Sarah's Diss Revised

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sarah's Diss Revised UNNERVING IMAGES: CINEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF ANIMAL SLAUGHTER AND THE ETHICS OF SHOCK by Sarah Jane O’Brien A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of The Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto © Copyright by Sarah Jane O’Brien (2012) —Abstract— UNNERVING IMAGES: CINEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF ANIMAL SLAUGHTER AND THE ETHICS OF SHOCK Sarah Jane O’Brien Doctor of Philosophy, 2012 The Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto This dissertation forges critical connections between the industrial logic of cutting up animals to make meat and cinematic techniques of cutting up indexical images of animals to create spectacle. I begin by identifying the cinematic attraction of violent animal death. In Chapter One, I argue that social and material conditions prevent cinema from representing real (i.e., unsimulated) human death, and the medium in turn relies on animal bodies to register visible evidence of death. I contend that this displacement does not yield the definitive knowledge of death that it promises; reviewing scenes of animal death, we acquire no real knowledge of the “fact” of death, but rather approach an understanding that we share death—finitude, vulnerability, suffering—with animals. Cinema’s ethical potential rests on its singular capacity to lay bare this shared susceptibility, and I thus shift my attention to evaluating how seminal scenes of animal slaughter and fundamental techniques of film form fulfil or fail this ethical potential. I begin my wide-ranging analysis by identifying and critiquing, in Chapter Two, the methods of exposure that currently dominate cinematic representations of slaughter. Through readings of an animal-advocacy video made by PETA, an industrial film made by the Hormel Co., a documentary about a labour dispute at a slaughter plant, and two popular animated representations of the meat industry, I demonstrate that these methods aim to maximize the visibility of slaughter, yet in doing so they mobilise conventions that disconnect slaughter from daily life and disassociate the spectator from the ii slaughtered animal body. I then look to representational strategies that destabilize the notion of slaughter as something apart. In Chapter Three, I question the enduring trope, inaugurated by Sergei Eisenstein’s Strike, of aligning indexical images of animal death with dramatic performances of human trauma and death; the production of this sort of dialectical conflict, I argue, elides the singularity and significance of animal life. In Chapter Four, I demonstrate, through close readings of Dziga Vertov’s Kino-Eye and Charles Burnett’s Killer of Sheep, the ethical value of non-dialectical formal strategies (namely, defamiliarization and juxtaposition) that develop connections between slaughter and daily life. iii —Acknowledgements— This dissertation would not have been possible without the careful reading, critical insight, and well-timed encouragement and levity of my dissertation committee. Over the course of my graduate studies and in every stage of this project, Eva-Lynn Jagoe inspired me to be a better reader and writer, and gently nudged me to answer the question, “so what?” Corinn Columpar shared her awe-inspiring understanding of film and film theory with me, and provided invaluable feedback along the way. Sara Salih graciously let me sit in on her thought-provoking seminar “‘The Human’ and the ‘Animal,’” and even more graciously agreed, at the eleventh hour, to lend her discerning eye to this project. Angela Cozea, an honorary member of the committee, sparked many of the initial ideas for this project and was a reassuring presence during the writing of it. In his capacity as internal reader, Eric Cazdyn brought his invaluable attention to the formal and political registers of this project. Jennifer Fay, who served as external reader, gave me feedback of the best variety—the kind that generates the next level of scholarship. Nor would this dissertation have been possible without the support of The Centre for Comparative Literature at the University of Toronto. Aphrodite Gardener and Bao Nguyen made all the administrative worries of graduate school disappear. The early encouragement and assistance of Neil ten Kortenaar and Jill Ross helped this project get off the ground and ensured its completion. This dissertation would not read as cogently as (I hope) it does without the exacting feedback of my writing group: Joe Culpepper, Ronald Ng, Rachel Stapleton, and Martin Zeilinger. I also want to thank Ronald for convincing me to stick with the writing—and even to love it once in awhile—and Martin for emphasizing the bigger picture. Catherine Schwartz and Lana Swartz very generously read chapters and gave me perceptive feedback. iv A great many of the ideas in this dissertation were triggered by and/or worked out in conversations with incredibly generous and knowledgeable colleagues. Discussions with James Cahill about André Bazin and Jacques Derrida proved formative at the beginning