The Victorian Naturalist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Victorian Naturalist J The Victorian Naturalist Volume 113(1) 199 February Club of Victoria Published by The Field Naturalists since 1884 MUSEUM OF VICTOR A 34598 From the Editors Members Observations As an introduction to his naturalist note on page 29, George Crichton had written: 'Dear Editors late years the Journal has become I Was not sure if it was of any relevance, as of ' very scientific, and ordinary nature reports or gossip of little importance We would be very sorry if members felt they could not contribute to The Victorian Naturalist, and we assure all our readers that the editors would be more than pleased to publish their nature reports or notes. We can, however, only print material that we actually receive and you are encouraged to send in your observations and notes or suggestions for topics you would like to see published. These articles would be termed Naturalist Notes - see in our editorial policy below. Editorial Policy Scope The Victorian Naturalist publishes articles on all facets of natural history. Its primary aims are to stimulate interest in natural history and to encourage the publication of arti- cles in both formal and informal styles on a wide range of natural history topics. Authors may submit the material in the following forms: Research Reports - succinct and original scientific communications. Contributions - may consist of reports, comments, observations, survey results, bib- liographies or other material relating to natural history. The scope is broad and little defined to encourage material on a wide range of topics and in a range of styles. This allows inclusion of material that makes a contribution to our knowledge of natural his- tory but for which the traditional format of scientific papers is not appropriate. Naturalist Notes - short and informal natural history communications. These may include reports on excursions, talks or noteworthy observations. Book Reviews - priority is given to major Australian publications on natural history. Whilst reviews are commissioned, the editors welcome suggestions of books to be considered for review. News - any items of news concerning the FNCV. Obituaries - due to space restrictions please try to limit this to 500 words and one photograph. The style should follow the traditional format of scientific papers. Preference will be given to short articles not exceeding 2500 words. Review Procedures Research reports and some contributions are subject to refereeing. The Victorian Naturalist is not in general a taxonomic journal but will publish taxonomic papers not provided for in Australian taxonomic journals. The editors reserve the right to accept or reject material submitted for publication. Authors Copies Five complimentary copies of the journal will be sent to authors for their use. Reprints and additional copies of the journal can be arranged at the time of the final submission of the paper. 6 The Victorian Naturalist F.NCv. Volume 113(1)1996 February Editors: Ed and Pat Grey Research Reports Negative Effects of Fuel Reduction Burning on Habitat of Grey- crowned Babbler, by P. Adam and D. Robinson 4 Drifting Sand and Marram Grass on the South-west Coast of Victoria in the Last Century, by J Heathcote and S. Maroske .. 10 Contributions A Transient Soil Seed Bank for the Yam Daisy, by I.D. hunt.... 1 The Little Pygmy-possum: An Addition to the Fauna of South-west Victoria, by L.E. Conole 20 Naturalist Notes Wombat Behaviour, by G.K. Smith 25 Middle Yarra Timelines: High Summer, by G, Jameson, Naturalist in Residence 26 Greater Glider with Pouched Young, by R.G. Taylor 29 Magpies, by G.A. Crichton 29 How to be a Field Naturalist Photography, by W. Clark 31 Book Reviews Saving a Continent. Towards a Sustainable Future, by David Smith, reviewer Robert Wallis 31 The Dingo in Australia and Asia, by Laurie Corbett, reviewer Brian Coman 32 Wildlife of the Australian Snow-country, by Ken Green and William Osborne, reviewer Robert Wallis 34 Kangaroos. The Biology of the Largest Marsupials, Coulson 35 by Terence T. Dawson, reviewer Graeme The Fauna of Tasmania: Birds, by R.H. Green, 37 reviewer Peter Brown - Frank Shepherd, In Search of the Buttercup A Ramble, by 38 reviewer R.J. Fletcher ISSN 0042-5184 G.K. Smith, (see page 25) Cover: Wombat carrying young. Photo by Research Reports Negative Effects of Fuel-reduction Burning on the Habitat of the Grey-crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis P. Adam 1 and I). Robinson Abstract We examined the effects of annual fuel-reduction burning on the roadside habiiai of the endan- gered Grey crowned Babbler Pomatostomus temporalis in the former Violet Town Shire in north- ern Victoria. Approximately 25% of the Victorian population of the Grey-crowned Babbler is found ill Violet Town Slme, and mote than W;; (if