Geitoneura Klugii)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Marbled Xenica (Geitoneura klugii) Wingspan - ~40mm Photo: Tony Morton Note 1: Both are female. The upper side of the butterfly wings are shown on the left and the underside side of the butterfly wings are shown on the right. Males and females are similar, but females are paler above. Note 2: The plant name on the bottom right refers to the plants upon which the butterfly larvae (caterpillars) feed. Other Common Names: Klug’s Xenica Family of Butterflies: Nymphalidae (Browns and Nymphs) Tony Morton’s documented records of Marbled Xenica from the local area (between 2000 to 2013): Six Date Location Notes 29-Feb-2000 Vaughan walk 10-Jan-2001 Rotunda & Ridge, Kalimna Park 16-Jan-2001 Green Gully Rd. walk 19-Dec-2005 Kalimna Park 1 Butterflies of the Mount Alexander Shire – A Castlemaine Field Naturalists Club publication Date Location Notes 15-Jan-2011 Bot Gardens, off Froomes Road, C'maine 1-Jan-2013 Kalimna Park fresh, several Other documented local observations: None Distribution Across Victoria (from Field 2013): Found across most of southern and central Victoria. Larval Host Plants (Field 2013): Native grasses such as Wallaby Grass (Austrodanthonia spp.), Kangaroo Grass (Themeda triandra) and some tussock grasses (Poa spp.). Introduced grasses such as Annual Veldt Grass (Erhardta longiflora) and Fescue (Vulpia spp.). Larval association with ants (Field 2013): None. Adult Flight Times in Victoria (from Field 2013): Adults have been recorded from October to April, and most commonly from December to February. One generation per year. Conservation Status: National Butterfly Action Plan (2002): No conservation status Australian Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Not listed Victorian Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988: Not listed Advisory List of Threatened Victorian Invertebrates (DSE 2009): Not listed Other Notes: Mount Alexander Shire is near the northern/inland extent of its distribution in Victoria. Known to hilltop. Males will defend their areas against other males. Occurs in a variety of woodland and forest habitats that have an adequate grassy understorey. References and further reading: Braby, M. F. (2004) The Complete Field Guide to the Butterflies of Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (2009) Advisory List of Threatened Invertebrate Fauna in Victoria – 2009. Department of Sustainability and Environment, East Melbourne, Victoria (http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/environment-and-wildlife/threatened-species-and- communities/threatened-species-advisory-lists) Field, R.P. (2013) Butterflies: Identification and Life History. Museum Victoria Publishing, Melbourne. Sands, D.P.A. and New, T.R. (2002) The Action Plan for Australian Butterflies. Environment Australia, Canberra (http://www.environment.gov.au/resource/action-plan-australian-butterflies) 2 Butterflies of the Mount Alexander Shire – A Castlemaine Field Naturalists Club publication Museum of Victoria Bioinformatics – Australian Butterflies: The Victorian Fauna http://museumvictoria.com.au/bioinformatics/butter/ 3 Butterflies of the Mount Alexander Shire – A Castlemaine Field Naturalists Club publication .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Special Issue3.7 MB
Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
[Show full text]
The Radiation of Satyrini Butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): A
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 161, 64–87. With 8 figures The radiation of Satyrini butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a challenge for phylogenetic methods CARLOS PEÑA1,2*, SÖREN NYLIN1 and NIKLAS WAHLBERG1,3 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Av. Arenales 1256, Apartado 14-0434, Lima-14, Peru 3Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland Received 24 February 2009; accepted for publication 1 September 2009 We have inferred the most comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis to date of butterflies in the tribe Satyrini. In order to obtain a hypothesis of relationships, we used maximum parsimony and model-based methods with 4435 bp of DNA sequences from mitochondrial and nuclear genes for 179 taxa (130 genera and eight out-groups). We estimated dates of origin and diversification for major clades, and performed a biogeographic analysis using a dispersal–vicariance framework, in order to infer a scenario of the biogeographical history of the group. We found long-branch taxa that affected the accuracy of all three methods. Moreover, different methods produced incongruent phylogenies. We found that Satyrini appeared around 42 Mya in either the Neotropical or the Eastern Palaearctic, Oriental, and/or Indo-Australian regions, and underwent a quick radiation between 32 and 24 Mya, during which time most of its component subtribes originated. Several factors might have been important for the diversification of Satyrini: the ability to feed on grasses; early habitat shift into open, non-forest habitats; and geographic bridges, which permitted dispersal over marine barriers, enabling the geographic expansions of ancestors to new environ- ments that provided opportunities for geographic differentiation, and diversification.
