<<

Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Cocoa pod borer threatening the sustainable coconut-cocoa cropping system in Papua New Guinea

S. P. Singh¹ and P. Rethinam¹

Abstract

Cocoa pod borer cramerella Snellen is an important pest of cocoa. Its recent invasion of cocoa in Papua New Guinea is threatening the sustainable coconut-cocoa cropping system. C. cramerella occurs only in South-East Asia and the western Pacific. It has been the single most important limiting factor to cocoa production in , and the . C. cramerella attacks cocoa, ; , lappaceum; , Cola acuminate; , Nephelium mutabile; kasai, Albizia retusa, nam-nam, cauliflora; litchi (Litchi chinensis); (Dimocarpus longan) and taun, . The possible mode of its spread is through seed pods/fruits carried from previously infested regions. However, there is possibility of local adaptations of rambutan-feeders or nam-nam-feeders to cocoa.

Females lay their eggs (50-100) on the surface of the unripe pods (more than five cm in length), which hatch in about 3-7 days and the emerging larvae tunnel their way to the center of the pod where they feed for about 14-18 days before chewing their way out of the pod to pupate. The pupal stage lasts 6- 8 days. The larval feeding results in pods that may ripen prematurely, with small, flat beans, often stuck together in a mass of dried mucilage. The beans from seriously infested pods are completely unusable and in heavy infestation over half the potential crop can be lost.

Over four dozen species of natural enemies (parasitoids, predators, and entomopathogens) attack eggs, larvae, pupae and adults of C. cramerella. Egg parasitoids Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata and T. cojuangcoi, egg-larval parasitoid Chelonus chailini, predatory ants particularly Iridomyrmex spp., Dolichoderus thoracicus and Anoplolepis spp. are commonly recorded.

The most effective control methods are frequent harvesting, destruction of ripe pods and husks to prevent pupation in the field and selective spraying of resting sites with deltamethrin or cypermethrin or carbaryl. Pheromone mixtures have potential for use in traps as a quarantine surveillance technique and for control. Encouragement of predatory ants and parasitoids, and use of egg parasitoid T. bactrae fumata are potential biological control techniques. Pod sleeving with bags have been able to control cocoa pod borer in smallholders garden but not in larger plantations. Some of the clones have shown resistance against the cocoa pod borer.

Success achieved in the project-Sustainable Cocoa Extension Services for Smallholders (SUCCESS) implemented in Indonesia in conjunction with the American Cocoa Research Institute and BCCCA, a British counterpart, ACDI/VOCA could be emulated for C. cramerella management, which included training of farmers to adopt frequent harvesting, pruning, sanitation and fertilization.

Key words: Coconut, cocoa, cocoa pod borer, , rampasan & harvesting, natural enemies, biological control, pheromone trapping, management.

1 Asian Pacific Coconut Community, Jakarta, Indonesia

76 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Introduction Cocoa pod borer (CPB)Conopomorpha (=Acrocercops = Gracillaria = Zarathra) Coconut palm known as ‘Tree of Life' cramerella Snellen (: and cocoa tree belonging to the genus ) is known by several other Theobroma, meaning 'food of the Gods' in common names such as cocoa pod borer, Greek are essentially crops of small farmers. cocoa , rambutan borer, nam-nam In Papua New Guinea (PNG) coconut-cocoa borer, javanese cocoa moth, polilla javanesa is a popular cropping system, cocoa grown del cacao (Spanish), teigne javanaise du as companion crop in coconut under the cacaoyer (French) Motte, Javanische Kakao shade. Copra and cocoa are major export (Germany), and hama penggerek buah kakao commodities. Recently Dr. S. P. Singh (Bahasa- Indonesia) (CABI,2002). Project Coordinator IPM, Asian Pacific Coconut Community visited Cocoa and C. oceania, C. sinensis and C. litchiella Coconut Institute, Tavelo and National are three congeneric species found in South- Agricultural Research Institute (NARI), East Asia which are very similar to C. Keravat, Papua New Guinea (PNG). He met cramerella. They can be differentiated from Dr. John Moxon, Team Leader, NARI and C. cramerella by wing pattern and male and visited fields around these two Institutes. Dr. female genitalia (Bradley, 1986). Moxon informed about the severe incidence of cocoa pod borer in some of the blocks Strains belonging to NARI. The incidence varies from one to hundred per cent in different C. cramerella was collected from cocoa blocks. The pest was detected for the first and in the field at four sites in time in March 2006. The staff of NARI is Malaysia in 1984 and analysed by making vigorous efforts to eradicate the polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. pest. It may be mentioned here that in PNG Hexokinase was polymorphic at one site and and several other countries combination of fluorescent esterase at all four sites. Two coconuts with cocoa is common farming zones of malate dehydrogenase (MDH) were system. But this system is now threatened by observed: c-MDH was monomorphic in all the advent of cocoa pod borer four populations while MDH-1 was (Conopomorpha cramerella Snellen) in polymorphic in three populations (Tan et al., PNG. The work conducted on C. cramerella 1988). Peptidase 2 was polymorphic in the was reviewed earlier (Lim et al., 1987a,b; Sabah sample while alpha-GPDH [glycerol- Ooi et al., 1987). This article provides some 3-phosphate dehydrogenase] was basic information on C. cremerella coupled polymorphic in the other sample. This with its management options. Bibliography differentiation may reflect geographical is also provided. variation of the same species (Saahlan et al.,

1985). Although 30 enzymes and general and nomenclature proteins were successfully demonstrated on zymograms, none could be used as The earliest damage caused by cocoa diagnostic markers to separate the two pod bore was noted by Jansen (1860), which biotypes (Muhamad et al., 1989). was first taxonomically described at the beginning of the 20th century as Host Acrocercops cramerella (Snellen, 1904). Subsequently the generic placement of this Indigenous sapindaceous and species has been revised to Conopomorpha leguminous species (rambutan, pulasan, cramerella (Bradley, 1985), which is now kasai and nam-nam) appears to be the widely accepted. original hosts of C. cramerella as they are indigenous to the region to which the moth

77 Cord 2006, 22 (1) is restricted, whereas cocoa is a recently cocoa expansion in the late 1980's and early introduced species(CABI, 2002) and the pest 1990's.Approximately 20% of all cocoa in appears to have shifted to this perennial Indonesia could be infected by C. host. Rambutan and nam-nam produce fruits cramerella. In May 1998 Landell-Mills with pulp similar to cocoa (Wood, 1980). estimated the reduction in cocoa production However, they tend to be more seasonal than potential by cocoa pod borer in Southeast cocoa and so may not provide the right Asia at 40,000 tonnes. The estimated losses conditions for permanent establishment. in dollars due to cocoa pod borer This could limit populations in local areas approached $20m in 1998. The cocoa pod (CABI, 2002). borer has been the single most important limiting factor in cocoa production in C. cramerella infests cocoa, Theobroma Indonesia. Cocoa pod borer infestation has cacao; rambutan, Nephelium lappaceum; severely affected the quantity and quality of cola, Cola acuminate; pulasan, Nephelium cocoa production and farmer income. The mutabile; kasai, Albizia retusa, nam- cocoa pod borer is prevalent in all producing nam,; litchi (Litchi areas, and is causing an income loss of chinensis); longan (Dimocarpus longan) and approximately 40% to individual farmers, or taun, Pometia pinnata. over $400 per hectare per year. With limited control, production losses in infested areas are significant (between 20% - 50%) for Damage smallholders (with average farm size of 1.5

ha) who rely on the year-round cash income The larvae of C. cramerella bore into provided by cocoa. For Sulawesi alone, the soft tissues in the pod wall, which estimated losses caused by cocoa pod borer provide the nutrients for the development of are approximately US$150 million per year, the beans. Once inside it is safe from almost all to smallholder cocoa farmers. In insecticides for most parts of its life. The light infestations the loss may be slight, but attacked pods ripen prematurely, and control efforts may be needed to prevent produce small, flat beans. In heavy higher infestation from developing. infestations, the beans are often stuck together by mucus and in this condition; they have no market value. In heavy Pest status and damage identification infestation over half the potential crop can be lost. C. cramerella has become the most important pest of cocoa in many parts When <60% of harvested cocoa pods of its distribution.Quarantine and showed internal attack, yield loss was <5%, surveillance for C. cramerella remains a but with 90% of pods attacked yield loss problem in areas of South-East Asia in was about 40%. In Sabah, Malaysia, annual which the pod borer does not presently yield losses ranged from 22 to 54%. Losses affect cocoa ( and ). for the whole estate were estimated from Rambutan or nam-nam borers are already estate records, and for the same years ranged known from Thailand, Sri Lanka and New from 42 to 49% (Day, 1989).The number of Britain (Papua New Guinea). C. cramerella hardened beans and the number of beans in has also been found from unspecified hosts, the pod were the most vital contributing in Western and the Northern parameters accounting for more than 80% of Territory of early in the 20th the variation about the mean in the observed century (Mumford, 1986). Live borers can bean loss (Davis, 1989b). travel long distances within rambutan fruit: healthy C. cramerella pupae were found on Numerous outbreaks of C. cramerella Thai rambutans in a supermarket at Riyadh, have occurred in Indonesia following the in 1986 (CABI, 2002).

78 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

approximately 300,000 cocoa farmers, so Inspection methods are usually based on also in Bali and Papua. assessing pods for larval damage. Exit holes or larval debris on the pods are a clear It is possible that a cocoa form of C. indication of the presence of the pest. Within cramerella was introduced into Sabah, East a crop, uneven or premature ripening of Malaysia during the post-1977 'cocoa boom', pods, recognised by a yellowing of the with pods brought from Indonesia or the surface, is also a good indication of internal Philippines. A similar introduction from a feeding activity by the larvae. previously infested area may have occurred in Malacca and Negeri Sembilan in West Once pods are opened, characteristic Malaysia prior to the discovery of C. tunnels caused by larvae and their presence cramerella in those states in 1986. However, within such tracts is confirmatory evidence in both cases it is also possible that there of the pest's presence. Extensive feeding were local adaptations of rambutan-feeders within the pod commonly leads to individual or nam-nam-feeders to cocoa (CABI, 2002). beans sticking together, which often means that bean extraction from the pod is difficult. The infestation in Sabah spread rapidly Pupae can be found on the pods or on from Tawau (south-east Sabah) across the litter and this is often a primary source of entire state during a 3-year period (Tay, pest infestation. 1987), and it soon spread to Sarawak. C. cramerella was found infesting cocoa pods for the first time in two plantations in Distribution Sarawak, Malaysia, in 1983-84 (Kueh et al.,

1985).The initial infestations discovered in C. cramerella occurs only in South-East West Malaysia were contained for several Asia and the western Pacific, and its origin years, thanks to vigorous quarantine efforts within this area has been the subject of based on experience from east Malaysia speculation since the turn of the century (Chin, 1987; Ling et al., 1987). (Mumford, 1986). Cocoa is not the original Unfortunately scattered outbreaks began to host, since it has been introduced into the appear in other parts of West Malaysia region to which the moth is restricted. during the first half of 1988 and it was not

possible to extend this vigorous containment C.cramerella is a major pest of cocoa in and eradication effort to a wider area (CABI, Indonesia (Wardojo, 1980a).After the 2002). appearance of cocoa pod borer at Manado in the 1840's the cocoa industry in North The spread of C. cramerella northwards Sulawesi declined rapidly (Toxopeus and in Peninsular Malaysia is described, Gieserger, 1983). The industry began to following the arrival of the pest in major move elsewhere, to the Philippines and to cocoa growing areas of Kuala Selangor and Java. Long distance movement of the cocoa Hilir Perak. The pest is now widespread in pod borer must almost certainly have taken cocoa-growing areas with the exception of place through the movement of infested those in Terengganu and Kelatan. The mode pods, as there is no indication that can of dispersal of the pest is considered as man- fly long distances. In about 1880 cocoa was assisted dispersal, it is suggested that a small introduced into Central Java on a plantation number of migrating adults move to a new scale to replace coffee (van Hall, 19i9). area and reproduce, forming an 'epicentre'.

