Australian Sky & Telescope
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Gamma Leonis B
Gamma Leonis b The planetary system Gamma Leonis hosts at least one planet. Note that the system is a multiple star system. It hosts at least 2 stellar components. System parameters. Primary system name. Gamma Leonis. Alternative system names. N/A. Gamma-2 Leonis. Alternative star names. gamma 1 Leo, gam01 Leo, γ1 Leo, γ1 Leonis, γ Leo A, Gamma Leonis A, gamma Leo A, gam Leo A, Algieba A, Al Gieba A, HD 89484, HIP 50583 A, TYC 1423-1349-1, SAO 81298, BD+20 2467 A, WDS J10200+1950 A, STF 1424 A. Gamma Leonis's wiki: Gamma Leonis (γ Leo, γ Leonis) is a binary star system in the constellation Leo. It has the traditional name Algieba or Al Gieba . Name origin and history The name Algieba originates from the Arabic الجبهة Al-Jabhah Gamma Leonis b is an extrasolar planet located 125.5 light years away in the constellation Leo, orbiting the giant star Gamma Leonis. On November 6, 2009, a planetary companion around primary star Gamma1 Leonis has been announced. Moreover radial velocity variations would also hint two strong signals at 8.5 and 1340 days. The former periodicity is likely due to stellar pulsation, whereas the latter could be indicative of the presence of an additional planetary companion with 2.14 Jupiter masses Gamma Leonis (γ Leo / γ Leonis) is a binary star system in the constellation Leo. It also has the traditional name Algieba or Al Gieba. Name origin and history. The name "Algieba" originates from the Arabic "Al-Jabhah", meaning "the forehead". -
Messier Objects
Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun. -
Prospects of Detecting the Polarimetric Signature of the Earth-Mass Planet Α Centauri B B with SPHERE/ZIMPOL
A&A 556, A64 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321881 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Prospects of detecting the polarimetric signature of the Earth-mass planet α Centauri B b with SPHERE/ZIMPOL J. Milli1,2, D. Mouillet1,D.Mawet2,H.M.Schmid3, A. Bazzon3, J. H. Girard2,K.Dohlen4, and R. Roelfsema3 1 Institut de Planétologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), University Joseph Fourier, CNRS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 European Southern Observatory, Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile 3 Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland 4 Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM),13388 Marseille, France Received 12 May 2013 / Accepted 4 June 2013 ABSTRACT Context. Over the past five years, radial-velocity and transit techniques have revealed a new population of Earth-like planets with masses of a few Earth masses. Their very close orbit around their host star requires an exquisite inner working angle to be detected in direct imaging and sets a challenge for direct imagers that work in the visible range, such as SPHERE/ZIMPOL. Aims. Among all known exoplanets with less than 25 Earth masses we first predict the best candidate for direct imaging. Our primary objective is then to provide the best instrument setup and observing strategy for detecting such a peculiar object with ZIMPOL. As a second step, we aim at predicting its detectivity. Methods. Using exoplanet properties constrained by radial velocity measurements, polarimetric models and the diffraction propaga- tion code CAOS, we estimate the detection sensitivity of ZIMPOL for such a planet in different observing modes of the instrument. -
Exo-Mercat a Merged Exoplanet Catalog
Exo-MerCat a merged exoplanet catalog 1,2 Eleonora Alei , Riccardo Claudi1, Andrea Bignamini3, Marco Molinaro3 1 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova 2 DFA-UNIPD – Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia dell’Università degli Studi di Padova 3 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste IVOA Interoperability meeting Paris, 12-17 May 2019 Overview • Online exoplanet catalogs: state of the art • Raw statistics with the current datasets • Known Issues: updates, errors, selection criteria • Exo-MerCat: aims, description, efficiency • Update workflow and VO resource NASA Exoplanet Archive (NASA) Exoplanets Orbit Database (ORG) Open Exoplanet Catalogue (OEC) Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia (EU) Yikes! Raw statistics Raw Problems Selection Criteria Aliases Coordinates Updates - Names appear in different - Human errors (plus-minus - False positives are present in formats; signs); the catalogs because of lags - Whitespaces are present; - Not updated coordinates; in the updates; - Different aliases for the same - Different epochs. - New candidates have yet to be planet; included in the database. Algieba, gamma Leonis: Proxima Centauri b (ra,dec): in NASA: gam 1 Leo in NASA: (217.428995,-62.679485) in ORG: gamma Leo A in ORG: (217.448946,-62.681353) in EU: gamma 1 Leo in EU: (217.429167,-62.679444) in OEC: Gamma Leonis in OEC: (219.990850,-60.835619) 5 Aims • Provide greater uniformity among the databases; • More effective associations among the datasets; • Identify and correct errors, to warn the catalog maintainers; Exo-MerCat • Provide a direct link with most stellar sources archives; • Provide the user with an intuitive Graphical Interface to download and filter data. 6 Icons made by https://www.flaticon.com/authors/gregor-cresnar from www.flaticon.com Description Initialization • Create a nested folder to contain all useful files; • Use various Virtual Observatory tools to download raw datasets: Exo-MerCat • wget command to access NASA/ORG database; • git commands and an *.xml reader to access the OEC database; • VO TAP service for the EU database. -
Naming the Extrasolar Planets
Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named. -
Exploration of the Moon
Exploration of the Moon The physical exploration of the Moon began when Luna 2, a space probe launched by the Soviet Union, made an impact on the surface of the Moon on September 14, 1959. Prior to that the only available means of exploration had been observation from Earth. The invention of the optical telescope brought about the first leap in the quality of lunar observations. Galileo Galilei is generally credited as the first person to use a telescope for astronomical purposes; having made his own telescope in 1609, the mountains and craters on the lunar surface were among his first observations using it. NASA's Apollo program was the first, and to date only, mission to successfully land humans on the Moon, which it did six times. The first landing took place in 1969, when astronauts placed scientific instruments and returnedlunar samples to Earth. Apollo 12 Lunar Module Intrepid prepares to descend towards the surface of the Moon. NASA photo. Contents Early history Space race Recent exploration Plans Past and future lunar missions See also References External links Early history The ancient Greek philosopher Anaxagoras (d. 428 BC) reasoned that the Sun and Moon were both giant spherical rocks, and that the latter reflected the light of the former. His non-religious view of the heavens was one cause for his imprisonment and eventual exile.[1] In his little book On the Face in the Moon's Orb, Plutarch suggested that the Moon had deep recesses in which the light of the Sun did not reach and that the spots are nothing but the shadows of rivers or deep chasms. -
Direct Measure of Radiative and Dynamical Properties of an Exoplanet Atmosphere
DIRECT MEASURE OF RADIATIVE AND DYNAMICAL PROPERTIES OF AN EXOPLANET ATMOSPHERE The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Wit, Julien de, et al. “DIRECT MEASURE OF RADIATIVE AND DYNAMICAL PROPERTIES OF AN EXOPLANET ATMOSPHERE.” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 820, no. 2, Mar. 2016, p. L33. © 2016 The American Astronomical Society. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L33 Publisher American Astronomical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/114269 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 820:L33 (6pp), 2016 April 1 doi:10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L33 © 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. DIRECT MEASURE OF RADIATIVE AND DYNAMICAL PROPERTIES OF AN EXOPLANET ATMOSPHERE Julien de Wit1, Nikole K. Lewis2, Jonathan Langton3, Gregory Laughlin4, Drake Deming5, Konstantin Batygin6, and Jonathan J. Fortney4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 3 Department of Physics, Principia College, Elsah, IL 62028, USA 4 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA 5 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD 20742, USA 6 Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Received 2016 January 28; accepted 2016 February 18; published 2016 March 28 ABSTRACT Two decades after the discovery of 51Pegb, the formation processes and atmospheres of short-period gas giants remain poorly understood. -
