DOCSLIB.ORG

Stream 1 Bridging & Gap Crossing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Page 1 of 17 Defence Leaders© agenda subject to change depending on speaker availability 12th NOVEMBER 2019 CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, DAY 1 MECHANISED ENGINEERING With the recent renewed peer threat to NATO and allied forces, a possibility of returning to urban terrain warfare has placed greater importance on movement and mobility. The emphasis on manoeuvrability for an active allied force ensures the war fighter can operate efficiently and with battlefield momentum. Maintaining the freedom of movement against a peer threat guarantees the forces fighting capability is not hindered by the terrain obstacles. This renewed threat has identified capability gaps which can be exploited by adversaries and needs to be addressed. While discussing the use of vehicles and autonomy, Combat Engineer 2019 will explore these capability gaps, giving the opportunity for nations to share their unique challenges with supporting the war fighter’s mobility. It will explore this theme with the view to understanding potential solutions that can aid in the future theatres of operation. 0800 - Registration and welcome coffee 0855 - Chairman’s opening remarks Major General (Retd) Mungo Melvin CB OBE, Former GOC UK Support Command and Former Colonel Commandant of the Royal Engineers, British Army SUPPORTING THE MANOEUVRABILITY OF THE WARFIGHTER Primary mission tasks need to be carried out efficiently and rapidly in order to gain a tactical advantage over adversaries. The engineers of any military must maintain the mobility of troops and support the tri-services in being able to move freely in areas of operations. This section will give context to the over-arching near pear threat that we face and how NATO and NATO friendly forces are reacting to protect our allies and to keep the war fighter moving. 0900 – Current peer threat analysis and the role of NATO initiatives in deterring adversaries • A look into the current NATO engineering operations and initiatives commanded by the MNCNE • The need to reassure NATO allies to deter the perceived threat • Importance of addressing engineering capabilities gaps to host allies amongst NATO’s EFP Battle groups Lieutenant General Sławomir Wojciechowski, Commander, NATO Multinational Corps NorthEast 0930 – ADS’s role in supporting the combat engineer • Shaping the engineering world with innovative capabilities • Supporting the troops on deployment • How ADS is leading the way Anthony Harrison, Regional Account Manager – Army, ADS 1000 – Understanding NATO’s required response to peer threats • Outlining the current threat picture in Europe • Expanding on current western planning and the role of the US • Evaluating the next 30 years of planning for peer threats Lieutenant General (Retd) Ben Hodges, Former Commanding General, US Army Europe; Pershing Chair in Strategic Studies, Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA) 1030 – Meeting future military gap crossing requirements to enhance the war fighter’s mobility • Enabling line of communication bridging • Live load and span requirements for dry and wet gap crossings • Future developments to accommodate heavier loads with a rapidly deployable capability Steve Danner, Military Sales and Marketing Manager, ACROW Bridge Page 2 of 17 Defence Leaders© agenda subject to change depending on speaker availability 1100 - Morning coffee and networking Hosted by ADS VEHICLE PROGRAMMES AND TRENDS IN THE ENGINEERING DOMAIN A fundamental role for all Combat Engineers involves the use of specific types of vehicles to be able to successfully manoeuvre forces over terrain. In recent years, vehicle procurement programmes have seen an unprecedented rise in the market. This has been due to impending mission demands created by differing operational environments and the rapid development of autonomous and unmanned technologies. 1145 – The French Engineers vision for the future through the perspective of the SCORPION program. • Consequences in organisation, training, equipment and doctrine in high intensity conflicts. • Adapting from Afghanistan to Mali – Importance of command and control capabilities • SCORPION Program: Engineering equipment modernisation and the new ‘info-valued and collaborative’ combat system. Colonel Grégoire Potiron de Boisfleury, Doctrine and Studies Department Head, French Engineer School, French Armed Forces 1215 – All-Terrain multi-purpose vehicles for efficient transportation and material handling • Commercial off the shelf solutions from a mass-tailoring professional • All-Terrain operation capability and ease of use on operations • Worldwide service network and support organisation Valtra 1245 – The impact of the Armed Forces initiatives on the Canadian military engineer • Identifying requirements to support the deployment of forces • Current overview