DOCSLIB.ORG

Air Force Combat Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Air Force Combat Engineering Headquarters U.S. Air Force Fly – Fight – Win Combat Engineer Panel Brigadier General Tim Byers Director of Installations and Mission Support Air Combat Command 1 Fly – Fight – Win 2 RH Demo Op Fly – Fight – Win 3 Headquarters U.S. Air Force Fly – Fight – Win Combat Engineer Panel Brigadier General Tim Byers Director of Installations and Mission Support Air Combat Command 4 Way Ahead Air Force Civil Engineers – Who We Are Air Force Engineers Supporting Air Bases Air Force Engineers Supporting Joint Community Contract Support to the Fight – AFCEE / AFCESA Heavy Construction – The RED HORSE Growing to Meet the Demand Air Force Engineers are fully engaged in the GWOT fight, from sustaining ourFly bases – Fight to –reconstructingWin nations. 5 Air Force Civil Engineer Mission Provide, operate, and maintain installations, infrastructure, and facilities necessary to create and sustain responsive, persistent and effective combat operations on a global basis. Civil engineer forces support contingency operations by providing engineer support capabilities to employ, protect, sustain, and recover forces to meet Air Force and Joint taskings. Fly – Fight – Win 6 How do we do this mission? Prime BEEF In-garrison/Base Operational Support 10-12 short tons 29,000 Airmen in Total Force RED HORSE Heavy construction/Outside the Wire 3,000+ short tons Self-Sustaining Capability 3,000 Airmen in the Total Force Contract Support AFCEE / AFCESA Prime BEEF and RED HORSE provide a full spectrum of engineerFly support – Fight to – Winthe warfighter 7 Expeditionary Combat Support 37 contingency bases in CENTCOM … 11 still in use Largest effort since Vietnam! 23.5K deployed to CENTCOM AOR Fly – Fight – Win 8 Deployed Requirements May 03 Iraq/Afghanistan Joint Requirements 5000 Feb 02 4000 Nov 02 3000 2000 1000 0 OEF OIF Sep-01 Aug-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Apr-07Jun-07Aug-07 Dec-07 Steady State CENTCOM EUCOM SOUTHCOM NORTHCOM PACOM Joint AEF Supporting AF: 1483 AEF Supporting Army/Joint: 1009 AEF Other COCOM: 184 AEF Total Requirements: 2676 Standard Tour: 6 Months deployed, 12 months at home Airmen Open, EstablishFly – Fight and – Win Operate Airfields 9 365-Day TDY Requirements Individual Augmentees and Joint Manning Document requirements driving 365- day requirements - Filling Joint Staffs - Provincial Reconstruction AFSC Title Aug 07 Dec 07 - EOD Staffs/WIT 032E Officer 35 37 3E0X1 Electrical 0 3 - Training Teams 3E0X2 Power Pro 15 15 3E1X1 HVAC/R 0 3 - Civil Affairs missions 3E3X1 Structures 6 6 3E4X1 Utilities 2 2 Large demand for EOD, 3E6X1 Ops Mgt 6 6 Power Production and 3E7X1 Fire 0 1 Officers 3E8X1 EOD 17 17 Totals 81 90 Continued “growth”Fly – Fight expected – Win in FY08 10 CE Support to Air Bases 60% of total requirements (1500 of 2500) Al Udeid – 280 Airmen, increasing to 320 Balad AB, Iraq – 210 Airmen Ali, BIAP, Al Dhafra, Ali Al Salem, Kirkuk & Manas: 100-130 Airmen Fly – Fight – Win 11 CENTAF Airbase Laydown 506 ECES, Kirkuk IZ TOTAL: 1952 PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT 376 ECES, Manas KG 74 39 7 6 0 126 844 359 76 54 619 PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 64 33 6 4 53 160 332 ECES, Balad IZ PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 451 ECES, Kandahar AG 129 51 10 8 123 321 PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 14 0 0 0 9 23 447 ECES, BIAP IZ PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 80 47 25 6 56 214 455 ECES, Bagram AG PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 27 0 0 0 0 27 438 EMSG, Al Asad IZ PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 1 0 0 0 0 1 407 ECES, Ali IZ PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 82 47 6 5 39 179 387 ESPT, KCIA KU PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 11 0 0 2 28 41 386 ECES, Ali Al Salem KU PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 83 39 6 6 132 266 379 ECES, Al Udeid Qatar 380 ECES, Al Dhafra UAE 64 ESS, Eskan KSA PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 205 56 6 9 141 417 76 47 6 8 61 198 PB FF EOD CBRN ESCORT Total 9 0 4 2 5 20 as of 10 Jul 07 CENTAF: BOS-I SAA Fly – Fight – Win 12 Combat Airmen SrA Jordan Davenport, Barksdale AFB, LA Deployed Firefighter, 332 CES, Balad Airbase, Iraq Turkish civilian plane crash outside base Zero-visibility fog 40 passengers on