DOCSLIB.ORG

2.5G.(8A) – 2.5G.(8B) Action Item

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2.5G.(8A) – 2.5G.(8B) Action Item State of California California State Transportation Agency DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Tab 48 M e m o r a n d u m To: CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS CTC Meeting: January 30-31, 2019 CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISION Reference No.: 2.5g.(8a) – 2.5g.(8b) Action Item From: STEVEN KECK Prepared by: Ron Sheppard, Chief (Acting) Chief Financial Officer Division of Rail and Mass Transportation Subject: FINANCIAL ALLOCATION AMENDMENTS FOR PROPOSITION 1B INTERCITY RAIL IMPROVEMENTS FUND PROGRAM PROJECTS ISSUE: Should the California Transportation Commission (Commission) approve the California Department of Transportation (Department) request to de-allocate savings of $617,000 in Proposition 1B – Intercity Rail (ICR) funds from the two projects listed below, due to cost savings at the completion of each project? RECOMMENDATION: The Department recommends that the Commission approve its request to de-allocate a total of $617,000 in Proposition 1B – ICR funding from the two projects listed below, due to cost savings at the completion of each project as follows: Current Revised District Amending Cost ICR Project Resolution Project Allocation - PPNO Resolution Savings Allocation Amount Raymer to Bernson Double Track: PS&E Design and 75-2098 ICR1B-AA-1819-02 ICR1B-A-1314-02 $6,500,000 $419,000 $6,081,000 engineering for double track from MP 453.1 to MP 446.8 on Ventura subdivision. Van Nuys North Platform: PS&E Design and 75-2113 ICR1B-AA-1819-01 ICR1B-A-1314-01 $4,000,000 $198,000 $3,802,000 engineering for second platform at the Van Nuys station. Total Savings $617,000 “Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economy and livability” CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS January 30-31, 2019 CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Reference No.: 2.5g.(8a) -2.5g.(8b) Page 2 of 2 BACKGROUND: The Proposition 1B – ICR program projects listed above have been completed and have cost savings. The implementing agencies for these projects are now requesting that the Commission reduce the currently approved Proposition 1B – ICR allocations, by the amount of cost savings, for each project. The proposed changes are reflected in strikethrough and bold in accordance with the attached revised vote boxes. FINANCIAL RESOLUTION: Be it Resolved, that the Proposition 1B – ICR funds currently allocated for each project is hereby amended by its cost savings, in accordance with the attached revised vote boxes. Attachments “Provide a safe, sustainable, integrated and efficient transportation system to enhance California’s economy and livability” CTC Financial Vote List January 30-31, 2019 2.5 Highway Financial Matters PPNO Project # Program/Year Allocation Amount Phase Budget Year Recipient Project Title Prgm’d Amount Item # RTPA/CTC Location Project ID Fund Type Amount by District-County Project Description Adv. Phase Program Code Fund Type 2.5g.(8a) Proposition 1B – Intercity Rail – State -Administered Rail Projects Resolution ICR1B-AA-1819-01 Amending Resolution ICR1B-A-1314-01 1 $4,000,000 Van Nuys North Platform Project PS&E 75-2113 2013-14 $3,802,000 The project will complete final design of a north platform at ICR / 13-14 304-6059 $4,000,000 the Van Nuys Amtrak station. Once constructed, this will add PS&E PTMISEA $3,802,000 Department of platform access to accommodate simultaneous bidirectional $4,000,000 30.20.090.000 Transportation passenger rail service at the Van Nuys Amtrak Station. A $3,802,000 LACMTA pedestrian underpass will also be constructed to provide 0012000136 75-Los Angeles safe passage to the platform. S (CEQA – SE; Section 21080 (b)(10): 7/9/13) (NEPA – CE; 6/24/13) (Concurrent programming amendment under Resolution ICR1B-P-1819-03) Outcome/Output: The project will replace the existing single sided platform with a new center platform to better serve and enhance safety for passengers and improve flow of Amtrak and Metrolink trains. Amend Resolution ICR1B-A-1314-01 to deallocate $198,000 of Proposition 1B ICR in PS&E to reflect cost savings at project closeout. CTC Financial Vote List January 30-31, 2019 2.5 Highway Financial Matters PPNO Project # Program/Year Allocation Amount Phase Budget Year Recipient Project Title Prgm’d Amount Item # RTPA/CTC Location Project ID Fund Type Amount by District-County Project Description Adv. Phase Program Code Fund Type 2.5g.