Science Case

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science Case ELTsc Cover A4 A-W 28/6/05 3:35 pm Page 1 ELTsc Cover A4 A-W 28/6/05 3:35 pm Page 2 The science case for THE EUROPEAN EXTREMELY LARGE TELESCOPE THE ESSENTIAL NEXT STEP IN MANKIND’S DIRECT OBSERVATION OF THE NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE, THIS WILL PROVIDE THE DESCRIPTION OF REALITY WHICH WILL UNDERLIE OUR DEVELOPING UNDERSTANDING OF ITS NATURE. ELTsc pages A4 A-W 28/6/05 3:31 pm Page 1 INDEX/CONTENTS 1 Executive summary 2 4.3.1.1 Cluster photometry with adaptive optics 62 1.1 Astronomy with a 50metre–100metre telescope 5 4.3.1.2 Analysis and results 62 4.3.1.3 Conclusions 64 2 Introduction 6 4.3.2 Spectroscopic observations of star clusters 66 2.1 The power of Extremely Large Telescopes 6 4.4 The stellar initial mass function 67 2.2 Telescope design requirements 7 4.5 Extragalactic massive stars beyond the local group 70 3 Planets and Stars 9 4.6 Stellar kinematic archaeology 72 3.1 Exoplanets 10 4.7 The intracluster stellar population 75 3.1.1 Highlight Science Case: Terrestrial planets 4.8 The cosmic star formation rate from supernovae 76 in habitable zones – “Exo-earths” 10 4.9 Young, massive star clusters 78 3.1.1.1 “Exo-earths” around Solar type stars 10 4.10 Black holes – studying the monsters in galactic nuclei 80 3.1.1.2 Spectroscopic signatures of life: biomarkers 11 4.10.1 Introduction 80 3.1.2 Simulations of planet detection with ELTs 12 4.10.2 The future of massive black hole astrophysics: 3.1.2.1 On-going simulations 13 new opportunities with an E-ELT 82 3.1.3 Giant planets: evolution and characterisation 15 5 Galaxies and Cosmology 84 3.1.4 Mature gas giant planets 15 5.1 Cosmological parameters 85 3.1.5 Earth-like moons in the habitable zone 16 5.1.1 Dark energy 85 3.1.5.1 Detection from reflex velocity measurements 17 5.1.1.1 Type la supernovae as distance indicators 86 3.1.5.2 Moon-induced astrometric wobble of the planet 17 5.1.1.2 Gamma-ray bursts as distance indicators 88 3.1.5.3 Spectral detection of terrestrial moons of 5.1.2 Expansion history 90 giant planets 18 5.1.2.1 Cosmic expansion history from primary 3.1.5.4 Mutual planet/satellite shadows and eclipses 18 distance indictors 90 3.1.6 Rings around extrasolar planets 19 5.1.2.2 Codex: the COsmic Differential EXpansion experiment 91 3.1.7 Planets around young stars in the solar neighbourhood 20 5.2 Highlight Science Case: First light – the first galaxies 3.1.8 Free-floating planets in star clusters and in the field 21 and the ionisation state of the early universe 93 3.2 Our solar system 22 5.2.1 Introduction 93 3.2.1 Mapping planets, moons and asteroids 23 5.2.2 The highest redshift galaxies (z>10) 95 3.2.1.1 Large and nearby asteroids 23 5.2.3 Galaxies and AGN at the end of re-ionisation (5<z>10) 97 3.2.1.2 Small asteroids 23 5.2.4 Probing the re-ionisation history 101 3.2.1.3 Major and minor moons 23 5.2.5 Early chemical evolution of the IGM 103 3.2.2 Transneptunian objects (TNOs) 24 5.3 Evolution of galaxies 105 3.2.3 Comets and the Oort cloud 24 5.3.1 Introduction 105 3.2.4 Surface and atmospheric changes 26 5.3.2 Physics of high redshift galaxies 107 3.3 Stars and circumstellar disks 28 5.3.3 The assembly of galaxy haloes 109 3.3.1 Formation of stars and protoplanetary discs 28 5.3.4 The star formation rate over the history of 3.3.1.1 Probing birthplaces 30 the universe 115 3.3.1.2 Structure in inner disks 31 5.4 Fundamental constants 118 3.3.1.3 Embedded young stellar objects 33 3.3.1.4 Jets and outflows: dynamics and moving shadows 33 Annex A Summary of the dependence of the science 3.3.1.5 Debris disks around other stars 34 cases on telescope aperture 121 3.3.2 The lives of massive stars 35 A1.1 Exoplanet detection from ground-based ELTs 121 3.3.2.1 Early phases of evolution 35 A1.2 Resolved stellar populations 123 3.3.2.2 Mature phase outflows 36 A1.3 The very high redshift universe 124 3.3.2.3 Normal and peculiar stars 37 A1.4 Summary 126 3.3.2.4 Asteroseismology 38 Annex B New scientific opportunities in the extremely 3.3.2.5 Chemical composition: the challenge of chronometry 39 large telescope era 127 3.3.3 The death of stars 41 B1.1 The physics – astrophysics connection 127 3.3.3.1 Mass function of black holes and neutron stars 41 B1.2 The next generation of ground-based astronomical 3.3.3.2 Isolated neutron stars 41 and related facilities 128 3.3.3.3 Black holes