DOCSLIB.ORG

Esp Conservation Assessment and Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Esp Conservation Assessment and Action Plan ESP CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND ACTION PLAN 9 JUNE 2006 This publication was produced by Development Alternatives, Inc. for the United States Agency for International Development under Contract No. 497-M-00-05-00005-00 Photo credit: Asep Mulyana, ESP Jakarta/West Java Cover story: An activity conducted in June 3, 2006 by several members of Cikundul-Cilaku Sub Watershed Environment Guardian Forum. They are measuring quality water stream of Cikundul Sub Watershed. The picture is taken in Cisarua River, Nusantara Flower Garden, Kawungluwuk Village, Pacet Sub District, Cianjur District, located at 107° 04' 40,3 E and 06° 43' 21,1 S. ESP CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND ACTION PLAN Title: ESP Conservation Assessment and Action Plan. Program, activity, or project number: Environmental Services Program, DAI Project Number: 5300201. Strategic objective number: SO No. 2, Higher Quality Basic Human Services Utilized (BHS). Sponsoring USAID office and contract number: USAID/Indonesia, Contract number: 497-M-00-05-00005- 00. Contractor name: DAI. Date of publication: June 9, 2006. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................ I 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2. ASSESSMENT OF HIGH BIODIVERSITY VALUE AREAS IN ESP HIGH PRIORITY WATERSHEDS - OTHER THAN PROTECTED AREAS...................................................... 5 2.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................5 2.2. PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................................................................7 2.3. PROCESS .....................................................................................................................................................8 2.3.1. ESP mandated criteria...................................................................................................................................8 2.3.2. Other Watershed Selection Indicators................................................................................................... 11 2.3.3. Clarification and Justification of Biodiversity Selection Indicators ................................................... 11 2.3.4. Assessment of criteria................................................................................................................................. 16 2.3.4.1. Field Information......................................................................................................................................16 2.3.4.2. Field plus Literature Information .........................................................................................................16 2.3.4.3. Analysis of Field plus Literature Information.....................................................................................17 2.3.4.4. Field Trial in Central Java.......................................................................................................................17 3. ASSESSMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS IN ESP HIGH PRIORITY PROVINCES.18 3.1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................... 18 3.1.1. Categories of protected areas in Indonesia.......................................................................................... 19 3.2. PROTECTION AREAS IN JAVA ................................................................................................................ 20 3.2.1. West Java ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2. Central Java................................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.3. East Java ........................................................................................................................................................ 21 3.3. PROTECTION AREAS IN SUMATRA ........................................................................................................ 22 3.3.1. West Sumatra.............................................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.2. North Sumatra............................................................................................................................................. 23 3.3.3. Aceh................................................................................................................................................................. 23 4. ESP SITE-BASED CONSERVATION PLANNING & MANAGEMENT .................... 24 4.1. PRINCIPALS.............................................................................................................................................. 24 4.2. PRACTICE: DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT ACTION PLANS ............................................................ 27 4.2.1. General........................................................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.2. Prioritize the HCV Focus Areas................................................................................................................ 27 4.2.3. Identify Stakeholder Groups for Conservation Planning of HCV areas......................................... 27 4.2.4. Evaluate Existing Spatial Plans/Work Plans......................................................................................... 28 4.2.5. Conduct Information Gap Analysis ......................................................................................................... 