(8b) Proposition 1B – Intercity Rail – State -Administered Rail Projects Resolution ICR1B-AA-1819-02 Amending Resolution ICR1B-A-1314-02 1 $6,500,000 Raymer to Bernson Double Track Project PS&E. 75-2098 2013-14 $6,081,000 On the Ventura County Line between Control Point (CP) ICR / 13-14 304-6059 $6,500,000 Raymer (MP 453.1) and CP Bernson (MP 446.8) on through PS&E PTMISEA $6,081,000 Department of to Northridge Station. Construct 39,000 linear feet of second $6,500,000 30.20.090.000 Transportation main line; main line track relocation, relay rail and drainage $6,081,000 LACMTA improvements; four No. 20 turnouts, four bridges and work 0012000130 75-Los Angeles on the Northridge Station platform. S (CEQA – SE; Section 15275, 7/22/13) (NEPA – CE; 1/14/14) (Concurrent programming amendment under Resolution ICR1B-P-1819-03) Outcome/Output: Completion of the construction project would add track capacity, improve travel times for Amtrak Pacific Surfliner Intercity passenger rail service, and operational on-time performance along the corridor. Amend Resolution ICR1B-A-1314-02 to deallocate $419,000 of Proposition 1B ICR in PS&E to reflect cost savings at project closeout. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Master HSIPR Selection Sheet 030413 Updates.Xlsx
    FRA High‐Speed Intercity Passenger Rail (HSIPR) Program Updated 3/4/2013 Funding Selection Summary (Sorted by State Abbreviation, Funding Source, and Project Type) Funding Potential Estimated State Project Type Project Name Project Summary Source Funding* Alabama ‐ Total Funding Amount: $200,000 AL FY 2009 Planning Project New Passenger Rail Service in Alabama Completion of a feasibility study to restore intercity passenger rail service from Birmingham to Montgomery to Mobile, AL.$ 200,000 Amtrak ‐ Total Funding Amount: $449,944,000 This project will boost capacity, reliability, and speed in one of the most heavily used sections of the Northeast Corridor (NEC). The project will create a 24 mile segment of track between New Brunswick and Trenton, NJ capable of 160 mph train operations with high‐tension catenary, upgraded electric Amtrak ARRA Corridor Program NEC Power, Signal, Track, Catenary Improvements power facilities, and high‐speed rail interlockings that allow express trains to overtake and pass local trains, reducing delays that often affect this track $ 449,944,000 section. In addition, this project makes related track and interlocking investments between Trenton, NJ and Morrisville, PA and at New York Penn Station. The upgraded power facilities will reduce power failures, which are frequently experienced on this segment of the NEC. California ‐ Total Funding Amount: $4,243,143,231 This project encompasses the purchase of 15 passenger rail cars and 4 locomotives for use on the Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol Corridors in California. These new cars and locomotives will be compliant with standards for equipment that can travel at speeds up to 125 mph established Next Generation Passenger Rail Equipment CA ‐ DOT ARRA Corridor Program pursuant to Section 305 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Orange Line
    Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida CCOOVVEERR PPHHOTOOTO LLooss AAnnggeelleess CCoouunnttyy MMeettrrooppololiittanan TTransransppoorrttaattioionn AAuutthhoorriittyy DDIISCSCLLAAIIMMEERR TThhiis ds dooccuumemennt it is is inntteennddeed ad as a ts teecchhnniiccaal al assssiissttaanncce pe prroodduucctt. I. It it is dsiiss ssdeemmiinnaatteed udnn ddueer tr thhe sepp oosnnssoorrsshhiip opf tf tohhe Ue..SS U.. DDeeppaarrttmemennt ot of Tf Trraannssppoorrttaattiioon in in tn thhe ie inntteerreesst ot of if innffoorrmamattiioon enxxcc ehhaannggee. T. Thhe Uenn iittUeed Sdttaa Sttees Gsoo vvGeerrnnmemennt atss ssauumemes nso nlo liiaabbiilliittyy ffoor ir itts cs coonntteenntts os or ur usse te thheerreeooff. T. Thhe Ue Unniitteed Sd Sttaattees Gs Goovveerrnnmemennt dtoo eeds nsoo tn et ennddoorrsse perroo pdduucctts osf mfo aa nnmuuffaaccttuurreerrss. T. Trraadde oerr o mamannuuffaaccttuurreerrss’ n’ naamemes as appppeeaar her herreeiin sn soolleelly by beeccaauusse te thheey ayrre a ceoo nncssiiddeerreed edssss eeennttiiaal tl to tohh et oebb jjeeoccttiivve oef tf tohhiis rs reeppoorrtt.. Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 7650 Van Nuys Blvd Van Nuys, CA 91405