PDF (Volume 84:1, Spring 2021)
Contents Spring 2021 Features Departments Online 2 Letters Frances Arnold (p. 6) Video: Acceptance Speech for 4 SoCaltech President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology 15 In the Community: Millikan and Other Eugenicists’ Names to be Removed from Campus Buildings, Assets, and Honors 39 In Memoriam 40 Endnotes: We have been living with the impact and challenges of the coronavirus pandemic for a The Earthquake Experts (back cover) year now. How have you changed Website: Caltech Science Exchange and what have you learned? Left: This illustration by Kristen Uroda depicts the serotonin molecule, whose role in sleep is explored in Neural Networking (p. 36) the most recent issue of The Caltech Website: The Caltech Effect Effect. See article on page 36. 16 22 26 32 36 Worlds Together Story of a Lonely Planet Crossing Paths A Global Treasure Hunt Neural Networking The Caltech Center for Przemyslaw Mroz, a postdoc- The two most recent Nobel How a term paper on With the opening of the Comparative Planetary toral scholar at Caltech, and Prize-winning Caltech alumni, Newton’s Principia led to Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Evolution unites astronomers, his colleagues have discovered Charles Rice (PhD ’81) and a decade-long search for Neuroscience Research geologists, and planetary the smallest known “rogue Andrea Ghez (PhD ’92), talk first-edition copies around Building, Caltech scientists scientists on a shared planet,” a free-floating world with a fellow alum about the world. have a vital new hub for mission to understand what without a star. their work, their campus interdisciplinary brain different planets can tell us experiences, and life after research. -
The Outermost Hii Regions of Nearby Galaxies
THE OUTERMOST HII REGIONS OF NEARBY GALAXIES by Jessica K. Werk A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Astronomy and Astrophysics) in The University of Michigan 2010 Doctoral Committee: Professor Mario L. Mateo, Co-Chair Associate Professor Mary E. Putman, Co-Chair, Columbia University Professor Fred C. Adams Professor Lee W. Hartmann Associate Professor Marion S. Oey Professor Gerhardt R. Meurer, University of Western Australia Jessica K. Werk Copyright c 2010 All Rights Reserved To Mom and Dad, for all your love and encouragement while I was taking up space. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I owe a deep debt of gratitude to a long list of individuals, institutions, and substances that have seen me through the last six years of graduate school. My first undergraduate advisor in Astronomy, Kathryn Johnston, was also my first Astronomy Professor. She piqued my interest in the subject from day one with her enthusiasm and knowledge. I don’t doubt that I would be studying something far less interesting if it weren’t for her. John Salzer, my next and last undergraduate advisor, not only taught me so much about observing and organization, but also is responsible for convincing me to go on in Astronomy. Were it not for John, I’d probably be making a lot more money right now doing something totally mind-numbing and soul-crushing. And Laura Chomiuk, a fellow Wesleyan Astronomy Alumnus, has been there for me through everything − problem sets and personal heartbreak alike. To know her as a friend, goat-lover, and scientist has meant so much to me over the last 10 years, that confining my gratitude to these couple sentences just seems wrong. -
Dr. Konstantin Batygin Curriculum Vitae Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences [email protected] California Institute of Technology (626) 395-2920 1200 E