in globular clusters 42 B1.3 Future astronimical space missions 130 3.3.4 Microlenses: optical and near-infrared counterparts 45 B1.3.1 Comparison with JWST imaging sensitivity 131 4 Stars and Galaxies 46 B1.4 Exoplanet detection from space 132 4.1 The interstellar medium 46 B1.5 Supporting multi-wavelength science via the 4.1.1 Temperature and density probes in the virtual observatory 133 thermal infrared 47 B1.6 Developments in instrumentation 134 4.1.2 Fine structure in the ISM from ultrahigh B1.6.1 Adaptive optics modes for ELTs 134 signal-to-noise spectroscopy 47 B1.6.2 The use of ELTs at mid-infrared wavelengths 134 4.1.3 The high redshift ISM 48 B1.6.2.1 Design considerations for an ELT operating in 4.1.4 Measuring dust properties via polarimetry 48 the mid-IR 135 4.1.5 Optical studies in heavily extinguished regions 49 B1.6.3 The use of ELTs at sub-mm wavelengths 135 4.2 Highlight Science Case: Resolved stellar populations 50 B1.6.3.1 Design considerations for an ELT operating in 4.2.1 The Hubble Sequence: Understanding galaxy the submillimetre 136 formation and evolution 52 B1.6.4 The potential of astronomical quantum optics 136 4.2.2 Chemical evolution – spectroscopy of old stars 52 Credits 139 4.2.3 The resolved stellar population targets for the European Extremely Large Telescope 55 References 140 4.2.4 Technical issues and design requirements 56 4.3 Resolved stars in stellar clusters 59 Section authors and general contributors 144 4.3.1 Modelling and simulated observations of stellar clusters 60 ELTsc pages A4 A-W 28/6/05 3:31 pm Page 2 1 Executive summary SCIENCE CASE FOR THE EUROPEAN EXTREMELY LARGE TELESCOPE Astronomy is in its golden age. Since the invention of the telescope, astronomers have expanded mankind’s intellectual horizons, moving our perception of the Earth from an unmoving centre of the Universe to being one of several small planets around a typical small star in the outskirts of just one of billions of galaxies, all evolving in an expanding Universe in which planets are common. The nuclear energy sources which provide System objects – planets, comets and starlight are identified, and we know that the asteroids, to the formation of stars and chemical elements of which we are made are galaxies, extreme states of matter and space the ash of that process: stardust. Exotic states (e.g. around black holes) and finally to of matter are known: neutron stars, black determine the global matter-energy content of holes, quasars, pulsars. We can show that the our Universe. In the past half-century a new Universe started in an event, the Big Bang, and generation of telescopes and instruments see the heat remnant of that origin in the allowed a golden age of remarkable new Cosmic Microwave Background. Tiny ripples discoveries: quasars, masers, black holes, in that background trace the first minute gravitational arcs, extrasolar planets, gamma inhomogeneities from which the stars and ray bursts, the cosmic microwave background, galaxies around us grew. By comparing the dark matter and dark energy have all been weight of galaxies with the weight of all the discovered through the development of a visible matter, astronomers have proven that succession of ever larger and more the matter of which we, the planets, the stars, sophisticated telescopes. and the galaxies, are made is only a tiny part In the last decade, satellite observatories and of all the matter which exists: most matter is the new generation of 8- to 10-metre diameter some exotic stuff, unlike what we are made of, ground based telescopes, have created a new not yet detected directly, but whose weight view of our Universe, one dominated by poorly controls the movements of stars in our Galaxy. understood dark matter and a mysterious This ‘dark matter’ or ‘unseen mass’, whatever vacuum energy density. This progress poses it is made of, is five times more abundant than new, and more fundamental, questions, the are the types of matter of which we are made. answers to some of which will perhaps unite Perhaps most exotic of all, some new force astrophysics with elementary particle physics seems to be stretching space-time, accelerating in a new approach to the nature of matter. the expansion of the Universe. The nature of Some discoveries, made using relatively modest this force, which controls the future of the technologies, will require vast increases in Universe, remains quite unknown.
