DOCSLIB.ORG

North Darfur II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Darfur Humanitarian Profile Annexes: I. North Darfur II. South Darfur III. West Darfur Darfur Humanitarian Profile Annex I: North Darfur North Darfur Main Humanitarian Agencies Table 1.1: UN Agencies Table 1.2: International NGOs Table 1.3: National NGOs Intl. Natl. Vehicl Intl. Natl. Vehic Intl. Natl. Vehic Agency Sector staff staff* es** Agency Sector staff staff* les** Agency Sector staff staff les FAO 10 1 2 2 ACF 9 4 12 3 Al-Massar 0 1 0 Operations, Logistics, Camp IOM*** Management x x x GAA 1, 10 1 3 2 KSCS x x x OCHA 14 1 2 3 GOAL 2, 5, 8, 9 6 117 10 SECS x x x 2, 3, 7, UNDP*** 15 x x x ICRC 12, 13 6 20 4 SRC 1, 2 0 10 3 2, 4, 5, 6, UNFPA*** 5, 7 x x x IRC 9, 10, 11 1 5 4 SUDO 5, 7 0 2 0 Protection, Technical expertise for UNHCR*** site planning x x x MSF - B 5 5 10 0 Wadi Hawa 1 1 x 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, Oxfam - UNICEF 9 11, 12 4 5 4 GB 2, 3, 4 5 30 10 Total 1 14 3 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, UNJLC*** 17 x x x SC-UK 11, 12 5 27 8 Technical Spanish UNMAS*** advice x x x Red Cross 3, 4 1 0 1 UNSECOORD 16 1 1 1 DED*** x x x WFP 1, 9, 11 1 12 5 NRC*** x x x WHO 4, 5, 6 2 7 2 Total 34 224 42 Total 10 29 17 x = information unavailable at this time Sectors: 1) Food 2) Shelter/NFIs 3) Clean water 4) Sanitation 5) Primary Health Facilities *Programme and project staff only. 6) Basic Drug Supplies 7) Secondary Health Care 8) EPI 9) Nutrition 10) Agriculture 11) Education **Vehicles operational for field travel. 12) Protection 13) Camp Management 14) Coordination 15) Development ***Activities planned. 16) Field Security 17) Logistical Support Darfur Humanitarian Profile - May 2004 Annex I - North Darfur 1 of 27 Table 2.1: North Darfur Humanitarian Needs and Gaps Conflict Affected People Food Shelter Clean water % Persons Persons Persons Admininistrative Total Affected accessible currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # of Gap, Locality Unit/Location number IDPs residents by UN assisted people Gap, % assisted people Gap, % assisted people % r El Fasher town 32,091 29,154 2,937 100 29,154 2,937 9 22,736 6,418 22 18,500 10,654 37 Korma AU 31,115 31,115 - 100 - 31,115 100 - 31,115 100 - 31,115 100 Tawilla AU 20,015 20,015 - 100 20,015 - - 1,000 19,015 95 7,500 12,515 63 El Fashe Kutum town 87,706 78,706 9,000 100 78,706 - - 13,800 49,906 78 - - - Kutum rural 8,711 8,711 - 100 - 8,711 100 - 8,711 100 - 8,711 100 Fata Borno AU 3,392 3,392 - 100 - 3,392 100 - 3,392 100 - 3,392 100 Tina AU 17,000 17,000 - - - 17,000 100 - 17,000 100 - 17,000 100 Kornoi AU 7,500 7,500 - - - 7,500 100 - 7,500 100 - 7,500 100 - - 13,000 100 - 13,000 100 - 13,000 100 Kutum Umm Baru AU 13,000 13,000 - Kabkabiya town 61,848 61,848 - 100 - 61,848 100 - 45,057 100 18,900 26,157 58 Jebel Si AU 100 100 - 100 - 100 100 - 100 100 - 100 100 Birkat Seira Town 9,000 6,000 3,000 100 - 9,000 100 - 6,000 100 - 6,000 100 100 25,689 - - - 12,199 100 - 25,689 100 Kebkabiya Saraf Omra Town 25,689 12,199 13,490 Mellit Mellit Locality 26,470 26,470 - 20 - 26,470 100 - 26,470 100 - 26,470 100 El Waha, a.k.a. "Damra"** Waha 5,696 5,696 - - - 5,696 100 - 5,696 100 - 5,696 100 TOTAL 349,333 320,906 28,427 8 153,564 195,769 56 37,536 283,370 88 44,900 276,006 86 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE 284,961 256,534 28,427 82 153,564 131,397 46 37,536 218,998 85 44,900 211,634 82 PLEASE NOTE: Total numbers DO NOT take into account El Mashtel camp (16,813 IDPs and conflict affected) in El Fasher, North Darfur. *Source: Ministry of agriculture, 2002/3 ** Non-geographical locality for nomads Darfur Humanitarian Profile - May 2004 Annex I - North Darfur 2 of 27 Table 2.2: North Darfur Humanitarian Needs and Gaps (continued) Primary health care Conflict affected Sanitation facilities Basic drug supplies Secondary health care Persons Persons Persons Persons Total currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # of number IDPs assisted people Gap, % assisted people Gap, % assisted people Gap, % assisted people Gap, % El Fasher town 32,091 29,154 17,000 12,154 42 - 32,091 100 - 32,091 100 - 32,091 100 Korma AU 31,115 31,115 