Alphabetical List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alphabetical List LIST E - GEOLOGIC AGE (STRATIGRAPHIC) TERMS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Age Unit Broader Term Age Unit Broader Term Aalenian Middle Jurassic Brunhes Chron upper Quaternary Acadian Cambrian Bull Lake Glaciation upper Quaternary Acheulian Paleolithic Bunter Lower Triassic Adelaidean Proterozoic Burdigalian lower Miocene Aeronian Llandovery Calabrian lower Pleistocene Aftonian lower Pleistocene Callovian Middle Jurassic Akchagylian upper Pliocene Calymmian Mesoproterozoic Albian Lower Cretaceous Cambrian Paleozoic Aldanian Lower Cambrian Campanian Upper Cretaceous Alexandrian Lower Silurian Capitanian Guadalupian Algonkian Proterozoic Caradocian Upper Ordovician Allerod upper Weichselian Carboniferous Paleozoic Altonian lower Miocene Carixian Lower Jurassic Ancylus Lake lower Holocene Carnian Upper Triassic Anglian Quaternary Carpentarian Paleoproterozoic Anisian Middle Triassic Castlecliffian Pleistocene Aphebian Paleoproterozoic Cayugan Upper Silurian Aptian Lower Cretaceous Cenomanian Upper Cretaceous Aquitanian lower Miocene *Cenozoic Aragonian Miocene Central Polish Glaciation Pleistocene Archean Precambrian Chadronian upper Eocene Arenigian Lower Ordovician Chalcolithic Cenozoic Argovian Upper Jurassic Champlainian Middle Ordovician Arikareean Tertiary Changhsingian Lopingian Ariyalur Stage Upper Cretaceous Chattian upper Oligocene Artinskian Cisuralian Chazyan Middle Ordovician Asbian Lower Carboniferous Chesterian Upper Mississippian Ashgillian Upper Ordovician Cimmerian Pliocene Asselian Cisuralian Cincinnatian Upper Ordovician Astian upper Pliocene Cisuralian Lower Permian Atdabanian Lower Cambrian Clarendonian Miocene Atlantic Holocene Clarkforkian upper Paleocene Atokan Middle Pennsylvanian Clovis Quaternary Aurignacian Paleolithic *Coal Measures Autunian Lower Permian Comanchean Cretaceous Auversian upper Eocene Coniacian Upper Cretaceous Avonian Carboniferous Cordevolian Triassic Awamoan lower Miocene Couvinian Middle Devonian Badenian middle Miocene Cretaceous Mesozoic Bajocian Middle Jurassic Cromerian upper Pleistocene Bala Ordovician Cryogenian Neoproterozoic Barakar Stage Lower Permian Cuisian lower Eocene Barrandian Middle Cambrian Culm Carboniferous Barremian Lower Cretaceous Dacian Pliocene Barstovian Miocene *Dalradian Bartonian middle Eocene Danian lower Paleocene Bashkirian Lower Pennsylvanian Danube Stade lower Pleistocene Bathonian Middle Jurassic Dapingian Middle Ordovician Berriasian Lower Cretaceous Darriwilian Middle Ordovician Biarritzian Eocene Deseadan middle Tertiary Birimian Paleoproterozoic Desmoinesian Middle Pennsylvanian Blackriverian Middle Ordovician Devensian upper Pleistocene Blancan Cenozoic Devonian Paleozoic Bolling upper Weichselian Dinantian Lower Carboniferous Boreal Holocene Dittonian Lower Devonian Brandenburg Stade Weichselian Dogger Middle Jurassic Brandon Stade Weichselian Domerian Lower Jurassic Bridgerian Eocene Downtonian Paleozoic Brioverian Neoproterozoic Dresbachian Upper Cambrian Bronze Age Cenozoic Ectasian Mesoproterozoic Edenian Upper Ordovician *Does not autopost. 2 LIST E - GEOLOGIC AGE (STRATIGRAPHIC) TERMS - ALPHABETICAL LIST Age Unit Broader Term Age Unit Broader Term Ediacaran Neoproterozoic Karpatian lower Miocene Eemian upper Pleistocene Kasimovian Upper Pennsylvanian Egerian upper Oligocene Katian Upper Ordovician Eggenburgian lower Miocene Kazanian Upper Permian Eifelian Middle Devonian Kellwasser event Upper Devonian Elsterian middle Pleistocene Keuper Upper Triassic Emsian Lower Devonian Keweenawan Proterozoic Eoarchean Archean Kiaman Superchron upper Paleozoic Eocambrian Precambrian Kimmeridgian Upper Jurassic Eocene Paleogene Kinderhookian Lower Mississippian Famennian Upper Devonian Kungurian Permian