board Still on fire Dispatched AF P-19 and Army security 4-man P-19 Crew extinguished aircraft and several spot fires Cooled the wreckage to extract bodies Recovered 39 remains/1 survivor Plane had been refused landing, but pilot tried to land anyway Ordinary Airmen providing extraordinary engineer support to Flythe – warfighterFight – Win 13 Combat Airmen SSgt Barton I. Rembert, Mountain Home AFB, Idaho Deployed EOD Flight/Team Leader, 332 CES, FOB Paliwoda, Iraq EOD convoy forced down a narrow driveway into a kill zone IED placed behind cab of dump truck Directed team to deploy robot, investigate, and disarm IED Insurgents set off simultaneous detonation at Iraqi checkpoint Several burning ordnance items & suicide vests First responders would not extinguish due UXOs SSgt Barton neutralized burning ordnance Saw two soldiers standing on a command wire IED Barton left his vehicle to bring soldiers to safety Returned to disarm IED & detonate explosive Awarded Bronze star medal for this deployment Fly – Fight – Win 14 CE Support to the Joint Community 40% of total requirements (1000 of 2500) 70% of Officer requirements (142 of 211) Facility Engineer Teams/Dets – 9-18 Airmen @ 6 locations Utility Detachments – 55 personnel @ 3 locations Training Teams – 70 Airmen in multiple locations EOD Companies – 6 @ 20-50 Airmen each PRTs – 20 Airmen Engineers, mult locs Fly – Fight – Win 15 ILO Training Locations Leonard Wood, MO Ft. Lewis WA Security Forces SF/CST Ft. McCoy WI CE/CST Ft. Dix NJ SF/CST Landover, MD Ft. Riley KS DOCEX TT/CST Aberdeen MD Weapons Ft. Sill OK Intelligence CST Ft. Lee VA Supply Ft. Eustis VA Transportation Ft. Bragg NC PRT, CA & SIS Ft. Huachuca AZ Ft. Jackson, SC Interrogator & EWO Ft. Bliss TX Postal / NIACT SF/CST Ft. Hood TX Camp Shelby MS JSTO ILO Training Sites CST SF/CST Ft. Gordon GA Specialty Training Communications Camp Bullis Redstone, AL Blue on Blue Training BC3 GATOR (EOD) Fly – Fight – Win 16 ILO Training Curriculum UXO/IED Training Army Commo Skills & Map Reading/Land Navigation Procedures Combat Lifesavers (CLS) HMMWV Drivers Training Cultural Awareness/Language Tactical Driving Training Convoy Ldr Training & Convoy CFLCC Rules for Use of Force Operations Media Awareness Convoy Live-Fire Exercise Troop Leading Procedures Crew Served Weapons (TLPs) Small Arms Qualification Foreign Weapons Identification Personnel Recovery CASEVAC Procedures Amplifies the combat skills learned at home station just in time,Fly in – Fighta joint – WinenvironmentAETC ILO Spin-Up, Nov 0617 ILO/IA in OIF 732 ECES, Balad 732 ECES Det 10, Speicher 6 55 ILO C2 Staff Utilities Team 732 ECES Det 6, Balad TF Troy EOD, Various 55 97 (+32) Utilities Team TF Troy EOD 732 ECES Det 15, Balad 732 ECES Det 5, Various 10 19 Facility Engineer Team C-IED Weapons Intel Teams (WIT) 732 ECES Det 24, Speicher 732 ECES Det 3, VBC 9 55 Facility Engineer Team (28 Oct 07) Utilities Team 732 ELRS, (various) 732 ECES Det 2, VBC 19 9 MTT Regional & Garrison Support Unit Facility Engineer Team 732 ECES Det 14, Al Asad 732 EMSG, Various 9 9 Facility Engineer Team CAFTT-I 9 AFELM, (various) 386 EMSG, Ali Al Salem 586 EMSG Det 1, KNB 586 AEG, Arifjan 66 11 11 8 MNSTC-I, MNF-I, MNC-I, SOCCENT, etc AAS TLE KNB TLE S&D Team Fly – Fight – Win 18 ILO/IA in OEF 755 AEG, Kabul 10 Bridage Support Teams 755 AEG, Bagram 9 AFELM, (various) 9 FET 26 CFC-A, CJTF-76, OSC-A, etc TF Paladin EOD, Bagram 67 EOD Company and Clearance Det ILO Fire Team, JAF 6 Rapid Air Mobil Squad (FF/Rescue) 755 AEG, (various) 11 Embedded Training Teams 755 AEG Det *, (various) 20 Provincial Reconstruction Team 755 AEG, (various) 5 Area Support Groups RDD 29-July-07 Fly – Fight – Win 19 Combat Airmen Projects: Panjshir Provincial Reconstruction Team, Afghanistan Scope: A combined team of Airmen, Soldiers, U.S. civilians and Afghans make up this PRT. They support the construction of micro hydro plants for electricity generation, roads, bridges, wells, schools, and even a radio station through Task Force Cincinnatus. Effect: Providing Technical Advice and support to help the Afghans rebuild their country. “That is a win-win situation, the Afghans have control over the project and they buildFly –it Fightthemselves, – Win which instills pride”20 Combat Airmen Project: Beddown of U.S. Army Brigade Combat Team “Surging” into Baghdad AOR (Camp Taji, Iraq) Scope: Bed-down troops, Erect Force Provider DFACs, Construct 8 C2 Facilities, Renovate Detainee