3,000 28,115 90 - 31,115 100 - 31,115 100 - 31,115 100 Tawilla AU 20,015 20,015 - 20,015 100 270 - - 20,015 - - - 20,015 - Kutum town 87,706 78,706 - - - - - - - - - - - - Kutum rural 8,711 8,711 - 8,711 100 - 8,711 100 - 8,711 100 - 8,711 100 Fata Borno AU 3,392 3,392 - 3,392 100 - 3,392 100 - 3,392 100 - 3,392 100 Tina AU 17,000 17,000 - 17,000 100 - 17,000 100 - 17,000 100 - 17,000 100 Kornoi AU 7,500 7,500 - 7,500 100 - 7,500 100 - 7,500 100 - 7,500 100 Umm Baru AU 13,000 13,000 - 13,000 100 - 13,000 100 - 13,000 100 - 13,000 100 Kabkabiya town 61,848 61,848 - 61,848 100 - - - - 61,848 100 - 61,848 100 Jebel Si AU 100 100 - 100 100 - 100 100 - 100 100 - 100 100 Birkat Seira Town 9,000 6,000 - 6,000 100 - 9,000 100 - 9,000 100 - 9,000 100 Saraf Omra Town 25,689 12,199 - 12,199 100 - 25,689 100 - 25,689 100 - 25,689 100 Mellit Locality 26,470 26,470 - 26,470 100 - 26,470 100 - 26,470 100 - 26,470 100 El Waha, a.k.a. "Damra"** 5,696 5,696 - 5,696 100 - 5,696 100 - 5,696 100 - 5,696 100 TOTAL 349,333 320,906 20,000 300,906 94 270 349,063 100 20,015 329,318 94 - 349,333 100 20,000 236,534 92 270 284,691 100 20,015 264,946 93 - 284,961 100 Darfur Humanitarian Profile - May 2004 Annex I - North Darfur 3 of 27 Table 2.3: North Darfur Humanitarian Needs and Gaps (continued) Conflict affected EPI Nutrition Agriculture Education Persons Persons Persons Persons Total currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # of currently Gap, # Gap, currently Gap, # Gap, number IDPs assisted people Gap, % assisted people Gap, % assisted of people % assisted of people % El Fasher town 32,091 29,154 5,455 23,699 81 - 29,154 100 - - - - - - Korma AU 31,115 31,115 - 5,290 100 - - - - - - - - - Tawilla AU 20,015 20,015 - - 771 - - - - - - - - Kutum town 87,706 78,706 - - - - - - - - - - - - Kutum rural 8,711 8,711 - 1,481 100 - - - - - - - - - Fata Borno AU 3,392 3,392 - 3,392 100 - - - - - - - - - Tina AU 17,000 17,000 - 2,890 100 - - - - - - - - - Kornoi AU 7,500 7,500 - 1,275 100 - - - - - - - - - Umm Baru AU 13,000 13,000 - 2,210 100 - - - - - - - - - Kabkabiya town 61,848 61,848 - 61,848 100 - - - - - - - - - Jebel Si AU 100 100 - 17 100 - - - - - - - - - Birkat Seira Town 9,000 6,000 - 1,530 100 - - - - - - - - - Saraf Omra Town 25,689 12,199 - 25,689 100 - - - - - - - - - Mellit Locality 26,470 26,470 - 4,500 100 - - - - - - - - - El Waha, a.k.a. "Damra"** 5,696 5,696 - 968 100 - - - - - - - - - TOTAL 349,333 320,906 5,455 134,789 96 29,154 - - - - 5,455 123,845 96 29,154 - - - - Darfur Humanitarian Profile - May 2004 Annex I - North Darfur 4 of 27 29,154 IDPs Source and date: % accessible by UN: El Fasher Town, Abu Shouk 32,091 Total conflict affected (incl. residents) WFP registration 03/04 100 Persons Agency/ Target currently partner pop. assisted Gap Gap% Planned/Pipeline Comments Action Points WFP/SRC completed food distr. (1 WFP/SRC to follow up WFP/SRC WFP/SRC to carry out general food distr. And month ration - 563 mT) for 32,091 families missed general Food GOS 32,091 29,154 2,937 9 April 04. IDPs. food distr. At Mashtal IRC (GOAL): Distr shelter frames for relocated families. ICRC: Distr 4x6m tarp, 2 3391 families actually relocated to ICRC/IRC will continue ICRC, IRC, blankets, 2 Tanka cloth, and 600g soap for new site. Relocation of the target by shelter/NFI distr. For Shelter/NFIs Goal 29,154 22,736 6,418 22 each family 4 May 2004 relocated IDPS Construction of 24 hand pumps, unicef/WES, Constr. Of 3 Oxfam water tankers, 2 15,000 m3 bladder, submersible ICRC, SCF- submersible pumps, and 3x3x6 taps stands pump, 3x6 tap stands. Rehab of 6 Clean water UK 29,154 18,500 10,654 37 and trough for donkeys hand pumps WHO received 240 household hygiene kits UNICEF provided 187 plasic sheets and started distr for testing. Oxfam plans to Oxfam and 3 to WES for latrine construction of 1500 pit latrines (850 latrines construction. Coordinatoin may be Oxfam, reported done). UNICEF/WES plan to required between WHO, UNICEF, WHO, construct 5 school latrines and hygiene and Oxfam regarding sanitation Sanitation unicef/WES 29,154 17,000 12,154 42 education training.
Recommended publications
  • Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights

    Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 Highlights

    Sudan Humanitarian Situation Report No. 19 Q3 2020 UNICEF and partners assess damage to communities in southern Khartoum. Sudan was significantly affected by heavy flooding this summer, destroying many homes and displacing families. @RESPECTMEDIA PlPl Reporting Period: July-September 2020 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Flash floods in several states and heavy rains in upriver countries caused the White and Blue Nile rivers to overflow, damaging households and in- 5.39 million frastructure. Almost 850,000 people have been directly affected and children in need of could be multiplied ten-fold as water and mosquito borne diseases devel- humanitarian assistance op as flood waters recede. 9.3 million • All educational institutions have remained closed since March due to people in need COVID-19 and term realignments and are now due to open again on the 22 November. 1 million • Peace talks between the Government of Sudan and the Sudan Revolu- internally displaced children tionary Front concluded following an agreement in Juba signed on 3 Oc- tober. This has consolidated humanitarian access to the majority of the 1.8 million Jebel Mara region at the heart of Darfur. internally displaced people 379,355 South Sudanese child refugees 729,530 South Sudanese refugees (Sudan HNO 2020) UNICEF Appeal 2020 US $147.1 million Funding Status (in US$) Funds Fundi received, ng $60M gap, $70M Carry- forward, $17M *This table shows % progress towards key targets as well as % funding available for each sector. Funding available includes funds received in the current year and carry-over from the previous year. 1 Funding Overview and Partnerships UNICEF’s 2020 Humanitarian Action for Children (HAC) appeal for Sudan requires US$147.11 million to address the new and protracted needs of the afflicted population.
  • The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur

    The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur

    The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur John Prendergast, Omer Ismail, and Akshaya Kumar August 2013 WWW.ENOUGHPROJECT.ORG WWW.SATSENTINEL.ORG The Economics of Ethnic Cleansing in Darfur John Prendergast, Omer Ismail, and Akshaya Kumar August 2013 COVER PHOTO Displaced Beni Hussein cattle shepherds take shelter on the outskirts of El Sereif village, North Darfur. Fighting over gold mines in North Darfur’s Jebel Amer area between the Janjaweed Abbala forces and Beni Hussein tribe started early this January and resulted in mass displacement of thousands. AP PHOTO/UNAMID, ALBERT GONZALEZ FARRAN Overview Darfur is burning again, with devastating results for its people. A kaleidoscope of Janjaweed forces are once again torching villages, terrorizing civilians, and systematically clearing prime land and resource-rich areas of their inhabitants. The latest ethnic-cleans- ing campaign has already displaced more than 300,000 Darfuris this year and forced more than 75,000 to seek refuge in neighboring Chad, the largest population displace- ment in recent years.1 An economic agenda is emerging as a major driver for the escalating violence. At the height of the mass atrocities committed from 2003 to 2005, the Sudanese regime’s strategy appeared to be driven primarily by the counterinsurgency objectives and secondarily by the acquisition of salaries and war booty. Undeniably, even at that time, the government could have only secured the loyalty of its proxy Janjaweed militias by allowing them to keep the fertile lands from which they evicted the original inhabitants. Today’s violence is even more visibly fueled by monetary motivations, which include land grabbing; consolidating control of recently discovered gold mines; manipulating reconciliation conferences for increased “blood money”; expanding protection rackets and smuggling networks; demanding ransoms; undertaking bank robberies; and resum- ing the large-scale looting that marked earlier periods of the conflict.
  • SUDAN Price Bulletin August 2021

    SUDAN Price Bulletin August 2021

    SUDAN Price Bulletin August 2021 The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) monitors trends in staple food prices in countries vulnerable to food insecurity. For each FEWS NET country and region, the Price Bulletin provides a set of charts showing monthly prices in the current marketing year in selected urban centers and allowing users to compare current trends with both five-year average prices, indicative of seasonal trends, and prices in the previous year. Sorghum, millet, and wheat are the most important food commodities in northern Sudan. Sorghum is the staple food for the majority of poor households in central and eastern Sudan regions while millet is the main staple food for majority of households in Darfur and some parts of Kordofan regions in western Sudan. Wheat most often used as a substitute all over northern Sudan but it is a staple food for northern states. Each of the markets represented here act as indicators for a broader region. Khartoum (Om Durman) is representative for Khartoum state, the main urban center of Sudan, and it has linkages with most of other markets in the country. El Obeid is the main assembly and wholesale market in North Kordofan and it is representative for the region, and it links market between central, western, and southern Sudan. El Fasher market is located in the capital of north Darfur state, a chronic food Source: FEWS NET gratefully acknowledges deficit area, and it is representative of the entire of Darfur FAMIS/FMoA, Sudan for the market data and region with links to Geneina market in the border with Chad information used to produce this report.
  • SUDAN: West Darfur State UNHCR Presence and Refugee & IDP Locations

