DOCSLIB.ORG

Bog Znaet: the Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bog Znaet: the Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 By Bog znaet: The Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 By Thomas Henry James Dyne A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Irina Paperno, chair Professor Eric Naiman Professor C. Namwali Serpell Spring 2019 Bog znaet: The Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 © 2019 By Thomas Henry James Dyne 1 Abstract Bog znaet: The Ethics of Omniscience in Russian Narrative, 1845-1870 by Thomas Henry James Dyne Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Irina Paperno, Chair This dissertation examines how the narratives of Ivan Turgenev, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Lev Tolstoy grapple with the consequences of their omniscience. Their narrators do not simply read minds and tell stories; they also become wrapped-up in the ethical implications of telling stories that require the reading of minds. In effect, they ask: what happens when narrators become godlike? Does the privilege of omniscience define—or disrupt—the novel’s ethical value? I argue that the phrase “God only knows” [Bog znaet] becomes the constant refrain of realist narrative, a performance of authority in the moment of divesting from it. In a series of close readings—from Turgenev’s early Sketches of a Hunter to his novel Fathers and Sons, from Dostoevsky’s first work Poor Folk to his late story “The Meek One,” and from Tolstoy’s earliest semi-autobiographical narrative experiments to the trilogy of novels Childhood, Boyhood, and Youth—I argue that the newly omniscient Russian narrator draws attention to the consequences of his gaze, highlighting the existence of a boundary in the moment he makes a display of crossing it, making sacrosanct the interior of the other in the process of laying it bare. These narratives of Turgenev, Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy become deeply concerned with the troubling effects of their increasingly privileged intrusion into the minds of others and, in making us ever aware of the ethical consequences of reading the face to access the mind, cast a spotlight back onto our reading of them. Recent works of literary criticism—from rhetorical humanists championing the value of literature to deconstructive examinations of the ethics of reading—investigate the intersection of narrative and ethics in the novel. This dissertation brings Russian narratives of the mid nineteenth-century into this conversation, which has not yet been done by Slavic scholars. Building on recent theories of narrative ethics and omniscience, this dissertation argues that an awareness of the transgressive nature of privileged knowledge becomes clearly manifest in realist prose, even when hidden feelings and unspoken thoughts are rendered legible. These works reckon with—and invite us to attend to—the troubling effects of their increasingly privileged intrusion into the minds of others. Turgenev’s, Dostoevsky’s, and Tolstoy’s narratives rely on strategies of representation that mark themselves as instances of self-aware transgression, defining their own devices of omniscience as an ethically fraught process, caught up in the problem of making knowable what “God only knows.” i TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………….1 Chapter 1 “What has happened inside this man?”: the ethics of penetrating the body of the other in Turgenev’s narratives 12 Chapter 2 “That’s the horrible part: I understand everything!”: the ethics of misreading the other in Dostoevsky’s Poor Folk and “The Meek One 43 Chapter 3 “I read what I ought not to know”: the ethics of overreading in Tolstoy’s early narrative omniscience 73 Epilogue…………………………………………………………………………………….…..110 Works Cited………………………………………………………………………………….....113 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I have to acknowledge the great debt I owe to Irina Paperno, Eric Naiman, and Namwali Serpell – I could not have asked for a better, more attentive, and more encouraging committee. Thanks, too, to Dorothy Hale, for many long and illuminating discussions of narrative ethics, as well as to the rest of the faculty of the Berkeley Slavic Department, particularly Harsha Ram and Luba Golburt for their help as graduate advisers and as readers of early drafts of the papers and exam responses that would plant the seed of this dissertation. Thanks also to Anna Daniilovna Muza, without whose support and wisdom I could not have gotten through my last years of teaching Russian. Дай Бог здоровья вам, и генеральский чин. I must also thank and acknowledge the help and support of the Russian department at New York University, particularly that of Ilya Kliger, who, in giving me my first bad grade in a literature class (for trying to make up for a lack of an argument with plot summary), started me on the journey of close-reading some fifteen years ago; of Michael Kunichika, for convincing me to go to Berkeley in the first place; of Yanni Kotsonis, whose classes first made me want to become a Slavicist; of Eliot Borenstein, for giving me my first job as a college instructor; and of Irina Belodedova, for all her help navigating the early years of learning Russian. I owe so much to my wonderful cohort of colleagues and friends—partners—at the Berkeley Slavic department and beyond. I love you, Dave. And finally, thanks does not sufficiently do justice to what I owe my parents, Eileen Kennedy, James Dyne, and Mary Ann Dyne, for their constant care and support. 