USGS Scientific Investigations Map 3268

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

USGS Scientific Investigations Map 3268 U.S. Department of the Interior Prepared In Cooperation With The Scientific Investigations Map 3268 U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Navajo Nation Sheet 3 of 3 Pamphlet accompanies map CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS SURFICIAL DEPOSITS QsQaf Qf QdQesQdl Qdp Qdb Qdm Qdlu Qg1 Qa1 Qg2 Qa2 Qps Qae Qg3 Qa3 Holocene Qv Qtr Ql QUATERNARY LIST OF MAP UNITS SEDIMENTARY ROCKS Supai Group (Cisuralian, Pennsylvanian, and Upper Mississippian) Qg4 Pleistocene [Some map units are too small to distinguish unit identification by color. These units are labeled Qa4 Qg5-18 Km Mancos Shale (Upper Cretaceous) Pe Esplanade Sandstone (Cisuralian) Pliocene where possible; all units are attributed in the geodatabase] Tgs TERTIARY Miocene Kd Dakota Sandstone (Upper Cretaceous) ms Wescogame (Upper Pennsylvanian), Manakacha (Middle Pennsylvanian) SURFICIAL DEPOSITS SEDIMENTARY ROCKS and Watahomigi (Lower Pennsylvanian and Upper Mississippian) Forma- Qaf Artificial fill and quarries (Holocene) Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) tions, undivided Km Upper Jms Salt Wash Member Ms Surprise Canyon Formation (Upper Mississippian) CRETACEOUS Qs Stream-channel deposits (Holocene) Kd Cretaceous San Rafael Group (Middle Jurassic) Jr Romana Sandstone Mr Redwall Limestone, undivided (Upper and Lower Mississippian) Unconformity Qf Floodplain deposits (Holocene) Jms Je Entrada Sandstone Upper Jurassic Qes Sand sheet deposits (Holocene) Unconformity Jc Carmel Formation, undivided Qd Dune sand and sand sheet deposits, undivided (Holocene) EXPLANATION OF MAP SYMBOLS Jr Jcu Paria River Member and Winsor Member, undivided Unconformity Qdl Linear dune deposits (Holocene) Contact—Contacts between all alluvial and eolian units are approximate and Je Jcj Judd Hollow Tongue and Page Sandstone Tongues, undivided Qdp Parabolic dune deposits (Holocene) arbitrary San Rafael Middle Jurassic Jp Page Sandstone 35 F Qdb Barchan dune deposits (Holocene) Fault—Dashed where inferred; dotted where concealed; bar and ball on down- Group Jcu Glen Canyon Group (Lower Jurassic) thrown side. Showing fault offset in feet Qdm Jn Navajo Sandstone Unconformity Jc JURASSIC Mixed dune deposits (Holocene) Folds—Showing trace of axial surface and direction of plunge; dotted where Jk Kayenta Formation, undivided Jcj Jp Qdlu Linear dune and sand sheet deposits, undivided (Holocene) location is concealed Anticline Unconformity Qg1 Young terrace-gravel deposits (Holocene) Jks Springdale Sandstone Member F ? Jn Jm F Plunging anticline Qa1 Young alluvial fan deposits (Holocene) Moenave Formation and Wingate Sandstone, undivided Jk Chinle Formation (Upper Triassic) Glen M Syncline Qg2 Intermediate terrace-gravel deposits (Holocene) co Owl Rock Member Canyon Jks Lower Jurassic Group M ? Plunging syncline Unconformity Qa2 Intermediate alluvial fan deposits (Holocene) cp Petrified Forest Member Jm Monocline Qps Ponded sediments (Holocene) cs Shinarump Member Unconformity Moenkopi Formation (Middle(?) and Lower Triassic) Strike