those birds depend on remnant woodland habitat found along the roadsides. Conservation oi the (Irey-erowned Babbler therefore requires appropriate man- agement of roadside habitat, The numbers of trees, saplings, wattles, Babblers' nests and Babblers were recorded along the burnt and unburnl sides of an I I km section of strategic firebreak road which supported 14 known groups of Gfey-crowned Babblers. With the exception of trees more than 10 m tall, all other si/e classes of trees and wattles were less common on the burnt side of the road than on the unburn! side. Five times as many Babblers' nests were recorded in plants on the unburnl side of the road as on the burnt side, and all Babblers seen during the survey were observed on the unburnl side. The results thus indicate that fuel-reduction burning is having a considerable impact on the habitat of the Grey-Crowned Babbler and that fire-prevention practices need to be modified to protect roadside habitat for the Circy-cruwned Babbler and other understorey-dependent species, A range of alternative fire-prevention practices is suggested here. (The Victorian Naturalist 11.1(1) 1996,4 9) Introduction weed invasion, and fire prevention works The Grey-crowned Babbler Pomatosto- (Robinson el al. in prep.; Robinson and temporalis is a threatened species mus of Davidson in prep.). Predation by cats and bird in south-eastern woodland Australia. birds may also be a significant cause of It lives in family groups of about two to decline in certain districts (Robinson and fifteen birds which occupy permanent ter- Davidson in prep.). ritories of about ten hectares in si/e. In The habitat of the Grey-crowned contrast to many species of lite birds, Babbler in Victoria comprises five critical Grey-crowned Babbler sleeps in a nest at elements: woodland or open-forest vegeta- night, the whole family roosting together tion communities on fertile or heavy soils; in a single nest. The bulky stick nests are relatively many trees in the immediate built in eucalypt saplings, small trees or landscape in contrast to sites without mature wattles, and several nests ate usu- Grey-crowned Babblers; relatively many ally in active use by the same family at trees larger than about 60 cm trunk diame- any one tune. The Grey-crowned Babbler ter at breast height (dbh); an understorey has recently become extinct in south-cast of young trees and shrubs in the 10-25 cm em South Australia, is endangered in dbh range for nest sites and shelter and a Victoria (CNR 1995) and is declining in relatively sparse ground layer with more parts of New South Wales and southern litter and less grass cover than at non-bab- Queensland (Robinson el al. in prep.). In bler sites (Robinson and Davidson in every part of its range, the principal cause prep.). Wherever one or more of these of decline has been extensive habitat habitat elements is missing, or is removed, clearing (Robinson and Davidson in Grey-crowned Babblers are absent, or prep.). The other significant cause of soon disappear (Robinson and Davidson in decline has been, and still is. the severe prep.). modification of Babbler habitat by a range In northern Victoria, the most signifi- of degrading processes, notably grazing, cant element missing in the remaining intensified land use, roadside earthworks, woodland landscape is an understorey of young trees and shrubs. In the former I RMB 2066, VTffltol Town ,««>" J RMBti34,Bei»lU3673 Violet Town Shire - the most important The Victorian Naturalist Research Reports locality in Victoria for Grey-crowned be managed as strategic firebreaks for the - Babblers 370 km (80%) of the 463 km of prevention of the spread of fire and access public road surveyed in 1993 had a sparse in the event of a fire. However, in contrast understorey or none at all, and 96 km to the situation in most other Shires, two (93%) of the 103 km of unused roads with of these roads also provide habitat for the trees had a sparse understorey or none at Grey-crowned Babbler, altogether sup- all (Robinson et al. in prep.). While graz- porting some 18 groups ( 20% of the ing is the major cause of death of young Shire's population and 5% of the State's trees and shrubs in the woodland land- population) (Fig. 1). We used one of these scape, fire-prevention works along select- strategic firebreak roads as our study urea. ed roadsides in Violet Town Shire have The Violet Town-Dookie Road is a been a significant, additional cause of the three-chain-wide (60 m) road reserve death of young trees and shrubs. Here we which supports 14 Babbler groups over a report on the effects of that control-burn- 14 km section (Fig. 1). Management of ing on the habitat and abundance of the both sides of the road in the Babbler sec- Grey-crowned Babbler. tion has been similar over the past 30 years, with the one exception of fire con- Study Area and Methods trol (P.