    SUDAN: West Darfur State UNHCR Presence and Refugee & IDP Locations

    A A A SUDAN: West Darfur State UNHCR presence and refugee & IDP locations As of 18 Sep 2019 Ardamata #B A #BEl Riad Tandubayah BAbu Zar Sigiba El Geneina#C# #BAl Hujaj Girgira #BJammaa #BKrinding 1 & 2 Mastura\Sania WEST DARFUR #BKrinding 2 Dankud #B Kaidaba KULBUS Falankei Wadi Bardi village #B Kul#bus Abu Rumayl #B Bardani NORTH DARFUR Selea #B Istereina Aro Shorou Taziriba Hijeilija#B Gosmino #B Manjura A #B JEBEL MOON Ginfili Ngerma Djedid Abu Surug SIRBA #B Sirba Melmelli Armankul Abu Shajeira #B B # Bir Dagig Hamroh #B Kondobe #B Kuka WEST DARFUR A Kurgo CHAD Sultan house Birkat Tayr Kawm Dorti #B Abd Allah El RiadAro daBmata Abu #Zar A Jammaa B #B #Krinding 1 & 2 Al Hujaj #BC# #BBB Kaira Krinding 2## Derjeil El Geneina Kreinik EL GENEINA #B KREINIK A Geneina Goker #B DogoumSisi Nurei #B Misterei A #B A Kajilkajili Hagar Jembuh Murnei Kango Haraza Awita #B o #B A Ulang ZalingeiC# EGYPT SAUDI BEIDA Chero Kasi ARABIA LIBYA Zalingei Tabbi Nyebbei HABILA R Kortei e d S Red Sea e Arara a Beida town Northern Beida #B #B Arara AlwadiHabila Madares Nur Al Huda village River Nile #BBC# CHAD Al Salam# North A UNHCR office Darfur Khartoum Kassala Habila North ERITREA Kordofan Refugee Sites Futajiggi West El Gazira Darfur White Gedaref Sala + Lor CENTRAL DARFUR Nile POC IDP camp/sites Central West Sennar #B Darfur Kordofan Blue #B South Nile C# Refugee settlement South East Kordofan Darfur Darfur ETHIOPIA D Crossing point SOUTH SUDAN Main town Secondary town Seilo o Airfields FORO BARANGA SOUTH DARFUR Boundaries & Roads Mogara International boundary Foro Burunga State boundary #BC# Goldober Locality boundary Foro Baranga Primay road A Secondary road 5km The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
  • The Sudan Flood Impact Rapid Assessment

    The Sudan Flood Impact Rapid Assessment

    The Sudan 2020 Flood impact rapid assessment September 2020 A joint assessment with the Government of the Sudan The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on the map(s) in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. Dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. Cover photo: ©FAO The Sudan 2020 Flood impact rapid assessment September 2020 A joint assessment with the Government of the Sudan Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 2020 Assessment highlights • Torrential rains and floods combined with the historical overflow of the River Nile and its tributaries caused devastating damages to agriculture and livestock across the Sudan. In the rainfed agriculture sector, around 2 216 322 ha of the planted area was flooded, representing 26.8 percent of cultivated areas in the 15 assessed states. • The production loss due to the crop damage by floods is estimated at 1 044 942 tonnes in the rainfed areas. Sorghum – which is the main staple food in the country – constitutes about 50 percent of the damaged crops, followed by sesame at about 25 percent, then groundnut, millet and vegetables. • The extent of the damage to planted areas in the irrigated sector is estimated at 103 320 ha, which constitutes about 19.4 percent of the total cultivated area. The production loss is under estimation.
  • The Chad–Sudan Proxy War and the 'Darfurization' of Chad: Myths and Reality

    The Chad–Sudan Proxy War and the 'Darfurization' of Chad: Myths and Reality

    12 The Chad–Sudan Proxy War and the ‘Darfurization’ of Chad: Myths and Reality By Jérôme Tubiana Copyright The Small Arms Survey Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey The Small Arms Survey is an independent research project located at the Grad- uate Institute of International Studies in Geneva, Switzerland. It serves as the © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva 2008 principal source of public information on all aspects of small arms and as a First published in April 2008 resource centre for governments, policy-makers, researchers, and activists. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a Established in 1999, the project is supported by the Swiss Federal Department retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior of Foreign Affairs, and by contributions from the Governments of Belgium, permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by Canada, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, and the UK. The law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- Survey is also grateful for past and current project-specific support received zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should from Australia, Denmark, and New Zealand. Further funding has been pro- be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. vided by the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, the Geneva International Academic Net- Small Arms Survey work, and the Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining. The Graduate Institute of International Studies Small Arms Survey collaborates with research institutes and NGOs in many 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland countries, including Brazil, Canada, Georgia, Germany, India, Israel, Jordan, Copyedited by Emily Walmsley Norway, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Sweden, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
  • Information on the Internally Displaced Persons (Idps)

    Information on the Internally Displaced Persons (Idps)