Holding Area Effect: Provided additional work, living and maintenance areas at Camp Taji to support additional personnel surging into the MND-B AOR. Fly – Fight – Win 21 USACE (GRD) Integration Major Mike Zuhlsdorf, HQ ACC/A7Z Deployed Location: Balad Air Base, Iraq USACE Gulf Region North, Dep Area Engr 35 mil/civ; 70 projects; $400M dsn/const A/F pavements, C2 Center, Hospital, incinerators, vehicle mx, dorms, overhead cover protection Challenges: Deconflicting Army & AF reqts and execution methods Lack of security drove CoE to cut QA Foreign Nationals live/work on-base One living compound hit w/ IDF; contract suspended due to exodus Contractor plane crash killed 40 Turkish workers; delayed finish of 3 projects Fly – Fight – Win 22 AFCEE Iraq Program As of 1 Oct 07: 245 task orders valued at $4.24B have been awarded 17 additional task orders/mods valued at $361M are pending 72% construction complete AFCEE approach / reasons
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marine Corps Engineer Association History
    Photo from National Archives MARINEMARINE CORPSCORPS ENGINEER ENGINEER ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION HISTORYHISTORY --201 20177 Engineers Up! - 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS WORLD WAR ONE BY PHIL MARTIN, MSGT(RET) 33 GATE GUARDIAN FOR MARINE CORPS ENGINEER 1312 SCHOOL RETURN OF THE TD 18 BY ROBIN GENTRY, COL(RET) MARINE CORPS ENGINEERS IN VIETNAM BY PHIL 1414 MARTIN, MSGT(RET) AND ROBIN GENTRY, COL(RET) SSGT RECKLESS: KOREAN WAR HERO EXCERPT 22 FROM NANCY LEE WHITE HOFFMAN’S 1992 22 LEATHERNECK ARTICLE FIRST COMBAT ENGINEERS COMMAND 24 24 CHRONOLOGY SECOND COMBAT ENGINEERS COMMAND 31 CHRONOLOGY 31 THIRD COMBAT ENGINEERS COMMAND 37 CHRONOLOGY 37 2 - Engineers Up! 2 WORLD WAR ONE BY PHIL MARTIN, MSGT(RET) Photo from National Archives THE BEGINNINGS It is believed that early man discovered fire, when lightning hit a bog full of moss. This prehistoric man kept the fire going by piling up the moss for cooking and warmth. As man evolved, he invented hunting tools to kill animals, such as the Woolly Mammoth and other fur bearing animals for their skins to make clothes and their meat for food. Roving bands of people attempted to barter for the things they needed or sometimes took the materials they wanted by harming or killing the opposing party. Eventually, mankind learned to cultivate crops allowing him to settle in farms to provide food for his family. With these beginnings of civilization, leaders and councils were picked to organize communities and make decisions for the betterment of the citizenry. The leaders formed governments and declared certain regions for themselves; forming kingdoms, granting councils the ability to make laws, and enforce regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Mine Clearing Technology
    Introduction to Mine Clearing Technology ABSTRACT This paper presents the technologies and methods developed for mine clearing operations currently used by the military and humanitarian demining organisations. In any mine clearing operation, the operating environment and the type of threats are never the same. Thus, a single method or type of equipment rarely constitutes the most successful means of resolving the problem in terms of time, cost and effectiveness; a combination of tools is more commonly employed to ensure a successful mine clearing mission. This paper aims to give an introduction to and appreciation of the key mine clearing methods and equipment, and the key differences and considerations for military and humanitarian operations. The common methods of demining such as manual demining, explosive mine breaching and mechanical demining will be discussed. The design considerations for mine flails on mine clearing vehicles will also be presented. Tan Chun Gary Wong Hock Lye Bryan Soh Chee Weng Introduction to Mine Clearing 118 Technology Despite the initial development of mine INTRODUCTION clearing concepts as a form of countermeasure against mines during wartime, the real need History of Mines for mine clearing usually begins after the end of hostilities. This is attributed to the very Mines, derived from the Latin word ‘Mina’ nature of why mines were laid in the first place meaning ‘vein of ore’ was originally used to – to deter access to and use of land. Mines laid describe the digging of minerals from the during conflicts are rarely removed at the end earth. Over time, it has become a term used of the conflicts due to the lack of proper mine by military engineers to denote the explosives maps, markings, loss of such maps and markings they lay in the ground during battles.