of the Canadian engineering acquisitions projects • Prioritizing immediate requirements and the impact on capability development Major General Sylvain Sirois, Chief Military Engineer – Chief of Staff (Infrastructure & Environment), Canada Department of National Defence, Assistant Deputy Minister (Infrastructure & Environment) 1315 – Protected mobility across the spectrum of conflict • Challenges faced preparing forces for asymmetric scenarios • Equipping a single vehicle platform to perform multiple tasks in support of asymmetric operations • Mine clearance, counter-IED and EOD remotely operating platforms Pearson Engineering 1330 - Lunch and networking MOBILITY OPTIMISATION THROUGH VEHICLES AND INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Technology is rapidly advancing in all domains and emerging autonomous solutions are frequently being analysed within the engineering field. New advancements in unmanned systems such as EOD removal are prompting the war fighter and industry experts to converse over imminent future solutions that can assist in preparing troops for the future operation environments. This section sets out to look at these solutions and concepts and understand the role of autonomous and robotic systems in enhancing mobility. 1500 – US Army’s approach to improving bridging capabilities in line with vehicle SWaP specifications • Vehicle dimension challenges and the current mobility requirements • How land force vehicle procurement affects engineering capabilities • Analysing the engineering autonomous systems of the future Colonel Lynn W. Ray, Branch Chief Program Integration, US Army Page 3 of 17 Defence Leaders© agenda subject to change depending on speaker availability 1530 – Engineering vehicles variables for specific operational requirements • The importance of working with the consumer throughout the tender process • Adapting a vehicle rapidly to be able to assist in different operations • Mechanised engineering equipment – What needs to be considered 1600 – Utilisation of advanced mobility capabilities • Current mobility and counter-mobility operations of the German Armed Forces • Requirements for future mobility systems • Further considerations to incorporate area denial capabilities Colonel Frank Ennen, Branch Head – Engineer Branch, Bundeswehr – Army Concepts and Capabilities Development Centre 1630 – Afternoon coffee and networking STREAM 1: INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING STRUCTURES AND THEIR FUTURE REQUIRMENTS With engineering commands differing amongst nations, it is important to focus on interoperability between the forces. Each brigade needs to be able to support allied forces to increase force protection, mobility and counter- mobility whilst addressing capability gaps to enhance future operations. This section will look at some of the national engineering commands and their objectives to support allied forces. 1700 – Current engineering programmes for the Brazilian Engineering Materiel Directorate – DME • Future procurement projects surrounding mobility, counter-mobility and survivability • Understanding supplier expertise to enhance Brazilian capabilities • International agreements and the effect on military engineering Colonel Alexandre Nogueira, Deputy Director of the Engineering Materiel Directorate, Brazilian Army 1730 – The Twofold role of the Hellenic Engineer Corps • Increasing force protection through civil and military expertise in construction • The Hellenic military engineering structure and the Army’s formation • Looking to the future engineering contribution of the Engineer Corps Colonel Dimitrios Kourkoulakos, Head of the 2nd Section, Engineers’ Directorate, Hellenic Army General Staff 1745 – Enhancing the operational structure to support national missions in Guatemala • Current objectives to modernise national force protection and infrastructure • Perceived future threats for the armed forces of Guatemala • The department of engineering’s vision and the importance of allied training Major Jorge Giovanni Aquino Guidel, J4 – Sapper Battalion, Department of Engineering, Ministry of Defence of Guatemala 1800 – Anticipating the future – The Netherlands engineering vision • The role of the Centre of Expertise in engineering operations and the future environment • The positive impact of future technological innovations to assist mobility on operation • The engineering capabilities in the Royal Netherlands Army into the next decade Lieutenant Colonel Paul van der Heul, Chief of Military Engineering CoE, Royal Netherlands Army 1830 - Chairman’s summary Major General (Retd) Mungo Melvin CB OBE, Former GOC UK Support Command and Former Colonel Commandant of the Royal Engineers, British Army 1835 - Networking drinks reception in exhibition room Page 4 of 17 Defence Leaders© agenda subject to change depending
Recommended publications
  • Marine Corps Engineer Association History