Their offspring are spread by air currents to I n 1992, cocoa pod borer reemerged in the surrounding region. In a survey in an Sulawesi in Toli Toli (Central Sulawesi). 'epicentre' area, on average of 90% cocoa Currently it has a spread all over Sulawesi, pods were infested (Zam and Azhar, 1992). present on almost 100% of the farms of

79 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

In Asia it is distributed in through or tunnels along the surface of the Darussalam, , (China), sclerotic layer for up to several centimeters Indonesia (Bali, Papua, Java, Kalimantan, before penetrating the husk. Once inside the Maluku, Sulawesi and Sumatra), , pod, tunnelling becomes less directional, the Malaysia (Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and inner surface of husks, pulp of beans and Sarawak), Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Sri placentae being randomly tunnelled into and Lanka and Thailand. Its earlier records from fed upon. In younger pods, early-instar Oceania, Australian Northern Territory, larvae could penetrate the testa of Papua New Guinea and Samoa from other developing beans, and in some cases hosts never mentioned it as a serious pest of cotyledons could be attacked. Such feeding cocoa (CIE, 1984; CABI, 2002). causes scarification and subsequent sticking of the beans. Damage to the funicles of pods Biography often results in beans being malformed and under-sized, significantly reducing quality The small brown adult moth with bright and thus the value of the processed beans. yellow patches at the tips of the forewings is Feeding in pods also causes them to yellow about 7 mm in length with a wingspan of or ripen unevenly and prematurely, about 12 mm. The moths have very long confusing ripeness standards for harvesting antennae which are swept backwards in their (CABI, 2002). natural resting position (CABI, 2002). The entire larval stage takes 14-18 days The moths are most active at night. A to complete, with 4-6 instars. Late-instar female can normally produce 50-100 eggs in larvae are about 10 mm long and creamy her lifetime. During the day, adult moths coloured while still inside the pod, but normally rest underneath horizontally greenish after they emerge from the pod. inclined branches of the cocoa tree, and their The larvae tunnel out through the pod wall cryptic coloration blending with the resting to pupate, leaving an easily identifiable exit place makes them very difficult to spot. hole (CABI, 2002). Adult longevity is 1-30 days, but adults generally live for about a week (CABI, Pupae lie beneath a light-brown 2002). waterproof silken membrane tightly drawn over a depression on a pod surface or leaf. The female may lay eggs anywhere on Once outside the pod, larvae crawl or lower the surface of host- pods more than 5 themselves by a silk thread to a suitable site cm in length although there appears to be for pupation. The pupation site could be in a some preference for primary or secondary furrow of the pod, or green dried and furrows of pods. Eggs are yellow-orange, other debris. Once at this site the larvae spin flattened and just visible to the naked eye oval-shaped cocoons and enter a short (0.5 x 0.2 mm). Rectangular indentations prepupal stage before forming obtect pupae. cover the surface of the egg. On hatching, The pupal stage normally takes 6-8 days to eggs become translucent, the shell being complete. It is also at this stage that the pest whitish but darkened by faeces within is most likely to be transported by man to (CABI, 2002). other cocoa-growing areas through movement of pods/fruits, leaves and other First-instar larvae are translucent white objects to which pupae are attached. in colour and about 1 mm long. On hatching, Unnoticed transport of rumbutan with pupae the first-instar larva tunnels through the is the example of record of this pest in Saudi floor of the egg shell and bores Arabia. In total, the entire life cycle takes perpendicular to the pod surface until it one month to complete. reaches the sclerotic layer of the husk. At this point the larva either tunnels directly

80 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

The adult moth is small, well attached to leaves or ground litter, including camouflaged and difficult to locate in the discarded wrappings. The mean duration of farm, thus making them difficult to control the egg, larval and pupal stages were 3.3, 8.8 with chemical or bio control agents. and 7 days, respectively. The longevity of the adult was approximately 6-8 days. The In the laboratory in Sabah, Malaysia, difference in the abdominal tip or labial palp the egg, larval and pupal periods averaged of adults was used to distinguish the two 3.28, 17.64 and 6.68 days, respectively, and sexes. The sex ratio of male and female was there were estimated to be 4 larval instars. 1:1(Hwang and Hsieh, 1989). The life-span of adults averaged 4.5 days in the laboratory, but under field conditions it Semisynthetic diet averaged 3.21 days for males and 5.14 days for females. The sex ratio (males to females) A semisynthetic diet for C. cramerella was 1:1.2 in the laboratory and 2:1 in the was developed in order to test the toxicity of field. The preoviposition period averaged experimental compounds to larvae (Furtek et 2.96 and the oviposition period 2.72 days, al., 2001) as well as to multiply host specific and the number of eggs laid averaged 61.00. parasitoids. The mean hatch was 69.64% in the Sampling technique laboratory and 95.12% under field conditions. The eggs were laid singly, A sampling scheme called the stratified mainly in the furrows of the middle and top systematic technique was developed which of the cacao pod, and up to 35 eggs were stratifies a cocoa field into 6 strata and found on a pod (Lim et al., 1982). systematically samples the centre of 6 trees

of each stratum. This approach gave more The eggs showed logarithmic representative results than random sampling distributions with mean densities ranging (Davis, 1989a). from 0.75 to 3.338 eggs per pod. Iwao's

Mean Crowding Index and Taylor's Power Field Monitoring/Economic Threshold Law indicated consistent positive Levels relationships between mean and variance of number of eggs per pod and their parameters In preliminary studies aimed at finding were used to develop a sequential sampling an economic threshold of infestation, below scheme which should be useful for cocoa 50% infestation gave less than 5% yield loss growers (Azhar and Long, 1991). and no detectable reduction in bean size.

Losses increased rapidly when infestation C. cramerella is an important pest of exceeded 60%, and at 80-90% infestation litchi (Litchi chinensis) and longan yield losses could exceed 30% and bean size (Dimocarpus longan) trees in Taiwan could be reduced by 10% (Day, 1983a,b; (Hwang and Hsieh, 1989).C. cramerella was 1989). active in litchi and longan orchards during the fruit developing season (April to Damage function for C. cramerella September) (Hwang and Hsieh, relating the loss of yield to percentage 1989).Studies on the biology of C. infestation in harvested pods was studied cramerella collected from this ecosystem (Day,1985). The function indicated almost revealed that the mean number of eggs no loss with infestations up to approximately deposited by females was 114.1 and the rate 60%, and rapidly increasing losses with of egg hatchability was 97%. Shortly after higher infestations (over half the crop lost in hatching, larvae bore into the fruit to feed on very heavy infestations). While this is a the seed or fruit pulp, which caused the fruit reasonably practical way of estimating to drop. When fully grown, larvae left the damage, the relationship is inevitably feeding site to pupate in a flat cocoon

81 Cord 2006, 22 (1) inaccurate at higher infestation levels. Low effort into even better routine harvesting and infestations (20-40%) consist of a small maintenance may obviate the need for the proportion of pods each with only one larva census (CABI, 2002). inside, whereas high infestations (80-100%) could have many pods with 2, 3 or up to 30 An important problem with census larvae inside. Percentage infestation does systems is, understanding the significance of not give a good measure of the actual the results from individual census rounds. C. number of larvae in the pods at high cramerella losses result from a combination percentages, while it does at low of numbers of larvae and numbers of pods at percentages. However, for setting priorities an attractive, susceptible stage of maturity for control action this is probably adequate: (the last 6-8 weeks before ripeness, as a infestations high enough to be in the general rule). The infestation in a cohort of inaccurate area would certainly need control mature pods reflects C. cramerella attack anyway, while at lower infestations when over one and half to two generations of there is more doubt about the immediate moths, it is not a point sample. Furthermore, need for control, the function appears to be a 50% infestation one month after the peak reasonably accurate (CABI, 2002). will surely rise over the next 2 months, causing higher proportional damage but on a An absolute measure of C. cramerella falling crop, while a 50% infestation 6 damage can only be obtained by comparing weeks before a peak will almost certainly the yields over an entire cropping period, fall, as pod numbers are likely to increase looking at the overall tonnage produced and faster than C. cramerella populations in especially at the dry bean kg/harvested pod normal crop cycles. Therefore, the ratio, which shows the proportion of interpretation of any single census figure discarded pods and beans across the (percentage infestation) depends on a cropping period. It is important to look at prediction of the numbers of pods reaching the whole cropping period because losses for maturity over the following 3 months. This the season are made up of a mix of high means that in addition to the fairly simple proportional losses on the low crop and task of monitoring percentage infestations, lower proportional losses in the high crop the pod-age structure should also be (CABI, 2002). monitored, which is not as easy (CABI, 2002). Many estates have tried to develop C. cramerella census systems to estimate losses Pheromone traps provide another and to plan control programmes. The most possible form of monitoring, but they only common form has been to establish a grid of provide a relative measure of populations, as marked sample trees or rows in each block the range of attraction is unknown and which are monitored regularly for variable. The problem of two races of C. infestation (clean, infested and very highly cramerella greatly reduces the value of infested pods are recorded). Control, usually pheromone traps for estimating numbers of pod or branch spraying, would then be moths, as it is not clear whether both types applied to blocks either over a preset are equally attracted, nor whether other threshold or up to a predetermined number races remain undetected. Pheromone traps of blocks in priority set by the census results may, however, be useful for quarantine (for instance, the worst 20%). Estates with detection in uninfested areas (CABI, 2002). census systems almost always obtained better control than those without, but an Natural enemies and biological control estate manager who can organise a good census plan is also likely to be harvesting In Sabah, Malaysia, two pupal more frequently and spraying well- parasitoids, one egg parasitoid and 22 maintained trees. Putting some of the census

82 Cord 2006, 22 (1) species of predators are reported (Lim et al., actually due to the small 'sugar' ants, 1982). Iridomyrmex spp., which are much more difficult to augment or manipulate (Day, Over 20 parasitoids have been listed 1985). Ant predation was almost constant at from Malaysia, the Philippines and Sri around 40% of pupae each month Lanka (Ooi et al., 1987).The egg parasitoids throughout a 4-year period (Day, 1985). included Trichogrammatoidea bactrae Predation levels were independent of fumata and T. cojuangcoi; larval and pupal C. cramerella pupal density, as would be parasitoids recorded included Apanteles sp., expected from generalist predators. Bracon sp., Ceraphron aguinaldoi, Chelonus chailini, Chrysonotomyia, In Malaysia, Dolichoderus thoracicus in Elasmus sp., Goryphus fasciatipennis, G. managed and dense canopies of cocoa trees javanicus, G. mesoxanthus, Nesolynx was present in 6.0 and 6.4%, respectively, thymus, Ooencyrtus ooii, Paraphylax sp., D. thoracicus was observed to be associated Paraphylax fasciatipennis, Pediobius soror, with Cataenococcus hispidus and Ebhul Phanerotoma sp., Photoptera erythronota varium, and it is suggested that the numbers and Tetrastichus sp. The pathogens recorded of the formicid may be dependent on the included - Beauveria bassiana, numbers of these Hemiptera present (Azhar, Paecilomyces fumosoroseus and 1992). Paecilomyces lilacinus. Entomophilic nematode Steinernema sp. has also been Cocoa is commonly grown under partial recorded. shade provided by coconut palms and others. Coconut palms clearly favour the Ooencyrtus ooii sp. nov., an encyrtid black cocoa ant. Where the ant is well prepupal parasitoid of C. cramerella, is established, active trails can be seen running described from Malaysia, may be of some between the cocoa trees and the crowns of importance in the natural control of this pest coconut palms, even those more than 18 m of cocoa in Malaysia (Noyes, 1991). tall. More importantly, the coconut palm is an excellent source of shelter for the ant. Two species of parasitoids, The coconut palm has huge leaves or fronds, Phanerotoma sp. and Apanteles sp., were and each leaf consists of many leaflets. identified from pupae of C. cramerella. Two Aggregations of D.thoracicus can be found other parasitoids Tetrastichus sp. and under some of these leaflets. When a leaf Elasmus sp. were reared from C. cramerella becomes old and drops from the palm, the larvae (Hwang and Hsieh, 1989). drying leaflets form long tubes; D.thoracicus loves to nest in these tubes. Natural parasitism is detected at Strong colonies of D.thoracicus can be significant levels only at the peak-crop found nesting in the cocoa leaf litter if the period when C. cramerella numbers are layer is thick. highest. The knowledge that D. thoracicus likes The most studied natural enemies are to nest in the coconut leaflet tubes and cocoa predatory ant Dolichoderus thoracicus and leaf litter, has been used to construct egg parasitoidTrichogrammatoidea bactrae artificial nests for manipulating the ant. fumata (refer Bibliography). Artificial nests are made either by stuffing cocoa leaf litter into polythene bags or by Natural mortality from predation in the tying coconut leaflets into bundles. Placed in field appears to be greatest from general an area where D. thoracicus activity is high, predators of pupae; in particular the artificial nests are quickly colonized. A Iridomyrmex spp. Normal predation levels colonization rate of more than 90% within a are in the range 40-60%. Most predation was month is normal. The colonized artificial

83 Cord 2006, 22 (1) nests can then be collected and introduced possible that natural enemies were partially into the area desired. Uncolonized artificial responsible for keeping the populations at nests are also used to aid ant establishment low levels. and to supplement natural nesting sites when Searches for parasites were extended by they are lacking. IIBC's Malaysian research station to Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Many queens are present in a nest Papua New Guinea, and two wasp species (polygyny). In some species of ants a colony (Ceraphron and Ooencyrtus) were consists of several nests, one of which introduced in the field in small numbers to contains the queen; in others, a single queen Sabah, while a third species (Nesolynx) is present in a nest. Since the queen is the failed to establish in field cages. None of only individual in a colony which is capable these has established successfully; general of reproduction, when harvesting nests, the predation was cited as a possible explanation polygynous habit makes it very unlikely that for the failure of these introductions (CABI, a nest would be without at least a queen. The 2002). black cocoa ant readily colonizes suitable nesting sites. The use of the egg parasitoid, Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata, for the In Malaysia it was determined that the control of the cocoa pod borer (Bong et al., cost of establishing and maintaining the 1999) in Malaysia since 1983 showed that it black cocoa ant for 30 months over an area is an effective bioagent for the management of 7 ha was US$ 22 per ha per year. The cost of C. cramerella. Large-scale mass of insecticidal control of the cocoa pod borer production of Trichogrammatoidea species alone is estimated to be US$ 192 per ha per in Malaysia (Lim,1991; Lim and Chong, year. Looking at monetary cost (and 1987; Awang et al.,1999a,2003b) and the disregarding the social and environmental Philippines (Nagaraja et al., 1985b) by both costs of using insecticides), pest control Agriculture Departments and private employing the black cocoa ant therefore has industry have had much greater success and a clear advantage over insecticidal control. have given approximately 50% reduction in losses, but at costs much higher than Low levels of natural pupal parasitism spraying insecticides. The use of egg were found in Sabah, Malaysia, but little parasites has been practised on many estates progress was made in finding alternative (CABI, 2002). hosts for the parasitoids. No practical control effort was made using indigenous Control by egg parasitoids had pupal parasitoids, as there was no indication originally been dismissed because of the of significant parasitism. However, due to small size and dispersed distribution of C. the presence of natural predators and cramerella eggs. However, considerable parasitoidss of C. cramerella, and due to effort by Lim and his colleagues concern for the natural control of other demonstrated the presence of a parasitic cocoa pests such as stem and branch borers wasp (Trichogrammatoidea sp.) in Sabah and bagworms, selective spraying was (Lim and Chong, 1987). An intensive recommended so that natural enemies (and programme of rearing these wasps on an pollinators) were not disrupted. alternative host (Corcyra cephalonica) in laboratories and commercial breeding Exploration was also undertaken to find rooms, and releasing them into the field, exotic natural enemies to import into Sabah, gave surprisingly good levels of control, but centring at first on Peninsular Malaysia. A at prohibitive costs for about 12 500 or relatively low level of C. cramerella was 25000 wasps/ha/day (CABI, 2002). known to exist on rambutan and other non- Research continues by the Malaysian Cocoa cocoa hosts in West Malaysia, and it was Board (MCB) assisted by the American