    7650 Van Nuys Blvd Van Nuys, CA 91405 Exclusively Listed by: Kelly Morgan | 310.836.3638 [email protected] CalDRE 01898026 1 7650 Van Nuys Blvd Van Nuys, CA 91405 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT All materials and information received or derived from Kelly Morgan Commercial Kelly Morgan Commercial Group makes no warranties and/or representations Group, its directors, officers, agents, advisors, affiliates and/or any third party sources regarding the veracity, completeness, or relevance of any financial data or assumptions. are provided without representation or warranty as to completeness , veracity, or Kelly Morgan Commercial Group does not serve as a financial advisor to any party accuracy, condition of the property, compliance or lack of compliance with applicable regarding any proposed transaction. All data and assumptions regarding financial governmental requirements, developability or suitability, financial performance of the performance, including that used for financial modeling purposes, may differ from property, projected financial performance of the property for any party’s intended use actual data or performance. or any and all other matters. Any estimates of market rents and/or projected rents that may be provided to a party Neither Kelly Morgan Commercial Group, its directors, officers, agents, advisors, or do not necessarily mean that rents can be established at or increased to that level. affiliates makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to accuracy or Parties must evaluate any applicable contractual and governmental limitations as well completeness of the any materials or information provided, derived, or received. as market conditions, vacancy factors and other issues in order to determine rents Materials and information from any source, whether written or verbal, that may be from or for the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles City Clerk
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM j!; 23 PM 3: 26 OFFICI:ft CITY ADMINWR ATIVE Date: July 22, 2014 To: Honorable Eric Garcetti, Mayor Attention: Mandy Morales, Legislative Coordinator From: Jon Kirk Mukri, General Manager Department of Transportation Subject: RECOMMENDED CONTRACT A A BS FOR THE CONTINUED MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR LADOT BIKE PATH AND TRANSIT FACILITIES SUMMARY The Department of Transportation (LADOT) requests authority to execute contracts with ShelterClean Services, Inc. (incumbent) for the continued provision of management and landscaping / maintenance services for LADOT bike path and transit facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Council, subject to the approval of the Mayor: 1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Transportation, to enter into a five-year contract with ShelterClean Services, Inc., for the management and performance of maintenance and landscaping services for eleven (11) City bike path facilities, with a total cost not-to-exceed $3,000,000, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality. 2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Department of Transportation, to enter into a five-year contract with ShelterClean Services, Inc., for the management and performance of maintenance and landscaping services for seven (7) City transit facilities, with a total cost not-to-exceed $2,140,000, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality. DISCUSSION As will be discussed in this section, the request for proposals(RFP) Evaluation Committee ranked the combined Economy of Scale proposal submitted by ShelterClean Services, Inc. as the best and most cost-effective for the City.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2015
