DOCSLIB.ORG

COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUDAN COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response 11 October 2020 CONFIRMED CASES by state NO. OF ACTIVITIES by Organization as of 11 October 2020 13,691 International boundary IOM 912 State boundary UNHCR 234 Confirmed cases Undetermined boundary Save the children 193 Abyei PCA Area Red Sea ECDO 150 385 UNFPA 135 Number of confirmed cases RIVER RED SEA 836 6,764 NILE Plan International Sudan 39 Welthungerhilfe (WHH) 34 Deaths Recovered 391 438 WHO 23 NORTHERN HOPE 22 HIGHLIGHTS 146 NCA 20 9,841 The Federal Ministry of Health identified the first case of COVID-19 on 12 March WVI 19 OXFAM 12 2020. United Nations organisations and their partners created a Corona Virus 228 NADA Alazhar 12 Country Preparedness and Response Plan (CPRP) to support the Government. EMERGENCY NGO Sudan 12 NORTH DARFUR KHARTOUM On 14 March 2020, the Government approved measures to prevent the spread of KASSALA EMERGENCY 12 Khartoum the virus which included reducing congestion in workplaces, closing schools 1,137 TGH 11 By Organization Type: NORTH KORDOFAN and banning large public gatherings. From 8 July 2020, the Government started AL GEZIRA World Vision Sudan 11 GEDAREF NORWEGIAN 9 174 7 WEST REFUGEE COUNCIL to ease the lock-down in Khartoum State. The nationwide curfew was changed 203 (9.33%) (0.38%) DARFUR WHITE 274 Italian Agency 7 from 6:00 pm to 5:00 am and bridges in the capital were re-opened. Travelling Development Co. NGO Governmental 34 NILE 243 Near East Foundation 7 between Khartoum and other states is still not allowed and airports will 191 SENNAR CAFOD 6 CENTRAL WEST gradually open pending further instructions from the Civil Aviation Authority. GIZ 5 DARFUR 39 KORDOFAN Schools and universities will remain closed. Work at Government institutions 6 30 IRW 4 413 1,270 started on 12 July, at 50 per cent capacity. By 11 October, the number of 69 SOUTH NRC 3 (22.16%) (68.13%) INGO UN SOUTH EAST KORDOFAN BLUE NILE ZOA 2 confirmed cases had increased to 13,691. This increase is attributed mainly to DARFUR DARFUR 15 local transmission of cases. 21 Abyei PCA* NO. OF ACTIVITIES by State as of 11 October 2020 CONTAINMENT MEASURES AND BORDERS CLOSURE * Permanent Court of Arbitration Source: Directorate-General of Emergency and Epidemic Control, FMOH Khartoum 464 North Darfur 226 NUMBER OF CONFIRMED CASES per week West Kordofan 198 West Darfur 170 Confirmed cases Deaths Red Sea 2,885 2,846 3,000 South Kordofan 116 RED SEA 2,500 White Nile 102 NORTHERN 1,846 2,000 1,639 East Darfur 75 1,500 1,195 Gedaref 67 RIVER NILE 913 744 1,000 596 Red Sea 65 410 346 NORTH DARFUR KHARTOUM 201 189 South Darfur 56 KASSALA 500 25 3 66 117 81 67 51 20 118 Khartoum 7 2 26 13 0 Abyei PCA 54 NORTH KORDOFAN 0 AL GEZIRA WEST 14 - 31 1 - 15 16 - 30 1 - 15 16 - 31 1 - 15 16 - 30 1 to 15 16 to 31 1 to 15 16 to 31 1 to 15 16 to 30 DARFUR Central Darfur 50 GEDAREF Mar Apr Apr May May Jun Jun Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Northern 46 CENTRAL WHITE SENNAR International boundary DARFUR NILE WEST State boundary Blue Nile 35 KORDOFAN SOUTH BLUE NILE Undetermined boundary Kassala 32 SOUTH PREPARDNESS AND RESPONSE as of 11 October 2020 EAST KORDOFAN DARFUR DARFUR Abyei PCA Area North Kordofan 14 Country capital Abyei Al Gezira 9 PCA Border crossing point (closed) 1,864 26 124 2,264 Sennar 9 Airport closed No. of activities No. of organizations Implementing partners Health care workers trained River Nile 9 Containment measures The depiction and use of boundaries, geographic names and related data shown on the maps and included in the graphics are not warranted to be error free nor do they necessarily imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Creation date: 11 October 2020 Sources: International boundary (UN cartography), State boundary (CBS, FGC, NIC), River & Crossing border (WFP), Settlements (OCHA) Feedback: [email protected] | www.unocha.org/sudan | www.reliefweb.int | For the latest figures, information and interactive dashboard visit www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/sudan/covid-19.
Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights

    Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights

    Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 UNICEF and partners assess damage to communities in southern Khartoum. Sudan was significantly affected by heavy flooding this summer, destroying many homes and displacing families. @RESPECTMEDIA PlPl Reporting Period: July-September 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Flash floods in several states and heavy rains in upriver countries caused the White and Blue Nile rivers to overflow, damaging households and in- 5.39 million frastructure. Almost 850,000 people have been directly affected and children in need of could be multiplied ten-fold as water and mosquito borne diseases devel- humanitarian assistance op as flood waters recede. 9.3 million • All educational institutions have remained closed since March due to people in need COVID-19 and term realignments and are now due to open again on the 22 November. 1 million • Peace talks between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan Revolu- internally displaced children tionary Front concluded following an agreement in Juba signed on 3 Oc- tober. This has consolidated humanitarian access to the majority of the 1.8 million Jebel Mara region at the heart of Darfur. internally displaced people 379,355 South Sudanese child refugees 729,530 South Sudanese refugees (Sudan HNO 2020) UNICEF Appeal 2020 US $147.1 million Funding Status (in US$) Funds Fundi received, ng $60M gap, $70M Carry- forward, $17M *This table shows % progress towards key targets as well as % funding available for each sector. Funding available includes funds received in the current year and carry-over from the previous year. 1 Funding Overview and Partnerships UNICEF’s 2020 Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) appeal for Sudan requires US$147.11 million to address the new and protracted needs of the afflicted population.
  • “Kankasha” in Kassala: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study of the Clinical Characteristics, Epidemiology, Genetic Origi

    “Kankasha” in Kassala: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study of the Clinical Characteristics, Epidemiology, Genetic Origi

    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.23.20199976; this version posted September 24, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license . 1 1 Title [216/250 characters] 2 “Kankasha” in Kassala: a prospective observational cohort study of the clinical characteristics, 3 epidemiology, genetic origin, and chronic impact of the 2018 epidemic of Chikungunya virus 4 infection in Kassala, Sudan 5 Short title: [66/70characters] 6 Understanding the 2018 Chikungunya virus epidemic in Eastern Sudan 7 8 Authors: Hilary Bower1*, Mubarak el Karsany2,3*, Abd Alhadi Adam Hussein4, Mubarak Ibrahim 9 Idriss5, Ma’aaza Abasher AlZain6, Mohamed Elamin Ahmed Alfakiyousif2, Rehab Mohamed2, Iman 10 Mahmoud2, Omer Albadri,7 Suha Abdulaziz Alnour Mahmoud10, Orwa Ibrahim Abdalla10, Mawahib 11 Eldigail2, Nuha Elagib2, Ulrike Arnold1, Bernardo Gutierrez8, Oliver G. Pybus8, Daniel P. Carter9, Steven 12 T. Pullan9, Shevin T. Jacob11, Tajeldin Mohammedein Abdallah4,10#, Benedict Gannon1# , Tom E. 13 Fletcher11# 14 * Equal first authors, # Equal senior authors 15 16 Authors’ affiliations 17 1. UK Public Health Rapid Support Team, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine/Public Health 18 England, London, United Kingdom 19 2. National Public Health Laboratory, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan 20 3. Karary University, Omdurman, Sudan 21 4. University of Kassala, Kassala, Sudan 22 5. Laboratory Division, Kassala State Ministry of Health, Kassala, Sudan 23 6. Communicable Disease Surveillance & Events Unit, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan 24 7.
  • Sudan Food Security Outlook Report