84 Cord 2006, 22 (1) cocoa Research Institute (ACRI) to develop However, the greatest benefit from rearing and release methods that will be frequent, complete harvesting is likely to be economically competitive with current gained if it is done during the low-crop control systems. period through the first half of the rising crop. Complete, frequent, regular harvesting The pathogenicity of Beauveria (CFRH) is to some extent an extension of bassiana is indicated in the high rate of the principle of rampasan, but aimed at recovery (75%-100%) of the larval emergence rather than oviposition. entomopathogen from the dead larvae, While CFRH does not completely break the pupae and moths sampled from the treated life cycle, it should help to keep the C. pods but not from the live larvae or pupae or cramerella population low (as occurs at the moths sampled from pods not exposed to B. low-crop period), and thorough early bassiana (Bong et al., 1999). harvesting helps to keep the C. cramerella population relatively low during the time when the rising peak crop is most Management susceptible to oviposition (about 2 months

after the low-crop point)(CABI, 2002). Harvesting (Rampasan)

In C. cramerella-infested areas in the In the early days rampasan was southern Philippines, some cocoa has been considered to be the only feasible control planted at very high densities in hedges with method (Roepke,1912d,1913b). Removing access for small tractors between pairs of all pods longer than 6-7 cm from a field for rows. Trees have been kept to a low height 6 weeks would break the life cycle of C. so that all harvesting can be done within cramerella, as female moths will not usually easy reach. Mechanization allows frequent, lay eggs on younger pods. But without regular harvesting, and the hedge-like heavy pruning, complete elimination of a structure of the crop (1 m squares within the population of C. cramerella through double rows, and 2-3 m between rows for rampasan is extremely unlikely (Mumford, mini-tractor access) allows very complete 1986; Mumford and Ho, 1988; Wood et al., harvesting. Under this sytem, infestations of 1992). C. cramerella were at insignificant levels

during the late 1980s, without any other The great majority of C. cramerella form of control being applied) (CABI, larvae emerge from cocoa pods after they 2002). become ripe, and that if pods are picked at the earliest stage of ripeness then almost More synchronous cropping, whether 90% of larvae will still be inside the pods achieved by plant-growth regulators or (Mumford, 1986; Mumford and Ho, 1988). selection of more seasonal cropping If pods are broken quickly and the husks cultivars or clones, creates problems with destroyed, larval mortality will be very high more seasonally varied labour demands. and a good degree of control may be achieved. Effectiveness in large trial areas In Malaysia, economic control is over a period of several seasons was achieved if 50% or fewer pods are infested, confirmed (Wood et al., 1992). Thorough and this was easily achieved by CFRH. A harvesting is required at intervals of 14 days late commercial-scale trial confirmed that it or less in order to be sure to collect pods could reduce infestation, whilst spraying before they mature and before larvae emerge with deltamethrin made little difference in the field. Unsatisfactory results may arise (Wood et al., 1992). from incomplete harvesting.

85 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Good management of the cocoa area Recent innovations, particularly at BAL and complete frequent regular harvesting is Estates in Sabah, in clonal tissue culture and having good results in containing the pest. grafting clonal tissue on to mature stems, may allow partial host-plant resistance to Mechanical control (Sleeving) play a much greater part in C. cramerella control in the future (CABI, 2002). The idea of sleeving pods with bags of plastic or other materials to prevent egg Based on the husk thickness ratio, laying originated in Indonesia. Thin plastic hardness and thickness of the sclerotic layer, bags with open bottoms for ventilation, average damage severity index and the placed on very young pods (less than 7 cm number of eggs per pod, a resistance index long) and left throughout the pod maturation to C. cramerella was calculated for each of period, can result in virtually complete 53 cocoa clones in studies in Sabah, protection from C. cramerella. In Malaysia, Malaysia.The resistance index for the bagging pods (with plastic bags (14 X 10 resistant category ranged from 4.2 for inches) open at both ends) was more LAFI7 to 19.4 for NGK28; 20.2 for 1466 to effective than removing all pods at the end 30.0 for NGK16 in the moderately resistant of the season or physical collection of pupae category; and 32.4 for NGK13 to 45.6 for (Vanialingam et al., 1982).Though costly, ICS39 in the susceptible category (Azhar et the enclosure of developing pods in paper or al., 1995). polythene bags that are open at the bottom has proved effective in the Philippines Genetic engineering (Wood, 1980). Biodegradable plastic sleeves could be used. Sleeving is unlikely to be a Out of twelve Cry proteins from feasible option for cocoa growers, other than Bacillus thuringiensis tested in bioassays on those with young trees, inexpensive family cacao plantations in Indonesia for activity labour, or those in a desperate position to against the larvae of cocoa pod borer, five ensure a partial crop) (CABI, 2002). toxins that were more active than others and three Cryl proteins with relatively little Host-plant resistance homology were all found to be toxic, opening perspectives for controlling cocoa Early Dutch interest in host-plant pod borer by expression of Cry proteins in resistance focused on the surface of the pod. transgenic plants. Eggs were generally found in the furrows on the pod surface, smoother pods being less There is however concern about the attractive than deeply ridged cultivars, safety of GM plants.The immense gulf though this appears not to have been tested between the industry perception of GM crop or developed. Subsequently no obvious safety and the environmental groups’ differences were found in egg laying on perception of their hazards stays on. It is different cultivars (Day, 1985), but crucial to distinguish between interest-based considerable differences in larval mortality and value-based motivations. Where were found inside pods of different motivation is value-based, as for cultivars. Greater mortality occurred in pods environmental pressure groups that have an with either thicker or harder stony endocarp almost religious commitment to their cause, layers in the pod wall. Larval survival was then it cannot be swayed by facts and as much as 10 times greater in soft/thin- rational argument. This issue has to be walled cultivars. Hardness of the sclerotic addressed. layer was the important factor (Azhar and Lim, 1987). Chemical control

86 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Agrocide (26% benzene hexachloride) the sprayed area were 12.1-33.7 percentage at 0.2% was best at reducing adult points lower than in the control area, giving populations and subsequent pod damage. an estimated net benefit of up to RM978/ha Decis (deltamethrin) 2.5% and Lannate in one season, assuming a cocoa price of (methomyl) were effective as ovicides. In RM4000/tonne. Losses in the sprayed area heavily infested areas Agrocide and Decis, still ranged from 7.0 to 43.1% and did not used alternately at weekly intervals, reduced decline over successive seasons. There was C. cramerella incidence by about 80% after some evidence for immigration into the two months but pod borer infestation sprayed area, but it is suggested that rapid increased significantly three months after recovery of populations following spraying the last application (Vanialingam et al., is also due to the high potential rate of 1982). increase of the insect in susceptible cocoa varieties. In susceptible cocoa varieties In Malaysia, application of Nurelle D control is always likely to be difficult, but in 505 EC, a formulation of chlorpyrifos at 500 less susceptible varieties, and with well and cypermethrin at 50 g a.i./litre, was maintained trees, chemical control by effective at 0.36 lit/ha, 6 spray applications selective application to adult resting sites significantly reducing the mean number of could be a practical component of integrated eggs and percentage pod infestation on control (Day et al., 1995). cocoa, and controlling populations for up to about 8 weeks after the last application Cocoa in South-East Asia could not (Azhar and Sabudin, 1987). survive continuous blanket sprays of broad- spectrum insecticides, because of destructive Monitoring of populations with outbreaks of secondary pests freed from pheromone traps, and a preliminary study of their normal control by natural predators and painting cocoa pods with chemical- parasitoids (Conway, 1973; Toxopeus and incorporated formulations, were also Giesberger, 1983). The long-term practical undertaken (Leong, 1987). use of insecticides for control of C. cramerella requires that the chemical is Lambda-cyhalothrin (Karate) was tested applied selectively, either to undersides of for the control of C. cramerella on cocoa in the lower branches where natural enemies Malaysia. Fortnightly spray applications at are less common, or at times when natural 14-25 ppm significantly reduced damage. enemies are less abundant. Application of 5 rounds at 2.5-3.0 g a.i./ha per round protected the subsequent crop and Adult C. cramerella rests during day reduced pod infestation to <20% and crop time on the undersides of lower branches in losses to <5%. Pod infestation levels cocoa, and this provides an ideal site for differed between pods on the trunk and selective spraying as it is relatively dry, branches of tall unpruned bushes. This dark, inert and accessible. Relatively small difference was reduced following height amounts of contact insecticide, either reduction and canopy pruning and pyrethroid or carbamate, applied to these insecticide application (Ngim et al., 1992). resting sites during the low-crop period, kept The daytime resting sites of all C. C. cramerella populations below economic cramerella were found on the undersides of damage levels during subsequent peak branches 45° or less from horizontal, and 1.5 populations (Day, 1985; Mumford and Ho, cm or more in diameter; 90% were found in 1988). As with cultural controls, heavy the lower half of trees. 25 ppm deltamethrin pruning and height maintenance ensure that was applied with knapsack sprayers to these all the lower branches are accessible. Branch sites. Five applications were made at 10-day spraying was advocated only in the low-crop intervals, each crop season (6 months), over period because this was believed to give the a 2-year period. Mean estimated losses in greatest returns, as it protected the

87 Cord 2006, 22 (1) susceptible peak crop developing in the were trapped using synthetic pheromones several months immediately following (traps baited with a polyethylene vial spraying. Protection afforded by the sprays impregnated with 1.2 mg of a mixture of only applies to the relatively low crop (4E,6Z,10Z)- and (4E,6E,10Z)- isomers of maturing in the 3 months after the peak. 4,6,10-hexadecatrienyl acetate and the corresponding alcohols, and of hexadecyl A farmer practising insecticidal control alcohol in 40:60:4:6:10 ratio) than could be of the borer is likely to spray a synthetic caught in traps baited with virgin female C. pyrethroid every other week throughout the cramerella moths (Beevor et al., 1986a,b; year. This practice increases cost of 1993); these traps could be used for both production substantially besides being a monitoring and control. Control is achieved threat to the ecosystem. Furthermore, if a large proportion of male moths are development of insecticidal resistance is a trapped before they can mate, thus reducing worry. the overall mating success of female C. cramerella moths and lowering fecundity. During the 1950's numerous trials were conducted in Indonesia on insecticide A large-scale (200-ha) trial was control, using cover sprays of broad- conducted over 4 years at BAL Estates in spectrum organochlorine insecticides. Initial Sabah during the mid 1980s, to test the results appeared to be promising for a effect of pheromone trapping as a control control, but on at least one estate in Java method (Beevor et al., 1993). Trials and over 1000ha's of cocoa had to be destroyed commercial-scale control using traps were in the late 1950's (after five years of general also undertaken on several other estates in insecticide application) due to outbreaks of Sabah. Trap densities of four and eight per stem and branch bores, which were no ha were used to give economic control. longer adequately controlled by their natural Results of these trials indicated that losses enemies. were reduced by about one-third in trapped areas compared with untreated areas. A Aerial spraying was tried in Sabah, major problem with pheromone-trapping without good results. The pesticide is mainly trials was in finding adequate untreated deposited on the shade trees where C. control areas. The pheromones were shown cramerella moths may spend some time to catch moths as far as 800 metres from between 21.00 and 06.00 h, based on the infested cocoa, and so the size of both relatively high catches of moths in treated and untreated areas needed to be pheromone traps placed above the cocoa very large to give good comparisons. canopy.Aerial spraying during the C. Neighbouring areas were also subject to cramerella quarantine-eradication effort in pruning, harvesting and spraying actions West Malaysia greatly reduced mosquito which may have distorted results. It is infestations in the estates. The best return concluded that control of C. cramerella by from pod spraying is likely to come from pheromone-baited mass trapping may reduce applications during the early stage of a pod damage and may prove to be cost rising crop, soon after the low-crop period. effective (Beevor et al., 1993). Spraying alone was not effective (Wood et al., 1992). In 1987 a race of C. cramerella was found in West Malaysia that did not respond Pheromone trapping to the pheromone used in Sabah. Analysis showed that the mixture of pheromone Female C. cramerella moths attract molecules in the new race was very different males by releasing a pheromone (Day, 1985; from the original formula, and the new Beevor et al., 1986a,b), which was identified mixture was shown to catch C. cramerella and synthesized. Many more male moths moths in West Malaysia. The new mixture

88 Cord 2006, 22 (1) also caught large numbers of C. cramerella Malaysia but they may not have good moths in Sabah, casting doubt on the future agronomic traits, thus requiring further cross of mass trapping and raising questions about breeding with the agronomically good the origins and interactions of the two races. clones. There was an immediate problem of keeping the two mixtures separated; when used The most effective control methods are together in the same trap no moths of either frequent harvesting, destruction of ripe pods type would be caught. More importantly, and husks to prevent pupation in the field however, there was a fear that further races and selective spraying of resting sites with could develop or appear which would deltamethrin, cypermethrin or lindane. require frequent changes of pheromone Pheromone mixtures have potential for use components, adding to costs and limiting in traps as a quarantine surveillance efficacy. As a result, pheromones are not technique and for control. Parasitoids, used to control C. cramerella at present, particularly T. bactrae fumata, also have although occasional commercial interest is potential as biological control agents shown in developing new pheromone (Mumford and Ho, 1988). mixtures (CABI, 2002). Success achieved in the project- Integrated Pest Management Sustainable Cocoa Extension Services for Smallholders (SUCCESS) Harvesting (Rampasan) and chemical implemented in Indonesia in conjunction control are generally adopted. The most with the American Cocoa Research immediate reductions in C. cramerella are likely to come about through better managed Institute and BCCCA, a British harvesting and spraying. Both of these rely counterpart, ACDI/VOCA could be on well-pruned trees (pruning every 3 emulated. Through SUCCESS a large- months to keep canopy light and open and scale training programme was organized remove chupon growth monthly) kept to a on integrated pest management and height low enough to collect and/or spray all pesticide-free control of the cocoa pod pods. borer. The programme included frequent harvesting, pruning, sanitation and Longer term control may be improved fertilization. Crop losses to the cocoa by grafting or replanting with hard-walled pod borer dropped from nearly 40 clones. Further releases of exotic natural percent to 15 percent, which amounted enemies may provide additional partial control, if suitable parasitoids can be found. to an increase of 12,800 tons per year worth $13.5 million. SUCCESS has In Malaysia, cocoa black ant demonstrated the potential to produce (Dolichoderus thoracicus) and egg good quality cocoa with yields at least parasitoid,(Trichogrammatoidea bactera double the local averages. The project fumata) have been found to be potential bio- provided positive effects for farmers, control agents in limiting cocoa pod borer communities and the environment. infestation. Integration of weekly harvesting SUCCESS is also encouraging the use of and spraying of Beauveria bassiana every other environmentally friendly two weeks was the most effective method to interventions for the management of control cocoa pod borer infestation in cocoa pod borer such as pheromones, Indonesia .Pod sleeving with plastic bags have been able to control cocoa pod borer in biological control, pest resistant cocoa smallholders garden but not in larger varieties and side-grafting to revitalize plantations. Some of the clones have shown unproductive cocoa trees. resistance against the cocoa pod borer in