    metro.net Metro Orange Line Connections h s a W h s a a Hansen Dam n DEVONSHIRE ST DEVONSHIRE ST DEVONSHIRE ST 5 a W s u r S Chatsworth Station u a lb t i ARLETA AVG Metro Rapid Stop n 405 W W O a Chatsworth Station L S O D METROLINK GLENOAKS BL O E LAUREL CYN BL D Metro Rapid Line TOPANGA CYN BL CYN TOPANGA TOPANGA CYN BL CYN TOPANGA N M LASSEN ST LASSEN ST LASSEN ST A N S Metro Orange Line T SAN FERNANDO RD CHATSWORTH A A T Station VA V E TAMPA AV TAMPA Sepulveda Metro Orange Line CORBIN AV ZELZAH AV F WILBUR AV RESEDA BL RESEDA PLUMMER ST PLUMMER ST PLUMMER BL BALBOA ST PLUMMER ST ARLETA W DE SOTO AV DE SOTO WOODLEY AV WOODLEY Y WINNETKA AV SEPULVEDA BL SEPULVEDA Metro Rail Station VINCENNES ST TERRA BELLA ST Northridge East CanyonARLETA Channel AV SUN AMTRAK/METROLINK 27 Fashion CSUN NORTH HILLS VALLEY Metro Red Line Center NORTHRIDGE NORDHOFF ST AV DARBY NORDHOFF ST NORDHOFF ST OSBORNE ST Transfers SAN DIEGO FWY Nordhoff Station Metrolink h SHELDON ST NORDHOFF ST Northridge Station s a PANORAMA W Amtrak 5 Bull Creek BRANFORD ST PARTHENIA ST PARTHENIA ST PARTHENIA ST CITY Parking a 15-0989 ©2014 LACMTA m H WEST HILLS i o CHASE ST O DEC 2014 Subject to Change c L a L P ROSCOE BL Roscoe Station ROSCOE BL ROSCOE BL Y W TUXFORD ST O O Sun Valley Station METROLINK D Aliso Canyon Wash Aliso Canyon SAN FERNANDO RD STRATHERN ST STRATHERN ST F STRATHERN ST W Y DE SOTO AV DE SOTO Van Nuys Station Tujunga Wash FlyAway WHITSETT AV Bus Terminal NUYS BL VAN WHITE OAK AV WHITE OAK TAMPA AV TAMPA VARIEL AV VARIEL WOODLAKE AV WOODLAKE WOODLAKE AV
    [Show full text]
  • June 2008 Metrolink Matters
    METROLINK NEWS & EVENTS • JUNE 2008 (800) 371-LINK • www.metroLINKtraINs.com Metrolink Ticket Vending Machines Now Sell Amtrak Tickets In case you haven’t noticed, Metrolink TVMs now have the ability to sell Amtrak tickets. This is the result of a partnership between Metrolink, Amtrak, and Caltrans to fund and install this capability on TVMs throughout the Metrolink system and at Amtrak stations from San Diego to San Luis Obispo. Installations are complete at all stations,* and the TVMs have a new “Buy Tickets Here” sign as well. Now, passengers have a new level of convenience to purchase both an Amtrak and a Metrolink ticket to complete a trip that uses both services. Just use the Metrolink/Amtrak TVM now available at all Metrolink stations and at most Amtrak Pacific Surfliner stations.* * Installation at the Carpinteria and San Clemente Pier stations and Amtrak 10-trip-ticket availability will take place at a later date. (continued on page 3) Metrolink and Amtrak passengers can also continue to enjoy the benefits of the Rail 2 Rail program. Metrolink monthly-pass holders still travel for free on any Amtrak Pacific Surfliner trains or buses within the origin-and-destination pair of their passes, including on weekends. Amtrak Pacific Surfliner ticket holders can also ride any Metrolink train within the limits of their tickets at no additional charge. All Metrolink and Amtrak tickets continue to be valid on either service between Bob Hope Airport in Burbank and L.A. Union Station as Construction & Maintenance Update long as those two stations are within the trip limits of the ticket being used.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Number: 9
    Los Angeles County Metro Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Board Report Los Angeles, CA File #:2016-0284, File Type:Motion / Motion Agenda Number:9. Response REVISED PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING COMMITTEE OCTOBER 19, 2016 SUBJECT: BURBANK-GLENDALE-LOS ANGELES CORRIDOR ACTION: AUTHORIZE STUDIES RECOMMENDATION AUTHORIZE the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to: A. CONDUCT a study for providing up to two additional Metrolink stations in the City of Glendale and up to two additional stations in the City of Los Angeles as well as providing increased Metrolink train service throughout the day from Union Station to the City of Burbank with opportunities to include expanded service to the Antelope Valley as a first step in examining increased rail connectivity in the Los Angeles, Glendale and Burbank Corridor. Additional stations would need to be spaced appropriately and limited so as not to severely affect travel time for those travelling beyond Burbank to the outer terminus of the lines in Ventura and the Antelope