and dip of beds Qae o Mixed alluvium and eolian deposits (Holocene) Upper red member (Middle(?) and Lower Triassic) co mu 35 Inclined—Showing dip measured in the field Upper Qg3 o cp Old terrace-gravel deposits (Holocene) Shnabkaib Member (Lower Triassic) Triassic ms Implied—Interpreted from aerial photographs; dip not determined cs Qa3 Old alluvial fan deposits (Holocene) Lower red member, Virgin Limestone Member, and middle red member, TRIASSIC mlm Strike of vertical and subvertical joints—Interpreted from aerial photographs; Unconformity undivided (Lower Triassic) Qv Valley-fill deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene(?)) symbol placed where joints are most visible on aerial photographs Kaibab Formation (Cisuralian) mu Middle(?) and Lower Triassic Qtr Talus and rock-fall deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene(?)) Pkh Harrisburg Member Collapse structure—Black dot shows circular collapse structure characterized by ms strata dipping inward toward a central point. Magenta dot shows circular Lower Triassic Ql Pkf Fossil Mountain Member collapse structure characterized by strata dipping inward toward a central point mlm Landslide deposits (Holocene and Pleistocene) and brecciated rock Toroweap Formation, undivided (Cisuralian) Unconformity Qg4 Older terrace-gravel deposits (Pleistocene) Pt Sinkhole Pkh Qa4 Older alluvial fan deposits (Pleistocene and Pliocene(?)) Pc Coconino Sandstone (Cisuralian) Mine or prospect Pkf Qg5-18 Oldest terrace-gravel deposits, undivided (Pleistocene and Pliocene(?)) Ph Hermit Formation (Cisuralian) Unconformity Fracture—Open fracture (0.5 to 3.5 m wide) without offset Tgs Gravel and sedimentary deposits (Pliocene(?) or Miocene(?)) Pt Offset fracture—Open fracture (0.5 to 3.5 m wide) with offset (generally less than 1.5 m Unconformity Cisuralian PERMIAN Pc Unconformity Ph Unconformity 111°37'30'' Pe Supai Unconformity Group Upper, Middle and Lower Pennsylvanian A B Ms PENNSYLVANIAN and Upper Mississippian Unconformity Qg6 Qg5 111°30' MISSISSIPPIAN Qg5 Ms Upper Mississippian Qg5 Qg14 37°00' 36°52'30'' Qg12 Upper and Lower Qg6 Qg13 Qg12 Qg12 Mr Qg10 Qg9 Qg11 Mississippian Qg8 Qg6 Qg16 Qg10 Qg10 Qg9 Qg5 Qg14 Qg13 Qg16 Qg9 Qg12 Qg11 Qg10 Qg10 Qg10 Qg13 Qg12 Qg10 Qg5 Qg14 Qg14 Qg6 Qg11 Qg5 Qg13 Qg11 111°00' Qg5 Qg14 112°00' Qg6 Qg14 Qg10 37°00' Cummings Qg5 Qg15 Cedar Qg7 GLEN CANYON Mesa Qg5 Qg5 Mountain 89 Qg15 NRA Qg11 Qg7 Qg6 Qg10 RAINBOW PLATEAU Qg7 Table 1. Age and elevation of floodplain and terrace-gravel deposits along the Colorado Qg6 Qg12 Qg7 Qg7 Qg7 River from Glen Canyon Dam to Badger Rapids, a 25 mile (40 km) section of the river. Qg13 Qg10 Qg12 Ferry Swale Glen Qg7 Qg15 Qg12 Qg18 Paria River Canyon Refer to locations of separate older terrace-gravel deposits in figure 2. Qg17 Dam Page Qg8 Qg7 Qg16 Qg11 Qg7 Qg7 Elevation above Map unit Age Qg6 PARIA PLATEAU Colorado River Qg6 Qg9 Qg11 Lees Ferry Floodplain deposits Qg9 Qg9 VERMILION CLIFFS STRIP LeChee 2B LeChee Rock Navajo Creek Marble Qf Holocene 0–45 ft (0–14 m) Qg9 NATIONAL MONUMENT Canyon Young and intermediate terrace-gravel deposits Qg9 COW SPRINGS Qg9 Qg18 Vermilion Qg1 Holocene 7–17 ft (2–5 m) Qg9 Cliffs Lodge SYNCLINE Tse Esgizii Butte Qg2 Holocene 27–47 ft (8–14 m) Qg9a Qg18 Qg10 Cliffs Qg3 Holocene 47–77 ft (14–23 m) Echo Qg9a Qg10 Qg9a Qg4 Holocene and Pleistocene(?) 