DOCSLIB.ORG

KATZ-DISSERTATION-2016.Pdf (9.545Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Arma virumque: The Significance of Spoils in Roman Culture The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Katz, Rebecca Aileen. 2016. Arma virumque: The Significance of Spoils in Roman Culture. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33493290 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Arma virumque: The Significance of Spoils in Roman Culture A dissertation presented by Rebecca Aileen Katz to The Department of the Classics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Ancient History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2016 © 2016 R. A. Katz All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Professor Emma Dench Rebecca Aileen Katz Arma virumque: The Significance of Spoils in Roman Culture Abstract This dissertation explores the significance of spoils and the practice of spoils-taking in Roman culture. Working from the premise that spoils in the classical sense (Latin spolia, exuviae) are items singled out for their symbolic value and accordingly subjected to different treatment than other war booty (Latin praeda, manubiae), I begin by examining arma, one of the primary targets of despoliation, in order to show how this symbolic value is generated based on the identity of the spoils’ original owners. From there I show that the value of spoils depends directly upon the virtus (i.e. “manliness” as demonstrated primarily through courage or prowess in combat) of the parties involved in taking and giving them, as shown by cases involving male figures who lack this quality or female figures who exhibit it. In the following two chapters I propose a model of “inheritance by conquest”: that spoils are earned through successful acts of virtus and can thereafter be deployed as handles by which to manipulate the identity of their original owners. In order to demonstrate this model at work, I trace several case studies that highlight the role of spoils as symbolic capital in the context of aristocratic competition, as well as the transformation of two spoils traditions (the laurel-wreath and the spolia opima) during the transition from Republic to Empire. Finally, I look to related phenomena, including headhunting and other human trophy collecting, relic culture, and architectural spolia, to help illuminate the dual nature of spoils as both proofs and remembrances of victory and victim. iii Contents Acknowledgments vi List of Figures viii Introduction 1 I. Dressed to Kill: Arma and the Construction of Identity 11 II. Virtus Unmanned: Warmaidens, Boy Soldiers, and the Engendering of Value 79 III. Victor | Victoria: Inheritance by Conquest 147 IV. Spolia Augusta: Afterlives and Transformations 222 V. Off with Your Head: Men and the Art of Monumental Violence 304 Conclusion 366 Appendix 370 Bibliography 374 iv D M feliculis carissimis v Acknowledgments There are many people who deserve my thanks for their support. First must come Emma Dench, who has been a steadfast and superlative mentor for over seven years. Her sense of humor has kept me sane and her advice has been indispensable at every turn in the road from prospective graduate student to prospective faculty member. I am indebted also to Kathleen Coleman for setting an inspirational example of scholarship. Her encyclopedic knowledge of history and texts both ancient and modern has greatly improved this work, and her careful reading and attention to detail have saved me from numerous errors. (Those that have escaped are of course mine alone.) Christopher Krebs first embarked with me on an exploration of spoils in the ancient world, and I greatly appreciate his willingness to see this project through even from the opposite coast. I am a better thinker for his insightful questions and comments. Carmen Arnold-Biucchi has been a wonderful mentor and a cherished guide to the world of numismatics. Both she and Mary McWilliams have been constant sources of support and good cheer in good times and in bad alike. Words will not suffice for my incomparable cohort: Sarah Lannom, who has shared with me all the trials and tribulations of graduate school; James Townshend, whose wit and wisdom have helped me survive the gauntlet of the Ivory Tower; and Julian Yolles and Tom Keeline, who are always ready to share