    Marine Corps Engineer Association History

    Photo from National Archives MARINEMARINE CORPSCORPS ENGINEER ENGINEER ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATION HISTORYHISTORY --201 20177 Engineers Up! - 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS WORLD WAR ONE BY PHIL MARTIN, MSGT(RET) 33 GATE GUARDIAN FOR MARINE CORPS ENGINEER 1312 SCHOOL RETURN OF THE TD 18 BY ROBIN GENTRY, COL(RET) MARINE CORPS ENGINEERS IN VIETNAM BY PHIL 1414 MARTIN, MSGT(RET) AND ROBIN GENTRY, COL(RET) SSGT RECKLESS: KOREAN WAR HERO EXCERPT 22 FROM NANCY LEE WHITE HOFFMAN’S 1992 22 LEATHERNECK ARTICLE FIRST COMBAT ENGINEERS COMMAND 24 24 CHRONOLOGY SECOND COMBAT ENGINEERS COMMAND 31 CHRONOLOGY 31 THIRD COMBAT ENGINEERS COMMAND 37 CHRONOLOGY 37 2 - Engineers Up! 2 WORLD WAR ONE BY PHIL MARTIN, MSGT(RET) Photo from National Archives THE BEGINNINGS It is believed that early man discovered fire, when lightning hit a bog full of moss. This prehistoric man kept the fire going by piling up the moss for cooking and warmth. As man evolved, he invented hunting tools to kill animals, such as the Woolly Mammoth and other fur bearing animals for their skins to make clothes and their meat for food. Roving bands of people attempted to barter for the things they needed or sometimes took the materials they wanted by harming or killing the opposing party. Eventually, mankind learned to cultivate crops allowing him to settle in farms to provide food for his family. With these beginnings of civilization, leaders and councils were picked to organize communities and make decisions for the betterment of the citizenry. The leaders formed governments and declared certain regions for themselves; forming kingdoms, granting councils the ability to make laws, and enforce regulations.
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 9Th May 1995 O.B.E

    Supplement to the London Gazette, 9Th May 1995 O.B.E

    6612 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9TH MAY 1995 O.B.E. in Despatches, Commended for Bravery or Commended for Valuable Service in recognition of gallant and distinguished services To be Ordinary Officers of the Military Division of the said Most in the former Republic of Yugoslavia during the period May to Excellent Order: November 1994: Lieutenant Colonel David Robin BURNS, M.B.E. (500341), Corps of Royal Engineers. Lieutenant Colonel (now Acting Colonel) James Averell DANIELL (487268), The Royal Green Jackets. ARMY Mention in Despatches M.B.E. To be Ordinary Members of the Military Division of the said Most Major Nicholas George BORWELL (504429), The Duke of Excellent Order: Wellington's Regiment. Major Duncan Scott BRUCE (509494), The Duke of Wellington's 2464S210 Corporal Stephen LISTER, The Royal Logistic Corps. Regiment. The Reverend Duncan James Morrison POLLOCK, Q.G.M., 24631429 Sergeant Sean CAINE, The Duke of Wellington's Chaplain to , the Forces 3rd Class (497489), Royal Army Regiment. Chaplains' Department. 24764103 Lance Corporal Carl CHAMBERS, The Duke of 24349345 Warrant Officer Class I (now Acting Captain) Ian Wellington's Regiment. SINCLAIR, Corps of Royal Engineers. 24748686 Lance Corporal (now Acting Corporal) Neil Robert 24682621 Corporal (now Sergeant) Nigel Edwin TULLY, Corps of FARRELL, Royal Army Medical Corps. Royal Engineers. Lieutenant Colonel (now Acting Colonel) John Chalmers McCoLL, Major Alasdair John Campbell WILD (514042), The Royal O.B.E., (495202), The Royal Anglian Regiment. Anglian Regiment. 24852063 Private (now Lance Corporal) Liam Patrick SEVIOUR, The Duke of Wellington's Regiment. ROYAL AIR FORCE O.B.E. Queen's Commendation for Bravery To be an Ordinary Officer of the Military Division of the said Most Excellent Order: 24652732 Corporal Mark David HUGHES, The Duke of Wing Commander (now Group Captain) Andrew David SWEETMAN Wellington's Regiment.
  • XXX Corps Operation MARKET-GARDEN 17 September 1944