stages. Conversations with Nicole Shukin about the material logic of animal disassembly influenced my work as a whole and promise to inform subsequent stages of it. This dissertation and my broader scholarly interests were shaped and sharpened by the opportunity, in 2010–11, to work with a diverse group of scholars concerned with the topic of “Image and Spectacle” at the University of Toronto’s Jackman Humanities Institute, and I would like to extend a warm thanks to the staff and fellows at the JHI for their insight and friendship. I also want to extend my gratitude to my colleagues and students at the Abelard School, who not only were incredibly encouraging and enthusiastic about this project, but also provided me with a much-needed respite from it. Last but certainly not least, the encouragement and love of my friends and family kept me plugging away at this project. Michael Lamb, Bradley Rogers, Julia Schilling, Kay Tappan, Heather White, and many of the colleagues listed above kept me laughing and sane—or at least close to it. Myra Bloom shared a cozy house, a bleak carrel, and her seemingly endless store of perspective and hilarity with me. Paul Dallas never let me forget la passione. Katie Hitt and Mark O’Brien were constant sources of reason and motivation. Finally, Laurie O’Brien pushed me to question the limits between humans and animals, and showed me that writing was my way to address them. This dissertation is dedicated to her memory. v —Table of Contents— Abstract……………………………………………..…………………………...….................ii Acknowledgements……..…………………………………………………………..…….iv Introduction……………..…………………………..……………………………………..1 Chapter One Why Look at Dead Animals? I. Reading Rules, Facing Facts……………………………………………………..30 II. “Again and Again”……………………………………………………………….56 Chapter Two “Put a Video Camera Inside and Show It”: The Ethics of Exposing Animal Slaughter I. Framing Animal Slaughter……………………………………………………….83 II. It Matters How You Slice It………………………………………………...........86 III. The Place of Suffering……………………………………………………………91 IV. Naming Slaughter………...…………………………………...………………….99 V. The “Slaughterhouse Aesthetic”…………………………….……………...…..104 VI. The Sound of Slaughter…………………………………………………………121 VII. The Slaughterhouse as a Site of Proto-Cinematic Spectatorship….…................131 Chapter Three Shocking Blows: Dialectical Montage and the Attraction of Slaughter I. Introduction to Eisenstein’s Montage and Strike……………………………….141 II. The Mechanics of Dialectical Montage………………………………………...148 III. “A demonstration of the real”; or, the problem with (re)counting slaughter…...163 IV. “The swift blow as the ethical blow; the swift blow as ethics”………………...172 V. Efficiency and Excess…………………………………………………………..188 Chapter Four Binding and Loosing; or, The Ethics of Making Present I. Catching Life Unawares: Dziga Vertov’s Kino-Eye……………..…………....191 II. Nous revenons à nos moutons: Charles Burnett’s Killer of Sheep…..….……..213 Conclusion…….…..……………………………………………………………...………...246 Works Cited Filmography…………………………………………………………………………250 Bibliography……………………………………………………………….....……...253 vi —Introduction— I began thinking about this dissertation by casting a wide net, collecting texts and images that speak to a broad thematic: the ways humans represent and relate to animals through the literary and visual arts. At some point, the preliminary work of taking stock— of attempting to size up a vast discursive field—began to look like its opposite, and I found myself carving out a much more specific set of questions and deciding on a course to find their answers. These questions are, in brief, why do we look at documentary cinematic representations of violent animal death (specifically, animal slaughter), and are there ethical ways to construct and view such films? In retrospect, I can pinpoint two images that played a formative role in this transition—this narrowing of scope and intensification of purpose—and I discuss them here as a way of delineating the aims of this dissertation. I unfold these readings slowly and deliberately, with an eye to accounting for the central questions that motivate and structure this work as whole. The first reading, of Rainer Maria Rilke’s object poem “Schwarze Katze” (“Black Cat,” 1908), prepares my consideration, in Chapter One, of the medium-specific reasons for looking at animal death in film. The second, of the closing sequence of the documentary The Cove (Louie Psihoyos, 2009), explains the impetus behind
Recommended publications
  • The University of Chicago Old Elites Under Communism: Soviet Rule in Leninobod a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Di
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO OLD ELITES UNDER COMMUNISM: SOVIET RULE IN LENINOBOD A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY FLORA J. ROBERTS CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures .................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ vi A Note on Transliteration .................................................................................................. ix Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One. Noble Allies of the Revolution: Classroom to Battleground (1916-1922) . 43 Chapter Two. Class Warfare: the Old Boi Network Challenged (1925-1930) ............... 105 Chapter Three. The Culture of Cotton Farms (1930s-1960s) ......................................... 170 Chapter Four. Purging the Elite: Politics and Lineage (1933-38) .................................. 224 Chapter Five. City on Paper: Writing Tajik in Stalinobod (1930-38) ............................ 282 Chapter Six. Islam and the Asilzodagon: Wartime and Postwar Leninobod .................. 352 Chapter Seven. The