[Show full text]
Download Full Article 1.8MB .Pdf File
March 1951 ME�!. NAT. 1\1us. VICT., 17, 1951 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1951.17.09 NOT1ES ON AUSrl1RALIJ\N H.lIOPALOCliJH,A vVl rl1 lI DESCRIPrr IONS OJ11 N Ji�vV SU l�S J->11:<J I Ji�S AND LJ li1E 111 :�;rroHJ 1�s By A. N. Uurus, /J.S<:., EHlomologist} Nat·imw.l 11Ius<'1lJJI, of Victuri((, l11ainily H l�SP !£HJ DAJD r 1 Subfamily 1 ltAPJ1JZPl1lNA l1� 11 c:-;pc rill a flrt uesemu.; fln U<'s<·c·u:-; "\Vhs. and 11cspcrilln flu V<'sa,u:-; flnvin Whs. H. donnysa flavcsceJ/s "\\Tlu-;. awl II. d011,J1 ysn flavi{(, \Vhs. were described by Waterhouse (1927, 1941) as geographical ra(·.es of 11. donnysa 1-lew. 11. dom1;1pw, doml;IJS<t, Ilcw. was <les(:rihf'd in 1868 by llcwitso11 fr0111 specimcrn-; 1·eputcd to come from .Moretou Bay, Queensland. r11his is clearly set out by vVaterhonse ( 19:n). Waterhouse expresses a doubt as regards Morctou Hay being the correct locality but, 011 a visit to England some years ago, established the fad that ] fcwitson did receive his eastc1·u Aus tralian material from near Brisbane. II. dmrnysn is uot a cn11m1011 butterfly in southern Qncenslarnl arnl 1Iorthen1 New 8outh Wall's. Its distribution extends through south - eastern, southern, and south - western Austi·alia, where it has developed a 11muhe1· of geographi�al t·cwes. rrliese arc all li:-;tcd by Waterhouse (1941) and nmy be annexed to the following rcgiolls: II. donnysa donnysa Hew. 'I'hc coastal portion of' New South \Vales ahout 40 miles south of Syducy to the Newcastle area.
[Show full text]
Foliage Insect Diversity in Dry Eucalypt Forests in Eastern Tasmania
Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 136, 2002 17 FOLIAGE INSECT DIVERSITY IN DRY EUCALYPT FORESTS IN EASTERN TASMANIA by H.J. Elliott, R. Bashford, S.J. Jarman and M.G. Neyland (with four tables, one text-figure and two appendices) ELLIOTT, H.]., BASHFORD, R., JARMAN,S.]' & NEYLAND, M.G., 2002 (3l:xii): Foliage insect diversity in dry eucalypt forests in eastern Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings ofthe Royal Society afTasmania 136: 17-34. ISSN 0080-4703. Forestry Tasmania, 79 Melville St., Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia. Species numbers and composition of the insect fauna occurring on trees and shrubs were studied in dry eucalypt forests in eastern Tasmania over nine years. In all, 1164 named and putative species representing 17 orders and 157 families were collected. The bulk of the species belonged to the orders Coleoptera (28%), Hymenoptera (25%), Hemiptera (18%), Lepidoptera (14%) and Diptera (10%). Of the species collected, 388 -- about one-third -- were identified at least to genus or species level. These included 21 named species not previously listed in the Tasmanian insect fauna and 90 undescribed species. A list of 22 host plants for 171 insect species was compiled from records of 132 insect species observed feeding during the study and from previous records ofinsect/host plant associations for 39 insect species found on the study plots. Most insects were feeding on eucalypts (127 insect species) and acacias (38 species). The most widely distributed and commonly collected species were several well-known pests ofeucalypts: Gonipterus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Uraba lugens (Lepidoptera: N octuidae), Amorbus obscuricornis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), Chaetophyes compacta (Hemiptera: Machaerotidae) and Eriococcus coriaceous(Hemiptera: Eriococcidae).