    XXX Corps Operation MARKET-GARDEN 17 September 1944

    British XXX Corps Operation MARKET-GARDEN 17 September 1944 XXX Corps DUTCH-BELGIUM BORDER 17 September 1944 ANNEX A: Task Organization to Operation GARDEN XXX Corps LtGen Brian G. HORROCKS Guards Armoured Division Brig Allan H. S. ADAIR 43rd Wessex Division MajGen G. I. THOMAS 50th Northumberland Division MajGen D. A. H. GRAHAM 8th Armoured Brigade Brig Erroll G. PRIOR-PALMER Princess Irene (Royal Netherlands) BrigadeCol Albert “Steve” de Ruyter von STEVENICK Royal Artillery 64th Medium Regiment R.A. 73rd AT Regiment R.A. 27th LAA Regiment R.A. 11th Hussars Sherman tanks of British XXX Corps advance across the bridge at Nijmegen during MARKET-GARDEN. 1 Guards Armoured Division Operation MARKET-GARDEN 17 September 1944 Guards Armoured Division DUTCH-BELGIUM BORDER 17 September 1944 ANNEX A: Task Organization to Operation GARDEN Guards Armoured Division Brig Allan H. S. ADAIR Promoted MajGen ADAIR on 21 Sep 1944 5th Guards Armoured Brigade 2nd Bn, Grenadier Guards (Armor) 1st Bn, Grenadier Guards (Mot) LtCol Edward H. GOULBURN 2nd Bn, Irish Guards (Armor) LtCol Giles VANDELEUR + 3rd Bn, Irish Guards, 32nd Guards Brigade (Mot) LtCol J. O. E. “Joe” VANDELEUR 32nd Guards Infantry Brigade Brig G. F. JOHNSON + 1st Bn, Coldstream Guards, 5th Guards Brigade (Armor) 5th Bn, Coldstream Guards (Mot) 2nd Bn, Welsh Guards (Armor) 1st Bn, Welsh Guards (Mot) Royal Artillery 55th Field Regiment RA 153rd Field Regiment RA 21st AT Regiment RA 94th LAA Regiment + 1st Independent MG Company Royal Engineers 14th Field Squadron 615th Field Squadron 148th Field Park Squadron + 2nd Household Cavalry Regiment RAC XXX Corps Commander, LtGen Horrocks, ordered the Guards Armoured Division to form tank-infantry Battle Groups by pairing each Tank Battalion with an Infantry Battalion.
  • TWICE a CITIZEN Celebrating a Century of Service by the Territorial Army in London

    TWICE a CITIZEN Celebrating a Century of Service by the Territorial Army in London

    TWICE A CITIZEN Celebrating a century of service by the Territorial Army in London www.TA100.co.uk The Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Association for Greater London Twice a Citizen “Every Territorial is twice a citizen, once when he does his ordinary job and the second time when he dons his uniform and plays his part in defence.” This booklet has been produced as a souvenir of the celebrations for the Centenary of the Territorial Field Marshal William Joseph Slim, Army in London. It should be remembered that at the time of the formation of the Rifle Volunteers 1st Viscount Slim, KG, GCB, GCMG, GCVO, GBE, DSO, MC in 1859, there was no County of London, only the City. Surrey and Kent extended to the south bank of the Thames, Middlesex lay on the north bank and Essex bordered the City on the east. Consequently, units raised in what later became the County of London bore their old county names. Readers will learn that Londoners have much to be proud of in their long history of volunteer service to the nation in its hours of need. From the Boer War in South Africa and two World Wars to the various conflicts in more recent times in The Balkans, Iraq and Afghanistan, London Volunteers and Territorials have stood together and fought alongside their Regular comrades. Some have won Britain’s highest award for valour - the Victoria Cross - and countless others have won gallantry awards and many have made the ultimate sacrifice in serving their country. This booklet may be recognised as a tribute to all London Territorials who have served in the past, to those who are currently serving and to those who will no doubt serve in the years to come.
  • Introduction to Mine Clearing Technology