    Sudan Food Security Outlook Report

    SUDAN Food Security Outlook February to September 2019 Deteriorating macroeconomic conditions to drive high levels of acute food insecurity in 2019 KEY MESSAGES • Food security has seasonally improved with increased cereal Current food security outcomes, February 2019 availability following the November to February harvest. However, the macroeconomic situation remains very poor and is expected to further deteriorate throughout the projection period, and this will drive continued extremely high food and non-food prices. The negative impacts of high food prices will be somewhat mitigated by the fact that livestock prices and wage labor are also increasing, though overall purchasing power will remain below average. A higher number of households than is typical will face Crisis (IPC Phase 3) or worse outcomes through September. • Between June and September, the lean season in Sudan, Crisis (IPC Phase 3) outcomes are expected in parts of Red Sea, Kassala, Al Gadarif, Blue Nile, West Kordofan, North Kordofan, South Kordofan, and Greater Darfur. Of highest concern are the IDPs in SPLM-N controlled areas of South Kordofan and SPLA-AW controlled areas of Jebel Marra, who have been inaccessible for both assessments and food assistance deliveries. IDPs in these areas are expected to be in Source: FEWS NET FEWS NET classification is IPC-compatible. IPC-compatible analysis follows Emergency (IPC Phase 4) during the August-September peak key IPC protocols but does not necessarily reflect the consensus of national of the lean season. food security partners. • The June to September 2019 rainy season is forecasted to be above average. This is anticipated to lead to flooding in mid-2019 and increase the prevalence of waterborne disease.
  • SUDAN Situation Report Last Updated: 3 Oct 2019

    SUDAN Situation Report Last Updated: 3 Oct 2019

    SUDAN Situation Report Last updated: 3 Oct 2019 HIGHLIGHTS (3 Oct 2019) Humanitarian partners have developed a cholera readiness and response plan and are seeking US$ 20.3 million for the next three months. Number of suspected cholera cases continues to rise, with 226 cases—including eight deaths— reported in Blue Nile and Sennar states as of 30 September 2019. Federal Ministry of Health has requested Oral Summary of Sudan cholera response plan budget Cholera Vaccine (OCV) to target 1.6 million people in high risk areas of Blue Nile and Sennar states. Forecasts estimate up to 13,200 cholera cases in the next 6 months in high risk states of Sudan. KEY FIGURES FUNDING (2019) CONTACTS Paola Emerson 364,200 226 $1.1B $452.1M Head of Office People affected by Suspected cholera Required Received [email protected] floods cases j e r , Mary Keller d y n r r A Head, Monitoring and Reporting o 39% 17 2 S Progress [email protected] States affected by States with cholera floods (HAC & outbreak Partners) FTS: https://fts.unocha.org/appeal s/670/summary EMERGENCY RESPONSE (3 Oct 2019) Humanitarian Cholera Readiness and Response Plan The major disease outbreaks in Sudan for the past decades are grouped into three categories based on type of transmission: water-borne, vector-borne and vaccine-preventable diseases. This is mainly attributed to low access to and coverage of safe drinking water, and sanitation, environmental sanitation and low vaccination coverage; exacerbated by weak health and WASH infrastructures. The country experienced the worst flooding since 2015 creating favourable ground for emergence and aggravation of water-borne and vector-borne diseases such as cholera, dysentery, dengue fever, malaria, etc.
  • North Darfur II

    North Darfur II

    Darfur Humanitarian Profile Annexes: I. North Darfur II. South Darfur III. West Darfur Darfur Humanitarian Profile Annex I: North Darfur North Darfur Main Humanitarian Agencies Table 1.1: UN Agencies Table 1.2: International NGOs Table 1.3: National NGOs Intl. Natl. Vehicl Intl. Natl. Vehic Intl. Natl. Vehic Agency Sector staff staff* es** Agency Sector staff staff* les** Agency Sector staff staff les FAO 10 1 2 2 ACF 9 4 12 3 Al-Massar 0 1 0 Operations, Logistics, Camp IOM*** Management x x x GAA 1, 10 1 3 2 KSCS x x x OCHA 14 1 2 3 GOAL 2, 5, 8, 9 6 117 10 SECS x x x 2, 3, 7, UNDP*** 15 x x x ICRC 12, 13 6 20 4 SRC 1, 2 0 10 3 2, 4, 5, 6, UNFPA*** 5, 7 x x x IRC 9, 10, 11 1 5 4 SUDO 5, 7 0 2 0 Protection, Technical expertise for UNHCR*** site planning x x x MSF - B 5 5 10 0 Wadi Hawa 1 1 x 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, Oxfam - UNICEF 9 11, 12 4 5 4 GB 2, 3, 4 5 30 10 Total 1 14 3 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, UNJLC*** 17 x x x SC-UK 11, 12 5 27 8 Technical Spanish UNMAS*** advice x x x Red Cross 3, 4 1 0 1 UNSECOORD 16 1 1 1 DED*** x x x WFP 1, 9, 11 1 12 5 NRC*** x x x WHO 4, 5, 6 2 7 2 Total 34 224 42 Total 10 29 17 x = information unavailable at this time Sectors: 1) Food 2) Shelter/NFIs 3) Clean water 4) Sanitation 5) Primary Health Facilities *Programme and project staff only.
  • Soil and Oil