    [Show full text]
  • Fm 3-34.170/Mcwp 3-17.4 (Fm 5-170)
    FM 3-34.170/MCWP 3-17.4 (FM 5-170) ENGINEER RECONNAISSANCE March 2008 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online <www.us.army.mil> and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at <http://www.train.army.mil>. *FM 3-34.170/MCWP 3-17.4 (FM 5-170) Field Manual Headquarters No. 3-34.170/MCWP 3-17.4 (5-170) Department of the Army Washington, DC, 25 March 2008 Engineer Reconnaissance Contents Page PREFACE ............................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................ix Chapter 1 ENGINEER RECONNAISSANCE ..................................................................... 1-1 Engineer Functions............................................................................................. 1-1 Army Warfighting Functions ............................................................................... 1-3 Engineer Reconnaissance ................................................................................. 1-4 Engineer Reconnaissance Team Capabilities and Limitations.......................... 1-9 Chapter 2 INTEGRATING ENGINEER RECONNAISSANCE CAPABILITIES ................. 2-1 Enabling Information Superiority ........................................................................ 2-1 Integrating Assured Mobility
    [Show full text]
  • 9 » Combined Arms Breaching^Qperations
    ^°: 13 -1 ¿¡s 9 ^í? ô » J_. klS-1 Combined Arms Breaching^Qperations HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ¿?2&°n"ÍS S*** 00 ' X>3l0-t'£050 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. m FM 90-13-1 Cl CHANGE HEADQUARTERS NO. 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 7 May 1993 COMBINED ARMS BREACHING OPERATIONS 1. Change FM 90-13-1, 28 February 1991, as follows: Remove old pages Insert new pages iii and iv iii and iv Appendices pages D-l through D-15 and E-l through E-16 Glossary-1 through Glossary-10 Glossary-1 through Glossary-12 Reference-1 Reference-1 and Reference-2 Index-1 through Index-4 Index-1 through Index-4 2. A star (★) marks new or changed material. 3. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication. DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. By Order of the Secretary of the Army: GORDON R. SULLIVAN General, United States Army Chief of Staff Official: vLJfcr MILTON H. HAMILTON Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army 03652 Pentagon i.ihrer y (ANR-FL) ATTN: i/'üi'T imerits SsctiO® Room l/\hlo, rOntagon Washington. DC 20310-6050 DISTRIBUTION: Active Army, USAR, and ARNG: To be distributed in accordance with DA Form 12-11-E, requirements for FM 90-13-1, Combined Arms Breaching Operations (Qty rqr block no. 5012). I % Field Manual 90-13-1 HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 28 February 1991 Combined Arms Breaching Operations Contents PREFACE iv CHAPTER 1. CHALLENGE TO MANEUVER 1-1 CHAPTER 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Roles and Capabilities of Engineer Robots in Modern Armies
    CURRENT AND FUTURE ROLES AND CAPABILITIES OF ENGINEER ROBOTS IN MODERN ARMIES Michal Kopuletý Abstract: The paper deals with current and future roles of engineer robots in the world armies and especially within Czech Army Corps of Engineers. First chapter gives reader insight into problematics. Second chapter is dedicated to military robots, their definition, features, basic requirements and their taxonomy. Third chapter is focused on current and future roles and capabilities of engineer robots within world armies and also Czech army and gives some general recommendations regarding to future application of engineer robots into military practise. The last chapter summarizes the scientific outputs and briefly inform about possible future use of engineer robots and their importance. Knowledge obtained by studying of scientific and professional literature was assessed by methods of analysis and deduction. Additional information was gathered by interviews with experts. The paper can be used as brief introduction into current and future roles of unmanned/robotic systems within military engineering and as study material for engineer officers, students and other interested persons. Keywords: engineer robot, unmanned system, military engineering 1. Introduction Military engineering (MILENG) covers broad spectrum of activities – from combat to construction. Character and phase of the operation affect type of provided engineer support. Engineer tasks are usually very challenging and specialized. These types of tasks demand large quantity of time, forces, and assets and require special equipment [1]. Traditionally, MILENG tasks have been man power intensive, time-consuming, logistically demanding and dangerous [2]. What is more, military engineering and especially combat engineer tasks are frequently conducted in hostile environment with explosive hazard.