Recommended publications
  • Issue 59, Yir 2015
    1 Director’s Message 50 Fast Turnaround Program Markus Kissler-Patig Pilot Underway Rachel Mason 3 Probing Time Delays in a Gravitationally Lensed Quasar 54 Base Facility Operations Keren Sharon Gustavo Arriagada 7 GPI Discovers the Most Jupiter-like 58 GRACES: The Beginning of a Exoplanet Ever Directly Detected Scientific Legacy Julien Rameau and Robert De Rosa André-Nicolas Chené 12 First Likely Planets in a Nearby 62 The New Cloud-based Gemini Circumbinary Disk Observatory Archive Valerie Rapson Paul Hirst 16 RCW 41: Dissecting a Very Young 65 Solar Panel System Installed at Cluster with Adaptive Optics Gemini North Benoit Neichel Alexis-Ann Acohido 21 Science Highlights 67 Gemini Legacy Image Releases Nancy A. Levenson Gemini staff contributions 30 On the Horizon 72 Journey Through the Universe Gemini staff contributions Janice Harvey 37 News for Users 75 Viaje al Universo Gemini staff contributions Maria-Antonieta García 46 Adaptive Optics at Gemini South Gaetano Sivo, Vincent Garrel, Rodrigo Carrasco, Markus Hartung, Eduardo Marin, Vanessa Montes, and Chad Trujillo ON THE COVER: GeminiFocus January 2016 A montage featuring GeminiFocus is a quarterly publication a recent Flamingos-2 of the Gemini Observatory image of the galaxy 670 N. A‘ohoku Place, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720, USA NGC 253’s inner region Phone: (808) 974-2500 Fax: (808) 974-2589 (as discussed in the Science Highlights Online viewing address: section, page 21; with www.gemini.edu/geminifocus an inset showing the Managing Editor: Peter Michaud stellar supercluster Science Editor: Nancy A. Levenson identified as the galaxy’s nucleus) Associate Editor: Stephen James O’Meara and cover pages Designer: Eve Furchgott/Blue Heron Multimedia from each of issue of Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or GeminiFocus in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathématiques Et Espace
    Atelier disciplinaire AD 5 Mathématiques et Espace Anne-Cécile DHERS, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Peggy THILLET, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Yann BARSAMIAN, Education Nationale (mathématiques) Olivier BONNETON, Sciences - U (mathématiques) Cahier d'activités Activité 1 : L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL Activité 2 : DENOMBREMENT D'ETOILES DANS LE CIEL ET L'UNIVERS Activité 3 : D'HIPPARCOS A BENFORD Activité 4 : OBSERVATION STATISTIQUE DES CRATERES LUNAIRES Activité 5 : DIAMETRE DES CRATERES D'IMPACT Activité 6 : LOI DE TITIUS-BODE Activité 7 : MODELISER UNE CONSTELLATION EN 3D Crédits photo : NASA / CNES L'HORIZON TERRESTRE ET SPATIAL (3 ème / 2 nde ) __________________________________________________ OBJECTIF : Détermination de la ligne d'horizon à une altitude donnée. COMPETENCES : ● Utilisation du théorème de Pythagore ● Utilisation de Google Earth pour évaluer des distances à vol d'oiseau ● Recherche personnelle de données REALISATION : Il s'agit ici de mettre en application le théorème de Pythagore mais avec une vision terrestre dans un premier temps suite à un questionnement de l'élève puis dans un second temps de réutiliser la même démarche dans le cadre spatial de la visibilité d'un satellite. Fiche élève ____________________________________________________________________________ 1. Victor Hugo a écrit dans Les Châtiments : "Les horizons aux horizons succèdent […] : on avance toujours, on n’arrive jamais ". Face à la mer, vous voyez l'horizon à perte de vue. Mais "est-ce loin, l'horizon ?". D'après toi, jusqu'à quelle distance peux-tu voir si le temps est clair ? Réponse 1 : " Sans instrument, je peux voir jusqu'à .................. km " Réponse 2 : " Avec une paire de jumelles, je peux voir jusqu'à ............... km " 2. Nous allons maintenant calculer à l'aide du théorème de Pythagore la ligne d'horizon pour une hauteur H donnée.