    Soil and Oil

    COALITION FOR INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR I NTERNATIONAL JUSTICE SOIL AND OIL: DIRTY BUSINESS IN SUDAN February 2006 Coalition for International Justice 529 14th Street, N.W. Suite 1187 Washington, D.C., 20045 www.cij.org February 2006 i COALITION FOR INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE COALITION FOR I NTERNATIONAL JUSTICE SOIL AND OIL: DIRTY BUSINESS IN SUDAN February 2006 Coalition for International Justice 529 14th Street, N.W. Suite 1187 Washington, D.C., 20045 www.cij.org February 2006 ii COALITION FOR INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE © 2006 by the Coalition for International Justice. All rights reserved. February 2006 iii COALITION FOR INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CIJ wishes to thank the individuals, Sudanese and not, who graciously contributed assistance and wisdom to the authors of this research. In particular, the authors would like to express special thanks to Evan Raymer and David Baines. February 2006 iv 25E 30E 35E SAUDI ARABIA ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT LIBYA Red Lake To To Nasser Hurghada Aswan Sea Wadi Halfa N u b i a n S aS D e s e r t ha ah raar a D De se es re tr t 20N N O R T H E R N R E D S E A 20N Kerma Port Sudan Dongola Nile Tokar Merowe Haiya El‘Atrun CHAD Atbara KaroraKarora RIVER ar Ed Damer ow i H NILE A d tb a a W Nile ra KHARTOUM KASSALA ERITREA NORTHERN Omdurman Kassala To Dese 15N KHARTOUM DARFUR NORTHERN 15N W W W GEZIRA h h KORDOFAN h i Wad Medani t e N i To le Gedaref Abéche Geneina GEDAREF Al Fasher Sinnar El Obeid Kosti Blu WESTERN Rabak e N i En Nahud le WHITE DARFUR SINNAR WESTERN NILE To Nyala Dese KORDOFAN SOUTHERN Ed Damazin Ed Da‘ein Al Fula KORDOFAN BLUE SOUTHERN Muglad Kadugli DARFUR NILE B a Paloich h 10N r e 10N l 'Arab UPPER NILE Abyei UNIT Y Malakal NORTHERN ETHIOPIA To B.A.G.
  • SUDAN Price Bulletin August 2021

    SUDAN Price Bulletin August 2021

    SUDAN Price Bulletin August 2021 The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) monitors trends in staple food prices in countries vulnerable to food insecurity. For each FEWS NET country and region, the Price Bulletin provides a set of charts showing monthly prices in the current marketing year in selected urban centers and allowing users to compare current trends with both five-year average prices, indicative of seasonal trends, and prices in the previous year. Sorghum, millet, and wheat are the most important food commodities in northern Sudan. Sorghum is the staple food for the majority of poor households in central and eastern Sudan regions while millet is the main staple food for majority of households in Darfur and some parts of Kordofan regions in western Sudan. Wheat most often used as a substitute all over northern Sudan but it is a staple food for northern states. Each of the markets represented here act as indicators for a broader region. Khartoum (Om Durman) is representative for Khartoum state, the main urban center of Sudan, and it has linkages with most of other markets in the country. El Obeid is the main assembly and wholesale market in North Kordofan and it is representative for the region, and it links market between central, western, and southern Sudan. El Fasher market is located in the capital of north Darfur state, a chronic food Source: FEWS NET gratefully acknowledges deficit area, and it is representative of the entire of Darfur FAMIS/FMoA, Sudan for the market data and region with links to Geneina market in the border with Chad information used to produce this report.
  • Rapid Assessment Report the Impact of Drought in Red Sea State, Sudan