1 Бог знает, где бродили его мысли, но не в одном только прошедшем бродили они: выражение его лица было сосредоточенно и угрюмо, чего не бывает, когда человек занят одними воспоминаниями. “God only knows where his thoughts wandered, but they did not wander only into the past: the expression of his face was concentrated and sullen, which does not happen when a man is absorbed solely in his memories.” Fathers and Sons, Chapter IV (8:211)1 INTRODUCTION I. Бог знает What happens when narrators become godlike? Does narrative omniscience, with its penetrating gaze and access to the privileged knowledge of character interiors, define—or disrupt—the novel’s ethical value? The narratives of Ivan Turgenev, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and Lev Tolstoy are intensely concerned with these problems. Their narrators do not simply read minds and tell stories; they also become wrappeD-up in the ethical implications of telling stories that require the reading of minds at all. But how is an awareness of the ethical problem of knowing someone too well—of “getting” their story and fixing them in words—possibly made manifest in the tradition of Russian realist novelistic narrative, where even consciousness, unspoken feelings, and private thoughts are rendered knowable? It would seem that nineteenth-century novelistic narrative’s greatest trick—accessing interiority and, in Dorrit Cohn’s terms, making the minds of other people transparent, such that we know the characters of novels better than we could ever know each other—also engenders its most significant ethical consequences.2 In the epigraph above, the narrator of Turgenev’s Fathers and Sons [Отцы и дети, 1862] defaults before God’s knowledge of his characters, begging not only ignorance, but also the very impossibility of such privileged knowledge at all. Although the narrator has just checked in on all the novel’s other main characters, peering into their bedrooms and detailing their mental states with ease, here he insteaD notes the visible illegibility of Pavel Petrovich’s thoughts: while “God only knows” their content, their direction is clearly to be seen in the expression of his face. This narrative voice, despite paying lip-service to the impenetrable sanctity of the character’s mind, in the same breath still breaks this boundary, narrating Pavel Petrovich’s thoughts by reading his face, unquestionably certain in the knowledge of which expressions correspond to which interior states. Turgenev’s narrator here attests to the unknowability of the character’s mind in the same sentence that makes it self-evident. 1 Translation aDapteD from RicharD Hare’s (1948). 2 Cohn asserts that this contraDiction lies at the heart of fictionality: the “most real” literary characters are “those we know most intimately, precisely in ways we could never know people in real life,” while the verisimilitude at the center of literary fiction relies on the communication and representation of the incommunicable anD unrepresentable. Dorrit Cohn, Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1978), 5-7. 2 This moment, I argue, lays out the antinomies central to the development of narrative omniscience in the mid-nineteenth-century Russian novel. Just as the character’s thoughts are at once legible and illegible, his mind made inviolable in the moment it is also violateD, so too is narrative authority defined by an anxious flitting between two opposites. The narrator divests his gaze of any penetrative insight (“God only knows where his thoughts wandered”) in the same sentence that he relies on it (“but they did not wander only into the past”). The narrative is aware of these contradictions, and draws attention to them. I argue that “God only knows”3 indexes the way Russian narratives of the mid nineteenth-century grapple with the consequences of their nascent omniscience. With the constant refrain of “God only knows”—the bellwether of a larger process of disavowing privilege in the moment of relying on it—Turgenev’s, Dostoevsky’s, and Tolstoy’s narrative voices make visible the work of their omniscience, as well as make known their anxiety over its effects. By attending to the consequences of the act of narratively penetrating the mind of the other, making difficult to cross a boundary that they cross all the same, these early omniscient narratives take the shape of an ethically-invested reckoning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Virginia Woolf's Portraits of Russian Writers
    Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers: Creating the Literary Other By Darya Protopopova Virginia Woolf’s Portraits of Russian Writers: Creating the Literary Other By Darya Protopopova This book first published 2019 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2019 by Darya Protopopova All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-2753-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-2753-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Note on the Text ........................................................................................ vi Preface ...................................................................................................... vii Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Russia and the British Search for the Cultural ‘Other’ Chapter One .............................................................................................. 32 Woolf’s Real and Fictional Russians Chapter Two ............................................................................................. 58 Woolf and Dostoevsky: Verbalising the Soul Chapter Three ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OLD ELITES UNDER COMMUNISM: SOVIET RULE IN LENINOBOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY FLORA J. ROBERTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................. ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One. Noble Allies of the Revolution: Classroom to Battleground (1916-1922) . 43 Chapter Two. Class Warfare: the Old Boi Network Challenged (1925-1930) ............... 105 Chapter Three. The Culture of Cotton Farms (1930s-1960s) ......................................... 170 Chapter Four. Purging the Elite: Politics and Lineage (1933-38) .................................. 224 Chapter Five. City on Paper: Writing Tajik in Stalinobod (1930-38) ............................ 282 Chapter Six. Islam and the Asilzodagon: Wartime and Postwar Leninobod .................. 352 Chapter Seven. The
    [Show full text]
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    About This Volume Brett Cooke We continue to be surprised by how the extremely rewarding world WKDW/HR7ROVWR\FUHDWHGLVDG\QDPLFVWLOOJURZLQJRQH:KHQWKH Russian writer sat down in 1863 to begin what became War and PeaceKHXWLOL]HGSRUWUDLWVRIfamily members, as well as images RIKLPVHOILQZKDWDW¿UVWFRQVWLWXWHGDOLJKWO\¿FWLRQDOL]HGfamily chronicle; he evidently used the exercise to consider how he and the SUHVHQWVWDWHRIKLVFRXQWU\FDPHWREH7KLVLQYROYHGDUHWKLQNLQJRI KRZKLVSDUHQWV¶JHQHUDWLRQZLWKVWRRGWKH)UHQFKLQYDVLRQRI slightly more than a half century prior, both militarily and culturally. Of course, one thinks about many things in the course of six highly FUHDWLYH \HDUV DQG KLV WH[W UHÀHFWV PDQ\ RI WKHVH LQWHUHVWV +LV words are over determined in that a single scene or even image typically serves several themes as he simultaneously pondered the Napoleonic Era, the present day in Russia, his family, and himself, DVZHOODVPXFKHOVH6HOIGHYHORSPHQWEHLQJWKH¿UVWRUGHUIRUDQ\ VHULRXVDUWLVWZHVHHDQWLFLSDWLRQVRIWKHSURWHDQFKDOOHQJHV7ROVWR\ posed to the contemporary world decades after War and Peace in terms of religion, political systems, and, especially, moral behavior. In other words, he grew in stature. As the initial reception of the QRYHO VKRZV 7ROVWR\ UHVSRQGHG WR WKH FRQVWHUQDWLRQ RI LWV ¿UVW readers by increasing the dynamism of its form and considerably DXJPHQWLQJLWVLQWHOOHFWXDODPELWLRQV,QKLVKDQGV¿FWLRQEHFDPH emboldened to question the structure of our universe and expand our sense of our own nature. We are all much the richer spiritually for his achievement. One of the happy accidents of literary history is that War and Peace and Fyodor 'RVWRHYVN\¶VCrime and PunishmentZHUH¿UVW published in the same literary periodical, The Russian Messenger. )XUWKHUPRUHDV-DQHW7XFNHUH[SODLQVERWKQRYHOVH[SUHVVFRQFHUQ whether Russia should continue to conform its culture to West (XURSHDQ PRGHOV VLPXOWDQHRXVO\ VHL]LQJ RQ WKH VDPH ¿JXUH vii Napoleon Bonaparte, in one case leading a literal invasion of the country, in the other inspiring a premeditated murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism
    Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism BORIS SOROKIN TOLSTOY in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism PUBLISHED BY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR MIAMI UNIVERSITY Copyright ® 1979 by Miami University All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Sorokin, Boris, 1922­ Tolstoy in prerevolutionary Russian criticism. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Tolstoi, Lev Nikolaevich, graf, 1828-1910—Criticism and interpretation—History. 2. Criticism—Russia. I. Title. PG3409.5.S6 891.7'3'3 78-31289 ISBN 0-8142-0295-0 Contents Preface vii 1/ Tolstoy and His Critics: The Intellectual Climate 3 2/ The Early Radical Critics 37 3/ The Slavophile and Organic Critics 71 4/ The Aesthetic Critics 149 5/ The Narodnik Critics 169 6/ The Symbolist Critics 209 7/ The Marxist Critics 235 Conclusion 281 Notes 291 Bibliography 313 Index 325 PREFACE Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) has been described as the most momen­ tous phenomenon of Russian life during the nineteenth century.1 Indeed, in his own day, and for about a generation afterward, he was an extraordinarily influential writer. During the last part of his life, his towering personality dominated the intellectual climate of Russia and the world to an unprecedented degree. His work, moreover, continues to be studied and admired. His views on art, literature, morals, politics, and life have never ceased to influence writers and thinkers all over the world. Such interest over the years has produced an immense quantity of books and articles about Tolstoy, his ideas, and his work. In Russia alone their number exceeded ten thousand some time ago (more than 5,500 items were published in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1957) and con­ tinues to rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo Tolstoy's Sevastopol Stories
    2008.072008.07.0.0.0.02222 Classics Revisited: Leo TolstoyTolstoy’’’’ss Sevastopol Stories bybyby Walter G. Moss Eastern Michigan University With the following essay, the Review launches a new series entitled “Classics Revi- sited.” Its goal will be to provide thoughtful reconsiderations of masterpieces in the literature of war. Both literary and purely historical works will be included. The in- augural appreciation is by Walter G. Moss, professor of history at Eastern Michigan University. Professor Moss, who has taught Russian history, philosophy, and litera- ture for many years, is the author of numerous articles and distinguished books within and beyond those subject areas, including A History of Russia , 2 vols. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997; 2 nd ed. London: Anthem, 2002/5), Russia in the Age of Alexander II, Tolstoy, and Dostoyevsky (London: Anthem, 2002), An Age of Progress? Clashing Twentieth-Century Global Forces (London: Anthem, 2008), and, with R.D. Goff, J. Terry, J-H. Upshur, and M. Schroeder, The Twentieth Century and Beyond: A Global History , 7 th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007). — Ed. In April 1855, in the midst of the Crimean War, a twenty-six year old Russian sub- lieutenant, Leo Tolstoy, was commanding an artillery battery in the besieged Black Sea city of Sevastopol. 1 His unit was in the most forward bastion of the defense. It was close to the French lines and under constant and heavy bombardment. Occasionally while at the front, in a bomb-proof dugout with the sounds of cannons booming in his ears, he wrote a story about the siege of the city at the end of the previous year--he had first entered Sevastopol in November and subsequently moved back and forth from the front.
    [Show full text]
  • War and Peace
    WAR AND PEACE Instructor: Prof. Ingrid Kleespies Email: [email protected] Office Hours: T, W 2:00-3:00pm & by appt. Office: 328 Pugh Hall Vasily Vereshchagin, "Return from the Petrov Palace," 1895 Course Description From the battlefield to the ballroom, Tolstoy's epic novel of life in Russia at the beginning of the nineteenth century is a profound meditation on the causes of war, the nature of social relationships, the poles of human suffering and love, and, perhaps most importantly, the nature and meaning of history itself. In this course we will read War and Peace closely in its entirety. We will examine the origins of the novel in Tolstoy's early writing and consider the historical, political, and social contexts, both of the events described (the Napoleonic Wars) and the period fifty years later in which Tolstoy wrote War and Peace. We will address some of the following questions: Is War and Peace a novel? How does Tolstoy's obsession with the theme of history shape the text on a variety of levels? What do various adaptations of the novel tell us about its reception at different historical moments? Finally, how might War and Peace be relevant to our own moment in history? General Education Objectives This course will provide students with an opportunity to explore the interrelationship between literature, art, and national identity. In so doing, it is designed to fulfill General Education distribution requirements in the categories of “Humanities” (H) and “International” (N). The content of the course draws students’ attention to the values, attitudes, and norms that shape Russian culture (N).