Recommended publications
  • Resource Partitioning Among Five Sympatric Mammalian Herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, South- Eastern Australia
    Resource partitioning among five sympatric mammalian herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, south- eastern Australia Naomi Ezra Davis Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2010 Department of Zoology The University of Melbourne i Abstract This thesis combines multiple approaches to improve our understanding of large herbivore ecology and organisation in a contemporary assemblage made up of species with independent evolutionary histories on Yanakie Isthmus, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia. In particular, this thesis compares niche parameters among populations of five sympatric native and introduced herbivore species by simultaneously assessing overlap in resource use along two dimensions (spatial and trophic) at multiple scales, thereby providing insight into resource partitioning and competition within this herbivore assemblage. Faecal pellet counts demonstrated that inter-specific overlap in herbivore habitat use on Yanakie Isthmus was low, suggesting that spatial partitioning of habitat resources had occured. However, resource partitioning appeared to be independent of coevolutionary history. Low overlap in habitat use implies low competition, and the lack of clear shifts in habitat use from preferred to suboptimal habitats suggested that inter-specific competition was not strong enough to cause competitive exclusion. However, low overlap in habitat use between the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus and other species, and preferential use by rabbits (and avoidance by other species) of the habitat that appeared to have the highest carrying capacity, suggested that rabbits excluded other grazing herbivores from preferred habitat. High overlap in habitat use was apparent between some species, particularly grazers, indicating some potential for competition if resources are limiting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of Robinson Crusoe Island (Isla Masatierra), Juan
    The Vegetation ofRobinson Crusoe Island (Isla Masatierra), Juan Fernandez Archipelago, Chile1 Josef Greimler,2,3 Patricio Lopez 5., 4 Tod F. Stuessy, 2and Thomas Dirnbiick5 Abstract: Robinson Crusoe Island of the Juan Fernandez Archipelago, as is the case with many oceanic islands, has experienced strong human disturbances through exploitation ofresources and introduction of alien biota. To understand these impacts and for purposes of diversity and resource management, an accu­ rate assessment of the composition and structure of plant communities was made. We analyzed the vegetation with 106 releves (vegetation records) and subsequent Twinspan ordination and produced a detailed colored map at 1: 30,000. The resultant map units are (1) endemic upper montane forest, (2) endemic lower montane forest, (3) Ugni molinae shrubland, (4) Rubus ulmifolius­ Aristotelia chilensis shrubland, (5) fern assemblages, (6) Libertia chilensis assem­ blage, (7) Acaena argentea assemblage, (8) native grassland, (9) weed assemblages, (10) tall ruderals, and (11) cultivated Eucalyptus, Cupressus, and Pinus. Mosaic patterns consisting of several communities are recognized as mixed units: (12) combined upper and lower montane endemic forest with aliens, (13) scattered native vegetation among rocks at higher elevations, (14) scattered grassland and weeds among rocks at lower elevations, and (15) grassland with Acaena argentea. Two categories are included that are not vegetation units: (16) rocks and eroded areas, and (17) settlement and airfield. Endemic forests at lower elevations and in drier zones of the island are under strong pressure from three woody species, Aristotelia chilensis, Rubus ulmifolius, and Ugni molinae. The latter invades native forests by ascending dry slopes and ridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Transline Infrastructure Corridor Vegetation and Flora Survey
    TROPICANA GOLD PROJECT Tropicana – Transline Infrastructure Corridor Vegetation and Flora Survey 025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 phone: 9322 1944 fax: 9322 1599 ACN 088 821 425 ABN 63 088 821 425 www.ecologia.com.au Tropicana Gold Project Tropicana Joint Venture Tropicana-Transline Infrastructure Corridor: Vegetation and Flora Survey July 2009 Tropicana Gold Project Tropicana-Transline Infrastructure Corridor Flora and Vegetation Survey © ecologia Environment (2009). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of ecologia Environment and/or AngloGold Ashanti Australia. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for AngloGold Ashanti Australia. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of ecologia Environment and/or AngloGold Ashanti Australia. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington St West Perth WA 6005 Ph: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] i Tropicana Gold Project Tropicana-Transline Infrastructure Corridor Flora and Vegetation Survey Executive Summary The Tropicana JV (TJV) is currently undertaking pre-feasibility studies on the viability of establishing the Tropicana Gold Project (TGP), which is centred on the Tropicana and Havana gold prospects. The proposed TGP is located approximately 330 km east north-east of Kalgoorlie, and 15 km west of the Plumridge Lakes Nature Reserve, on the western edge of the Great Victoria Desert (GVD) biogeographic region of Western Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Methods Results