89 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Note Anonymous, 1991. Cocoa pod borer management. The Planter, Kuala If any body has suggestions for the Lumpur 67: 299-300. effective management of cocoa pod borer, Awang, A. 1995. Potential use of black please forward your suggestions to Dr. cocoa ant and pheromone for the John Moxon, Research Programme management of cocoa pod borer. Paper Leader, Wet Lowland Islands presented at Workshop on Recent Programme, National Agricultural Advances in the Management of Cocoa Research Institute (NARI), Keravat, P.O. Pod Borer (with special reference to Box 204, Kopoko 613, East New Britain Tbf), Marco Polo Hotel, Tawau, Sabah. Province, Papua New Guinea Tel: (675) 29 June 1995. 983 9145/983 9200, Fax: (675) 475 1034 Email: [email protected] and Dr. Vele Awang, A. 1997. Potential use of Ila‘va, CEO, Cocoa & Coconut Institute, Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata Tavilo Research Station – ENBP, P.O. Nagaraja for the management of cocoa Box 1846, Rabaul, ENBP, Papua New pod borer, 12 pp. Paper presented at Guinea, Tel.: +675 983-9115, Fax: +675 ASEAN Cocoa Club Workshop on 983-9116, Email: [email protected]; Cocoa Primary Production Technology ccriento @datec.net.pg. and Quality Management, Marco Polo Hotel, Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia, 2-4 October 1997. Bibliography Awang, A. 1998. Management of cocoa Abdullah, R. B., Azhar, I. and Hassan, S. T. pests in Malaysia. Paper presented at S. 2001. Role of cocoa black ant International Cocoa Pests and Disease. (CBA), Dolichoderus thoracicus, in the Cote d’Ivorie, 19-21 January 1996. dispersal of cocoa mealybug, Awang, A. 2002a. Kawalan agen biologi Cataenococcus hispidus. Paper serangga perosak koko. Kertas kerja Presented at the FRIM ENTOMA dibentangkan di Persidangan ke 2 Seminar on Insect Diversity, 2-3 Kakitangan Kumpulan Sokongan II di October 2000, FRIM, . Pusat Latihan BSN, Bangi, Selangor on Alba, M. C., Salvador, A. C., Galbizo, T. C. 7-10 Aug 2002. and Easaw, P. T. 1985. Additional Awang, A. 2002b. Teknologi Pengurusan information on the biology of Serangga Perosak Koko. Kertas kerja Acrocercops cramerella Snellen dibentangkan di Kursus Teknologi (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in the Koko, Pusat Penyelidikan dan Philippines. Philippine Entomol. 6: 243- Pengeluaran Koko, Hilir Perak. 2-6 253. September 2002. Anonymous, 1980. Editorial, An industry in Awang, A. 2002c. Teknologi Pengurusan peril. The Planter 56: 359-361. Serangga Perosak Koko. Kertas kerja Anonymous, 1987a. Editorial, The decline dibentangkan di Kursus Teknologi and (hopefully) fall of the cocoa pod Koko, Pusat Penyelidikan dan borer in Peninsular Malaysia. The Pengurusan Kualiti Koko, Tawau, Planter 63: 484-486. Sabah. 19-24 September 2002. Anonymous, 1987b. Introduction to the Awang, A. and Lee, M. T. 1998. Research cocoa pod borer, pp. 1-6. In: on mass rearing and field release of egg Management of the Cocoa Pod Borer, parasitoid, Trichogrammatoidea P. A. C. Ooi, et al. (Eds.). MAPPS, bactrae fumata Nagaraja for the control Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. of cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha

90 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

cramerella (Snellen) in Malaysia. Paper Selangor, Malaysia, 18-19th March presented at 5th International 1999. Symposium of Trichogramma and Other Awang, A., Lamin, K. and Lee, M. T. Egg Parasitoid, Cali, Colombia. 4-7 1999b.Use of yeast as alternative March 1998. protein source in feed formulation for Awang, A. Hasim, S. and Kelvin Lamin, the rice moth eggs production. Paper 2003a. Optimum release density of egg presented at MCB-MAPPS Conference, parasitoid Trichogrammatoidea bactrae Kota Kinabalu, Sabah on 2-3 November fumata Nagaraja for controlling cocoa 1999. pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella Awang, A., Lamin, K., Lee, M. T. and (Snellen) in Malaysia. Kertas kerja Sastroutomo, S. S. 1999c. Biological dibentangkan di Persidangan Pegawai control in the tropics: towards efficient Kanan Lembaga Koko Malaysia, Hotel biodiversity and bioresource Hilton, Kuching, Sarawak. 23-25 management for effective biological September 2003. control, pp. 48-51. In: Proceedings of Awang, A., Lamin, K. and Hasim, S. the Symposium on Biological Control in 2003b. Mass production and utilization the Tropics held at MARDI Training of egg parasitoid Trichogrammatoidea Centre, L. W. Hong (Ed.), from 18-19 bactrae fumata Nagaraja as an March, 1999, Serdang, Malaysia. alternative method for the control of Awang, A., Lamin,K., Lee, M. T. and cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha Sulaiman Hashim, 1999d.Cocoa pod cramerella (Snellen) in Malaysia. Paper borer tolerance screening study on some presented at 14th International Cocoa commercial cocoa clones. Paper Research Conference, Ghana. 14-18 presented at MCB-MAPPS Conference, October 2003. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia on 2-3 Awang, A., Hasim, S. and Kelvin Lamin, November 1999. 2003c. Parasit telor, Pengeluaran dan Awang, A., Lamin, K. and Mohd Shakri, A. Kenerkesanannya di dalam kawalan ulat 2001. A preliminary results on the pengorek buah koko. Kertas kerja establishments of cocoa black cntas dibentangkan di Bengkel Perlindungan Dolichoderus spp. in Sabah Malaysia Tanaman Koko 2003, Hotel Emas, and their effect on cocoa pod borer Tawau, Sabah. 20-21 Oktober 2003. Conopomorpha cramerella damage. 4th Awang, A., Hasim, S. and Kelvin Lamin. Asia Pacifice Confeerence on 2004. Mass production of egg Entomology, Renaissance Kuala parasitoid. Paper presented at Lumpur Hotel. 14-17 Aug 2001. Commercilization Seminar, Marriot Awang, A., Lee, M. T. and Hasim, S. 1998a. Hotel Putrajaya, Kuala Lumpur, Effect of cold storage on the emergence Malaysia. of parasitised rice moth eggs. Poster Awang, A., Lamin, K. and Lee, M. T. Session at Malaysian International 1999a.The use of egg parasitoid, Cocoa Conference, Kuala Lumpur. 26- Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata 27th November 1998. Nagaraja for the control of cocoa pod Awang, A., Rita Muhamad and Chong, K. borer, Conopomorpha cramerella K. 1988b. Comparative merits of cocoa (Snellen) Research progress, constraints pod and shoot as food sources of mirid, and prospect. Paper presented at Helopeltis theobromae Miller. Planter Symposium on the Biological Control in 64(744): 100-104. the Tropics. Pusat Latihan MARDI,

91 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Awang, A., Lee, M. T., Lamin, K. and Azhar,I. 1986c. Pengorek buah koko Hasim, S. 2002. Optimum release Conopomorpha cramerella satu density of egg parasitoid ancaman terhadap koko di Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata Semenanjung Malaysia.Cocoa pod Nagaraja for controlling cocoa pod borer, a potential threat to Peninsular, borer, Conopomorpha cramerella Malaysia. Paper presented at Seminar Snellen in Malaysia. Paper presented at Teknologi Koko Masakini Kedua, 23 pp. 6th Egg Parasitoid Symposium, Italy. (In Bahasa Malaysia) (Mimeographed). 15-18 September 2002. Azhar, I. 1988a. Host plant resistance to Awang, A., Meriam, M. Y. and Hasim, S. cocoa pod borer - A research progress, 2000. Pengurusan Teknologi Serangga pp. 1-27. In: Proc. MARDI Senior Staff Perosak Koko yang efisien. Kertas kerja Conf., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. dibentangkan di Kursus Teknologi Azhar, I. 1988b. Mengenalpasti serangga Koko Lanjutan 2000. Beringgis Beach perosak koko melalui kesan dan Resort, Papar, Sabah. 12-15 November simptom serangan Identification of 2000, Hotel Rajah Court, Kuching, cocoa insect pests through damage and Sarawak. 22-25 Oktober 2000, Hotel attacked symptoms. Lapuran MARDI Residence, Bangi, Selangor. 25-27 No. 122, 26 pp. September 2000. Azhar, I. 1989. Towards the development of Awang, A., Sadao Wakamura and Tay, E. B. integrated pest management of 1995. Efficacy of mating distruption Helopeltis in Malaysia. MARDI Res. J. using synthetic sex pheromone for the 17: 55-68. management of cocoa pod borer. Paper presented at International Workshop of Azhar, I. 1990a. Postharvest management Cocoa Pod Borer, Sulawesi, Indonesia. of cocoa pod borer (Lepidoptera: 16-18 October 1995. Gracillariidae) MARDI Res. J. 18: 71- 80. Azhar, I. 1985a. Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen), a new name for the cocoa pod Azhar, I. 1990b. Studies on sclerotic layer borer. MAPPS Newsl.9: 4. hardness of cocoa pod. MARDI Res. J. 18(1): 63-69. Azhar, I. 1985b. Natural and cultural control in the management of selected cocoa Azhar, I. 1992. Role of black ants in cocoa pests, pp. 225-267. In: Integrated pest pod borer natural control.MAPPS management in Malaysia, B. S. Lee, W. Newsl. 16(4): 36-37. H. Loke and K. L. Heong (Eds.). Azhar, I. 1994a. Ants mealybugs Malaysian Plant Protection Society, interactions in cocoa - Density Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. dependent mutualism, pp. 88-89. Azhar, I. 1986a. Ancaman pengorek buah In: Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Plant Prot. koko Conopomorpha cramerella Trop., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Terhadap Industri holo de Malaysia. I. Azhar, I. 1994b. Fitting two empirical Perihal Biologi dan Keroskan in models to the dispersal of cocoa pod Malaysian. Teknol. Koko-Kelapa, Jil. 2, borer egg parasitoid after a release, pp. pp. 53-59. 336-338. In: Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Azhar, I. 1986b. Ancaman pengorek buah Plant Prot. Trop., Kuala Lumpur, koko Conopomorpha cramerella Malaysia. Terhadap Industri Koko Ki Malaysia. Azhar, I. 2001a. Cocoa black ant (CBA) as a III. Pengurusan perosak ini in bioindicator of the cocoa and coconut Malaysian. Teknol. Koko-Kelapa, Jil. 2, agroecosystern health measured pp. 71-76.

92 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

indirectly through the level of cocoa Azhar, I. and Mamot, D. 1989. Kesan pod borer (CPB) infestation. In: Proc. serangan pengorek buah koko, 13th Internat. Cocoa Res. Conf. 8-12 Conopomorpha cramerella terhadap October 2000, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, mutu biji koko kering keputusan awal, Malaysia. pp. 1-9. In: Proc. Seminar Teknol. Koko Masakini III. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Azhar, I. 2001b. Measuring ovipositional preference of the cocoa pod borer, Azhar, I. and Musa, M. J. 1988. Studies on Conopomorpha cramerella the faunal and floral communities in the (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) to Various debris of the coconut crown. In: Proc. Cocoa Clone,. pp. 57-59. In: Proc. Nat. Cocon. Conf., Kuala Lumpur, Incoped 3rd Internat. Seminar, 16-17 Malaysia, 1982. October 2000. Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Azhar, I. and Sabudin, M. A. 1987. A field Malaysia. evaluation of an EC formulation of Azhar, I. and Awang, A. 2001c. Potensi chlorpyrifos + cypermethrin for the penggunaan agen biologi untuk control of cocoa pod borer, mengawal pengorek buah koko. Kertas Conopomorpha cramerella (Snell.) kerja dibentangkan di Persidangan MARDI Res. 16(1): 181-186. Kebangsaan Pekebun Kecil Koko 2001. Azhar, I. and Zam, A. K. 1986. The cocoa Hotel Promenade, 23-25 Oktober 2001, podborer Conopomorpha cramerella Malaysia. (Snell.). Identification guide to Azhar, I. and Lim, D. H. K. 1987. An infestation and damage symptoms. investigation on the use of host plant Risalah Pertanian Bil. No. 12b. Dept. resistance and crop manipulation in the of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, 8 pp. management of cocoa pod borer, pp. Azhar, I., Awang, A. and Meriam M. Y. 83-101. In: Management of the Cocoa 2000. Research on the management of Pod Borer, P. A. C. Ooi, G. C. Luz, K. cocoa pod borer in Malaysia. Paper C. Khoo, C. H. Teoh, M. Md. Jusoh, C. presented at Proc. Incoped 3rd Int. Sem. T. Ho and G. S. Lim (Eds.), Malaysian Cocoa Pests Dis., 16-17 October, Kota Plant Protection Society, Kuala Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Lumpur, Malaysia. Azhar, I., Awang, A. and Meriam, M. Y. Azhar, I. and Long, G. E. 1991. The ecology 2001a. Research on the cocoa pod borer of cocoa pod borer, Conopornorpha in Malaysia, pp. 105-113. In: Proc. cramerella (Snellen) (Lepidoptera: Incoped 3rd Int. Sem. Cocoa Pests Dis., Gracillariidae), in Malaysia: Dispersion 16-17 October 2000, Kota Kinabalu, pattern and sampling plan for eggs on Sabah, Malaysia. pods. J. Plant. Prot. Trop. 8: 103-110. Azhar, I., Jalil, N. S. A. and Hassan, S. T. S. Azhar, I. and Long, G. E. 1993. Role of 2001b. Variations in colony strength pod shaped, color and spatial and local foraging pattern of the cocoa distribution on egg distribution and egg black ant, Dolichoderus thoracicus in parasitism of cocoa pod borer, cocoa-coconut ecosystem. In: Proc. Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen) Incoped 3rd Int. Sem. Cocoa Pests Dis., (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). MARDI 16-17 October 2000, Kota Kinabalu, Res. J. 21(1): 59-70. Sabah, Malaysia. Azhar, I. and Long, G. E. 1996. Effect of Azhar, I., Long, G. E. and Musa, M. J.1995. cocoa pod age on distribution and egg Qualitative and multivariate analyses of parasitism of the cocoa pod borer in clonal cocoa resistance to cocoa pod Malaysia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 81: 81- 89.

