DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 206/Thursday, October

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register/Vol. 67, No. 206/Thursday, October 65408 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 206 / Thursday, October 24, 2002 / Notices involved that are identified as historic, impose historic preservation conditions III. Comments unless it obtains evidence that there only to the extent that the particular SEA specifically invites comments would be no adverse effect, and both property is owned by the railroad from consulting parties and members of ACHP and the SHPO agree with the seeking abandonment (either full the public on the following: Board that abandonment of the Enola ownership in fee or a long-term interest 1. Identification of additional Branch would adversely affect historic in the property) and the property has a consulting parties; sites and structures. sufficient nexus to the proposal under 2. Any need for further assessment of review. When the Board imposes D. Mitigation Phase adverse effects on the line; historical preservation conditions on 3. Appropriate mitigation measures In order to develop appropriate particular property, the Board cannot (including comments on the measures mitigation, SEA requests additional force the applicant to sell or donate its specified in the earlier MOA and information from all consulting parties property, or impose a restrictive suggestions for additional or alternative regarding the physical condition of the covenant upon the deed. Essentially, measures, as well as information Enola Branch. After the court issued its documentation of the historic resources regarding the current condition of the decision in FAST, SEA requested a (taking photographs or preparing a rail line); description of the current condition of history) before they are altered or 4. Methods or outlets for publicizing the rail line from Norfolk Southern removed is the only form of a proposed MOA; and Corporation (NS), which acquired the nonconsensual mitigation the Board can 7 5. Any other pertinent issues relevant Enola Branch from Conrail in 1998. NS require. Although the Board has limited to this proceeding. submitted a letter stating that the road authority to protect historic properties, bed and embankments of the rail line if the consulting parties agree to Decided: October 15, 2002. are still intact, though there is undertake additional mitigation beyond By the Board, Victoria Rutson, Chief, substantial overgrowth in the area. what the Board may require (such as Section of Environmental Analysis. While NS indicated that the Enola preservation of a resource), such Vernon A. Williams, Branch has been subject to periodic consensual mitigation can be Secretary. inspections for right-of-way clean up incorporated in the MOA. [FR Doc. 02–27111 Filed 10–23–02; 8:45 am] and Amtrak’s maintenance of certain As stated above, in the 1990’s a BILLING CODE 4915–00–P power lines, NS stated that there has proposed MOA was developed for the been no comprehensive inspection of Enola Branch that would have provided the rail line and associated structures in for photographic documentation of all of DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY the last 10 years. the historic bridges to Pennsylvania’s The Enola Branch originally included state standards, and the development of Fiscal Service 83 bridges, prior to Conrail’s application a public, interpretative display, in the for abandonment. In its letter, NS stated form of a 6–8 minute video, outlining Financial Management Service; that approximately 65 grade-separated the history of the Enola Branch. SEA Proposed Collection of Information: structures on the line remain in place specifically requests comments on Minority Bank Deposit Program and are in different states of usability. whether the provisions of this Certification Form for Admission According to NS, the Pennsylvania previously developed MOA proposal AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Public Utility Commission has served would constitute appropriate mitigation Fiscal Service, Treasury. orders for removal, conveyance to local at this time and, if not, suggestions for ACTION: Notice and request for municipalities, or assumption of additional or alternative mitigation comments. maintenance responsibilities by the measures. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, E. Formulation of an MOA SUMMARY: The Financial Management regarding bridge structures on the rail Service, as part of its continuing effort line. Based on public comment in response to reduce paperwork and respondent As the ICC explained in its decision to this Notice and other input that SEA burden, invites the general public and adopting the rules that continue to receives from the SHPO, ACHP, the other Federal agencies to take this govern the Board’s implementation of railroad and others, SEA expects over opportunity to comment on a 8 the NHPA, the agency’s ability to the next several months to develop, in continuing information collection. By protect historic properties is very conjunction with the consulting parties, this notice, the Financial Management limited. The Board cannot deny appropriate measures to avoid, Service solicits comments concerning authority for a railroad to take an action minimize, or mitigate adverse effects on form FMS 3144 ‘‘Minority Bank Deposit that would otherwise meet the relevant the historic properties identified in this Certification Form for Admission.’’ statutory criteria solely on the ground case. After such mitigation measures DATES: Written comments should be that it would adversely affect historic have been determined, SEA will received on or before December 23, resources. Moreover, with respect to rail incorporate the proposed mitigation into 2002. line abandonments, the Board can an MOA and then circulate, and—as required under the law—seek public ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 7 On June 23, 1997, NS and CSX Transportation comment on the MOA. SEA requests to Financial Management Service, 3700 Inc. sought permission from the Board to acquire comments on how it can best publicize East West Highway, Records and Conrail and to divide its assets between them. On Information Management Staff, Room July 23, 1998, the Board approved the Conrail the proposed MOA. Once an MOA is Acquisition. CSX Corp., et al. & Norfolk Southern signed, the NHPA review in this case 135, Hyattsville, Maryland 20782. Corp., et al.—Control and Operation Leases/ will be complete in accordance with the Agreements—Conrail Inc., et al., STB Finance NHPA and the court’s decision, and the multiple steps simultaneously where appropriate, Docket No. 33388 (decision No. 89) (STB served as long as the consulting parties and the public July 23, 1998). The Pennsylvania Rail Lines LLC, a section 106 condition imposed in this 9 have an adequate opportunity to express their views subsidiary of Conrail, now owns the Enola Branch case can be removed. and the SHPO (and Tribal Historic Preservation and leases it to NS. Officer(s), when involved) agree that it is 8 See Implementation of Environmental Laws, 7 9 Agency officials and consulting parties can appropriate. See FAST, 252 F.3d at 252; 36 CFR I.C.C.2d 807, 828–29 (1991). expedite the section 106 process by addressing 800.3(g). VerDate 0ct<09>2002 16:23 Oct 23, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\24OCN1.SGM 24OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 206 / Thursday, October 24, 2002 / Notices 65409 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Requests for additional information or copies of the form(s) and instructions Fiscal Service Internal Revenue Service should be directed to Martha Thomas- [FI–27–89; FI–61–91] Mitchell, Risk Management Division, Surety Companies Acceptable on 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC Federal Bonds: Termination—Oriska Proposed Collection; Comment 20227, (202) 874–6757. Insurance Company Request for Regulation Project SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant AGENCY: Financial Management Service, AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Treasury. (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), the Financial Fiscal Service, Department of the ACTION: Management Service solicits comments Treasury. Notice and request for comments. on the collection of information ACTION: Notice. described below. SUMMARY: The Department of the Title: Minority Bank Deposit Program SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 2 to Treasury, as part of its continuing effort Certification Form for Admission. the Treasury Department Circular 570; to reduce paperwork and respondent OMB Number: 1510–0048. 2002 Revision, published July 1, 2002 at burden, invites the general public and Form Number: FMS 3144. 67 FR 44294. other Federal agencies to take this Abstract: This form is used by opportunity to comment on proposed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: financial institutions to apply for and/or continuing information participation in Minority Bank Deposit Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874–6507. collections, as required by the Program. Institutions approved for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub. acceptance in the program are entitled hereby given that the Certificate of L. 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). to special assistance and guidance from Authority issued by the Treasury to the Currently, the IRS is soliciting Federal agencies, State and local above named Company, under the comments concerning an existing final governments, and private sector United States Code, Title 31, Sections regulation, FI–27–89 (TD 8366), Real organizations. 9304–9308, to qualify as an acceptable Estate Mortgage Conduits; Reporting Requirements and Other Administrative Current Actions: Extension
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 71.9 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department 10-88 Bomb Threat 10-16
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Rail B
    FREIGHT RAIL B Pennsylvania has 57 freight railroads covering 5127 miles across the state, ranking it 4th largest rail network by mileage in the U.S. By 2035, 246 million tons of freight is expected to pass through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, an increase of 22 percent over 2007 levels. Pennsylvania’s railroad freight demand continues to exceed current infrastructure. Railroad traffic is steadily returning to near- World War II levels, before highways were built to facilitate widespread movement of goods by truck. Rail projects that could be undertaken to address the Commonwealth’s infrastructure needs total more than $280 million. Annual state-of-good-repair track and bridge expenditures for all railroad classes within the Commonwealth are projected to be approximately $560 million. Class I railroads which are the largest railroad companies are poised to cover their own financial needs, while smaller railroads are not affluent enough and some need assistance to continue service to rural areas of the state. BACKGROUND A number of benefits result from using rail freight to move goods throughout the U.S. particularly on longer routes: congestion mitigation, air quality improvement, enhancement of transportation safety, reduction of truck traffic on highways, and economic development. Railroads also remain the safest and most cost efficient mode for transporting hazardous materials, coal, industrial raw materials, and large quantities of goods. Since the mid-1800s, rail transportation has been the centerpiece of industrial production and energy movement. Specifically, in light of the events of September 11, 2001 and from a national security point of view, railroads are one of the best ways to produce a more secure system for transportation of dangerous or hazardous products.