Flandrian Holocene Ladinian Middle Triassic Floian Lower Ordovician Landenian upper Paleocene Fortunian Terreneuvian Langhian middle Miocene Francevillian Paleoproterozoic Lattorfian upper Eocene Frankfurt Stade Weichselian Laxfordian Mesoproterozoic Fraser Glaciation upper Wisconsinan Leonardian Lower Permian Frasnian Upper Devonian Levalloisian Paleolithic Furongian Upper Cambrian Levantinian upper Pliocene Gargasian Lower Cretaceous Lewisian Proterozoic Gauss Chron Pliocene Litorina Sea lower Holocene Gedinnian Lower Devonian Llandeilian Middle Ordovician Gelasian lower Pleistocene Llandovery Lower Silurian Gilbert Chron lower Pliocene Llanvirnian Middle Ordovician Givetian Middle Devonian Loch Lomond Stade Weichselian Gorstian Ludlow Lochkovian Lower Devonian Griesbachian Lower Triassic Lopingian Upper Permian Guadalupian Permian Lotharingian Lower Jurassic Gulfian Upper Cretaceous lower Albian Albian Gunz Pleistocene lower Aptian Aptian Gzhelian Upper Pennsylvanian lower Badenian Badenian Hadean Precambrian Lower Cambrian Cambrian Hadrynian Neoproterozoic lower Campanian Campanian Harlech Stage Lower Cambrian Lower Carboniferous Carboniferous Haumurian Upper Cretaceous lower Cenomanian Cenomanian Hauterivian Lower Cretaceous lower Cenozoic Cenozoic Helderbergian Lower Devonian lower Coniacian Coniacian Helikian Mesoproterozoic Lower Cretaceous Cretaceous Helvetian middle Miocene Lower Devonian Devonian Hemingfordian lower Miocene lower Eocene Eocene Hemphillian Neogene lower Famennian Famennian Hettangian Lower Jurassic lower Frasnian Frasnian Hirnantian Upper Ordovician lower Holocene Holocene Holocene Quaternary Lower Jurassic Jurassic Holsteinian upper Pleistocene lower Kimmeridgian Kimmeridgian Homerian Wenlock lower Liassic Lower Jurassic Hoxnian upper Pleistocene lower Maestrichtian Maestrichtian Huronian Proterozoic lower Mesozoic Mesozoic Ibexian Lower Ordovician lower Miocene Miocene Ilerdian Paleogene Lower Mississippian Mississippian Illinoian upper Pleistocene lower Muschelkalk Muschelkalk Induan Lower Triassic lower Oligocene Oligocene Infracambrian Neoproterozoic Lower Ordovician Ordovician Ipswichian upper Pleistocene lower Oxfordian Oxfordian Iron Age Cenozoic lower Paleocene Paleocene Irvingtonian Pleistocene lower Paleogene Paleogene Jacksonian Eocene lower Paleolithic Paleolithic Jaramillo Subchron lower Pleistocene lower Paleozoic Paleozoic Jiangshanian Furongian Lower Pennsylvanian Pennsylvanian Jotnian Neoproterozoic Lower Permian Permian Jurassic Mesozoic lower Pleistocene Pleistocene K-T boundary lower Paleocene and Upper lower Pliocene Pliocene Cretaceous lower Quaternary Quaternary Kansan lower Pleistocene Lower Silurian Silurian Karelian Paleoproterozoic lower Tertiary Tertiary Karharbari Stage Upper Carboniferous lower Toarcian Toarcian *Does not autopost. LIST E - GEOLOGIC AGE (STRATIGRAPHIC) TERMS - ALPHABETICAL LIST 3 Age Unit Broader Term Age Unit Broader Term Lower Triassic Triassic Mousterian middle Paleolithic lower Turonian Turonian Muschelkalk Middle Triassic lower Wisconsinan Wisconsinan Namurian Carboniferous Ludfordian Ludlow Narizian Eocene Ludian upper Eocene Nebraskan lower Pleistocene Ludlow Upper Silurian Neoarchean Archean Luisian middle Miocene Neocomian Lower Cretaceous Lusitanian Upper Jurassic Neogene Tertiary Lutetian middle Eocene Neoglacial Holocene Maestrichtian Upper Cretaceous Neohelikian Helikian Magdalenian Paleolithic Neolithic Stone Age and Holocene Malm Upper Jurassic Neoproterozoic Proterozoic Marinoan Neoproterozoic Niagaran Silurian Matuyama Chron upper Cenozoic Norian Upper Triassic Maysvillian Cincinnatian Nukumaruan Cenozoic Medieval Warm Period Holocene Older Dryas upper Weichselian Meotian upper Miocene Oldest Dryas Weichselian Meramecian Upper Mississippian Olduvai Subchron lower Pleistocene Mesoarchean Archean Olenekian