a good story and who have paved the way ahead. I am grateful also to numerous faculty and friends at both Princeton and Harvard. I must name Ted Champlin, Yelena Baraz, and Brent Shaw for their continued guidance and unflagging vi support, both moral and academic, which have only grown since I left the orange bubble for the crimson; and Amy Koenig and Alex Forte, who have seemed all too happy to lend an ear considering how often they have been subjected to some of the most inane and random thoughts. Megan McNall and Mackenzie Bushy have also been immensely patient with their often eccentric friend and have been instrumental in making me acknowledge the outside world every now and then. None of this would have been possible without my family, especially my parents, who have always been there to support me, who have insisted on seeing me through to the end in this too (as in everything else), and who took exceptional care of my furry companions when I could not. vii List of Figures 1.1: Detail of the census frieze from the Altar of Domitius Ahenobarbus. Rome, late 2nd century B.C. 30 1.2: Cenotaph of M. Caelius T.f. Colonia Ulpia Traiana (Xanten), Germania Inferior, c. A.D. 9. CIL 40 XIII 8648. 1.3: Funerary monument of T. Calidius P.f. Severus. Carnuntum, Pannonia Superior, 40 1st century A.D. CIL III 11213. 1.4: Denarius of the Marsic Confederation. Uncertain mint in Italy, 90–89 B.C. HN Italy 420. 57 2.1: Denarius of P. Crepusius. Rome, 82 B.C. RRC 361/1a. 90 2.2: Sestertius of Claudius. Rome, A.D. 50–54. RIC I2 Claudius 114. 90 2.3: Denarius of P. Fonteius P. f. Capito. Rome, 55 B.C. RRC 429/1. 92 2.4: Detail of the funerary monument of Sex. Valerius Genialis. Britain, late 1st–early 2nd 93 century A.D. CIL VII 68 = RIB I 109. 2.5: Detail of the funerary monument of T. Flavius Bassus. Colonia Claudia Ara Agrippinensium 93 (Cologne), Germania Inferior, late 1st century A.D. CIL XIII 8308. 2.6: Sestertius of Trajan. Rome, A.D. 103–107. Woytek 203b = RIC II Trajan 534. 94 2.7: Tondo from the south side of the Arch of Constantine: Hadrian (recarved as Constantine) 95 hunting a bear. Rome, originally c. A.D. 123–138. 2.8: Tondo from the north side of the Arch of Constantine: Hadrian (recarved as Constantine) 95 hunting a boar. Rome, originally c. A.D. 123–138. 2.9: Cancelleria Relief B (profectio). Detail. Rome, second half of the 1st century A.D. 122 3.1: Torso of an emperor in armor, second half of the 1st century A.D. 148 3.2: Torso of an emperor in armor, second half of the 1st century A.D. Detail. 149 3.3: Anonymous victoriatus with torque. Rome, c. 211–208 B.C. RRC 91/1a. 159 3.4: Denarius of L. Manlius Torquatus (q.). Rome, 113/112 B.C. RRC 295/1. 159 3.5: Denarius of D. Junius L. f. Silanus. Rome, 91 B.C. RRC 337/1a. 161 3.6: Denarius of L. Manlius Torquatus (pr. 49). Rome, 58 B.C. RRC 411/1a. 162 3.7: Anonymous denarius with elephant’s head. Rome, 128 B.C. RRC 262/1. 171 3.8: Denarius of T. Quinctius Flamininus. Rome, 126 B.C. RRC 267/1. 174 3.9: Denarius of M. Caecilius Metellus Q.f. (cos. 115). Rome, 127 B.C. RRC 263/1b. 174 3.10: Denarius of C. Caecilius Metellus (cos. 113). Rome, 125 B.C. RRC 269/1. 176 3.11: Tetradrachm of Philip V. Macedon, c. 188–179 B.C. Mamroth 16. 178 viii 3.12: Denarius of Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius (cos. 109). Uncertain mint in northern Italy, c. 81 B.C. 180 RRC 374/1. 3.13: Tetradrachm of Roman Crete. Gortyn, c. 67 B.C. RPC I 901.2. Svoronos 190. 180 3.14: Denarius of Julius Caesar. Moving mint, 49–48 B.C. RRC 443/1. 184 3.15: Denarius of Q. Caecilius Metellus Pius Scipio. Africa, 47–46 B.C. RRC 459/1. 184 3.16: Denarius of M. Durmius. Rome, 19/18 B.C. RIC I2 Augustus 311. 191 3.17: Stater of Ptolemy I. Cyrene, c. 300–298 B.C. Svoronos 1. 191 3.18: Aureus of Augustus. Spain (Colonia Patricia?), July 18 B.C.–17/16 B.C. RIC I2 Augustus 141. 193 3.19: Statue of “Trajan-Hercules.” Rome, A.D. 108–113. 210 3.20: Statue of “Trajan-Hercules.” Rome, A.D. 108–113. Detail. 210 3.21: Bust of Commodus as Hercules. Rome, A.D. 180–193. 212 3.22: Aureus of Commodus. Rome, A.D. 192. RIC III Commodus 253. 215 3.23: Aureus of Maximian. Rome, A.D. 293–294. Cohen VI2 254 var. 218 4.1: Detail of the Augustus of Prima Porta. Rome, early 1st c. A.D. 223 4.2: Dupondius of Octavian. Italy, c. 38 B.C.
Recommended publications
  • Daily Coin Relief!