87–127 ft (27–39 m) Qg10 Cliff Qg9a Vermilion Dwellers Lodge Older terrace-gravel deposits Qg9a Kaibito Qg5 PARIA PLATEAU SYNCLINE 2A Holocene and Pleistocene(?) 107–127 ft (33–39 m) Qg9a KAIBITO Qg11 Qg6 Holocene(?) and Pleistocene 147–207 ft (45–63 m) Qg9a 98 Qg9a 89A Qg7 Pleistocene 275–300 ft (84–91 m) NAVAJO INDIAN Creek Qg8 Pleistocene 290–390 ft (88–119 m) RIDGE RED LAKE ANTICLINE RESERVATION MONOCLINE House Rock Valley LIMESTONE Qg9 Pleistocene 495–555 ft (151–169 m) PLATEAU SYNCLINEKAIBITO Qg9a Pleistocene 620–635 ft (189–194 m) Bitter Springs Copper Mine Qg10 Pleistocene 600–620 ft (183–189 m) Qg13 LAST TUBA CITY Qg11 Pleistocene 620–630 ft (189–192 m) CHANCE SYNCLINE Cliffs Kaibito Qg15 ARIZONA ANTICLINE Qg12 Pleistocene 760–800 ft (232–244 m) Qg13 Pleistocene 800–860 ft (244–262 m) Qg15 PRESTON MESA White Qg14 Pleistocene 900–920 ft (274–280 m) Qg15 GRAND CANYON ANTICLINE Colorado River Mesa 36°52'30'' NATIONAL PARK MARBLE PLATEAU F Qg15 Pleistocene 960–980 ft (293–299 m) 36°45' 89 ECHO CLIFFS Qg16 Pleistocene and Pliocene(?) 990–1,000 ft (302–305 m) MONOCLINE F Qg17 Pleistocene and Pliocene(?) 1,060–1,085 ft (323–331 m) FENCE EMINENCE FAULTF BREAK FAULT Qg18 Pleistocene and Pliocene(?) 1,140–1,190 ft (347–363 m) 36°30' Figure 1. Map of the Glen Canyon Dam 30’ x 60’ quadrangle showing cultural and physiographic features as well as major geologic structures. Boxes define area of maps in figure 2. Figure 2. Maps showing detail of terrace gravels (units Qg5-Qg18) along the Colorado River. A. Gravels from Lees Ferry south to River Mile 9 below Badger Rapid. Colorado River elevation at Lee’s Ferry is 3,133 ft (955 m). B. Gravels from northeast of Lees Ferry north to lower Lake Powell. Colorado River elevation at base of Glen Canyon Dam is 3,146 ft (959 m). River gradient between Glen Canyon Dam and River Mile 9 is 3.5 ft/mi. See table 1 for additional unit information. See figure 1 for map locations. Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Geologic Map of the Glen Canyon 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, Coconino County, Northern Arizona This map was printed on an electronic plotter directly from digital files. Dimensional calibration may vary between electronic plotters and between X and Y directions on the same plotter, and paper may change size due to atmospheric conditions; therefore, scale and proportions may not be true on plots of this map. For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services, Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, By 1–888–ASK–USGS Digital files available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3268/ George H. Billingsley and Susan S. Priest Suggested Citation: Billingsley, G.H. and Priest, S.S., 201x, Geologic map of the Glen Canyon Dam 30’ x 60’ quadrangle, Coconino County, northern Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations 2013 Map 3268, pamphlet 43 p., 3 sheets, scale 1:50,000 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3268/)..