Lower Triassic Mesolithic Stone Age and Holocene Oligocene Paleogene Mesoproterozoic Proterozoic Ordovician Paleozoic *Mesozoic Osagian Lower Mississippian Messinian upper Miocene Ottnangian lower Miocene Middle Ages Holocene Oxfordian Upper Jurassic Middle Cambrian Cambrian Paibian Furongian Middle Carboniferous Carboniferous Paleoarchean Archean middle Cenozoic Cenozoic Paleocene Paleogene Middle Cretaceous Cretaceous Paleocene-Eocene Therm- Paleogene Middle Devonian Devonian al Maximum middle Eocene Eocene Paleogene Tertiary middle Holocene Holocene Paleolithic Stone Age Middle Jurassic Jurassic Paleoproterozoic Proterozoic middle Liassic Lower Jurassic *Paleozoic middle Mesozoic Mesozoic Pannonian upper Miocene middle Miocene Miocene Pennsylvanian Carboniferous Middle Mississippian Mississippian Permian Paleozoic middle Oligocene Oligocene Permian-Triassic Upper Permian and Lower Middle Ordovician Ordovician boundary Triassic middle Oxfordian Oxfordian Perth Stade Weichselian middle Paleocene Paleocene *Phanerozoic middle Paleolithic Paleolithic Piacenzian upper Pliocene middle Paleozoic Paleozoic Pinedale Glaciation upper Quaternary Middle Pennsylvanian Pennsylvanian Plaisancian lower Pliocene Middle Permian Permian Pleistocene Quaternary middle Pleistocene Pleistocene Pliensbachian Lower Jurassic middle Pliocene Pliocene Pliocene Neogene middle Precambrian Precambrian Pontian upper Miocene middle Quaternary Quaternary Portlandian Upper Jurassic Middle Silurian Silurian Pragian Lower Devonian middle Tertiary Tertiary Preboreal Holocene Middle Triassic Triassic *Precambrian middle Turonian Turonian Priabonian upper Eocene middle Wisconsinan Wisconsinan Pridoli Upper Silurian Mindel Pleistocene Proterozoic upper Precambrian Mindel/Riss Interglacial Pleistocene Puercan lower Paleocene Miocene Neogene Purbeckian Lower Cretaceous *MIS 11 Quaternary Cenozoic Mississippian Carboniferous Rancholabrean upper Pleistocene Missourian Upper Pennsylvanian Rauracian Upper
Recommended publications
  • South Dakota to Nebraska
    Geological Society of America Special Paper 325 1998 Lithostratigraphic revision and correlation of the lower part of the White River Group: South Dakota to Nebraska Dennis O. Terry, Jr. Department of Geology, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-0340 ABSTRACT Lithologic correlations between type areas of the White River Group in Nebraska and South Dakota have resulted in a revised lithostratigraphy for the lower part of the White River Group. The following pedostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic units, from oldest to youngest, are newly recognized in northwestern Nebraska and can be correlated with units in the Big Badlands of South Dakota: the Yellow Mounds Pale- osol Equivalent, Interior and Weta Paleosol Equivalents, Chamberlain Pass Forma- tion, and Peanut Peak Member of the Chadron Formation. The term “Interior Paleosol Complex,” used for the brightly colored zone at the base of the White River Group in northwestern Nebraska, is abandoned in favor of a two-part division. The lower part is related to the Yellow Mounds Paleosol Series of South Dakota and rep- resents the pedogenically modified Cretaceous Pierre Shale. The upper part is com- posed of the unconformably overlying, pedogenically modified overbank mudstone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation (which contains the Interior and Weta Paleosol Series in South Dakota). Greenish-white channel sandstones at the base of the Chadron Formation in Nebraska (previously correlated to the Ahearn Member of the Chadron Formation in South Dakota) herein are correlated to the channel sand- stone facies of the Chamberlain Pass Formation in South Dakota. The Chamberlain Pass Formation is unconformably overlain by the Chadron Formation in South Dakota and Nebraska.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleoenvironment of the Late Eocene Chadronian-Age Whitehead Creek Locality (Northwestern Nebraska)