    Daily Coin Relief!

    DAILY COIN RELIEF! A BLOG FOR ANCIENT COINS ON THE PAS BY SAM MOORHEAD & ANDREW BROWN Issue 6 by Andrew Brown – 24 March 2020 Trajan and Dacia Often coins recorded through the PAS hint at or provide direct links to the wider Roman world. This can be anything from depictions of the Emperors, through to places, key events, battles, and even architecture. Good examples of this are seen in the coinage of Trajan (AD 98- 117), particularly in relation to his two military campaigns in Dacia – the landscape of modern-day Romania and Moldova, notably around the Carpathian Mountains (Transylvania) – in AD 101-102 and AD 105-106. Dacia, with her king Decebalus, was considered a potential threat to Rome as well as a source of great natural wealth, particularly gold. Trajan’s victorious Dacian Wars resulted in the southern half of Dacia being annexed as the Roman Marcus Ulpius Traianus province of Dacia Traiana in AD 106, rejuvenated the (AD 98-117) Roman economy, and brought Trajan glory. His triumph (PUBLIC-6A513E) instigated 123 days of celebrations with Roman games that involved 10,000 gladiators and even more wild animals! Coins of Trajan are not uncommon.1 The PAS has over 3,200 examples (https://finds.org.uk/database/search/result s/ruler/256/objecttype/COIN/broadperiod/ ROMAN ) for Trajan alone, as well as much rarer examples of coins struck for his wife Plotina (2 examples), sister Marciana (5 examples), and niece Matidia (1 example). 1 The standard reference is RIC II. However, this has been superseded by the work of Bernhard Woytek, the leading expert on Trajanic coinage, in his Die Reichsprägung des Kaisers Traianus (98-117) (MIR 14, Vienna, 2010).
  • Hadrian and the Greek East

    Hadrian and the Greek East

    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
  • Faunal Remains

    Faunal Remains

    This is a repository copy of Faunal remains. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/169068/ Version: Published Version Book Section: Halstead, P. orcid.org/0000-0002-3347-0637 (2020) Faunal remains. In: Wright, J.C. and Dabney, M.K., (eds.) The Mycenaean Settlement on Tsoungiza Hill. Nemea Valley Archaeological Project (III). American School of Classical Studies at Athens , Princeton, New Jersey , pp. 1077-1158. ISBN 9780876619247 Copyright © 2020 American School of Classical Studies at Athens, originally published in The Mycenaean Settlement on Tsoungiza Hill (Nemea Valley Archaeological Project III), by James C. Wright and Mary K. Dabney. This offprint is supplied for personal, noncommercial use only. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Copyright © 2020 American School of Classical Studies at Athens, originally published in The Mycenaean Settlement on Tsoungiza Hill (Nemea Valley Archaeological Project III), by James C.
  • The How Behind the Roman Pax