93 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

borer (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Bradley, J. D. 1985. A change of generic Planter 71(832): 307-321. name of the cocoa moth, Acrocerops cramerella (Snellen) (Lepidoptera: Azhar, I., Roslan, S., Karim, R. A., Zailani, Gracillariidae). Entomol. Rec. 97: 29- and Musa, M. J.1992.The use and 30. effectivness of used sump oil in controlling cocoa pod borer. Teknol. Bradley, J. D. 1986. Identity of the South- Koko-Kelapa Jil. 8, pp. 21-28. East Asian cocoa moth, Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen) (Lepidoptera: Beevor, P. S, Mumford, J. D., Shah, S., Day, Gracillariidae), with descriptions of R. K. and Hall, D. R. 1993. three allied new species. Bull. Entomol. Observations on pheromone-baited Res. 76(1): 41-51. mass trapping for control of cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella, in CABI, 2002. Crop Protection Compendium Sabah, East Malaysia. Crop Prot. 12 (Second Edition). CAB International, (2): 134-140. Wallingford, UK. Beevor, P. S., Cork, A., Hall, D. R., Nesbitt, Chaidamsari Tetty, 2005. Biotechnology for B. F., Day, R. K. and Mumford, J. D. cocoa pod borer resistance in cocoa. 1986a. Components of female sex Dissertation -Thesis (doctoral)-- pheromone of cocoa pod borer moth, Wageningen Universiteit, 2005. Conopomorpha cramerella. J. Chem. Netherlands. Plant Research Ecol. 12:1-23. International, P.O. Box 16, 6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands. (English, Beevor, P. S., Day, R. K. and Mumford, J. summary in Dutch and Bahasa D. 1986b.Female sex pheromone of Indonesia). cocoa pod borer moth, Acrocercops cramerella -Identification and field Cheong, P. C. H. and Mohamed, M. 1999. evaluation, pp. 287-292. In: Cocoa and Comparison of morphology of Sabah Coconuts Progress and Outlook, E. and West Malaysian Dolichoderus Puspharajah and P. S. Chew (Eds.). thoracicus group (Hymenoptera: Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Formicidae), pp. 135-136. In: Lumpur, Malaysia. Proceedings of the MCB-MAPPS Plant Protection Conference 1999, Betrem, J. G. 1941. Notes on the genera Sustainable Crop Protection Practices Goryphus Holmgren 1868 and Ancaria in the Next Millennium, Z. Sidek, C. L. Cam. 1902 (Hym.: Ichn.:Crypt.).(Notes Bong, V. S. Kanapathipillai, C. A. Ong on IndoMalayan Ichneumonids IV.) and H. A. Kadir (Eds.). Malaysian Plant Treubia 18(1): 45-101. Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, Bong, C. L., Ruslan, A., Norlela, H., Fuddin, Malaysia. S. S., Awang, A., Markos, A., Hong, L. Chin, F. 1987. Views on the eradication W., Sastroutomo, S. S., Caunter, I. G., programme for the cocoa pod borer in Ali, J., Yeang, L. K. and Sen, Y. H. Peninsular, Malaysia, pp. 176-180. In: 1999. Biological control in the tropics: Proc. Symp. Manag. Cocoa Pod Borer, towards efficient biodiversity and March, 1987, Malaysian Plant bioresource management for effective Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, biological control, pp. 147-150. In: Malaysia. Proc. Symp. Biol.Control Trop. S. Vijaysegaran (Ed.). Held at MARDI CIBC,1986. Annual Report 1985-1986. Training Centre, Serdang, Malaysia CAB International Institute of from 18-19 March, 1999. CABI Biological Control.Commonwealth Publishing, Wallingford, UK. Institute of Biological Control.Imperial

94 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

College, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks., cocoa pod borer, Acrocercops UK, 59 pp. cramerella Snellen in Sabah. MAPPS News, 7(1) (Supplement): 6-7. CIE, 1984. Distribution Maps of Pests No. 458. Wallingford, UK: CAB Day, R. K. 1985.Control of the cocoa pod International. borer Conopomorpha cramerella. Ph.D. thesis. London, UK: Imperial College, CIRAD ADKINDO, 1998.Workshop on the University of London. future of Indonesian cocoa through replanting and pest disease control. Day, R. K. 1986. Population dynamics of Centre de Cooperation Internationale en cocoa pod borer Acrocercops Recherche Agronomique pour le cramerella. Importance of host plant Developpement (CIRAD), Jakarta cropping cycle, pp. 255-263. In: Cocoa Selatan, Indonesia. and Coconuts Progress and Outlook, E. Pushparajah, E. and P. S. Chew (Eds.). Conway, G. R. 1971. Pests of cocoa in Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Sabah and their control.Kementerian Lumpur, Malaysia. Pertanian and Perikanan Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. Day, R. K. 1989. Effect of cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella, on cocoa Conway, G. R. 1973. Ecological aspects of yield and quality in Sabah, Malaysia. pest control in Malaysia, pp. 467-488. Crop Prot. 8(5): 332-339. In: The Careless Technology, M.U. Farvar and J. P. Milton (Eds). Stacey, Day, R. K., Mumford, J. D. and Hing, H. S. London. 1995. Adult resting sites as a target for chemical control of the cocoa pod borer, Conway, G. R., Mumford, J. D. and Day, R. Conopomorpha cramerella K. 1983. Report of a visit to Sabah (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), in (April 1983). EMPA Cocoa Pod Borer Malaysia. Bull. Entomol.Res. 85(1): 45- Research, Kota Kinabalu. 13 pp. 52. (Mimeographed). De Haan, J. T. 1927. Verslag over de Dammerman, K. W. 1929. The werkzaamheden van het Proefstation Agricultural Zoology of the Malay Midden Java gedurende het jaar 1926. Archipelago. J. H. de Bussy Ltd., (Report on the work of the Central Java Amsterdam, 473 pp. Experiment Station for 1926. Meded. Davis, L. S. F. 1989a.Sampling scheme for Proefst. Midden Java, Salatiga No. 44, the detection and estimation of the pp. 16-30. incidence of infestation of cocoa pods Departmen Pertanian, 1983. Pengenalan, by cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha pengamatan dan pengendalian nama cramerella (Snellen), Technical Bull. cacaomot pada tanaman cokelat. Dept. Agric., Sabah No. 7, 18 pp. Direktorat Perlindungan Tanaman Davis, L. S. F. 1989b.Assessment of cocoa Perkebunan, Departmen Pertanian, bean loss caused by cocoa pod borer. Jakarta, 25 pp. (In Bahasa Indonesia). Technical Bull. Dept. Agric., Sabah No. Department of Agriculture, 1978. New 8, 45 pp. records Indonesia cocoa. FAO Plant Day, R. K. 1983a. Control of the cocoa pod Prot. Committee for the South East Asia borer Acrocercops cramerella in Sabah. and Pacific Region, Quarterly Newsl. 10th Internat. Congr. Plant Protection, 21: 3. Brighton, UK 3: 1075. Department of Agriculture, 1981. Cocoa Day, R. K. 1983b. Progress towards an Pests-Cocoa pod borer Acrocercops integrated control programme for the cramerella studies. Ann.Res. Rep.,

95 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Dept. Agric., Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, pp. . Department of Agriculture, 1982a. Cocoa Entwistle, P. F. 1972. Pests of Cocoa. pod borer, Acrocercops cramerella. Longman Group Ltd, London, 778 pp. Dept. Agric. (Sabah), Leaflet No. 608, Flores, T. B. and Dewi, N. M. 1983. 12 pp. Evaluation of insecticides for pod borer Department of Agriculture, 1982b. control. (Study 111). Termination Comparative study of the optimum Report. Twin Rivers Res. Center, dosage rate of deltamethrin required for Madaum, Tagum, Davao. (Unpublished the effective control of the cocoa pod report). borer. Ann.Res.Rep., Dept. Agric., Furtek, D., Kasran, R., Johnsiul, L., Sabah, pp. 72-73. Mohammed, A., Hartney, V., Mohd Department of Agriculture, 1982c. Lapuran Yusof, M., Lamin, K., Tan, C. L. and tinjauan Acrocercops cramerella Eskes, A. 2001. Biotechnology research (Snell.) keatas buah rambutan di by the Malaysian cocoa board, pp. 143- Semenanjung Malaysia [A survey 148. In: Proceedings of the report of Acrocercops cramerella International Workshop on New (Snell.) on rambutan fruits in Peninsular Technologies and Cocoa Breeding, M. Malaysia]. Entomol.Section, Crop T. Lee, F. Bekele and M. End (Eds.). Prot.Branch, Dept. Agric., Kuala 16-17 October 2000. Kota Kinabalu, Lumpur, 8 pp (Mimeographed). Sabah, Malaysia. Department of Agriculture, 1983. Gauld, I. D. 1976. Description of a new Investigation on the chemical control in genus of Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) controlling cocoa pod borer of economic importance from Sabah Acrocercops cramerella. Ann.Res. Rep., (Malaysia). Bull. Entomol. Res. 66: 1-4. Dept. Agric., Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Gavarra, M. R. 1990. Laboratory screening Malaysia. of some insecticides for the control of Department of Agriculture, 1985. the cacao pod borer, Conopomorpha Contingency plan for the eradication cramerella (Snellen). Philippines and control of a dangerous pest (Plant Entomol. 8: 731-736. Quarantine Act 1976) cocoa pod borer Giesberger, G. 1983. Biological control of Conopomorpha (Acrocercops) Helopeltis pest of cocoa in Java - A crammerella (Snellen). Dept. of critical review of forty years (1901- Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, 48 pp. 1941) research on Helopeltis, with (Mimeographed). special reference to the role of black Department of Agriculture, Peninsular cocoa ant Dolichoderus bituberculatus Malaysia, 1990. Status of cocoa pod Mayr in the biological control system, borer infestation in Peninsular pp. 91-180. In: Archives of Cocoa Malaysia. MAPPS Newsl. 14(3): 35. Research. 2. Cocoa Research in Indonesia 1900-1950. H. Toxopeus Eloja, A. L. and Gandia, I. M. 1964. and P. C. Wessel (Eds.). American Progress report on the control of the Cocoa Research Institute and cacao pod borer Acrocercops International Office of Cocoa and cramerella (Sn.) with insecticides. Chocolate, Wageningen. Philippine J. Agric. 27: 97-103. Halmy, A., Tan, S. G., Rita, M. and Gan, Y. El-Sayed Ashraf, M. 2005. The Pherobase: Y. 1987. Esterase and Database of Insect Pheromones and phosphoglucomutase polymorphism in Semiochemicals.