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management Department of Anthropology 10-2019 Paleoenvironment of the Late Eocene Chadronian-Age Whitehead Creek Locality (Northwestern Nebraska) Samantha Mills Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Mills, Samantha, "Paleoenvironment of the Late Eocene Chadronian-Age Whitehead Creek Locality (Northwestern Nebraska)" (2019). Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management. 28. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds/28 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paleoenvironment of the Late Eocene Chadronian-Age Whitehead Creek Locality (Northwestern Nebraska) by Samantha M. Mills A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Functional Morphology October, 2019 Thesis Committee: Matthew Tornow, Chairperson Mark Muñiz Bill Cook Tafline Arbor 2 Abstract Toward the end of the Middle Eocene (40-37mya), the environment started to decline on a global scale. It was becoming more arid, the tropical forests were disappearing from the northern latitudes, and there was an increase in seasonality. Research of the Chadronian (37- 33.7mya) in the Great Plains region of North America has documented the persistence of several mammalian taxa (e.g. primates) that are extinct in other parts of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline of Natural History
    Timeline of natural history This timeline of natural history summarizes significant geological and Life timeline Ice Ages biological events from the formation of the 0 — Primates Quater nary Flowers ←Earliest apes Earth to the arrival of modern humans. P Birds h Mammals – Plants Dinosaurs Times are listed in millions of years, or Karo o a n ← Andean Tetrapoda megaanni (Ma). -50 0 — e Arthropods Molluscs r ←Cambrian explosion o ← Cryoge nian Ediacara biota – z ←Earliest animals o ←Earliest plants i Multicellular -1000 — c Contents life ←Sexual reproduction Dating of the Geologic record – P r The earliest Solar System -1500 — o t Precambrian Supereon – e r Eukaryotes Hadean Eon o -2000 — z o Archean Eon i Huron ian – c Eoarchean Era ←Oxygen crisis Paleoarchean Era -2500 — ←Atmospheric oxygen Mesoarchean Era – Photosynthesis Neoarchean Era Pong ola Proterozoic Eon -3000 — A r Paleoproterozoic Era c – h Siderian Period e a Rhyacian Period -3500 — n ←Earliest oxygen Orosirian Period Single-celled – life Statherian Period -4000 — ←Earliest life Mesoproterozoic Era H Calymmian Period a water – d e Ectasian Period a ←Earliest water Stenian Period -4500 — n ←Earth (−4540) (million years ago) Clickable Neoproterozoic Era ( Tonian Period Cryogenian Period Ediacaran Period Phanerozoic Eon Paleozoic Era Cambrian Period Ordovician Period Silurian Period Devonian Period Carboniferous Period Permian Period Mesozoic Era Triassic Period Jurassic Period Cretaceous Period Cenozoic Era Paleogene Period Neogene Period Quaternary Period Etymology of period names References See also External links Dating of the Geologic record The Geologic record is the strata (layers) of rock in the planet's crust and the science of geology is much concerned with the age and origin of all rocks to determine the history and formation of Earth and to understand the forces that have acted upon it.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeogene Marine Stratigraphy in China