    The How Behind the Roman Pax

    The How Behind Roman Pax: Selected Roman Operations Aimed at Establishing Peace and their Lessons for Modern Peace Operations Brian E Frydenborg 7/1/2011 Rev. November 2011 July 2011- Independent Study GMU Dr. Bonnie Stabile 1 1 Scene from the film “Agora,” dir. Alejandro Amenábar, 2009. Readers are simultaneously entertained and educated by an account of causes and by seeing people choose the better course in any given situation -Polybius, The Histories 6.2 Lucullus now turned his attention to the cities in Asia in order that, while he was at leisure from military enterprises, he might do something for the furtherance of justice and law. -Plutarch, Parallel Lives, The Life of Lucullus 20 Let us see if by moderation we can win all hearts and secure a lasting victory, since by cruelty others have been unable to escape from hatred and to maintain their victory for any length of time…This is a new way of conquering, to strengthen one’s position by kindness and generosity. As to how this can be done, some ideas have occurred to me and many more can be found. I should like you to turn some attention to the matter. -Caesar, Caesar to Oppius and Cornelius, Greeting 1 Preface a.) Why I Chose This Topic For much of American history until relatively recently, the educated elites of America, from the colonial era until into the 20th century, were steeped in an education that emphasized the Greco-Roman classics, learning Greek and Latin, and reading the authors of antiquity. Such trends were especially exemplified by the Founding Fathers.

  • A Literary Sources

    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82860-4 — The Hellenistic World from Alexander to the Roman Conquest 2nd Edition Index More Information Index A Literary sources Livy XXVI.24.7–15: 77 (a); XXIX.12.11–16: 80; XXXI.44.2–9: 11 Aeschines III.132–4: 82; XXXIII.38: 195; XXXVII.40–1: Appian, Syrian Wars 52–5, 57–8, 62–3: 203; XXXVIII.34: 87; 57 XXXIX.24.1–4: 89; XLI.20: 209 (b); ‘Aristeas to Philocrates’ I.9–11 and XLII.29–30.7: 92; XLII.51: 94; 261 V.35–40: XLV.29.3–30 and 32.1–7: 96 15 [Aristotle] Oeconomica II.2.33: I Maccabees 1.1–9: 24; 1.10–25 and 5 7 Arrian, Alexander I.17: ; II.14: ; 41–56: 217; 15.1–9: 221 8 9 III.1.5–2.2: (a); III.3–4: ; II Maccabees 3.1–3: 216 12 13 IV.10.5–12.5: ; V.28–29.1: ; Memnon, FGrH 434 F 11 §§5.7–11: 159 14 20 V1.27.3–5: ; VII.1.1–4: ; Menander, The Sicyonian lines 3–15: 104 17 18 VII.4.4–5: ; VII.8–9 and 11: Menecles of Barca FGrHist 270F9:322 26 Arrian, FGrH 156 F 1, §§1–8: (a); F 9, Pausanias I.7: 254; I.9.4: 254; I.9.5–10: 30 §§34–8: 56; I.25.3–6: 28; VII.16.7–17.1: Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae V.201b–f, 100 258 43 202f–203e: ; VI.253b–f: Plutarch, Agis 5–6.1 and 7.5–8: 69 23 Augustine, City of God 4.4: Alexander 10.6–11: 3 (a); 15: 4 (a); Demetrius of Phalerum, FGrH 228 F 39: 26.3–10: 8 (b); 68.3: cf.
  • Brothers Fighting Together in the Iliad