    COI QUERY Country of Origin Sudan Main subject IDPs in Darfur and the Two Areas Question(s) Information on the internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Darfur and the Two Areas in the period of August 2019 - May 2020: - overview of numbers of IDPs and returnees: Darfur, The Two Areas, - living conditions and personal safety: Darfur, The Two Areas, - treatment by the Sovereign Council government: Darfur, The Two Areas. Date of completion 1 July 2020 Query Code Q15-2020 Contributing EU+ COI -- units (if applicable) Disclaimer This response to a COI query has been elaborated according to the EASO COI Report Methodology and EASO Writing and Referencing Guide. The information provided in this response has been researched, evaluated and processed with utmost care within a limited time frame. All sources used are referenced. A quality review has been performed in line with the above mentioned methodology. This document does not claim to be exhaustive neither conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to international protection. If a certain event, person or organisation is not mentioned in the report, this does not mean that the event has not taken place or that the person or organisation does not exist. Terminology used should not be regarded as indicative of a particular legal position. The information in the response does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EASO and makes no political statement whatsoever. The target audience is caseworkers, COI researchers, policy makers, and decision making authorities. The answer was finalised on 1 July 2020. Any event taking place after this date is not included in this answer.
  • Darfur Destroyed Ethnic Cleansing by Government and Militia Forces in Western Sudan Summary

    Darfur Destroyed Ethnic Cleansing by Government and Militia Forces in Western Sudan Summary

    Human Rights Watch May 2004 Vol. 16, No. 6(A) DARFUR DESTROYED ETHNIC CLEANSING BY GOVERNMENT AND MILITIA FORCES IN WESTERN SUDAN SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................... 3 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 5 ABUSES BY THE GOVERNMENT-JANJAWEED IN WEST DARFUR.................... 7 Mass Killings By the Government and Janjaweed............................................................... 8 Attacks and massacres in Dar Masalit ............................................................................... 8 Mass Executions of captured Fur men in Wadi Salih: 145 killed................................ 21 Other Mass Killings of Fur civilians in Wadi Salih........................................................ 23 Aerial bombardment of civilians ..........................................................................................24 Systematic Targeting of Marsali and Fur, Burnings of Marsalit Villages and Destruction of Food Stocks and Other Essential Items ..................................................26 Destruction of Mosques and Islamic Religious Articles............................................... 27 Killings and assault accompanying looting of property....................................................28 Rape and other forms
  • COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response

    COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response

    SUDAN COVID-19 Situation Overview & Response 11 October 2020 CONFIRMED CASES by state NO. OF ACTIVITIES by Organization as of 11 October 2020 13,691 International boundary IOM 912 State boundary UNHCR 234 Confirmed cases Undetermined boundary Save the children 193 Abyei PCA Area Red Sea ECDO 150 385 UNFPA 135 Number of confirmed cases RIVER RED SEA 836 6,764 NILE Plan International Sudan 39 Welthungerhilfe (WHH) 34 Deaths Recovered 391 438 WHO 23 NORTHERN HOPE 22 HIGHLIGHTS 146 NCA 20 9,841 The Federal Ministry of Health identified the first case of COVID-19 on 12 March WVI 19 OXFAM 12 2020. United Nations organisations and their partners created a Corona Virus 228 NADA Alazhar 12 Country Preparedness and Response Plan (CPRP) to support the Government. EMERGENCY NGO Sudan 12 NORTH DARFUR KHARTOUM On 14 March 2020, the Government approved measures to prevent the spread of KASSALA EMERGENCY 12 Khartoum the virus which included reducing congestion in workplaces, closing schools 1,137 TGH 11 By Organization Type: NORTH KORDOFAN and banning large public gatherings. From 8 July 2020, the Government started AL GEZIRA World Vision Sudan 11 GEDAREF NORWEGIAN 9 174 7 WEST REFUGEE COUNCIL to ease the lock-down in Khartoum State. The nationwide curfew was changed 203 (9.33%) (0.38%) DARFUR WHITE 274 Italian Agency 7 from 6:00 pm to 5:00 am and bridges in the capital were re-opened. Travelling Development Co. NGO Governmental 34 NILE 243 Near East Foundation 7 between Khartoum and other states is still not allowed and airports will 191 SENNAR CAFOD 6 CENTRAL WEST gradually open pending further instructions from the Civil Aviation Authority.
  • Darfur Cover.Indd