    [Show full text]
  • RAIL (FREIGHT) B 2006 Report Card for Pennsylvania’S Infrastructure
    RAIL (FREIGHT) B 2006 Report Card for Pennsylvania’s Infrastructure In 1998, 919 million tons of freight passed through the Commonwealth. In 2020, that value is expected to be 1,397 million tons. Railroad freight demand is growing at a much faster rate than the general population, and railroad traffic is steadily approaching World War II levels. Projects that could be undertaken to address the Commonwealth’s infrastructure needs total some $280 million. Annual state of good repair track and bridge expenditures for all railroad classes within the state are projected to be approximately $560 million. Class I and larger railroads are more poised to cover their own financial needs. Smaller railroads are not as fortunate and need the most assistance to remain competitive. BACKGROUND A number of benefits result from supporting rail freight: congestion mitigation, air quality improvement, improving transportation safety, curtailing truck traffic growth on highways, job growth and economic development. Railroads also remain the safest and most viable mode for transporting hazardous materials, coal, industrial raw materials and large quantities of goods. Since the mid-1800’s, rail transportation has been the centerpiece of industrial production and energy generation. Specifically, in light of September 11th and from a national security point of view, railroads are one of most secure options for transporting dangerous or hazardous products. In fact, the majority of spent nuclear fuel rods will likely be sent via rail to the newly established federal depository. Surely, many of these shipments will pass through the Keystone State. By further improving the rail infrastructure, railroad operation can become even safer and more difficult to disrupt by any terrorist group.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Northeast Corridor Agreement
    RECEIPT OF AGREEMENT This is to certify that I have received the Amtrak/Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees (NEC) Agreement, effective May 19, 1976, updated March 1, 1999. _____________________________ (Employee Signature) _____________________________ (Date) _____________________________ (Occupation) _____________________________ (Location) AGREEMENT Entered Into By and Between THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) NORTHEAST CORRIDOR And Its Employees Represented By THE BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES Note: It is understood that this reprinting is a synthesis in one document of the provisions of the current labor agreement. This is intended as a guide. It is not a separate agreement between the parties. If any dispute arises as to the proper interpretation or application of any rules, the terms of the actual negotiated labor agreement shall govern. (Synthesis printed April, 1999) BMWE-NEC INDEX SCOPE AND WORK CLASSIFICATIONS.................................................................................11 Scope...................................................................................................................................... 11 Exception................................................................................................................................. 12 Work Classification Rule ........................................................................................................... 20 Bridge And Building And Track Departments ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland County History
    Cumberland County History Summer 1993 Volume 10 Number 1 Editor Contributions Solicited Dr. Robett G. Crist The editor invites the submission of articles or notes on the history of Board of Directors Cumberland County and on its peo­ ple. Such writing can investigate new Karen Best areas of research or may reflect past Tom H. Bietsch scholarship. Manuscripts should con­ Dr. William Cornell form to Kate Turabian's Manual for Richard W. Dutrey Writers, 5th edition. Running copy, as Tita Eberly, Secretaty well as citations, should be typed and James D. Flower, Sr. doubled spaced. Notes may be gath­ Ann Kramer Hoffer, President ered together and will be placed at Jon F. LaFaver the end of the article. Press times are David Maclvor, Treasurer 15 April . and 15 November. Please Fred D. Oyler send manuscripts to 1915 Walnut Merri Lou Schaumann, Vice President Street. Camp Hill 17011. Andrea Sheya Wells Shoemaker Paul L. Strickler Col. Ralph T Tiemo Publications Committee Dr. William Cornell Membership and Subscription Dr. Robert G. Crist Cumberland County History is James D. Flower, Jr. published semi-annually. All Dr. Warren ). Gates members of the Cumberland County Judge Kevin A. Hess Historical Society receive a copy of Jon F. LaFaver, Chairman the journal as part of regular Ann Kramer Hoffer membership. The regular member­ Mary Rosenbaum ship fee ls $25.00 annually. Members Merri Lou Schaumann receive other benefits, including a Charles Thompson quarterly newsletter, special invitations to programs and exhibits, and the satisfaction of joining with others to preserve county history. Correspondence regarding member­ ship should be addressed to the Executive Director, Cumberland Countv Historical Society, 21 North Pitt Street, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak
    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 88.5 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA (and Trenton Station) C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department
    [Show full text]
  • Property Type
    The Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office’s Researchers Guide for Documenting and Evaluating Railroads Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 – 2 Property Type ................................................................................................................ 3 - 6 Description (Narrative, Mapping and Photography) .................................................. 7 - 8 Significance, History and Context Development ...................................................... 9 - 15 Integrity ...................................................................................................................... 17 - 19 Additional Avenues of Significance .......................................................................... 20 - 22 Glossary of Terms ...................................................................................................... 23 - 27 Appendix I - Naming Standardization Guide ................................................................. 28 Appendix 2 – Aggregate Files .................................................................................... 29-30 INTRODUCTION Railroads in Pennsylvania peaked at 11,693 miles of roadway in 1920, and Pennsylvania was generally considered to be the top third most railroad mileage state in the United States. Today, approximately 35% of all freight commerce in the nation still passes through Pennsylvania, consisting of approximately 5,500 miles of
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania Railroad
    The Pennsylvania Railroad THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD.. Spec. act of PA, April 12, 1846 Trackage, June 30, 1918: 2902.556 mi. First main track 1856.208 mi. Second main track 2928.284 mi. Yard track and sidings Equipment Steam locomotives 3,770 Extra tenders 128 Snowplows and flangers 116 Electric locomotives 68 Trailer cars 1 Freight cars 148,062 Passenger cars 3,853 Motor equipment of cars 183 Floating equipment 339 Work equipment 3,103 Miscellaneous equipment 221 Equipment leased from Goodman Car & Manufacturing Company: Work equipment 32 The Pennsylvania Railroad controls and operates the following companies: Company: Percent of control: Belvidere Delaware "majority" Connecting Railway "majority" Delaware River Railroad "majority" Harrison and East Newark “majority” Northern Central "majority" The Pennsylvania Railroad controls and operates the following companies except as noted: Company: Percent of control: Pennsylvania and Atlantic "majority" The portion from Pemberton to Hightstown, NJ is operated by The Union Transportation Co. Western New York and Pennsylvania Railway "majority" The portion from Mahoningtown to Stoneboro, PA, including a branch line from Leesburg to Redmond, PA The Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington Railroad "majority" The portion from Gray's Ferry to Eddystone, PA, operated by the Philadelphia and Reading Ry The Pennsylvania Railroad controls the following companies: Operated by their own organizations: Company: Percent of control: Cumberland Valley Rail Road "majority" Erie and Western Transportation Company
    [Show full text]
  • Freight Rail
    FREIGHTRAIL RAIL FREIGHT RAIL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pennsylvania’s 64 freight railroads operate on 5,604 miles of track across the state, ranking it the fifth largest rail network by mileage in the U.S. By 2035, 246 million tons of freight is expected to pass through the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, an increase of 22% over 2007 levels. Pennsylvania’s railroad freight demand continues to exceed current infrastructure. Improvements such as double stacking or parallel tracks and larger transfer facilities would help improve capacity. Despite competing interests , the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation’s Freight Rail Bureau has continued to procure impressive levels of freight infrastructure funding, which directly or indirectly supports multi modal transportation projects throughout the Commonwealth. This public funding is in addition to all private support committed. It has further produced the most comprehensive state rail plan to date, with a strong emphasis on understanding stakeholders and their needs. 2018 REPORT CARD FOR PENNSYLVANIA’S INFRASTRUCTURE—PAGE 42 BACKGROUND Since the mid-1800s, rail transportation has been a key transportation mode supporting industrial production and energy movement. Higher utilization of rail provides congestion mitigation benefits, air quality improvement, and enhancement of transportation safety, as a result of reducing truck traffic on highways. Pennsylvania has the 5th largest rail system in the United States and is one of the nation’s leaders in freight assessment, planning, and investment spurring from the Commonwealth’s industrial heritage. Today, most railroads are privately owned. The state network is made up of approximately 5,604 route-miles of freight railroad operated (Figure 1), and sixty-four freight railroads, more than any other state.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Passenger Rail Service to Berks County, PA