96 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

the rambutan fruit borer, Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen). Malaysia. J.Plant Prot. Trop. 4: 101-105. Hwang, J. S. and Hsieh, F. K. 1989. The Ho, C. T. 1994a. Relationship between black bionomics of the cocoa pod borer, cocoa ant, Dolichoderus thoracicus Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen) in (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) abundance Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. Taipei 31: and cocoa borer, Conopomorpha 387-395. cramerella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Hwang, J. S., Hung, C. C., Yen, Y. P. and damage in a cocoa plantation, pp. 214- Chen, C. N. 1996. Sex attractant and 215. In: Proc.4th Int. Plant Prot. Trop., trap designs for trapping litchi fruit A. Rajan and Y. B. Ibrahim (Eds.). borer, Conopomorpha sinedsis Bradley. Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Plant Prot. Bull. 38(2): 129-136. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Incorporated Society of Planters, 1980. An Ho, C. T. 1994b. Relationships between industry in peril. Planter 56: 359-361. black cocoa ant, Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Irshad, M., Vanialingam, T. and Eashaw, P. on loses due to Helopeltis theivora T. 1984. Potential of biological control (Heteroptera: Miridae), black pod for the cacao pod borer, Acrocercops disease, and mammalian pests in cocoa cramerella Snell. in the Philippines. in Malaysia. Bull. Entomol.Res. 82: Philippine Entomol. 6: 171-180. 485-491. Jansen, A. J. F. 1860. Aantekingen Ho, C. T. and Khoo, K. C. 1994. Some betreffende de kakao cultuur in de factors influencing sustenance of high residentie Manado. Natuurkundig activity of black cocoa ant, Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indie 20 Dolichoderus thoracicus vierde serie deel VI, pp. 289-307. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in cocoa th Johney, K. V., Teo, H. T. and Ng, K. Y. estates, pp. 218-210. In: Proc.4 1986. Evaluation of synthetic Internat. Plant Prot. Trop., A. Rajan pyrethroid for the control of cocoa and Y. B. Ibrahim (Eds.). Malaysian podborer, Conopomorpha cramerella Plant Protection Society, Kuala Snellen (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), Lumpur, Malaysia. pp. 390-394. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Ho, C. T. and Khoo, K. C. 1997. Partners in Plant Prot. Trop. (Extended Abstract), biological control of cocoa pests: Malaysian Plant Prot. Soc., Kuala Mutualism between Dolichoderus Lumpur, Malalaysia. thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Julius, I., Choong, C. T., Yap, T. H., and and Cataenococcus hispidus Ng, K. Y. 1992. Beta cyfluthrin, a (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Bull. synthetic pyrethroid insecticide for the Entomol. Res. 87: 461-470. control of lepidopterous pests, p. 71. In: Ho, S. H., Beevor, P. S. and Mumford, J. D. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Plant Prot. Trop., 1987. A practical approach to the Malaysian Plant Protection Society, control of the cocoa pod borer using Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. synthetic sex pheromone in an Kalshoven, L. G. E. 1981. Pests of Crops integrated system. pp. 53-68. In: in Indonesia. (Revised by van der Laan, Management of the Cocoa Pod Borer, P. A. 1981). P. T. Ichtian Banovan P. A. C. Ooi, G. C. Luz, K. C. Khoo, C. Woeve, Jakarta, 701 pp. H. Teoh, M. Md. Jusoh, C. T. Ho and G. S. Lim (Eds.), Malaysian Plant Kang, S. M., Azhar, I., Loke, W. H. and Musa, M. J. 1983. The cocoa pod borer

97 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Acrocercops cramerella Snellen in Kueh, T. K., Gumbek, M. and Tang D. T. H. Sabah, a threat to the cocoa industry in 1985. Malaysia cocoa pod borer on Peninsular Malaysia. Crop Prot. Branch, cocoa. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 33: 43. Dept. of Agric., Kuala Lumpur, Kuroko, H. and Lewvanich, A. 1983. Some Malaysia, 18 pp. lepidopterous insect pests attacking Khoo, K. C. 1991. Current status of cocoa economically important plants in pest management in Malaysia. In: XII Thailand. Bull.Univ. Osaka Prefec., B. International Plant Protection Agric. Biol. 35: 1-9. Congress, Rio de Janeiro, Barzil. Lall, B. S. and Sharma, D. D. 1978. Studies Khoo, K. C. and Ang, B. N. 1991. Artificial on the bionomics and control of the leaf litter nests for Dolichoderus cacao moth Acrocercops cramerella thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Snellen (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). colony size and technique for estimating Pesticides, pp. 40-42. numbers of the various life stages. In: Laoh, J. P. 1953. De bestrijding van Internat. Conf. Biol. Control Trop. Helopeltis met DDT en andere Agric., Genting Highlands, Malaysia. chloorhoudende insecticiden. The Khoo, K. C. and Awang, A. 1992. control of Helopeltis with DDT and Colonization of artificial leaf litter nests other chlorinated insecticides. by Dolichoderus thoracicus. Paper Bergcultures 22: 84-88 (With presented at IRPA Seminar, Kuala summaries in English and Bahasa Lumpur, Malaysia. Indonesia). Khoo, K. C. and Chung, G. F. 1989. Use of Laoh, J. P. 1954. De bestrijding van black cocoa ant to control mirid damage Acrocercops cramerella in cacao. in cocoa. The Planter 65: 370-383. Bergcultures 23: 67-76. Khoo, K. C. and Ho, C. T. 1992. The influence of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on losses due to Helopeltis theivora (Heteroptera: Miridae), black pod disease, and mammalian pests in cocoa in Malaysia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 82: 485-491. Khoo, K. C. and Mohamad, M. 1981. The cocoa pod borer Acrocercops cramerella (Snell.): Report of a visit to Tawau, Sabah, 23-28 March 1981. Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang. Khoo, K. C., Chung, G. F., Tey, C. L., Awang, A. and Liew, V. K. 1993. Effect of black cocoa ants on the cocoa pod borer-Research progress. Paper presented at Seminar on Conopomorpha cramerella Quo Vadis? 8 December 1993, Allson Klana Hotel, Seremban, N. Sembilan. Knutson, A. 1998. The Trichogramma manual. The Texas A and M University System, USA, 42 pp.

98 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Lee, C. T. 1995. Mass rearing of in a cocoa-coconut agroecosystem, pp. Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata 216-217. In: Proc. 4th Int. Plant Prot. Nagaraja for the management of cocoa Trop., A. Rajan and Y. B. Ibrahim pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella (Eds.). Malaysian Plant Protection Snellen. Paper presented at the Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Workshop on Cocoa Pod Borer, on 16- Liew, V. K., Sukri, T., Ahmad, F. Z., Leong, 18 October 1995 at Ujung Pandang C. W. and Khoo, K. C. 1999. Control of Sulawesi, Indonesia, 12 pp. the cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha Lee, C. T. and Sidhu, M. 1994. Evaluation cramerella with the black cocoa ant of insect growth regulators and other Dolichoderus thoracicus in two types of chemicals for pod borer Conopomorpha agroecosystem. Paper presented at cramerella (Snellen) control in cocoa Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Plant Prot. Trop., plantations, pp. 81-84. In: Proc. 4th Int. 15-18 March, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Conf. Plant Prot. Trop., A. Rajan and Lim, G. T. 1983a. Trichogrammatoidea Y. B. Ibrahim (Eds.). Malaysian Plant bactrae fumata Nagaraja, a new egg Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, parasitoid of cocoa, pp. 12-13. In: Proc. Malaysia. Seminar on Advance in Plant Prot., Lee, C. T., Tay, E. B. and Lee, M. T. 1995. Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Mass rearing of TBF. Paper presented at Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. the Workshop on Recent Advances in Lim, G. T. 1983b. Trichogrammatoidea the Management of Cocoa Pod Borer bactrae fumata Nagaraja (With special reference to TBF), Marco (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) a Polo Hotel, Tawau, Sabah, Malaysia. new egg parasitoid of Acrocercops June 29, 1995. cramerella Snellen. MAPPS Newsl. 7 Leong, C. T. 1987. Cocoa pod borer, pp. 59. (Suppl.): 5-6. Annual Report of the Research Branch, Lim, G. T. 1984. The behavioural studies Department of Agriculture for the year on cocoa pod borer, Acrocercops 1986-1987. Ministry of Agriculture and cramerella Snellen, pp. 539-542. In: 9th Community Development, Sarawak, Int. Cocoa Res. Conf., Togo. Malaysia. Lim, G. T. 1985a. Observation on the Leong, C. T. S. and Awang, A. 1994. Cocoa biology of rambutan moth pod borer and other cocoa pests. 29-30 Conopomorpha cramerella Snellen. March, MCB DOA Sarawak on cocoa Ann. Res. Rep., Dept. Agric., Sabah, rehabilitation, Sarawak, Malaysia. Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. Liew, V. I.1999. Control in the Tropics. 18- Lim, G. T. 1985b.The biology of pupal 19 March, Pusat Latihan MARDI, parasitoid Paraphylax sp. of cocoa pod Selangor, Malaysia. borer Conopomorpha cramerella Liew, V. K. 1999. Spatial and temporal Snellen. Ann. Res. Rep., Dept. Agric., distribution of Dolichoderus thoracicus Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. Smith in a cocoa coconut Lim, G. T. 1986a. Biological studies on agroecosystem. Master of Agricultural Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata Science thesis, University Putra, Nagaraja in the laboratory. J. Appl. Malaysia, 85 pp. Entomol. 101: 48-54. Liew, V. K., Khoo, K. C. and Leong, C. W. Lim, G. T. 1986b. Seasonal fluctuation of 1994. A re-evaluation of cost of cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha establishment of Dolichoderus cramerella Snellen in Tawau, Sabah, p. thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 114. In: Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. PIant

99 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Prot. Tropics (Extended Abstracts). 293-297. In: Cocoa and Coconuts Malaysian Plant Prot. Sec., Kuala Progress and Outlook, E. Pushparajah Lumpur, Malaysia. and P. S. Chew (Eds.). Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur, Lim, G. T. 1992a. Biology, ecology and Malaysia. control of cocoa podborer Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen), Lim, G. T. and Phua, P. K. 1986. Effect of pp. 85-100. In: Cocoa Pest and Disease cocoa podborer Acrocercops cramerella Management in and (Snellen) on yield and bean size, pp. Australasia, P. J. Keane and C. A. J. 325-336. In: Cocoa and Coconuts Putter (Eds.). FAO Plant Production and Progress and Outlook, E. Pushparajah Protection Paper No. 112, FAO, Rome. and P. S. Chew (Eds.). Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur, Lim, G. T. 1992b.Recent development of Malaysia. cocoa insect pests management in Sabah Malaysia, pp. 36-53. In: Proc. 3rd Lim, G. T. and Sim, C. H. 1982. Major Int. Conf. Plant Prot. Trop., Kuala insect pests of cocoa in Sabah. Paper Lumpur, Malaysia, Malaysian Plant presented at Seminar Penyelidikan Protection Society. Koko Untuk Pembangunan Pertanian Negara (Nov. 3, 1982), Bukit Quoin, Lim, G. T. 1991. Augmentative release of Tawau, 9 pp. (Mimeographed). Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata for the control of cocoa podborer in Lim, G. T., Ho, C. T., Md. Jusah, M., Teoh, Sabah, Malaysia. Colloques de l'INRA C. H., Khoo, K. C., Chan, L. G. and No. 56, pp. 205-208. Ooi, P. A. C. 1987a. The cocoa pod borer (An Introduction and Abstract), Lim, G. T. and Chong, T. C. 1986. pp.103. The Malaysian Plant Protection Biologial control of cocoa pod borer Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Conopomorpha cramerella Snellen in Sabah, Malaysia, p. 116. In: Proc. 2nd Lim, G. T., Ho, C. T., Md. Jusah, M., Teoh, Int. Conf. PIant Prot. Trop. (Extended C. H., Khoo, K. C., Chan, L. G. and Abstracts). Malaysian Plant Prot. Soc. Ooi, P. A. C. 1987b. The cocoa pod (MAPPS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. borer (An Introduction and Abstracts), 192 pp. The Malaysian Plant Protection Lim, G. T. and Chong, T. C. 1987. Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Biological control of cocoa pod borer by periodic release of Lim, G. T., Pang, T. C. and Pan, K. Y. Trichogrammatoidea bactrae fumata 1986. Vertical distribution of the cocoa Nagaraja in Sabah, Malaysia. pp. 71-80. pod borer Conopomorpha cramerella In: Proc. Symp. Manag. Cocoa Pod Snellen, pp.117. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Borer, Malaysian Plant Protection PIant Prot. Trop. (Extended Abstracts). Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Lim, G. T. and Pan, K. Y. 1985. The spinning (stitching) behaviour of the Lim, G. T., Tay, E. B., Pang, T. C., Pan, K. cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha Y., Lee, B. S., Lim, T. M., Teoh, C. cramerella Snellen. Ann. Res. Rep., H., Ibrahim, Y., and Heong, K. L. 1982. Dept. Agric. Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, The biology of cocoa pod borer, pp. Malaysia. 275-287. Acrocercops cramerella Sneller and its control in Sabah, Lim, G. T. and Pan, K. Y. 1986. Malaysia. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Plant Observations on the survival of mature Prot. Trop., 1- 4 March, Kuala Lumpur, larvae and pupae of cocoa pod borer Malaysia. Acrocercops cramerella Snellen, pp.

100 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Lim, T. K., Rita, M., Ooi, P. A. C. and Chin, Meriam M. Y. and Awang, A. 1998. The life C. L. 1988. Some entomopathogenic tables of cocoa pod borer fungi isolated from Conopomorpha Conopomorpha cramerella. Poster cramerella. Planter 64: 548-554. Session at Malaysian International Cocoa Conference, 26-27th November, Ling, A. H., Yew, C. C. and Koh, T. S. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1987. Experience in handling the cocoa pod borer outbreak in Peninsular Meyer, A. H. and van Hall, C. J. J. 1914. Malaysia, pp. 129-137. In: Management Tweede verslag van de Cacao-selectie of the Cocoa Pod Borer, P. A. C. Ooi, op Getas. Meded. Proefstat. Midden G. C. Luz, K. C. Khoo, C. H. Teoh, M. Java No. 17. Md. Jusoh, C. T. Ho and G. S. Lim Moersamdono and Wardojo, S. 1984. (Eds.), Malaysian Plant Protection Kemajuan dalam percobaan Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. perlindungan buah cokelat dengan Liu, S. K. 1964. Note on nine litchi flower kantung plastik dari serangan and fruit borers in Kwangtung Province Acrocercops cramerella Sn. Menara (in Chinese). Acta Entomol. Sin. 13: Perkebunan 52(4): 93-96. 145-158. (With a summary in English). Mohd. Shamsuddin, O. and Vijaysegaran, S. Loke, W. H. and Tan, C. L. 1994. Cross- 1983. A short report on cocoa pod mating of cocoa and rambutan borer Acrocercops cramerella Snellen Nephelium lappaceum populations of in Peninsular Malaysia. Fruit Branch in Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen), Leaflet No. 13 MARDI, Serdang, pp. 365-367. In: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Malaysia, 9 pp. Plant Prot. Trop., A. Rajan and Yusuf Muhamad, R., Tan, S. G., Gan, Y. Y., Rita, lbrahim (Eds.). Malaysian Plant S., Kanasar, S. and Asuan, K. 1989. An Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, electrophoretic study of natural Malaysia. populations of the cocoa pod borer, Loke, W. H., Mohd. Shamsudin, O. and Conopomorpha cramerella (Smellen) Zam, A. K. 1986. Occurrence and from Malaysia. Pertanika 12(1): 1-6. status of Acrocercops cramerella Mumford, J. D. 1980. Report of visit to Snellen in Peninsular, Malaysia, pp. Quoin Cocoa Estate (Tawau), Sabah to 265-276. In: Cocoa and Coconuts assess the cocoa moth situtation in that Progress and Outlook, E. Pushparajah vicinity. EMPA Cocoa Pod Borer and P. S. Chew (Eds.). Incorporated Research, Kota Kinabalu, 17 pp. Society of Planters, Kuala Lumpur, (Mimeographed) Malaysia. Mumford, J. D. 1986. Control of the cocoa Matlick, B. K. 1998. Machete technology pod borer Acrocercops cramerella, A what small cocoa farmers need- Review critical review, pp. 277-286. In: Cocoa of pod borer control methods by small and Coconuts Progress and Outlook, E. farmers in Indonesia. First International Pushparajah and P. S. Chew (Eds.). Workshop on Sustainable Cocoa Incorporated Society of Planters, Kuala Growing, 29 March – 3 April 1998, Lumpur, Malaysia. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Republic of Panama, Mumford, J. D. and Ho, S. H. 1988. Control 10 pp. of the cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha cramerella. Cocoa Growers Bulletin Matthysse, J. G. 1957. Research on No. 40, pp. 19-29. insecticidal control of Philippine crop pests. J. Econ Entomol. 50: 517-518. Nagaraja, H. 1984. Description of a new species of Trichogrammatoidea