29 4.2.6. Select a workshop facilitator and the facilitation process ................................................................ 31 4.2.7. Identify Conservation Objectives (targets) in each Watershed Focus Area................................. 31 4.2.8. Analyze Threats to Each Conservation Objective (target)................................................................ 32 4.2.9. Conduct Stakeholder Threat Source/Cause Analysis ......................................................................... 33 4.2.10. Conduct a Situation or feasibility Analysis............................................................................................. 33 4.2.11. Preparation of the Management Action Plan..................................................................................... 33 4.2.12. Public Awareness Campaigns to Support Management Plans........................................................ 34 4.2.13. ESP/SOW Requirements for Management Plan Implementation.................................................. 34 4.2.14. Overall Watershed Management Action Plans ................................................................................... 35 4.2.15. Organizational Structure and Function of Watershed Forums....................................................... 35 4.2.16. ESP/SOW Requirements for Scaling Up and Achieving National-level Impact .......................... 36 4.2.17. Monitoring & Evaluation (M & E) .......................................................................................................... 36 4.2.18. Alternative finance mechanism (PES) for conservation activities in upper watersheds............ 39 5. ESP POTENTIAL ACTIVITIES IN SPECIFIC PROTECTED AREAS ....................... 47 5.1. JAVA ......................................................................................................................................................... 47 5.1.1. West Java ...................................................................................................................................................... 47 5.1.2. Central Java................................................................................................................................................... 53 5.1.3. East Java ........................................................................................................................................................ 59 5.2. SUMATRA................................................................................................................................................. 62 5.2.1. Banda Aceh................................................................................................................................................... 62 5.2.2. North Sumatra............................................................................................................................................. 67 5.2.3. West Sumatra.............................................................................................................................................. 69 6. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 79 7. APPENDICES ................................................................................................................... 83 APPENDIX I. MATRIX OF CRITERIA RANKS TO PRIORITIZE WATERSHEDS FOR ESP ACTIVITIES IN CENTRAL JAVA IN 2006. ........................................................................................................................................................ 83 II EXECUTIVE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 35 Konservasi Danau Ranu Pane Dan Ranu Regulo Di
    (2019), 16(1): 35-50 pISSN: 0216 – 0439 eISSN: 2540 – 9689 http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/JPHKA Akreditasi Kemenristekdikti Nomor 21/E/KPT/2018 KONSERVASI DANAU RANU PANE DAN RANU REGULO DI TAMAN NASIONAL BROMO TENGGER SEMERU (Conservation of Ranu Pane and Ranu Regulo Lakes in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park) Reny Sawitri* dan/and Mariana Takandjandji Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hutan Jl. Gunung Batu No. 5 Bogor, Jawa Barat, Indonesia Tlp. (0251) 8633234; Fax (0251) 8638111 Info artikel: ABSTRACT Keywords: The lakes in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park (BTSNP) have a caldera or giant crater, Conservation, however, the intensification of land use surounding as a residential area, agricultural land ecosystems, lakes, and natural tourism gived the impacts to lakes. The study was carried out at lakes of Ranu pollution, Pane and Ranu Regulo, in Bromo Tengger Semeru National Park (TNBTS), East Java water quality Province. The study purposed to know ecosystem changing of lakes and recomendation of conservation strategies. The research method was carried out by analyzing water qualities (physic, chemitry and microbiology) of Ranu Pane and ranu Regulo lakes. The results of this study found that Ranu Pane lake ecosystem was invaded by a threshold (Salvinia molesta Mitchell) of about 80%, causing an increase in BOD and COD content, followed by a decrease in DO and pH. Lake of Ranu Regulo has a higher fertility value (N/P = 16.24) than Ranu Pane. Therefore, the management need to mitigate to reduce the risk of pollution through public awareness and tourists. Kata kunci: ABSTRAK Konservasi, ekosistem, danau, Danau di Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru (TNBTS) adalah kaldera atau kawah pencemaran, raksasa, tetapi intensifikasi pemanfaatan lahan di sekitar danau berupa pemukiman, lahan kualitas air pertanian dan pariwisata alam berdampak terhadap danau.