    Brothers Fighting Together in the Iliad

    BROTHERS FIGHTING TOGETHER IN THE ILIAD I We find in the Iliad numerous pairs of brothers (or half­ brothers on the father's side, or first cousins on the father's side) fighting together on foot or in the combination of chario­ teer-paraibates 1). And this is not confined to the men who are said to have taken part in the Trojan war, but it embraces the "mythical world of the past" 2), that of the demigods 3), the rivers 4) and even the gods 5). Moreover, if we turn to the leaders of the various groups of Greeks and Trojans, as given in book 11, we find that a 1). Such for example are: Ajax Telarnonius and Teucer (the Atav'ts, cf. p. 291), Mynes and Epistrophus (II 692f.), Phegeus and Idaeus (V 10f.), Echemon and Chromios (V 159 f.), Krethon and Orsilochus (V 542 f,), Aesepus and Pedasus (VI 21 f.), Hector and Alexander (VI 514 f., cf. VII 1 f.), Ascalaphus and lalmenus (IX 82f., cf. II 512), Peisandrus and Hip­ polochus (XI 122 f.), Hippodamus and Hypeirochus (XI 328 f.), Charops and Socus (XI 426 f.), the Molione (XI 750, 709 f.; XXIII 638 f.), Polybus, Agenor and Akarnas (XI 59 f.), Helenos and Deiphobus (XII 94 f,), Archelochus and Akamas (XIV 463 f.), Hector and Cebriones (XII 86 f.), Deiphobus and Polites (XIII 533 f.), Podarces and Iphiclus (XIII 693 f,), Deiphohus and Helenos (XIII 780 f.), Ascanius and Morys (XIII 792 f.), Atymnius and Maris (XVI 317 f.), Antilochus and Thrasymedes (XVI 322; XVII 377 f.; XVII 705), Euphorbus and Polydamas (XVII 1 f.), Chromius and Aretus (XVII 492 f.), Aretus and Hector (XVII 516), Polydorus and Hector (XX 407 f,), Laogonus and Dardanus (XX 460 f.), or Deiphobus and Hector (XXII 226 f.).
  • The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in Their Social, Economic, and Political Context by Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Directo

    The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in Their Social, Economic, and Political Context by Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Directo

    The Military Reforms of Gaius Marius in their Social, Economic, and Political Context By Michael C. Gambino August, 2015 Director of Thesis: Dr. Frank Romer Major Department: History Abstract The goal of this thesis is, as the title affirms, to understand the military reforms of Gaius Marius in their broader societal context. In this thesis, after a brief introduction (Chap. I), Chap. II analyzes the Roman manipular army, its formation, policies, and armament. Chapter III examines Roman society, politics, and economics during the second century B.C.E., with emphasis on the concentration of power and wealth, the legislative programs of Ti. And C. Gracchus, and the Italian allies’ growing demand for citizenship. Chap. IV discusses Roman military expansion from the Second Punic War down to 100 B.C.E., focusing on Roman military and foreign policy blunders, missteps, and mistakes in Celtiberian Spain, along with Rome’s servile wars and the problem of the Cimbri and Teutones. Chap. V then contextualizes the life of Gaius Marius and his sense of military strategy, while Chap VI assesses Marius’s military reforms in his lifetime and their immediate aftermath in the time of Sulla. There are four appendices on the ancient literary sources (App. I), Marian consequences in the Late Republic (App. II), the significance of the legionary eagle standard as shown during the early principate (App. III), and a listing of the consular Caecilii Metelli in the second and early first centuries B.C.E. (App. IV). The Marian military reforms changed the army from a semi-professional citizen militia into a more professionalized army made up of extensively trained recruits who served for longer consecutive terms and were personally bound to their commanders.
  • Nicholson Museum