    Introduction to Mine Clearing Technology

    Introduction to Mine Clearing Technology ABSTRACT This paper presents the technologies and methods developed for mine clearing operations currently used by the military and humanitarian demining organisations. In any mine clearing operation, the operating environment and the type of threats are never the same. Thus, a single method or type of equipment rarely constitutes the most successful means of resolving the problem in terms of time, cost and effectiveness; a combination of tools is more commonly employed to ensure a successful mine clearing mission. This paper aims to give an introduction to and appreciation of the key mine clearing methods and equipment, and the key differences and considerations for military and humanitarian operations. The common methods of demining such as manual demining, explosive mine breaching and mechanical demining will be discussed. The design considerations for mine flails on mine clearing vehicles will also be presented. Tan Chun Gary Wong Hock Lye Bryan Soh Chee Weng Introduction to Mine Clearing 118 Technology Despite the initial development of mine INTRODUCTION clearing concepts as a form of countermeasure against mines during wartime, the real need History of Mines for mine clearing usually begins after the end of hostilities. This is attributed to the very Mines, derived from the Latin word ‘Mina’ nature of why mines were laid in the first place meaning ‘vein of ore’ was originally used to – to deter access to and use of land. Mines laid describe the digging of minerals from the during conflicts are rarely removed at the end earth. Over time, it has become a term used of the conflicts due to the lack of proper mine by military engineers to denote the explosives maps, markings, loss of such maps and markings they lay in the ground during battles.
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, Hth June 1997

    Supplement to the London Gazette, Hth June 1997

    B6 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, HTH JUNE 1997 Colonel Patricia Slater PURVES (489113), late 21161497 Warrant Officer Class 1 Omparkash Adjutant General's Corps (ETS). GURUNG, Queen's Gurkha Signals. Brigadier Ashley Ernest George TRULUCK 24126281 Warrant Officer Class 2 (Acting Warrant (486759), late Royal Corps of Signals. Officer Class 1) Richard HALLAM, Corps of Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers. O.B.E. Major William Gerald HERLIHY (535888), Army To be Ordinary Officers of the Military Division of the Air Corps. said Most Excellent Order: Major Barry James HILL (524490), Adjutant General's Corps (ETS). Lieutenant Colonel John Harold BRUNT, T.D. 24705897 Corporal Richard Francis HIRST, Corps of (500521), Corps of Royal Electrical and Mechanical Royal Engineers. Engineers, Territorial Army. 23876392 Staff Sergeant Bruce Howard HOBDAY, Lieutenant Colonel Roger Ian Stuart BURGESS Corps of Royal Electrical and Mechanical (485679), 9th/12th Royal Lancers. Engineers. Lieutenant Colonel Ian Michael CAWS (501567), Major Ian Andrew HORN (527771), Army Physical Corps of Royal Engineers. Training Corps. Lieutenant Colonel Paul NORRINGTON-DAVIES 24569851 Corporal Danny HUDDART, Corps of (493557), The Royal Regiment of Wales. Royal Engineers. Lieutenant Colonel Anthony John HAYHURST 24397424 Warrant Officer Class 1 Michael Brian (486129), Army Air Corps. HUNT, The Royal Logistic Corps. Lieutenant Colonel John Michael MAY (484910), The 24354896 Warrant Officer Class 2 Robert INGHAM, Royal Logistic Corps. Royal Corps of Signals. Lieutenant Colonel (Acting Colonel) Robert Adam Major Roland John LADLEY (512632), The Royal Mungo Simpson MELVIN, M.B.E. (499747), Anglian Regiment. Corps of Royal Engineers. Major David Neal LAMBERT (526777), The Lieutenant Colonel Nicholas John NEWELL Parachute Regiment.
  • Substance and Practice