101 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

(Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae), Malaysian Plant Prot. Soc. Newsl. 10: parasitic on the cacao pod borer in the 5-6. Philippines. Philippine Entomol. 6: 207- Ooi, P. A. C. 1986b. The Cocoa Pod Borer. 213. Biological Control Project (CPB-639) Nagaraja, H., Easaw, P. T., Vanialingam, T., 1985-1986. CAB International Institute Salvador, A., Nunez, I. R. and Galbizo, of Biological Control. (Unpublished T. C. 1983. An egg parasite of the report). cocoa pod borer Acrocercops Ooi, P. A. C. 1987. Advances in the cramerella (Snellen) recorded in the biological control of cocoa pod borer, Philippines. Planter 59: 355-357. pp. 103-117. In: Management of the Nagaraja, H., Wordojo, S., Reyes, T. M., Cocoa Pod Borer, P. A. C. Ooi, G. C. Easaw, P. T. and Vanialingam, T. Luz, K. C. Khoo, C. H. Teoh, M. Md. 1985a. Record of an egg parasite of Jusoh, C. T. Ho and G. S. Lim (Eds.), cacao pod borer in Indonesia. The Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Planter 61: 469-472. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Nagaraja, H., Reyes, T. M. and Ooi, P. A. C. 1992. Prospects for biological Vanialingam, T. 1985b. Biological control of cocoa insect pests, pp. 101- control trials on the cocoa pod borer in 107. In: Cocoa Pest and Disease the Philippines, pp. 315-329. In: Management in Southeast Asia and Biological Control in the Tropical, M. Australia, P. J. Keane and C. A. J. Y. Hussein and A. G. Ibrahim (Eds.). Putter (Eds.). FAO Plant Prod. Prot. Univ. Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, 516 Pap. No. 112, FAO, Rome. pp. Ooi, P. A. C. and Mah, Y. L. 1985. Ng, K. Y. 1986. Cocoa pod borer Collecting bud and fruitboring management in Malaysia. Courier gracillariid pupae. Malaysian Plant Agrochem. 1186: 16-18. Prot. Soc. Newsl. 9(4): 4-5. Ngim, C. K., Ho, S. H., Ooi, P. A. C., Lim, Ooi, P. A. C., Day, R. K. and Mumford, J. G. S. and Teng, P. S. 1992.Control of D. 1990. Evolution of the cocoa pod the cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha borer. Malaysian Plant Prot. Soc. cramerella with lambdacyhalothrin, pp. Newsl. 14(3): 37-38. 82-89. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Plant Otanes, F. Q. 1937. Notes on a cacao pod Prot. Trop., No. 2. 20-23 March 1990, borer moth Acrocercops cramerella Genting Highlands, Malaysia, Snell. Philippine J. Agric. 7: 419-424. Noyes, J. S. 1991. A new species of Paerels, J. J. 1924. Overzicht over de Ooencyrtus (Hymenoptera; Encyrtidae) voornaamste ziekten en plagen van den from Malaysia, a prepupal parasitoid of cacaoboom op Java - A survey of the the cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha principal diseases and pests of the cocoa cramerella (Snellen) (Lepidoptera: tree in Java. Tijdschr Plantenziekten 3: Gracillariidae). J. Nat. Hist. 25(6): 51-61. 1617-1622. Pang, T. C. and Ooi, S. T. 1981. The Ooi, P. A. C. 1985. Cocoa pod borer outbreak of cocoa pod borer, project annual report (September 1984 - Acrocercops cramerella Sn. in Sabah, August 1985). Commonwealth Institute Malaysia. Bull. Soc. Agric. Scientist, of Biological Control (mimeo). Sabah 4: 1-14. Ooi, P. A. C. 1986a. Food plants of Pang, T. C., Ooi, S. T., Lim, G. T. and Sim, Conopomorpha cramerella Snellen. C. H. 1981. Current research and

102 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

present status of the cocoa pod borer in parasites in general). Meded. Proefstat. Sabah, pp. 69-77. In: Proc. Dept. Agric. Midden Java 5: 1-21. Biennial Conference . Dept. Agric. Roepke, W. 1912d.Over den huidigen stand Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. van het vraagstuk van het rampassen als Pardede, D. 1988. Tindakan untuk bestrijdings middel tegen de Cacao mot mempertahankan kakao tetap bebas dari op Java. On the present position of the hama kakaomot di Sumatera utara. problem of "rampassen" as a method of Measures to maintain cocoa plantations combating the cacao moth in Java. in North Sumatra free from cocoa moth. Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java 8: 1-21. Bull. Perkebunan 19: 21-26. Roepke, W. 1913a. Nieuwe onderzo- Parnata, Y. and Pardede, D. 1979. Suatu ekingen omtrent de parasieten van de pandangan retrospektif mengenai cacaomot. Meded. Proefstat. Midden permasalahan hama kakaomot di Java 12: 1-21. Sumatera Utara. A retrospective view of the cocoa-moth pest problem in North Sumatra. Bulletin Balai Penelitian Perkebunan Medan 10: 57-64. Pickett, C. H.,Wilson, L. T., Flaherty, D. L. and Gonzalez, D. 1989. Measuring the host preference of parasites, an aid in evaluating biotypes of Anagrus epos Girault (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae). Entomophaga 34: 551-558. Rita, M. and Tan, S. G. 1987. Biochemical taxonomy of the cocoa pod borer: a prospective view, pp. 119-126. In: Management of the Cocoa Pod Borer, P. A. C. Ooi, G. C. Luz, K. C. Khoo, C. H. Teoh, M. Md. Jusoh, C. T. Ho and G. S. Lim (Eds.), Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Roepke, W. 1912a. Voorloopige mededeeling omtrent het optreden van mot in verschillende typen van den Diati Roenggo cacao. Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java 3: 1-3. Roepke, W. 1912b. Enkele biologische opmerkingen betreffende de levenswijze van het motrupsje en motvlindertje. Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java 3: 4-8. Roepke, W. 1912c. De nieuwe parasieten van het Cacao motie en iets over parasieten in het algemeen. (The new parasites of the cocoa moth and on

103 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Roepke, W. 1913b.Verslag van het Ruf, F., Yoddang, and Lancon F. 2004. Pod Rampascongres gehouden door het borer and pesticides.From slash and Proefstation Midden Java te Salatiga burn to replanting green revolutions in den 17den en 18den Januri 1913 Meded. the Indonesian Uplands, F. Ruf (Ed.). Proefstat. Midden Java 11: 1-38. World Bank, Washington, USA, pp. 147-172. Roepke, W. 1914a.Wetenschappelijik Onderzoek. (Scientific researches.) Saahlan, R. M., Muhamad, R., Tan, S. G., Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java, Batavia Gan, Y. Y., and Ahmad, H. 1985. 18: 14-23. Biological polymorphisms of peptidase and alpha-GPDH in natural populations Roepke, W. 1914b.De Praktische of the cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha Toepassing der Motparasieten. The cramerella Snellen. J. Plant Prot. Trop. practical employment of the cacao moth 2(1): 49-52. parasite. Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java, Batavia 18: 25-27. Schotman, C. Y. L. 1989. Plant pests of quarantine importance to the Caribbean. Roepke, W. 1915. Verslag over het jaar RLAC-PROVEG 21. Port of Spain, 1914-1915 en Werkprogramma voor het Trinidad and Tobago: Caribbean Plant jaar 1915-1916 (Report for the year Protection Commission. 1914-1915 and program for the year 1915-1916). Meded. Proefstat. Midden See, Y. A. and Khoo, K. C. 1996. Influence Java, Batavia. 20: 30. of Dolichoderus thoracicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on cocoa Roepke, W. 1916. Wetenschappelik pod damage by Conopomorpha Onderzoek. Scientific Research. Meded. cramerella (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae) Proefstat. Midden Java, Batavia 23: 16- in Malaysia. Bull. Entomol. Res. 86: 29. 467-474. Roepke, W. 1917. Verslag over het Jaar Shah, S. 1978. Bionomics and control of 1916-17 (Report on the Year 1916- some lesser known insect pests of cocoa 1917). Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java, in Sabah, pp. 295-307. In: Proc. Int. Salatiga 28: 10-33. Conf. Cocoa and Coconuts, June 21- Roepke, W. 1918. Entomologische 24, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 766 pp. Onderzoekingen. (Entomological Shah, S. 1987. Cultural and physical control Research). (Report for 1917-1918). of the cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha Meded. Proefstat. Midden Java, cramerella (Snell.) (Lepidoptera: Salatiga 32: 13-14. Gracillariidae), pp. 43-51. In: Roepke, W. 1993. Rampasan, pp. 56-58. Management of the Cocoa Pod Borer, In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Cocoa P. A. C. Ooi, G. C. Luz, K. C. Khoo, C. Economy, Bali-Theobroma, Indonesia. H. Teoh, M. Md. Jusoh, C. T. Ho and Ron, A. G. 1985. Pest status of cocoa. G. S. Lim (Eds.), Malaysian Plant Annual report of the Research Branch, Protection Society, Kuala Lumpur, Department of Agriculture, for the year Malaysia. 1983, p. 72. Sarawak, Ministry of Sharma, D. D. 1985. Major pests of litchi in Agriculture and Community Bihar. Indian Farm. 35: 25-26. Development, Malaysia. Sharma, D. D. and Lall, B. S. 1983. Ruf, F. 1993. Indonesia: a possible world Comparative toxicity of insecticides to leader in cocoa production. pp. 64-74. Acrocercops cramerella Snellen In: Proc. Internat. Conf. Cocoa (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae). Indian J. Economy, Bali -Theobroma, Indonesia. Agric. Sci. 53: 187-188.

104 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Sidhu, M. S. 1984. Preliminary Singh, H. 1977. A note on the control of investigations into the chemical control litchi leaf miner, Acrocercops of the cocoa moth pod borer cramerella Snell. (Lepidoptera: Acrocercops cramerella Snellen, in Gracillariidae). Progr. Hort. 9: 53-56. Sabah. Planter 60: 228-242. Singh, H. 1978. Pest complex of litchi in Sidhu, M. S. 1985. Management of the Dehradun and Saharanpur districts of cocoa pod borer with selective branch Uttar Pradesh. Indian J. Entomol. 4(4): and pod in small holding in Sabah. J. 464. Plant Prot. Trop. 2(1): 1-8. Situmorang, S. 1971.Usaha pemberantasan Sidhu, M. S., Lim, R. K. H. and Lee, S. L. cacao mot pada tjoklat. Measures for 1983. A preliminary investigation into controlling the cacao moth in cacao the efficacy of insecticides and their plantings. Budidaja kopi – tjoklat 3, 10 selective application against the cocoa pp. Komisi Tehnis Perkebunan. moth Acrocercops cramerella Snell. in Situmorang, S. 1974. Ngengat cokelat Sabah. MAPPS Newsl. 7: 5-6. Acrocercops cramerella pada cokelat. Sidhu, M. S., Sim, C. H. and Johnny, K. V. Menara Perk. 42: 195-197. (In Bahasa 1987. Practical aspects of chemical Indonesia). spraying for cocoa pod borer Smith, E. S. C. 1981. An integrated control management in Sabah, pp. 19-40. In: scheme for cocoa pests and diseases in Symposium on Management of Cocoa Papua New Guinea. Trop. Pest Manag. Pod Borer. Malaysian Plant Protection 27: 351-359. Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Snellen, P. C. T. 1904. Over de Silayan, H. S. 1938. Annual report of the ontwikkelingstoestanden van eenige director of plant industry for the fiscal Microlepidoptera van Java. About the year ending December 31, 1937. development stages of some Manila, Philippine Dep. Agric. Comm., Microlepidoptera in Java. Tijschrift 182 pp. voor Entomologie 46: 79-90. Sim, C. H. 1984. Some aspects of the Soberanis, W., Ríos, R., Arevalo, E., control measures on cocoa pod borer Zuniga, L., Cabezas, O. and Krauss, U. Acrocercops cramerella. Dept. of 1999. Increased frequency of Agriculture, Sabah, 6 pp. (Mimeo). phytosanitary pod removal in cacao Sim, C. H. 1986a. A preliminary study of Theobroma cacao increases yield insecticide resistance in population of economically in eastern Peru. Crop cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha Prot. 18: 677-685. cramerella (Snellen). MAPPS Newsl. 9: Sulistyowati, E. and Yunianto, Y. D. 1995. 3. Inventarisasi musuh alami hama Sim, C. H. 1986b. An investigation on the penggerek buah kakao (PBK), chemical control of cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella Snell. Di Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen), Provinsi Maluku. Inventory of natural pp. 121-122. In: Proc. 2nd. Int. Conf. enemies of cocoa pod borer (CPB), PIant Prot. Trop. (Extended Abstracts). Conopomorpha cramerella (Snell.) in Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Maluku. Pelita Perkebunan 11(2): 76- Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 89. Sim, C. H. 1988. Evaluation of deltamethrin Sulistyowati, E., Wardani, S., Wiryadiputra, and some other synthetic pyrethroids S., Winarno, H. and Atmawinata, O. against the cocoa pod borer. J. Plant 1995. Keefektifan beberapa jenis Prot. Trop. 5(2): 93-97. insektisida terhadap hama penggerek

