Maintaining and Building Relationships Between the Local Authority with Existing and Emerging Academies and Free Schools
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Agenda Item: 5E Wolverhampton City Council OPEN EXECUTIVE DECISION ITEM (AMBER) CABINET Date 22 MAY 2013 Portfolio COUNCILLOR P PAGE (SCHOOLS, SKILLS AND LEARNING) Originating Service Group(s) DELIVERY- GOVERNANCE Contact Officer(s)/ CHERYL POWELL Key Decision: No Forward Plan: No Telephone Number(s) 01902 558653 Title/Subject Matter MAINTAINING AND BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE LOCAL AUTHORITY WITH EXISTING AND EMERGING ACADEMIES AND FREE SCHOOLS. 1.0 Recommendations 1.1. That the report of the maintaining and building relationships between the local authority with existing and emerging academies and free schools scrutiny review group attached at Appendix 1 be received and the following recommendations from the review be agreed:- R1 Collaborative working must continue to be a key focus. Wolverhampton City Council aspires that all academies, schools and free schools sign up to the Wolverhampton School Improvement Partnership (WSIP) • The review recognises the value of collaborative working especially through the role of the WSIP. Appropriate budget provision must be allocated. R2 Vulnerable schools which might be targeted to become academies should be identified earlier and interventions should be in place to address failings R3 Consideration of new / alternative models of education should be undertaken (not to view the Academy model as the only model). • Alternative organisational structures should be considered, for example when a Head Teacher’s post becomes vacant the school’s governing body should be advised that a Head Teacher (substantive) post is not the only model available. R4 Wolverhampton City Council must encourage local, education specific, sponsors. • Evidence shows that local solutions have been successful and should be sought before using external sponsors. R5 Wolverhampton City Council will work towards all academies, schools and free schools signing up to the local authority’s admissions policy Page | 1 R6 Wolverhampton City Council will work towards all schools including academies and free schools signing up to a local authority Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that seeks to cement a strong relationship between academies and the local authority. • That the TUC’s Model Agreement for Academies be considered as an appendix to a MoU and that all academies, schools and free schools are signatories R7 All academies, schools and free schools should have mechanisms in place to promote capacity building and staff development for the Senior Leadership Team and to promote continuity of good practice. • Evidence shows that succession planning is a key element to maintaining school improvement. R8 Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are reviewed to ensure they are appropriate to the needs of academies, schools and free schools. • That the Scrutiny Board consider an evaluation of the current stream of SLAs as a stand-alone scrutiny review R9 The Governor Support Service to produce separate documentation that details the factors that need to be considered when a school chooses to become an academy. • Other models and options should be illustrated within a Governors’ handbook / information pack 1.2. That the Cabinet response to the review recommendations attached at Appendix 2 be approved. 1.3. That the Cabinet response be referred to Scrutiny Board to monitor the implementation of actions arising as a result of the recommendations Page | 2 2.0. Purpose 2.1. To bring to the attention of Cabinet the findings and recommendations of the maintaining and building relationships between the local authority with existing and emerging academies and free schools scrutiny review (Appendix 1) and to agree the Cabinet response. (Appendix 2) 3.0. Background 3.1. An away day seminar was convened for all councillors in order to ascertain relevant scrutiny reviews and inquiries for the 2012/2013 municipal year. Following on from this meeting, the outcomes were used to inform a report presented to Scrutiny Board on 4 July, 2012 listing details of the revised scrutiny work programme for 2012/13. 3.2. The Scrutiny Board approved the revised scrutiny review and inquiry work programme and one of the areas councillors decided to focus their efforts on was maintaining and building relationships between the local authority with existing and emerging Academies and Free Schools. 4.0. Messages from the Review 4.1. The education environment nationally and in Wolverhampton has changed and is continuing to change. The review group believes strongly that the local authority still has an important role to play in education in the city. Ultimately the local authority has a responsibility for the welfare, education and opportunities of all children and young people in the city and the review strongly supports the local authority’s efforts to ensure all schools, regardless of the type of school, provide the education opportunities that we expect for Wolverhampton’s children. 