Valley; B. PROGRAM AND AMEND the FY 17 budget to add $900,000 in Measure R Commuter Rail service funds to conduct this study; and C. INVENTORY the options for increasing the City of Glendale’s access to the Regional Transit System given the existing baseline Metrolink and future High Speed Rail service. This inventory will examine the existing infrastructure, planned and funded projects and potential future initiatives to improve connectivity to the greater Metro system. ISSUE At the March 24, 2016 Board meeting, the Board directed the CEO to look at creating a new Metrolink station at Rio Hondo College on the Riverside Line and relocating the Northridge Station on the Ventura County Line.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2019-20 Proposed Budget
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 PROPOSED BUDGET Including Forecast for FY2020-21 thru FY2023-24 For Board Consideration & Public Comment Final Adopted Budget will be available 60 days after Board Adoption Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission San Bernardino County Transportation Authority Ventura County Transportation Commission June 28, 2019 1 This page intentionally left blank June 28, 2019 2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY FY2019-20 BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: Executive Summary ....................................................................... 11 1.1 A Message from the Chief Executive Officer – To be added ............ 11 1.2 Introduction – To be added .............................................................. 11 1.3 Metrolink in Perspective – To be added ........................................... 11 1.4 Metrolink in Comparison – To be added .......................................... 11 1.5 Accomplishments in FY2018-19 – To be added ............................... 11 1.6 Objectives for FY2019-20 ................................................................ 11 1.7 FY2019-20 Budget in Brief ............................................................... 12 1.8 Key FY2019-20Budget Information .................................................. 12 1.9 The FY2019-20 Operational Budget Statistics ................................. 13 1.10 Administrative Requirements ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Line Transit Neighborhood Plans Community Workshop & Initial Concepts: Summary of Comments November and December 2017
    ORANGE LINE TRANSIT NEIGHBORHOOD PLANS COMMUNITY WORKSHOP & INITIAL CONCEPTS: SUMMARY OF COMMENTS NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2017 Executive Summary The Orange Line Transit Neighborhood Plans (TNP) project aims to develop land use, zoning, and design regulations for the neighborhoods surrounding five Metro Orange Line stations in the south San Fernando Valley: North Hollywood, Van Nuys, Sepulveda, Reseda, and Sherman Way. The study area generally includes the corridors and some residential areas within a 15-minute walk or ½-mile radius of each station. During the first phase of the public planning process, in the first half of 2016, the Los Angeles Department of City Planning hosted four community workshops to identify opportunities to enhance neighborhoods surrounding transit stations, as well as several other small focus groups with specific stakeholder groups. Staff gathered input from the general public, including community residents, business owners, employees, transit users, and other participants about their thoughts, ideas, and concerns for the future of their neighborhood as it develops around transit, summarized here. Using the comments received through the first phase of outreach, in combination with station area context, existing City plans and policies, demographic analysis, and planning best practices, staff developed initial land use and zoning concepts for targeted changes in development rights and design regulations. These initial concepts were presented at two community workshops, on November 2, 2017 from 6-8:30 p.m.at the San Fernando Valley Arts & Cultural Center in Tarzana, and on November 15, 2017 from 6-8:30 p.m. at Van Nuys City Hall. Following these meetings, materials were made available online and staff solicited additional comments through the end of December.