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy's Short Fiction, Ed. by Michael R. Katz
    BOOK REVIEWS: Michael R. Katz, ed. Tolstoy's Short Fiction. New York: W.W. Norton & co., 1991. 503 pp. Like Homer, Tolstoy is homo duorum librorum. But if the hazards of transmission prevented even the Roman world from knowing more of Homer's creation, except by wistful hypothesis, Tolstoy's legacy beyond the two epics is bounteous and diverse, disengaged from the shadow of the major works while yet offering, as Homer's lost Margites apparently did, a commentary on them. outside the novels, Tolstoy's stories comprise the amplest and the most influencial body of fiction he produced. Like his admired predecessor, Tolstoy gave us a long work about society in the moment of finding its heroes, and a comparable study of society disconnected from heroism and the means of achieving it. The stories, in contrast, tend to deemphasize the dialectic between polis and person. Characters more often observe themselves than others, and the intense moments of bearing witness from which characters in the novels profit--Levin seeing his brother die, Pierre watching the downfall of his wife--are presented to the reader undigested by a second textual consciousness which the narrator esteems. This lack of a significant internal audience to action creates a fiction very different from War and Peace and Anna Karenina. The connection which Tolstoy believed art must demonstrate between people is demonstrated between reader and text. Michael Katz's Norton critical Edition brings together much of Tolstoy's best short fiction: "Sevastopol" (December, May), "Three Deaths," "Family Happiness," "God Sees the Truth, But Waits," "The Death of Ivan Ilych," "The Three Hermits," "The Kreutzer Sonata," "Master and Man," and "Alyosha the Pot." Except for the last story, translated by S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circassian Thistle: Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy's Khadzhi
    ABSTRACT THE CIRCASSIAN THISTLE: TOLSTOY’S KHADZHI MURAT AND THE EVOLVING RUSSIAN EMPIRE by Eric M. Souder The following thesis examines the creation, publication, and reception of Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy’s posthumous novel, Khadzhi Murat in both the Imperial and Soviet Russian Empire. The anti-imperial content of the novel made Khadzhi Murat an incredibly vulnerable novel, subjecting it to substantial early censorship. Tolstoy’s status as a literary and cultural figure in Russia – both preceding and following his death – allowed for the novel to become virtually forgotten despite its controversial content. This thesis investigates the absorption of Khadzhi Murat into the broader canon of Tolstoy’s writings within the Russian Empire as well as its prevailing significance as a piece of anti-imperial literature in a Russian context. THE CIRCASSIAN THISTLE: TOLSTOY’S KHADZHI MURAT AND THE EVOLVING RUSSIAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by Eric Matthew Souder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2014 Dr. Stephen Norris Dr. Daniel Prior Dr. Margaret Ziolkowski TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter I - The Tolstoy Canon: The Missing Avar……………………………………………….2 Chapter II – Inevitable Editing: The Publication and Censorship of Khadzhi Murat………………5 Chapter III – Historiography and Appropriation: The Critical Response to Khadzhi Murat……17 Chapter IV – Conclusion………………………………………………………………………...22 Afterword………………………………………………………………………………………..24 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………..27 ii Introduction1 In late-October 1910, Lev Nikolaevich Tolstoy died at Astopovo Station, approximately 120 miles from his family estate at Yasnaya Polyana in the Tula region of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Intellectual Culture: the End of Russian Intelligentsia