    Substance and Practice

    SUBSTANCE AND PRACTICE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THE ROYAL ENGINEERS IN CANADA Elizabeth Vincent .... Environment Canada Environnement Canada • ""!"'" Parks Service Service des parcs SUBSTANCE AND PRACTICE BUILDING TECHNOLOGY AND THE ROYAL ENGINEERS IN CANADA Elizabeth Vincent Studies in Archaeology Architecture and History National Historic Sites Parks Service Environment Canada ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1993. Available in Canada through authorized bookstore agents and other book­ stores. or by mail from the Canada Communication Group - Publishing. Supply and Services Canada. Ottawa. Ontario. Canada KIA OS9. Published under the authority of the Minister of the Environment. Ottawa, 1993. Editing: Sheila Ascroft Desktop Production: Lucie Forget Cover: Rod Won Cover illustration: front elevation of the Officers' Quarters. Fredericton, N.B.• 1851. (National Archives of Canada. Map Collection) Parks publishes the results of its research in archaeology, architecture and history. A list of publications is available from National Historic Sites Pub­ lications. Parks Service, Environment Canada. 1600 Liverpool Court, Ot­ tawa. Ontario. Canada KIA OH3. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Vincent. Elizabeth Substance and practice: building technology and the Royal Engineers in Canada (Studies in archaeology, architecture and history. ISSN 0821-1027) Issued also in French under title: Le Genie royal au Canada, materiaux et techniques de construction. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN Q-660-14820-X DSS cat. no. R61-2/9-60E 1. Great Britain - Army - Military construction operations - History ­ 19th century. 2. Canada - History, Military - 19th century. 3. Building materials - Canada - History - 19th century. 1. Canadian Parks Service. National Historic Sites. Il, Title. Ill. Series. UG413.V561993 725' .18'0971 C93-099413-2 ~~_ll~~ .~(~~ _ <:OIl1I1lUnic..ition Cnmmunicutiou Ii --_._--~-_.._-_._--.- - I'uhtishin/.! FJitill1l TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword.
  • Fm 3-34.170/Mcwp 3-17.4 (Fm 5-170)

    Fm 3-34.170/Mcwp 3-17.4 (Fm 5-170)

    FM 3-34.170/MCWP 3-17.4 (FM 5-170) ENGINEER RECONNAISSANCE March 2008 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online <www.us.army.mil> and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at <http://www.train.army.mil>. *FM 3-34.170/MCWP 3-17.4 (FM 5-170) Field Manual Headquarters No. 3-34.170/MCWP 3-17.4 (5-170) Department of the Army Washington, DC, 25 March 2008 Engineer Reconnaissance Contents Page PREFACE ............................................................................................................vii INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................ix Chapter 1 ENGINEER RECONNAISSANCE ..................................................................... 1-1 Engineer Functions............................................................................................. 1-1 Army Warfighting Functions ............................................................................... 1-3 Engineer Reconnaissance ................................................................................. 1-4 Engineer Reconnaissance Team Capabilities and Limitations.......................... 1-9 Chapter 2 INTEGRATING ENGINEER RECONNAISSANCE CAPABILITIES ................. 2-1 Enabling Information Superiority ........................................................................ 2-1 Integrating Assured Mobility
  • Royal Artillery Barracks and Royal Military Repository Areas

    Royal Artillery Barracks and Royal Military Repository Areas

    CHAPTER 7 Royal Artillery Barracks and Royal Military Repository Areas Lands above Woolwich and the Thames valley were taken artillery companies (each of 100 men), headquartered with JOHN WILSON ST for military use from 1773, initially for barracks facing their guns in Woolwich Warren. There they assisted with Woolwich Common that permitted the Royal Regiment of Ordnance work, from fuse­filling to proof supervising, and Artillery to move out of the Warren. These were among also provided a guard. What became the Royal Regiment Britain’s largest barracks and unprecedented in an urban of Artillery in 1722 grew, prospered and spread. By 1748 ARTILLERY PLACE Greenhill GRAND DEPOT ROAD context. The Board of Ordnance soon added a hospi­ there were thirteen companies, and further wartime aug­ Courts tal (now Connaught Mews), built in 1778–80 and twice mentations more than doubled this number by the end CH REA ILL H enlarged during the French Wars. Wartime exigencies also of the 1750s. There were substantial post­war reductions saw the Royal Artillery Barracks extended to their present in the 1760s, and in 1771 the Regiment, now 2,464 men, Connaught astonishing length of more than a fifth of a mile 0( .4km) was reorganized into four battalions each of eight com­ Mews in 1801–7, in front of a great grid of stables and more panies, twelve of which, around 900 men, were stationed barracks, for more than 3,000 soldiers altogether. At the in Woolwich. Unlike the army, the Board of Ordnance D St George’s A same time more land westwards to the parish boundary required its officers (Artillery and Engineers) to obtain Royal Artillery Barracks Garrison Church GRAND DEPOT RD O R was acquired, permitting the Royal Military Repository to a formal military education.
  • Transnistria – a “Bridge Head” of the Russian Federation for Attacking Ukraine