    [Show full text]
  • Bathymetric Survey of Lakes Maninjau and Diatas (West Sumatra), and Lake Kerinci (Jambi)
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Recent citations Bathymetric survey of lakes Maninjau and Diatas - The sediments of Lake Singkarak and Lake Maninjau in West Sumatra reveal (West Sumatra), and lake Kerinci (Jambi) their earthquake, volcanic and rainfall history Katleen Wils et al To cite this article: C Bouvet de Maisonneuve et al 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1185 012001 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 159.149.207.220 on 22/06/2021 at 10:25 The 2018 International Conference on Research and Learning of Physics IOP Publishing IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1185 (2019) 012001 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012001 Bathymetric survey of lakes Maninjau and Diatas (West Sumatra), and lake Kerinci (Jambi) C Bouvet de Maisonneuve1,2*, S Eisele1,2, F Forni1,2, Hamdi3, E Park1, M Phua1,2, and R Putra3 1Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 2Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 3Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia *[email protected] Abstract. Determining the bathymetry of lakes is important to assess the potential and the vulnerability of this valuable resource. The dilution and circulation of nutrients or pollutants is largely dependant on the volume of water and the incoming and outgoing fluxes, while the degree and frequency of mixing depends on the water depth. The bathymetry of lakes is also important to understand the spatial distribution of sediments, which in turn are valuable archives of natural hazards and environmental change.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of Project Boundary to Facilitate Measuring and Monitoring of Carbon Stocks
    DETERMINATION OF PROJECT BOUNDARY TO FACILITATE MEASURING AND MONITORING OF CARBON STOCKS Ari Wibowo RM Wiwied Widodo Nugroho ITTO PD 519/08/Rev.1 (F): In Cooperation with Forestry Research and Development Agency Ministry of Forestry, Indonesia Bogor, 2010 DETERMINATION OF PROJECT BOUNDARY TO FACILITATE MEASURING AND MONITORING OF CARBON STOCKS ISBN 978-602-95842-6-4 Technical Report No 3. Bogor, May 2010. By: Ari Wibowo, RM Wiwied Widodo, and Nugroho This report is a part of Program “Tropical Forest Conservation for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and Enhancing Carbon Stocks in Meru Betiri National Park, Indonesia” Collaboration between: • Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Departemen Kehutanan (Center For Socio Economic and Policy on Forestry Research Ministry of Forestry) Jl. Gunung Batu No. 5 Bogor West Java Indonesia Phone : +62-251-8633944 Fax. : +62-251-8634924 Email : [email protected] Website : HUhttp://ceserf-itto.puslitsosekhut.web.idU • LATIN – the Indonesian Tropical Institute Jl. Sutera No. 1 Situgede Bogor West Java Indonesia Phone : +62-251-8425522/8425523 Fax. : +62-251-8626593 Emai : [email protected] and [email protected] Website : HUwww.latin.or.idUH • Meru Betiri National Park Department of Forestry Jalan Siriwijaya 53, Jember, East Java, Indonesia Phone : +62-331-335535 Fax. : +62-331-335535 Email : [email protected] Website : HUwww.merubetiri.comU This work is copyright. Except for the logos, graphical and textual information in this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part provided that it is not sold or put to commercial use and its source is acknowledged. LIST OF CONTENT LIST OF CONTENT ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cepf Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT I. BASIC DATA Organization Legal Name: Conservation International -- Indonesia Project Title (as stated in the grant agreement): Siberut Island Conservation Program: Building Multi-level Commitment to Conservation Implementation Partners for this Project: Project Dates (as stated in the grant agreement): April 1, 2005 - July 31, 2007 Date of Report (month/year): October 1, 2007 II. OPENING REMARKS Siberut has long been acknowledged as a conservation priority, featuring high levels of endemism (including four endemic primate species). Nearly half the island (190,500 ha) has been gazetted as a National Park, and all of Siberut has been proclaimed as a Biosphere Reserve, yet the entirety of the island remains threatened by conversion and commercial logging activities because the government perceives that biodiversity conservation is not an incentive to the regional revenue that can be brought in by development. Outside the Siberut National Park, approximately 123,000 ha of intact forest remain on the island. An active commercial timber concession (KAM) that started operating in 2001, threatens to destroy at least 50,000 ha of this remainder of this unharmed forest, and another 49,500 ha was planned to be granted to PT Salaki Summa Sejahtera (PT SSS) timber concession. After intensive advocacy and policy efforts, in May 2003, the Ministry of Forestry cancelled the preliminary permit for the Siberut logging concession held by PT SSS. Following the cancellation, we learned that PT SSS intended to appeal this decision and pursue legal action against the Ministry of Forestry, by filing a lawsuit on the grounds of procedural irregularity in the denial of the concession.