    LETHAIA REVIEW Palaeogene marine stratigraphy in China XIAOQIAO WAN, TIAN JIANG, YIYI ZHANG, DANGPENG XI AND GUOBIAO LI Wan, X., Jiang, T., Zhang, Y., Xi, D. & Li G. 2014: Palaeogene marine stratigraphy in China. Lethaia, Vol. 47, pp. 297–308. Palaeogene deposits are widespread in China and are potential sequences for locating stage boundaries. Most strata are non-marine origin, but marine sediments are well exposed in Tibet, the Tarim Basin of Xinjiang, and the continental margin of East China Sea. Among them, the Tibetan Tethys can be recognized as a dominant marine area, including the Indian-margin strata of the northern Tethys Himalaya and Asian- margin strata of the Gangdese forearc basin. Continuous sequences are preserved in the Gamba–Tingri Basin of the north margin of the Indian Plate, where the Palaeogene sequence is divided into the Jidula, Zongpu, Zhepure and Zongpubei formations. Here, the marine sequence ranges from Danian to middle Priabonian (66–35 ma), and the stage boundaries are identified mostly by larger foraminiferal assemblages. The Paleocene/Eocene boundary is found between the Zongpu and Zhepure forma- tions. The uppermost marine beds are from the top of the Zongpubei Formation (~35 ma), marking the end of Indian and Asian collision. In addition, the marine beds crop out along both sides of the Yarlong Zangbo Suture, where they show a deeper marine facies, yielding rich radiolarian fossils of Paleocene and Eocene. The Tarim Basin of Xinjiang is another important area of marine deposition. Here, marine Palae- ogene strata are well exposed in the Southwest Tarim Depression and Kuqa Depres- sion.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Geologic Map of the Apache Canyon 7.5
    GEOLOGIC MAP AND DIGITAL DATABASE OF THE APACHE CANYON 7.5’ QUADRANGLE, VENTURA AND KERN COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA By Paul Stone1 Digital preparation by P.M. Cossette2 Pamphlet to accompany: Open-File Report 00-359 Version 1.0 2000 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. This database, identified as "Geologic map and digital database of the Apache Canyon 7.5’ quadrangle, Ventura and Kern Counties, California," has been approved for release and publication by the Director of the USGS. Although this database has been reviewed and is substantially complete, the USGS reserves the right to revise the data pursuant to further analysis and review. This database is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U. S. Government may be held liable for any damages resulting from its use. U.S. Geological Survey 1 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 2 West 904 Riverside Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 1 CONTENTS Geologic Explanation............................................................................................................. 3 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 3 Stratigraphy................................................................................................................................ 4 Structure ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oreodonts of the Tick Canyon Formation , Southern California
    PALE0B10s Contributions from the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley No. I June 15, 1967 OREODONTS OF THE TICK CANYON FORMATION , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA by David P. Whistler OREODONTS OF THE TICK CANYON FORMATION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DAVID P. WHISTLER In 1940, Richard H. Jahns reviewed the stratigraphy of the nonmarine Mint Canyon Formation in the eastern part of the Ventura Basin and separated from it a new formation and fauna. Previous to this work, a controversy existed as to the age of the Mint Canyon Formation, for it contained vertebrates considered indicative of both the Miocene and Pliocene (Kew, 1924, Maxson, 1930, and Stirton, 1933). As a partial solut,ion to this controversy, Jahns demonstrated the presence of an erosional unconformity low in the nonmarine sequence which indicated a shift in source area. He redefined the beds below the unconformity as the Tick Canyon Formation (Jahns, 1940, pp. 