    Nicholson Museum

    OF FACES POWER IMPERIAL PORTRAITURE ON ROMAN COINS NICHOLSON MUSEUM Peter Brennan, Michael Turner & Nicholas L. Wright OF FACES POWER IMPERIAL PORTRAITURE ON ROMAN COINS NICHOLSON MUSEUM Peter Brennan, Michael Turner & Nicholas L. Wright This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be made to the publisher. No photograph printed in this book may be reproduced without the permission of the copyright owner. Copyright for the text and images in this publication is held by the Nicholson Museum. Published by the Nicholson Museum, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia © The Nicholson Museum, The University of Sydney, 2007 Faces of Power Imperial Portraiture on Roman Coins ISBN 1 86487 833 9 This book was produced with the generous financial support of the Alexander Cambitoglou Nicholson Museum Endowment Fund. Book design by Virginia Buckingham, Virginia Buckingham Graphic Design. Photographs by Rowan Conroy. COVER & ADJACENT IMAGES: DOMITIAN ROME MINT: 75–79 AD AUREUS OBV: CAESAR AVG F DOMITIANVS; LAUREATE, BEARDED HEAD OF DOMITIAN R.; DOTTED BORDER REV: CERES AVGVST; DRAPED CERES STANDING L. HOLDING EAR OF CORN IN R. HAND, SCEPTRE IN L.; DOTTED BORDER NM 2004.2624 (BMC 322.) CONTENTS FOREWORD 5 Michael Turner FACES OF POWER 7 Peter Brennan A QUICK GUIDE TO ROMAN COINS 9 Nicholas L. Wright Romans – The people with the three names 9 Legends & their abbreviations 10 Greek Imperial coinage 12 Glossary of descriptive terms & abbreviations 12 COIN DENOMINATIONS 14 Primary Imperial Roman denominations 27 BC – 294 AD Primary Imperial Roman denominations after 294 AD Primary civic (Greek Imperial) denominations in Eastern provinces THE COINS 15 Peter Brennan THE DYNASTIES 79 Nicholas L.
  • The Military Institutions of the Romans [ Epitoma Rei Militaris

    The Military Institutions of the Romans [ Epitoma Rei Militaris

    The Military Institutions of the Romans [ Epitoma rei militaris - 390 A.D ] by Flavius Vegetius Renatus [ Translated by Lieutenant John Clarke - 1767 ] Introduction - 1940 Preface to Book I Book I : The Selection and Training of New Levies • The Roman Discipline the Cause of Their Greatness • The Selection of Recruits • The Proper Age for Recruits • Their Size • Signs of Desirable Qualities • The Trades Proper for New Levies • The Military Mark • Initial Training • To Learn to Swim • The Post Exercise • Not to Cut, But to Thrust with the Sword • The Drill Called Armatura • The Use of Missile Weapons • The Use of the Bow • The Sling • The Loaded Javelin • To be Taught to Vault • And To Carry Burdens • The Arms of the Ancients • Entrenched Camps • Evolutions • Monthly Marches • Conclusion Preface to Book II Book II : The Organization of the Legion • The Military Establishment • The Difference between the Legions and Auxiliaries • Causes of Decay of the Legion • The Organization of the Legion</li> • The Officers of the Legion • The Praefect of the Workmen • The Tribune of the Soldiers • Centuries and Ensigns of the Foot • Legionary Troops of Horse • Drawing up a Legion in Order of Battle • Names of Soldiers Inscribed on their Shields • Records and Accounts • Soldier's Deposits • Promotion in the Legion • Legionary Music • The Drilling of the Troops • Machines and Tools of the Legion Preface to Book III Book III : Dispositions for Action • The Number which Should Compose an Army • Means of Preserving it in Health • Care to Provide Forage
  • PYRRHUS Imperator Campaign of Italy and Sicily, 279 BCE to 275 BCE