Recommended publications
  • New Permian Fauna from Tropical Gondwana
    ARTICLE Received 18 Jun 2015 | Accepted 18 Sep 2015 | Published 5 Nov 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9676 OPEN New Permian fauna from tropical Gondwana Juan C. Cisneros1,2, Claudia Marsicano3, Kenneth D. Angielczyk4, Roger M. H. Smith5,6, Martha Richter7, Jo¨rg Fro¨bisch8,9, Christian F. Kammerer8 & Rudyard W. Sadleir4,10 Terrestrial vertebrates are first known to colonize high-latitude regions during the middle Permian (Guadalupian) about 270 million years ago, following the Pennsylvanian Gondwanan continental glaciation. However, despite over 150 years of study in these areas, the bio- geographic origins of these rich communities of land-dwelling vertebrates remain obscure. Here we report on a new early Permian continental tetrapod fauna from South America in tropical Western Gondwana that sheds new light on patterns of tetrapod distribution. Northeastern Brazil hosted an extensive lacustrine system inhabited by a unique community of temnospondyl amphibians and reptiles that considerably expand the known temporal and geographic ranges of key subgroups. Our findings demonstrate that tetrapod groups common in later Permian and Triassic temperate communities were already present in tropical Gondwana by the early Permian (Cisuralian). This new fauna constitutes a new biogeographic province with North American affinities and clearly demonstrates that tetrapod dispersal into Gondwana was already underway at the beginning of the Permian. 1 Centro de Cieˆncias da Natureza, Universidade Federal do Piauı´, 64049-550 Teresina, Brazil. 2 Programa de Po´s-Graduac¸a˜o em Geocieˆncias, Departamento de Geologia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50740-533 Recife, Brazil. 3 Departamento de Cs. Geologicas, FCEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, IDEAN- CONICET, C1428EHA Ciudad Auto´noma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3.Pdf
    A Geoconservation perspective on the trace fossil record associated with the end – Ordovician mass extinction and glaciation in the Welsh Basin Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Nicholls, Keith H. Citation Nicholls, K. (2019). A Geoconservation perspective on the trace fossil record associated with the end – Ordovician mass extinction and glaciation in the Welsh Basin. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 26/09/2021 02:37:15 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622234 International Chronostratigraphic Chart v2013/01 Erathem / Era System / Period Quaternary Neogene C e n o z o i c Paleogene Cretaceous M e s o z o i c Jurassic M e s o z o i c Jurassic Triassic Permian Carboniferous P a l Devonian e o z o i c P a l Devonian e o z o i c Silurian Ordovician s a n u a F y r Cambrian a n o i t u l o v E s ' i k s w o Ichnogeneric Diversity k p e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 n 23 r e 25 d 27 o 29 M 31 33 35 37 39 T 41 43 i 45 47 m 49 e 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 Number of Ichnogenera (Treatise Part W) Ichnogeneric Diversity 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 n 23 r e 25 d 27 o 29 M 31 33 35 37 39 T 41 43 i 45 47 m 49 e 51 53 55 57 59 61 c i o 63 z 65 o e 67 a l 69 a 71 P 73 75 77 79 81 83 n 85 a i r 87 b 89 m 91 a 93 C Number of Ichnogenera (Treatise Part W)
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon and Strontium Isotope Stratigraphy of the Permian from Nevada and China: Implications from an Icehouse to Greenhouse Transition
    Carbon and strontium isotope stratigraphy of the Permian from Nevada and China: Implications from an icehouse to greenhouse transition Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kate E. Tierney, M.S. Graduate Program in the School of Earth Sciences The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Matthew R. Saltzman, Advisor William I. Ausich Loren Babcock Stig M. Bergström Ola Ahlqvist Copyright by Kate Elizabeth Tierney 2010 Abstract The Permian is one of the most important intervals of earth history to help us understand the way our climate system works. It is an analog to modern climate because during this interval climate transitioned from an icehouse state (when glaciers existed extending to middle latitudes), to a greenhouse state (when there were no glaciers). This climatic amelioration occurred under conditions very similar to those that exist in modern times, including atmospheric CO2 levels and the presence of plants thriving in the terrestrial system. This analog to the modern system allows us to investigate the mechanisms that cause global warming. Scientist have learned that the distribution of carbon between the oceans, atmosphere and lithosphere plays a large role in determining climate and changes in this distribution can be studied by chemical proxies preserved in the rock record. There are two main ways to change the distribution of carbon between these reservoirs. Organic carbon can be buried or silicate minerals in the terrestrial realm can be weathered. These two mechanisms account for the long term changes in carbon concentrations in the atmosphere, particularly important to climate.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian
    [Show full text]
  • Paleogeographic Maps Earth History
    History of the Earth Age AGE Eon Era Period Period Epoch Stage Paleogeographic Maps Earth History (Ma) Era (Ma) Holocene Neogene Quaternary* Pleistocene Calabrian/Gelasian Piacenzian 2.6 Cenozoic Pliocene Zanclean Paleogene Messinian 5.3 L Tortonian 100 Cretaceous Serravallian Miocene M Langhian E Burdigalian Jurassic Neogene Aquitanian 200 23 L Chattian Triassic Oligocene E Rupelian Permian 34 Early Neogene 300 L Priabonian Bartonian Carboniferous Cenozoic M Eocene Lutetian 400 Phanerozoic Devonian E Ypresian Silurian Paleogene L Thanetian 56 PaleozoicOrdovician Mesozoic Paleocene M Selandian 500 E Danian Cambrian 66 Maastrichtian Ediacaran 600 Campanian Late Santonian 700 Coniacian Turonian Cenomanian Late Cretaceous 100 800 Cryogenian Albian 900 Neoproterozoic Tonian Cretaceous Aptian Early 1000 Barremian Hauterivian Valanginian 1100 Stenian Berriasian 146 Tithonian Early Cretaceous 1200 Late Kimmeridgian Oxfordian 161 Callovian Mesozoic 1300 Ectasian Bathonian Middle Bajocian Aalenian 176 1400 Toarcian Jurassic Mesoproterozoic Early Pliensbachian 1500 Sinemurian Hettangian Calymmian 200 Rhaetian 1600 Proterozoic Norian Late 1700 Statherian Carnian 228 1800 Ladinian Late Triassic Triassic Middle Anisian 1900 245 Olenekian Orosirian Early Induan Changhsingian 251 2000 Lopingian Wuchiapingian 260 Capitanian Guadalupian Wordian/Roadian 2100 271 Kungurian Paleoproterozoic Rhyacian Artinskian 2200 Permian Cisuralian Sakmarian Middle Permian 2300 Asselian 299 Late Gzhelian Kasimovian 2400 Siderian Middle Moscovian Penn- sylvanian Early Bashkirian
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical List
    LIST E - GEOLOGIC AGE (STRATIGRAPHIC) TERMS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Age Unit Broader Term Age Unit Broader Term Aalenian Middle Jurassic Brunhes Chron upper Quaternary Acadian Cambrian Bull Lake Glaciation upper Quaternary Acheulian Paleolithic Bunter Lower Triassic Adelaidean Proterozoic Burdigalian lower Miocene Aeronian Llandovery Calabrian lower Pleistocene Aftonian lower Pleistocene Callovian Middle Jurassic Akchagylian upper Pliocene Calymmian Mesoproterozoic Albian Lower Cretaceous Cambrian Paleozoic Aldanian Lower Cambrian Campanian Upper Cretaceous Alexandrian Lower Silurian Capitanian Guadalupian Algonkian Proterozoic Caradocian Upper Ordovician Allerod upper Weichselian Carboniferous Paleozoic Altonian lower Miocene Carixian Lower Jurassic Ancylus Lake lower Holocene Carnian Upper Triassic Anglian Quaternary Carpentarian Paleoproterozoic Anisian Middle Triassic Castlecliffian Pleistocene Aphebian Paleoproterozoic Cayugan Upper Silurian Aptian Lower Cretaceous Cenomanian Upper Cretaceous Aquitanian lower Miocene *Cenozoic Aragonian Miocene Central Polish Glaciation Pleistocene Archean Precambrian Chadronian upper Eocene Arenigian Lower Ordovician Chalcolithic Cenozoic Argovian Upper Jurassic Champlainian Middle Ordovician Arikareean Tertiary Changhsingian Lopingian Ariyalur Stage Upper Cretaceous Chattian upper Oligocene Artinskian Cisuralian Chazyan Middle Ordovician Asbian Lower Carboniferous Chesterian Upper Mississippian Ashgillian Upper Ordovician Cimmerian Pliocene Asselian Cisuralian Cincinnatian Upper Ordovician Astian upper
    [Show full text]
  • GSSP) for Base of the Permian System
    11 by Vladimir I. Davydov1, Brian F. Glenister2, Claude Spinosa3, Scott M. Ritter4, V. V. Chernykh5, B. R. Wardlaw6, and W. S. Snyder3 Proposal of Aidaralash as Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for base of the Permian System 1. All Russian Geological Research Institiute (VSEGEI), St. Petersburg, Russia 2. University of Iowa 3. Permian Research Institute, Boise State University, Idaho 82735 4. Brigham Young University 5. Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Sverdlovsk, Russia 6. U.S. Geological Survey The base of the Permian System was originally defined of local letter-designated stages for the Permian are still being uti- (Murchison, 1841) in the Ural Mountains of Russia to lized (e.g. Archbold et al., 1993) despite the fact that the Urals inter- coincide with strata marking the initiation of evaporite national standard has served effectively as a Western Australian ref- deposition, now recognized as the Kungurian Stage. erence for over one-half century (e.g. Miller, 1932). Similarly, in Since that time, the base has been lowered repeatedly to China the base of the Permian became stabilized at the unconformity c c c cydcPdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddTfc yPdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddIfc cddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddc
    [Show full text]
  • Revealing the Hidden Milankovitch Record from Pennsylvanian Cyclothem Successions and Implications Regarding Late Paleozoic GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Revealing the hidden Milankovitch record from Pennsylvanian cyclothem successions and implications regarding late Paleozoic GEOSPHERE; v. 11, no. 4 chronology and terrestrial-carbon (coal) storage doi:10.1130/GES01177.1 Frank J.G. van den Belt1, Thomas B. van Hoof2, and Henk J.M. Pagnier3 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Utrecht, P.O. Box 80021, 3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands 9 figures 2TNO Geo-Energy Division, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands 3TNO/Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80015, 3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] CITATION: van den Belt, F.J.G., van Hoof, T.B., ABSTRACT An analysis of cumulative coal-bed thickness further indicates that terres- and Pagnier, H.J.M., 2015, Revealing the hidden Milankovitch record from Pennsylvanian cyclothem trial-carbon (coal) storage patterns are comparable in the two remote areas: successions and implications regarding late Paleo- The widely held view that Pennsylvanian cyclothems formed in response in the Netherlands ~5 m coal per m.y. during the Langsettian (Westphalian zoic chronology and terrestrial-carbon (coal) stor- to Milankovitch-controlled, glacio-eustatic, sea-level oscillations lacks unam- A) and increasing abruptly to ~20 m/m.y. at the start of the Duckmantian age: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 4, p. 1062–1076, doi:10 .1130 /GES01177.1. biguous quantitative support and is challenged by models that are based on substage (Westphalian B). In Kentucky, storage rates were lower, but when climate-controlled precipitation-driven changes in depositional style. This standardized to Dutch subsidence, the pattern is identical.
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Corals of the Cordilleran-Arctic-Uralian Realm
    Acta Geologica Polonica, Vol. 49 (1999), No.2, pp. 159-173 406 /U S UNES 0 I Permian corals of the Cordilleran-Arctic-Uralian Realm JERZY FEDOROWSKIl, E. WAYNE BAMBER2 & CALVIN H. STEVENS3 1 Institute of Geology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Makow Polnych 16, PL-61-606 Poznan, Poland E-mail: [email protected] rd 2 Geological Survey of Canada (Calgary), 3303-33 Street N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2L 2A7, Canada E-mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Geology, San Jose University, San Jose, California 95192, USA E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: FEDOROWSKI, J., BAMBER, E.W. & STEVENS, C.H. Permian corals of the Cordilleran-Arctic-Uralian Realm. Acta Geologica Polonica, 49 (2),159-173. Warszawa. Permian rugose corals of the Cordilleran-Arctic-Uralian Realm are abundant in shallow-water carbon­ ates along the northwestern and western margin of Pangaea, from the Ural Mountains area in Russia, through the Svalbard Archipelago and arctic and western North America, to Bolivia and Peru. The colo­ nial forms are of particular interest for the biostratigraphy and reconstruction of the paleogeography of this extensive region. A revision of the systematics of these corals has shown that, although important differences exist between the assemblages in the areas listcd, the faunas are recognizable throughout the entire realm. Almost all of the faunas in the realm, on cratonal Pangaea, are Cisuralian (Asselian to Artinskian) in age although younger faunas occur in rocks of terranes subsequently accreted to North America. The cratonal faunas show a general trend from a predominance of relatively simple, fasciculate species with open axial areas or weakly developed axial structures in the lowest Permian, to younger, more complex fasciculate and massive species with a variety of morphological elements in their axial structures and dissepimentaria.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Reptile from the Lower Permian of Brazil (Karutia Fortunata Gen