    Papers and Proceedings Royal Society ofTasmania, Volume 1999 103 THE CHARACTERISTICS AND MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS OF THE VEGETATION AND FLORA OF THE HUNTINGFIELD AREA, SOUTHERN TASMANIA by J.B. Kirkpatrick (with two tables, four text-figures and one appendix) KIRKPATRICK, J.B., 1999 (31:x): The characteristics and management problems of the vegetation and flora of the Huntingfield area, southern Tasmania. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 133(1): 103-113. ISSN 0080-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University ofTasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. The Huntingfield area has a varied vegetation, including substantial areas ofEucalyptus amygdalina heathy woodland, heath, buttongrass moorland and E. amygdalina shrubbyforest, with smaller areas ofwetland, grassland and E. ovata shrubbyforest. Six floristic communities are described for the area. Two hundred and one native vascular plant taxa, 26 moss species and ten liverworts are known from the area, which is particularly rich in orchids, two ofwhich are rare in Tasmania. Four other plant species are known to be rare and/or unreserved inTasmania. Sixty-four exotic plantspecies have been observed in the area, most ofwhich do not threaten the native biodiversity. However, a group offire-adapted shrubs are potentially serious invaders. Management problems in the area include the maintenance ofopen areas, weed invasion, pathogen invasion, introduced animals, fire, mechanised recreation, drainage from houses and roads, rubbish dumping and the gathering offirewood, sand and plants. Key Words: flora, forest, heath, Huntingfield, management, Tasmania, vegetation, wetland, woodland. INTRODUCTION species with the most cover in the shrub stratum (dominant species) was noted. If another species had more than half The Huntingfield Estate, approximately 400 ha of forest, the cover ofthe dominant one it was noted as a codominant.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks Association of the Australian Capital Territory Inc
    Volume 53 Number 2 June 2016 National Parks Association of the Australian Capital Territory Inc. Burning Aranda Bushland Canberra Nature Map Jagungal Wilderness NPA Bulletin Volume 53 number 2 June 2016 Articles by contributors may not necessarily reflect association opinion or objectives. CONTENTS NPA outings program, June – September 2016 ...............13–16 From the Committee ................................................................2 Bushwalks Rod Griffiths and Christine Goonrey Exciting Rendezvous Valley pack walk ..........................17 The vital work of the National Parks Australia Council ..........3 Esther Gallant Rod Griffiths Mount Tantangara ...........................................................18 NPA's Nature Play program .....................................................3 Brian Slee Graham Scully Pretty Plain ......................................................................19 Aranda Bushland's recent hazard-reduction burn ....................4 Brian Slee Judy Kelly, with Michael Doherty and John Brickhill Glenburn Precinct news..........................................................20 Obituaries .................................................................................6 Col McAlister Book reviews. Leaf Litter, exploring the Mysteries................21 The National Rock Garden ......................................................7 of a Hidden World by Rachel Tonkin Compiled by Kevin McCue Judy Kelly Stolen .......................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden in Plain Sight—A New Species of Lichen Strigula Oleistrata March 2020 (Strigulaceae) from New Zealand
    TRILEPIDEA Newsletter of the New Zealand Plant Conservation Network NO. 196 Hidden in Plain sight—a new species of lichen Strigula oleistrata March 2020 (Strigulaceae) from New Zealand. Deadline for next issue: Marley Ford ([email protected]); Dan J. Blanchon ([email protected]), Friday 19 April 2020 School of Environmental & Animal Sciences, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland; SUBMIT AN ARTICLE Peter J. de Lange ([email protected]), School of Environmental & Animal TO THE NEWSLETTER Sciences, Unitec Institute of Technology, Auckland Contributions are welcome New Zealand has a surprising diversity of Strigula. 25 species of the genus are found to the newsletter at any here out of the c.70 species recognised; representing over a third of the known species time. The closing date for articles for each issue is (Galloway 2007, Lücking 2008, Hyde et al. 2013). Most of these species are foliicolous, approximately the 15th of meaning that they live on the surfaces of leaves. However, a few species do colonise each month. rocks and bark (Galloway 2007). Articles may be edited and used in the newsletter and/ Between 2016 and 2017 the senior author undertook a third year, level 7 School of or on the website news page. Environmental & Animal Sciences self-directed paper studying Strigula novae- The Network will publish zelandiae at the Unitec Institute of Technology Herbarium (UNITEC). Strigula novae- almost any article about zelandiae is a foliicolous species that is sometimes known as ‘silver paint lichen’, because plants and plant conservation with a particular focus on the when dead the thallus imparts a silvery patterning on the leaves it has colonised.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc
    Native Orchid Society of South Australia Inc. Journal Diuris calcicola One of new orchid species named in 2015 Photo: R. Bates June 2016 Volume 40 No. 5 Native Orchid Society of South Australia June 2016 Vol. 40 No. 5 The Native Orchid Society of South Australia promotes the conservation of orchids through preservation of natural habitat and cultivation. Except with the documented official representation of the management committee, no person may represent the Society on any matter. All native President orchids are protected in the wild; their collection without written Vacant Government permit is illegal. Vice President Robert Lawrence Contents Email: [email protected] Title Author Page Secretary Bulletin Board 54 Rosalie Lawrence Vice President’s Report Robert Lawrence 55 Email:[email protected] May Field Trip – From a newbie Vicki Morris 56 Treasurer NOSSA Seed Kits 2016 Les Nesbitt 57 Christine Robertson The Orchid & Mycorrhiza Fungus… Rob Soergel 57 Email: [email protected] Editor Growing Exercise Recall Les Nesbitt 58 Lorraine Badger Diuris Project Report Les Nesbitt 58 Assistant Editor - Rob Soergel May Meeting Review Rob Soergel 58 Email: [email protected] Pterostylis - Reprint 59 Committee Letters to the editor 60 Michael Clark May Orchid Pictures Competition Rosalie Lawrence 62 Bob Bates April Benched Orchids Results Les Nesbitt 63 Kris Kopicki April Benched Orchids Photos Judy & Greg Sara 64 Other Positions Membership Liaison Officer Life Members Robert Lawrence Mr R Hargreaves† Mr G Carne Mrs T Bridle Ph: 8294 8014 Email:[email protected] Mr H Goldsack† Mr R Bates Botanical Advisor Mr R Robjohns† Mr R Shooter Bob Bates Mr J Simmons† Mr W Dear Conservation Officer Mr D Wells† Mrs C Houston Thelma Bridle Ph: 8384 4174 Mr L Nesbitt Mr D Hirst Field Trips Coordinator Michael Clark Patron: Mr L.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Connections to Natural Waterways Rouse Hill Development Area
    Stormwater connections to natural waterways Rouse Hill Development Area Overview What This guide explains what you need to do when building a stormwater connection into Sydney Water’s natural open channel waterways in the Rouse Hill Development Area (RHDA). We allow stormwater connections that ensure: stable transition from a constructed drainage system to the natural waterway sustainable water quality management restoration of vegetation following construction. Who This guide applies to owners and developers proposing to build a stormwater pipe connecting to a waterway owned or managed by Sydney Water in the RHDA. This applies to connection proposals for residential, commercial, industrial and other government agencies (e.g. Roads and Maritime Services) developments. Why Construction of stormwater connections to natural waterways affects the waterway and the riparian corridor. This guide ensures that owners and developers design and construct stormwater connections to a safe and sustainable standard by: minimising the number of uncontrolled stormwater discharges ensuring new stormwater connections cause minimal environmental impact to the waterway and its water quality restoring and maintaining disturbed waterfront and riparian vegetation following construction activities. Document current at 31 July 2014 Page 1 Sydney Water – Stormwater connections to natural waterways – Rouse Hill Development Area Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Approval requirements 3 Connecting to any waterway 3 Connecting to a Sydney Water waterway 3 3. Stormwater connection design 4 Point of connection 4 Drainage system 4 Outlet headwall 5 Asset ownership 6 4. Land and vegetation restoration 7 5. Submission requirements 9 6. Design drawings 10 Headwall setback from creek channel – montage 10 Headwall setback from creek channel – plan 11 Headwall setback from creek channel – elevation 12 Headwall setback from creek channel – section 13 Soil horizons – montage 14 Appropriate revegetation – plan and section elevation 15 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park
    Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park Hiltaba Pastoral Lease and Gawler Ranges National Park, South Australia Survey conducted: 12 to 22 Nov 2012 Report submitted: 22 May 2013 P.J. Lang, J. Kellermann, G.H. Bell & H.B. Cross with contributions from C.J. Brodie, H.P. Vonow & M. Waycott SA Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources Vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes Bush Blitz – Flora Survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges NP, November 2012 Report submitted to Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study: 22 May 2013. Published online on http://data.environment.sa.gov.au/: 25 Nov. 2016. ISBN 978-1-922027-49-8 (pdf) © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resouces, South Australia, 2013. With the exception