    [Show full text]
  • Animals Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2
    AAnniimmaallss LLiibbeerraattiioonn PPhhiilloossoopphhyy aanndd PPoolliiccyy JJoouurrnnaall VVoolluummee 55,, IIssssuuee 22 -- 22000077 Animal Liberation Philosophy and Policy Journal Volume 5, Issue 2 2007 Edited By: Steven Best, Chief Editor ____________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell Pg. 2-28 Jewish Ethics and Nonhuman Animals Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 29-47 Deliberative Democracy, Direct Action, and Animal Advocacy Stephen D’Arcy Pg. 48-63 Should Anti-Vivisectionists Boycott Animal-Tested Medicines? Katherine Perlo Pg. 64-78 A Note on Pedagogy: Humane Education Making a Difference Piers Bierne and Meena Alagappan Pg. 79-94 BOOK REVIEWS _________________ Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal, by Eric Schlosser (2005) Reviewed by Lisa Kemmerer Pg. 95-101 Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust, by Charles Patterson (2002) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 102-118 The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA, by Norm Phelps (2007) Reviewed by Steven Best Pg. 119-130 Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume V, Issue 2, 2007 Lev Tolstoy and the Freedom to Choose One’s Own Path Andrea Rossing McDowell, PhD It is difficult to be sat on all day, every day, by some other creature, without forming an opinion about them. On the other hand, it is perfectly possible to sit all day every day, on top of another creature and not have the slightest thought about them whatsoever. -- Douglas Adams, Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency (1988) Committed to the idea that the lives of humans and animals are inextricably linked, Lev Nikolayevich Tolstoy (1828–1910) promoted—through literature, essays, and letters—the animal world as another venue in which to practice concern and kindness, consequently leading to more peaceful, consonant human relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Pages
    About This Volume Brett Cooke We continue to be surprised by how the extremely rewarding world WKDW/HR7ROVWR\FUHDWHGLVDG\QDPLFVWLOOJURZLQJRQH:KHQWKH Russian writer sat down in 1863 to begin what became War and PeaceKHXWLOL]HGSRUWUDLWVRIfamily members, as well as images RIKLPVHOILQZKDWDW¿UVWFRQVWLWXWHGDOLJKWO\¿FWLRQDOL]HGfamily chronicle; he evidently used the exercise to consider how he and the SUHVHQWVWDWHRIKLVFRXQWU\FDPHWREH7KLVLQYROYHGDUHWKLQNLQJRI KRZKLVSDUHQWV¶JHQHUDWLRQZLWKVWRRGWKH)UHQFKLQYDVLRQRI slightly more than a half century prior, both militarily and culturally. Of course, one thinks about many things in the course of six highly FUHDWLYH \HDUV DQG KLV WH[W UHÀHFWV PDQ\ RI WKHVH LQWHUHVWV +LV words are over determined in that a single scene or even image typically serves several themes as he simultaneously pondered the Napoleonic Era, the present day in Russia, his family, and himself, DVZHOODVPXFKHOVH6HOIGHYHORSPHQWEHLQJWKH¿UVWRUGHUIRUDQ\ VHULRXVDUWLVWZHVHHDQWLFLSDWLRQVRIWKHSURWHDQFKDOOHQJHV7ROVWR\ posed to the contemporary world decades after War and Peace in terms of religion, political systems, and, especially, moral behavior. In other words, he grew in stature. As the initial reception of the QRYHO VKRZV 7ROVWR\ UHVSRQGHG WR WKH FRQVWHUQDWLRQ RI LWV ¿UVW readers by increasing the dynamism of its form and considerably DXJPHQWLQJLWVLQWHOOHFWXDODPELWLRQV,QKLVKDQGV¿FWLRQEHFDPH emboldened to question the structure of our universe and expand our sense of our own nature. We are all much the richer spiritually for his achievement. One of the happy accidents of literary history is that War and Peace and Fyodor 'RVWRHYVN\¶VCrime and PunishmentZHUH¿UVW published in the same literary periodical, The Russian Messenger. )XUWKHUPRUHDV-DQHW7XFNHUH[SODLQVERWKQRYHOVH[SUHVVFRQFHUQ whether Russia should continue to conform its culture to West (XURSHDQ PRGHOV VLPXOWDQHRXVO\ VHL]LQJ RQ WKH VDPH ¿JXUH vii Napoleon Bonaparte, in one case leading a literal invasion of the country, in the other inspiring a premeditated murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism
    Tolstoy in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism BORIS SOROKIN TOLSTOY in Prerevolutionary Russian Criticism PUBLISHED BY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR MIAMI UNIVERSITY Copyright ® 1979 by Miami University All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Sorokin, Boris, 1922­ Tolstoy in prerevolutionary Russian criticism. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Tolstoi, Lev Nikolaevich, graf, 1828-1910—Criticism and interpretation—History. 2. Criticism—Russia. I. Title. PG3409.5.S6 891.7'3'3 78-31289 ISBN 0-8142-0295-0 Contents Preface vii 1/ Tolstoy and His Critics: The Intellectual Climate 3 2/ The Early Radical Critics 37 3/ The Slavophile and Organic Critics 71 4/ The Aesthetic Critics 149 5/ The Narodnik Critics 169 6/ The Symbolist Critics 209 7/ The Marxist Critics 235 Conclusion 281 Notes 291 Bibliography 313 Index 325 PREFACE Leo Tolstoy (1828-1910) has been described as the most momen­ tous phenomenon of Russian life during the nineteenth century.1 Indeed, in his own day, and for about a generation afterward, he was an extraordinarily influential writer. During the last part of his life, his towering personality dominated the intellectual climate of Russia and the world to an unprecedented degree. His work, moreover, continues to be studied and admired. His views on art, literature, morals, politics, and life have never ceased to influence writers and thinkers all over the world. Such interest over the years has produced an immense quantity of books and articles about Tolstoy, his ideas, and his work. In Russia alone their number exceeded ten thousand some time ago (more than 5,500 items were published in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1957) and con­ tinues to rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Meat Consumption and Potential Reduction for Environmental and Public Health Benefits
    MEAT CONSUMPTION AND POTENTIAL REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH BENEFITS by GARRETT LENTZ A thesis submitted to the University of Otago in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Geography June 2019 Abstract The focus of this thesis was to better understand meat consumption and investigate how a shift to more plant-based diets may best be promoted. The various environmental impacts linked to animal agriculture were explored and a movement towards more plant-based diets was found as a solution that could alleviate environmental impacts, along with the added benefit of improving public health and helping to safeguard future food security. Shifting a behaviour that is as prevalent as meat consumption is no easy task however, as high rates of meat intake have become normalised in many developed nations, being influenced not only by the desires of individual actors’, but also structures within society that encourage continued production and consumption. Potential economic, regulatory, and informational measures to encourage meat reduction were explored and after weighing multiple factors, the potential for information provision to shift consumer meat intake held promise. However, before further inquiry into potential information provision measures, it was advisable to first obtain a more thorough understanding of consumers’ meat consumption within the relatively understudied nation of New Zealand. Thus, the first study of the thesis sought to better understand New Zealand consumers’ meat intake through the distribution of a nationwide questionnaire. Awareness of meat’s environmental impacts was determined to be low and the most common motivations for reducing meat were considerations of cost and health.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
    Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema in Dispute: Audiovisual Adventures of the Political Names ‘Worker’, ‘Factory’, ‘People’
    Cinema In Dispute: Audiovisual Adventures of the Political Names ‘Worker’, ‘Factory’, ‘People’ Manuel Ramos Martínez Ph.D. Visual Cultures Goldsmiths College, University of London September 2013 1 I declare that all of the work presented in this thesis is my own. Manuel Ramos Martínez 2 Abstract Political names define the symbolic organisation of what is common and are therefore a potential site of contestation. It is with this field of possibility, and the role the moving image can play within it, that this dissertation is concerned. This thesis verifies that there is a transformative relation between the political name and the cinema. The cinema is an art with the capacity to intervene in the way we see and hear a name. On the other hand, a name operates politically from the moment it agitates a practice, in this case a certain cinema, into organising a better world. This research focuses on the audiovisual dynamism of the names ‘worker’, ‘factory’ and ‘people’ in contemporary cinemas. It is not the purpose of the argument to nostalgically maintain these old revolutionary names, rather to explore their efficacy as names-in-dispute, as names with which a present becomes something disputable. This thesis explores this dispute in the company of theorists and audiovisual artists committed to both emancipatory politics and experimentation. The philosophies of Jacques Rancière and Alain Badiou are of significance for this thesis since they break away from the semiotic model and its symptomatic readings in order to understand the name as a political gesture. Inspired by their affirmative politics, the analysis investigates cinematic practices troubled and stimulated by the names ‘worker’, ‘factory’, ‘people’: the work of Peter Watkins, Wang Bing, Harun Farocki, Danièle Huillet and Jean-Marie Straub.