[Show full text]
The' 1972 Annual Meeting
Number 5 NEWS 15 September, 1972 of the LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Editorial Committee of the NEWS . .... EDITOR: Dr. Charles V. Covell, Jr., Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Louisville, Louisville, Ky., USA, 40208 ASSOC. EDITOR: Dr. Paul A. Opler, Div. of Entomology, 201 Wellman Hall, Univ. of California, Berkeley, California, U'SA, 94720 Jo Brewer John Heath F. W. Preston J. Donald Eff G. Hesselbarth G. W,. Rawson Robert Langston L. Mike Van Buskirk Thomas C. Emmel Lloyd M. Martin H. A. Freeman F. Bryant Mather E. C. Welling M. L. Paul Grey K. W. Philip M. C. Nielsen The' 1972 Annual Meeting The 25th Anniversary of the Lepidopterists' Society was celebrated in high style on the campus of Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas, June 22-25. Roy and Connie Kendall began over a year ago to prepare, and had things well in hand for the arrival of 60 dues-paying members with wives, young'uns, and friends to bring the total to about 100. Twenty-three states were represented, as well as Canada and England. Many of those in attendance put up in the dormitories; others, usually identified during the sessions by their bloodshot and leaden eyes, stayed at a Travelodge, where a new journal called Frassia had its unof ficial inception, and where informal discourses on Colias were held into the wee hours. On Thursday a combined Executive Council and Publications Board meeting was held with Pres. Lloyd Martin was chair man. Some of the matters dealt with are as follows: (1.) Changes in our Constitution to bring it into conformity with require ments of the Internal Revenue Service to make non-profit status of the Society possible (you will be asked to vote on these changes asoutlined in the next issue of the JOURNAL).
[Show full text]
Running Head 1 the AGE of BUTTERFLIES REVISITED
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/259184; this version posted February 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Running head 2 THE AGE OF BUTTERFLIES REVISITED (AND TESTED) 3 Title 4 The Trials and Tribulations of Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of 5 Divergence Analyses: the Age of Butterflies Revisited. 6 7 Authors 8 NICOLAS CHAZOT1*, NIKLAS WAHLBERG1, ANDRÉ VICTOR LUCCI FREITAS2, 9 CHARLES MITTER3, CONRAD LABANDEIRA3,4, JAE-CHEON SOHN5, RANJIT KUMAR 10 SAHOO6, NOEMY SERAPHIM7, RIENK DE JONG8, MARIA HEIKKILÄ9 11 Affiliations 12 1Department of Biology, Lunds Universitet, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden. 13 2Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de 14 Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Caixa postal 6109, 15 Barão Geraldo 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 16 3Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A. 17 4Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian 18 Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA; Department of Entomology and BEES 19 Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20741; and Key Lab of Insect 20 Evolution and Environmental Change, School of Life Sciences, Capital Normal 21 University, Beijing 100048, bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/259184; this version posted February 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report
Department of Environment and Conservation and Environment of Department Department of Environment and Conservation 2008-2009 Annual Report 2008-2009 Annual Report Annual 2008-2009 2009195 E R N M O V E G N T E O H T F W A E I S L T A E R R N A U S T Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the Corporate Communications Branch, Department of Environment and Conservation. For more information contact: Department of Environment and Conservation Level 4 The Atrium 168 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 6364 6500 Facsimile (08) 6364 6520 Recommended reference The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Environment and Conservation 2008–2009 Annual Report, Department of Environment and Conservation, 2009. We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at www.dec.wa.gov.au. ISSN 1835-1131 (Print) ISSN 1835-114X (Online) 8 September 2009 Letter to THE MINISter Back Contents Forward Hon Donna Faragher MLC Minister for Environment In accordance with section 63 of the Financial Management Act 2006, I have pleasure in submitting for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of the Department of Environment and Conservation for the period 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009. This report has been prepared in accordance with provisions of the Financial Management Act 2006. Keiran McNamara Director General DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 2008–2009 ANNUAL REPORT 3 DIRECTOR GENERAL’S FOREWORD Back Contents Forward This is the third annual report of the Department of Environment and Conservation since it was created through the merger of the former Department of Environment and Department of Conservation and Land Management.
[Show full text]
A Method for Conducting Mark-Release-Recapture Studies of the Graceful Sun-Moth Synemon Gratiosa (Lepidoptera: Castniidae) Andrew A.E
RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 33 181–186 (2018) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.33(2).2018.181-186 A method for conducting mark-release-recapture studies of the graceful sun-moth Synemon gratiosa (Lepidoptera: Castniidae) Andrew A.E. Williams1,*, Rebecca A.M. Coppen2 and Matthew R. Williams2 1 Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Woodvale Wildlife Research Centre, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia. ² Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Keiran McNamara Conservation Science Centre, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983, Australia. * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT – A mark-release-recapture methodology designed for monitoring the graceful sun- moth Synemon gratiosa Westwood is described. Because of the sun-moth’s small size and fragility, traditional marking methods were found to be inappropriate. To enable marks to be applied and minimise handling, individual sun-moths were temporarily immobilised using either ethyl acetate or by cooling. A series of 1–3 dots were then placed on the forewing(s) using metallic ink permanent marker pens. By varying the location and colour of the dots, up to 232 individuals could be given unique marks. The use of ethyl acetate resulted in several deaths and had a large effect on recapture rate and apparent survival. However, the cooling method resulted in no detectable effect of marking on subsequent survival. The method is suitable for small or fragile Lepidoptera and other insects. KEYWORDS: Marking effect, monitoring, Lepidoptera, endemic, Western Australia INTRODUCTION Gall 1984). The typical method of marking Lepidoptera Mark-release-recapture (MRR) is a method of is to capture the specimen in a net, then remove it by obtaining useful demographic information about holding the wings between the thumb and index fnger animals, including insects (Gall 1985; Pollock et al.