    [Show full text]
  • IN COSTA RICA B
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO AN INTEGRATED CONTROL PROGRAMME OF HYPS1PYLA GRANDELLA (ZELLER) IN COSTA RICA b *m&& C* VL>" -;-.,-* d Comparison of the effect of aequous leaf extract of the Australian cedar (bottom specimens in a, b and c) with that of Spanish cedar (top specimens in a, b and c) incorporated in diet, on the mahogany shootborer. a. After 14day s of feeding, b.Afte r 24 days of feeding, c.Pupa e obtained after 28 days and 40 days from diet mixtures containing Spanish cedar and Australian cedar respectively, d. Adult with shortened wingsreare d on diet con­ taining Australian cedar. For accompanying text refer to chapters 2.1.3. and 3. yVA/ 8lOl /b(p P. GRIJPMA CONTRIBUTIONS TO AN INTEGRATED CONTROL PROGRAMME OF HYPSIPYLA GRANDELLA (ZELLER) IN COSTA RICA (MET EEN SAMENVATTING IN HET NEDERLANDS) UIBLIOTHIBK J"- DEH JLAHDBOWHOCrESCHOOI, WAGESI NGE N PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR IN DE LANDBOUWWETENSCHAPPEN, OP GEZAG VAN DE RECTOR MAGNIFICUS, DR. IR. H. A. LENIGER, HOOGLERAAR IN DE TECHNOLOGIE, IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP VRIJDAG 20 DECEMBER 1974 DES NAMIDDAGS TE VIER UUR IN DE AULA VAN DE LANDBOUWHOGESCHOOL TE WAGENINGEN /, ' '/$ Dit proefschrift met stellingen van PIETER GRIJPMA landbouwkundig ingenieur, geboren te Bandoeng, Indonesie, op 7 april 1932, is goedgekeurd door de promotoren Dr. J. de Wilde, hoogleraar in het dierkundige deel van de plantenziektenkunde en door Dr. L. M. Schoonhoven, hoogleraar in de algemene en vergelijkende dierfysiologie. De Rector Magnificus van de Landbouwhogeschool, H. A. Leniger Wageningen, 16 September 1974. nn : — Stellingen Inee ngeintegreer dbestrijdingsprogramm ava nHypsipyl averdien t hetaanbevelin gplantmateriaa lva nMeliaceee nt egebruiken , waarvand enieuw elote nsynchroo ne nweini gfrequen tuitlopen .
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Volcano Disaster Assistance Program in Indonesia
    Final Report: Evaluation of the USAID/OFDA- USGS Volcano Disaster Assistance Program in Indonesia November 2012 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI). EVALUATION OF THE USAID/OFDA USGS VOLCANO DISASTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IN INDONESIA Contracted under RAN-I-00-09-00016-00, Task Order Number AID-OAA-TO-12-00038 Evaluation of the USAID/OFDA - USGS Volcano Disaster Assistance Program in Indonesia. Authors: Laine Berman, Ann von Briesen Lewis, John Lockwood, Erlinda Panisales, Joeni Hartanto Acknowledgements The evaluation team is grateful to many people in Washington DC, Vancouver, WA, Jakarta, Bandung, Jogjakarta, Tomohon, North Sulawesi and points in between. Special thanks to the administrative and support people who facilitated our extensive travels and the dedicated VDAP and CVGHM staff who work daily to help keep people safe. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Evaluation of the USAID/OFDA- USGS Volcano Disaster Assistance Program in Indonesia TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................................. i ACRONYMS ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Assessment on the Trade in Marine Turtles in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam Lalita Gomez Kanitha Krishnasamy Stealthc4 \ Dreamstime \ Stealthc4
    NOVEMBER 2019 A Rapid Assessment on the Trade in Marine Turtles in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam Lalita Gomez Kanitha Krishnasamy stealthc4 \ dreamstime stealthc4 \ TRAFFIC REPORT A Rapid Assessment on the Trade in Marine Turtles in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam TRAFFIC is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. Reprod uction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. \dreamstime stealthc4 The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organisations con- cern ing the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published by TRAFFIC, Southeast Asia Regional Ofce, Suite 12A-01, Level 12A, Tower 1, Wisma AmFirst, Jalan Stadium SS 7/15, 47301 Kelana Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia Telephone : (603) 7880 3940 Fax : (603) 7882 0171 © TRAFFIC 2019. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. ISBN no: 978-983-3393-85-5 UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Suggested citation: Gomez, L. and Krishnasamy, K. (2019). A Rapid Assessment on the Trade in Marine stealthc4 \dreamstime stealthc4 Turtles in Indonesia, Malaysia and Viet Nam. TRAFFIC. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. Green Sea Turtle Chelonia mydas © Willyambradberry/ Dreamstime.com Design by Faril Izzadi Mohd Noor This communication has been produced under contract to CITES and with the fnancial assistance of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 6D5n Lake Toba – Bohorok Tour
    Warmest Greetings from Universal Tour & Travel has been established since 1966 and is one of the leading Travel Company in Indonesia. Along with our experienced and professional managers and tour- guides in the year 2016, we are ready to serve you for the coming 50 years. We appreciate very much for your trust and cooperation to us in the past and are looking forward to your continued support in the future. We wish 2016 will bring luck and prosperity to all of us. Jakarta, 01 January 2016 The Management of Universal Tour & Travel Table of Contents - Introduction 3 - Company Profile 4 - Our Beautiful Indonesia 5 - Sumatera 6 - Java 16 - Bali 40 - Lombok 48 - Kalimantan 56 - Sulawesi 62 - Irian Jaya 71 3 Company Profile Registered Name : PT. Chandra Universal Travel (Universal Tour & Travel) Established on : August 26, 1966 License No. : 100/D.2/BPU/IV/79 Member of : IATA, ASITA, ASTINDO, EKONID Management - Chairman : Dipl Ing. W.K. Chang - Executive Director : Hanien Chang - Business Development Director : Hadi Saputra Kurniawan - Tour Manager : I Wayan Subrata - Asst. Tour Manager : Ika Setiawaty - Travel Consultant Manager : Nuni - Account Manager : Sandhyana Company Activities - Ticketing (Domestic and International) - Inbound Tours - Travel Documents - Domestic Tours - Car & Bus Rental - Outbound Tours - Travel Insurance - Hotel Reservation Universal Tour & Travel was founded by Mr. Chang Chean Cheng (Chandra Kusuma) on 26 August 1966 and member of IATA in 1968 respectively. In the year between 1966 -1970, there were around 200 travel agents with or without travel agent licence and around 35 IATA agents. Our company started from 8-12 staffs in charged for Ticketing, Inbound Tour and Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin No124-03-13
    SOCIETE DE VOLCANOLOGIE GENEVE C.P. 75, CH-1261 LE VAUD, SUISSE (www.volcan.ch FAX 022/786 22 46, E-MAIL: [email protected]) 124Bulletin mensuel GENEVE SOMMAIRE BULLETIN SVG N0 124, MARS 2013 Nouvelles de la Société p. 3 Activité volcanique p. 4 MOIS PROCHAIN Etna Focal p. 5-6 Nous partirons au Kilauea et voyagerons Stromboli dans le temps à la rencontre du volca- Point de Mire p. 7-9 nisme de Terre Neuve Karthala Récit de voyage p. 10-24 Indonésie (1er partie) IMPRESSUM DERNIERES MINUTES -DERNIERES MINUTES Bulletin de la SVG No124, 2013, 24p, 240 ex. Rédacteurs SVG: P.Vetsch , J.Metzger & B.Poyer (Uniquement destiné aux membres SVG, No non disponible à la vente dans le commerce sans usage commercial). Cotisation annuelle (01.01.13- 31.12.13) SVG: 70.- CHF (50.- Euro)/soutien 100.- CHF (80.- Euro) ou plus. Suisse: CCP 12-16235-6 IBAN CH88 0900 0000 WHITE ISLAND 1201 6235 6 (NLLE-ZELAND) légère diminution Paiement membres étrangers: d’activité, mais risque RIB, Banque 18106, Guichet d’explosions reste 00034, Nocompte 95315810050, possible Clé 96. IBAN (autres pays que la France): http://www.gns.cri.nz/Home/Learning/Science-Topics/ FR76 1810 6000 3495 3158 1005 Volcanoes/New-Zealand-Volcanoes/White-Island/White- 096 BIC AGRIFRPP881 Island-latest Imprimé avec l’appui de: et une Fondation Privée Le Semeru depuis Gunung Sawur (© Photo P.Rollini) RAPPEL : BULLETIN SVG SOUS FORME ÉLECTRONIQUE ET SITE WEB En plus des membres du comité Les personnes intéressées par SVG de la SVG, nous remercions N.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia Discovery