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream 1 Bridging & Gap Crossing
    Page 1 of 17 Defence Leaders© agenda subject to change depending on speaker availability 12th NOVEMBER 2019 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, DAY 1 MECHANISED ENGINEERING With the recent renewed peer threat to NATO and allied forces, a possibility of returning to urban terrain warfare has placed greater importance on movement and mobility. The emphasis on manoeuvrability for an active allied force ensures the war fighter can operate efficiently and with battlefield momentum. Maintaining the freedom of movement against a peer threat guarantees the forces fighting capability is not hindered by the terrain obstacles. This renewed threat has identified capability gaps which can be exploited by adversaries and needs to be addressed. While discussing the use of vehicles and autonomy, Combat Engineer 2019 will explore these capability gaps, giving the opportunity for nations to share their unique challenges with supporting the war fighter’s mobility. It will explore this theme with the view to understanding potential solutions that can aid in the future theatres of operation. 0800 - Registration and welcome coffee 0855 - Chairman’s opening remarks Major General (Retd) Mungo Melvin CB OBE, Former GOC UK Support Command and Former Colonel Commandant of the Royal Engineers, British Army SUPPORTING THE MANOEUVRABILITY OF THE WARFIGHTER Primary mission tasks need to be carried out efficiently and rapidly in order to gain a tactical advantage over adversaries. The engineers of any military must maintain the mobility of troops and support the tri-services in being able to move freely in areas of operations. This section will give context to the over-arching near pear threat that we face and how NATO and NATO friendly forces are reacting to protect our allies and to keep the war fighter moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming Combat Support Capabilities to Face the Complex 21St Century Operating Environment
    CONFERENCE DATES 23rd - 24th February 2016 LOCATION London, UK BRITISH ARMY REFORMING COMBAT SUPPORT CAPABILITIES TO FACE ENDORSED EVENT COVERING ALL KEY AREAS FOR FUTURE THE COMPLEX 21ST CENTURY OPERATING ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING BENEFITS INCLUDE: DEVELOPMENT Shape discussions and Collaborate with customers Be the first to hear the Receive end-user influence requirements as and other stakeholders to latest UK combat support feedback from successful global combat support staff explore long-term trends in priorities and be on point to missions and use these to work to develop capability to military engineering and how to place your solutions at the contextualise your product’s face future challenges shape your business and target heart of the discussion role in the next operational markets for future success success story SPEAKER HIGHLIGHTS INCLUDE: Brigadier General Major General Major General Mark W. Yenter, Brigadier Simon Humphrey Oshri Lugasi K. D. McQuillan Deputy Commanding General Director, Capability Commanding Officer, Corps Chief Military Engineer, Combat Engineering and Directorate of Engineers, Canadian Armed Forces International Operations, Combat Support, Israeli Defence Force United States Army Corps British Army of Engineers Lieutenant Colonel Colonel Jason Hones Colonel Jim Burke Lieutenant Colonel Jochen Gumprich Assistant Director Plans, Director of Engineers, Richard Burnet Head of Engineering Capability Directorate Irish Defence Forces Staff Officer- Engineer Branch- Army Development Combat Support, Operations
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility and Survivability