    [Show full text]
  • Leo Tolstoy's Sevastopol Stories
    2008.072008.07.0.0.0.02222 Classics Revisited: Leo TolstoyTolstoy’’’’ss Sevastopol Stories bybyby Walter G. Moss Eastern Michigan University With the following essay, the Review launches a new series entitled “Classics Revi- sited.” Its goal will be to provide thoughtful reconsiderations of masterpieces in the literature of war. Both literary and purely historical works will be included. The in- augural appreciation is by Walter G. Moss, professor of history at Eastern Michigan University. Professor Moss, who has taught Russian history, philosophy, and litera- ture for many years, is the author of numerous articles and distinguished books within and beyond those subject areas, including A History of Russia , 2 vols. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997; 2 nd ed. London: Anthem, 2002/5), Russia in the Age of Alexander II, Tolstoy, and Dostoyevsky (London: Anthem, 2002), An Age of Progress? Clashing Twentieth-Century Global Forces (London: Anthem, 2008), and, with R.D. Goff, J. Terry, J-H. Upshur, and M. Schroeder, The Twentieth Century and Beyond: A Global History , 7 th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007). — Ed. In April 1855, in the midst of the Crimean War, a twenty-six year old Russian sub- lieutenant, Leo Tolstoy, was commanding an artillery battery in the besieged Black Sea city of Sevastopol. 1 His unit was in the most forward bastion of the defense. It was close to the French lines and under constant and heavy bombardment. Occasionally while at the front, in a bomb-proof dugout with the sounds of cannons booming in his ears, he wrote a story about the siege of the city at the end of the previous year--he had first entered Sevastopol in November and subsequently moved back and forth from the front.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolstoy and Cosmopolitanism
    CHAPTER 8 Tolstoy and Cosmopolitanism Christian Bartolf Leo Tolstoy (1828–1910) is known as the famous Russian writer, author of the novels Anna Karenina, War and Peace, The Kreutzer Sonata, and Resurrection, author of short prose like “The Death of Ivan Ilyich”, “How Much Land Does a Man Need”, and “Strider” (Kholstomer). His literary work, including his diaries, letters and plays, has become an integral part of world literature. Meanwhile, more and more readers have come to understand that Leo Tolstoy was a unique social thinker of universal importance, a nineteenth- and twentieth-century giant whose impact on world history remains to be reassessed. His critics, descendants, and followers became almost innu- merable, among them Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi in South Africa, later called “Mahatma Gandhi”, and his German-Jewish architect friend Hermann Kallenbach, who visited the publishers and translators of Tolstoy in England and Scotland (Aylmer Maude, Charles William Daniel, Isabella Fyvie Mayo) during the Satyagraha struggle of emancipation in South Africa. The friendship of Gandhi, Kallenbach, and Tolstoy resulted in an English-language correspondence which we find in the Collected Works C. Bartolf (*) Gandhi Information Center - Research and Education for Nonviolence (Society for Peace Education), Berlin, Germany © The Author(s) 2018 121 A.K. Giri (ed.), Beyond Cosmopolitanism, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5376-4_8 122 C. BARTOLF of both, Gandhi and Tolstoy, and in the Tolstoy Farm as the name of the second settlement project of Gandhi
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity and the Structuring of the Public Domain in Kerala: a History of the Contemporary
    MASCULINITY AND THE STRUCTURING OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN IN KERALA: A HISTORY OF THE CONTEMPORARY Ph. D. Thesis submitted to MANIPAL ACADEMY OF HIGHER EDUCATION (MAHE – Deemed University) RATHEESH RADHAKRISHNAN CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF CULTURE AND SOCIETY (Affiliated to MAHE- Deemed University) BANGALORE- 560011 JULY 2006 To my parents KM Rajalakshmy and M Radhakrishnan For the spirit of reason and freedom I was introduced to… This work is dedicated…. The object was to learn to what extent the effort to think one’s own history can free thought from what it silently thinks, so enable it to think differently. Michel Foucault. 1985/1990. The Use of Pleasure: The History of Sexuality Vol. II, trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage: 9. … in order to problematise our inherited categories and perspectives on gender meanings, might not men’s experiences of gender – in relation to themselves, their bodies, to socially constructed representations, and to others (men and women) – be a potentially subversive way to begin? […]. Of course the risks are very high, namely, of being misunderstood both by the common sense of the dominant order and by a politically correct feminism. But, then, welcome to the margins! Mary E. John. 2002. “Responses”. From the Margins (February 2002): 247. The peacock has his plumes The cock his comb The lion his mane And the man his moustache. Tell me O Evolution! Is masculinity Only clothes and ornaments That in time becomes the body? PN Gopikrishnan. 2003. “Parayu Parinaamame!” (Tell me O Evolution!). Reprinted in Madiyanmarude Manifesto (Manifesto of the Lazy, 2006). Thrissur: Current Books: 78.