    Darfur Cover.Indd

    Water resource management in humanitarian programming in Darfur: The case for drought preparedness Report of the UNEP mission to review water resource management at IDP camps and host communities in Darfur during February & March 2008 October 2008 © 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Layout by: N. Meith Cover photo: water collection from a wadi bed near to Masterei in West Darfur in the dry season. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permis- sion in writing from UNEP. The designation of geographical entities in this report, and the presentation of the material herein, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publisher or the participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. United Nations Environment Programme 11-13, Chemin des Anémones CH-1219 Châtelaine, Geneva Tel. : +41 (0)22 917 8615 Fax: +41 (0)22 917 8988 http://www.unep.org/tsunami/ UNEP Sudan programme c/o UNDP Sudan Gama’a Avenue,House 7,Block 5 P.O. Box 913 Postal Code 11111 Khartoum - Sudan Tel.: (+ 249) 1 83 783 820 Fax: (+ 249) 1 83
  • Chad-Sudan Situation

    Chad-Sudan Situation

    Chad-Sudan situation Operational highlights • More than 26,000 refugees and over 4,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs) were able to return to their places of origin in Southern Sudan with UNHCR’s assistance. • Nearly 45,000 refugees, mainly Eritrean, benefited from awareness-raising and peer education on the prevention of HIV and AIDS, sexual and gender-based violence and female genital mutilation. • Two new refugee camps (Um Shalaya and Mukjar) were set up in West Darfur. More than 3,000 Chadian refugees were moved to the camps from the Chad-Sudan border. Chad • Refugees were registered in 13 of the 15 camps in southern and eastern Chad, strengthening UNHCR’s Sudan ability to deliver protection and assistance. Chad-Sudan situation Working environment 1706, passed in August 2006, called for the deployment of a UN peacekeeping force of more than 20,000 troops. Meanwhile, the international community Relations between Sudan and Eritrea improved in April agreed to a joint AU/UN force. 2006 with the restoration of diplomatic ties and the reopening of the border. The withdrawal of the former Insecurity hampered operations in eastern Chad. In Sudan People’s Liberation Movement Army (SPLM/A) April, a coup attempt in the capital, N’Djamena, by forces from Hamesh Koreb in eastern Sudan and their rebel forces, was foiled by the Government. In redeployment to Southern Sudan in August 2006, as November, after a rebel attack on Abéché, the well as the signing of the peace agreement between the Government declared a six-month-long state of Sudanese Government and the Eastern Front (a coalition emergency.
  • Idps Hotspot Dashbaord(As of 29Th August 2021) Version 1

    Idps Hotspot Dashbaord(As of 29Th August 2021) Version 1

    PROTECTION CLUSTER | SUDAN Protection Hotspots in Sudan Protection Cluster Sudan Activities of Protection Cluster Including Child rPotection, Women Protection, and Mine Action Areas of asResponsibility of 29 August A2021 (oR) 1/4 POPULATIONKey Figures RESPONSE AGE AND GENDER In 2020,ASSISTANCE the protection sector MONTHLY has recorded TREND a total of 280 such incidents as a result of which thousands of people displaced, lost their villages, Over 200* 64 8 houses and livestock, many people were killed Sites Localities States and injured. These hotspots also covers Hotspot Hotspot Hotspot locations where during the rainy season *the exact number of hotspot sites in South Kordofan and Blue Nile States is subject to verification due to access intercommunal violence and conflict over the use problems. of resources reported. Furthermore, most of the Number of Hotspots Sites and Localities per State locations in Jabal Mara of Central Darfur, South 50 49 and West Kordofan and Blue Nile states considered as hotspots because of difficulties 40 33 32 the humanitarian organization face in terms of 30 accessing, as well as because of the presence of 22 ERW and UXOs. 20 15 19 10 12 12 10 7 4 6 6 6 3 4 0 East Darfur Blue Nile South Kordofan West Darfur South Darfur North Darfur Central Darfur West Kordofan Population in the Affected Areas 2,681,570 33 1,474,769 135,040 56,810 Estimated Affected Population Total IDPs Camps in Total IDPs in Total Returnees in Total Refugees in in Hotspot Areas. The Hotspot Areas. The Hotspot Areas. The Hotspot Areas.