    Restoring Passenger Rail Service to Berks County, PA PREPARED FOR: Berks Alliance & Greater Reading Chamber Alliance PREPARED BY: Transportation Economics & Management Systems, Inc. July 2020 Restoring Passenger Rail Service to Berks County, PA Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS II CHAPTER 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.2 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE 1-4 1.3 PROJECT SCOPE 1-4 1.4 PROJECT METHODOLOGY 1-5 1.5 FREIGHT RAILROAD PRINCIPLES 1-7 1.6 ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT 1-9 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND FOR THE STUDY 2-1 2.1 HISTORY OF RAIL PASSENGER SERVICES IN READING 2-1 2.2 REVIEW OF PREVIOUS CORRIDOR STUDIES 2-1 CHAPTER 3 SERVICE AND OPERATING PLAN 3-1 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1 3.2 TRAIN TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS 3-3 3.3 PASSENGER TRAIN TIMETABLE DEVELOPMENT 3-7 3.4 RAIL CAPACITY NEEDS 3-17 3.5 SUMMARY 3-45 CHAPTER 4 CAPITAL PLAN 4-1 4.1 INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS 4-1 4.2 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULING AND CAPITAL COST 4-1 4.3 NORFOLK SOUTHERN COMPENSATION 4-1 4.4 EQUIPMENT AND TOTAL CAPITAL COST 4-1 CHAPTER 5 DEMOGRAPHICS, SOCIOECONOMIC AND TRANSPORTATION DATABASES 5-1 5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1 5.2 ZONE SYSTEM 5-1 5.3 SOCIOECONOMIC DATABASE DEVELOPMENT 5-2 5.4 BASE YEAR TRANSPORTATION DATABASE DEVELOPMENT 5-4 CHAPTER 6 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECAST 6-1 6.1 FUTURE TRAVEL MARKET STRATEGIES 6-1 6.2 TRAVEL DEMAND FORECAST RESULTS 6-4 6.3 MARKET SHARES 6-10 6.4 BENCHMARKS 6-11 CHAPTER 7 OPERATING COSTS 7-1 TEMS, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • PHMC/BHP Researcher's Guide to Historic Railroads
    The Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office’s Researchers Guide for Documenting and Evaluating Railroads October 16, 2015 Final Version Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 – 2 Property Type ............................................................................................................... 3 – 6 Documenting Contributing Resources to Historic Districts ............................................. 7 Description (Narrative, Mapping and Photography) .................................................. 8 - 9 Significance, History and Context Development ..................................................... 10 - 16 Integrity ...................................................................................................................... 17 - 19 Additional Avenues of Significance .......................................................................... 20 - 22 Glossary of Terms ...................................................................................................... 23 - 27 Appendix I - Naming Standardization Guide ................................................................. 28 Appendix 2 – Aggregate Files .................................................................................... 29-30 INTRODUCTION Railroads in Pennsylvania peaked at 11,693 miles of roadway in 1920, and Pennsylvania was generally considered to be the top third most railroad mileage state in the United States. Today,
    [Show full text]
  • Windsor St Guide
    CONRAIL NCR Line Windsor Street Yard and Environs Harrisburg Division Eastern Region DEDICATED TO SAFETY Buffalo Line To Buffalo & Erie Pittsburgh Line To Altoona Harrisburg Line To Reading Enola (Harrisburg) Lemoyne New Cumberland Marsh Run Lurgan Line To Hagerstown Middletown Ferry Keystone Corridor To Philadelphia Goldsboro Cly York Haven Wago Jct Wago Mount Wolf Emigsville Myers Mill Ewing York Industrial Yo r k Maryland & Pennsylvania Grantley Brillhart Spring Grove Glatfelter Frederick Secondary Smyser Hanover Jct. Seltzville Larue Hanover Glen Rock Seitzland Maryland Shrewsbury Midland Stewartstown RR New Freedom Summit Grove Freeland Box Tree Bentley Springs Walker Parkton Graystone White Hall Blue Mount Monkton Corbett Glencoe Sparks Phoenix Ashland Cockeysville Te x a s Padonia Timonium Lutherville Riderwood Ruxton Lake Roland Northeast Corridor To Philadelphia Mt. Washington Melvale Woodberry Mt. Vernon Baltimore Bayview Yard (Baltimore) CONRAIL’s NCR Line Northeast Corridor To Washington DC History Of The Northern Central The Northern Central Railway was originally built to give the city of Baltimore a competing Rail Line to the Baltimore and Ohio. It grew in importance through the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It carried passengers and freight north from Baltimore to meet up with the Pennsylvania’s main line to the Ohio River Valley. Early on, the Pennsylvania Railroad bought a controlling interest in the road and took over operations. The southern end (from Baltimore to Parkton MD) carried a large number of commuters in the early 20th century until the 30s when busses and automobiles took over much of this traffic. The line still carried high priority trains for Baltimore until the 50s when it started to really decline.
    [Show full text]