    [Show full text]
  • War and Peace
    WAR AND PEACE Instructor: Prof. Ingrid Kleespies Email: [email protected] Office Hours: T, W 2:00-3:00pm & by appt. Office: 328 Pugh Hall Vasily Vereshchagin, "Return from the Petrov Palace," 1895 Course Description From the battlefield to the ballroom, Tolstoy's epic novel of life in Russia at the beginning of the nineteenth century is a profound meditation on the causes of war, the nature of social relationships, the poles of human suffering and love, and, perhaps most importantly, the nature and meaning of history itself. In this course we will read War and Peace closely in its entirety. We will examine the origins of the novel in Tolstoy's early writing and consider the historical, political, and social contexts, both of the events described (the Napoleonic Wars) and the period fifty years later in which Tolstoy wrote War and Peace. We will address some of the following questions: Is War and Peace a novel? How does Tolstoy's obsession with the theme of history shape the text on a variety of levels? What do various adaptations of the novel tell us about its reception at different historical moments? Finally, how might War and Peace be relevant to our own moment in history? General Education Objectives This course will provide students with an opportunity to explore the interrelationship between literature, art, and national identity. In so doing, it is designed to fulfill General Education distribution requirements in the categories of “Humanities” (H) and “International” (N). The content of the course draws students’ attention to the values, attitudes, and norms that shape Russian culture (N).
    [Show full text]
  • Sensate Focus (Mark Fell) Y (Sensate Focus 1.666666) [Sensate Focus
    Sensate Focus (Mark Fell) Y (Sensate Focus 1.666666) [Sensate Focus / Editions M ego] Tuff Sherm Boiled [Merok] Ital - Ice Drift (Stalker Mix) [Workshop] Old Apparatus Chicago [Sullen Tone] Keith Fullerton Whitman - Automatic Drums with Melody [Shelter Press] Powell - Wharton Tiers On Drums [Liberation Technologies] High Wolf Singularity [Not Not Fun] The Archivist - Answers Could Not Be Attempted [The Archivist] Kwaidan - Gateless Gate [Bathetic Records] Kowton - Shuffle Good [Boomkat] Random Inc. - Jerusalem: Tales Outside The Framework Of Orthodoxy [RItornel] Markos Vamvakaris - Taxim Zeibekiko [Dust-To-Digital] Professor Genius - À Jean Giraud 4 [Thisisnotanexit] Suns Of Arqa (Muslimgauze Re-mixs) - Where's The Missing Chord [Emotional Rescue ] M. Geddes Genras - Oblique Intersection Simple [Leaving Records] Stellar Om Source - Elite Excel (Kassem Mosse Remix) [RVNG Intl.] Deoslate Yearning [Fauxpas Musik] Jozef Van Wissem - Patience in Suffering is a Living Sacrifice [Important Reords ] Morphosis - Music For Vampyr (ii) Shadows [Honest Jons] Frank Bretschneider machine.gun [Raster-Noton] Mark Pritchard Ghosts [Warp Records] Dave Saved - Cybernetic 3000 [Astro:Dynamics] Holden Renata [Border Community] the postman always rings twice the happiest days of your life escape from alcastraz laurent cantet guy debord everyone else olga's house of shame pal gabor billy in the lowlands chilly scenes of winter alambrista david neves lino brocka auto-mates the third voice marcel pagnol vecchiali an unforgettable summer arrebato attila
    [Show full text]