Dr. Konstantin Batygin Curriculum Vitae Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences [email protected] California Institute of Technology (626) 395-2920 1200 E. California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125 Education Ph.D., Planetary Science (2012) California Institute of Technology doctoral advisors: David J. Stevenson & Michael E. Brown M.S., Planetary Science (2010) California Institute of Technology B.S., Astrophysics (2008) (with honors) University of California, Santa Cruz undergraduate advisor: Gregory Laughlin Academic Employment Professor of Planetary Science, Caltech May 2019 - present Van Nuys Page Scholar, Caltech May 2017 - May 2019 Assistant Professor of Planetary Science, Caltech Jun. 2014 - May 2019 Harvard ITC Postdoctoral Fellow, Harvard Center for Astrophysics Nov. 2012 - Jun. 2014 Postdoctoral Fellow, Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, Nice, France Jul. 2012 - Nov. 2012 Visiting Scientist, Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, Nice, France Feb. 2011 - Mar. 2011 Graduate Research Assistant/Teaching Assistant, Caltech Sep. 2008 - Jun. 2012 Research Assistant, UCO/Lick Observatory Mar. 2006 - Sep. 2008 Supplemental Instructor, University of California, Santa Cruz Mar. 2006 - Jun. 2006 Research Assistant, NASA Ames Research Center Jul. 2005 - Jan. 2006 Awards Sloan Fellowship in Physics - 2018 Packard Fellowship for Science & Engineering - 2017 Genius100 Visionary Award, Albert Einstein Legacy Foundation - 2017 Garfinkel Lectureship in Celestial Mechanics (Yale) - 2017 AAS WWT Prize in Research - 2016 Popular Science Brilliant 10 - 2016 -
Eyes Skies Full En.Pdf
1 00:00:05,240 --> 00:00:08,800 By taking our sense of sight far beyond the realm of our forebears' 2 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:13,200 imagination, these wonderful instruments, the telescopes, open the way to 3 00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:17,240 a deeper and more perfect understanding of nature. - René Descartes, 1637 4 00:00:17,720 --> 00:00:22,520 For millennia mankind gazed out into the mesmerising night sky 5 00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:28,320 without recognising the stars of our own Milky Way Galaxy as other suns 6 00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:33,400 or the billions of sister galaxies making up the rest of our Universe 7 00:00:35,440 --> 00:00:38,760 or that we are merely punctuation in the Universe’s 8 00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:42,480 13.7 billion year-long story. 9 00:00:42,560 --> 00:00:46,080 With only our eyes as observing tools we had no means of 10 00:00:46,160 --> 00:00:50,120 finding solar systems around other stars, or of determining 11 00:00:50,200 --> 00:00:55,000 whether life exists elsewhere in the Universe. 12 00:00:58,080 --> 00:01:00,320 Today we are well on our way to unravelling many of the 13 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:03,520 mysteries of the Universe, living in what may be the most remarkable 14 00:01:03,600 --> 00:01:05,920 age of astronomical discovery. -
List of Easy Double Stars for Winter and Spring = Easy = Not Too Difficult = Difficult but Possible
List of Easy Double Stars for Winter and Spring = easy = not too difficult = difficult but possible 1. Sigma Cassiopeiae (STF 3049). 23 hr 59.0 min +55 deg 45 min This system is tight but very beautiful. Use a high magnification (150x or more). Primary: 5.2, yellow or white Seconary: 7.2 (3.0″), blue 2. Eta Cassiopeiae (Achird, STF 60). 00 hr 49.1 min +57 deg 49 min This is a multiple system with many stars, but I will restrict myself to the brightest one here. Primary: 3.5, yellow. Secondary: 7.4 (13.2″), purple or brown 3. 65 Piscium (STF 61). 00 hr 49.9 min +27 deg 43 min Primary: 6.3, yellow Secondary: 6.3 (4.1″), yellow 4. Psi-1 Piscium (STF 88). 01 hr 05.7 min +21 deg 28 min This double forms a T-shaped asterism with Psi-2, Psi-3 and Chi Piscium. Psi-1 is the uppermost of the four. Primary: 5.3, yellow or white Secondary: 5.5 (29.7), yellow or white 5. Zeta Piscium (STF 100). 01 hr 13.7 min +07 deg 35 min Primary: 5.2, white or yellow Secondary: 6.3, white or lilac (or blue) 6. Gamma Arietis (Mesarthim, STF 180). 01 hr 53.5 min +19 deg 18 min “The Ram’s Eyes” Primary: 4.5, white Secondary: 4.6 (7.5″), white 7. Lambda Arietis (H 5 12). 01 hr 57.9 min +23 deg 36 min Primary: 4.8, white or yellow Secondary: 6.7 (37.1″), silver-white or blue 8.