[Show full text]
The Victorian Naturalist
J The Victorian Naturalist Volume 113(1) 199 February Club of Victoria Published by The Field Naturalists since 1884 MUSEUM OF VICTOR A 34598 From the Editors Members Observations As an introduction to his naturalist note on page 29, George Crichton had written: 'Dear Editors late years the Journal has become I Was not sure if it was of any relevance, as of ' very scientific, and ordinary nature reports or gossip of little importance We would be very sorry if members felt they could not contribute to The Victorian Naturalist, and we assure all our readers that the editors would be more than pleased to publish their nature reports or notes. We can, however, only print material that we actually receive and you are encouraged to send in your observations and notes or suggestions for topics you would like to see published. These articles would be termed Naturalist Notes - see in our editorial policy below. Editorial Policy Scope The Victorian Naturalist publishes articles on all facets of natural history. Its primary aims are to stimulate interest in natural history and to encourage the publication of arti- cles in both formal and informal styles on a wide range of natural history topics. Authors may submit the material in the following forms: Research Reports - succinct and original scientific communications. Contributions - may consist of reports, comments, observations, survey results, bib- liographies or other material relating to natural history. The scope is broad and little defined to encourage material on a wide range of topics and in a range of styles. This allows inclusion of material that makes a contribution to our knowledge of natural his- tory but for which the traditional format of scientific papers is not appropriate.
[Show full text]
Border Rivers-Gwydir, New South Wales
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
[Show full text]
Table of Contents
Department of Environmental Biology Diversity of butterflies and day-flying moths in urban habitat fragments, south-western Australia Matthew R. Williams This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Curtin University of Technology February 2009 Table of Contents Statement of originality ......................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................ 6 Abstract ................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter 1 – General Introduction ......................................................................... 9 1.1 Habitat fragmentation ..................................................................................... 9 1.1.1 Ecological impacts of fragmentation......................................................... 9 1.1.1.1 Habitat reduction ......................................................................... 10 1.1.1.2 Habitat alteration ......................................................................... 10 1.1.1.3 Edge effects ................................................................................ 11 1.1.1.4 Connectivity between fragments and barrier effects ...................... 11 1.1.1.5 Habitat degradation ..................................................................... 11 1.1.1.6 New habitats ..............................................................................
[Show full text]
Proposal of Wildlife Trade Operation for David Cassat (PDF
Proposal for Wild Harvest and Export of Invertebrates submitted for approval under EPBC Act 1999 1. Title and introduction This section should identify the species concerned, the management authority (if applicable), relevant State and Commonwealth legislation and a general introduction to the management regime. Suggested content includes: 1.1 Scientific name(s) 1.2 Common name (if applicable) 1.3 Location of harvest 1.4 Description of what is being harvested (for example, live animals; skins; meat; larvae; eggs; branches; whole plants), including size and (juvenile or mature) age of the specimen(s). Where possible, please include a photograph of the specimen. 1.5 Is the species protected under State or Federal legislation? If so, provide details of the legislation and the status of the species under the legislation. 1. Introduction The purpose of this proposed operation is to supply local and over-seas insect collectors with legally harvested insect specimens. The applicant has collected insects in SE NSW for approximately 20 years and is very familiar with the species and habitats of the area. This knowledge and experience is invaluable in determining where and when to collect, as well as what quantities per taxon are suitable for sustainable harvesting. Taxa covered This proposal covers the harvest of invertebrate species included in the taxa listed in the Appendix, except for those species listed under the EPBC Act as threatened (excluding the conservation dependent category), endangered, or vulnerable. The Appendix also includes an annual quota to be harvested per taxa that must not be exceeded. The list can be amended by DEWHA if additional information becomes available on a particular species within a taxon.
[Show full text]