    Rapid Assessment Report the Impact of Drought in Red Sea State, Sudan

    Rapid Assessment Report On The impact of Drought in Red Sea State, Sudan 6 April 2018 Early Warning Early Action (EWEA) Initiative, FAO Sudan Rapid Assessment on the impact of drought in Red Sea State Early Warning Early Action (EWEA) Initiative, FAO Sudan Contents Page Acronyms and abbreviations ................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Highlights ............................................................................................................................ 3 1. OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 5 3. ASSESSED AREAs ........................................................................................................................ 5 4. OBJECTIVE .................................................................................................................................... 6 5. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 6 6. LIVELIHOOD PROFILE AND POPULATION ................................................................................. 7 7. RAINFALL AND KHOR BARAKA FLOODING ............................................................................... 8 8. LIVESTOCK ...................................................................................................................................
  • SUDAN: West Darfur State UNHCR Presence and Refugee & IDP Locations

    SUDAN: West Darfur State UNHCR Presence and Refugee & IDP Locations

    A A A SUDAN: West Darfur State UNHCR presence and refugee & IDP locations As of 18 Sep 2019 Ardamata #B A #BEl Riad Tandubayah BAbu Zar Sigiba El Geneina#C# #BAl Hujaj Girgira #BJammaa #BKrinding 1 & 2 Mastura\Sania WEST DARFUR #BKrinding 2 Dankud #B Kaidaba KULBUS Falankei Wadi Bardi village #B Kul#bus Abu Rumayl #B Bardani NORTH DARFUR Selea #B Istereina Aro Shorou Taziriba Hijeilija#B Gosmino #B Manjura A #B JEBEL MOON Ginfili Ngerma Djedid Abu Surug SIRBA #B Sirba Melmelli Armankul Abu Shajeira #B B # Bir Dagig Hamroh #B Kondobe #B Kuka WEST DARFUR A Kurgo CHAD Sultan house Birkat Tayr Kawm Dorti #B Abd Allah El RiadAro daBmata Abu #Zar A Jammaa B #B #Krinding 1 & 2 Al Hujaj #BC# #BBB Kaira Krinding 2## Derjeil El Geneina Kreinik EL GENEINA #B KREINIK A Geneina Goker #B DogoumSisi Nurei #B Misterei A #B A Kajilkajili Hagar Jembuh Murnei Kango Haraza Awita #B o #B A Ulang ZalingeiC# EGYPT SAUDI BEIDA Chero Kasi ARABIA LIBYA Zalingei Tabbi Nyebbei HABILA R Kortei e d S Red Sea e Arara a Beida town Northern Beida #B #B Arara AlwadiHabila Madares Nur Al Huda village River Nile #BBC# CHAD Al Salam# North A UNHCR office Darfur Khartoum Kassala Habila North ERITREA Kordofan Refugee Sites Futajiggi West El Gazira Darfur White Gedaref Sala + Lor CENTRAL DARFUR Nile POC IDP camp/sites Central West Sennar #B Darfur Kordofan Blue #B South Nile C# Refugee settlement South East Kordofan Darfur Darfur ETHIOPIA D Crossing point SOUTH SUDAN Main town Secondary town Seilo o Airfields FORO BARANGA SOUTH DARFUR Boundaries & Roads Mogara International boundary Foro Burunga State boundary #BC# Goldober Locality boundary Foro Baranga Primay road A Secondary road 5km The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
  • Sudan (Annual Programme)

    Sudan (Annual Programme)