    FM 5-10 CHAPTER 3 Mobility and Survivability Mobility and survivability are the primary tasks of the engineer on the battle- field. The platoon leader requires a detailed understanding of this BOS to suc- ceed. This chapter provides the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) needed for the platoon to conduct mobility, countermobility, and survivability. MOBILITY Mobility enables the commander to maneuver tactical units into positions of advantage over the enemy. In the attack, engineers reduce enemy obstacles and fortifications that inhibit maneuver. Expanded engineer reconnaissance capability is needed to identify routes, existing obstacles, and minefields. Open areas that are level provide good sites for aircraft landing strips; however, in most cases, the soil must be stabilized. The application of the breaching fundamentals (suppress, obscure, secure, and reduce {SOSR}) and the organization of the force in terms of support, breach, and assault forces are standard. However, open areas may offer greater opportunity to bypass enemy obstacles because of the greater range of mobility afforded by the terrain. Exercise caution when choosing to bypass enemy obstacles, since the bypass may lead the force to the enemy's engagement area (EA). Additionally, expect the enemy to make extensive use of rapid mine-laying techniques that include SCATMINE delivery systems, as well as more conventional methods of mine emplacement. OBSTACLE BREACHING The platoon leader must decide where the best breach location is. Never breach where the avenue of approach crosses the obstacle. The enemy is sure to have pre- planned artillery there. Pick a location away from obvious breaching sites to reduce the threat of artillery.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineers As Infantry United States Army Engineeer Center and Fort Belvoir, Va
    IE $,-<*..I'ri . .p rvvvl .- - ,,.?,.." -x : .\ , 1,,. .~ , - - ngineer Z. 1 THE MAGAZINE RIR FMY ENG~NEERS FALL ... 'L:~ ENGINEERS AS INFANTRY UNITED STATES ARMY ENGINEEER CENTER AND FORT BELVOIR, VA - COMMANDER/COIKMANDANT MG James N. Ellis DEPUTY COMMANDANT COL Alvin G. Rowe CHIEF OF STAFFfDEPUTY INSTALLATION COMMANDER COL Paul J. Higgins COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR CSM Marvin L. Knowles DIRECTORATES DIRECTORATE OF ENGINEER FORCE MANAGEMENT LTC Arthur S Brown DIRECTORATE OF COMBAT DEVELOPMENTS COL Phillip R Hoge DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING DEVELOPMENTS COL Stanley R Johnson DIRECTORATE OF TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COL Ralph T Rundle On the cover: - -- - Engine= - The rxper~e71cesof t<r>oengr- UNITS neer battalions trailling as in- ENGINEER CENTER BRIGADE fantry is our courr story. COL Don W Barber Though a secorrdar.y combat ' ' enpineer mission, seruing as ENGINEER TRAINING BRIGADE infantcr is, as the nuihoi k . :' "', . \ ; notes, . .. a wartime mission COL Peter J Groh often assumed at a critical i::, lime and at a critical lace." PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER 1Iy' .. (photo by John ~10rencei MAJ James E. Kiley Jr. EDITOR John Florence ASSISTANT EDITOR SSG Bernard W. Tate Special thanks to Jim Wilson and to the artists ART DIRECTOR and proofreaders in the Engineer School's Train- John Florence ing Literature Division. VOLUME 12 F~LL1982 NUMBER 3 FEATURES 8 A Materially Different Bridge by Richard W. Helmke 11 Predicting Concrete Quality by Debbie J. Lawrence 12 Washington's Legacies to the Modern Army by David Curtis Skaggs, Ph.D. L, ..-,,,.,. ,',.u,-,r,.li,,. 20 16 U.S. vs. Soviet Engineer Training hy CPT Geor-ge D.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Military Engineer Unit and CET Search and Detect Manual
    United Nations Military Engineer Unit & CET Search and Detect Manual Second Edition January 2020 DEPARTMENT OF PEACE OPERATIONS UN Military Engineer Unit and Counter Explosive Threat (CET) Search and Detect Manual Produced by: Office of Military Affairs, Department of Peace Operations UN Secretariat One UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017 Tel. 917-367-2487 Approved by: Jean-Pierre Lacroix, Under-Secretary-General for Peace Operations/Head of the Department of Peace Operations (DPO). January 2020. Contact: All enquires for this Manual and/or requests for amendments or comments should be submitted to the Policy and Doctrine Team, Office of Military Affairs, DPO. History: This Manual supersedes the UN Peacekeeping Mission Military Engineer Unit Manual dated 01 September 