105 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

buah kakao, Conopomorpha cramerella cocoa industry in Malaysia, Kuala (Snell.) Effectiveness of several Lumpur, Preprint 13 pp. insecticides for controlling cocoa pod Toxopeus, H. and Giesberger, G. 1983. borer, Conopomorpha cramerella History of cocoa and cocoa research in (Snell.). Pelita Perkebunan 11(2): 90- Indonesia. Archives on Cocoa Research 105. 2: 7-34. Szent-lvany, J. J. H. 1961. Insect pests of Tropical Development and Research the Theobroma cacao in the territory of Institute, 1986. Combating the cacao Papua and New Guinea. Papua New pod borer. TDRI Newsl. No. 9. Guinea Agric. J. 13: 127-147. Uichanco, L. B. 1936. Miscellaneous notes Tan, C. L. 1986. Acrocercops spp. on locusts, agriculture and people in (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) and their Mindanao. Philipp. Agric. 25: 565-588. parasitoids in Peninsular Malaysia, pp. 118-120. In: Proc. 2nd. Int. Conf. Plant. van Achterberg, C. 1989. Four new genera Prot. Trop. (Extended Abstract), of Braconinae and Rogadinae from the Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Oriental Region (Hymenoptera: Kuala Lumpur. Braconidae). Zool. Mededelingen 63: 79-95. Tan, S. G., Muhamad, R., Gan, Y. Y. and Rita, S. 1988. Hexokinase, malate van der Knapp, W. P. 1993. The influence dehydrogenase, fluorescent esterase and of rampasan and stripping on the malic enzyme polymorphisms in the production of cocoa trees, pp. 59-61. In: cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha Proc. Int. Conf. Cocoa Economy, Bali- cramerella (Snellen). Pertanika 11(1): Theobroma, Indonesia. 7-13. van Hall, C. J. J. 1919. Zickten en Plagen Tay, E. B. 1983. Cocoa pod borer der Cultuurgewassen in Nederlandsch Acrocercops cramerella and its control, Indie in 1918. Disease and pests of pp. 89-93. In: Proc. Dept. Agric. cultivated plants in the Dutch East Biennial Conference, Dept. Agric. Indies in 1918. Meded. Laboratorium Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. voor Plantenziekten, Buitenzorg No. 36, 49 pp. Tay, E. B. 1987. Control of cocoa pod borer, the Sabah experience, pp.7-17. In: Proc. van Hall, C. J. J. 1920. Ziekten en Plagen Symp. Manag. Cocoa Pod Borer, der Cultuurgewassen in Nederlandsch Malaysian Plant Protection Society, Indie in 1919. Diseases and Pests of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Cultivated Plants in the Dutch East Indies in 1919. Meded. Inst. Tay, E. B. 1990. Cocoa pod borer research Plantenziekten, Buitenzorg No. 39, 50 and management. Dept. Agric., Kota pp. Kinabalu, Sabah, pp. 93-104. van Hall, C. J. J. 1923. Ziekten en Plagen Tay, E. B. and Sim, C. H. 1989. Field der Cultuurgewassen in Nederlandsch- evaluation of a synthetic pheromone for Indie in 1922. Diseases and Pests of the control of cocoa pod borer Cultivated Plants in the Dutch East Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen). Indies in 1922. Meded. Inst. MAPPS Newsl. 13(2): 25-28. Plantenziekten, Buitenzorg No. 58, 42 Tay, E. B., Bong, C. L. and Lim, G. T. pp. 1983. Pests and diseases in cocoa van Hall, C. J. J. 1925. Ziekten en Plagen cultivation. Seminar on recent der Cultuurge-wassen in Nederlandsch development and future prospects of the Indie in 1924. Disease and Pests of

106 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Cultivated Plants in the Dutch East development. Indonesian Agric. Res. Indies in 1924. Meded. Inst. Dev. J. 2: 1-4. Plantenziekten, Buitenzorg No. 67, 53 Wardojo, S. 1980b. Research and control pp. strategies of the cocoa pod borer. van Hall, C. J. J. 1926. Ziekten en Plagen Konferensi Nasional Coklat, Medan, der Cultuurge-wassen in Nederlandsch- Indonesia. Indie in 1925. Diseases and Pests of Wardojo, S. 1981a. Strategies for research Cultivated Plants in the Dutch East and control of the cocoa pod borer. Indies in 1925. Meded. Inst. Menara Perkebunan 49(3): 69-74. Plantenziekten, Buitenzorg No. 70, 51 pp. Wardojo, S. 1981b. Metoda pengamatan penggerek buah cokelat. Menara van Heurn, W. C. 1932. Waarnemingen Perkebunan 49: 159-161. (In Bahasa betreffende een Parasiet van het Cacao Indonesia). Motje. Observations on a Parasite of the Cacao Moth. Ent. Ber. Ned. Ent. Wardojo, S. 1984a. Kemungkinan Vereen, The Hague No. 122, pp. 26-27. pembebasan Maluku Utara daripada masalah penggerek buah cokelat, Vanialingam Thomas, E., Irshad, M., Acrocercops cramerella Sn. Menara Manalo, J. and Cruz, P. 1982. Early Perkebunan 52: 57-64. work in the control of the cocoa pod borer Acrocercops cramerella in the Wardojo, S. 1984b. Masalah hama dalam Philippines, pp.345-351. In: Proc. 8th kemarau panjang. Menara Perkebunan Int. Cocoa Res. Conf. 1982. Cocoa 52: 143-147. Producers' Alliance, Lagosia, Nigeria. Wardojo, S. 1992. Major pests and diseases Viado, G. B., Orillo, F. T., Basio, D. G. and of cocoa in Indonesia, pp. 63-67. In: Valdez, R. B. 1956. Six combination Cocoa Pest and Disease Management sprays in the control of insect pests and in Southeast Asia and Australasia, P. J. diseases of cacao. Philippine Agric. 40: Keane and C. A. I. Putter (Eds.). FAO 129-134. Plant Prod. Prot. Pap. No. 112, FAO, Rome. Waage, J., Vos, J., Krauss, U. and Williamson, S. 2000. Farmer- Wardojo, S. and Moersamdono, 1984. participartory, biological approaches, Kantung plastik untuk melindungi buah the key to sustainable cocoa production. cokelat dari serangan Acrocercops Paper presented at the ICCO Consultive cramerella Snellen. Menara Group on Cocoa Economy Meeting in Perkebunan 52: 77-83. Santo Domingo, 10-14 April, Waterhouse, D. F. 1993. The major Dominican Republic. pests and weeds of Wakamura, S., Awang, A. and Tay, E. B. agriculture in Southeast Asia. ACIAR 1994. Communication disruption in the Monograph No. 21, v + 141 pp. cocoa pod borer with synthetic sex Way, M. J. and Khoo, K. C. 1989. pheromone in cocoa field in Sabah, Relationships between Helopeltis Malaysia. Abstract for 38th Annual theobromae damage and ants with Meeting of Japanese Society of Applied special reference to Malaysian cocoa Entomology and Zoology, 20-31 smallholdings. J. Plant Prot. Trop. 6: 1- March, Tokyo, Japan. 11. Wardojo, S. 1980a. The cocoa pod borer Way, M. J. and Khoo, K. C. 1991. Colony moth - a major hindrance to cocoa dispersion and nesting habits of the ants Dolichoderus thoracicus and

107 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Internat. Seminar. 16-17 October 2000, Formicidae), in relation to their success Kota Kinabalu Sabah, Malaysia. as biological control agents on cocoa. Wong, Y. and Kuang, L. 2001. Preliminary Bull. Entomol. Res. 81: 341-350. results of cocoa pod borer Way, M. J. and Khoo, K. C. 1992. Role of Conopomorpha cramerella by black ants in pest management. Ann. Rev. cocoa ant Dolichoderus sp. in Teck Entomol. 37: 479-503. Guan Cocoa Estate, Tawau, pp. 44-49. In: Proc. Incoped 3rd Internat. Wellensiek, S. J. and de Haan, J. Th. 1932. Seminar. 16-17 October, Kota Kinabalu Onderzoekingen over cacao-selectie in Sabah, Malaysia. 1930 en 1931. Investigations on cacao selections in 1930 and 1931. Archief Wood, B. J. 1980. The cocoa pod borer voor de koffiecultuur 6: 103-145. moth in Malaysia. Perak Planters Assoc. J., pp. 28-36. Wessel, P. C. 1983. The cocoa pod borer moth Acrocercops cramerella Sn. Wood, B. J. 1983. Cocoa pests, Review of research in Indonesia 1900- surveillance, census system, and cocoa 1918. Archives Cocoa Res. 2: 35-62. moth: 153-194. In: Towards Better Agronomic Practices, Quality and Wessel, P. C. 1993. The cocoa pod borer Processing of Cocoa (Ebor-Aid). moth Review of research in Indonesia Advisory and Inf. Doc. FD-83-1. Agri- (1900-1918). pp. 42-47. In: Proc. Int. Bio Corp. Sdn. Bhd., Batu Tiga. Conf. Cocoa Economy, Bali – (Mimeographed). Theobroma, Indonesia. Wood, B. J. 1987. Prospects for the Whipp, A. P. G. and Wong, P. W. 1986. management of the cocoa pod borer in Conopomorpha cramerella, the cocoa Malaysia, pp. 139-165. In: Management moth pod borer, A review of the current of the Cocoa Pod Borer, P. A. C. Ooi, knowledge of the pest with particular G. C. Luz, K. C. Khoo, C. H. Teoh, M. reference to its control with Md. Jusoh, C. T. Ho and G. S. Lim deltamethrin in Sabah, Malaysia, pp. (Eds.), Malaysian Plant Protection 123-124. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. PIant Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Prot. Trop. (Extended Abstract). Malaysian Plant Protection Society Wood, B. J. and Chung, C. F. 1989. Malaysian, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Integrated management of insect pests of cocoa in Malaysia. Planter 65: 389- Willson, K. 1999. Coffee, cocoa and tea. 418. Also produced in Cocoa Pest and Crop Prod. Sci. Hort. No. 8. CABI Disease Management in Southeast Asia Publishing, Wallingford, UK. and Australasia, P. J. Keane and C. A. Wiryadiputra, S. 1998. Kajian ras fisiologis J. Putter (Eds.). FAO Plant Prod. Prot. dan inang pengganti penggerek buah Pap. No. 112, FAO, Rome, pp. 45-62. kakao di Indonesia (Studies on Wood, B. J., Fee, C. G., Cheong, S. S. and physiological race and alternate hosts of Foh, C. C. 1992. Trials on control of the cocoa pod borer in Indonesia). Laporan cocoa pod borer Conopomorpha Proyek Penelitian PHT Tanaman cramerella (Snellen) in Sabah by Perkebunan di Jember, Indonesia, pp. regular complete harvesting. Trop. Pest 12-19. Manag. 38(3): 271-278. Wiryadiputra, S. 2001. The use of Wood, G. A. R. 1980. The cocoa pod borer entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria - a menace to South East Asia. Cocoa bassiana to control cocoa pod borer Growers Bull. No. 30, pp. 25-27. Conopomorpha cramerella in the Field, pp. 27-32. In: Proc. Incoped 3rd

108 Cord 2006, 22 (1)

Wood, G. A. R. and Lass, R. H. 1985. Zehntner, L. 1901a. Een nieuwe Cocoa. 4th Edition. Tropical Agric, voedsterplant van de cacaomot Series, Longmans, London and New (voorloopige mededeeling). DeNieuwe York, 620 pp. Gids. 3: 1014-1017. Wurth, Th. 1909. De mottenplaag bij de Zehntner, L. 1901b. Over eenige cacao en, het rampassen. Cultuurgids insectenplagen bij cacaocult uur op 11: 164. Java. De Nieuwe Gids. 3: 567-572. Yen, Y. P., Lin, S. G. and Suen, M. F. 1992. Zehntner, L. 1902. Rapport over de Synthesis of the sex pheromone of werkzaamheden. Korte Meded. Proefst. cocoa pod borer moth Conopomorpha Cacao, pp. 2-3. cramerella. Synth. Community 22: Zehntner, L. 1903a. Rapport over de 1567-1581. werkzaamheden. Korte Meded. Proefst. Yew, C. C., Chung, G. F., Ho, C. T., Leong, Cacao, pp. 8-9. C. W. and Liau, S. S. 1992. Experiences Zehntner, L. 1903b. Rapport over de in the management of cocoa pod borer mottenbestrijding op de onderneming Conopomorpha cramerella (Snellen) banaran 1901-1902. Prodfst. V. Cacao. infestations in some Malaysian cocoa Salatiga Bull. 5: 1-53. growers’ council member estates of peninsular Malaysia. Planter 68(798): 445-455.

Yong, H. S., Rosni Sarjan and Ooi, P. A. C. 1987. Allozyme variation in the cocoa pod borer, Conopomorpha cramerella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), from different host plants. Malaysian J. Sci. 9: 17-31. Yunu, A. and Balasubramaniam, A. 1975. Major crop pests in Peninsular Malaysia. Min. Agric. Malaysia, 190 pp. Zam, A. K. and Azhar, I. 1992.Cocoa pod borer on the move. MAPPS Newsl. 16(4): 35-36. Zam, A. K. and Thiagarajan, R. 1985. Laporan lawatan ke Sabah mengenai Pengorek Buah Koko Acrocercops cramerella (Snellen), 21-24 Nov. 1984. Report of visit to Sabah concerning cocoa pod borer. Crop. Prot. Branch, Dept. of Agriculture, Kuala Lumpur, 14 pp. (In Bahasa Malaysia). (Mimeographed).

109