    PYRRHUS Imperator Campaign of Italy and Sicily, 279 BCE to 275 BCE

    PYRRHUS IMPERATOR CAMPAIGN OF ITALY AND SICILY, 279 BCE TO 275 BCE Pyrrhus Imperator simulates the campaign of It indicates the maximum number of combat units Pyrrhus 1st king of Epirus in Greece from 279 (4 to 10) that may be commanded by this comman- to 275 BCE. One player commands the eastern der. This is a roman numeral for the Romans and camp: Epirotes, Samnites, Etruscans and Greeks; an Arabic numeral for the others. the other player commands the western camp: • Verso : the commander has been activated this Romans and Carthaginians. The Campanians and season. Mamertines are neutral. •Consuls A and B : The rules are inspired by Optimus Princeps (VV 67, The consuls are called A and B to differentiate them 68, 69), Spartacus Imperator (Hexasim) and Caesar in the game help. They have no activated verso.. Imperator: Britannia (VV 112). Note : A Roman commander cannot command a mercenary CU. 0 - MATeRIeL 0.1 - THe GAMe BOARD 0.2.2 - The combat units (CU) The game board represents a point in Africa but es- A combat unit (CU) represents a unit of 500 to pecially in Magna Graecia, which is the southern 2,000 men or 500 to 1,000 cavaliers part of Italy and Sicily. The small islands are deco- or 10 war elephants or 10 siege wea- rative elements. pons. A CU has a melee value of 0 to The zones may be rural zones (plains are green, 3 and a fire value of 0 to 4. mountains are brown), sea zones (blue), or urban The Roman CU have a symbol: or city zones (squares).
  • Roman Woman, Culture, and Law by Heather Faith Wright Senior Seminar

    Roman Woman, Culture, and Law by Heather Faith Wright Senior Seminar

    Roman Woman, Culture, and Law By Heather Faith Wright Senior Seminar: HST 499 Professor John L. Rector Western Oregon University June 5, 2010 Readers Professor Benedict Lowe Professor Laurie Carlson Copyright @ Heather Wright, 2010 2 The topic of my senior thesis is Women of the Baths. Women were an important part of the activities and culture that took place within the baths. Throughout Roman history bathing was important to the Romans. By the age of Augustus visiting the baths had become one of the three main activities in a Roman citizen’s daily life. The baths were built following the current trends in architecture and were very much a part of the culture of their day. The architecture, patrons, and prostitutes of the Roman baths greatly influenced the culture of this institution. The public baths of both the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire were important social environment to hear or read poetry and meet lovers. Patrons were expected to wear special bathing costumes, because under various emperors it was illegal to bathe nude. It was also very important to maintain the baths; they were, at the top of the Roman government's list of social responsibilities. The baths used the current trends in architecture, and were very much a part of the culture of the day. Culture within the Roman baths, mainly the Imperial and Republican baths was essential to Roman society. The baths were complex arenas to discuss politics, have rendezvous with prostitutes and socialize with friends. Aqueducts are an example of the level of specialization which the Romans had reached in the glory days of the Republic.
  • Livy's Early History of Rome: the Horatii & Curiatii

    Livy's Early History of Rome: the Horatii & Curiatii

    Livy’s Early History of Rome: The Horatii & Curiatii (Book 1.24-26) Mary Sarah Schmidt University of Georgia Summer Institute 2016 [1] The Horatii and Curiatii This project is meant to highlight the story of the Horatii and Curiatii in Rome’s early history as told by Livy. It is intended for use with a Latin class that has learned the majority of their Latin grammar and has knowledge of Rome’s history surrounding Julius Caesar, the civil wars, and the rise of Augustus. The Latin text may be used alone or with the English text of preceding chapters in order to introduce and/or review the early history of Rome. This project can be used in many ways. It may be an opportunity to introduce a new Latin author to students or as a supplement to a history unit. The Latin text may be used on its own with an historical introduction provided by the instructor or the students may read and study the events leading up to the battle of the Horatii and Curiatii as told by Livy. Ideally, the students will read the preceding chapters, noting Livy’s intention of highlighting historical figures whose actions merit imitation or avoidance. This will allow students to develop an understanding of what, according to Livy and his contemporaries, constituted a morally good or bad Roman. Upon reaching the story of the Horatii and Curiatii, not only will students gain practice and understanding of Livy’s Latin literary style, but they will also be faced with the morally confusing Horatius.