4.2. From the evidence provided throughout the review, it became apparent that Councillors need to be encouraged and supported to build better relationships with their local schools as this is beneficial to both parties. Becoming a school governor is not the only way for councillors to become involved in local schools and guidance should be provided about other ways of becoming involved. 4.3. The review group champions the wellbeing and opportunities for all children and young people in the city, regardless of which school they attend, and therefore requests that the local authority keep an overview of educational standards in the city. As part of this work there is a need to build relationships with all types of school in Wolverhampton including academies, community schools, faith schools, independent schools, as well as any new free schools. 5.0. Financial Implications 5.1. There are no direct financial implications arising from this report. [DM/25032013/U] 6.0. Legal Implications 6.1. There are no direct legal implications arising from this report. [JH/26032013/K] Page | 3 7.0. Equal Opportunities Implications 7.1. There are no direct equal opportunities implications arising from this report. 8.0. Environmental Implications 8.1. There will be no direct environmental implications arising from this report. Background papers: Listed at Appendix 6: Background Papers Page | 4 Appendix 1 Wolverhampton City Council Scrutiny Review: Maintaining and building relationships between the Local Authority with existing and emerging Academies and Free Schools. Final Report Review Group Councillors: Contact Officers: Councillor P Bedi Scrutiny Officer Cheryl Powell Councillor A Bolshaw (Chairman) Telephone Number 01902 558653 Councillor J Hodgkiss E‐Mail [email protected] Councillor L McGregor Councillor N A Patten Scrutiny Link Officer Tim Westwood Councillor R Whitehouse Telephone Number 01902 554100 E‐Mail [email protected] Co‐opted Members of the Review Group: Miss S Atim‐Uma Democratic Support Officer Martin Fox Miss H Scragg Telephone Number 01902 555047 Mrs R Watkins E‐Mail [email protected] 10 April 2013 Page | 5 Table of Contents: Page No: Chairman’s Foreword 7 1. Introduction: Academies – the local and national picture 8 Types of Academies: Old style sponsored academies 8 Types of Academies: New style sponsored academies 9 Free Schools 9 Academy Arrangements 11 2. Summary List of Recommendations 16 3. Background to the Review 18 4. Evidence to support the Recommendations 20 Collaborative Working 20 Maintaining School Improvement 21 Alternative Models of Education 22 Case Study 1: Hackney Learning Trust 23 Case Study 2: Camden Education Commission 24 Academy Sponsors 24 The Admissions Policy 25 Memorandum of Understanding 26 Staff Development and Capacity Building 27 Service Level Agreements 28 Governor Support Service 29 5. Conclusions 30 Appendix 1: Scrutiny Review Group Membership 31 Appendix 2: Witness List (verbal & written evidence) 32 Appendix 3: Partnership Working (Draft Proposal) 33 Appendix 4: Example Memorandum of Understanding 37 Appendix 5: Glossary of Terms 40 Appendix 6: Background papers 41 Page | 6 Chairman’s Foreword The government sponsored academies and free schools movement is arguably the most important change to the education of the nation’s children since the compulsory education laws of the 1880s. In my opinion, only the move away from selection at age 11 and the tripartite system, in favour of comprehensive education, was of parallel importance. The academies programme is controversial and has had a profound effect on the educational landscape. Detractors continue to attack the programme, which is said to be, damaging to the schools and communities around them, selective in nature, forced on parents who do not want it, and represents a move towards the privatisation of education by stealth. Additionally, the movement of government grant from councils directly to academies and free schools has caused a fragmentation in local authority provision. Nevertheless, some important responsibilities continue to remain with the local authority such as monitoring special needs provision and other associated areas, for example, educational psychology. Additionally, local authorities have a duty to monitor standards but have to do this with diminishing staffing and support, with reduced rights of access to academies. Proponents argue that the greater freedoms afforded to academies have driven up academic standards. However, comparing the performance of even a small number of academies is fraught with complexities. The scholarly