    INDONESIA DISCOVERY Sample Itinerary INDONESIA DISCOVERY | OVERVIEW ITINERARY OVERVIEW INDONESIA DISCOVERY Jakarta, Bandung, Yogyakarta, Bromo, Kalibaru, Bali FEATURED Jakarta City EXPERIENCES Bogor Botanical Garden and Tea Plantation Tangkuban Perahu Crater Angklung – Traditional Bamboo Instrument Visit Kampung Naga, a Sundanese Village Dieng Crater Discover Arjuna Temple, Borobudur Temple and Prambanan Temple Explore Yogyakarta Malang City Tour Sunrise at Mount Bromo and Ride a Horse Kalibaru Village – Agricultural Heritage INDONESIA DISCOVERY | SAMPLE ITINERARY ITINERARY DAY 1 On arrival at Jakarta International Airport you will be met with our guide and then transfer to hotel. Jakarta, the Capital, is the largest city. It is located on the north- ARRIVAL JAKARTA western coast of the island of Java. Jakarta is the country economic, cultural and political center. It is the most populous city in Indonesia. Jakarta city as the biggest city and most developed city in Indonesia has long history and offers old heritage or historical places traditional activity up to modern recreation and entertainment. DAY 2 In the morning your guide will pick you up from your hotel and start the overland journey to visit Bogor. Drive to Bogor is about 1,5 hours, you’ll begin with visit the beautiful BOGOR BOTANICAL GARDEN & town of Bogor located at the site one of the world’s most outstanding botanical TEA PLANTATION gardens. The Bogor Botanical Gardens host more than 15.000 species of trees and plants and over 5.000 species of tropical orchid. Spend time walking around the gardens and enjoying the beautiful landscapes. From the Garden can be seen Bogor’s Presidential Palace, which is noted for its distinctive architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION CONCESSION Reconciliatory Effort Between the Demand of Increasing Local Revenue and Ecosystem Protection in the Process of Power Devolution
    FINAL REPORT Feasibility Study of CONSERVATION CONCESSION Reconciliatory effort between the demand of increasing local revenue and ecosystem protection in the process of power devolution A Case Study From Siberut Island, Sumatra Prepared by: Ary S. Suhandi, Dessy Anggraeni, Elfian Effendi, Erwin A. Perbatakusuma, Koen J.M. Meyers and Wiratno CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL INDONESIA Jakarta, April 2002 CONTENTS A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1 B. THE PROFILE OF SIBERUT ISLAND B.1. Biogeography of the Island 4 B.2. Ecosystem Variety, Biodiversity and Charismatic Species 4 B.2.1. Ecosystem Type and Spatial Sensitivity 4 B.2.2. Biodiversity and Endemism 8 B.2.3. Flagship species and the threat of extinction 10 B.3. Physical Condition of the Island 12 B.4. Demography, Economy, Cultures, Social and Politics B.4.1. Primary School Graduate and Richness of Traditional Knowledge 13 B.4.2. Traditional Economic Practices 14 B.4.3. Customary System: The Accentuation to Traditional Community Rights 16 B.4.4. The Political Absence (Status-Quo) and the Discontinuation of Local Development 19 C. NATIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT 21 D. THREATS TO THE LOWLAND FOREST OF SIBERUT ISLAND 23 E. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE FEASIBILITY STUDY E.1. The Concept of Conservation Concession Approach: an Initial Exploration 26 E.2. Conservation Concession Support Policy Analysis E.2.1. Forest Area Management Policy 29 E.2.2. Acquisition of Conservation Concession Area Policy 35 E.2.3. Public Accountability and Community Involvement Policy 38 E.2.4. Fiscal Decentralization Policy 40 E.3. Justification for Conservation Concession in Siberut Island E.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]