2015. Review date: January 2023 Reference number: 2020.03 Printed at the UN, New York 1 UN Military Engineer Unit and Counter Explosive Threat (CET) Search and Detect Manual Preface We are delighted to introduce the United Nations Military Engineer Unit and Counter Explosive Threat (CET) Search and Detect Manual, a guide for commanders and staff deployed in peace operations, and a reference for Member States and the staff at United Nations Headquarters. UN peace operations are rarely limited to one type of activity. As they work to implement their mandates provided by the United Nations Security Council in order to create conditions for a return to stability, peacekeeping missions may require military units to perform challenging tasks involving the judicious use of force, particularly in situations where the Host Nation is unable to provide security and maintain public order. To meet these complex peacekeeping challenges, military components often play a pivotal role in providing and maintaining a secure environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The MINEX Center
    Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction Volume 7 Issue 1 The Journal of Mine Action Article 17 April 2003 The MINEX Center Minex Minex MINEX Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Minex, Minex (2003) "The MINEX Center," Journal of Mine Action : Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 17. Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol7/iss1/17 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction by an authorized editor of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Minex: The MINEX Center ocher munitions represent. Mine risk population's awareness. about neutralization procedures. This education is completed by concrete The training will be under the information can on ly be given ro The MIN EX Center assistance ro the victims of mines among responsibili ty of a French company accredited staff having all the technical chose populations, namely medical, accredited by the French Ministry of abilities to use it. ro engineer NCOs who have already surgical and orthopedic ca.re. Defen se. The School, as a service provider, This article highlights the efforts ofthe French Army Engineer School's MIN EX obrained the first two levels-MIN EX 2 Humanitarian demining remains rhe gives assistance in the form of offering Mine Risk Education program.
    [Show full text]
  • MARINE CORPS ENGINEER SCHOOL Organizations & Units
    Organizations & Units Serving Proudly COL NIEL NELSON SGTMAJ RODRIQUEZ MARINE CORPS ENGINEER SCHOOL The Marine Corps Engineer School was activated in May 1941 at Quantico, VA, and relocated to its present location at Courthouse Bay, Camp Lejeune, in 1942. The school prepares officer and enlisted personnel for duty with the Fleet Marine Force by providing formal instruction and practical application in the engineer, and utilities fields at the entry level, noncommissioned officer, and supervisory levels. The school was disbanded in 1947 and reactivated in 1949. In 1955 the school name was changed from Engineer School Battal- ion to Marine Corps Engineer School. Although the school has undergone many changes since its conception, it remains the center for educating engineers for the Marine Corps. Administration Division: Responsible for personnel and legal administration, postal, morale, pay and administrative functions for permanent personnel and student personnel of Marine Corps Engineer School (MCES). Page 44 2007 MCEA Newsletter Academic Division Responsible for academic operations to include: development of academic programs and the execution of approved courses of instruction; administrative, reproduction and audiovisual support functions associated with academics; administration of the apprentice- ship program; and conduct of Marine Corps required training. Support Division Responsible for supply/fiscal management, equipment maintenance, billeting, food service, area facilities and area support tasks. HEADQUARTERS AND SERVICE COMPANY Provide service and support to MCES in the functional areas of administration/ personnel administration, supply/fiscal, MCCS and motor transport. Provide engineer equipment maintenance support and consolidated maintenance management for all assigned equip- ment. Perform other functions as necessary for the discipline, morale, and welfare of military personnel assigned to MCES.
    [Show full text]