languages other than English. If you require the document in one of these formats please contact: Brian Taylor, Policy Planning Manager, Peak District National Park at the address above, Tel: 01629 816303, or email [email protected]. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Preliminary consultation on Issues, 2004 6 3 ‘Help Shape the Future’ consultation, 2005 8 4 Issues and Options consultation, 2007 10 5 Further consultation on Issues and Options, 2008 12 6 Refined Options consultation, 2009 14 7 Preferred Approaches consultation, 2009 15 8 Consultation under Regulation 27 16 Appendices: 1 Who we consulted on ‘Help Shape the Future’ 17 2 Key points arising from ‘Help Shape the Future’ consultation 22 3 Who we consulted on Issues and Options 25 4 Deposit locations and public libraries 29 5 Key points from Issues and Options consultation and how these were 30 addressed in Refined Options 6 Who we consulted in later stages 33 7 Key issues from Refined Options consultation and how these were 36 addressed in selecting Preferred Approaches 8 Key points from Preferred Approaches consultation and how these were 42 addressed in the Submission Core Strategy 9 Policy development through Refined Options - Preferred Options - 48 Submission version 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage and Impact Statement Blore Hall
    Anthony Short and Partners LLP 34 Church Street Ashbourne Derbyshire DE6 1AE ___________________________________________________________________________ HERITAGE AND IMPACT STATEMEN T BLORE HALL DEVELOPMENT - PROPOSED 2 NEW SINGLE STOREY FAMILY UNITS [With reference to Drawings: B20-09, B20-10, B20-11, B20-12, B20-13] 1.0 Background This document is a Heritage and Impact Statement prepared by Anthony Short and Partners LLP on behalf of our client Holiday Property Bond (HPB), with guidance from Historic England: The Setting of Heritage Assets (2015). The purpose of this statement is to assess the significance and impact on the heritage assets of Blore Hall, the church and the landscape and setting of the surrounding area by the creation of two additional family units within the HPB Bloor Hall development. 2.0 Site Location Blore is a remote village within the parish of Blore and Swinscoe, situated about four miles to the north west of Ashbourne, just south of Ilam near to Dovedale and the Derbyshire border (P1). P1 Blore Hall is situated within the village. The hall and associated buildings were converted to holiday accommodation in 1990. HPB bought the converted property in 1996 and have been used extensively by holidaymakers since 1998 when the first bookings were taken. 3.0 Historic and Arc hitectural Significance 3.1 ‘In the Domesday Survey of 1086 Blore is recorded as ‘Blora’ and belonged to Robert de Stafford. The manor was tenanted at that time by Edric. Within the manor there was enough land for five ploughs to till. The population consisted of four freemen and two villeins, or tenants who held land in return for labour services.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire. Leek
    DIRECfORY .] STAFFORDSHIRE. LEEK. 231 Petty Sessions are held at the Town ball, Market street, School of Art, Science & Technology, O}len September every alternate wednesday, at II a. m. &i at the Clerk's to July as per detailed programme, to be obtained free office, IO Derby street, Leek, daily (except on satur­ at the Institute, containing time-table, subjects, fees day), at II a.m. &i at the Public hall, Bradley &c. &c. Subscription Library (Book Cluh) ss. per Green, the second monday in every month at II a.m. year; open at all times when the library is open The places in the petty sessional division !!re : Alstone­ Leek Urban District Council Officials, Kineton Parkes, field, Biddulph, Blore-with-Swinscoe, Bradnop, Butter­ principal of Nicholson Institute; William Craigmile, ton, Calton, Cheddleton-with-Basford, Endon &i Stanley, head maste:r of school of art Fawfieldhead, Foxt, Grindon, Heathylee, Heaton, Hol­ Public Baths, 65 Derby street, James Olulow, supt linsclough, Horton, llam & Throwley, Ipstones, Leek, Stamp Office, Derby street, Aa.ron Ostler, distributor Leek Frith, Longsdon, Longnor, Lowe, Onecote, Quam­ Temperance Hall, Union street, Geo. Hy. Bowers, sec ford, Rudyard, Rushton James, Rushton Spencer, Town Hall, George Green, keeper Sheen, Tittesworth, Warslow &i E:kstones, Waterfall, Weighing Machine Offices, Derby street, J Ghn Ed ward W etton & W oodhouses Counsell, clerk PUBLIC ESTABLISHMENTS. VOLUN~E:ERS. Catholic Institute of the Blessed Virgin, King street, Mrs. rst Volunteer Battalion (The Prince of Wales's) North Elizabeth Haslam, lady superior Staffordshire Regiment (I Co. ), head quarters, Ca~-.. Cemetery, Compton, Charles Henshaw, registrar; Eli market, Capt.
    [Show full text]