    Russian Culture Center for Democratic Culture 2012 Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri N. Shalin University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture Part of the Asian History Commons, Cultural History Commons, European History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, Political History Commons, Slavic Languages and Societies Commons, and the Social History Commons Repository Citation Shalin, D. N. (2012). Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia. In Dmitri N. Shalin, 1-68. Available at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/russian_culture/6 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in Russian Culture by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intellectual Culture: The End of Russian Intelligentsia Dmitri Shalin No group cheered louder for Soviet reform, had a bigger stake in perestroika, and suffered more in its aftermath than did the Russian intelligentsia. Today, nearly a decade after Mikhail Gorbachev unveiled his plan to reform Soviet society, the mood among Russian intellectuals is decidedly gloomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Idiot, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alan Myers, William
    The Idiot, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Alan Myers, William Leatherbarrow, Oxford University Press, 2008, 0199536392, 9780199536399, 658 pages. The Idiot (1868), written under the appalling personal circumstances Dostoevsky endured while travelling in Europe, not only reveals the author's acute artistic sense and penetrating psychological insight, but also affords his most powerful indictment of a Russia struggling to emulate contemporary Europe while sinking under the weight of Western materialism. It is the portrait of nineteenth-century Russian society in which a "positively good man" clashes with the emptiness of a society that cannot accommodate his moral idealism. Meticulously faithful to the original, this new translation includes explanatory notes and a critical introduction by W.J. Leatherbarrow. About the Series: For over 100 years Oxford World's Classics has made available the broadest spectrum of literature from around the globe. Each affordable volume reflects Oxford's commitment to scholarship, providing the most accurate text plus a wealth of other valuable features, including expert introductions by leading authorities, voluminous notes to clarify the text, up-to-date bibliographies for further study, and much more.. DOWNLOAD HERE Dostoevsky's The Idiot A Critical Companion, Liza Knapp, 1998, Literary Criticism, 274 pages. This book is designed to guide readers through Dostoevsky's The Idiot, first published in 1869 and generally considered to be his most mysterious and confusing work. The volume .... Persuasion , Jane Austen, 1947, English fiction, 254 pages. The House of the Dead and Poor Folk , Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 2004, Fiction, 446 pages. In "The House of the Dead, Dostoevsky give vent to his perceptions of prison life, writing from his grueling experience in a Siberian camp, and introduces a gallery of boastful ...
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Makin Great Books 291 Five Lectures on Crime and Punishment
    Michael Makin Great Books 291 Five Lectures on Crime and Punishment You may find the following chronology, with links, of use in guiding your study of Dostoevsky’s novel F. M. Dostoevsky -- Chronology through 1866 1821 3 October, born, Moscow. Father -- Mikhail, doctor (son of priest), who had risen through service to acquire noble status; mother of merchant stock. Former Mariinskii Hospital for the Poor, Moscow, where FMD’s father worked as a doctor, at the time of FMD’s birth. 1825 [Death of Alexander I; accession of Nicholas I; Decembrist revolt.] 1826 [Death of Karamzin (born 1766), author of "Poor Liza" («Бедная Лиза», 1792), History of the Russian State (1818-26).] 1830 [Aleksandr Pushkin's Tales of Belkin, «Повести Белкина».] 1831 Dostoevskii family buys small estate at Darovoe, 150 miles from Moscow. 1833 FMD goes away to school. 1834 [Pushkin's "Queen of Spades", «Пиковая дама».] 1836 Death of mother. [Nikolai Gogol' (1809-52) publishes "The Nose", «Нос»] 1837 FMD goes to St Petersburg, enters Academy of Engineers, housed in the Mik- hailovskii Castle. [Death of Pushkin (born 1799), after a duel, partly as the result of a malicious conspiracy.] 1839 Death of father, possibly murdered. 1841 Promoted to ensign. Plans romantic tragedies. [Death of Mikhail Lermontov (born 1814).] 1842 [Gogol' publishes first part of Dead Souls («Мертвые души»), and "The Over- coat" («Шинель»).] 1844 First published work: a translation of Balzac's Eugénie Grandet. Work on Poor Folk. 1845 Completes Poor Folk («Бедные люди»), which is greeted ecstatically (prior to publication) by Nikolai Nekrasov (1821-1877), Dmitrii Grigorovich (1822-1900), and Vissarion Belinskii (1811-1848), leaders of liberal thought and writing, whose enthusiasm guarantees FMD popularity in their literary circles.
    [Show full text]