    [Show full text]
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Chance, Luck and Statistics : the Science of Chance
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Alberta Gambling Research Institute Alberta Gambling Research Institute 1963 Chance, luck and statistics : the science of chance Levinson, Horace C. Dover Publications, Inc. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/41334 book Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Chance, Luck and Statistics THE SCIENCE OF CHANCE (formerly titled: The Science of Chance) BY Horace C. Levinson, Ph. D. Dover Publications, Inc., New York Copyright @ 1939, 1950, 1963 by Horace C. Levinson All rights reserved under Pan American and International Copyright Conventions. Published in Canada by General Publishing Company, Ltd., 30 Lesmill Road, Don Mills, Toronto, Ontario. Published in the United Kingdom by Constable and Company, Ltd., 10 Orange Street, London, W.C. 2. This new Dover edition, first published in 1963. is a revised and enlarged version ot the work pub- lished by Rinehart & Company in 1950 under the former title: The Science of Chance. The first edi- tion of this work, published in 1939, was called Your Chance to Win. International Standard Rook Number: 0-486-21007-3 Libraiy of Congress Catalog Card Number: 63-3453 Manufactured in the United States of America Dover Publications, Inc. 180 Varick Street New York, N.Y. 10014 PREFACE TO DOVER EDITION THE present edition is essentially unchanged from that of 1950. There are only a few revisions that call for comment. On the other hand, the edition of 1950 contained far more extensive revisions of the first edition, which appeared in 1939 under the title Your Chance to Win. One major revision was required by the appearance in 1953 of a very important work, a life of Cardan,* a brief account of whom is given in Chapter 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Arp - AM # Order
    Southern Arp - AM # Order A B C D E F G H I J 1 AM # Constellation Object Name RA DEC Mag. Size Uranom. Uranom. Millenium 2 1st Ed. 2nd Ed. 3 AM 0003-414 Phoenix ESO 293-G034 00h06m19.9s -41d30m00s 13.7 3.2 x 1.0 386 177 430 Vol I 4 AM 0006-340 Sculptor NGC 10 00h08m34.5s -33d51m30s 13.3 2.4 x 1.2 350 159 410 Vol I 5 AM 0007-251 Sculptor NGC 24 00h09m56.5s -24d57m47s 12.4 5.8 x 1.3 305 141 366 Vol I 6 AM 0011-232 Cetus NGC 45 00h14m04.0s -23d10m55s 11.6 8.5 x 5.9 305 141 366 Vol I 7 AM 0027-333 Sculptor NGC 134 00h30m22.0s -33d14m39s 11.4 8.5 x 2.0 351 159 409 Vol I 8 AM 0029-643 Tucana ESO 079- G003 00h32m02.2s -64d15m12s 12.6 2.7 x 0.4 440 204 409 Vol I 9 AM 0031-280B Sculptor NGC 150 00h34m15.5s -27d48m13s 12 3.9 x 1.9 306 141 387 Vol I 10 AM 0031-320 Sculptor NGC 148 00h34m15.5s -31d47m10s 13.3 2 x 0.8 351 159 387 Vol I 11 AM 0033-253 Sculptor IC 1558 00h35m47.1s -25d22m28s 12.6 3.4 x 2.5 306 141 365 Vol I 12 AM 0041-502 Phoenix NGC 238 00h43m25.7s -50d10m58s 13.1 1.9 x 1.6 417 177 449 Vol I 13 AM 0045-314 Sculptor NGC 254 00h47m27.6s -31d25m18s 12.6 2.5 x 1.5 351 176 386 Vol I 14 AM 0050-312 Sculptor NGC 289 00h52m42.3s -31d12m21s 11.7 5.1 x 3.6 351 176 386 Vol I 15 AM 0052-375 Sculptor NGC 300 00h54m53.5s -37d41m04s 9 22 x 16 351 176 408 Vol I 16 AM 0106-803 Hydrus ESO 013- G012 01h07m02.2s -80d18m28s 13.6 2.8 x 0.9 460 214 509 Vol I 17 AM 0105-471 Phoenix IC 1625 01h07m42.6s -46d54m27s 12.9 1.7 x 1.2 387 191 448 Vol I 18 AM 0108-302 Sculptor NGC 418 01h10m35.6s -30d13m17s 13.1 2 x 1.7 352 176 385 Vol I 19 AM 0110-583 Hydrus NGC