    Sudan (Annual programme) Main objectives UNHCR's main objectives in Sudan were to pursue recognition of refugee rights through strengthening of the asylum sys- tem; ensure protection and assistance to urban and camp-based refugees; seek Sudan durable solutions for refugees by facilitat- ing voluntary repatriation; resettle those who cannot be locally integrated; reha- bilitate the infrastructure and the envi- ronment in and around closed and vacated camps and improve livelihoods of refugees and host communities; pro- mote gender equality among refugees, returnees, and within host communities; and implement policy priorities on the needs of women, older refugees, and chil- dren including adolescents. Impact • As a result of capacity building and training provided to the Office of the Commissioner for Refugees (COR) and local authorities, 95 per cent of asylum applications were processed without delays; there was a sharp fall in the number of reported cases of refoulement; and the regional COR office in Kassala assumed management of the asylum reception centre as well as responsibility for refugee between the host population and the remaining status determination (RSD) processing in eastern refugee groups. Sudan. • Provision of food, basic medical and other services in refugee camps kept malnutrition, morbidity and mor- Working environment tality rates at minimum levels. • With no prospect of local integration, 508 people The context were resettledin Australia, Canada and the Netherlands. In 2005, UNHCR continued to work in a politically vola- • Two refugee camps (Wad Hileau and Um Ali) were tile environment in eastern Sudan. The opposition par- closed, rehabilitated and handed over to state author- ties in the eastern states of Sudan felt excluded from the ities.
  • The Sudan Flood Impact Rapid Assessment

    The Sudan Flood Impact Rapid Assessment

    The Sudan 2020 Flood impact rapid assessment September 2020 A joint assessment with the Government of the Sudan The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on the map(s) in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. Cover photo: ©FAO The Sudan 2020 Flood impact rapid assessment September 2020 A joint assessment with the Government of the Sudan Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2020 Assessment highlights • Torrential rains and floods combined with the historical overflow of the River Nile and its tributaries caused devastating damages to agriculture and livestock across the Sudan. In the rainfed agriculture sector, around 2 216 322 ha of the planted area was flooded, representing 26.8 percent of cultivated areas in the 15 assessed states. • The production loss due to the crop damage by floods is estimated at 1 044 942 tonnes in the rainfed areas. Sorghum – which is the main staple food in the country – constitutes about 50 percent of the damaged crops, followed by sesame at about 25 percent, then groundnut, millet and vegetables. • The extent of the damage to planted areas in the irrigated sector is estimated at 103 320 ha, which constitutes about 19.4 percent of the total cultivated area. The production loss is under estimation.
  • Hydrocarbons Potential and Resources in Sudan

    Hydrocarbons Potential and Resources in Sudan

    UNCTAD 17th Africa OILGASMINE, Khartoum, 23-26 November 2015 Extractive Industries and Sustainable Job Creation Hydrocarbons potential and resources in Sudan By Mr. Ahmed Gibreel Ahmed El-Amain Section Head G&G Studies, Ministry of Petroleum and Gas, Sudan The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD. Republic of Sudan Ministry of Petroleum & Gas Oil Exploration and Production Authority (OEPA) By Ahmed Gibreel 1 of 20 Outlines Objectives. Introduction. Summary. Hydrocarbon Potentiality. Sudanese Basins Subdivisions. Key Basins overview. Resources. Conclusions. Forward Plan. 2 of 20 Objectives To highlight : Sudan Hydrocarbon potentiality. Sudan Resources. 3 of 20 Introduction First Oil Export1999 Red Sea Salima Basin Basin Misaha Basin Um Agaga Basin Mourdi Basin Khartoum & Atbara basins Wadi Hawar Basin Gadarif Basin Muglad Rawat Blue Nile Basin Basin Basin 4 of 20 Summary Sudan is considered one of the top most African hydrocarbon potential countries. Nearly twenty hydrocarbon basins do exist: o Late Proterozoic-Paleozoic continental sag basins (Misaha, Murdi, Wadi Hawar and Salima). o Mesozoic-Cenozoic rift basins (Muglad, Rawat, Khartoum, Blue Nile and Red sea ). Most of the Sudanese basins is by far highly under explored due to data scarcity and others logistical constrains. Proven petroleum system in the Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic. 5 of 20 Summary Sudanese basins could be classified into: o Producing (1 basin ). o Early exploration stage basins: Have proven petroleum systems with some discoveries ( 5 basins: Rawat, Red Sea, Blue Nile, Um Agaga and Khartoum basins). Have proven petroleum systems but no notable discoveries yet been made e.g.