163-66). Additional fossils discovered in the Tick Canyon Formation since Maxson's work, and certain of the forms described by Maxson, comprise the Tick Canyon fauna. Only two specimens described by Maxson are from the Tick Canyon Formation, UCMP 30046, the type of Miolabis californicus and UCMP 23852, a dentary fragment of a Parahippus. Neither of these permitted a definitive age determination. The additional fauna described by Jahns indicates an Arikareean mammalian age (early Miocene), and there is a noteworthy temporal hiatus between the Tick Canyon fauna and the over­ lying Mint Canyon fauna. In addition, faunas comprising three mammalian ages, late Barstovian, and earlier and late Clarendonian, are now recognized from the Mint Canyon Formation, but this is not the principal concern of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • 46.2 Comparison Between Formations Drilled
    Le Pichon, X., Pautot, G., Auzende, J. M, and Olivet, J. L., Ryan, W. F. B., Hsü, K. J., et al., 1973. Initial Reports of the 1971. La Méditerranée occidentale depuis 1'Oligocène. Deep Sea Drilling Project, Volume 13: Washington (U. S. Schema d'evolution: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., v. 13, p. 145- Government Printing Office). 152. Stoeckinger, W. T., 1976. Valencia Gulf. Offer Deadline Mauffret, A., 1976. Etude géodyamique de la marge des iles nears: Oil Gas J., March, p. 197-204; April, p. 181-183. Baléares. 46.2. COMPARISON BETWEEN FORMATIONS DRILLED AT DSDP SITE 372 IN THE WESTERN MEDITERRANEAN AND EXPOSED SERIES OF LAND G. Bizon and J. J. Bizon, Bureau d'Etudes Industrielles et Cooperation de 1'Institute Français du Pétrole, 92500 Rueil Malmaison, France and B. Biju-Duval, Institut Français du Pétrole, 92500 Rueill-Malmaison ABSTRACT Formations penetrated at Site 372 are compared with series cropping out on land in the Balearic Islands, Southern Spain, and Sardinia. The comparison is extended to wells drilled in the Gulf of Lion. The margin at Menorca and the North Balearic Provencal Basin appear to be at least of Burdigalian age. The entire Miocene is undisturbed at Site 372 in contrast to Mallorca and continental Spain where important tectonic events occurred during middle and upper Miocene. INTRODUCTION By comparing these rocks with those of Mallorca, Bourrouilh considered the age of tectonism to be Because DSDP Site 372 is located only 40 km from middle Miocene. This conclusion is questionable con- the Balearic Islands, it is logical to compare the series sidering that at Site 372 the entire Miocene is undis- penetrated at the site with land equivalents, particu- turbed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia, Carnivora) from the Blancan of Florida
    THREE NEW PROCYONIDS (MAMMALIA, CARNIVORA) FROM THE BLANCAN OF FLORIDA Laura G. Emmert1,2 and Rachel A. Short1,3 ABSTRACT Fossils of the mammalian family Procyonidae are relatively abundant at many fossil localities in Florida. Analysis of specimens from 16 late Blancan localities from peninsular Florida demonstrate the presence of two species of Procyon and one species of Nasua. Procyon gipsoni sp. nov. is slightly larger than extant Procyon lotor and is distinguished by five dental characters including a lack of a crista between the para- cone and hypocone on the P4, absence of a basin at the lingual intersection of the hypocone and protocone on the P4, and a reduced metaconule on the M1. Procyon megalokolos sp. nov. is significantly larger than extant P. lotor and is characterized primarily by morphology of the postcrania, such as an expanded and posteriorly rotated humeral medial epicondyle, more prominent tibial tuberosity, and more pronounced radioulnar notch. Other than larger size, the dentition of P. megalokolos falls within the range of variation observed in extant P. lotor, suggesting that it may be an