    [Show full text]
  • SCRRA Strategic Assessment
    SCRRA Strategic Assessment Southern California Regional Rail Authority January 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ES Page 1 1.0 Study Purpose and Methodology 1.1 1.1 Purpose 1.1 1.2 Methodology 1.1 1.2.1 The Current Metrolink System and the Surrounding Environment 1.1 1.2.2 Definition of Future Operating Scenarios 1.2 1.2.3 Identification of Long- Term Direction 1.4 1.2.4 Challenges 1.4 2.0 Current System and Baseline Capacity 2.1 2.1 Formation of Metrolink 2.1 2.2 Current Operations 2.2 2.3 Person Throughput on Metrolink Compared with Freeways 2.4 2.4 Organizational Summary 2.5 2.5 Mission Statement and Management Philosophy 2.5 2.6 The SCRRA Budget 2.7 2.7 SCRRA Operating Formulae 2.7 2.8 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats, and Unknown Outcomes 2.9 2.9 Constraints on System Growth 2.10 3.0 Metrolink System Safety Program 3.1 3.1 System Safety Program Plan 3.1 3.2 Sealed Corridor Concept 3.2 3.3 Grade Separations 3.5 3.4 Crash Energy Management 3.5 4.0 Public Communications 4.1 4.1 Methods for Determining Customer Communications Needs 4.1 4.1.1 Onboard Surveys 4.1 4.1.2 Rider Panel 4.1 4.1.3 Focus Groups 4.1 4.1.4 Customer Comments 4.1 4.1.5 Industry-wide Research Studies 4.2 4.1.6 Stakeholder Communications 4.2 4.2 Preferences and Expectations for Transit Information 4.2 4.2.1 Printed Materials 4.2 4.2.2 Call Center 4.3 4.2.3 Website 4.3 4.2.4 Station Signage 4.5 a) Static Signage 4.5 b) Dynamic Signage 4.6 4.2.5 In-vehicle information 4.7 4.2.6 Media Relations 4.7 4.3 Short Term Communications Outlook (2006-2015)
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Orange Line Weekday Peak Hours Only Metro Orange Line
    Monday through Friday Schedule Chatsworth - Warner Center Shuttle Effective Jun 29 2014 Metro Orange Line Weekday Peak Hours Only Metro Orange Line Eastbound (Approximate Times) Westbound (Approximate Times) Eastbound (Approximate Times) Westbound (Approximate Times) CHATSWORTH CANOGA PARK WARNER CENTER WARNER CENTER CANOGA PARK CHATSWORTH Chatsworth Station Canoga Station Warner Center Station Warner Center Station Canoga Station Chatsworth Station 5:35A 5:48A 5:53A 6:00A 6:05A 6:18A CHATSWORTH WARNER CENTER PARK CANOGA WINNETKA NUYS VAN NORTH HOLLYWOOD NORTH HOLLYWOOD GLEN VALLEY NUYS VAN TARZANA PARK CANOGA WARNER CENTER CHATSWORTH 6:05 6:18 6:23 6:30 6:35 6:48 6:29 6:42 6:47 6:48 6:53 7:06 6:54 7:07 7:12 7:13 7:18 7:31 7:12 7:25 7:30 7:31 7:36 7:49 7:44 7:57 8:02 8:03 8:08 8:21 7:56 8:09 8:14 8:16 8:21 8:34 A B 8:39 8:52 8:57 9:02 9:07 9:20 8:55 9:08 9:13 9:15 9:20 9:33 SHUTTLE TRIPS DO NOT OPERATE MIDDAY SHUTTLE TRIPS DO NOT OPERATE MIDDAY Chatsworth Station Warner Center Station Canoga Station College Pierce Station Balboa Station Nuys Van Station North Hollywood Station North Hollywood Station College Valley Station Sepulveda Station Reseda Station Canoga Station Warner Center Station Chatsworth Station 2:00P 2:14P 2:19P 2:25P 2:30P 2:43P ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRIPS SHOWN IN CHATSWORTH TO WARNER CENTER ADDITIONAL PEAK HOUR TRIPS SHOWN IN CHATSWORTH TO WARNER CENTER 2:52 3:06 3:11 3:14 3:19 3:32 3:19 3:33 3:38 3:54 3:59 4:12 SHUTTLE SECTION OF THIS TIMETABLE SHUTTLE SECTION OF THIS TIMETABLE 3:42 3:56 4:01 4:06 4:11 4:24 — 3:41A 3:46A
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PASSENGER RAIL SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL REPORT DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 2 REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 2 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 3 ANALYTICAL APPROACH 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 STRATEGIES 27 NEXT STEPS 44 CONCLUSION 45 TECHNICAL REPORT PASSENGER RAIL DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT connectsocal.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM This Connect SoCal Passenger Rail report lays out a vision of passenger rail services for the SCAG Region for the next three decades. It demonstrates Passenger Rail the progress that has been made over the last two decades in terms of growing ridership, new rail services, capital improvements and new funding opportunities. It demonstrates the regional importance and significance of passenger rail in the SCAG region, and why growing rail services by increasing frequencies in underserved corridors, as well as establishing service in unserved markets, is crucial to the future mobility and sustainability of our region. The report highlights recent success in establishing new funding opportunities for passenger rail, including the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP) and Senate Bill (SB) 1. Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner intercity rail service is benefiting from these new funding opportunities as well as recent institutional arrangements that establish local control for the service. The Southern California Regional Rail Authority’s (SCRRA) Southern California Optimized Rail Expansion (SCORE) program is an ambitious
    [Show full text]