    Journal of Systematic Palaeontology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjsp20 A new reptile from the lower Permian of Brazil (Karutia fortunata gen. et sp. nov.) and the interrelationships of Parareptilia Juan Carlos Cisneros , Christian F. Kammerer , Kenneth D. Angielczyk , Jörg Fröbisch , Claudia Marsicano , Roger M. H. Smith & Martha Richter To cite this article: Juan Carlos Cisneros , Christian F. Kammerer , Kenneth D. Angielczyk , Jörg Fröbisch , Claudia Marsicano , Roger M. H. Smith & Martha Richter (2021): A new reptile from the lower Permian of Brazil (Karutiafortunata gen. et sp. nov.) and the interrelationships of Parareptilia, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2020.1863487 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2020.1863487 View supplementary material Published online: 12 Jan 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 107 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjsp20 Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2020.1863487 A new reptile from the lower Permian of Brazil (Karutia fortunata gen. et sp. nov.) and the interrelationships of Parareptilia aà b c b,d Juan Carlos Cisneros , Christian F. Kammerer , Kenneth D. Angielczyk ,Jorg€ Frobisch€ , Claudia Marsicanoe,f , Roger M. H. Smithg,h and Martha Richteri aMuseu de Arqueologia e Paleontologia, Universidade Federal do Piauı, 64049-550 Teresina, Brazil; bPaleontology Unit, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, NC 27601, USA; cNegaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA; dInstitut fur€ Biologie, Humboldt-Universitat€ zu Berlin, Invalidenstr.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Isotopic Evidence for Rapid Methane Clathrate Release Recorded in Coals at the Terminus of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age Nikola Van De Wetering 1*, Joan S
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Carbon isotopic evidence for rapid methane clathrate release recorded in coals at the terminus of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age Nikola Van de Wetering 1*, Joan S. Esterle1, Suzanne D. Golding 2, Sandra Rodrigues1 & Annette E. Götz3 The end of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age (LPIA) ushered in a period of signifcant change in Earth’s carbon cycle, demonstrated by the widespread occurrence of coals worldwide. In this study, we present 13 stratigraphically constrained organic stable carbon isotope (δ Corg) data for Early Permian coals (312 vitrain samples) from the Moatize Basin, Mozambique, which record the transition from global icehouse to greenhouse conditions. These coals exhibit a three-stage evolution in atmospheric δ13C from the Artinskian to the Kungurian. Early Kungurian coals efectively record the presence of the short-lived Kungurian Carbon Isotopic Excursion (KCIE), associated with the proposed rapid release of methane clathrates during deglaciation at the terminus of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age (LPIA), with no observed 13 disruption to peat-forming and terrestrial plant communities. δ Corg variations in coals from the 3 5 13 Moatize Basin are cyclic in nature on the order of 10 –10 years and refect changes in δ Corg of ~±1‰ during periods of stable peat accumulation, supporting observations from Palaeozoic coals elsewhere. These cyclic variations express palaeoenvironmental factors constraining peat growth and deposition, associated with changes in base level. This study also demonstrates the efectiveness of vitrain in coal as a geochemical tool for recording global atmospheric change during the Late Palaeozoic. Te end of the Late Palaeozoic Ice Age (LPIA) represents one of the most extreme climate transformations in geological history, transitioning from icehouse to greenhouse conditions1–3.
    [Show full text]
  • International Chronostratigraphic Chart
    INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2018/07 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age GSSP GSSP GSSP GSSP EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon Erathem / Era System / Period GSSA age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 541.0 ±1.0 U/L Meghalayan 0.0042 Holocene M Northgrippian 0.0082 Tithonian Ediacaran L/E Greenlandian 152.1 ±0.9 ~ 635 Upper 0.0117 Famennian Neo- 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian Callovian 1000 Quaternary Gelasian 166.1 ±1.2 2.58 Bathonian 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Middle 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Bajocian 170.3 ±1.4 Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Devonian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Proterozoic Neogene Sinemurian Langhian 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- 2050 Burdigalian Hettangian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 27.82 Gorstian
    [Show full text]