early member of the P. lotor lineage. Nasua mast- odonta sp. nov. has a unique accessory cusp on the m1 as well as multiple morphological differences in the dentition and postcrania, such as close appression of the trigonid of the m1 and a less expanded medial epicondyle of the humerus. We also synonymize Procyon rexroadensis, formerly the only known Blancan Procyon species in North America, with P. lotor due to a lack of distinct dental morphological features observed in specimens from its type locality in Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great American Biotic Interchange: Patterns and Processes Author(S): S
    The Great American Biotic Interchange: Patterns and Processes Author(s): S. David Webb Source: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Vol. 93, No. 2 (Aug., 2006), pp. 245-257 Published by: Missouri Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035724 . Accessed: 08/04/2014 23:14 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Missouri Botanical Garden Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 137.111.226.20 on Tue, 8 Apr 2014 23:14:05 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE GREAT AMERICAN BIOTIC S. David Webb2 INTERCHANGE: PATTERNS AND PROCESSES1 Abstract Whenthe Panamanianland bridgewas emplacedabout 2.7 Ma, it triggeredthe GreatAmerican Biotic Interchange(GABI), a major mingling of land mammal faunas between North and South America. Four families of northern immigrants (Procyonidae,Felidae, Tayassuidae,and Camelidae)diversified at moderaterates, while four others, Canidae, Mustelidae, Cervidae, and especially Muridae, evolved explosively. As a consequence, half of living South American genera are descendantsof northernimmigrants. The other major consequence of the interchangewas the conquest of tropical North Americaby immigrantsfrom Amazonia, an episode that justifies the term NeotropicalRealm.
    [Show full text]
  • Climatic Shifts Drove Major Contractions in Avian Latitudinal Distributions Throughout the Cenozoic
    Climatic shifts drove major contractions in avian latitudinal distributions throughout the Cenozoic Erin E. Saupea,1,2, Alexander Farnsworthb, Daniel J. Luntb, Navjit Sagooc, Karen V. Phamd, and Daniel J. Fielde,1,2 aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 3AN Oxford, United Kingdom; bSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Clifton, BS8 1SS Bristol, United Kingdom; cDepartment of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; dDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91125; and eDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EQ Cambridge, United Kingdom Edited by Nils Chr. Stenseth, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and approved May 7, 2019 (received for review March 8, 2019) Many higher level avian clades are restricted to Earth’s lower lati- order avian historical biogeography invariably recover strong evi- tudes, leading to historical biogeographic reconstructions favoring a dence for an origin of most modern diversity on southern land- Gondwanan origin of crown birds and numerous deep subclades. masses (2, 6, 11). However, several such “tropical-restricted” clades (TRCs) are repre- The crown bird fossil record has unique potential to reveal sented by stem-lineage fossils well outside the ranges of their clos- where different groups of birds were formerly distributed in deep est living relatives, often on northern continents. To assess the time. Fossil evidence, for example, has long indicated that total- drivers of these geographic disjunctions, we combined ecological group representatives of clades restricted to relatively narrow niche modeling, paleoclimate models, and the early Cenozoic fossil geographic regions today were formerly found in different parts of record to examine the influence of climatic change on avian geo- – graphic distributions over the last ∼56 million years.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontology, Stratigraphy, Paleoenvironment and Paleogeography of the Seventy Tethyan Maastrichtian-Paleogene Foraminiferal Species of Anan, a Review
    Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation Review Article Open Access Paleontology, stratigraphy, paleoenvironment and paleogeography of the seventy Tethyan Maastrichtian-Paleogene foraminiferal species of Anan, a review Abstract Volume 9 Issue 3 - 2021 During the last four decades ago, seventy foraminiferal species have been erected by Haidar Salim Anan the present author, which start at 1984 by one recent agglutinated foraminiferal species Emirates Professor of Stratigraphy and Micropaleontology, Al Clavulina pseudoparisensis from Qusseir-Marsa Alam stretch, Red Sea coast of Egypt. Azhar University-Gaza, Palestine After that year tell now, one planktic foraminiferal species Plummerita haggagae was erected from Egypt (Misr), two new benthic foraminiferal genera Leroyia (with its 3 species) Correspondence: Haidar Salim Anan, Emirates Professor of and Lenticuzonaria (2 species), and another 18 agglutinated species, 3 porcelaneous, 26 Stratigraphy and Micropaleontology, Al Azhar University-Gaza, Lagenid and 18 Rotaliid species. All these species were recorded from Maastrichtian P. O. Box 1126, Palestine, Email and/or Paleogene benthic foraminiferal species. Thirty nine species of them were erected originally from Egypt (about 58 %), 17 species from the United Arab Emirates, UAE (about Received: May 06, 2021 | Published: June 25, 2021 25 %), 8 specie from Pakistan (about 11 %), 2 species from Jordan, and 1 species from each of Tunisia, France, Spain and USA. More than one species have wide paleogeographic distribution around the Northern and Southern Tethys, i.e. Bathysiphon saidi (Egypt, UAE, Hungary), Clavulina pseudoparisensis (Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Arabian Gulf), Miliammina kenawyi, Pseudoclavulina hamdani, P. hewaidyi, Saracenaria leroyi and Hemirobulina bassiounii (Egypt, UAE), Tritaxia kaminskii (Spain, UAE), Orthokarstenia nakkadyi (Egypt, Tunisia, France, Spain), Nonionella haquei (Egypt, Pakistan).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3.Pdf
    A Geoconservation perspective on the trace fossil record associated with the end – Ordovician mass extinction and glaciation in the Welsh Basin Item Type Thesis or dissertation Authors Nicholls, Keith H. Citation Nicholls, K. (2019). A Geoconservation perspective on the trace fossil record associated with the end – Ordovician mass extinction and glaciation in the Welsh Basin. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Chester, United Kingdom. Publisher University of Chester Rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Download date 26/09/2021 02:37:15 Item License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10034/622234 International Chronostratigraphic Chart v2013/01 Erathem / Era System / Period Quaternary Neogene C e n o z o i c Paleogene Cretaceous M e s o z o i c Jurassic M e s o z o i c Jurassic Triassic Permian Carboniferous P a l Devonian e o z o i c P a l Devonian e o z o i c Silurian Ordovician s a n u a F y r Cambrian a n o i t u l o v E s ' i k s w o Ichnogeneric Diversity k p e 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 n 23 r e 25 d 27 o 29 M 31 33 35 37 39 T 41 43 i 45 47 m 49 e 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 Number of Ichnogenera (Treatise Part W) Ichnogeneric Diversity 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 n 23 r e 25 d 27 o 29 M 31 33 35 37 39 T 41 43 i 45 47 m 49 e 51 53 55 57 59 61 c i o 63 z 65 o e 67 a l 69 a 71 P 73 75 77 79 81 83 n 85 a i r 87 b 89 m 91 a 93 C Number of Ichnogenera (Treatise Part W)
    [Show full text]