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of the Moon
    Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Formation
    3. Planet form ation Frontiers of A stronom y W orkshop/S chool Bibliotheca A lexandrina M arch-A pril 2006 Properties of planetary system s • all giant planets in the solar system have a > 5 A U w hile extrasolar giant planets have semi-major axes as small as a = 0.02 A U • planetary orbital angular momentum is close to direction of S un’s spin angular momentum (w ithin 7o) • 3 of 4 terrestrial planets and 3 of 4 giant planets have obliquities (angle betw een spin and orbital angular momentum) < 30o • interplanetary space is virtually empty, except for the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt • planets account for < 0.2% of mass of solar system but > 98% of angular momentum Properties of planetary system s • orbits of major planets in solar system are nearly circular (eMercury=0.206, ePluto=0.250); orbits of extrasolar planets are not (emedian=0.28) • probability of finding a planet is proportional to mass of metals in the star Properties of planetary system s • planets suffer no close encounters and are spaced fairly n regularly (Bode’s law : an=0.4 + 0.3×2 ) planet semimajor axis (A U ) n an (A U ) Mercury 0.39 −∞ 0.4 V enus 0.72 0 0.7 Earth 1.00 1 1.0 Mars 1.52 2 1.6 asteroids 2.77 (Ceres) 3 2.8 Jupiter 5.20 4 5.2 S aturn 9.56 5 10.0 U ranus 19.29 6 19.6 N eptune 30.27 7 38.8 Pluto 39.68 8 77.2 Properties of planetary system s • planets suffer no close encounters and are spaced fairly n regularly (Bode’s law : an=0.4 + 0.3×2 ) planet semimajor axis (A U ) n an (A U ) Mercury+ 0.39 −∞ 0.4 V enus 0.72 0 0.7 Earth 1.00 1 1.0 *predicted
    [Show full text]
  • Planets of the Solar System
    Chapter Planets of the 27 Solar System Chapter OutlineOutline 1 ● Formation of the Solar System The Nebular Hypothesis Formation of the Planets Formation of Solid Earth Formation of Earth’s Atmosphere Formation of Earth’s Oceans 2 ● Models of the Solar System Early Models Kepler’s Laws Newton’s Explanation of Kepler’s Laws 3 ● The Inner Planets Mercury Venus Earth Mars 4 ● The Outer Planets Gas Giants Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune Objects Beyond Neptune Why It Matters Exoplanets UnderstandingU d t di theth formationf ti and the characteristics of our solar system and its planets can help scientists plan missions to study planets and solar systems around other stars in the universe. 746 Chapter 27 hhq10sena_psscho.inddq10sena_psscho.indd 774646 PDF 88/15/08/15/08 88:43:46:43:46 AAMM Inquiry Lab Planetary Distances 20 min Turn to Appendix E and find the table entitled Question to Get You Started “Solar System Data.” Use the data from the How would the distance of a planet from the sun “semimajor axis” row of planetary distances to affect the time it takes for the planet to complete devise an appropriate scale to model the distances one orbit? between planets. Then find an indoor or outdoor space that will accommodate the farthest distance. Mark some index cards with the name of each planet, use a measuring tape to measure the distances according to your scale, and place each index card at its correct location. 747 hhq10sena_psscho.inddq10sena_psscho.indd 774747 22/26/09/26/09 111:42:301:42:30 AAMM These reading tools will help you learn the material in this chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]