of the Piping Shrike emblem, images, and other material or devices protected by a trademark and subject to review by the Government of South Australia at all times, this report is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. All other rights are reserved. This report should be cited as: Lang, P.J.1, Kellermann, J.1, 2, Bell, G.H.1 & Cross, H.B.1, 2, 3 (2013). Flora survey on Hiltaba Station and Gawler Ranges National Park: vascular plants, macrofungi, lichens, and bryophytes. Report for Bush Blitz, Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South Australia: Adelaide). Authors’ addresses: 1State Herbarium of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (DEWNR), GPO Box 1047, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Austin Land System Unit Landform Soil Vegetation Area (%) 1
    Pages 186-237 2/12/08 11:26 AM Page 195 Austin land system Unit Landform Soil Vegetation area (%) 1. 5% Low ridges and rises – low ridges of Shallow red earths and Scattered (10-20% PFC) shrublands outcropping granite, quartz or greenstone shallow duplex soils on or woodlands usually dominated by and low rises, up to 800 m long and granite or greenstone Acacia aneura (mulga) (SIMS). 2-25 m high, and short footslopes with (4b, 5c, 7a, 7b). abundant mantles of cobbles and pebbles. 2. 80% Saline stony plains – gently undulating Shallow duplex soils on Very scattered to scattered (2.5- plains extending up to 3 km, commonly greenstone (7b). 20% PFC) Maireana spp. low with mantles of abundant to very abundant shrublands (SBMS), Maireana quartz or ironstone pebbles. species include M. pyramidata (sago bush), M. glomerifolia (ball- leaf bluebush), M. georgei (George’s bluebush) and M. triptera (three- winged bluebush). 3. 10% Stony plains – gently undulating plains Shallow red earths on Very scattered to scattered (2.5- within or above unit 2; quartz and granite granite (5c). 20% PFC) low shrublands (SGRS). pebble mantles and occasional granite outcrop. 4. <1% Drainage foci – small discrete Red clays of variable depth Moderately close to close (20-50% (10-50 m in diameter) depositional zones, on hardpan or parent rock PFC) acacia woodland or tall occurring sparsely within units 2 and 5. (9a, 9b). shrubland; dominant species are A. aneura and A. tetragonophylla (curara) (GRMU). 5. 5% Drainage lines – very gently inclined Deep red earths (6a). Very scattered (2.5-10% PFC) A linear drainage tracts, mostly unchannelled aneura low woodland or tall but occasionally incised with rills, gutters shrubland (HPMS) or scattered and shallow gullies; variable mantles of Maireana spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens
    Bulletin of The Desert Legume Program of The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum and The University of Arizona Volume 18, Number 2 August 2006 Legumes of Wallace Desert Gardens Pamela Slate standing relationship between our Desert Gardens reviews and Botanic Coordinator organizations, one I see growing ever approves appropriate on-site Wallace Desert Gardens stronger year after year.” projects of mutual benefit. Wallace Desert Gardens is a Matthew B. Johnson non-profit foundation [(502(c)(3) In the mid-1980’s, the Program Manager and Curator under IRS rules] that was created in Wallace’s moved, complete with their Desert Legume Program 1993, well after much of the garden plant collection, from a Paradise was established. Its mission was Valley acre to a Scottsdale The virtues of desert legumes written by HB, as he was fondly subdivision where they purchased captured the attention of H.B. and known, to reflect the original intent of numerous acre-plus lots. At the time, Jocelyn M. Wallace when they first the foundation: HB had “no idea it would be bigger learned of the Desert Legume than a two-acre garden.” Although Program (DELEP) in 1989, about a Wallace Desert Gardens is a he “knew nothing of desert plants year after the program was founded collection of the world’s deserts when he moved to Arizona” in the at the University of Arizona. They plants located at an elevation of early 1980’s, they quickly became his understood the importance of some 2400 feet. Founded by passion. Today the garden legumes’ potential applications H.B.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Plant Species List of Plant Species
    List of plant species List of Plant Species Contents Amendment history .......................................................................................................................... 2 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Application ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Relationship with planning scheme ..................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Aim ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Who should use this manual? ............................................................................................. 3 2 Special consideration ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Variations ......................................................................................................................................... 4 4 Relationship ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Appendix A – Explanatory notes & definitions .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]