    Transnistria – a “Bridge Head” of the Russian Federation for Attacking Ukraine

    TRANSNISTRIA – A “BRIDGE HEAD” OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR ATTACKING UKRAINE Colonel Ion-Marius NICOLAE, PhD* Motto: ,,Nobody should fantasize about the possibility to gain military superiority against Russia. We will never allow this to happen.” Vladimir Putin Abstract: The breakaway republic - de facto state - of Transnistria has steadily been edging closer and closer to Russia, but the Kremlin does not seem all that enthusiastic. The EU ought to take specific action to prevent Moldova from becoming the next victim of Russian aggression. Transnistria could represent a Russian, bridge head in the East of Europe. There is a real chance that the breakaway region in the Eastern part of the country, the Transnistrian republic, might follow in the footsteps of Crimea and be accepted into the Russian Federation as a new federal subject. The annexation of Crimea by force dramatically changes the security situation in the Black Sea region. After the annexation of Crimea (March 2014) by the Russian Federation, UN observers are trying to figure out what is going on with Russian Federation troops on the Ukrainian border. As a result of the talks, the subject of Republic of Transnistria was also reached. * Head of department/ Romanian Land Forces Staff, email: [email protected]; [email protected] 133 Colonel Ion-Marius NICOLAE, PhD Fig. 1- Annexation of the Crimea by the Russian Federation (March 2014) The Russian Federation reserves the right to intervene anywhere on the territory of the former Soviet republics. If the Russian Federation were to take over Transnistria, Ukraine would have Russian troops on three borders instead of two.
  • Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security for More Information on This Publication, Visit

    Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security for More Information on This Publication, Visit

    Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security Russia, NATO, C O R P O R A T I O N STEPHEN J. FLANAGAN, ANIKA BINNENDIJK, IRINA A. CHINDEA, KATHERINE COSTELLO, GEOFFREY KIRKWOOD, DARA MASSICOT, CLINT REACH Russia, NATO, and Black Sea Security For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RRA357-1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0568-5 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2020 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Cover graphic by Dori Walker, adapted from a photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Weston Jones. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The Black Sea region is a central locus of the competition between Russia and the West for the future of Europe.
  • 9 » Combined Arms Breaching^Qperations

    9 » Combined Arms Breaching^Qperations

    ^°: 13 -1 ¿¡s 9 ^í? ô » J_. klS-1 Combined Arms Breaching^Qperations HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ¿?2&°n"ÍS S*** 00 ' X>3l0-t'£050 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. m FM 90-13-1 Cl CHANGE HEADQUARTERS NO. 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 7 May 1993 COMBINED ARMS BREACHING OPERATIONS 1. Change FM 90-13-1, 28 February 1991, as follows: Remove old pages Insert new pages iii and iv iii and iv Appendices pages D-l through D-15 and E-l through E-16 Glossary-1 through Glossary-10 Glossary-1 through Glossary-12 Reference-1 Reference-1 and Reference-2 Index-1 through Index-4 Index-1 through Index-4 2. A star (★) marks new or changed material. 3. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication. DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. By Order of the Secretary of the Army: GORDON R. SULLIVAN General, United States Army Chief of Staff Official: vLJfcr MILTON H. HAMILTON Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army 03652 Pentagon i.ihrer y (ANR-FL) ATTN: i/'üi'T imerits SsctiO® Room l/\hlo, rOntagon Washington. DC 20310-6050 DISTRIBUTION: Active Army, USAR, and ARNG: To be distributed in accordance with DA Form 12-11-E, requirements for FM 90-13-1, Combined Arms Breaching Operations (Qty rqr block no. 5012). I % Field Manual 90-13-1 HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 28 February 1991 Combined Arms Breaching Operations Contents PREFACE iv CHAPTER 1. CHALLENGE TO MANEUVER 1-1 CHAPTER 2.